#help-39
1 messages · Page 157 of 1
yeah ig they didn't
ahhh so i see now a transpose becomes [2 1][x1; x2] = 3?
yeah
2x1 + 1x2 = 3?
yeah
not obvious if you see it for the first time
i thought vectors have the arrow on it
I just jumped right into it, cause ik what an hyperplane is alr
that's for highschoolers, so they don't get confused
I just used x and y instead of x1 x2
just so that it looks more like the usual equations of lines
why'd they give that hint? is there a way to see if it's convex through graphing it or something?
if you're able to graph a hyperplane in R^12 I'm all ears
it's just to get your mind going with a simple example
wait is this a convex function or a convex set?
convex set
cause i know for convex function we need all lines for all points to be above the function
there's no function here
oh so then its a set so we just use that rule
for x, y in R^2 and a in [0, 1] ax + (1-a)y in r2?
say H is your hyperplane, you want to show that
for all x, y in H, a in [0, 1], (1-a)x + ay in H
im just confused because you say its a set but i can graph it too
oh so all the points that make up that functigon line
yea
this seems doable i'll try it with the 2 dimentional one but my only curiosity is how i would do it for a general hyperplane now
just use the equation that defines the hyperplane
what does it mean for x and y to be in the hyperplane?
what does it mean for (1-t)x + ty to be in the hyperplace ?
@atomic pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I need to clarify something about bounds, so I have a set defined for n>=2 and I am to find the best upper bound and lower bound of the set does that mean i have to find sup(A) and inf(A) based on n or just based on the smallest and greatest over all values of n?
just for each case n
Closed by @hushed galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I just realised that it says A_n so there are multiple sets so it was obvious
.close
Closed by @hushed galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im on (c)
@mild tartan Has your question been resolved?
what have you done so far
@mild tartan Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
jkj
@deft quiver Has your question been resolved?
Have you tried a substitution?
is u basically x?
u is u
so wouldnt u be the substitution then?
You wanna use another variable
other than u
x works, but the substitution u = x is useless
what would you suggest then
bacc (unhelpful)
gotcha and then the derivative of that would be 3u^2 right?
yes
bacc (unhelpful)
when do i substitute that dertivate
,, \dd u = \frac{1}{3u^2} : {\dd x}
bacc (unhelpful)
You also substitute the differential du
this is the part that i get stuck on lol
I dont know hwo to implemnt these into the integral
bacc (unhelpful)
We know what u^3+1 is and du
,, \int_0^2 4u^2 \sqrt{\textcolor{cyan}{u^3+1}} : \textcolor{green}{\dd u} = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} 4u^2 \sqrt{\textcolor{cyan}{x}} \cdot \textcolor{green}{\frac{1}{3u^2} : \dd x}
bacc (unhelpful)
ohhhh
i see
the color coding works haha
now wouldnt you put 4 outside the integral because its a constant?
and the 1/3
so 4/3
x_1 and x_2 denote the new bounds for our integral
ok imma write this stuff down
Now either you figure out the new bounds or you "keep" the old ones, but then after integration you must resubstitute
I think i solve using the bounds given
I wouldn't
The new bounds are easy to find
You use the substitution equation
x = u³+1
Now lower bound was u=0
so new lower bound is x = 0³+1 = 1
old upper bound was u=2
so new upper bound is x = 2³+1 = 8+1 = 9
bacc (unhelpful)
hm ok I dont know if I have learned to make new bounds yet but i can run that by with my TA
but thank you
theres one more questions that I was working on and using two different online website to help me find the answer and it was contradictory so I dont know if im on the right track
ok
first thing I noticed
that should have been a +
sorry if its really confusing how i was working on it haha
bacc (unhelpful)
You started with [ \frac{1}{4} \left ( 3 \cdot \int \frac{1}{x} : \dd x + 2 \cdot \int \frac{1}{x^2} : \dd x - \int \frac{1}{x^3} : \dd x \right )]
bacc (unhelpful)
oh yes thats right
so this is the final integration right and from that i add in the bounds
ys
Have a great day.
thanks you too
wait i have one more question, how do you know when to use substitution, does it just depend on what youre working with?
Whenever your integral looks hard to compute straight away, you wanna simplify it
Substitution is all about making your integral easier to compute
@deft quiver Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
P(t) = 7500 + 3000sin((pi*t)/8). How do we find the second time where P(t) = 10000.
