#help-38
1 messages · Page 233 of 1
anyway, your $u$ in this case is $x+y$
Oliver
oooh
$\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}$ - do you know how to solve this? and of course the asnwer for $y$ is the same
Oliver
it doesn't like none of the above
It isn't none of the above
You can just plug in to here, if you understand what each component in the product on RHS means
Yes
what does that mean anyways
like df/d(x+y)?
Right. so you have that formula which is the multiariable chain rule. Do you know $\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}$
Oliver
If I told you $u=x+y$
not really clear
Oliver
terrible notation for this kind of stuff
I disagree, this question is completely clear
This is a standard multivariable calculus question
I never had this kind of notation
I had the D notation
but alright now it's solved so
I cannot help you if you don't answer these questions
If you don't understand that is fine, if you do then I can proceed to the rest
well we pretty much take the derivative of f(x+y) with respect to (x+y), and then use the chain rule
You don't need to
The point of this is that this result works for any arbitrary function
I guess
d/dx f(u) is f'(u) or du/dx?
I feel like there is a misunderstanding
Where's this coming from
$\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial u} \cdot \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}$
Oliver
when $z=f(u)$
Oliver
So plug in $u=x+y$ and see if you can solve that, and if not let me know what you cannot do
Oliver
smeagol
or
No
This formula is for the derivative of z, not f
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial u} = f'(u)$
Oliver
why are we using partials on a single variable function
What is "f" and "u" that yall are talking about
there is a function f , which took the input x+y , its not a representation of a multivariable function
there is a function f(x,y) such that it is f(x+y)
something like this
Yeah you are correct with dz/dx, it'll be f'(x+y) (1+0) which is just f'(x+y)
Same with dz/dy
Yeah
Your notation should have $\partial$ instead of $d$ though
Executor (ask on server b4 DM)
But otherwise is fine
yw
.close
Closed by @balmy hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand the bottom part.. why consider A,C,B,D?
also isnt |CA|/|CB| = |DA|/|DB| the harmonic thingy for ABCD ? or am i dumb and theyre equal
@limpid belfry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
isnt that what its saing?
saying*
it says ACBD which is a different ordering so i dont get it
they are taking the magnitude
so AC is smae as CA
then if you just cross multiply u get the particular quad they want
they just used ACBD to look prettier on the ratios
ehh
wdymm
they said A,C,B,D is used often in olyms for some reason
pleh
i still dont get it ;-;
@limpid belfry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
and AB = BC
Closed by @sharp stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What exactly does this look like? Can someone walk me through an example?
This is their example which I still can't visualize
@scenic cloak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hiii! Uh does anyone here do know how to do microeconomics? I have a question
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
.close
Closed by @quaint whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.what is your question about it?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this ?
i tried to do it like
i know for the whole thing to be 0 the separate terms should be 0
so i tried to do ksinxcosx - 1 = 0
so ksinxcosx = 1
i dont know what to do after
Why only ksinxcosx - 1 = 0?
What made you think that (sinx + cosx)^2 is always 0 for all x?
srry
Np
misread it lol
for the whole thing to be 0 i thought maybe its like 0 + 0 = 0 so the separate terms (cosx...)^2 = 0 qnd ksinxcosx-1 = 0
But (sinx + cosx)^2 is not 0 for all x though
can u explain 😅
how did u solve after that to get -2
expandit
sin^2x + cos^2x +2sinxcosx
thats 1 +2sinxcosx
1 geets canclled in that eq
and only
2sinxcox + ksinxcosx = 0 is left
taking it to that side
-2sinxcosx = ksinxcosx
assuming only principle values ig
ohh ok i got it
but i didn't get the 0 part
cancl sinx and cosx
this
like
(sinx + cosx)^2 = 0
Sinx + Cosx = 0
Sinx = -Cosx
Which is satisfied only when x is of the form (2n+3)pi/4
ur saying 1 + 2sinxcosx = 0
that makes sin2x = -1
which is only true for some values
not for all x
Closed by @modest rain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hape it helps byee
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone remind me of the rules of integration? I haven’t done it in a long time and I kinda forgot how to integrate from Product rule & quotient rule
Tysm
Oh… I don’t think I’ve heard of that method yet
It is useful
You can go on youtube
And search "integration DI method", i think it will pop up
Closed by @humble hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi did i draw the triangle correct as in the secondary triangle
i used 5.5sin30 to find height which was 2.75 so h<b<c, so I think there is ambigious case but Im not sure if this is drawn correct
i dont think so
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
you have your own channel, wait there
Ok
@misty cosmos this is what your diagram would have looked like
copying the numbers from yours
ohhh
wait does that mean the triangle is the same except for the fact that there iis an isosceles iinside it?
