#help-39
1 messages · Page 104 of 1
Not quite, the y-axis is the entire axis we draw
so how do we find that
We were given y=-2x+9, what does the 9 mean? What happens when x=0?
Yes, so how can we find "b" if we know the y-intercept?
1/2x +9=y
i dont understand is 9 not b
Is that right? What is the correct y-intercept we want?
What should our final "b" be equal to?
to y?
Reread the question
Indeed
oh yay
So what's our final equation?
1/2x + 4 =y
That's correct!
Remember the steps you went through here, and you can solve any problem that are similar to this
can we do this if we have the line
Which line? Do you have an example?
Okay, first of all, what does the question want us to find?
the equation of the line
What form should it be in?
y=-3 and x=-1
itdoesnt say
y=mx+b?
Sure, we can do that
What does the question tell us in terms of information to help us solve it?
the y intercept and the x intercept
Can we already find m or b just from that info?
i mean if b is the y intercept wouldnt it be -3?
Absolutely, that's right
and can we also figure out m?
We can
how
Well, what does the "gradient" actually mean?
Yep, and can we find a small interval where we know the rise and run?
Well, we know two points (the x intercept, y intercept)
Could we use the rise/run formula on these two points?
This step isn't correct, one of them should be negative
run -1 and rise 3
And how did you work out those numbers?
When you do that, remember to "start" counting from the same point
oh would it be -3
Yes
1/-3
yes
What's our answer then?
so would it be y=1/-3x+-3
What's rise?
Yes
so just -3
Correct
We don't need "+-3" at the end, just "-3" is good
so itll just e y=-3x-3
Yep, that's our final answer
No problem
.close
Closed by @severe flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove the statement is true using mathematical induction:
2^(n-1) ≤ n!
where n is an integer greater than or equal to 1
what have you tried
ok so hypothesis is
2^(k-1) = k!
induction step is
2^k = (k+1)!
is this correct
2^k = 2^(k-1) + 2^k <= k! + 2^k
where 2^(k-1) = k!
so you just get
k! + 2^k <= k! + 2^k
I'm not sure if this is correct
you need <= in hypothesis and you need base case
why
this shit confusing
the way I solved it just comes from this
I feel like its essentially the same way
you have to get the end result though
What that’s literally 0<=0
You would use the inductive hypothesis to go to the inductive step
si suppose 2^(n-1) < n! for some n>=2
2^(n-1) x 2 = 2^n < 2 x n! < (n+1) x n! = (n+1)!
ok so how about this
inductive step is
2^k <= (k+1)!
you could say
2^(k-1)+ 2^k <= (k+1)!
?
k! + 2^k <= (k+1)!
then find a way algebrically to make the left equal the right
@steady bluff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i got y
i forgot how do i get x
do i need to plug y=1 in
also is y correct
is that the correct way to do it?
insert one of them
even though its
elimination
after you elimination the y of course
I think it's okay
btw how do i write out my ansawer on my computer to enter it in
I think y=1 and x= -2
idk how to do this one
dont i need t o mulitply the 2nd one by 3?
but then both y and x will =0
so idk what i need to do
.close
Closed by @silver oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
😔 what should I do next
0.8660254038? ( I put this in a calc)
And that’s a unit circle value
😋 yup
and it should be easy to continue
Closed by @loud drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
May I know how to solve this and get the critical points
In the first equation, it is a quadratic as a function of y with x constant, so y has two solutions for every x.
Symmetrically the second equation is a quadratic as a function of x with y constant, so x has two solutions for every y
Those generate 4 solutions as expected
I don’t know how to solve that
You don't know how to solve a quadratic?
I never solve two equations that both contain quadratic
I only know to to solve quadratic with one variable and here, it’s has xy
Solve one at a time and treat one parameter as a constant
For example, 24y - 12xy - 4y^2 = 0 implies y^2 + 3xy - 6y = 0 then using the quadratic formula or factoring, you get y(y + 3x-6) = 0 so y = 0 or y + 3x-6 = 0.
