#help-38
1 messages · Page 220 of 1
PM = M - P = (-2,1,7)-(-5,7,4) = (3,-6,3)
L' : X = k(3,-6,3) + (-2,1,7)
k € R
in R^n n>3 you have to rely more on the abstract theory, intuition is harder to obtain
yep
L : X = k(-1,1,3) + (0,-1,1)
L' : X = k(3,-6,3) + (-2,1,7)
L' n L NON EMPTY INTERSECTION
P = (-5,7,4) € L'
L' perp L
(-5,7,4) = k(3,-6,3) + (-2,1,7)
i) -5 = 3k - 2
ii) 7 = -6k + 1
iii) 4 = 3k + 7
-3 = 3k ==> k = -1
it works
P is in L'
,w (3,-6,3).(-1,1,3)
L n L' :
-x = 3y -2
x - 1 = -6y + 1
3x + 1 = 3y + 7
-1 = -3y - 1
0 = 3y
(x,y) = (2,0)
ok it works I think
L : X = k(-1,1,3) + (0,-1,1)
L' : X = k(3,-6,3) + (-2,1,7)
L n L' = 2(-1,1,3) + (0,-1,1) = (-2,2-1,6+1) = (-2,1,7)
L n L' = 0(3,-6,3) + (-2,1,7) = (-2,1,7)
ok thanks, tricky exercise, ty both
@lime sphinx @leaden nacelle ❤️










.close
Closed by @urban copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
cool drawing mate
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- is interesting, we did an similar exercise in class, but already forgot how
oh I think I get it
,w (2,-1,-2)x(-2,2,-3)
,w sqrt{49k + 100k + 4k} = 1
The intersection of three planes is neccessarly a point or nothing
So what im proposing
Is get the equation of the plane with k
what?
the intersection of two planes is a line unless its the same plane, or unless its empty
I said three
I am just saying what I know from basic theory
never seen a triple intersection of planes before
so I wouldnt know
yes bro
because if the intersection of two planes is a line
and then the line is entirely contained in the other plane
Yep
You can get the definition of the intersection of the two planes you know
wdym
Like the intersection of pi1 and pi2
?
can you elaborate on what you mean?
You want the intersection of these 3 to be empty right ?
You can first get the intersection of the two first one
See that its a line (else if its empty, the exercice is done) and get the eqn of the line
ok
can we do it step by step
I kind of got lost
@clear cloud
we know the cartesian equation of the planes Pi1, Pi2
Yep
Set it as system of equation
And uh row reduce it (is that how its called ? With augmented matrix)
Pi1: x - 2y + z = 4
Pi2: -2x - 6y + 3z = -3
Pi1 n Pi2:
i) x - 2y + z = 4
ii) -2x - 6y + 3z = -3
,w rref {{1,-2,1,4},{-2,-6,3,-3}}
Gotta eat, bro
(x,y,z) = (3, (1/2).(z - 1), z)
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
Ok im back @urban copper
Ok and what about the directionnal vector of this
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{Show:} \
If $f,g$ are analytic functions on some open connected set $G$ such that
[ f'(z) = g'(z) \quad \forall z \in G ]
then $f(z)=g(z)+c$ for some constant $c\in\R$.
hi, i am a bit confused what to actually show, doesnt this simply follow
like isnt this immediate or am i missing something
Sort of
So far, as far as "analytic" is concerned, I think you would have been taught that you can safely say that "derivative = 0" implies "function is constant", right?
yea that makes sense
So - here we've actually got f' = g'
then f'(z)-g'(z) = 0, now we integrate both sides getting f(z)-g(z)=C
yeee
😭
Then you get to your conclusion
Closed by @limpid dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know how to proceed further I need some assistance
@olive totem Has your question been resolved?
You have a squared term which you're then square-rooting
...
Provided you can check which of 2root(6) - 5 and 5 - 2root(6) is positive...
Ah yeah wait let me write it
I'm sorry for the question but I'm not sure I know what I'm writing
Something like this?
Ah this doesn't make sense tho
there is a square and a square root
You have a number, you're squaring it and square-rooting it
They cancel out*
*(if the bit inside the squared brackets is negative, it becomes positive)
compare how sqrt(10^2) = 10
You're talking about √(2.√6-5)^2?
