#help-38
1 messages · Page 221 of 1
This is an open cover of $\mathbb{R}$
Cycadellic
Can you give me a finite subset of this cover
$$…,(0,2),(1,3),(2,4),…$$
That still covers $\mathbb{R}$?
no
Cycadellic
i see
The only sets that are compact are closed and bounded
But we need a metric for boundedness to make sense
i think i get it
Why isnt an open set compact?
Lol
So, what does closedness have to do with every open cover having a finite subcover
(0,1)
(0,1) is the set we want to determine if it is compact?
Are you familiar with the archimedean property?
Think about 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, …
converges to 0
Make my open covers around it
You cant give me a finite subcover
Has to exist and cover (0,1) by archimedean prop
{(1/2,2),(-1,1)}
A subset of the cover
You cant
🤯
Once you name like 1/n, ill just say you didnt cover 1/(n+1)
And thats arch prop at the work
oh damn
So, no openness, and it must be bounded
got it
open balls?
Thats good
Closed by @warm trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
my teacher showed this weird thing
$X_{n+2} = X_{n+1} - 2X_n \
X_{n+2} - X_{n+1} + 2X_n = 0 \
E^2(X_n) - E(X_n) + 2(X_n) = 0 \
(\lambda^2 - \lambda + 2)(X_n) = 0 \$
Nyxzore
This is a discrete first order homogeneous difference equation
where E is the E operator/ shift operator
$E(X_n) = X_{n+1}$
Nyxzore
now the context has scared people away 😭
bro ngl
once my teacher said smthing like this
and i never understood
i get it that u mean d(x n+1)/d(x n) = E or smting like dat
until the third line you should be fine, yes?
the fourth line is a general trick for linear recurrences like this
It's the lamba nonsense that's weird for me yeah
you assume that X_(n+1) = lambda * X_n
that enables you to find particularly simple solutions X_n
Why?
it then turns out that the actual solutions will be linear combinations of those simple solutions
Where does this assumption come from
someone did it at some point and saw that it worked
💀
its a classic example of first assuming a simpler case
then solving that
and then using it to solve the harder original problem
@umbral onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @umbral onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone's got any idea how to solve this problem (its economics but I can't quite figure out how to get around the math)
@soft grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need some help on the following problem , let $M_3(\mathbb{R})$ be the space of all $3\times3$ real matrices , let $F$ be a subspace of $M_3(\mathbb{R})$ such that $$F = \left{\begin{bmatrix} a & b & 0 \ 0 & a & b \ b & 0 & 2a \end{bmatrix} | a,b \in \mathbb{R} \right}$$ , note that $A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 2 \end{bmatrix}$ and $B = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$ form a basis of $F$ , find another subspace $K$ such that $F \oplus K = M_3(\matbb{R})$
Sneferu
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
i have just an idea but it just seemed weird that i don't think it's the "intended solution"
well share it anyway
the thing we have the canonical basis of $M_3(\mathbb{R})$ and since ${A,B}$ is linearly independent $\dim(F) = 2$ and $\dim(F) + \dim(K) = \dim(M_3(\mathbb{R})) \implies \dim(K) = 9-2 = 7$i thought of using that basis completeness theorem and pick matrices from the canonical basis and add them to the set ${A,B}$ and check whether they are linearly independent or not until i have my 7 matrices and pray that their span will give me $K$
Sneferu
ok yeah dim(K) = 7 is correct
and actually you can pluck matrices from the canonical basis
thats a perfectly fine solution
is there some other solution you have in mind that doesn't rely on trial and error with the canonical basis ?
i thought it wasn't really the intended solution since the test was like 1 hour and i'm sure this takes some time to check
@tough wyvern Has your question been resolved?
@trim lichen
ehh
i mean ok like
heres the idea
because the matrices A and B only have 3 nonzero entries each
you can add the canonical-basis matrices with their 1's not overlapping with either A or B, for free
and then for each set of canonical-basis matrices of which A and B themselves are linear combination, you take all but one
@tough wyvern Has your question been resolved?
thank you so much
Closed by @tough wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello so I have been trying my best to do mixed numbers but cannot ever understand how it works. I always get thrown off with the second part with the subtracting or adding portion.
answer= answer given from site
this is one of the problems Im having issues with (subtracting)
I get stuck after attemping to subtract/add them.