@trim lichen
that's
a weird way of putting it i think
the point is that the data you've got cannot distinguish between triangles ABC and ABC'
hence the ambiguity in the ambiguous case
wait in what way cannot it not be dinstinguishable
can you say that again but without the accidental double negative
oh mb wait do u mean iin terms of the angle like sin(66.4) and sin(133.6)?
like that they are both positive
@trim lichen
or sin(theta) and sin(180-theta)?
you're kind of overthinking it
😭
alr then we just subtract 180 bc its flat so 180-66.4 to form our second triangle
hey can u check if drew it right this time
MS Paint has line and text tools jsyk
but yes this looks ok assuming the sine law was applied correctly
it's .close
.close
Closed by @misty cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i simplify the bottom part?
${(a-b)(a+b) = a^2 - b^2}$
k
root(1-x^2)?
hmm
,w simplift 1/(1-sqrt{1-x}) + 1/(1+\sqrt{1+x})
please bear with me, are there any steps in questions with irrational numbers?
i dont really understand the results of these
not yet
[ \frac{1}{1-\sqrt{1-x}} = \frac{1}{1-\sqrt{1-x}}\cdot \frac{1+\sqrt{1-x}}{1+\sqrt{1-x}} = \frac{1+\sqrt{1-x}}{1-1+x} = \frac{1+\sqrt{1-x}}{x}]
k
rationalising the first term
there should be a +2 at the top right? and how do you do something like (1-root(1-x))(1+root(1+x))
oh i see
you rationalize them individually
okay okay
that makes so much more sense
and since they have a common denominator you just add them tgt
is there anything u can factor out so that the top looks somewhat famaliar to the bottom
how did we remove the 2 up top?
man i am bad with irrational numbers like these
there will be two positive ones after we rationalize right?
yup
[ \frac{1}{1-\sqrt{1-x}} = \frac{1}{1+\sqrt{1+x}}\cdot \frac{1-\sqrt{1+x}}{1-\sqrt{1+x}} = \frac{1-\sqrt{1+x}}{1-1-x} = \frac{1-\sqrt{1+x}}{-x} = \frac{\sqrt{1+x} - 1}{x}]
k
[ \frac{\sqrt{1+x} - 1}{x}]
k
@short shore Has your question been resolved?
omg
is the answer 4?
,w {[sqrt((1-\sqrt(3)(2))) + sqrt((1+\sqrt(3)(2)))]/[sqrt(3)/2]}^2
i need to learn how to do that
yes
i can send pics
omg
ok wait
sorry i dont really know how to do digital stuff
i have it on paper
I think it should be 4/3
where did i go wrong
man
oops sorry it sent twice
In the 1st line you didn't distribute the negative in the rationalisation of the 2nd term
this is a bit more calculations than necessary
the final answer does come out to 4 though
$\frac{\sqrt{1 - x} + \sqrt{1 + x}}{x} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\sqrt{1 - x} + \sqrt{1 + x}}{x}\right)^2} = \sqrt{\frac{2 + 2\sqrt{1 - x^2}}{x^2}}$
Mqnic_
for positive x
thank God.
this question took longer than any of the other ones, i was wondering if there would be a shorcut
remember this method btw
for sure, thanks
Closed by @short shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've been training to solve this for the past few mins but I couldnt get it
There is a formula you can use, do you know that?
no
Open your own channel please
i am new to dicord just need some help from you guys
So, what kind of method have you been taught? Could you explain it to me?
