#help-39
1 messages · Page 119 of 1
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
If you look at the last step, the degree of above is one less than the below one
That's what I imagined. In this too
Example: (x³+3)/(x²+1) = x + (3-x)/(x²+1)
Here u go
U can take out x and have the degree one less now
@daring wedge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
oop
yep ur good @daring wedge
.close
I needed this
no like
😭
leave it its fine
Closed by @daring wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
k bye
Thanks
im acc gon jump out a window lmfao
✅
nm
Bwahahahahahha
yep
Closed by @daring wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Q5 is correct
Question 6 also seems correct to me
56 can’t be a multiple of 3 so a and b must be wrong
Alright thank you guys
@willow marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @willow marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm lost
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
do you get the f^(-1) and domain ?
@wintry bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Okay
What are the possible values of x here?
all real numbers, and the y is always positive
I suggest you read the que. Again with bit of a care
Yea
sorry
Yeah
well
i know the positive of x in absolute value
is this area
on the right
and the plus one would move it to the right i think
i'm confused
I mean
this is the domain right
Yea
okay
Yep that is the range
so now i have to find the inverse
I mean you know how to do this right
yeah switch f(x) and x
Yea
f(x)= |x| +1
Can we drop the mod ?
No
whats mod
Yeah
okay so
Okay
because there's no negative x
Righttt
x=f(x)+1
How did you got this
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
.reopen
✅
okay go on
I mean
You have to let x be on one side of equation and everything else on the other side
Can't just switch f(x) and x
Can you explain what did you do here?
Wiz are you following?
@wintry bobcat Has your question been resolved?
An equation for f^-1 would mean a piecewise function
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
basically, you change f(x) to y
y = x + 1
now rearrange for x
x = y - 1
now rewrite x as f^-1(x) to say the result of the equation is the inverse function
and change y to x
f^-1(x) = x - 1
mb bot its not my help channel
Close the channel :3
Noep
Dot close
.close
Closed by @timid isle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sorry i was doing some more
well after switching x and y
i tried solving for y
yeah
f^-1(x) ≥ 0
f^-1(x) = x - 1
so d oma in is x ≥ 1
the domain of f(x) is the range of f^-1(x)
the range of f(x) is the domain of f^-1(x)
yea u gotta remember it but it's easy to remember
alright ill keep that in mind from now on
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I have a question about parametrising a sphere into cilindrical coordinats the general question is not that important I just want to know if I'm doing it correctly:
Let a Sphere be defined by the equation: $$x^2 + y^2 +z^2 = 2z$$
Mephisto
so... I let $$x^2 + y^2 = u^2$ because x = ucos(t) and y = usin(t) which results in $u^2 + z^2 =2z$$\
Mephisto
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
but I'm not sure what to do next? do I solve for z or...
Yes
ah alright, so this will give me the parametrisation?
or for the z component atleast
Yes
okay, and let's say I'd want to take a volume integral of the volume between a code and this sphere... how do I do that?
I mean how do I choose my boundries?
the question specifices me to use a triple integral, but I have only two variables to work with
$$\integral{}{}\integral{V}{}\integral{}{} dudt$$
Mephisto
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
that does not form a sphere
It should, It's a sphere with z=2 as center point
ah crap you're right lol sorry
I'm still clueless on the integral part, so if you have any ideas I'm all ears
I'll try to plot the problem hold on
I have to calculate the area between the cone and the sphere using cilindrical coordinates and a triple integral
the cone is a basic x^2 + y^2 =z^2
cylindrical coordinates contain three different parameters
there are two angle parameters and one radius parameter
and the absolute value of the determinant of the jacobian is r^2 * sin(the north pole angle)
ah okay
so lets say I have
$$\begin{cases}
{x = ucos(\theta)}\{y=usin(\theta)}\{z=\text{(still have to solve for it)}}
\end{cases}$$
Mephisto
there isn't anything for the north angle
same goes for the cone
$\iiint_V r^2sin(\phi)d\theta d\phi du$
Mephisto
is it simply this? with 0 and 2pi as bounds for phi?