What exactly do u mean the square root disappears, the ^2 is inside of it, meaning a formula in the equation inside
Look here
$\sqrt{a^2} = (\sqrt{a})^2 = \abs{a}$
Evotushon
dear lord
(i'd be careful about that middle one, but the LHS and RHS are right yes)
Sorry for wasting your time lol
yeah speaking generally I wouldn't throw around absolute values left and right but for the last one it is needed
yh
Closing now
And in this case too, since 2root(6) < 5
Closed by @olive totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok a very easy way of dealing with this problem
a parabola has zeros -3 and 7, what does that imply?
yes exactly
however
it needs to pass through (5,36)
what changes can you make to y=(x-3)(x-7) so that is does not change the zeros and it also can STRETCH
also it should be +3
y=(x+3)(x-7)
-7
the zeros are -3 and 7
that means that those number + a number should equal to 0
yeah you would have a(x+3)(x-7)
how do i write it in standard form?
it only asked you to write it in y=a(x-s)(x-t)
@terse python Has your question been resolved?
@terse python Has your question been resolved?
@terse python Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yajat
Closed by @mystic veldt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no of solutions of summation n=1 to n=6 of x to the power n / n factorial = -1
,, \sum_{n=1}^{6}\frac{x^n}{n!}=-1 ?
Gregory
yes
Well, 0, I think?
cant it be a negative value
This is part of the taylor expansion of e^x
I'm not sure though
I mean some terms will ne gative
i was getting opp signs for x=1 and x=2
but the positive terms should overpower the negatives ones
,w \sum_{n=1}^{6}\frac{x^n}{n!}=-1 solve for x
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
this doesnt include the first term so it it negative for part of it but yeah not quite to -1
would there be any way to show this mathematically
take the derivative and find its minimum then evaluate it at the minimum to show that it is > -1
that of course requires finding 0 of 5th order polynomial so idk
or use the fact that this is part of taylor expansion of e^x, which is always positive
Closed by @upper zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is a tangent?
To a circle?
a straight line which has exactly one point in common with the circle
Ques. Prove that a tangent is perpendicular to the line joining the point of tangency to the centre of the circle.
do you want to present your own proof attempt or do you want to get an idea tossed your way?
Wait.
I am presenting my proof.
Proof:
Consider a circle with a tangent CD drawn, touching the circle at B. The centre of the circle is A.
The assumption is that the circle is only in contact with a single point of the tangent, which is B. Or that the whole circle lies above the tangent.
If AB is perpendicular to CD, we're done.
If not, then let AG be the perpendicular from the centre to the tangent. Since triangle ABG is a right triangle, AB > AG. Then there must lie a point F such that AF = AB = radius. This means the circle must pass through F. Clearly, F is a point which is on the other side of the tangent. Therefore, the circle has a point below the tangent, and this contradicts the assumption (a certainty). This contradiction will always arise if BG is non-zero (when GF is positive). So BG must be zero. We're done.
I will immediately go see the textbook proof after this.
My proof is based on the fact (which has just been proved by me) that the perpendicular from A to CD coincides with the point of tangency.
I forgot to ask the question.
Q. Is my proof correct?
<@&286206848099549185>
yeah looks correct ish
you have to use in one way or another that the hypotenuse of a right triangle is longer than either leg
though i will say that you will find people more willing to read your proof if you follow the convention of calling the center of a circle O
Okay.
ok
Thanks.
.close
Closed by @manic lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The numbers 1, 2, 3, . . . , 100 are written down on each of the cards A, B, and C. One
number is selected at random from each of the cards. Find the probability that the
numbers so selected can be the measures (in cm) of the three sides of a right-angled
triangle.
help pls
Use the pythagorean triplets
^^ those are the possible sides
is there a known way to find all pythagorean triplets in a given range
Why do I feel like I have seen this question somewhere
Im not sure if there’s any fast way to find them you’d probably just have to count
There was a way if I remember

u do realise
😭
diptava
Yep seen this question before
ik
ann might know
@maiden falcon Has your question been resolved?