Your solutions for the first equation are a function of x
I don’t really und
I can get y=0
But the one that contains x and y
Is it compare with the another equation or how?
where did the -4y go
I thought need to substitute y=0 in if not how can I get (0,0) and (0,6)
Can you solve (x-2)(x-3) = 0
Yes
So what is x?
2, 3
Ok, so if x = 2
What you are doing right now is going
"I'm now looking at (x-3)"
"and I know x = 2"
"so (2-3) = 0"
Huh?
Do you agree that if you have ab = 0, then a = 0 or b = 0
Yea for this
But u can’t und why you sub 2 to x-3
and when you are looking at the value of a, you don't care abou the value of b?
I don’t und what you actually mean
You have the equation
y (24 - 12 x - 4 y) = 0
That is the product of two numbers
y times 24 - 12x - 4y
Similarly, you have no problem with (x-2) times (x-3)
which is also the product of two numbers.
So the working I sub y=0 previously is correct?
When you have (x-2) times (x-3), you know that if x = 2, you have zero times (x-3) which is all zero, and when x = 3, you have (x-2) times 0 which is also 0
Yet what you are doing here is taking y times (24-12x - 4y) and saying ok, y = 0 makes the whole thing zero, now I am going to plug in zero into the right side.
And that should not make sense.
Then why you sub x=2 here?
Okay, nvm, I think you’re referring what I’m doing
My point is that is what you are doing, which doesn't make sense
Your factored form is y ( 24-12x - 4y) = 0, you know this is a quadratic, so if x doesn't change, there are two solutions
One is when y = 0, the other is when 24-12x-4y = 0.
Okay, well, if I use 24-12x-4y and 24-6x-8y, I can only get (4/3, 2)
If x and y both =0
How to use
That’s why I can only get the last critical point here
So if y = 0 is a solution, you need to go back to the second equation and check what solutions it has when you set y = 0 there
Then you need to check what solutions it has when -4y - 12x + 24 = 0
Nvm
I think I’ll ask again later
Thanks for your help
Sorry I really can’t und what you’re trying to say
.close
Closed by @fickle patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just gonna latex it just a sec
suds
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
passes through the point (16,2). Find the image of the point (16,2) under the following linear transformations
I have no idea what "find the image of the point" means, never had that terminology used
first question linear transformation is
,tex $ \log_4(x) + 3
suds
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
we want to find the "corresponding point" after the transformation
we have a point (x,y) [one of a collection of points satisfying the equation] and we applied a transformation to that point and its collection
what kind of transformation was it?
a horizontal translation by 3
is it like the same "part" of the graph but with the adjusted equation
like say its a polynomial and theres a peak at (16,3) where the peak would be if it went through a linear transformation?
well we started with y = log_4(x) and now we have y = log_4(x) + 3. did we change the "x" or the "y"?
yes
so is it 19,2?
bc we've adjusted the y
and for something like log_4(x-3) it would be 16, -1?
or would it be log_4(-1)
we have (x,y) = (16,2) to start with
yes
my question is basically, what stays the same?
because you can sub the y or the x value
so if we shift "y" by 3, then we would expect the second component to change
we have that originally (x,y) = (16,2) satisfied the equation y = log_4(x). then we would expect (x,y) = (16, ?) to satisfy the equation y = log_4(x) + 3
oh okay
wait
so the x value is constant?
