#help-38
1 messages · Page 235 of 1
Okay, makes sense
Well, you see it forms a triangle, you can determine its base length at the beginning
You know as soon as I drew that graph I should have noticed the triangle haha
(assuming the midpoint of the upper line can move in the range +/- 1.5 along the x-axis)
And how would I derive the deviation of the connection point along dotted line
What is the base length? Can you tell me?
I mean, can you determine it looking at these constraints
Yeah, 3”
Perfect, let's go ahead then
And the altitude is 4.5”
Okay, so the y-coord is given, right
Let me elaborate a bit further
So from here you can also determine the angle of rotation
Using trig
(if needed)
Just draw a circle with center at the origin and radius length 4.5
then you will be able to find where the end of the dashed line is after rotation
oh true
finally, you will calculate how far the intersection point of the dashed line with the upper straight line is from the intersection point of the circle with the dashed line (after rotation)
Closed by @rapid vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show that if for $x \in \mathbb{R}$ the following holds
[
|a_1 \sin x + a_2 \sin(2x) + \cdots + a_n \sin(nx)| \leq |\sin x|,
]
then
[
|a_1 + 2a_2 + \cdots + n a_n| \leq 1.
]
Halex
can only use continuity and differentiation
Did you try taking the derivative of the first sum in abs val on the left
$\frac{d}{dx}\Big(a_1 \sin x + a_2 \sin(2x) + \cdots + a_n \sin(nx)\Big) =
a_1 \cos x + 2a_2 \cos(2x) + \cdots + n a_n \cos(nx)$
Halex
Evaluating the derivative both sides in 0 would make it, right?
@manic jackal Has your question been resolved?
@manic jackal Has your question been resolved?
Yes cos(0) = 1
@manic jackal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ABCD is a rectangle with AB = 8 and BC = 6, E is a point on CD such that EC = 2, F is the midpoint of EB find AF
so i got the answer using analitical geom
by defining D(0, 0) we obtain A = (0, 6) and F = (7, 3) and using the distanace formula AF is attained
How do i find AF using Eucledian Geometry?
Try using the Pythagorean theorem
To obtain BE
BE is 2\sqrt(10)
Nice
Now can you use it again to find AF?
Note that F is the midpoint of BE
but AFB is not right angle so we get back to same calculations as in mentioned analytical geom
i have an idea of constructing CF then using the british flag
ah indeed
since EFC is an isosceles
shit i got trolled by diagram
we can extend AF to point K so AF = FK, this way K will be on line DC, and EK = AB
then you will have simple Pythagorean for AKD
smart
ftr i think coordinate geometry is more than fine for this problem method-wise
it isn't really all that contrived especially given you are working with a rectangle
which enables a very natural coordinatization
yea euclid geom for this types of problems is just magical
i would also resort to analytical methods like coords, complex, or trig
ty all
.close
Closed by @tired shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
somebody give a simple proof of Silverman–Toeplitz theorem i get headache reading any >2page proof 😦
thats the one about regular matrix summability methods incase you forgot
can use concepts in functional analysis such as weak star convergence
thanks
i am now reading the proof in my book again, let yall know when im finished!
uhhh somebody help plz <@&286206848099549185>
@river wasp Has your question been resolved?
whatever ill just google
Closed by @river wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ques 13
Multiply the mean and extreme terms and then sub x^2 + 5x = u
hint: group the two middle terms and the two other terms
It'll turn into a solvable equation
Biquadratic 
Trying
i thought of doing
(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) = -1/(x+1)
graph both sides
💀
Decent but painstaking
sounds like an utter nightmare to me
I am only getting 2 roots but answer is 4
like i already have factors , i can see concavity , and 1/x+a is general to me-
,w solve (x + 1)(x + 2)(x + 3)(x + 4) + 1 = 0
2 roots it is
and ^
bro they are same
yeah no idea where the other ones came up
But we should count repeated roots too, unless question asks 'solutions'
Or vice versa
I forgot
these aren't duplicates
there are no repeated roots , 2 are complex
,w plot (x + 1)(x + 2)(x + 3)(x + 4) - 1 = y
Closed by @pulsar jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I solved this question by transformation of roots but ans is -5 , what did i not get right ans by that method
expand everything :D
also type .reopen
.reopen
✅
you subbed x = y + 2 and x = y - 2?
use Vieta's theorem maybe?