There is also usually a last part that has an answer like this:
1 1/2 or 1/4/5 that 1 always in front always throws me off for I dont understand how it always gets there.
1/2 + 5/8 = 1/2 + 6/8
how did the 5/8 become 6/8 exactly...? and then it looks like you did the "add top and add bottom" thing, which is a common ish mistake
Which is the workings for this question?
based on the work you've shared i don't think mixed numbers are what's troubling you
i think it's fractions in general that you're struggling with
also yeah none of these like three different exercises look like they have anything to do w/ the problem you shared...
So we are asked how many more tablespoons of mustard we need than chopped onions
you mixed a lot of words up in that
@calm thunder hey are you still here
@calm thunder Has your question been resolved?
@calm thunder
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sorry
This video tutorial shows you how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide fractions. It shows you how to convert between improper fractions, mixed numbers, decimals and even percents.
Fractions - Basic Introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TklZi6MeJ4
Adding Fractions - Unlike Denominators:
https://www.yout...
this is very helpful thanks
geniuine
ok
I have trouble with fractions and it seems its gonna be a while to study to ackonowledge
Look at khan academy for additional practice too!
i mean, yeah, shit takes time to get used to/ comfortable with
@calm thunder Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @calm thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the question is about physics but my problem is math
so i need find Vo
and Vo need to be 3 m/s
i tried use cos
but idk
what to do
if I find Vo the remainder is formula
@echo rose Has your question been resolved?
Yes
but in this case Vo = 25/3
Wait when dealing with vectors
Vo = cos(theta) * 5
yes
so, cos theta = Vo/5
5 is the hypotenuse
dont worry
So yeah cos theta= Vo/5
cos theta top and cos theta bot are equal
Yeah
But here we want to decompose the 5 into its 2 components so it should be the hypotenuse
how I do this?
ohhh
That are perpendicular
So I can move the vectors to be in this shape
So you would be able to see that 5m/s is the hypotenuse vector
Understandable?
Yeah but you understand why right?
Np
Closed by @echo rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\frac{1}{1-x} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n$\
$f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1}$\
$f'(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n x^{2n}$\
$f'(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-x^2)^n$\
$f'(x) = \frac{1}{1+x^2}$\\
$f(x) = Arctan(x)$\
$Arctan(x) = x - \frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^5}{5} - \frac{x^7}{7} + ...$\\
$\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 - \frac13 + \frac15 - \frac17 + ...$\\
$\pi = 4 - \frac43 + \frac45 - \frac47 + ...$
Oğuzhan
Is this a valid way of showing this?
i cant tell what you are aiming to show, but i dont see something particularly wrong so far
Our professor proved it this way today, and I've seen it being proven in much more complex ways, is it really just this simple?
The famous, simple but slow, approximation of pi
i see, well depends on whats simple for anyone, but yea you can do the things he did
if you are done you can close
Closed by @scenic delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the answers i filled in for e and f are wrong
but anyways, can someone explain all the parts starting from c
@turbid gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\begin{align*}
3g + f + 0c &= -4 \
0g - 2f + c &= -1 \
6g + 0f + c &= -9
\end{align*}
Ytterbium
My calculator shows math error when I try to solve these three
Are they unsolvable
try finding if there is a free variable
A free variable
I think I get what you're saying
But it's not working
The variables cancel out
take twice the first equation and add it with the second
you will notice a linear combination
which implies...?
I get $-2f+c=-1$
Ytterbium
Closed by @obtuse lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I would like someone to walk me through this
I have to use green's here btw
so I have $\iint_{D} div(F) \cdot s = \int_{C} F \cdot r$
What a wonderful world !
have to figure out the boundary
u remember what i said about boundaries
if u lived in that 2d plane in the first octant, where would the "end of the world" be
at the x,y and z axes
uh no
wait
but maybe u have the right idea but just stated it wrong
here it would be a triangle on the xy plane
also wrong
2x+y=2, x=0, y=0 would be the boundary
unfortunately incorrect
why
say u have a triangle
any triangle
including the inside
what are the boundaries of said triangle
the edges
right
so what are the edges of the triangular section of that plane?
