#help-39
1 messages Ā· Page 184 of 1
sure if you want
Alr
<@&286206848099549185>
This is a assignment worth 7% btw so I need the answer to be 100% right
there is a lot of inconsistency in this
Wym
š
did you make it?
Yes
I got it from the website the teacher posted tho
This is the question btw: Part 2: Modelling Depreciation
Next, we will be modelling car prices using Desmos. You will do this part of the assignment on your own. This website shows the history of car prices for different makes and models of a car:
https://www.cargurus.com/research/price-trends
Choose a car make and model that you would like to analyze. Choose a car with the model year 2015.
You can edit the start and end date to see the price of the car over a given period of time.
Enter the price of your chosen car in June of each year. If you canāt find the cost in June of a given year, write down the cost on the day closest to June.
Name of car (make and model): BMW M5
can you check $37,793.29
Where do u see that?
in 2030, its gonna be peak low
.
well, a bit higher
Unless the car gets more expensive you never know
Where do u see it?
What about it?
2030 is on the edge of the right side
Yea?
yea
sane
Thank God
same
W
nah its sad for me some homies leavin
got discord
?
at least we can vc thru discord
Oh yea
you know the monty hall problem
No
Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?
nope
Why lmao
lemme show diagram
Alr
how bout the birthday paradox
Nope never heard of it lmao
how many people would it take in one room to get two people of same birthdate
Huh
just 56
i have no friggin idea why, but theres this formula, (365/365)x(364/365)x(363/365) and repeat until no people left
Oh
Whatās the q
.
FINALLY BRO SOMEONE
Finally lmao
Linear regression is best
For low data
Iām assuming itās the case here
U can also try xgboost for low data
But u lose interprebility
I use xgboost, but i guess ill see you do regression
Oh
im not that good.
Just use xgboost
Itās good for most low sample size tasks
If u want to do better u need more data
Then u do neural net
oh im not talking about this problem
Wut
we just need a money amount
Wtf is zgboost
Let's stick to what I know pls
Cuz my teacher will be suspicious on me on how I found that
When I never heard of it
from graph
So I had to make a graph and graph it on desmos
From the years 2015-2024
And how the prices changed over time
And got this
y=13793.8241sin(0.585195(x-1.28605))+51317.0035
Now I need to find the price of the car in 2030
Here's what chatgpt said: š
anthony
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
@flat plover āļø
Closed by @hollow cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can you create a set of polar equations that represent different conic sections and other shapes, using the forms provided in the instructions? Your final product must include at least 8 polar equations, with a minimum of 4 different types, domain restrictions where appropriate, and a reference photo or description for inspiration. Additionally, you should upload the completed polar graphs to Desmos, ensuring you follow all formatting guidelines such as shading and dashed lines where applicable.
What is your question? @royal coral
i dont have a question i have this project that ive been working on for the whole week and i cant seem to make it work ive used ai but it just doesnt work at this point ive given up and im willing to pay $2 to do it for me on desmos
@worthy lance
We do not do projects here, we can answer specific math questions.
You do not have a specific math question.
So this is not the place to ask
Did you want help figuring it out tho?
sure
actually nvm i dont think you can help
i have to draw something on desmos using equations, 8 of them being polar equations
Polar in desmos does not seem too hard
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ms3eghkkgz
do you know desmos has a built in polar coordinate system?
@royal coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone tell me how to calculate a triangle if we only know one side
you cant
I thought you use sqrt2?
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
you need more info
In quadrilateral ABCD with an area of 48 cm², diagonal AC has a length of 8 cm and divides the quadrilateral into two triangles: ABC and ACD (see the diagram). The height of triangle ACD drawn from vertex D to line AC is 2 cm.
Calculate the height of triangle ABC drawn from vertex B to line AC. Show your calculations.
<@&286206848099549185>
@visual garnet the area of the quadrilateral is the sum of the areas of the two triangles, correct?
Can you find the area of triangle ACD?
If so, what does that make the area of the triangle ABC?