A Pythagorean triple consists of three positive integers a, b, and c, such that a2 + b2 = c2. Such a triple is commonly written (a, b, c), a well-known example is (3, 4, 5). If (a, b, c) is a Pythagorean triple, then so is (ka, kb, kc) for any positive integer k. A triangle whose side lengths are a Pythagorean triple is a right triangle and call...
yes, you're looking for Euclid's formula
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(also you arent dividing by log 2 when you cancel them out, that is the wrong way to think about it)
you are raising them to the power of 2
aka applying the inverse
although it is correct to assert that:
[\log_2(3p-1)-2\log_2(q)=\log_2\left(\frac{3p-1}{q^2}\right),\quad p,q>0]
PajamaMamaLlama
hello chartbit!
Hiiiii 
so this?
This bit here is not quite correctly written 
You should have the right hand side of here 
The subsequent steps are sus, even allowing for that 
@glad patio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glad patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could anyone help me spot the error in my work? I keep getting -1.5. Here is the associated graph
@lusty pond Has your question been resolved?
@lusty pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you shouldn't write miles as m
m is for meters
maybe abbreviate miles as mi instead
right okay
just add units for 6b) , and yeah everything else looks good
@empty tulip Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @empty tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trying to integrate this using green;s theorm

What a wonderful world !
looks good
so I then have $\int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{2x} (2xy^3-x)dydx$
the lines in fubini's theorm enter from y=2x and exit from x=1
wait
oh

my bad
yea
What a wonderful world !
should be easy from here
yea, I'll leave it here, I'll just do one more green's theorm question
$\int_{-2}^{2} \int_{-\sqrt{4-x^2}}^{\sqrt{4-x^2}} -3(x^2+y^2) dy dx$
What a wonderful world !
this feels wrong
why?
look at the order
what
it looks right to me 🤔
What a wonderful world !
,w plot \sqrt{4-x^2}$
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
the lines?
wait, I'll send a picture
oh
got my mistake
makes sense now
nvm
thanks
this can be re-written as $\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \int_{0}^{2} -3r^3$
don't forget your jacobian
What a wonderful world !
.close
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone have anything on explaining annihilators ?
I have hw due about determining if an annihilator of a vector space is subspace of it but I can’t find anything on annihilatiors themselves
(did they not even give you the definition?
)
If so thats not very kind of them 
It’s in German but if you mean like the definition of the annihilatior yes, but I don’t know how to work on it
Jesus that’s unreadable hold on
Its good
And you're doing (i) basically?
Unterraum = subspace if im not too rusty
Well I need to do all of it
I think so!
I’ve been looking online for any kind of explanation but I can’t find anything that tells me where I’m even supposed to start :(
Well, how about you start with us 

What are the questions in your hw ?
Do you know how to show something in general is a subspace of a larger vector space? 
I just finished watching some lectures on it and made notes so I think so?
Hold on I’ll translate it
Awwww, that's cool, can you state it by any chance? (if not, then don't worry!)
Dw about this
Chartbit understand german aswell 
I don't, but I can figure out what they're asking 
“V is a K-Vector space (K meaning Body here) and U is a subspace of V. The ammount
[here the definition]
is de annihilatior of U. Show:
i.) U0 is a subspace of V*
(@limpid dawn may I pingeth you
)
Call the avengers
Oh indeed, it was already the hw, sorry
This looks like a special case of orthogonal vector space
Was ist V*
Algebraic dual
hab gegooglet
Shit sorry my parents are calling me for dinner I’m really sorry I’ll be back asap like 15min
set of all linear maps from V to a field K
body is funny to say, it's field actually 
Körper 🗿
für UVR musst du drei Sachen zeigen
- Neutrale Element ∈ U⁰
- a,b ∈ U⁰ folgt a+b ∈ U⁰
- λ ∈ K, a ∈ U⁰ folgt λa ∈ U⁰
bzw ?
beziehungsweise
Du musst hier wissen und benutzen, dass U ein UVR ist und dass f eine lineare Abbildung ist
Du musst dann deren Eigenschaften ausnutzen
@zenith stream Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Saved it 
(also, if you're curious, there's also another one #help-3
)
i am outside 
Awwww 
Hope you're having fun at least 
Been a long 15mins 
@zenith stream Has your question been resolved?
its important to take time to eat
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can’t figure out these last two questions
<@&286206848099549185>
what have you tried?
i have tried to calculate the area but failed
there are 42 i think
youre right about that, so just multiply and get your answer 🙂
nice i got the orange one done
yess, you can similarly get the purple one done as well 🙂
@wet current Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wet current
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Sorry, had to clean the kitchen
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Oh ok ty I could t figure out why it was
Muss ich das irgendwie beweisen? Oder wie kann ich zeigen dass es eine abb ist?