0≤x≤1;0≤y≤2
this right
no
well maybe idk i didnt do all the math but the point i was trying to make is that the boundaries are the line segments at the xy yz xz planes
cuz it says first octant
I'm still not sure what the boundary would be
The best I can say is0≤x≤1;0≤y≤2;0≤z≤1
maybe itd help to draw it out
the triangle ur working with looks like this
its a portion of a plane
that exists in the 1st octant
then the boundary are these 3 lines
findable by substituting x = 0 for the line in the yz plane, y = 0 for the one in the xz plane, and z = 0 for the one in the xy plane
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys.
Here is an integral that I'm currently trying.
The answer involves Hypergeometric Function.
As you can see here.
Problem is, I'm stuck and I don't know how to proceed to get the 1/8 and 9/8
@bronze tinsel Has your question been resolved?
something something if you have (1/8)_n and (9/8)_n then they more or less cancel each other out. somewhere along those lines is probably the solution
working backwards probably helps
My goal is not to prove.
It's to solve.
Although this might help.
find the ratio between successive terms, then make it look like the definition
What do you mean by successive term?
I think my main problem lies on 1/(8n+1)
$\frac{\text{n+1th term}}{\text{nth term}}$
Sepdron
Hmm...
Let me see...
Now.
I got
nice!
oh no, do the general term
not just for a specific n
2KGod
close, what about the $\frac{\qty(\frac12)_n}{n!}$?
Sepdron
btw, you don't need the \text if the inside is math
I straight away copy your stuff.
What do I have to do with that??
It's fixed.
This is what the form that I want it to be.
According to here, I have the b and z.
Now I need a and c.
aah, you have that definition
I was following wolfram's
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
A generalized hypergeometric function pF_q(a_1,...,a_p;b_1,...,b_q;x) is a function which can be defined in the form of a hypergeometric series, i.e., a series for which the ratio of successive terms can be written (c(k+1))/(c_k)=(P(k))/(Q(k))=((k+a_1)(k+a_2)...(k+a_p))/((k+b_1)(k+b_2)...(k+b_q)(k+1))x. (1) (The factor of k+1 in the denomi...
This is generalized one.
Should have mentioned this earlier...
yeah, so from that, for $2F_1$ you have
$$\frac{c{n+1}}{c_n} = \frac{(k+a_1)(k+a_2)}{(k+b_1)(k+1)}$$
Sepdron
And....
ig the trick is that you can factor an 8 from the numerator and denominator of that
Hmm....
@bronze tinsel Has your question been resolved?
@bronze tinsel Has your question been resolved?
@bronze tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i preform the step for whole number z:
z^2 mod 5 = (z mod 5)*(z mod 5)
and what justification do i use?
usually, you have something like
z^2 = ___ (mod 5)
where you have something in place of ___
z^2 mod 5 is a bit cursed
but no that isn't correct: take z=4
yes
I know some programming courses like to treat mod as an operator, this is non-standard though
i think this would work if you did
z^2 mod 5 = (z mod 5)*(z mod 5) mod 5
Given $r \equiv z \mod 5$ (where $0 \le r < 5$) means there exists some integer $k$ such that $z = 5k + r$, we have
$$z^2 = (5k + r)^2 = (25k + 5r)k + r^2 \equiv r^2 \mod 5$$
and $z = 5k + r \equiv r \mod 5$
Shuba
@fair forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have you done? its be helpful to sketch a graph
@stark pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
i dont think a rough graph will be helpful
just integrate it....
simplify..
