#help-39
1 messages · Page 134 of 1
the name rahul and alok in your worksheet shows that youre probably an indian
makes sense
im indian too anyways how did yall get the answer im stilkl stuck
i can't even start
Sum of page numbers on the last leaf is 63, that means 2n-1=63
n=32 which is the number on the last page of the book. Probably 16 leafs in the unripped book.
That means both sides had an even 8 pages.
To get the sum of page numbers to a maximum while still having an even-odd split we can remove the first page of the book.
The sum of the page numbers will be 64•65/2-3
If I read it correctly
That's way too large
Let us check again first case odd so 2n-1
Second case even so 2n
Totally = 2n-1+2n=4n-1
4n-1 is of the form??
how did u get the last linetho
you need to remove pages from the second half
there are 32 pages so 16 leaves
i suppose remove two from the second half and one from the first?
Didn't do that
So first one from the first half and first 2 ones from the second half
The sum on all numbers from 1 to n is n(n+1)/2
451 is the answer?
i think that means you miss 1, 2, 17, 18, 19, and 20?
im getting 390 😦
yep im failing
32*33/2 = 528 so subtracting 77 would give… 451?
oh cool we agree
and look at that it’s even one of the options
the correct answer is 451
Oh my algebra's totally wrong
(book has answers too)
ok it seems everyone agrees
That’s what I did
yeeah!
no it isnt the 1st 3 lines are correct
- the last leaf adds to 63
- so the last two pages are 31 and 32
- there are 16 leaves, 8 in each half
- we need to remove leaves from both halves so that the first half has an odd number of leaves and the second half has an even number of leaves
those are the main steps needed to solve it
- we remove 1 leaves from first half and 2 from second half
- minimise the numbers on the removed leaves: 1, 2 for the first half; 17, 18, 19, 20 for the second half
dayum ur all smartiess
Convinced as well
- sum of all pages in book is 32*33/2 = 528
- sum of removed pages is 1+2+17+18+19+20 = 77
- 528-77 = 451
this is my solution
the formula for a sw
holy
series
the formula to calculate the sum of a series till the nth term is the (nth term(nth term+1))/2
but the series should be in arithmetic progression
+1
eg 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
like that
Okay that was a great question!! @lean orbit
thank you all
.
And
for helping me
ill be back with more questions soon as i don't wanna
even tho i didnt contribute
fail
byee
may i close this?
sure
.close
Closed by @lean orbit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Everything I wrote had wrong numbers plugged in oh yh except 16,32
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i get (sinAcosB + cosAsinB) (sinAcosB - cosAsinB)
diff of 2 squares so
(sinAcosB)^2 - (cosAsinB)^2
What do I do from there
you do what you have to do
wow
Hmm maybe try using pythagorean identity to express cos(B)^2 and cos(A)^2 in terms of sin
then it should all simplify nicely
remember (sinx)^2 + (cosx)^2 = 1?
try using that
ill try astars method first it seems simplier
Spoiler: ||They are the same method lol||
pythagorean identity is (sinx)^2 + (cosx)^2 = 1?
yeah, sorry. I didn't know you don't know the name "pythagorean identity"
1-sinx^^2*
yeah that works too
yes
alright thank you
im so confused
you sure?
yes
when i eval sin75 square - sin15 squared i get root 3 on 2
why not just let A = 75 and B = 15
yeah thats right
I dont see how that helps?
wot
So now we know that sin(45+30)sin(45-30) = 1/4
how is it helpful?
How is sin75sin15 = 1/4 helpful?
i didnt say its 1/4, they said its 1/4 which i assumed they got by calculating
how is answer helpful
but thats after using the identity that we just proved above
hmm when i put it into verif mode its false
but you are supposed to find this
nvm im dumb
^
@uncut coral Has your question been resolved?
@uncut coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you solve this?
you start by guessing a solution using the rational root theorem
then you use polynomial division and then quadratic formula
u could start by splitting -3x to -4x + x and see if u are able to factorise anything
@cunning stump Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cunning stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey ppl, um anyone maybe help me with that? https://discord.com/channels/268882317391429632/1271438594296385556 ( im sorry i know i should not post it here, but i really need it :< don't even know where to start solving )
@crisp walrus Has your question been resolved?