for example I toke y=-2 and the other y in point m which is 4 so -2-4 then I got -6 then I added -6+-2 and i got -8 which is right but
when i tried the same thing on another point i didnt get the same answer
thats why i dont get it
can you guys help me
OPEN YOUR OWN CHANNEL
how can i open my own channel i need help not want to help someone
Go to help 8 or help 15 there is no one there
why
Closed by @hardy basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Well this seems like just a fluke to me, I am sorry
its alr
You can imagine it like this:
For example K(-1,0). Now, the reflection is about x-axis as y=-2, so there is gonna be no change in x coordinate
Now, imagine a mirror at y=-2, the distance of point from the mirror should be equal to the reflected point.
step one is to find the distance between y and -10 right?
then what
So, the distance(shortest, i.e the straing perpendicular line) of K(-1,0) from y=-2 is 2. Now you have to find the point with the same perpendicular distance but the direction is below y=-2, I.e y- coordinate<-2
So, the x coordinate remains same. As in K'(-1,y).
Now, you can see y should be -4 for it to fit the criteria
Or you can do this too:
The distance between them is 2. Double that, cuz mirror. So, 4 is the distance between the point and it's reflection. Now, we know x coordinate is gonna be same, So K(-1,0)--->K'(-1,0-4) . Minus, cuz we have to go 4 down
I like this method more personally
You can try this with N(2,1).
Distance from y=-2: 3
So, distance between point and reflection: 6
N(2,1)---->N'(2,1-6)---->N'(2,-5)
@hardy basalt
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to prove x e^x >= e^x -1 without derivative
$$0 \geq e^x - 1 - xe^x $$
$$1 \geq e^x \qty(1 - x)$$
Yea same thing
X>=-1e^-x
But how you prove it
@stoic garden
Yea
Hmm
Or you can divide e^x on both sides?
Why do you not want to use the derivative?
This is part of proving e^x derivative
And then X>= -1e^-x
So using derivative is circular reasoning
Same reason we cant use lhospjtal for e^x -1/x when x goes to 0
Are you using the limit definition of e then?
@rotund owl
We can't show anything about e if we don't define it
I wonder if you can say something like:
e^x (1 - x) = 1at, and only at,x = 0.e^x (1 - x)is continuous for allx E R.- On either side of
x = 0(by testing two randomx-values), we know thate^x (1 - x) < 0.
One of the definitions is that e^x is its own derivative, but clearly we aren't using that one
Can anyone listen to me
Wdym
I dont understand what after that
We sometimes define $e$ to be the number such that $\dv{x} e^x = e^x$.
@stoic garden
@wraith hinge you forgot a 1
Thats definition of e
(E^x)X>=(e^x) (1-e^-x) so then divide (e^x) it becomes x>=1-e^-x
But you said we don't know that e^x is its own derivative yet
Why do you need this inequality then?
Where did you find that?
What do you mean
To prove (e^x)' = e^x
It's xe^x >= e^x -1
Where e is what?
If you're using that definition then you don't need to prove that...
Im not though
The minus one in the exponent?
Why did you say you were then
Which definition of e are you using
Where did i say that
Right here
Does it say im using definition of e?
Still cant see where i say that
You need to define something to use it, and you said "Thats definition of e"
So what else could that imply if not that you're using that definition
What he sent i just said is a definition of e
Yes exactly mine is correct way
Dude
The -1 is now -1e^-x
Can you send it to chat gpt and ask it to send in latex
taebek is right, they didn't claim to use that definition, but telling which definition is being used would be nice
@bright quarry why are you spending your time reading messages and reacting with skull
because you’re goofy
So you wanna prove by first principle
Oh we got a smart guy here
word
So smart he spends his time reacting to messages of goofy people
exactly
By limit defintion of derivative
You're right! Let's correct that. The original inequality you meant is likely:
$(e^x)x \geq (e^x)(1 - e^{-x})$
Now it's correct — the right-hand side includes the term.
Dividing both sides by (which is always positive), we get:
$x \geq 1 - e^{-x}$
Let me know if you'd like this plotted or solved further!
Tf
mlk forgot the $
Ontos
dont use gpt ...