or do I have to calculate the bounds based on the intesection points?
in this case it looks like pi/4
@chilly slate Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @chilly slate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
was trying to figure out if this was the right direction to go in
i know that if it was just sqrt(4n^3), then i can leave it as 2n(sqrt(n))
but this is sqrt(4n^3-1), so it must not work, so im not sure what exactly is supposed to happen, if what ive been doing isnt working
i did try this (on the left), but i dont think thats the right direction either (evident by the fact i kinda just paused and didnt bother to finish where i was at)
the left is good
you’re comparing the series to the series of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{4n^3}}$
y0shi
which we know converges by p-series
yeah, i know that it converges
mhm so then just carry out the limit
if it equals a positive finite number
then both series must converge or both diverge
by the limit comparison test ofc
oookaay... uh, lemme see how far i get it then
... this is gonna be a whole bunch of L'Hopital rules...
well not if you know the general rule for rational functions
generally for the limit as n approaches infinity of some rational function
if the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator, it’ll approach infinity
if it’s less, then it’ll approach 0
...hm, okay, so with, that in mind
if they’re equal, then it’ll approach the ratio of the highest order coefficients
take the 1/2 out!!!!
mhm so this limit would equal?
O_o
it matches with the other series we’re comparing it to
less confusing to keep it inside
okay so if the limit is just sqrt(4n^3)/sqrt(4n^3-1)
whatever value n would be, the denominator is still less then the numerator
it shouldnt
yep so we can ignore it
its barely a difference, its just 1
as n gets really big
so really it’s just the same as $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sqrt{4n^3}}{\sqrt{4n^3}}$
engineers be like
y0shi
and see how they cancel out
so it'd be equal to 1, they cancel out
yep that’s it
and since 1 isnt 0 it converges by LCT
yep

i sure the heckerdoodle hope so
hopefully the ratio test stuff i gotta do wont go nearly as bad as this did
thank you
.close
Closed by @fierce kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am having trouble evaluating a limit. lim as r→9 of √r over (r − 9)^4. I have asked chat gpt and it just subsitutes random values to make it make sense and watched a video where they simply subsituted 1 into the top but that didnt make any sense to me. can someone help me please?
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
you're trying to find $\lim_{r \to 9} \frac{\sqrt{r}}{(r-9)^{4}}$?
🫎 Moosey 🫎
yes
I mean it's not that convenient, but multiple applications of L'Hospital could help
You should be able to note something immediately if you plug in 9, but if you want to be more rigorous, you'll need to find $\lim_{r \to 9^+} \frac{\sqrt{r}}{(r-9)^{4}}$ and $\lim_{r \to 9^-} \frac{\sqrt{r}}{(r-9)^{4}}$
🫎 Moosey 🫎
this is not of the form of lhopitals rule.
Oh, sure, that's right, sorry 💀
My bad
does the limit not exist then?
3:30 am here, i think I'm gonna hit the sack
if infinity or -infinity are not valid answers, then yes, the limit does not exist
haha gn thanks for the advice
but if they are?
then you would look at both of the cases listed up here
ah ok I was being stupid. thanks for the help
you understand what lim r->9^+ and r->9^- means yes?
no
you are right in that limit as r approaches 9 from the right (9^+) is positive infinity
and you are right in thinking 9^- -9is a negative number
but because it is ^4 it is positive?
so you could say the limit is positive infinity, if allowed, but if not, then DNE is fine
yeah you can just do .close
.close
Closed by @unborn token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
@cinder ledge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Closed by @tulip shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you find critical values with a significance level 0.01
Does this mean that alpha is .01?
So if alpha is 0.01 and my alternate is >
Then i just look at 0.01 without dividing
yep
I have already submitted it
I know the pooled variance
is this two samples?