Please do not advertise your help channel or thread in other parts of the server. There are many people who need help, so advertising can quickly turn into spam.
@crisp walrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
nvm
help
ask in an available help channel
@nova kestrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @nova kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what am I doing wrong here?
Looks ok to me
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get confirmation this is the right way to do this
i said coeff, but its just the term whoops
constant coeff = constant term
because multiplying by x^0 = 1 changes nothing
this is the right way
Closed by @sterile turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I'm studyin projective geometry, I don't have any idea of how to approach this exercise, the book never give an example with numbers, only theory, but, I don't know how to use that theory to solve the exercise, I know that P^2 means that the vectorial space is V^3, but, I don't sure if just use geogebra graph the two points and draw the line between them it's the solution, in advance thank you <3
@white coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help with 9 pls
@sterile turtle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$$\begin{vmatrix}
bc-a^2&ca-b^2&ab-c^2\
ca-b^2&ab-c^2&bc-a^2\
ab-c^2&bc-a^2&ca-b^2\end{vmatrix}$$
kheerii
how do I simplify this
is that supposed to be a det or a matrix
determinant
Not too sure, sorry.
all good
kheerii
I have this till now
oh wait shit
just R3 -> R3 - R2 now
I think
no that doesn't help nvm
i don't know if that would help but i just noticed (1 , 1 , 1) is an eigenvector of this matrix xD
how did you manage to find that out lmao
I just added all columns 😂
first thing I do in any matrix problem is add all columns before even reading what i want
well the matrix is symmetric too which means the eigenvectors are orthogonal
and we landed one of them so we know one of the eigenvalues
if we can somehow find just one more eigenvalue
we can use the trace to get the third
then multiply them to get the determinant
you know the product of eigenvalues is the determinant of the matrix right
no
we haven't even been taught eigenvalues yet
though I know what they are/ how to calculate them
the exercise just expected us to use properties of determinants
oh nevermind then, i guess i went too far xD
no it's all good your way is probably faster
but not the way required of me unfortunately
my way relies more on guessing, so it's not systematic. probably why it isn't prefered. i didn't see a way to simplify it yet to be honest so I will look into it
alright thanks!
@inland ivy Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @inland ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i start
@vestal venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I have a question: integrate sin^(x) wrt sin^(x). On solving this by 2 methods, first by replacing d(sin^(x)) with (cosx)dx and other method is direct substitution of sinx by t.
wdym by integrate
$\sin^x$
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
I think I spelled sin^2 by mistake and then forgot to erase ^
it was just sinx
wrt sinx
is*
ahk, so
$$\int\sin(x)\dd(\sin(x))$$
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
udu?
This is equivalent to integral of u du which is u²/2 + c
Yeah
In your case u = sinx
No, don't do that
why?
Not that you can't, but there's no need to do it
it’s the integral of udu
actually I wanted to verify the answer of this method by first method
thats why I converted
Ahn ok
All fine, that's just a constant, that's why you have to write + C when finding indefinite integrals
Or you mean 1/4 multiplied?
so whenever I get a numerical constant in integral I just assume it a additional whole of C?
If it's added/substracted to the primitive you found, yes
C is just a name for "some unknown number"
I see, then that answers to my doubt
You're welcome
Closed by @quiet goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
¿Two unit vectors in 2D that are independent are necessarily orthogonal?
1/sqrt(2) is different of zero
thank you, another quick question ¿rotate with respect to the origin and translate produce the same effect on a 2D point, regardless of the order in which they are performed?