Finally, now that you know the area of ABC, what is the height in question?
,calc 821/2
Result:
8
whats the formula for the area of a triangle
This is base or āaā of a triangle.
Any leg can be the base of a triangle
It doesn't need to be "the one on the bottom"
You already used this to calculate ACD, in fact
Your arithmetic is off
8 cm * 4 cm * 1/2 = 12 cm^2
It's Area = 1/2 * a * h
The height of ACD is 12 cm
Ooooh
Ooooh
40 cm = 1/2 * a * h
40 - 1/2 : a
,calc 40*0.5/8
Result:
2.5
You did the math wrong
Be a little more careful, you made a mistake
wym
Check your work specifically on moving the 1/2
You careless dawg
So minus 1/2
šš
You took 2 mins to type one sentence (three words)
You subtract when things are being added to move across the equal
But itās minus 1/2
But this isn't being added
It's being multiplied
Here it's multiplied
where?
$40 cm = \frac {1}{2} * 8 cm * h$
Ahsoka Tano
$40 cm - \frac {1}{2} : 8 cm = h$
Ahsoka Tano
Uh nah how about
Dividing by 1/2 on both sides or in other words multiplying by 2 on both sides fr
,w 1/2/1/2
Bruh
Wdym divide both sides?
You do know how dividing by fractions works right
Letās say
Anything done to one side must be done to the other to maintain equality, unless it's multiplying by 1 or adding 0
$3x + 2x + 7 = 7x$
Ahsoka Tano
Yes
X = 3.5
Yes
You did to get rid of the 2
$2x=7$
how do you find x?
Skissue ping4response
$\frac{1}{2}$
Ahsoka Tano
BY DIVIDING
Multiplication by 1/2 is the same as dividing by 2š
Iām lostā¦
by dividing by 2 yes? to get $\frac{2x}{2}=\frac{7}{2}\implies x=\frac{7}{2}$
I just donāt understand why is it not minus 1/2
Skissue ping4response
Its good
What grade are you in rn
donāt remember
Huh
Fr?
Idk mayb 8
So like are you in the education system right now
alright, $40=\frac{1}{2}\cdot 8\cdot h\implies 40=4\cdot h$, what do you do to find h?
Skissue ping4response
but here you divide by 2?
Sureā¦
But like
You change the signsā¦
I think yall donāt know how to explain to people
<@&286206848099549185> maybe someone else?
ā¦.
;-;
being ignoredā¦
-_-
We tried man
What is the question
if i have a+x=b then i subtract a from both sides to be left with x=b-a, what you call 'moving' and getting a sign change
the same principle doesnt apply to multiplication, because the inverses are defined differently between addition and multiplication
if i have ax=b then i divide by a (multiply by 1/a) to get x=b/a
the first case is (-a)+a+x=(-a)+b
0+x=-a+b=b-a=x
the second is 1/a (ax) =1/a (b), x=b/a
explicitly
Oh if you're under 13 we have a specific channel where we give more simplified explanations
@visual garnet Has your question been resolved?
Oh!
So?
The number was 1/2
+1/2 to be exact
If it was x * 1/2
Iād divide 1/2
which is multiplying by 2, sure
i havent actually looked at the stuff prior to my message in any detail
This doesnāt make sense at all
you dont subtract, but instead you multiply by 2 (ie dividing by 1/2) to remove 1/2 from the right side, since 1/2 is being multiplied, not added
I have this equation:
Ahsoka Tano
you can rewrite this as (8*h)/2
and then itd make much more sense to multiply by two
Ok then
to get rid of the denominator
I use YOUR method
yes
Result:
5
remember to check your answer to see if you got it right
we know that the area is 40 cm, ans the area of the triangle is (b*h)/2 so does (5*8)/2 equal 40?
Itās apparently 10ā¦
its not times 1/2 its times 2
ping me instead of saying my name please
here!
(8 * h)/2 = 40
idk latex im so sorry lol
but here we have a fraction on the left hand side
and to get rid of it, we should multiply by the denominator on both sides
ie here, multiplying by two on both sides
yes
then we have 8 * h = 80
10
yes!
do you understand now?