nein dass weiß man
ein element aus U^0 bedeutet dass es ein element von V* (Menge der linearen abbildungen) mit der eigenschaft dass halt auf das neutrale Element immer abgebildet wird
Ok also ich muss zeigen das U^0 ein UVR ist durch Beweis der drei Bedingungen von f?
mithilfe der eigenschaften von f (ist ja eine lineare abbildung) zeigst du die 3 uvr axiome
Ok… ich glaube ich habe nur irgendwo ein Beispiel vob solchen Aufgaben gespeichert.. Danke dir! Versuche erstmal das zu lösen 
wir können es zsm machen wenn du magst
Im welchem Sinne :0
ja hier
Ah ok hole nur mein pc auf händy ist beschissen
Will dir auch nicht Zeit nehmen fyi
wie du willst
Im Sinne wenn du etwas wichtiges hast will ich jetzt niecht das du meinend wegen das verschiebst aber ich wäre dankbar für die Hilfe
hätte ich was wichtiges, wäre ich nicht hier
ein 0 vektor der zur menge dazugehören muss?
ein neutrales element dann?
ja
ok.. um ganz ehrlich zu sein ist mein größtes problem gerade ist u^0 definition verstehen ich versuche mir das selbst gerade zu erklären sorry, gib mir eine sekunde
U^0 ist die Menge aller linearen Abbildungen V -> K mit der Eigenschaft, dass sie auf 0 abbilden
also von all den linearen abbildungen in V* ist U^0 eine teil menge mit elementen die nur auf 0 abbilden
man will jetzt zeigen, dass sie ein uvr ist
also dass man da so rechnen kann
ist V* das gleiche wie V->K...?????
ja L(V,K) so habe ich es verstanden
sorry, wenn dumme fragen, sitze an dem thema schon ganzen tag
kein problem lol
was bedueted nochmal auf 0 abbilden..
im sinne wie rec hnet man sowas
du setzt was in die abbildung ein, und da kommt 0 raus
OH'
ja
ok ok also, hold on, ich schreibe es mir kurz ins notitztbuch
also abbildung, also auf etwas wird abgebildet
du gibst dem was, der gibt dir was zurück
ja stimmt, habe vergessen, abbildungen waren letztes jahr bei mir chnell gemacht, sehe gerade das war ein fehler von ir longterm
ok also U^0 sind elemnte in V* die abbildungen auf 0 geben.. ok ich habs endlich kappiert, hoffe ich
elemente in U^0 ... aber ja
wait
und diese elementen (abbildungen) bilden auf 0 ab
ok uhh jetzte irgendiwe uvr beweisen.. du hasst nicht zufälliger weise irgendein beispiel erkläreng oder weist wo eine ist nach der ich mich richten kann..????
ich habe es selber versucht zu beweisen, deswegen habe ich angeboten dir zu helfen
ah ok danke
fangen wir an mit (1)
sorry nochmal, unser prof erklkärt nicht so und versuche alles selber zu lernen aber ist schwer
wir wissen dass 0 in U, weil U ein UVR ist von V. Außerdem wissen wir dass f in V* ist, das bedeutet also dass es eine lineare abb. von V auf K ist
welche eigenschaft haben wir für lineare abbildungen
angenommen f ist eine linear abb. welchen wert hat f(0)?
0..
ja, wegen der homogenität gilt ja f(0) = f(0v) = 0f(v) = 0
jetzt wo wir das alles wissen
was passiert mit f(0_u)
?
moment mir ist gerade was aufgefallen man
wir müssen 0 in V* betrachen also die nullabbildung
nicht das element 😮💨 mb
aber umso einfacher
erfüllt die null abbildung die bedingung?
oh ok
also es hat ein nullelement auf jeden fall..
hu
oder? fuckoing hell im dumb
(I was about to comment about whether you were considering the zero map, can't say I understand the conversation but guessing you spotted that(?)
)
nehme koffein hold on
gehirn functioniert nicht
ok wir fangen neu an
(1) wir wollen zeigen dass die Nullabbildung n(u) in V* auch in U^0 ist
jetzt musst du dich fragen, gilt denn n(u) = 0 für alle u?
n(u)?
ja so habe ich mal die null abbildung genannt
ja?? 
ok..