Nope, the order matters
You're welcome 🤗
.close
Closed by @white coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@surreal magnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @surreal magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I figured out a periodic function that when integrated from 0 to 2pi gets you the area of a circle, and if the circle has a hole, you can simply treat that hole (as long as the hole is also a circle lol) as the same function and subtract that from the first function and still get the area in the end
(-cos(x) + 1) * (r^2 /2)
I like -cos just because it starts at 0 and goes up lol
so for an annulus the formula would be (-cos(x) + 1) * (r^2 /2) - (-cos(x) + 1) * (r^2 /2)
the idea is to take any 2d closed surface, and turn it into a sum of 1d continuous periodic functions
where if you take the integral from 0 to 2pi you get the area
My question is, is this already a thing, and how do I find the thing? (I have no education)
Integrating cos or -cos from 0 to 2pi just gives 0
The +1 bit just yields x which gives 2pi at the end of integration
So all in all it’s just pi r^2
you still have to multiply by r^2/2 in the formula (-cos(x) + 1) * (r^2 /2)
I want to do this for more complex shapes than a circle in the end
That’s what I mean. You’ve just rewritten it but the cos part is insignificant
What you’re doing is equivalent to integrating r^2/2 from 0 to 2pi
That gives 2pi * r^2/2, which is just pi r^2
Maybe if you slice a 2d surface in half along the x axis, you can get a piece wise function for the shape in 1d. Then you could assume it to be periodic, and use fourier.
Then once you have a non piecewise function in terms of sins and stuff, you could use that formula.
Thats the maybe dumb idea
That is a neat insite into why its working in the first place though!
But the point is that cos(x) is insignificant. You could’ve chosen sin(x), it’s just adding 0
True, I guess, I just wanted to start with a circle as its simple, but I want to do more complex shapes.
And as it is, r^2/2 is a periodic function that integrates to the area of a circle when integrated from 0 to 2pi
Oh thats neat, I didnt know that!
What about the idea of slicing a more complex shape along the x and making a piece wise function where the top half is the first part, and the bottom half is the second part. Then assuming that to oscillate on an infinite domain so you can use a fourier transform to get a non piecewise function back in terms of the sine's?
@surreal magnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @surreal magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm looking to prove that (provided the necessary conditions are satisfied), if $(a_n) \to a$, then $f(a_n) \to f(a)$
Also this would be the first time I'm working with the definition of a limit using epsilon-delta
jewels!
Isn't that obvious
Probably is, I just don't know how to word the proof
It is probably exactly epsilon-delta
So in other words u have to proove
Lim an --> a f(an) = a
Use the Delta Epsilon definition to do it
I know 😭
So I suppose I start off as normal
Let $\epsilon > 0$, and choose $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n \ge N$, we have:
[|a_n - a| < \epsilon]
jewels!
But I need to show that this implies that |f(x) - f(a)| < delta
If I'm not wrong
which is where I'm stuck
This requires continuity of f, so you'll need to use that :p
Yeah exactly was thinking that
f is continuous at a and defined for all a_n yeah
The above statement is wrong since if the function isn't continous at a then the limit won't exist so functuon won't tend to f(a)
I did say the necessary conditions are satisfied
I didn't want to list them out
then what's the damn proof
If function is continous it means
Limit is defined and value of limiti equalw the value of function at that point
Limit *
Equals*
But is there not a need to show that the sequence defined by f(a_n) converges to f(a)?
When inputs of f get really close, outputs get close too. That's continuity.
You've written down that the points of the sequence are arbitrarily close to a, so you should be able to conclude that the outputs are close as well.
I'm sorry I'm kind of slow I need some time to think about this
But I think you started from the wrong place. You will use the fact that an converges to a, but I recommend you start with the definition of continuity of f first.
Use that to find some delta such that whenever |x-y| < delta, |f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon.
Then you can use the convergence of a_n to find a suitable N that fits this delta.
So I can just say that
Since $f$ is continuous, for some $x, y \in D$, and $\epsilon, \delta > 0$:
[|x - y| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(y)| < \epsilon]
Let $\epsilon' > 0$ and choose $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n \geq N$:
[|a_n - a| < \epsilon']
From the fact that $f$ is continuous, there exists $\delta' > 0$ such that:
[|f(a_n) - f(a)| < \delta']
Thus, $(a_n) \to a \implies f(a_n) \to f(a)$.
jewels!