Its a paired t test
Wait no i dont think thats pooled variance actually
I have SD for the bottom of the equation to solve for the test statistic
To be safe ill use t table
Is it just 0.01 and sample size -1
yeah
Thank you
@vague fiber Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vague fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me how to do this question?
x^x=3^(x+9)
you here?
yeah
are you in the mood to guess?
theres no way you can directly solve for x in x^x = 3^(x+9)
the best you can do is to prove that there is only up to 1 solution (which is bigger than 1)
ohh i see thank you
if you want to guess, you should aim for a power of 3
I do until x(ln(x/3))=9ln3 and then get stuck
with x ln(x/3) = 9 ln 3,
can you guess x as a particular power of 3 which would satisfy the equation
yeah , thank you
@cunning vault Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cunning vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What did I do wrong
check your anti derivatives
??
Huh
Oh
Wait
Yeah I just took the derivative 💀
dw it happens a lot lol
at least to me
usually i just differentiate my anti derivative to check
Closed by @rose sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand square roots, what's the square root of 144
What times what is 144
Well there’s lots of resources online to help you
Do you understand the concept of squaring a number?
if nothing else you can brute force it
nvm ill just use a calculator
ie $2^2$ =?
Nathan
Don’t cheat your way out of arithmetic it’s good to know these basic calculations
Closed by @daring valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
You take a point at the right and left of the point at which you wish to have your tangent
draw a secant to both those points
That's the relevant concept
I am asking more formally, if you know about the limit definition
Do you need to know?
yes
I'll copy from wikipedia
[L = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h}]
The doubt was not this, I knew the answer to this
fishwhale
This is just the derivative
If this exists at a the function exists at a
Yes the slope is the derivative
ah
Tangents at points are derivatives at points
For it to be well-defined yes
ok and if it has two, then we say that, that tangent at that perticular point it not well defined?
At A it depends a little on what you mean by tangents
Yes, 2 or more = not a single one = not well defined, I think this is good equating for now
I want to expand on this because the left-side tangent is likely infinity, that's actually still considered existing and well-defined enough, since infinity is a solidly defined concept
Additionally the right side is just some downward slope so some finite negative number.
We know (\infty \neq \text{some finite negative number})
How do you know for sure that this point A has two tangents
You could say that there is a gap in the function
but the gap is a point
fishwhale
What is the formal definition of continuity?
I haven't got there yet, I was just on tangents
ah I see
I was following the method where you draw a secant to two poinits from left and right and make them appoach the center point
so the line that those two secants approaches is the tangent is what I tought
Ok I need to back track a bit
It is correct to say that a function is not differentiable at a point if the left and right derivatives do not agree.
Here it is not as meaningful because a function not defined at a point means it cannot be differentiable at that point
Oh wait
Ahhhhhh I'm being slow
Ok
- function not defined at a point -> function differentiability at that point undefinable
- function whose limits do not agree with that point -> function not differentiable (you may be asked to prove this)
So this is case 2 of that
oh ok
And the formal way of saying it is, a function that is not continuous at a point cannot be differentiable at that point
Basically continuity is agreement of limits at points with functions values at those points
ahh, so if the limit is same from both the sides, we say that the function is continues at that point
?
wait say there was a physical gap between the functiono
Like this
yes
This is continuous (at every point, including A)
Just not differentiable (at A, and the sudden angle switching points)
But if you approach the limit from left at A and from right, you will get differrent values
because I am saying that there is a physical gap between those two curves
No, with positive angle theta
I agree with you if theta is exactly 0
wait, those two lines that you see coming down are tangents that I drew
Yes so if your theta is strictly positive
They are not part of the function
Then the limit at A is exactly A
Ok sorry that's not coming through in the drawing
But do you get what I mean?
Yes my bad
yeah I got that
Niceee, I think that should give more intuitive sense as to what is going on too
And continuity/diff in 1D should be intuitive
Yes but that was not by doubt lol
lets call those two tangents t1 and t2 (again the function is just the curve, those lines coming down are tangents)
yes
in that case, the tangent would be not defined as you would have two tangents obviously as you can see
Yes let's call them left and right tangents (fact that we are working in 1D lets us do this, we are literally exhausting all cases)
but as theta goes to 0 or in other words, the gap between those two curve decreases, the tangents two would come closer?