Wait
Is this what "transformation of roots" is?
oh that's smart
Yh but thats not what i did
It will help
and you just sub x=-2 for the other one
Since you only need to extract two constant terms
Oh much better haha
yeas and take care of the signs
I made an equation in Y whose roots are (2-alpha/alpha+2) , (2-beta/2+beta), (2-gamma/2+gamma)
So X=2(y-1)/(-y-1)
And the product of roots will be equal to whats asked
ok continue with ur method 🙏
I didnt ignore it, i was busy typing my approach
sounds like an utter nightmare to do
Yh but i did solve it and i get 5/3 which is one of the options
the other approach takes little calculation time once you made that observation
Yh
I already have that solution with me
Just wanted to ask where i went wrong
Thanks
.close
Closed by @pulsar jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ignore the pen markings
Try changing the x to 2x
@glad timber Has your question been resolved?
Hm k will try
This is a test question so I’d just recommend trying to find a function that works
@glad timber Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glad timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, if X and Y are two events which are independent, are ~X and Y also always independent events?
yep
Mhhm, you can prove this algebraically as well
can u pls provide the proof please? if you have a link possibly
It follows from the law of total probability
If X and Y are independent events
then
P(X and Y) = P(X) P(Y) (1)
Using law of total probability:
P(Y) = P(Y and X) + P(Y and ~X)
P(Y and ~X) = P(~X and Y)
P(~X and Y) = P(Y) - P(Y and X)
Using (1)
P(~X and Y) = P(Y) - P(X) P(Y)
P(~X and Y) = P(Y) (1 - P(X))
P(~X and Y) = P(Y) P(~X) (2)
tilde is \sim
ohhh
(for some reason)
thx
sim for similar triangles
Closed by @jolly pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, is anyone able to help me with this?
im sorry i dont understand what your saying
english is not my first language so im very sorry
u sure?
wait 1 second
ohhh
yes they are the same
so that makes them co incident
so does that mean they are infitely many solution?
bingo
yes
but i am also confused because it says determine without solving
ye
u havent tried to solve it
u just noticed the similarity
okay, thanks for your help. Is it fine if i ask anymore questions in the future?
my final exam is tommorow, so im in desperate need of help
ye
thank you very much 🙏 god bless you
im sorry if im causing an annoyance but i also need help with this.
"is moving faster"
Ant B
in term of speed, yup
but idk the others
i think t=0 means they moved 0 cm
and the constants mean the point where the originally started
ye
so thats b
thats one way, yup
do u do t=10?
so we replace t with 10? im sorry im not the sharpest at math
40+20= 60 and 60+8=68, so after 10 seconds, the difference is 8 cm?
thats what im thinking but i am not sure
if two people meet at 6 o'clock and will meet again 10 hours after that, what time will they meet
4 am
6'oclock in the morn
*pm
16:00
so t= 16
ill calculate it and could you please tell me if its correct?
aight
the difference is 20cm?
i think ik the mistake
Result:
-20
yup
thank you very much, from now if i feel stuck on anything, ill send it to this channel. thank you so much.
sorry for the annoyance, but would you be able to help with question 41? I feel enough information is not provided.
how do you do that? neither x or y is given a value.
⭐️ https://www.cognito.org/ ⭐️
*** WHAT'S COVERED ***
- Introduction to simultaneous linear equations.
- The Elimination Method for solving simultaneous equations.
- Worked Examples.
*** EXAM BOARD INFO ***
This video is suitable for maths courses around the world.
KS3 - All on your course
GCSE Foundation - All on your course
GCSE...
i figured it out, using the elimination method. im sorry lol i learnt this like 3 months ago, this is for my final exam so i just forgot.
i got x=4.5 and y=8
im pretty sire thats correct bc chatgpt agrees with me
,w 3x+4y = 45.50 and 5x+4y = 54.50
wonderful
k
can you help with this? ik c but idk a and b.
ik, but i need 2 points on the line, i only had 1.