@visual garnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this topic named mathematical reasoning, it's totally a new topic for me, so can anyone tell me how to solve these ?
Can ping
@crimson hemlock Has your question been resolved?
Do you know when a statement If P then Q evaluates to true and false
Yeah I know a little bit about that
These are logical statements which evaluate to true and false only
Yeah but do you know when they are true and when they are false
Kind of I guess
Ok what is the truth value of "If P then Q" when P and Q are true
I don't get about what P then Q means here?
Where are you learning this from
Anyway it basically means is it possible to derive Q from P
P and Q are logical statements that evaluate to true or false
@crimson hemlock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need someone to help me with these triangle proofs asap
i need to get this is to pass this semester and its due tomorrow at 8am
yes i know that
so you need a congruency theorem to apply here
well i need to add a statement first
notice that both triangles share an edge. what doe that mean?
they congruent
wait
what about ac=ac
using reflexive property as a reason
okay okay
next statement
reflexive property is the reason
but when you compare the sides
they have opposite chirality
so if i do AC = CA what would the reason be
that is, when you transform one to perfectly overlap the other, you'll notice that C for one trianlge overlays A on the other, and vice-versa
"reflexive property"
how can you show that <BCA ~= <DAC?
it's one of the first transversal theorems you learned
hmm
with those statements, you can say that triangle ABC ~= triangle ADC by AAS congruency
boom
finally, AB ~= DC by CPCTC
?
you're not keeping up
sorry im confused
āļø
because you're not keeping up
show me what you put
what happened to your relexive property from earlier for AC and CA?
honestly idk
ill add it back rq
okay
thank you 1 down
2 to go
so
i tried this one earlier
and i had like almost all the angles congruent and it didnt let me say the triangles were
which one
let me get some paper
okay
ok
we have enough info now
to show that triangle AEB is isosceles
or more specifically for use case, isoangular (same thing)
so what would the statement be
definition of isosceles triangle
statement 1
any triangle with two equal sides or two equal angles is isosceles/equilangular
okay
you got it?
now we want to show that <DAE = <CBE
we already know that <DAB = <CBA
and since now we know the middle triangle is isosceles, we know that <EAB = <EBA.
so that last line is your next statement
no, I made a correction, and you're still not following what I am saying
you didn't read the next three lines
i dont understand what your trying to say
which lines do you not understand
āļø
oh well
no way.
you need to sleep more than you need to pass sophomore math?
yes
i need sleep so my brain brains
its too late
for brain
so brain no brain
ive been doing this since 7pm š
i beg you
you haven't been doing this since 7pm
i swear
September
this assignment
right but this is a class I've taught
as a substitute, granted
but here's what I remember about that experience
arriving two hours early every day
staying two hours late every day
and seeing almost nobody asking for help before or after school
but plenty of students with spotty attendence asking for favors at the end of the semester
well i didnt have u as a teacher
then you can ask for help from somebody else
I'm sorry this format doesn't work so well for you
it's very verbose, not very visual or interactive
It's not my favorite either
certainly not for geometry
I hope you notice
that I was basically spoonfeeding you what to write
and you still got frustrated
it's not the easiest transition
well here's a fact
this is a pretty famous geometry homework problem
the figure anyway
odds are good somebody worked this out on Youtube
if you want to follow along with their solution
orrr
you could just like
tell me the answers
to two problems
out of the other 100 i been doing since 7pm.
if u never figure out ur self, you will never develop the intuition to know what to do
you dont build that skill
(coming from experience) (Discrete maths)
thats all about proofs
by the way man, teachers don't like failing kids
they'll take your homework past due if they know you did it and tried. If the stupid software will let you finish it
they'll just be glad you did it
because it justifies their subject
"oh damn, this kid DID THE MATH?"