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
Daniel
Its to get it in latex form 🙏
I gave my own response he said I should translate it to latex using chatgpt
I see
Why did I get warned?
You didn't
See
And you prove that how
Prove about what
Divide both sides by e^x
Yea after that
No
I want to prove that the inequality stands close to 0
Like there is δ such that for xE(-δ,δ) the inequality is true
You need to do limits here?
Yea i need to prove the inequality fir squeeze theorem
Yeah so f(x + h) - f(x) / h as h tends to 0 right
Yea so e^x * lim h->0 (e^h -1)/h
The inner limit i can find with squeeze theorem if i can prove h<= e^h -1 <= he^h
Left side is easy second side idk how
Maybe Bernoulli inequality?
Idk what that is
Oh intresting yea
With x/1-x
Does proof of that go through e^x derivative at all
Or that limit
Bernillis one i meant
Bernoullis' inequality is proven via induction, if that's what you are asking
@rotund owl Has your question been resolved?
Ight then that works
Thanks
.close
Closed by @rotund owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You wanna find this without L hospital?
Nvm it’s done
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Helo
Its a mistake to use Lhospital
Helo
Can you help?
What subject is this
Ill pay by telling discussions thag you are very good guy
Its math
thanks
Is all graphs supposed to have consistant intervals?
No
But I'm guessing thats what is considered misleading
Idk what class this is
Its math grade 8
Do tou know what it means hy thousands?
Its not cents?
If it says thousands, it's thousands. Why would they have to be cents if there's "in thousands" written?
In the graphical representation it says 15$ and 20 cent
But on the top says in thousands
Meaning its that times 1000
So 15200$
Closed by @cobalt wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what am I doing wrong??💔💔
the answer is 3 but idk im not getting there
Closed by @glacial crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
Anyone know?
I got like 7 mins left
Timed hw
Anyone?
Pls
Or is it (3/5,inf)
Show your work
Up means derivative positive concave up means second derivative positive right
Closed by @tranquil jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(3/5,inf) or (-inf,3/5)?
(3/5 , inf)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay so planar straight line real number polygon, any plane, projected by lines to eyes intersecting view plane, does x and y on plane correspond to z off plane? Does this apply for any planes? Why or why not? Does this apply for more dimensional where only what is on view plane projected views? X E.
Should I just mathematically test myself?
Please ask if I am unclear. X E.
Alright, ping me if you want me to know. X E.
What do you mean by “x and y on plane correspond to z off plane”?
If you only have a point on the view plane, draw a line through that point to see all the possible positions the point originally could’ve been before being projected onto the view plane
I mean like triangle ABC unprojected corresponds to DEF projected, if mid point of AB and BC and mid point of that then mid point of DE and EF and mid point of that defines z, right?
That does not work for me, in many dimensional, just want z value for an x and y without going through every dimension. X E.
Sorry if I was just annoying. X E.
You want a version of z that goes in and out from the eyes and through the viewplane?
Something like that, calculate z from x and y. X E.
Based on values of z for vertices. If I am wrong, don't go deriving for me please. X E.
It’s impossible to calculate z only knowing its position on the screen
In what direction are x and y facing?
@dry vortex Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @dry vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I get from top line to bottom line
That’s just wrong unless there’s some other relationship with s
,w graph (1/s +2)/(1/s), s/(s+2)
Hm
Neat to see they're tangent, though
Closed by @cunning scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Super simple statement probably, but
A set U is open iff it is a neighborhood of itself.
The definitions I'm given is that a set is open if it is a member of the topology of some topological space X. Moreover, a neighborhood of a set U is a set A subset X such that U is contained in the interior of A. I have also been given the definition that the interior of a set A is the union of all open sets contained in A.
Now if a set is a neighborhood of itself, it must equal its interior, which is open. On the other hand, if U is open, then how do I proceed given the definitions I'm given?
@jagged wharf Has your question been resolved?
Then since U contains U and U is open, U is in the interior of U, so U is a neghbourhood of itself
Ah yes, now that you edited, it makes sense 🙂 Thank you!
.close
Closed by @jagged wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it possible to construct a trapezium ABCD with A and D are right angles such that AB = 25, BC = 20 and AC = 15?