(i mixed up my x and y before sorry)
but it would be y = log_4(16) + 3
so 16,5?
yes
does the x value stay constant in any transformation?
we would expect x to change if we changed the part where x is. so y = log_4(x - 3) would be a shift of 3 to the right
in that example x would change and y would not
ok thank you
thats perfect
its pretty easy tbh but i just haven't ever heard the term phrased like that
but we could also have y = log_4(x - 2) + 4 in which case both would change
if both change would you solve for one transformation (say log_4(x-2) and then sub the new x value to solve for the new y?
yes, although you may also observe by inspection that the point moves 2 units right and 4 units up
yes
oh im so stupid i realise what it is now
its basically what x and y values do you need for the linear transformation to be at the same point as the original
we can think of these equations as defining a set of points (x,y) that satisfy those equations. Then applying these transformations changes all of those points at once (in the same way as we found for individual points)
like -log_4(-x) the coords are (-16, -2) because when you substitute it, you will get the original point of (16,2)
yes
Closed by @snow latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, how do you do this question?
@sharp vigil 🥺
two vectors are perpendicular if their dot product is 0
I realised that part, dont know what else to do now
find the dot product and set it equal to 0
@remote ledge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @remote ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
Im back
I still need help
For a geometric series where the first term is -6 and the common ratio is 4, determine S6. (2 marks)
a is the first term -6
r is the common ratio 4
n is the term number 6
That's all ik for now
use the formula
@winged blade You haven't answered my last question, it seems like you don't quite understand geometric series yet.
If the first term of a geometric series is 1 and the common ratio is 2, can you tell me the first 5 numbers in the series? If not, what's confusing you?
I'm confused man
hes clearly currently taking an exam (as shown by the fact that the copy pasted version of the question has "2 marks" next to it) and is being rude as well as academically dishonest. not only are the rules against helping him, he doesnt deserve the help either
homework can have marks as well, i dunno
sure maybe
i mean if you want to help him then i couldnt stop u, but im clearly not as nice as you
ill leave u to it then
i mean, fwiw i solved the sum just for practice
but if this is academic dishonesty
then im not showing how to do it
What are you confused about? Do you understand the terms "first number" and "common ratio" in this context?
Yes
So if the first number is 1 and the common ratio is 2, what's the second number in the series?
2
the second number would be 2
I'm asking arz
Then 4
oh no, sorry, i didnt see the name
Cuz multiply by 2?
Yes
Ok
So what are the first numbers in the series?
Yes
sum is just when you add them all together
it wont be 23 tho
So what is the sum of these numbers?
31
Yes, exactly
Okok
So in the series with the first number of 1 and a common ratio of 2, the sum of the first 5 numbers is 31.
Does that make sense?
Yep
"the sum of the first 5 numbers" is written down as S5.
Ohhhh
So you need to do the same steps for your question:
- List the first 6 numbers of your geometric series
- Add them up
-6 * 4 is not 24
yea essentially. youre just gonna need to multiply it by 4
first term * 4 = second term
second term * 4 = third term
and so on
you can do all of this, and you get your 6 terms
then you just add em all up
Ohh ok
this isnt the fastest way by any means
but its the basic principle
yea essentially
Alr
like lets say i have to find the sum of 5 terms of a geometric sequence that is 1,2,4,8,6.
Thats gonna be 1*(32-1)/1
Ohhh ok
which simplifies to 31
Yea
and is way easier than doing all the efforyt
especially if i asked you to find the sum of the first 1000 terms
Yea true
@winged blade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @winged blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone confirm i did this correctly
,rotate
Thankyou
,calc 6000*(1+0.07/365)^(3*365)
Result:
7401.9193249465
looks good
discord eating the *
Yepyep I just noticed the slightly tilted 3
btw no need to write the ^ on paper
I write it because I get it confused with multiplication otherwise
that's just text/coding notation to represent exponention
I'll type x # instead of xy if I do it without the ^
try get used to aligning what you write
, rotate
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
@tall trench Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
An elevator in the Mariott Marquis skyscraper in New York has a total travel length of 190m. Its maximum speed is 5.08 m/s, while its acceleration is 1.22 m/s^2. a) Starting from rest, what distance does it take to reach maximum speed? b) How long does the complete stroke take, taking into account the acceleration and deceleration phases?
how do you do point b?
the time and distance it takes to accelerate from 0 to 5.08
is the same time and distance it takes to de-accelerate from 5.08 to 0
Why?