today last day of the semester and day b4 winter break
i dont think
they would
take it late
the line I told you to write
just look up a video that teaches u that lesson specifically again
Hey man, Iām a student right now too so I get it: dealing with work is hard but asking for answers is only beneficial in the short run. You will literally learn it far more effectively by trying it on your own
exactly
hey "man" ive been trying it on my own for almost 7 hours now
yeah i spent 2 days on 1 question once its ok
Then your task isnāt to work on this problem; itās to work on something easier
thx for letting me know
Take a break for a while and come back to it
I finished it.
thats dumb logic this is a assignment thats due in 6 and a half hours
Well clearly asking for answers isnāt working right? So it appears your only option is to actually learn the content
Trust me. This is the fastest way
I offered to finish the problem with you and I even offered in DM to video record the paper I worked out step-by-step (if you don't get motion sickness) so I don't know what more anybody can do for you here if that's not enough
video record paper is crazy
I already did it and it's only 6 lines
please reply to when you offereed to dm a video of u recording the paper or wtv
lol
it's a DM
direct message
can we upload vids here?
oh, maybe
i didnt see it because it went in my message request
i dont get like notis for that or wtv
and you can
if its like not to big of a file
unless the servers boosted
so i guess im alone now
BRO FINALLY
and i still have one more
great
That was a fast 7 hours
what
nice job
do you remember your bisection theorems?
I sure don't
I remember that one angle bisection theorem is the converse of the other
Angle bisector theorem states that the bisector of any angle will divide the opposite side in the ratio of the sides containing the angle. Learn more about this interesting concept of triangle angle bisector theorem formula, proof, and solved examples.
This isnāt necessary for the problem
AC bisects BD because triangle CEB is congruent to AED
yeah I'm regretting posting that
we can't say much about the angles at the start
wait reallt?
like no duh bro
holy
yes...?
i need these useless statements and reasons thatim never gonna use in life
by AAS or anything like that
Sometimes itās easier to work backwards
Now you have an easier statement to work towards
i don't know what statements you have available to choose
oh yeah
whatttt
draw the triangles separately
(āÆĀ°ā”°)āÆļøµ ā»āā»
i dont want to
.....
woop, this is the moment I check out
i can imagine it
u clearly can't or you'd solve the problem
Maybe we should let him work on it a while and once he has a specific question we can answer from there?
remember properties of an icoseles triangle
yeah i don't think he really needs help lol
i need answers
you need patience
i gave u the answer for the last problem but you couldn't even parse it to solve your exercise
it helps you to actually learn the topic
bc you're going to have to do more of these in school
it doesn't matter if it's useful to you irl or not, does it?
unless you plan on dropping out of school then okay yeah there's no reason to learn this maybe
is this a test?
look, im fine you making silly messages about me but please do not disturb in other peoples help channels. thank you @pearl yew

You know what's given, right?
yes
Okay so youāre trying to prove that the diagonal cuts directly through the middle right?
is 3,4,5 your typing or directly from the question?
from 2-5 is all mine
And you almost have a triangle congruence on the two sides there
only 1 was given to me
How can you prove those triangles are congruent?
i dont know bro
Well think on it for a while
Thatās what youāre trying to get to right
no im trying to get to ac bisects bd
To do that, youād probably need establish congruency between some of the triangles
But wouldnāt be = ed imply that?
Thatās what bisecting means
okay but im proving bisecting not congruence
Mhm, youāre trying to prove those sides are equal (be and ed)
And the easiest way of doing that is to show the triangles are congruent first
Then since the triangles are congruent, the corresponding sides (which are be and ed) should also be congruent
bro im actually bouta just accept to fail
I mean if thatās your decision go for it
But we both know it would be extremely tragic to lose at the last stretch
This is the fastest way and the sooner you accept that, the faster the end will arrive
Can you list the triangle congruence theorems?
Then I canāt help ya bud
Side-Side-Side (SSS), Side-Angle-Side (SAS), Angle-Side-Angle (ASA), and Angle-Angle-Side (AAS)
Youāre the one learning here
Mhm, now which of those could you actually use for these specific triangles?
asa
Read all of em, one of them looks pretty obvious to me
Well obviously one does since the angles are equal
dude
Read them carefully
Yeah I guess so
Wait which angles are you trying to prove are the same?