1- 5^(-10)/ log 5
alr can you answer the qs now?
can you?😭
well you can bound the function by step functions
a graph helps visualize what the steps functions are
the "decreasing function" property is very important
its a gp with ratio less then 1
yes its decreasing
yeah we can worry abt the ratio later, but the main problem is: how to trasform the integral (which is hard to compute since we dont have any info) to something (perferrably sum) relating to f(0),..., f(10)?
again a step function bound is v helpful
bruh 1=f(0), so 0<integral<f(0)<2f(0)
i mean this works but it doesn't quite help the op understand the concept 
hmmm well yeah but quicker methods are also useful in tests and stuff
ohhh i seee 🤩
step function like the graph of [x]
but why not a continuous function
to something (perferrably sum) relating
yes understood
hint because when we are working with a step function, lets say g(x) is equal to f(0) on the interval [0,1], then $\int_0^1 g(x) \ dx=f(0)$, can you see why?
qwertytrewq
furthermore $g(x)\geq f(x)$ on the interval $[0,1]$ (which is the crucial step, can you justify this?
qwertytrewq
g(x) is a step function here?
sure, but lets say one of the "steps" is on the interval [0,1] and g(x). Just to be clear a step function just means that the function is defined as being constant on intervals (you divide the domain into intervals, and on each interval the function is constant)
yes got it
how do apply this concept in the qs above
here is an example
i believe he means smtn like this
like that but a little bit more general
if the red line is the function f, then you can see that the constant function (blue line) bounds f from aboce
yes yes
make sence
okayyy
we can improve the bound by dividing into two parts
the blue line still bounds the red line
like this right?
(we need the decreasing condition here for the bounding reason)
yeah, thats when we refine the bound into 10 parts
can you figure out the function for the bound?
btw it can go below the x axis too right?
yeah
as long as the function is constant on the intervals its fine
its simply partitioning the domain, and then defining the function on each partition
visually it looks like steps
of different sizes and heights
okayyyyy
now this has to do smthing with the ratio?
1/5
decreasing
not yet, but lets work through it
can you figure out the function for upper bound here?
is the partition all the integers?
not necessarily integers, for example i can partition [0,3] into [0,1.6) and [1.6,3]
no for this particular qs... cuz it says the f(0), f 1 , f2.... f10 all are in gp, i want to use this
if I divide [0,10] into [0,5),[5,10], and define g(x)=f(0) on [0,5), and g(x)=f(5) on [5,10], do you see how g would represent the blue line?
yeah yeah we are getting there, but ill need to give you sole context (which is done for arbitrary functions)
an intuitive understanding would help

yess i think i am getting the full view

AHHHH I SEEE
YEAAHH
This gives us a bound: $$\int_{0}^{10}f(x) \ dx\leq \int _0^{10} g(x) \ dx=5f(0)+5f(10)$$
qwertytrewq
okay okayy
i got this okay
ok now try partitioning the interva [0,10] into [0,1),[1,2),...,[9,10]
and defining a step function there
okay yeah i see how it will be
we put the the first valuve of domain as the upper bound
its fine to define it one interval by one interval
u mean g(x)=f(0) on [0,1), etc?
yes
yeah precisely! can you now give an upper bound for $\int_0^{10} f(x) \ dx$ using your function?
qwertytrewq
didnt we just did that?😭
tbh I didn't know about this method , its pretty cool
maybe this diagram would help you answer what he's asking
(sorry for the terrible handwriting)
yes i get thatt now how do i proceed?
do you know what upper bound means?
yes
its the ones with straight black lines ablove the green line
like if you can calculate the area under the graph for this functions
its an upper bound on the area of f(x)
does that make sense?
yeah yeah
whats the area of the first rectangle?
but doent we get extra area?
thats the point of an upper bound to give us an inequality on the area of f(x) so we can use it to solve the problem
hmmmm okayy
so now i find all the areas of rectangle
basically upper bound of the area must have more area than f(x) hence the name 'upper'
and then it will be more then $$\int_{0}^{10}f(x)$$
Eclipse
alright
and it will be less then?
the lower bound, but we don't need one right now, just solve this first
if need arises we will check
did you get the upper bound?