Because I got this question that I have to construct this diagram
But can't seem to find a possible way to construct it
no
like
i can't seem to construct a trapezium with those lengths
but with a bit of help
i can now
.close
Closed by @nocturne mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the power series expansion of the function
[ f(x) = \frac{1}{x + 1} ]
centered at ( x_0 = 3 ).\\
My solution:
[f(x)=\frac{1}{x+1}=\frac{1}{1-(-x)}=\frac{1}{1-(-(x-3+3))}=\frac{1}{1-(-(x-3)-3)}]
so
[f(x)=\frac{1}{1-(-(x-3)-3)}=\sum^{+\infty}_{k=0}(-(x-3)-3)^k]
Slowaq
😕 yes I figured but I hoped that I could somehow justify my answer
nah
But thanks anyway
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@slate barn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slate barn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If A--> B then notA-->notB or notB-->notA ??
the latter.
Closed by @royal patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the green bit why do we devide by 60 we r going from secs to minutes should we time by 60?
if you have 60 seconds then you divide that by 60 to get 1 minute
minutes are longer, so as a rule of thumb, converting to minutes should give you a smaller number
Closed by @torpid lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got the answer which is 3 by using this formula
sorry tan inverse x + tan inverse y not -
now my doubt is why arent we taking the other cases for this formula where xy>1?
or does this formula include all solutions which may or may not satisfy and we just have to put it back in the original equation to check?
I feel like this has something to do with the fact that arctan's range is only defined on (-pi/2, pi/2)
oh ok but arctan can also be negative right
also can u answer this?
See, this is why I'm not 100% sure
My gut tells me its the same thing as like you would if you square both sides of x=3, you're "adding some solutions", but I could be completely bullshitting
ohh ok yeah that kind of makes sense...so we get extra solutions
should i wait for someone to confirm or should i close the channel?
Confirm
👍
I have a warning at the end of the message 💀
oh lmao
im asking cause every problem i see where u have to use tan inverse x + tan inverse y formula i start getting scared whether ill miss solutions
the formula only works if xy < 1 if that's the question
so you cant use it for xy > 1, because it just doesnt work anymore
nono like im asking why arent we considering all these 3 cases why only the first case
ohh
you could consider them
you'd find out that there are no sols
look at (2) e.g.
when xy > 1, arctan(x) + arctan(y) = pi + arctan(sth)
pi + arctan(sth) is gonna haver range (pi/2, 3pi/2)
which is completely outside of the range of a single arctan here
arctan(x) + arctan(y) is gonna be > pi/2 for x, y > 0; xy > 1
and so it wont equal arctan of any number
ohh ok right and even for the 3rd case its the same
so it is only for this particular question that we arent considering all the cases and what i said here is wrong?
again, that can never equal arctan of anything
I feel like the other cases are kind of considered implicitly
the authors probably assumed that it's clear that the other 2 cases wont yield any solutions
so they didnt bother talking about them
but i didnt see the author solution so i cant say
oh so we can just ignore the other cases and check if our solutions work in the original equation
in this case, they dont yield any new solutions, so yeah
if you wanted to be absolutely sure, you'd have to consider all cases
damn bro i cant afford to do that in an exam
unless its necessary
It's not like you have to do the algebra
you just have to realize this
and this
if arctan(x) + arctan(y) > pi/2, then surely it cant equal arctan of any number
Closed by @lunar stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so for this to happen,
x^2+4x+a^2 - a >=0 right
so discriminant has to be less than 0
so a^2-a-4>=0
now the question ive been asked is :
"sum of all real values of a for which f(x) is onto is"
im not able to understand how they got D=0?
f : R --> [0,p/2]
is that π/2?
yes
but arccot never takes 0 as a value, how can it be onto?
So their answer is (D)?
yes its D
sorry
a^2-a-4>=0 but this is the inequality we are getting right? cause disciminant <=0?