@spiral sage Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let me translate it
Is it the good method for having the good equivalance class ?
z is (x,y) and z1 = (x_1,y_1)
and I'm trying to find all the element of the class (0,1)
@sweet condor Nan bg c'est pas bon là
Oh coucou :D
Je vois pas alors ce que je dois faire pour trouver les elements
Déjà une erreure simple
Quand t'as pris la racine carré des 2 côtés t'as pas mis +-
$\pm$
jan Lapiwin is also jan Niku
genre ça
La consigne de base c'est "SI R est une relation d'equivalance, que représentent les classses (0,1) (0,0) (1,0) ? Donner une illustration de ces classes dansle plan des réels
Comment ?
Il a encore 2 solution dans les 2 les equation ?
-2 et ou 2
-sqrt(2) et sqrt(2) plutôt
OH ousp
bah là c'est pareil
Si t'as x^2=y^2-1 alors ça te fait 2 solutions:
- x=sqrt(y^2-1)
- x=-sqrt(y^2-1)
Ouais, super
Ah -x j'ai oublié d'ecire le -
Bon, maintenant, le problème principal
Ta solution c'était (sqrt(y^2-1);sqrt(x^2+1))
hm hm
Donc ton x est défini à partir de y et ton y est défini à partir de x
pas très pratique hein
en effet j'ai pas idée...
je me suis basé sur l'explication d'une vidéo
Sinon côté graphique ca va pour l'instant (il faudra que je mettent la verison negative aussi)
En fait maintenant que t'as la relation exacte entre x et y vaut mieux choisir une seule des 2 variables et définir l'une selon l'autre
Je sais pas si cette phrase est claire
Oui, ce serait une bonne idée
mais que y je le change pour avoir que des x
oui
dernière question
Tu pourrais aussi faire l'inverse mais je pense que ce sera plus facile de toute définir en terme de x
On est pas sensé avoir un couple a la fin ?
Oui mais je note comme tu as fait ?
grossomodo oui
@sweet condor Bref, donc si tu fais ce que tu viens de dire, t'obtiens quoi?
let me write it down
hm ?
Faut vérifier que sqrt(x^2+1) et -sqrt(x^2+1) soient tous les deux dans R
Parce que, si par exemple on avait plutôt (x;sqrt(x+2)) et que on choisissait x=-3 alors en y on aurait sqrt(-3+2)=sqrt(-1), ce qui n'est pas dans R
pour x = 0 on a sqrt(1) et -sqrt(1)
x^2 est toujours positive
Quand tu fait lequation du 2nd degré avec tu obtiendra un delta negative
le signe de x^2 + 1 est donc positif sur R
Exactement
On conclus que sqrt(x^2 +1) et -sqrt(x^2+1) est dans R
yess
Donc tu peux dire "pour tout x dans R" (avec la notation que vous utilisez)
sans problème
@sweet condor D'autres questions?
Oui
Mais j'ai envie de finir de régier cette question
Est-ce que je peux liberer le channel et te demander en pv quand je bloque encore ?
Oui
Pour ça faut envoyer la commande .close
.close
Closed by @sweet condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have you tried
mods?
I DMed ModMail
please stop closing and opening new channels
I tried to find the an part
So I kinda tried just Geometric and Arithmetic
which did not work
its arithemtic
and it's like a mumbo jumbo of confusion
nope harmonic
the an = a1 (n - 1)d?
its an = 1/(a1 + (n - 1)d)
why are you opening and closing channels
all the terms of arithmetic have been reciprocated
you can reopen the same one if you need to, and if you don't stop wasting channels
<@&268886789983436800> I do not feel comfortable around Ren. If I address it I know things will get worst so I kept leaving until he stops following through every channel I made.
you can DM @spare sparrow if you feel uncomfortable around them
1/? but
yes and he said arithmetic
its not arithmatic bro
If you have an actual problem for a specific reason then message modmail, even if you do you can block them and I don't see how that justifies opening multiple channels when its not stopping anyone from viewing the new one
this is getting confusing which one is it?
harmonic
Okay
^
n / [1/x1 + 1/x2 + 1/x3 + ... + 1/xn]?
if arithmatic is 2, 4, 6, 8 ....
harmonic is 1/2, 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, ...
what will be a1?
a1 is not 1/2
a1 is 2
lmao
1/2?
how can you like get simple formula where you have to substiture 1 single term wrong
a1 = 1/2
i just assumed it was eight
nopeee
right
yeah
yupp
So again.
an = 1/(2 + (n - 1)d)
yess
yes
d is?
yes
ok whatever i forgot those things
np
an = 1/(2 + (n - 1)2)
You've already been muted before for public drama, stop dragging things into public and breaking server rules or being disruptive as a result. I can't dm you this either because you have them turned off.