D is the domain of the function i'll write it out better
If f is continuous on D, the first line hold for every x,y in D.
You also don't need to invoke epsilon', just find some N such that |a_n - a| < delta.
Then, whenever n >= N, we have |a_n - a| < delta, and as such |f(a_n) - f(a)| < epsilon.
You're still proving that f(a_n) converges to f(a). It's just that you're finding your N through continuity.
Yeah that's fine, you only need it to be continuous at a.
Since $f$ is continuous, for some $x, y \in D$, and $\epsilon, \delta > 0$:
[|x - y| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(y)| < \epsilon]
Now choose $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that:
[|a_n - a| < \delta]
From the fact that $f$ is continuous:
[|f(a_n) - f(a)| < \epsilon]
Thus, $(a_n) \to a \implies f(a_n) \to f(a)$.
jewels!
But doesn't that make my first statement wrong
I'd need to somehow rephrase it
Yeah I think I should've written the definition as :
$f$ is continuous at $x=a$ $\iff$ given $\epsilon > 0$ there is some $\delta > 0$ such that
$$|x-a| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon$$
Sorry about that
Azyrashacorki
That should be better
No worries! Happy to have helped a bit
.close
Closed by @west vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure how ii) is related to the first part
And what did you try for the (ii) ?
Nothing
Idk how I’m supposed to use the last answer
Let Z = z^2
Alright lemme see
Oh I see now u end up with z^2 = (first part)
thanks
.close
Closed by @cloud yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
asking...
I'm trying to isolate x: 3x - 8 = 0. I tried to move x to the right side by diving by x, but I get bad answer:
3-8 = 0/x
I know that I can first move the 8 by adding 8 to both sides, and then divide by 3.
but what's the correct way to just move the x?
3x=8 (add 8 to both sides)
So this yes that is the correct way
Afterwards you could divide on both sides to isolate x
But, my question is, why do I get a nonsense answer if I divide both sides by x?
Because you did not divide both sides by x
You forgot to divide the 8 🙂
oh
You would need to do: $\frac{3x-8}{x} = 0/x$
thijs2725
Where 0/x would just be 0 BUT
There is a big problem with this
When you divide by x you assume x does not equal 0
Because you cant divide by 0
If x=0 would have been an answer you would no longer get this result and thus it is generally not used to divide by a variable unless we know it does not equal 0 or something
Do you understand this last part because this is a important part? 🙂
yes
But, if I did go that route anyway, would that simply to:
$\frac{3-8}{x} = 0/x$
Vulkanoid
You can edit your msg the math text will update
Vulkanoid
It would still be a minus sign between the 3 and the 8/x not a multiplier
And 0/x would just simplify to 0 because 0/anything is 0 (assuming x does absolutely not equal to 0)
$\frac{-5}{x} = 0/x$
Vulkanoid
my point is, what want to follow through on simplifying the equation, if I decide to initially move the x to the right.
$3 - 8/x = 0 $ is the correct way
Yeah that wont work because there is a 0
ah, so it's like the x never even moved.
Yes
And again it is best to avoid dividing by 0 so it wont become a bad habit
Could become a real problem in equations such as $x^2-x = 0$
thijs2725
I'm more trying to understand the rules, rather than finding a specific answer. When I first tried to move the x, I got that 0 answer, and I wanted to understand where I was going wrong.
I think I get it now.
Thank you
Good luck
.close
Closed by @fervent galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does this work?
which line is the first one you don't understand?
How does (k(k+1))/2 + (k+1) go to the next line?
notice that both terms in that line contain k+1 as a common factor
Hmm
$\frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1) = \frac{k}{2}(k+1) + 1(k+1)$
Nel
$\frac{k}{2}(k+1) + 1(k+1)$
🐚🐳 𝕄σ𝑜S𝓗ⓡ𝐎O𝕞 ๓ỖόN ☯💋
I don’t understand
What's 3/2 cm + 1 cm?
What's 2a kg + 5b kg?
2a kg + 5b kg = 2a kg + 5b kg
Can't you rewrite it using "kg" one single time?