waittt
no leave it as it is
i cant get how to put the partitions
whats the width of each partition
1
it starts at f(0)
okayyy
do you know what sum you can apply here
f(0)/1-1/5
there isnt inf terms
thats the sum of all the height
10
im pretty sure there are 10 terms
0 to 10?
f(0),f(1),,,f(9)
that would be integrating from 0 to 11
yea for the bound
it will stop at 9
to count till 10
right
so power will be 10
alr now you can writ this as 5/4 f(0)(1-5^-10)
which is lesser than 5/4f(0)
but integral<5/4 f(0)(1-5^-10)<5/4f(0)
makes sense?
now check the value of f(0), can it be negative?
okay so $$\int_{0}^{10}f(x)$$ is less then 5/4 f(0)
Eclipse
no, its cuz then the gp wouldn't be decreasing
that too
okay
great make sencee
alr so f(0)>0
yea yea
=>2f(0)>5/4f(0)
okayy
but insted of 2 u can write any integer greater then 2 as well
why u chose 2?
cuz its there in the options
cuz its more closer as well
yeah you should also check the lower limit
now we know the area must be more than 0 since f(0)>0 and the function is decreasing, so int>0
okayyyy
so the int must also be more than 0
well you should thank qwertytrewq
thats a nice way to slove
I didn't do much, it was him who introduced it
@placid radish thankssss
its a great way to approach this
np
really appricated!!
u helped me reach the ans, also thankss!! plus the short way too!!
alrighttt!!
or something close to that
yeah maybe
its a bit less than 1/4 f(0)
cuz we can really add to infinite anymore
for the lower bound
you consider these rectangles for the lower bound btw
2441406/9765625 f(0)
lmao nice
hmmmmmmmm
its the same method, just with a lower approximation instead
these type of "step function bounds" are sort of common when it comes to riemann integral, in fact it is used to define riemann integral 
we say riemann integral exists when the highest step function bound, and the lowest step function bound gets arbitrarily close when our partition is small.
@stark pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stark pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im not sure how to simplify this
C represents choose or combination or binomial coeff or wtever you call it
what does nCr mean?
by which I mean, what is the formula for it?
n!/(n-r)!r!
yep, maybe use that to simplify?
ok what now
i dont think it helps, besides the options are in terms of A10 B10 and C10, so maybe expanding it isnt a great idea
split it into two summations, take the constants outside
after that, hint: use nCr = nC(n-r)
@vagrant imp Has your question been resolved?
(1+x)^10 * (x+1)^10=(x+1)^20
and whenever the powers add up to 10, like say x and x^9, their coefficients will be the same since 10C1=10C9, thus we get sum of Ar^2=coeff of x^10 in (x+1)^20=B10
is that right?
but im not sure how to do sum ArBr
yes
do the same thing
oh so its C10
yup
Wow so ans is 0
yeah
wth uh is this wrong?
huh oh wait
oh shoot
left summation is only for 10 terms
so doesnt include all B
yeah but coeff of x^10 wont have stuff like coeffs of x^11 or x^20 from B
or maybe im understanding it wrong
oh bruh 0 is also not included
Thanks a lot for your help, really appreciate it!
np happy to help 
.close
Closed by @vagrant imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
trying to show this series converges to 3
not sure how to do so. is there a way to express Sn as a sequence so i can take the limit?
your S_N is incorrect bc you just take the first, second, third and then jump straight to the N'th term
yeah i know
yes there is, look up geometric progressions
i meant to add ...
this?
so 2r^n-1
what's r
yes but you need the formula for the sum of the first n terms.
1/3.
2/3^(n-1) = 2 * 1/3^(n-1) = 2 * (1/3)^(n-1)
where'd 2/3rds come from?
$\frac{2}{3^{n-1}} = 2 \cdot \frac{1^{n-1}}{3^{n-1}} = 2(\frac{1}{3})^{n-1}$
BuilderDolphin
Closed by @fluid bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey everyone, heres a question from Silverman's friendly intro to number theory
im having a difficult time with demonstrating the first part of the hint
i was thinking about using quadratic residues mod 3 but it doesnt seem to work well enough
@valid beacon Has your question been resolved?