B and D
Well thatās not abe and ade
what is it then
Oh you mean the small ones
Okay okay sorry you can keep the angles
When you had the other ones I thought you meant the opposite angles of the parallelogram
Okay so those angles are on opposite parallel lines right?
yes
im actually about to jump
i came to this server for answers 1 hour and a half ago
for 2 questions
Then leave and figure it out
Itās probably faster than you typing and discord and complaining anyways
no i need nano jumpers help
No you donāt. Donāt wait for me. You can figure it out
If you really need a hint: ||itās because of another triangle congruence||
bruh really
Is the question solved @inland vale ?
well, the channel is going to be closed if youāll be gone
are you fine with that?
.close
Closed by @surreal relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
have a good night 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this server sucks!!
well, I think the server is generally quite good tbr
We don't do aftersell services
but this is also not a help channel question so uhh
Hi higher! Bye higher!
.close
Closed by @surreal relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
peak
.forceclose (sorry test)
.disapear
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #āhow-to-get-help for instructions).
Do to discussy fr
yes sir
ig new channel also works
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got this question on my test. I chose A and it is correct, but now as I look at it, I am not sure I understand why it is correct. I differentiated it and at that point it was 0, but isn't the same true about E, for example?
This is what I get for E
You don't know if $f'(0)$ is defined or undefined
Ę( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
that's still considered a critical point
What if $0$ is a point where the function tends to infty
Ę( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
I think you're right, I don't see why E isn't correct
are you sure the question didn't have multiple correct options
No(
tbh I didn't even look at E when I was doing the test lol, I just chose A when I calculated its derivative
but now I am super confused
I think @sharp smelt is right, there can be a problem where f diverges at x=0
A is the only one we can be sure about
something like f(x) = 1/x(x+1)
x_0 = -1/2 is a critical point
but f((x-x_0)^2) won't
yup
can you please explain once again why we are entirely sure in A? for these cases
wait no this is incorrect
it should be +
but still, not a critical point
.close
Closed by @ivory musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
p
Find the shaded area
at first i thought about using integers for the base which all adds up to 12
i assumed the two small triangles are equal and is a, and the left triangle is b, and the biggest is c
2a + b + c = 12
And tried multiple combinations
tried a = 2, b = 3, c = 5.
And got 30
a = 1, b = 3, c = 7
And got 30 as well
but apparently my friend told me itās 36
Just by seeing the question i also assumed itās 30
@golden bolt Has your question been resolved?
Nvm i got it
Closed by @golden bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I have question about a proof of polynomial remained theorem.
In the wiki page for it ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial_remainder_theorem#Using_Euclidean_division ), the proof declares g(x) as the divisor, then defines it as g(x) = x - r without excluding x = r from the domain (due to it being divisor and anything divided by 0 is undefined). Later on, we use g(r) to find the remainder. Is this proof incorrect or am I missing something?
In algebra, the polynomial remainder theorem or little BĆ©zout's theorem (named after Ćtienne BĆ©zout) is an application of Euclidean division of polynomials. It states that, for every number
r
,
{\displaystyle r,}
any polynomial
f
(
x
)
...
x-r is a polynomial of degree 1, x is a symbol and not a number
polynomial division is initially just symbolically
later you can substitute x=r into the result you get
If I substitute x = r, then the divisor is r - r = 0
f(g) divided by (x - r) is only defined when x is not r
Polynomial division is not the same as number division. You treat the x as a symbol, not a number
also note that no "division" takes place, it is merely an equation f(x) = Q(x)g(x) + R(x) which holds true regardless of if you can divide by g
if (x - r) divides f(x) we can write f(x) = (x - r)g(x). sub x = r we have that f(r) = 0
conversely suppose f(r) =0 then thanks to the division algorithm we have f(x) = q(x)(x-r) + r(x)
sub x = r gives f(r) = r(x) = 0. since there is no remainder (x -r) divides f(x) as desired
I understand the proof, this little details of g(x) being divisor represented as x - r without excluding x = r was what bugged me
But from the other answers I think I kind of started getting it by treating polynomial division differently from number division
why can't x =r?