Thing is, we don't just want its values to be ≥ 0, we want it to be surjective onto [0,∞)
in order to get arccot to reach all values in (0,π/2], what's inside has to reach all values in [0, ∞)
yes
thats the first condition i applied
so you want that polynomial to be surjective onto [0,∞), not just positive
OH
if Δ < 0, the polynomial is strictly positive
i kind of see what ur getting at
so for that to be onto the polynomial must be onto as well
onto [0,∞) specifically
yes
“onto” is kinda meaningless in the void
but how do we ensure that?
2nd degree polynomials are just parabolas
you want a parabola to reach all heights from 0 onward and those only
so it touches 0 only once
so Δ = 0
huh i didnt get that
oh
wait nvm i got it
okay got it thanks a lot bro
.close
Closed by @lunar stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
where can i get help regarding jacobians and multivariable calc?
one second i need to process
@gentle crag so the explanation i have is:
it must only have one x value so that the other x value can be equal to the corresponding y value so that the function is onto and all y values are covered from [0,infinity)
is this correct?
I'm sorry but what (?)
💀
write down some subjects
<0
im not able to understand why 2 places where its 0 wont work
okay
this is not allowed because this parabola also takes negative values, but the original function is specifically defined to take value in (0,π/2]
and for y < 0 you get arccot(y) > π/2
for x ≥ 0 your polynomial still takes negative values
but still, the domain of the function is the whole ℝ, if you change the domain you're changing the exercise
okay
continue with this pls
this is a parabola with Δ < 0, and would correspond to some of your proposed values of α
is this parabola onto [0,∞)?
so that it touches x axis
yeah
but it can't go lower then the x-axis, because negative values are not allowed
Closed by @lunar stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how my teachers getting p(x) in laymans terms
i dont get these questions
@vocal epoch Has your question been resolved?
What part didn't you understand?
x is the amount of iPhones needed and it depends on n (we get it directly from the question)
x = 200 + 20n, since at the beginning it says that a store has been selling 200 pieces
and it increses by 20 with each $10 rabate, hence 20n
p(x) is already explained, it's the price (i.e. how much money a store makes)
and p(x) = 350-10n, because each piece has been selling for $350
and taking n $10 rabates into account we have to subtract it (because rabate means a store earn $10 less for each piece)
After this, your teacher solved the 1st equation for n and then put it into p(x)
That's all
@vocal epoch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vocal epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when we want the domain of quadratic inequality, we get their roots, put them on the number line, and say that hte domain is either the inbetween or whats on the two sides of teh roots. when did we do that and when did we do that
You mean, how do we know if we're supposed to take that part "between" and when the other part?
yes
Start from + on the rightmost side
i dont quite understand?
R1 and R2 are the two roots of the quadratic, which are distinct and real
So the quadratic is positive for any value of x greater than R2
and negative for any value of x between R1 and R2
While it is positive for any value of x lesser than R1 as well
At R1, R2 it is zero since they are roots
Closed by @torn shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdGdFT2DHp0 Here's a tutorial incase you need it
🚀✍️ Download Chapter-wise Session Notes, FREE DPPs & Chapter Test PDFs Now⬇️
✅ JEE Class 11 AIM Batch: https://bit.ly/3CsL0CX
✅ JEE Class 12 Excel Batch: https://bit.ly/3VlSxfz
✅ JEE Ranker's Batch: https://bit.ly/3EDhj4R Hello JEE Aspirants,
➡️Here is the link to join Webinar:- https://byju.me/JEEMap
✍️ GB Sir and ...
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so basically, I solved the question but idk if it's the correct approach or not,
there are a total of 4200 aliens and a total of 2022 planets,
total number of path = 4200!
we have defined,
total number of safe path ~ the number of trailing zeros of the binary counterpart of total number of path
i.e. total number of safe path = total number of zero's in binary equivalent of 4200!
we know,
for any number N to have k trailing zeros, N/2^k must be an integer
using this,
we define, total number of safe path = 2022!/2^k, where k belongs to N and is the maximum value such that 2022!/2^k belongs to Z
we have,
number of safe path = 2022!/2^k
it can be simplified as the gif(2022/2) + gif(1011/2)..........
which is equal to 2014
i.e number of safe path = 2014
since the number of aliens = 4200
number of path repeated = least integerfunction(4200/2014) = 3
Hence it has been proved that there exist atleast 3 aliens that took the same path.