If you need to, just block and ignore anyone you don't like, and if there's a serious enough thing they've done that would be banworthy then just let modmail know. There's no reason for anything in between.
It's kinda been how many mins since it just didn't discuss it
I kinda think Your making a fuss about it now considering it's already done
I'm warning you because you'll be banned if you repeat things like this
You could have warned me during that discussion
I checked your post history and tried to DM you first
How
Like
All I did was
1/(2 + (n - 1)2
1/(2 + 2n - 2)
1/(2n)
^
this is correct
oops
limits on n are wrong
oh
rest is good
n = 0?
@oak quiver
this is the lower limit
then an = 1/12
this will be upper limit
nopee
Hmm
^
what is an?
yes
limits are that
soo
1/12 upper limit
but isn't the upper limit 1/14?
and the lower limit n = 7
??
@oak quiver
1/2
now what is an?
1
?
wsit
1/(2n)
silly error lol
....
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing—and saving your progress—now: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/cc-third-grade-math/arithmetic-patterns-and-problem-solving/imp-patterns-in-arithmetic/v/practice-finding-patterns-in-numbers
Learn how to spot a pattern in a sequence of numbers, such as 3, 6, 9, 12...
Practice this l...
You might wanna see this
thnx bro
sorry
its fine
yes
So..
1/(2n) = 1/14?
n = 12/14?
...
^
ye

HUH??
cross multiply
1/2n = 1/14
n = 1/14 - 1/2..
What are you guys talking about
Ohhhh
okay-
yeah but you would get 1/n not n
cross multiplication better
so that's it?
yup
simplify lol
yeah so what is n?
IM DISBELIEF
I FEEL LIKE IM NOT SUPPOSE TO BELIEVE PEMDAS ANYMORE
THIS IS CONFUSING
NO MORE DIVIDE BOTH SIDES
NO MORE GETTING N
NO MORE N = SOMETHING SOMETHING NUMBERS
AS IN GONE??
OUT OF THIS TOPIC???
NOT MORE???
?
LIKE
im super confused
I JUST DID DIVIDE BOTH SIDES
DID LIKE n = 14/2
BECAUSE THAT WAS LITERALLY TAUGHT LIKE THAT
MY WHOLE ENTIRE LIFE
yeah that is all correct
ohh lol
NO MORE CONFUSING THINGS NO MORE STEPS??
simplify this pls
n = 7
^ 
2n = 14 ??
^
limits are 1 and 7
n cant be a fraction
n being a fraction doesnt make any sense
istg
...
upper ofc
do you know what limits is?
?
n = 7
∑ 1/(2n)
1 and 10 are the limits in this sigma
...
lower limit?
PLS TALK IN MORE THAN 1 WORD
0!!
MORE THAN 1 WORD
2???
MORE THAN1 WORD
3??
ISTG SAY SOME SENTENCES
THREE
WHAT IS THA SOMETHING?
it's something
IDK
Like
IT'S MORE THAN 1
LESS THAN 1
THEN WHAT??
1.5?
0.5??
@oak quiver
IDK WHAT IS MORE THAN 1 AND LESS THAN 1
0 AND 2 IS THE CLOSEST GUESS I CAN DO
BUT NO
IT'S WRONG
IDK WHAT IM GUESSING HERE
THE CLOSEST GUESS I CAN MAKE OUT OFF THIS IS 2
MORE THAN 1
ong..
Bro saying more than 1
I answer 2
and still wrong
what a jerk
<@&286206848099549185> Help
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
hai
are you from which country
I answered
2
cause 2 is more than 1
Logical thing
but then It's wrong
Just give me another way to do this
I don't have my limits
?