And yes they need to agree exactly
Aaaaaaaaa
I see your doubt
Is this picture
Ok no, that's not how we would define a tangent in that case
yeah
I don't know what to say about that intuition other than it goes against the definitions
The 'tangent' not definable at A in the case of theta=0, would be a flat tangent
So the teacher I was seeing this from just said, the tangent is undefined and moved on, but ideally we would have to rigorously prove that the tangent is not defined because this way, it seems that it is
right?
Well actually that's probably not true, I don't know. I think it's safer to say the tangent is not definable at A if you get theta=0
Yeahhhh I'm giving up like your teacher
Because the limit in the case of theta=0 is exactly the meeting point, and NOT equal to A. So we know the function is not continuous, and non-continuity -> non-diff
I think
For your 'wrong intuition'
There's always value in wrong intuition btw
It's just a matter of like, making it work
oh yeaah, that is how you realize the need of rigour
I think you just need to try weaker definitions and see if any of the tangents stick around
But for that you need a lot higher math :)
So yeah, for now stick to simpler math and say the tangent is not defined
@vapid bough Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vapid bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ABCD is a parallelogram
AE, BE, CG, and DG bisect the internal angles
Prove that EFGH Is a rectangle
Anyone have an idea how to solve this?
I think I need to figure out that BFC = 90 Degrees And AHD = 90 Degrees
@halcyon whale Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@halcyon whale Has your question been resolved?
thats correct
now as a hint, consider that what BAD + ADC is, knowing ABCD is a parallelogram
do you see angle BAD?
yes
its an obtuse angle, right?
yeah
that means its bigger than 90 degrees, right?
yeah
so whats BAD + ADC?
180?
do you know why BAD + ADC is 180?
because its an parallelogram
oh
no
oh i know
because a + d = 180
i don't know how its called
this theorem
dont bother with the name
alright
it sounds like you just memorized that its true
thats not good
but itll work for now
since you know BAD + ADC is 180,
yeah
thats the reason
AE is the same thing as AH
so AH splits BAD in half
BAH and HAD are those halves
how do you know that AE is the same thing as AH
what do you think
AE is the same line as AH
you know we're talking about angles
we're not talking about sides
so AH is the same line as AE
ohh
AH is not the same segment as AE
alright
Because of his slope?
no
I don't really get what you mean
youre saying that when I type ADH, it means "They are equal"?
The same angel
You mean the angel right?
what does the three-letter ADH mean by itself?
yes
you implied you knew what this meant
use what you know to see that this is true
do you know what this sentence means
AE, BE, CG, and DG bisect the internal angles?
please stop making up names
without labelling a corresponding picture with those names
be professional
you didnt even say D1 = D2
we're talking about angle D
cmon
also no
those are vertical angles
they are equal for a different reason
So its means that AHD = CDH
you misspelled ADH
so since ADH = CDH
and ADH and CDH are both part of ADC
right
what does that mean about ADH?
so ADH = ADC:2
yes
nice
and similarly what about HAD and BAD?
you mean BAH?
no
also correct
now lets consider HAD + ADH
at first it looks like we dont know this sum
but using the facts we just mentioned, we can calculate it
yes
youre very close to proving that AHD is 90 degrees
what is the final step to get from HAD + ADH = 90 to AHD = 90?
yep
yea
np
.close
Closed by @halcyon whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this correct?
Closed by @pulsar stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
...
given A is invertible and is of structure n x n (square matrix), how do i prove there exists a k natural number such that:
$A^k = I_\mathbb{F}$
Ayanokoji
also given $\mathbb{F}$ is a closed Field
Ayanokoji
idk how that helps
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
@pulsar stump Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @pulsar stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
my teacher specifically wants this in point-slope form, but I don't know how much to include:
y-1=1(x-0)
I want to simplify it but I don't know if its more correct to leave everything in there
this is usually enough
I don't know if it should be that or y-1=x
you should do y - 1 = 1(x - 0)
Closed by @willow chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I had a doubt
What does series expansion actually mean
For example if I take sin(x) series so what does that series mean?