Make it straight that’s all
Still acceptable
ok thanks!!
U don’t the points so there ain’t a perfectly u find a linear regression using that
In addition, the formula for it is hideous
Then just find the slope of ur line
Do u know how to find linear regression using a calc
there is no calc allowed in the exam. and im sorry but i dont understand whats linear regression
Method of finding Line of best fit
Essentially
i got y=9/2x-1.5
It’s in the acceptable range
also what does it mean by interpret the slope? do i just write the slope down?
Maybe explain what it means in this context?
wait so as long as i use points on the line to find slope and y intercept its correct?
thanks 🙏
in my school, student do not know who grades their exams. its randomized everytime, our exams are not held inside class, its held in an exam hall. so im just hoping the teachee who grades it doesnt hate me
💀
@mental isle
The idea is that you plot the points
Then you find the line of best fit
(either by linear regression or eyeballing it, depending on your level)
And then you use the line of best fit to find the slope
Any 2 points on the line of best fit will work
i remember my teacher saying take the highest point and lowest point on the line to find slope
alright thank you
The data points may or may not lie on the line of best fit
Most of the time, most of them won't
im confused very much because even the books answers are different from mine, so idk whether im correct or not
Does the book give an acceptable range?
Also, use a ruler to draw the line of best fit. Your line is very wavy in the picture
this is what the answers in the book are usually
"any value close to -0.5 is acceptable"
im scared ill just screw over the exam and fail bc most times my answer doesnt match it
Is it close usually?
most times
So it should be fine then
Yeah a range would be better
@mental isle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tanθ+sinθ=m tanθ-sinθ=n
Then prove secθ=√mn cosec^2 θ
you could express tan and sin pretty easily
this is one of those substitute into the expression and simplify
and with tan and sin, you can express sec and cosec very easily
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
though there will be some extra steps needed
perhaps it might be better substituting for m and n instead
Bro I'm stuck for like 40 minutes
the first step was given lol
substitute the expressions for m and n into √mn cosec^2 θ
@livid kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
he;[
What exactly is it showing to be wrong
Also there can be multiple congruence criteria here
maybe my wording is wrong?
oh?
your answer to a) makes no sense
where are you getting "size of angles" from?
i meant length
Length of angle?
I think you should read once more the question of the exercise
(suggestion: angles don't have anything to do with this)
wait
i know that you use pythagoras to find out the shorter side of triangle A
which is 5
and the length of sides 5 and 12 match
which makes it a sas
@dusty sleet
It could also be SSS
Overall, the question is worded oddly, and if you are being graded by AI, then I pray for your soul
i am bro 😭
all of my homework is graded by ai 🙏
sit around all day and make us watch other people's videos
nah my history teacher was making us watch thoes brainrot science videos with subway surfer clips 😭
where do you go to school, if you don't mind answering such a personal question
nah its alr i go to Brompton Academy
lmfao 🙏
shouldve went to a grammar school man
@kindred pier can u give me a model perfect answer for the question?
should've went to gamer school
🙏 if only
Not really. 😦 The question is kinda worded badly. I feel like even the question was generated by AI. But for part A, use pythag to find the length of the missing side of triangle A. Then, it is clear that the two shorter sides match
I’ve seen this software, it is quite stupid with the wording of some answers
alright bet ill try make something up
MathsWatch 🔥 🔥
@dusty sleet bro i got mocks next week am i cooked?
@sharp stream Has your question been resolved?
@sharp stream Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m sorry for the unreadability but I’m trying to evaluate $\int_0^{\infty}\frac1{x^{2n}+1}dx$ for $n>\frac12$
Bump
@empty orchid Has your question been resolved?
@empty orchid Has your question been resolved?
Bump
<@&286206848099549185>
having a hard time deciphering what's happening here
I’m just summing the residues based on the p/q theorem
dyxn mentioned it earlier in #「helpers-lounge」
Since they’re all simple poles the residues will be $\frac1{\dv{z}(z^{2n}+1)}\bigg\vert_{z=c_k}$
;(
Then I just continue with a geometric sum approach
tbh it seems fine as long as you havent messed up some calculations or simplifications
the logic is rigght
as for the summing i cant read that im sorry 💀
Yeah sorry
I was on the road
I can take a better picture
I also have a shit phone
that part is correct
but i think a professor wouldnt be so forgiving for that transition i pointed at
oh nvm i didnt see the i
DUDE THATS PI????