Because x - r is divisor, and if x = r then x - r = 0, and we can't have division by 0 as it is undefined
do you see division happening?
But as Blake said, there is no division taking place, it's defined as multiplication
absolutely no division
being a divisor does not mean do division
4 is a divisor of 8 because 4*2 = 8
not because 8/4 = 2
the process of polynomial division is really just a smart way to make sure that the polynomial Q(x)(x-r) + R actually ends up being f(x)
and note that even for numbers, we can actually use the division algorithm to "divide" by 0
the result will just be that the remainder is your original number
aka n = k*0 + n
so even for numbers, we arent actually really dividing, we are more like trying to work backwards from the product
which is kind off the same thing but kind of not quite
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @fathom coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, it's me again.
My question is maybe a continuation of literally the previous question in this thread, but I went in a rabbit hole for definitions of certain operations.
The euclidean division proof of polynomial remainder theorem is described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial_remainder_theorem.
It goes to a form f(x) = Q(x)(x-r) + R.
In euclidean division formula a = bq + r, what is corresponding to the 'b' is actually (x-r), but we have constraint that b must be different than 0.
Then we go on and place 'b' as zero in our proof.
If we follow the same logic, we can prove anything.
Assume f(x) divided by (x-a) gives a remainder of 3.
f(x) = Q(x)(x-a) + 3 , then
f(a) = Q(a)(a-a) + 3 ,
f(a) = Q(a)*0 + 3 = 3 , then f(a) would always be equal to 3.
But we can use the same logic for any other remainder, which leads to contradictions.
In algebra, the polynomial remainder theorem or little BĆ©zout's theorem (named after Ćtienne BĆ©zout) is an application of Euclidean division of polynomials. It states that, for every number
r
,
{\displaystyle r,}
any polynomial
f
(
x
)
...
Now this theorem has another proof which might be correct, but my point is that in Euclidean division proof, we are performing banned operations (that a = bq + r such that b is not 0). From that I conclude that is is not an actual rigorous proof of the theorem (even though another rigorous proof could exist)
So am I right that this 'proof' is not rigorous, or it is rigorous and I am missing something from the definition of operations (as described in the wiki articles)?
I think that when you take the division algorithm for polynomials, the constraint that b is not 0 just means that $g(x) \neq 0$
Ari
In this case, we use $g(x) = x-r$, which, yes, has a zero at $x=r$, but this doesn't go against the division algorithm
Ari
basically, the divisor just can't be the 0 function. It's allowed to have zeroes, and the division algorithm still holds when evaluated at the function's zeroes
so if g(x) must be different than 0, then x - r must be different than 0
so x must be different than r, but we plug in r as an input to g
g(x) = x - r , g(x) != 0 , x - r != 0 => x != r => r is not in the domain of the function
g(r) = 0 doesn't mean that g(x) = 0
The divison algorithm just says g(x) can't be the zero function
It doesn't say that g(x) can't have any zeroes
I am not saying that g(r) = 0, I am saying that g(r) is undefined
because it is used as the 'b' in a = bq + r ( b != 0 )
You're misunderstanding the polynomial divison algorithm
when it says g(x) is nonzero, it just means g(x) isn't the zero function
g(x) = x-r in this case
g(x) is allowed to equal zero at certain values of x
but if g(x) is allowed to equal zero, then it doesn't follow the formula for euclidean division anymore, as it is only defined when g(x) is not 0
And what do you mean exactly by "the zero function"? I am not sure I understand what is the zero function and that might be the reason I don't fully understand you. Is it just 0 or is it something more special?