(mathematiker würden sagen trivial)
ok das zu (1), also ist n(u) auch in U^0
klar
so
jetzt (2)
ok,war mir gerade nikcht sicher
platzhalter macht das sinn?
ja, war einfach nicht sic her ob es ein n(u) gab das ich übersehen habe und habe die frage 30 mal niochmal gelesen
sorry
ok
\textbf{(2). Zu zeigen: } Seien $f,g \in U^0$. Dann ist auch $f+g \in U^0$.
2 muss ich zeigen dass die summe zweier vektoren wieder in U^0 sind?
jaa
oh waqit hier kann man mit latex schreiben???
ja 
yoooo what geil
habs dir anscheinend vorenthalten haha
genau das willst du ja zeigen
das haben wir, ok?
mhm (also wie schnell schnriebst du in latex omg 😭 )
was gilt dann unbedingt für f(u) und g(u)
ich habe das gefühl ich bin da komplett falsch, aber müssen die beiden.. 0 ergeben???
jaaaa

für alle u ergben die 0
ohhh ok
mhm
zweifel?
soll ich den haben???? 
und jetzt beweisen dass das produkt aus skalar und Vektor in U^0 vorhanden sind.... also 0? weil multipliziert mit 0..
uh oh
wir haben nur gesammelt an informationen die wir benutzen
werden
f+g in U^0 willst du zeigen
mhm
wie ist vektoraddition mit abbildungen definiert?
uhh... hold on machen die abbildungen ein unterschied von einer normalen vektoraddition..?
in einem vektorraum nennt man bezeichnet man die elemente als vektoren
das ist vlt bisschen seltsam weil das in der schule anders beigebracht wurde
aber so ist es in der linearen algebra
und auf einem vektorraum gibt es zumal eine vektoraddition also wie man die sogennanten elemente (vektoren) zusammen addiert (muss nicht das klassische addieren sein, was man kennt)
v + w ∈ U, ∀v, w ∈ U?
ist das nicht =fu+gu
yep so ists ja definiert
f(u)+g(u)
SO
und was ergibt das, welche Annahme trafen wir über f(u) und g(u)
f(u)=0 und g(u)=0??
ja
also erfüllt f+g auch die bedingung, dass es auf 0 abbildet, für alle u
damit wärst du durch
Du benutzt doch das, was schon wahr ist
Wir haben gesagt f und g sind elemente in U^0, dann gilt f(u) = 0 und g(u) = 0 für alle u
das darfst du da benutzen
ok.. und für skalarprodukt
(λ · f)(u) = λ · f(u)=0?
ja weil f(u) ein element von U^0 ist
yey :)
jetzt noch bisschen alles vernünftiger aufschreiben und das wars
danke T-T
kd!
(minor comment from me lurking
but as you know f(u) = 0 for all u in U, you may want to add in that lambda * f(u) is lambda * 0, which then works out to be 0
)
ich verstehe nicht was sogar mein problem jetzte war, fühl mich so dumm, ist in sich einfach..
OH ok ty!!
i actually thought about whether to mention it, should have 
willkommen in mathe bzw. lineare algebra
Makes things clearer, and shows how things follow on 
ill try to write it prpperly, and do my best to do the erst... tbh my biggest issue have been definitions
im starting to understand why the biology majors chose biology to avoid math
my biochem class genuienly easier than beginners math 
silly small things that will kill you somehow
smells like definitions, if you dont know them 
bio majors memorising all of math so tghey never have to deal witgh it again
die anderen aufgaben sehen krasser aus
i shoukld get on that grind
i se
ich habe bis 8 uhr morgen, chat how cooked am i
this is all of it but my part is 2.2
(ii)
gotta hanbd it in tmw
im ina group with two engineering masters and last week we got a bad grade bc of me so im paranoid about making mistakes rn, honestly was scared af to ask for help here
tutorium
okok
Ja also (i) haben wir richtig, du musst halt schauen, dass du den Beweis richtig schreibst, also dass er logisch ist
yessir 
Ok also für die (ii) a)
(btw you're always welcome to ask for help here now, we're quite friendly, I would like to think
)
tbh i think like a year or more ago i asked for help in general and got like someone message me mean stuff so i kinda was too afraid to try again but im glad i didm you guys r awesome :)
Wenn ich mir das anschaue, die linke Menge bedeutet
[ (U_1+U_2)^0 \coloneqq {f \in V^{\star} \mid f(u) = 0, \quad \forall u \in U_1+U_2} ]
nein, das ist schon definiert, ich wollte nur herausfinden wie genau, damit man ja iwie anfangen kann
ah ok weis tbh jetzt auch nicht ib mann das etzte einfach ebweisen soll oder ausrechnen oder wie
,, U_1^0 \cap U_2^0 \coloneqq { f \in V^{\star} \mid f(u_1) = 0 \text{ und } f(u_2) = 0, \quad \forall u_1 \in U_1, \forall u_2 \in U_2 }
does this make sense chartbit?