OMG
naaah
My handwriting is shit
you deserve reductions for that
I cannot be bothered to TeX right now, I hiked 5 miles today
jk lol your proof is fine
Ok thanks
im stuck with isomorphism's and im not reading letters like im used to

I’m gonna end up getting glasses at this rate
Alright I’m gonna go watch some good fútbol
Cya. And thanks!
.close
Closed by @empty orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does this even mean
what is "no 2 parallel" and "no 3 concurrent"?
- "no two parallel": No two of the lines go in the same "direction". Aka every pair of lines intersects exactly once.
- "no three concurrent":No three of the lines meet at the same point. So this is essentially saying that no two pairs of lines both meet at the same point.
does this mean that line x iwll intersect x-1 lines?
this is correct if you imagine placing the lines one at a time
but in your case it is better to say that every line intersects every other line
can we show that n lines make n regions
nvm
can u just explain the solution
after drawing i can see that the second line after intersecting the first creates 2 new regions and the third creates 3 more after intersecting the 2 lines but can this be made intuitive
ok so it looks like they do think of the lines as being placed one at a time
here are two lines. they make four regions.
what does it mean by no two pairs of lines can meet at a point
can 4 lines meet at a point?
yes
so <3 lines can meet at a point
basically 2
here are 3 lines now with the freshly-drawn one in red.
the red line intersects the previous two and so passes through 3 regions slicing each one in two
Closed by @tired badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what did i do wrong?
I was asked to differentiate
looks right to me
That's why
if it looks different from your answer key, youre probably missing algebra
I've read through this 3 times
Oh nvm I looked at the wrong solution
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @wise sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how am i supposed to do this
Bro u literally know g(x) , then whats the problem with f(x)?
I can't get it
Ahh
U messed up
The trash in g(x) should be in f(x)
And then
g(x) = √(x+5) -(1-x)
Just verify by limits
Nah g(x) is wrong
if the computer says its right im sure its probably right my man
I believe it was made by my teacher
I've had to email him a few times already
I've got no clue what it could be
Put it in desmos
-5 to -1 the parabola hits itself instead of the other function
thecrumbeler2
Any other suggestions
oh alr
say wut now
lel
F
alright desmos maybe
nah no comma
Ok anyways
As u can see for x belonging [-5,-1] there's only -ve branch
Ye
,w integrate (1 - x - sqrt(x+5)) from -5 to -1 + integrate (1 - x + sqrt(x+5)) from -1 to 4
,w plot y=1-x, y=sqrt(x+5), y=-sqrt(x+5) from x=-5 to 4
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
mah bad
wait wut, he already got it tho
huh
Oh, so you're checking?
yeah
and somehow it gave 20.833 but its wrong?
whjat
hold on
,w integrate (1 - x - sqrt(x+5)) from -5 to -1 + integrate (1 - x + sqrt(x+5)) from -1 to 4
(1 - x - sqrt(x+5)) thats not right
yeah
which according to the computer is right
but the function i used to get it for f(x) is somehow wrong?
and why is the minus sign highlighed?
ive gone insane already
Why are you guys taking the line
It doesn't even cut the graph at -5
It's just the parabola that covers the area until the POI
how would i find that area
By integrating just the parabola
sqrt(x+5)?
not it
Nvm
,w integrate (1 - x + sqrt(x+5)) from -5 to -1 + integrate (-1 + x + sqrt(x+5)) from -1 to 4
Yall still using the line....
im stumped because my answer is correct
yet it marks it wrong
executor is talking about something idk
and its 2am
so
rahhhhh
maybe ur teacher just like swapped aroung the terms a bit
i think this is what he means
this is -1 to 4
this is what ur trying to do with -5 to -1
what its supposed to be
bc this is what were finding
thats 1 to 4 you drew but ok
im sticking with 1 - x - sqrt(x+5) cause it got the right answer
Closed by @nimble niche
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
in dm
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
heulp... what did i do wrong here? I'm supposed to get ( 0,5 | -4,5 ) according to my work sheet
I wrote " • (-4,5)" but the answer 7,5 came from typing - ( -4,5) in my calculator, i just didn't erase that yet
Idk if - or • is right, both do not lead to x = 0,5
with multiplying it, the answer would be -13,5x = 3 | : (-13,5) which would lead to x = -0,2
So this system of two equations with two unknowns right?