Point $a$ is $v(t) \approx 10,6m$
Yes
jandro
Why?
Explain pls
<@&268886789983436800>
@proud wharf sent a random video Just tò troll
the acceleration is 1.22 m/s^2 no?
that applies for both when it is acceelrating and de-acclerating
accelerating at 1 m/s^2 for 5 seconds gets you to 5 m/s, de-accelerating at 1 m/s^2 for 5 seconds at 5 m/s gets you to 0
What if the deceleration had been different?
But in this case is the deceleration when the elevator is about to stop?
Yes i would think so
How are these problems addressed?
you would just have to do two different calculations
instead of 1 and just doubling it
?
But if they are different, how do I know at what time it starts to decelerate?
So the distance traveled during decceleration is the same as the distance traveled during acceleration?
it travels 190 meters
Yes
assuming the acceleration starts from meter 0, to get it to full speed takes 4.16 seconds
in this time the elevator covers a dsitance of 10.6 meters
Yes
Yes now?
you have about 180 meters remaining
We know that t_acc = t_decc
Yes
Ya
It does not
Ok
at the start and the end it accelerates ot that speed
and thus is not going it
but it does for most the run
you have to make some assumptions here like it will always accelerate to maximum speed ect
so basically no one presse the lift button at any other floor
only top and botrtom floor
+- yea
mhm
I am blocked with this 170 m
how so
Idk
@desert solar Has your question been resolved?
@desert solar
What
Click x
Yes
@finite crown
it travels
170 meters
at a speed of 5.08 m/s
170 / 5.08 gets you time
its original 190 meters
but it takes 10 meters to acceelrate
and de-acceralte
so takeaway 20 from 190
I think yes
@desert solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need to find the Transitive reflexive closure for this relation
{(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 3), (0, 4), (1, 1), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 3), (4, 1), (4, 4)}
I Wouldve said i add (1,0) (2,3) (4,1) (2,1)
I'm a little confused, isn't that relation already transitive and reflexive?
At least for {0,1,2,3,4}
reflexive? yes
why (1, 0)?
(2, 3) is already in the relation
@brazen bluff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
help
the khan solution
why do they multiply by 2
what am i doing wrong
i followed the guy steps
ok
what am i doing wrong i got the answer wrong
how do i simplify
idk how
Kebesque Integral
no
i suck at m ath
so im doing it right but
its just not simplified so thats why its wrong
technically its right but its not simplified so they mark it as wrong?
not sure
i guess for here u multiply by 0.5
so it cancels out the 73/0.5
the 0.5 in the 73/0.5
well i already 100% algebra 1
and i am like 50% done with algebra 2
so u multiply by 0.5
wait nvm
cause if u do 73 * 0.5 its 30 something
man idk
dwasdfgawe
WAFASDAS
faiyrose

why are you using ln for base 10
here
@harsh fern Has your question been resolved?
yep exactly
noo
which one
is this the correct solution
thats just pedantry
anyway next time just use ln i guess
i hav eused
log many times before
and everytime it seemed like it was fine with it
theres something wrong with khan academy
you see minor inconveniences like this
always marks me wrong and i always have to restart
wasting my time
absolutely unbelivable
ive been stuck on this same problem for like 2 hours now
why does khan academy not understand this..
lmao look if i type in log it understands
if i type in ln it doesnt
but ln was the correct answer and log wasnt
yes ln is defined to be log_e
khan academy has lost its mind
esca (@ with reply)
ok whats the difference
see above
right but look at the base
ln is log base e, not just log
sometimes people will write log to mean ln, but usually best practice is use ln for log base e
yeah
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I've been stuck on this question for over an hour and honestly, I'm going insane right now. It would be very much appreciated if anyone could help me on this. Thanks!
ive tried using the similar triangles to find a formula for the variable radius of the cone but it says its the wrong answer
this is what i did
Okay, so it sounds like the first thing you need is to know the radius of the frustrum at a given height. Let h=0 mark the bottom base, and h=12 the top. Can you find r, given h?