@gray kiln Has your question been resolved?
@gray kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Claim
18?
Ye
For the numerator: you can write the second term as sin((A-C)-C), now expand this with the formula for sin(x-y)
Then simplify the numerator
Then do the same for denominator
Can't i do something in my done solution
There must be, but it will just become larger and larger
Ok then what to do
This
I don't know anything about sin((a-b)-c)
Consider (a-b) as an angle and c as the other angle
Use sin(x-y) = sinxcosy-cosxsiny, where x = (a-b) and y = c
Yes
yes
Numerator: $2\sin{(A-C)}\cos{C} - \sin{((A-C)-C)} = 2\sin{(A-C)}\cos{C} - (\sin{(A-C)}\cos{C} - \cos{(A-C)}\sin{C}))$
Like this for numerator
,rotate
Is it correct??
Can i seprate 2c in both other equations?
So it can become x-c and b-c
So what to do?
For the sin(A-2C) use this method
Which?
@queen dew
Like this see
The second term in the numerator is sin(A-2C) which can be written as sin((A-C)-C)
Ok then bye 1 min left
And similarly for the second term of denominator
sin(B-2C) = sin((B-C)-C)
Ol
The second term
@hallow fox Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
It's a periodic function
Yeah
Basically, it performs inf many cycles for x tending to inf
So average it out to 2/pi
Do I need to apply the L'h rule since both the numerator and denominator are infinitely large?
You can but how would you find derivative of |sinx|
the symbol is x or pi?
X
why'd you need that? You can differentiate the whole integral
Really? How would you differentiate |sint|
Oh wait
Mb
Mb
Im dumb
No but wait
Yeah no I'm stupid
@fresh pendant Ignore everything i said and use LH
oh the limit of the quotient of derivatives is DNE
that means we cant use lhop
i guess we will have to integrate then
@fresh pendant Has your question been resolved?
Try substituting u=t/x?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do 5129-3330
subtract
I have my own way of doing it and I’m not sure when it is going to trip me over
what is your way
Is it a mental math question
3330 + 670 + 1129=5,129
What’s your thoughts if you were asked to do mental math on this
So the result is 1799
I have been doing this like all the time
I’m not sure if it is a good habit
Especially when I’m doing test, this might kill me
It is quite fast
Yes, I need to weigh the pros and cons
The downside is when I get nervous, all of this stuff might just fk me up
Have you done something like mental abacus
No
I highly recommend doing it
The learning curve is steep
But I know people who are really fast at arithmetic
@blazing geode Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @blazing geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i cant figure this out.
Tom gives Mike 2 5 dollar bills.
Mike wants to buy a vape for himself, which costs 15 dollars
He takes 10 out of the atm, and pays using one of the 5 dollars bills from Tom
The other 5 dollars he accidentaly lost, but he wants to pay Mike back
He takes another 10 dollars from the atm to pay Tom back
Mike only lost 20 dollars in total from his own money, how?
Where is the other 5 dollars? how does Tom get 10 dollars back and Mike only loses 5?
I have tried to write this down and visualise it but every time it doesnt make sense
wait
The other $5 he accidentally lost, but he wants to pay Mike back
sorry, who wants to pay back whom?
Mike wants to give Tom his money back
He lost one of the bills its gone forever
Dropped it somewhere
do you have a picture of the original statement just so we are sure there is no deliberate word twisting
Its a real life thing that ahppened to me lol
mike's financial losses are:
- $15 paid on the vape
- $5 lost
- $10 paid back to tom
while his gains are: - $10 borrowed from tom
-30+10 = -20
i do not understand your question
the payback and the loss-into-nothing are separate expenses
the money he owed was 10, no? how did he only pay back 5 from his own pocket
mike has 10 from tom
mike takes 10 from atm so now he has 20
mike spends 10 from his money --
5 from tom
now tom has only 5 and wants to pay tom back 10
mike loses the 5
so mike takes out a ten
gives to tom
Mike spent another 10 ----
20 in total
it is right
the thing is in the mike paid everyone he owes no one anything
What did he pay 15 for the vape and lost a 5