I. 3x - y = 3
II. -3 - y = 6
Is this correct?
Yes, i think this is called Addition method, sorry didn't mention this
I'm learning math in German so it's kinda hard for me to translate the titles
Ok
Can you explain how did you get to -2y = 9?
Oh sorry I misread that part
and then i did it : (-2) to get one x which also makes the 9 to -4,5
It's oki!
The error comes from
I. 3x * (-4.5) = 3
it should be
I. 3x * (-(-4.5)) = 3
you are replacing y with -4.5 not 4.5
Also why are you multiplying it?
Ohhh, so when the equation says "-y or -x" it should be -(-4,5) when the number is negative! i get it
and the additional brackets are because of the *
The answer is now 13,5x But when i do 13,5x = 3 | : 13,5
I get this: x = 0,2 again
But like the 2 has a line above, does that mean it's 0,22222... ?
You should rewrite the I. equation and only change y to its value
You have rewritten I. 3x - y = 3 to I. 3x * y = 3 which you can't do
Maybe I misunderstood the problem, if yes, let me know
One sec
i didn't really rewrite the first equation, i just copied it from the work sheet yk
one sec
i think i gotta do - y * (-4,5)?
not 3 * (-4,5)
i just watched a short video
so basically -1 * (-4,5)
So you have two equations. You have calculated y, so now you can get x by subtituting y to any of those equations. You have done that, but the equation you've written in the bottom part of the paper is not the same as the original one. Does this make sense?
Bassically you're calculating different equation
Ohh
Hold up
Lemme send a pic i erased smth
I've put -4,5 in the place of y, so (-(-4,5)
what's the I equation?
that part is correct
It's 3x -y = 3
So why is there 3x * (-(-4.5)) = 3 and not 3x - (-4.5) = 3?
Idk in every tutorial video i saw they said you gotta multiply it 🥲
Maybe i understood it wrong?
So the right one would be 3x - not *?
You need to keep equations the same in the exercise
yes
can you send me the video you're watching?
Some exercises I've done were successful with the multiplying, I'll show you a picture
fine, I'll understand the numbers 😄
oh right, I'll show you one sec
https://youtu.be/TPOc0kgfkCU?si=cVpvEEe1BGnFYu4E At 10:20 she does a similar way of my problem rn
Additionsverfahren mit 2 Variablen
In diesem Mathe Lernvideo erkläre ich (Susanne) wie man lineare Gleichungssysteme mit 2 Variablen mit dem Additionsverfahren lösen kann. Wir addieren die Gleichungen und eliminieren dadurch eine Unbekannte und geben die Lösungsmenge an. Mathematik einfach erklärt.
0:00 Einleitung – Additionsverfahren mit...
Oh alright
So you need to know how you substitute (replace the letters with their values) the unknowns.
If you have 3x + y and x = 2 how would it look after substituting?
no, no
I mean -
I'll explain
Firstly, do you understand what are those letters in math like x and y?
Yes i do, x is the horizontal line and y is the vertical line in an coordinate system
And those two are the P (x | y) that i have to calculate
and as of now i only got y right
Yes, that's true, x and y represent axis in coordinate system.
But here the letters have different meaning. It's just coinsidence that they're called x and y. They could be called anything, a, b or 🍕.
They're variables which means, that they're representing certain value(like 1, 9, or 1657.1354). So your goal is to find values of these variables.
hold up
fixed
Hmm okay
So like x and y if you just write x and y
it's 1x and 1y?
they will always have a value?
I'll try to explain. I'm not a teacher so it may not be accurate, please let me know if you understand.
Sometimes you know the value and sometimes the value is defined trough equation for example x = 5 + 2 or 4 * x = 8. In some cases it's impossible to find a value, for example x + 1 = x, sometimes there are infinite correct solutions, for example x * 0 = 0.