2a + 5b kg
k/2 + 1 day
Same with that, except it's (k+1) instead of days
ah I see so
Now I see why this is right
@lilac fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lilac fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I calculate this limit
I have been applying taylor series and stuff but I get nowhere
I suggest putting everything on the same denominator
$\frac{(x-1)^2-x(\log x)^2}{x(\log x)^2(x-1)^2}$
rafilou2003
Honestly i am not sure what is exactly the denominator notation of the first fraction
rafilou2003
you're gonna need 4th order taylor approximation of the numerator
Ah yes so basically I have to apply the log(x+1) taylor series and manipulate that right?
and why is the denominator (x-1)^4
x ~ 1, log(x) ~ x-1
Closed by @warm burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did I need to divide the log9 alone?
no
what formula is this?
that doesn't really help you
I already corrected Q74 thanks
Emmm
that's ok now
@stuck mural Has your question been resolved?
Did I need to turn to3^2?
that will help
consider simplifying log(9)
no
are you ignoring
consider simplifying log(9)
if you were asked to do just that, (forget about the 150)
what would you do?
450?
I don't know
Change into 3^2
But if 2log3/log3 it will be 2
Then it cannot be log 150
2log3
yes
from that you'll have
2log(3) = b
and can get an expression for log(3) in terms of b
yes
Closed by @stuck mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the relationship between:
(a/b + c/d + e/f) * (1/3)
and
(a+c+e)/(b+d+f)
as in: which is larger? when does equality hold
Well, are there any values associated with each variable, or is this for universal situations?
positive real
Ok
@brave helm Has your question been resolved?
@brave helm Has your question been resolved?
Gotta have the same denominators to compare
So the question is how to get the same denominator
@brave helm Has your question been resolved?
@brave helm Has your question been resolved?
(1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4)/3 > 1/3 = (1+1+1)/(2+3+4)
but (1000000/2000000+ 1/3 + 1/4)/3 = 1/4+1/9 < 3/8 < 1000001/2000007
i do not think either side is, as a rule, larger than the other
Closed by @brave helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this negation correct?
To keep it more concise I guess I should replace "at least one sequence" with just "a sequence"
.close
Closed by @west vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
z
is that the original question
seems to be a mistake in the question
sum of complex conjugates will be real
Closed by @minor ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
@frozen wharf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Looking for help with question 7.c please
a mass greater than 104g has a z score greater than what?
whats the probability of having z score greater than 2?
oh weird
go with the numbers in your book
alright cool, thanks for the help 👍
youre welcome
.close
Closed by @spark mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Greetings seniors, may I ask how they got A+2B=0 and 2A-B=1. Where did Ax and 2Bx go??
What's the coefficient of x on the RHS?
I'm referring to this equality
Ok, but what's the "value"?
on the rhs
Should I send the whole question?? Because I don't really get it myself, I'm sorry
sure
No, this is sufficient for answering your question
My teacher graded my friend's answer as 10 as in 100% correct
But I simply could not understand where the hell did the ax and bx go on the answer at the bottom
I was explaining that 😅
RHS means right-hand side
Here
I don't know
That's the whole question
You just have to look at what's written there
It wasn't mentioned
Here in the green box
I don't understand
Do you know what a coefficient is?
The number
In the polynomial 3x - 1 what's the coefficient of x?
3
6 and 7?
The coefficient is just one number
Oh 1
You have to simplify the polynomial, first of all
Exactly
Now, can you tell me what's the coefficient of x in the right hand side of the equation in green?
Umm wait
I'm sorry I may have brain damage but Im guessing 2?? Because there's 2x??
Ok, let's start from scratch
Because I think they got that part, as far as I understood from their question
ye but he needs to understand
I believe he already knows that
o
I kinda understand the other processes but I just don't get where ax and bx go
What's the coefficient of x in the polynomial 4x² + 7 ?
2
What
Wait
Uhh should I square root it? Since it's asking me to give the cooficient of x
So 4?
If you don't have any x, what's the only option for the coefficient?
Eh I'm a dumb dumb
Is 4 multiplied by x?