You can take it as a definition of the sine function
we can write that [ \sin x = x - \frac{1}{3!} x^3 + \frac{1}{5!} x^5 + \cdots ] which means that in the limit as the number of terms in the series that we add approaches infinity, the polynomial we get approaches the sine function
cloud
don't look for some deep hideen meaning
there are similar series for lots of other functions
e^x = 1 + x + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + ...
But my question is
Will it ever reach sine function?
If not then what's the point
When you take the limit it is equal
not in a finite number of terms, but it can get arbitrarily close to the sine function, which is why it's equal in the limit
Can u show?
We say it converges to the function
basically it means that if you add enough terms, you can get arbitrary precision
What I meant is the definition of a new function named “sin” can be defined by that infinite sum (or series)
So are series even useful then?
Very
similarly we can say that the function $f(x) = \frac 1x \ne 0$ for any given value of x, but regardless we say that [ \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac 1x = 0 ]
cloud
ofc, in the limit to infinitely many terms, it's actually equal to sin(x)
you can get a very good approximation for sin(x) by adding the first few terms
Ooo real real
Have you ever heard of sinx = x for sufficiently small x
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
Yep
A lot
In physics it was used in so so so many derivationa
Derivations
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yeah I am getting d too
Closed by @brittle onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when does the object start moving?
and does it move at varying speed or constant speed throughout?
.
u sure
yea i did and Nemesis gave me an answer but i asked it in the physics discord a while ago and they said it was C but didnt give me any reasoning
but my doubt is "instantanous" velocity
Which means its moving south no?
How so
its asking for that specific instant
Yeah
wait nvm
The velocity is the same from between 2 to 8 seconds
@brittle onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brittle onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure how to approach this
I’d think about factorising 2010
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can you tell me what angles/sides you used to get that it is ASA?
2 angles and the included side of one triangle must be congruent to two anfles and the incleded side of the other triangle
Are you sure that is ASA?
Is the congruent side between the two angles?
Question 1 btw sorry that I didn't specify
2 angles and the side in
between are congruent is asa
wait is it aas then?
@covert pivot ?
yeah
Because the side isn't between the angles
ASA the side is between the angle
AAS the side touches one of the angles but not both
I think maybe the first?
how do we get another person to look at it to see what they think
any idea on the third one?
third is the first choice
you have two sides congruent
then the third side is reflexive
so it is also equal
I feel like its the first one also
Because we have the reflexive side
then because its a perpendicular bisector we know that ACB = BCD
and AC = CD
i am just going to do the first one
@short blade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @short blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do 27
<@&286206848099549185>
Working on it...
Thanks
I calculated the surface area I think but I don’t know what to do from there
Multiply by 0.5mL 👀
Is this your integral?
No you forgot to add 1 on the inside of the square root
It simplifies it
Okay well we’re both wrong
The correct answer is 226.2 L
Convert to L
Tried that
Times 5000 woks?
Ah, there ya go
Still wrong
Multiply the pi
Not a terrible idea
Still wrong
Wait
I got
2261.9
That’s too much of a coincidence
Uh
I don’t see what I’m doing wrong
Wait let’s walk through the calculation
Lemme demos it
The surface area of the wok is 288
Wait
It’s 0.5 mm
Not cm
We had to transfer unit
I got it 😎
Wait
Okay so the enamel is 0.05 cm
Oh...shoot
The conversion was wrong?
1mL = 1cm^3
But still
But we were doing 0.5mm
Isn’t there two enamels
And calling that a mL
Or is the sum of them 0.05
Okay
It says EACH enamel is 0.5 mm thick
And there’s two enamels
So the total thickness is 1
mm
So the volume of enamel is 288 *0.1
28.8
Times pi
90.5
Times 5000
Okay so it’s exactly double
The correct answer
Yeah so maybe it’s worded really poorly
It suggests there is double the thickness but in order to get the right answer I must use 0.5mm not 1mm
$2880.12*\pi5000\frac{1}{1000} = 2 * 226.2$
Nathan
How did you get .1x2
Yeah that's one side's enamel
0.1 is the combined thickness
So you are doubling TWICE?
No no lol it was a typo
So why do you need the 2?
Well it should be same as mine then?