Sorry for interrupting your explaining rn, But i tried doing it again, is this right maybe?
Ah, i understand
But i mean when u have 2 equations that "match" like 3x and -3x you can do that Addition method
And then u add both equations together and then u try to get y out of it or x for example
but now i inserted my y in the 1st equation and now I'm just stuck there yk
You could use lcm to use the addition method for any equations
cuz I can't get 0,5 out of it
what's lcm?
Nice, you corrected the 3x - (-4.5) = 3, but now you need to do -4.5 not +4.5
least common multiple
Oh i see, why?
Idk what that is sorry 🥲
why?
please correct rest of the calculation
Okay ima do it
Even if the coefficients are different, you can multiply each equation by the lcm divided by the other equation's corresponding coefficient to make the coefficients cancelable
I think the problem isn't there, he's using additon method
now i got 0,5 Thank you!! but I'm still confused why i have to do -4,5 instead of +4,5
Thanks for trying to help, I apprecheate it 😄
i mean -(-4,5) -4,5 makes 0? I'm kinda confused with that
ok
It's okay tysm!
Yw guys!
So you have
3x - (-4.5) = 3 ->3x + 4.5 = 3
do you understand this part?
xd
Negative and negative make positive
yes
I'm glad you understood it, have a nice day
Alright all cleared up now, Tysm!!
Thx you too :D
You've put a smile on my face
Closed by @nova jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
bye
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i know this has a oblique and horizontal asymptote
and ik the eqaution for the oblique asymptote by using polynominal long division but how do i find it for the horizontal asymptote
Are you allowed to plot the graph? What information are you able to gather?
Well consider what happens as $x \to \pm\infty$. We see that $\sqrt{x^2 + 1} \to x$ so what does this tell you about $y$ as $x \to \infty$ and $x \to -\infty$?
Awesam
so as apporaches infinity we can look at the dominant term x^2
yes
so could we replace that with infinity
and see what happens?
sqrt a very lardge number?
we look at the behavior as x approaches infinity
what happens to y as x becomes very negative or very positive?
and this will tell you what the asymptotes are
so sqrt x becomes very large and positive
well yes but specifically it becomes the function x
well, actually |x|
so if x is large and negative, we have y = x - x = 0 and as x is large and positive we have y = x + x = 2x
how do we know it becomes x
becuase that bit confuses me
we focus on the sqrtx^2+1
correct. as x becomes very large, we focus on the dominant term $x^2$. so we have $\sqrt{x^2}$ which is just equal to $|x|$
Awesam
also what does it mean by change in concavity
is this where the second derivative is 0 and the third is a different number?
@empty tulip Has your question been resolved?
@empty tulip Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove if B is a subset of A intersection B, then B is a subset of A. Do I have the proof correct? I just don't know how else to word this otherwise. Thank you.
thats an immensely disgusting and hard to read proof but it looks fine
Hhahahhahah. Understandable. 🤣 I really do not know how else to write it.
less words more symbols
I tried copying the exists symbol in my program, it broke what it looked like.
I could open it in doc and copy it into there though, if that's the issue.
I don't think it's a big deal, it's just a bit wordy but the logic is sound
you basically start with an element of B, given that B is a subset of A cap B, x must be in A cap B, hence x must be in A
Ok, that makes sense then. To be frank I've had trouble writing proofs a lot.
Thank you for checking over my work. Have a good day/night.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with these?
draw on the diagram the vector vz knowing that vz = vw + xy
?
its in french i translated it
wdym
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a pair (n,m) is shortened if
Can someone explain the "|" to me?
@flat spruce Has your question been resolved?
as in 2|6 and 2|8?
yes
so it's common divident?
think so
Closed by @flat spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey can someone tell me for 20 C how are C and D graphed?
@zinc timber Has your question been resolved?
have you tried other uhh
1s
so heres the one for A
ignore the extra bit, it's just numerical so its getting confused
and you may wanna try this site
saved my butt in diff eq
anyways
heres for the first one
which hopefully makes sense, your y is increasing up to a point
x is decreasing up to a point
then theyre both at the origin so no more changes
@zinc timber Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
I have an exam in exactly 23 Minutes , let's see if I get my answer by then :
<@&286206848099549185>
?