7
Is 7 multiplied by x?
😭
If you can answer these two simple questions you'll see why they're not the correct coefficient 😅
If I don't have any x, how are there any options for the coefficient?
From. 4x²-7
So none?
Yes?
Sir I'm sorry
Yeah Im giving up on a levels
bruh
Is it really that obvious???
can u vc??
Sure
im with a friend rn so do u mind a gc?
Ok ok
just wanna use whiteboard
If you don't have any x, it means you have how many??
There you go!!
Sir Albert I apologize for my stupidity that has caused you immense pain and stress🥲
Don't worry 🤗 we're here to help you all
I just wanted not to give you the answer directly, but instead taking it out from your reasoning, which is more productive
Closed by @solemn pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was thinking they could be either odd or even for both
even means that f(-x)=f(x) and g(-x)=g(x) right?
so check whether this holds when you plug in -x for f+g
yes, for this example but we need to know whether this is for all functions
however, f(x)=x^2, g(x)=-x^2 gives 0, a function that's both odd or even
so odd(say)
so f+g can either be odd or even
there is an easier and more general way of doing this
i will work f+g and let fg for you
so if we plug in -x for f+g, we get (f+g)(-x)=f(-x)+g(-x) which is equal to f(x)+g(x) which is just (f+g)(x), so (f+g)(-x)=(f+g)(x) which is even
@sharp smelt that is what i was going to say
try doing the same with fg
Cool, thanks
I suspect that's not true for odd functions though
consider f(x)g(x) when f(x)=x^3, g(x)=x^5
And if f is even, and g odd, then product is odd
also true
That is useful for integration sometimes
I know, I've done integration, just revising functions for my uni's calculus course
We'll be focusing on proofs now, so probably for the better
Hmm.Yes
f(-x)=-f(x)
g(-x)=-g(x)
so f(-x)g(-x)=f(x)g(x)
very good
Now to deal with the sum
just because its also odd doesnt mean its not even. that would be the case for numbers but not here
Got it. Thank you.
the claim doesnt say anything about f+g or fg being odd. it only cares about them being even
That's actually the next part of the question. By conicidence, @twin hedge suggested it as an exercise.
I haven't posted that as I needed help with this question first.
Was hoping to apply my learnings from this to that
I suspect f(x)+g(x) will be odd, if f(x) and g(x) are odd
yes, very good

Thanks
I think the answer is true here
That is ,Yes, h is always an even function
yes
yeah, if f is odd then h is odd, if f is even then h is even
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hallo I didnt pay attention at school and I dont know how to solve this
how many degrees in a right angle?
90¿
90 ti what
to
my question or his question
his
correct
now if a right angle is 90 degrees
how many degrees is a straight line
I thought a null angle was 0°, like a straight line
null angle != straight line
Ummmmm
ok so
for starters
a straight line is double a right angle
so a straight line has 180 degrees
you have to learn this like english
now
the thingy in red is a straight line
how much angle is x
20°?
no
180-126
goo
d
vety goo
what is that equal to
54°
ok
Do uk vertically opposite angles?
yeah you are right.........
it doesn't take a long time
just watch a quick vid
tbh we can't really help you if you don't know the basics
like we are not asking to be a math olympic
but the basics...
I think I just don't know english very well either
why
you can get a book in your native language
a lot of resources on the internet are in english though
Its quite simple. If you consider the size of an angle in a whole circle, its 360 degrees. Then when you cut a circle in half, the angle at the centre splits to 180 degrees. So therefore angles on a straight line would add to 180 degrees. So the angle x is 180-126 (half a circle) which is 54 degrees.
yeah
yea, u have to know those little properties to solve those problems
vertical angles, sum of angles in a triangle, etc
This image was really helpful
Thank you
best to learn all the circle theorems, search up 'circle theorems and basic angles explained in 1 video'
maximum 30 mins and ur a pro
Ill be at the nasa next
Thank you
!!!