And I have learned just today the formula of polynomial division algorithm, so it's highly likely I don't fully understand it
The zero function is g(x) = 0, where every value in the domain gets mapped to 0
so g(x) = x-r is not the zero function
Euclidean division is only used when you're looking at the entire function, not specific values.
So g(x) here is not the zero function, so we can use the division algorithm to get
f(x) = (x-r)q(x) + r(x)
Then, we can plug in values of x. Euclidean division doesn't matter more after we've gotten to this point
But as far as I can see in the wiki article, the proof depends on euclidean division, which is defined as a = bq + r
now I get that we could plug in any x in f(x), except that I don't get why we can plug in the value 'r'
because even if g(x) is not the zero function, there are values of 'x' that produce 0 as output of the g function
and if g(x) = b in the formula, and b != 0, then g(x) must also be different than 0
so this leads me to conclusion that the domain of g function must exclude the inputs that output 0
Euclidean division isn't exactly the same for polynomials as it is for integers
This is extra fancy terminology but the ring of integers are the ring of polynomials with integer coefficients are different euclidean domains and so euclidean division doesn't work the exact same
In general, for euclidean division, you just need the divisor to be nonzero in that ring
In polynomials, the zero is just g(x) = 0. Any other polynomial allows euclidean division
and it doesn't matter if that polynomial happens to have some zeroes. The division algorithm stil works
i'm kinda confused, you've proved the remainder theorem which is true?
if f(x) leaves remainder 3 when divided by (x-a), then f(a) = 3
not sure what you mean by any other remainder?
They're confused that the divison algorithm for integers says that
a = bq +r requires b to be nonzero
And at x=r, g(x)=x-r is 0, so they think the divison algorithm does not apply for x=r
oh right ic makes sense
Ari, I am a bit lost with the ring terminology
you said that euclidean division is not exactly the same for polynomials as it is for integers
So I am using the description from wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial_greatest_common_divisor#Euclidean_division
In algebra, the greatest common divisor (frequently abbreviated as GCD) of two polynomials is a polynomial, of the highest possible degree, that is a factor of both the two original polynomials. This concept is analogous to the greatest common divisor of two integers.
In the important case of univariate polynomials over a field the polynomial GC...
which still states that b != 0
there's a slightly confusing bit of terminology when we say f(x) = 0
here what 0 means is not that there is some integer x that makes f(x) = 0
it means that f(x) is not identically 0
think of it like this - there's many different number systems out theer
i.e. the integers etc.
the integers is the number system that you're most familiar with, but there are other such number systems too
one such number system is R[X], the set of polynomials with real coefficients
when we think about R[X], we're not thinking about them as functions or anything of the sort, we are interpreting this number system as just stuff of the form a_n X^n + ... + a_0
now the "0" for this number system would be 0 and "1" would be 1
(0 polynomial not a polynomial equalling 0)
every nice enough number system has its own division algorithm
where just like how with integers, i can divide a by b to get a=qb+r
that holds for every nice number system
(the formal name for this is a Euclidean domain - it's not too hard to prove that R[X] is a euclidean domain but take it as a fact for now)
so it means that in our fancy number system of R[X], that means i can divide one expression by another to get a remainder
so i.e. a(X) = p(X)b(X) + r(X)
I think I am following
Is there more to it, or?
@grim fractal I re-read everything you said, and from what I understand is that if I look at the wiki article for euclidean division, it means that if 'b' is the function g(x), then g(x) must not be the zero function, but it can be a function who has zero outputs. I guess that this will start making sense when (or if) I get to rings, but for now I should accept that g(x) is any function that has at least one output different than 0?
Yes, pretty much
I think this all makes more sense when you learn about rings, but for now, the division algorithm for polynomials applies as long as g(x) isn't the zero function
Got it, I will take your word and hope to fully understand this one day
Thank you all for giving me different perspectives to think about this š

.close
Closed by @fathom coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In the diagram below, lines $k$ and $\ell$ are parallel. Find the measure of angle $x$ in degrees.
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
one of those lines is just a distraction
actually i'm not sure you even need k
<@&268886789983436800>