∑ 1/(2n)
?
what?
sigma notation
!status please
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
bro an = 1/(2n)
she just needs help with the limits
like n = what to what
Let me get my paraphrase
im not american lol
THAT'S WHY IM USING PARAPHRASE
Here
To expand the expression for Sigma Notation, we need to clarify what the summation is representing. Sigma notation, denoted by the Greek letter Σ, is used to represent the sum of a sequence of terms. The general form of a summation in sigma notation is:
[
\sum_{i=a}^{b} f(i)
]
Where:
- (i) is the index of summation.
- (a) is the lower limit of summation.
- (b) is the upper limit of summation.
- (f(i)) is the function or expression being summed.
If you have a specific function (f(i)) and limits for (n), please provide those details. However, if we assume a general case where (n) is the upper limit and we start from (1), the expansion would look like this:
[
\sum_{i=1}^{n} f(i) = f(1) + f(2) + f(3) + \ldots + f(n)
]
For example, if (f(i) = i), then:
[
\sum_{i=1}^{n} i = 1 + 2 + 3 + \ldots + n
]
If you have a specific function or context in mind, please provide that, and I can give a more tailored expansion!
The solution for Sigma Notation is n = 1.
キオ
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Is that long enough for you?
lmao
what i meant was
instead of saying 1 or 2
say i think the lower limit should be 1
n = 1
this way i am sure what you are trying to say
again
OH WAIT PARAPHRASE
^
is this chatgpt?
I am trying to make my sentences longer for you
this is good enough for me
n = -1?
!img
Please post images (such as PNGs or JPGs) of the question rather than other filetypes such as PDFs which have to be downloaded. Non-image downloads can potentially contain viruses or other security risks.
lower limit should be 1
"i think it should be -1"
its important so that i understand what you are saying
se all my above messages
they arent 1 words
WE ARE DISCUSSING LOWER LIMITS HOW CAN YOU EVEN FORGET THE TOPIC
ok so the limits are?
1/14 and n = 1
(lets say that i had instead said n=? would you hve undertood)
pls
WAIT NOW YOU KNOW MY PAIN
I AM NOT FAST AT MATH
YOU ARE NOT FAST AT WORDS
AHA!
50 = 50
i was being sarcastic lmao
use this format for this
.
i think it should be 1/14 and n = 1
also use words like lower limit and upper limit
srsly?
YES.
also use words like lower limit and upper limit
okay
So
Lower limit is n = 1
Upper limit 1/14
no
..
that is not the upper limit nor the lower limit
you seem to have been right the first time saying that the lower limit is 1
but you say you are summing 1/2n from n = 1 to some upper limit that you havent found yet
if your last term is 1/14, you need your upper limit to correspond to 1/14 when you plug it into what youre summing
ie the 1/2n
2n = 14?
yes
this is the upper limit
the 'n' value corresponding to first term and last term
are the lower and upper limits respectively
2n = 14
∑ 1/(2n)
1
simplify the 2n=14
n = 14/2
more simplify
n = 7
yes
Another questions
Write arithmetic if the sequence is arithmetic. Write geometric if the sequence is
geometric. Write Fibonacci if the sequence is Fibonacci. Write Neither if the sequence is neither arithmetic, geometric, nor Fibonacci.
- -6, 1, 8, 15, 22
- 1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243,
- 𝑘, 𝑘 + 4, 𝑘 + 8, 𝑘 + 12
- 9, 12, 21, 33, 54
- −2, 2, −2, 2
- 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, …
- 11, 12, 14, 17, 21
<@&286206848099549185>
Do you know what are the general forms that arithmatic and geometric sequences take?
Or what the fibonacci sequence is
Idk fibonacci sequence
arithmetic..
next will be 1+2=3, 3+2=5, 5+3=8 ....
so the series will be 1, 2, 3, 5 ,8 ....
Okay okay
Thats why its called a sequence
Ye
Can you write a general form for it tho?
so the first one is?
nope
arithmetic
it can be using funcions f(n) = f(n-1) + f(n-2) but not sigma
then
a_n=a_(n-1)+a_(n-2) for n>2
yes
then?
Write arithmetic if the sequence is arithmetic. Write geometric if the sequence is
geometric. Write Fibonacci if the sequence is Fibonacci. Write Neither if the sequence is neither arithmetic, geometric, nor Fibonacci.
- -6, 1, 8, 15, 22
- 1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243,
- 𝑘, 𝑘 + 4, 𝑘 + 8, 𝑘 + 12
- 9, 12, 21, 33, 54
- −2, 2, −2, 2
- 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, …
- 11, 12, 14, 17, 21
im gonna recommend say it like this
number 2 is geometric
its correct
SORRY
number 3?
nope
I'm not literally guessing
?