$f(u_1)=0$ weil $f(u)=0$ ?
Inoghmia
was wir machen können ist zeigen, dass
[ A = B \lr \forall a \in A : a \in B \text{ und } \forall b \in B : b \in A ]
also jedes element in (U1+U2)^0 ist auch im Schnitt und umgekehrt
ohh ok
Also fangen wir an mit der einen seite
also im prinzip you show that both are subsets of each other
was ist nochmal der unetrschied zwischen inem teilraum und einer teilmenge? ist es nur weil es uvr sind?
teilraum meint man uvr
Frage wie ist f definiert?
Kannst du mir sagen was für f gilt?
uhh sekunde...
warte steht da nicht alles schon was für f gilt?
ich will es in deinen worten was konkret für f gilt
f muss auf allen vektoren von u1 und u2 0 annehmen ..?
konkret weißt du f(u) = 0 für alle u in U1+U2
wenn u in U1+U2 was gilt dann für u nach Definition der direkten summe?
u1 +u2 müssen 0 ergeben aber ich folge glaube nicht was das jetzt für u bedueted..
ja
ja
are you doing 2.2.ii?
yeah hes basiacly tutoring me while my brain turns to nush bc i need to hand it in by tmw
ganz ehrlich, ich weis nicht...also ich weis mit linearen abb kann man rechnen aber ich bin mir jetzte nicht sicher was man hier weiter machen kann
i see
for (a) it might be easier to do a double subset proof rather than trying to write a chain of set equalities
thats what we were actually aiming for
mb idk german
maybe i got lost somewhere
can you give me a minute, im gonna make some coffe
1 am
im struggling to form thoughts
did u already prove LHS subset RHS?
thats what we do rn
yea
yeah, but i currently have issue remebering words, ill survive tzmw on 2h or smth
let $f\in(U_1+U_2)^0$ then aim to show $f\in U_1^0$ and $f\in U_2^0$
ロケットジャンプ
yes?
ofc u know but what about inoghmia 🙂
chart needs a hobby
ig we wait for inoghmia to caffeinate
well adonis and chart can wait. i have a meeting soon
i think we were actually doing well so far
I'm literally just watching videos and chilling 
hey willst du auf Deutsch oder Englisch weiter
at this point im just trying my best to understand anything so that i can word it nicely later in latex, ill worry about fully understaning remebering and practicing later
mathe wörter deutsch aberv alles andere egal
so far nothing about concepts, just writing goals
claim: $(U_1+U_2)^0\ss U_1^0\cap U_2^0$
ロケットジャンプ
last week my group flopped bc of me so im just trying my best to not dissapoint them again
to prove this, let $f\in(U_1+U_2)^0$ then aim to show $f\in U_1^0$ and $f\in U_2^0$
ロケットジャンプ
ok
yeah i thik i saw an example similar to this
ロケットジャンプ
to show $f\in U_1^0$ we must show $f(u)=0$ for all $u\in U_1$
ロケットジャンプ
ok gotta leave this to adonis. hope the setup helps
guess i can go now 
pleas e dont leave me-
unless u have to sleep
or do smth
i dont want to take up your time if oyu dont ha any to spare

hmm okay
Assume $f \in (U_1+U_2)^0$ then we know $f(u) = 0$ for all $u \in U_1+U_2$.
i think?
ja, also was bedueted das fur $f \in (U_1+U_2)^0$
nein u
Inoghmia
Oh, so it’s german
ja das habe ich hier geschrieben

wir wissen f(u) = 0 für alle u in U1+U2
jetzt frage ich wwas bedeutet u in U1+U2 konkret
Sorry for disturbance, i go sleep now
meinet das als eine frage 
hier
das bedeutet es
wie ganz vorher nur dass u aus einer anderen menge kommt
u ist in U1 und U2 vorhandene..? ist es eine teilmenge..?