Also try #elementary-number-theory
@valid beacon Has your question been resolved?
I think I might be able to help
First you can easily say that x will not be negative
Second by further analysing you can say that x has to be perfect square
i dont think x has to be a perfect square
No it has to be
i might have solved it now but that was one of the cases i checked
it seems that checking the cases of how squarefree x is seems to work
so either x is a square, x is not square but not squarefree, or x is squarefree
i mean even x being a square doesnt work
because you get smth like
$\begin{aligned}
x = A^2 \
\implies y^2 &= A^2(A^4 + z^4) \
\implies (\frac{y}{A})^2 &= Y^2 = A^4 + z^4
\end{aligned}$
which doesnt work bc thats a stronger statement of FLT at n = 4
hiidostuff
This is the equation that forms so x is either equal to
X^2 + Z^4
Or x is perfect square but
If all x,y,z are integers x has to be perfect square
i dont think it has to be equal
i mean consider smth like $x = a^2 b$ where b is squarefree
hiidostuff
then we just get an implication that b divides x^2 + z^4
rather than saying that x is forced to be equal to x^2 + z^4
But if that's the case then y ^2 will not be perfect square
Which it has to be as y is integer
then we get a^2 b^2 times smth else that could very well be square
Got it I forgot bout that possibility
luckily im pretty sure the "not squarefree but not square" case can be shown to be impossible due to descent
i didnt use the advice the book gave though
i still wonder what their idea was
@valid beacon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @valid beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the empty set a basis for a subspace with dimension 0?
yes
.close
Closed by @leaden nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any shortcut?
@lean kraken Has your question been resolved?
But how can I find A^3 by any short way?
Idk
Closed by @lean kraken
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
use characteristic Equation |A-(lambda)I| = 0
Got the ans. loll
I have solved out
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Part c
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Yea lol mb
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
shouldnt f-1(2) be 0
e^(-0) f(0)=2+int(0,0)sqrt(t^4+1)dt
=>f(0)=2+0=2
so f-1(2)=0
am i wrong or is this question wrong?
they've given the answer as|| B) 1/3||
.
oh bruh missed the dash
ugh
yeah i got 1/3
basically i took f(x) as y, found dx/dy, interchanged x and y, found values of x and y from the function, subtituted and solved
Closed by @vagrant imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where do you get x = 2 from?
@glad patio Has your question been resolved?
how are you finding the turning point x=2 when the function (by extension its turning points) are dependant on k?
@glad patio
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what part are u stuck at?
I just dont know how to do it
Do you know the quadratic formula?
Then apply it to the equation
This is the discriminant, yeah
b**^**2. you should use the symbol ^ to write exponents.
so I get 8 +/- square root of 120/ 4
so the answer would be 120
There you go 👍
thank you!!
Yw 🤗
.close
Closed by @hushed ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got area of R as 100/3
What is your question?
b)
Look at the second and third picture
can you show your work
you didn't find the area of the correct region
you've found the area between curve C and the x-axis, from x=0 to 2
i.e. the red part
yes, that works
@glad patio Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ahhhhhhhhhhh
I do not
I get tired about an hour of studying
But I'm supposed to solve 20 questions in a 100 minutes test
what should I do
Well the best suggestion is to simulate exam conditions a week before the exam
should I take a nap, I'm so tired rn
That isn't that bad
should I take a nap if I feel tired before exam
We have 75 questions in 180 mijs
really
.close
Closed by @blazing geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@pearl lark Has your question been resolved?
@pearl lark Has your question been resolved?