What did you get? I'm not seeing it on the paper
r = (24-x)/2
Oh so x is like depth below the tank, I see
i used the similar triangles to find the radius by d/(12-x) = 6/12 where d is the radius at any height x
after that i used the density of water and the area of a 2 dimensional slice of the frustum to integrate
Okay, so you define $x$ as the depth into the tank. And you define the radius as $h(x)=12-\frac{x}{2}$
SWR
you should use r, not d, which can be confused with diameter
yep
So the area of at any height $x$ is $A(x)=\pi\left(12-\frac{x}{2}\right)^2$
SWR
I do not see how you got here
so the question gave me 62.5lb/ft^3 as the density of water
What is this symbol?
r. sorry lol my handwriting is bad
the radius is 6+d
where 6 is the radius of the cylinder thing
Okay, so 62.5 is your volumetric density (let's call it $\rho$ for now).
SWR
Now here's the the problem. What is $\pi [r(x)]^2dx$? It's your differential volume, $dV$. So what does $\int \rho dV$ represent? Use dimensional analysis if unsure
SWR
i thought i could solve it by integrating the area function from 0 to 12 to find the volume, and then multiply it by the density
honestly im lost
What is volume x density?
mass
So $\int \rho dV$ is just giving you total mass. You want work
SWR
So let's work backwards. You want work: $W$. So, let's think of $\int dW$. How can we define the differential work $dW$?
SWR
Okay, so $W=\int \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{s}$
SWR
oh yeah
Now here's the fun bit, which force are we acting against?
gravity
downwards, or negative i think
oops it should be negative of the integral
oh
Let me actually skip a few things, are you familiar with W=mgh?
So, how can we define $dW$?
SWR
potential energy per dH
no. Differential mass will be a function of height (x)
oh ok
so i would have to integrate the area of a circular cross section of the frustum right to find the volume
No. You want the differential volume to get the differential mass
right. but i have its density for that right
@untold frigate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The digits of a four-digit positive integer add up to $14$. The sum of the two middle digits is nine, and the thousands digit minus the units digit is one. If the integer is divisible by $11$, what is the integer?
studying_calc_real_analysis
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
And a - d = 1
ye
And b + c = 9
So you have three equations and four variables
The fourth condition is not an equation but it almost is
Yes
1000a + 100b + 10c + d = 14
?
wdym
Not 14
the given number can only be completely divided by 11 if the difference of the sum of digits at odd position and sum of digits at even position in a number is 0 or 11.
@lost flax
@scarlet raptor
Or -11
Or 22, et cetera
But yes, that is the idea
?
what about it
This number is divisible by 11
how so
However, if you do the difference
9+8+9 = 26
3+1 = 4
26-4 = 22
Which is not 0 nor 11
It is a multiple of 11
can you explain for dummies
It is exactly 11*8529
The true rule of divisibility of 11 is the following:
,calc 11 * 8529
Result:
93819
The given number can only be completely divided by 11 if the difference of the sum of digits at odd position and sum of digits at even position in a number is 0, 11, 22, 33, 44... or -11, -22, -33,...
a multiple of 11
Yes
what about it
^
Not this
Then, because of the rule I told you, 11 | a - b + c - d too
a+b+c+d = 14
a-b+c-d = 0, or 11, or -11, ...
b+c = 9
a -d = 1
"a-b+c-d = 0, or 11, or -11, ..."
The second one is actually not an equation
can you elaborate on this?
Yes
a-d=1
You can substitute that
In a-b+c-d = 0, or 11, or -11, ...
And obtain -b+c+1 = 0, or 11, or -11, ...
Why?