.close
Closed by @trim lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know how ud get rid of the 9 im blanking out 😵💫
bring it to natural number form
u get something like
3^(x+5) + 81 = 3^(4x) (10)
since it is a multiple of 10 on the rhs
so 3^(x+5) should end with 9
so I checked for the nearest value so I got 1
@void kindle sorry for the ping got what I told ?
@void kindle Has your question been resolved?
Il check it out later
but it looks pretty straight forward thx!
ok
il let u know in ab it
Gotchu thanks! but hol uppp im really lost rip
from which point do u bring it to natural number form??
no u've 1/9 right take lcm and bring that 9 to the other side
oooof i dont get it
which 9 are we taking where lol
and how do u use lcm
not 9
1/9
so it would be 3^x * 27 = 9^2x * (1/9 + 1) - 9?
ok wait let me write it
tyty
@void kindle
AIGHT got it thanks! W8 but what do we do after this just to double check?? sry it took so long too i got stumped way too many times somehow lol
@flint tinsel
this is how I did
how ?
bcos if we take 3^4x won't it go below 81 also ?
this is how I solved from here
OH alr i think i got it
like i get how u got to where u got
but when it came to x u just checked for the neareast value right??
based off of the right side
like 3^4x and 3^x+5
YE tyty
.close
Closed by @void kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
unlessss
np if u still didn't get it u can dm too
alrighty thanks :)
it makes sense
its just the way u got about it
i have to learn more and more ways so i can be more versatile
and not rely one 1 strat
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose the lung cancer rate is 30 per 100,000 people. Among all people, 20% are smokers. Smokers are 10 times more likely to develop lung cancer than nonsmokers. What is the probability that a smoker develops lung cancer? Steps to doing this problem?
Almost always, the hard part of these problems is to determine what these numbers are, in terms of common probability notation
P(what) = 20%?
You know, I started saying that, but now I'm realizing you're not given a lot of numbers hehe
Let me reset here
The big deal here is this equation:
P(L|S) = 10P(L|~S)
"Smokers are 10 times more likely to develop lung cancer than nonsmokers"
And we also have
P(S) = 0.2
P(L) = 30/10000
Yeah
Anyways, let's write that first equation using the conditional probability equation.
P(L ∩ S) / P(S) = 10P(L ∩ ~S) / P(~S)
Wait why is that the way to write it
Wait it’s not P(B|A)P(A)/ P(B)
That's Bayes'
I can't see a pretty way to apply it, no
Bayes' is great when the condition swaps, but it isn't really happening here
Unless I've misinterpreted the question?
Does this look right?
P(L|S) = 10P(L|~S)
And we want P(L|S)?
That leads to
P(LS) / P(S) = 10[P(L) - P(LS)] / [1 - P(S)]
With P(LS) being the only unknown, so we solve for it
And then we're handed P(L|S)
Wait LS is (0.0003 * 0.2) ?
Nu. P(LS) (which is P(L and S)) is unknown
Oh
I thought that was just multiplication oops
P(LS) / 0.2 = 10[0.0003 - P(LS)] / [1 - 0.2 ]
P(LS) / 0.2 = [0.03 - 10P(LS)] / 0.8
P(LS) / 0.2 = 0.0375 - 12.5P(LS)
P(LS) = 0.0075 - 2.5P(LS)
3.5P(LS) = 0.0075
P(LS) = 0.0021
@marsh basalt Has your question been resolved?
Why Is P(LS) not just multiplication
P(AB) is usually not P(A)P(B)
If P(AB) = P(A)P(B)
Then we say that A and B are independent events
In a sense, one occurs without influencing the other
Clearly, S influences L, so they are not independent.
@marsh basalt Has your question been resolved?
Can you do it like ```P(L) = (P(S) * P(L | S)) + (P(~S) * P(L | ~S))
@marsh basalt Has your question been resolved?
@marsh basalt Has your question been resolved?
You have the answer now, right?
P(L|S) = P(LS)/P(S)
Yeah, you should be able to do it that way too. Nice catch
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.