@pearl lark Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pearl lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\lim_{x\to\infty}x\left(\frac{\ln(x+1)}{x}\right)$
<rajel />
im trying to calculate that limit
$\lim_{x \to \infty} x \left( \frac{\ln(x) + \ln\left(1 + \frac{1}{x}\right)}{\ln(x)} \right)$
<rajel />
this is what i ended up wtih
i believe theirs a rule that says for any large value x , ln(1 + 1/x) = 1/x
and then i ended up with $\lim_{x \to \infty} x \left( \frac{\ln(x) + \frac{1}{x}}{\ln(x)} \right)$
<rajel />
hold up
doesnt this just simplify to ln(x+1)
or did you mess it up at some point writing down the original
i pasted the wrong equation
its ln(x) not x, sorry
$\lim_{x\to\infty}x\left(\frac{\ln(x+1)}{\ln(x)}\right)$
<rajel />
this is just infinity
no its not
ln (x + 1) ~ ln (x)
it should be 1
,w limit as x goes to infinity of xln(x + 1)/ln(x)
hold on a minute
^
are you SURE you arent messing up the original eq again

log(x+1)/log(x) -> 1
x*that -> ∞
yes im messing it again lmao
i need some rest lol
$\lim_{x\to\infty}x\ln(\frac{x+1}{x})$
better
<rajel />
put u= (x+1)/x
nope
Then solve for x
@trim lichen pasted the correct one ^
U know how to do that transition that I told you?
Ann
this is your limit
Why do that
LH incoming
hmm we dont work with log in my school
neither l'hopital
i'll try
what do you mean you don't work with log
ln
just pretend it is ln
i write it as log without a base out of habit
fuck no
tossing a thousand stones at you for that @frozen plover
no LH
just limit definition of the derivative @boreal shuttle
oh i see
U see what I am seeing ? Doesn’t it work also that way , way more simple
i think my way is simpler
you just recognize 1/x goes to 0
With that?
Yo also
Ln(x+1/x) = ln(x+1) - lnx
nice
Nvm that doesn’t get anywhere
.close
But what I told you in the beginning does
Closed by @boreal shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help understanding something
can somebody explain why this would be true
instead of using -1 please use a variable like a or c or something
What is the definition of limit?
the limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x)$ is completely independent of the value of $f(c)$
cloud
because it only quantifies the behavior of f near c
Wait, that's statement is not true. What if f(x) and g(x) is not continuous, like Weierstrass function
ohh
so even if it doesnt exist at that point
we can aproximate what it would be if it existed at that point?
whats that
im lockind in for my calc bc exam
then both limits don't exist
we can say that the limit is the point that the function "would" approach if it's continuous
that makes sense
The weierstrass function is continuous
That’s like the whole point
I’m not familiar
Well, or 0 for rational, 1 for irrational, dirichlet function
the implication here is that the limits are performed over the same set. it would only be untrue if you dropped that assumption
The indicator function of the rationals is the Dirichlet function
I could say, f(x) = g(x) at $(-1)^+$ and $(-1)^-$ so f(-1) = g(-1)
╰ 𝕃 𝕌 ℂ 𝕀 𝔽 𝔼 ℝ ╮
Let's add limit
I could say, $\lim f(x) = \lim g(x)$ at $(-1)^+$ and $(-1)^-$
so $$\lim_{x \to -1} f(x) = \lim_{x \to -1} g(x)$$
╰ 𝕃 𝕌 ℂ 𝕀 𝔽 𝔼 ℝ ╮
What I know is that if a function is continue to the right of a point and to its left, and left = right. that means it is continuous at that point.
@signal island Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @signal island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the blue is the correct answer. i don’t understand b)
i don’t really get what it means to be colinear, but it says it’s on the same line
wait
“but i don’t know how they’d be on the same line”
is it because if you multiply a scalar quantity by the vector, you only increase/decrease the magnitude, basically make it longer or shorter
u can ofc change its direction but we aren’t talking about that rn
so if u multiply by the scalar vector, you’ll be able to find ones that will be on the same line
is this correct?
but still what does it ACTUALLY mean to be collinear though
You’ve got it
Yeah collinear just means they're on the same line
Aka they're scaled versions of each other
2 vectors v and w are colinear if there exists some scalar k such that v = kw
@somber siren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What have you tried mate
Now what do we know about c and t that relates them?
the ratio 5:9
whats that slash sign
does that mean divide?
so c/t = 5/9
Thats what ratio means
No
oh