$1 - b + c = 0$ "or" $=11$ "or" $=-11$...
studying_calc_real_analysis
I cant
So -b+c+1 = 0, or 11, or -11, ... --> -(9-c) + c + 1 = 0, or 11, or -11,...
Do you agree?
@stoic imp ?
The sum of the two middle digits is nine
b+c=9
b=9-c
okay
So you substitute that b
ye
Here -b+c+1 = 0, or 11, or -11, ...
what then?
-(9-c) + c + 1 = 0, or 11, or -11,...
==> -(9-c) + c + 1 = 0, or 11, or -11,..
==> 2c - 8 = 0, or 11, or -11,...
So it is between 0 and 9
oh yeah, c is digit.
So for example if I choose 2c - 8 = 1100
That makes no sense
And the same applies for almost all possible equations
okay
Except for one
ok
Can you see which one?
Well, if you choose -11, or -22, or something negative
You have 2c - 8 = that
2c = 8 + that
And (8 + that) will be a negative number
Do you agree?
so what?
8-11 = -3
8-22 = -14
I know
okay
It can't be negative
right.
In a similar way
If you choose 22 or something larger
8 + the number will be at least 30
okay
2c = something that is at least 30
c = something that is at least 15
Impossible again
Only two possibilities are left
2c-8=0
2c-8=11
2c=8
okay
2c=19
And this one gives c=9.5 which is absurd again
why?
Because c is a digit
so only 0 is good
Yes
^
so what?
And you can solve for the rest of digits easily
????
^
Use the equations
a+b+c+d = 14
c = 4
b+c = 9
a-d = 1
Yes, that is very easy to solve
How can you make the text to look like this?
# and space
3542
Yes
Closed by @stoic imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Help with partial factoring
I don’t fully understand how to do it
Like explain how to do it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How’d they find m in this equation?
geometrically speaking, and as in the solution, no solution implies distinct, parallel lines. and infinite many solutions would imply that they are the same lines
what can you say about the gradient if two lines are parallel?
The same
Wait are they just solving both equations for y and equating them to each other to find m?
so they made an equation that is "gradient of 1=gradient of 2"
and solved for m
i dont quite understand what you mean
Like for example 2m + 3x= y and 6m - 4x = y so 2m +3x=6m -4x to solve for m
in this case the lines will never be parallel since the gradient of the two lines are distinct
Ok like for example is that what they’re doing to solve for m
yes, because m is used to find the gradient
the logic is as follows:
If the lines are parallel, then the gradient are the same,
the gradient are 2-m and -m/2, and they must be the same when the lines are parallel
hence if the lines are parallel: 2-m=-m/2
is this part clear?
@dusk nimbus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i split this up?
Oh u use AoPS
8x^3+2x+2x+2x+2x+2x+1/4x^2+1/4x^2+1/4x^2+1/4x^2
can this work
wth is your problem man
i got it to the minimum value of $10\sqrt[10]{\frac{1}{8}}$
Skill_Issue
lol is grapher allowed
dunno
buy one then
what
buy a graphing calculator
for??
If you put them over 3, this is pretty easy to see as the arithmetic mean of the 3 terms. That get anywhere?
<@&268886789983436800>
is it supposed to
it works, minimal value can be achieved by solving 8x^3=2x=1/4x^2
Closed by @dapper kraken
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
With this diagonal matrix do I need to do something to show that I can calculate the norm as if it were a vector?
Since there's only values on the diagonal, I can treat it like a vector
@next barn Has your question been resolved?
@next barn Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @next barn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is going on with those symbols...
Which symbols? If you mean the Greek letters, then $\mu$ is the mean, and $\sigma^{2}$ is the variance, $\sigma$ is the standard deviation
X13warzone
No worries then, you know how to solve the problem now?
if the weird U is mean then why do they ask for expected value...
It's been a while since I did stats, but usually expected value, mean, mu mean the same thing
the expected value formula is wild tho
It's just a convention that mathematicians use only symbols in the more mathy sections