nws
.close
Closed by @dreamy crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
They don't know you lil bro
.close
Closed by @brisk steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
lil bro
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why can a = 0
on the first step, we multiplied by 1/sqrt(a)
thus, we lost the solution a=0, since 1/sqrt(0) is 1/0 which is an indeterminate form (we would be dividing by 0!!)
so the only solution that we'll get after that is 1/4. that doesn't mean that a=0 doesn't satisfy the first equation: we can clearly see that it does without doing any work, so we add the solution a=0 at the end
ok thanks
.close
Closed by @sturdy hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was thinking of using the general form of the equation of a circle to obtain this, upon comparison
that is $x^2+y^2+2gx+2fy+c=0$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
hint: ||when a=0, can you see why it's not a circle?||
well how would you wanna do it with that form
check my hint
I have one more idea, I;ll check it after that ?
oki
My other idea is to use the defn of a circle
that is
the locus of points , equidistant from a fixed point.
so the point in this case, would be $\frac{x_1+x_2+x_3}{3} , \frac{y_1+y_2+y_3}{3}$
Now to prove sucha point doesn't exist if all 3 points are co-linear
so (0,1), (1,0) and (-1,0) would be on a circle of center?
(0,0)
and your formula gives you what?
(0,1/3)
well your formula also adds +3 for the y coords for some reason
sounds like that's not much of a valid formula
but ignoring that, yes
y_3 instead of y+3
f(why am i here )= I don't know
I supposed I could solve a system of equations to find this point
Yes
which system of equations
from what book is this question
Linear algebra and its applications by Keith nicholson
well and what chapter is it in?
great, do you see the connection between what i said and your problem?
if three points are not collinear, can they all satisfy a linear equation
Systems of linear equations
Not a single one, no.
so then an approach using a system of equations is a good idea
I was thinking of the following system
Let the centre be $(a,b)$
$$\sqrt{(a-x_1)^2 + (b-y_1)^2} = \sqrt{a-x_2)^2 + (b-y_2)^2}$$
\
and
\
$$\sqrt{(a-x_2)^2 + (b-y_2)^2} = \sqrt{a-x_3)^2 + (b-y_3)^2}$$
\
and
\
$$\sqrt{(a-x_1)^2 + (b-y_1)^2} = \sqrt{a-x_3)^2 + (b-y_3)^2}$$
\
f(why am i here )= I don't know
Now we can square both sides of all equations
you are so much overthinking
traumatised from jee etc
use the form for the circle you are given
imagine the exercise used the word oazgn instead of circle
I suggest you keep it with this formula for circle given
and you can "pick a = 1" when a !=0
Okay. Thanks
if three points lie on a circle of this equation, maybe the best thing to do is find the values of b,c,d in that case
Let me think. Thanks
alr
book exercises are usually not trying to trick you. often they really only require the knowledge that the book just taught you
what are the variables you are searching for
f(why am i here )= I don't know
Now, I just solve them
so $$(x_1^2+y_1^2)+bx_1+cy_1+d=0$$
\
$$(x_2^2+y_2^2)+bx_2+cy_2+d=0$$
\
$$(x_3^2+y_3^2)+bx_3+cy_3+d=0$$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
now $(x_i^2+x_j^2)$ is a constant
f(why am i here )= I don't know
d is not a constant
Hmm
No two planes are parallel.
But there's no gurantee that they'll all intersect at one point either
well presumably your book went through some theory to check whether a system is solvable
(solving it of course shows its solvable but is a bit more messy)
I could check that, but idts
I doubt that
Ah
one thing
we did say that if the number of variables is more than the rank, solutions exist
not quite
No of variables is more than the number of equations
no
I'm not too sure, sorry
this is for homogenous systems. we actually had that at the start, but decided to set a=1. we could apply that result but then we would have to argue that a!=0.
thankfully you got a hint earlier on how to do that
OOh
right
if a=0
there AREN'T more equations than variables
so only trivial solns exist
Thanks!
we take a=1,no?
no
we can divid the eqn by a , assuming a!=0
we dont know that yet
And when a=0, it's automatically a line
we want to show that a,b,c,d exist in the first place
So we have 4 equations, 3 vars
no
Uh