Fibonacci is basically the sum of the 2 previous terms in a sequence
I know it's arithmetic because the meaning of it revolves around addition
its arithmatic because the diff of adjacent terms is constant
what does geometric mean?
It revolves around multiplication
in this form ^
I don't speak math language...
Ngl fair point
So number 3, Arithmetic
Fibonacci
why?
Looks cool
!da2a
looks like it..
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Neither?
nope
Geometric
For 4 the reason its fibonacci because starting from the 3rd term its the sum of the previous two terms, and for the 4th its also the sum of the previous 2 terms and goes like that
Fibonacci
Arithmetic
how?
Lets assume x=theta
11 + 1 = 12 + 2 = 14 + 3 = 17 + 4 = 21
Exactly xdddd
but the diff isnt constant
yes it is
^
first its 1
then 2 then 3
its increasing
thats isnt an AP
well it's not a fibonnaci because the sequence doesn't add up to the 3rd term
You cant generalise it in the form of a_n=a_1+(n-1)r with r being a constant difference
It's not geometric because it doesn't multiply to the 2nd term
So it's arithmetic
Oh wait..
Thats correct but that doesnt mean its arithmetic
It's not arithmetic because the common difference is not constant neither..
Mhm
Neither
Soooo
Bye wumpus man
it was for her but ok?
.close
Closed by @languid nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! I would need some help solving this
Using geometric sums
I understand from that our first invested capital will be compounded 59 times, since the last investment of 600 wont be compounded.
Yeah he is investing every month, compound interest has just one capital at beginning of investment
what?
Nvm, I am not aware of such questions sorry
Oh okey np
Im just wondering since the 600 last month wont be compounded, will it be like this ?
So first payment will be compounded 59 times, second payment will be compounded 58 times and so on..
ahh
I dont understand someone help me D:
.
@sharp pewter Has your question been resolved?
Alr I solved the other question.
But for this, where the function is increasing or decreasing, do i just do the derivative and find the critical points and then a sign diagram ?
yes
@sharp pewter Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @sharp pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Closed by @sharp pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please help em
@gusty moss Has your question been resolved?
😭
@gusty moss Has your question been resolved?
yeah but
i get a cubic
and idk where to go
Show all your work
its sending
there
the . on top of the 1 is dust its not i
Doesn't look like you finished reducing yet
Also because you left out a, b, c that messed up your row reducing steps
did i?
i thought the arithemtic was right
Restart with the a, b, c in tact and see
ok
@plush bramble
is this right
No
.
i dont get the point of this
why do we need a b c?
😐 i dont understand why
fuck
@gusty moss Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @gusty moss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm trying to understand how to demonstrate the truth of a limit, so I was looking on this website and the first step of the demonstration is the following
I was wondering why. My theory is that i'm trying to demonstrate that the difference between f(x) and 0 should be very small when x-->2, therefore it should be included in the interval (-epsilon; epsilon) which is arbitrarily small. Is that it?
Yes exactly
@pine wadi Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pine wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me figure this out thx!
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @warm sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if X is a compact set, show S is compact
A set is compact if it is closed and bounded, that is the definition I have
so proving S is bounded is not too difficult, what is a good way to show S is closed?
Is X a subset of R
hi
@midnight reefi rly need help with calculus
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
where should i go?
i sent one message and the room got deleted almost instantly
that's a no ig
Did you read #❓how-to-get-help
read #❓how-to-get-help
It got moved, not deleted
thxxxxxx
And make sure you have the occupied channels expanded so you see those which are all read too
taking an element $z \in \bar{S}$ implies that for all $\epsilon > 0$, we have $(z - \epsilon, z+\epsilon) \cap S \neq \emptyset$
Halex
being that I want to prove $\bar{S} = S$
Halex
How do you know z is real number
Even if S was a subset of R, can we tell that taking an element in its closure would implie it is a real number?
You have to use that X is compact
In R, closed and bounded subsets are equivalent to compact
Taking a sequence is better for this case then?
Better is just what you're comfortable with
Oh, but would it work if I show there's a sequence converging to x + y?
Your sequences have that form, so should their limits if they come from X
How do I know the closure is not empty?
Well, the set S itself is not empty and S is contained in its closure
but I showed x+y is in the closure of S