nicht unbedingt und u ist keine Menge sondern element

definition!!
oh ok
,, U_1+U_2 \coloneqq { u_1+u_2 \mid u_1 \in U_1, : u_2 \in U_2 }
oh stimmt man macht ja dann u2, u1.. hab vergessen
u ist in U1 + U2 also müssen doch solche u1 u2 existieren
aus denen u sich zsm setzt
habe das gemeint bin eben nur.. dumm, muss an definitionen arbeiten.. 
ok kein problem ist auch spät
,, u \in U_1+U_2 \ri (\exists u_1 \in U_1) , (\exists u_2 \in U_2) \text{ such that } u = u_1+u_2
klar?
wird das nicht durch ie vorherige definition von dir erklärt?
ja
oh ok
aber bei eine beweis schreiben wir das auf
die definition schreibe ich für dich
die sollte man im kopf haben
danke 
als in das f(u)=0?????
...0?
jetzt nutz die linearität von f aus
ergibt sich dann nicht u1+u2=u1+u2 ???? 😭
wat
i need to kill myself at this point
im honesstly not sure my vision is kinda bury
literally or metaphorically?
literally
That's a no then 
How much sleep did you have the night before? 
i think i havent slept for abiut 28h im insomniac
i took 400 mg caffeine im awake just, might have side effects, happens sometinmes, i thjink i need to take an hiourand wait till they wear off
"side effects" 
I do hope they wear off but even at that, just the sound of that 
When do you think you'd be able to rest by a decent amount? 
probs tmw ill sleep in the afzernoon before work
or pass out in class my prof is chilkl like thagt, lets me sleep
Awwww, well I do hope you get a decent (and uninterrupted!) amount of sleep soon 
For a moment when I saw this, I thought you may have needed to do more, but at least it's just 2.2 you need 
I think they should be doable (the ones y'all haven't yet done, of course!)
ty man
oh no dude if i had to do everything i think id just cry
I would cry too, and I'm not even the one doing them 
idk, ill try to sleep now, caffeien sometimes has an olpposite effect on me of making me sleepy, ill wake up later and contnue in the morning
ive been at math for like 10h rn so mabe its just my brain overlaodng
That is a long time to be working on something for sure, you definitely need to take a break, and get some rest 
And yea, sometimes it does be like that
when do you think you might wake up? 
u right, imma take a shower, eat, wait till my head isnt pulsing anymore and my vision evens out
youtube 1h timer, headphones in and set on full volume is my go to combo
Yep, you should! If you aren't feeling great then better to wait until it gets better at least 
@zenith stream Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @zenith stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Arg(-1+i) = 3π/4 and Arg (-1-i) = -3π/4. Is it because the result should be in -π and π?
yes
,w range of arg function
anyway, yes itll only output a number between -pi and pi
Closed by @zenith hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me on the clarification for why we don't use standard error here? (ping me pls if u respond)
ik the transformation part
mu=3990
sigma=146.64
im aware z scores only use standard deviation
but like conceptually how would i know that i guess is the question
ik standard deviation is the variation of a single sample
and standard error is the variation of sample statistics from the true population parameter
if i used standard error would that be like saying we're trying to find if a sample with mu=4200 is significantly different from the population parameters?
@jolly basin Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @jolly basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I need the region common to x^2+y^2≤1 and z=x+3
Well, I suppose I could start by paramatrizing the cylinder
(cos(t),sin(t), h)
they intersect along the curve $( rcos(t), rsin(t), 3+ rcos(t)); 0≤r≤1; 0≤t≤2π$
What a wonderful world !
Would that be right
@marsh forum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, can anyone explain me what a finite cover is and how to identify them from open sets? Thanks
@warm trench Has your question been resolved?
A cover is a set of sets, such that the union over the cover contains the whole set
If the cover has finite elements, then it is called a finite cover
does a cover need to be bounded for it to be a finite cover?
interesting
okok, for example i have the set A, set A has the covers
- (-\inf, 0]
- (-1,1)
- (1/k, 3-1/k)_k=1^\inf
i would assume the first one is not a finite cover, the second one is a finite cover
Hang on
im still unsure how i should categorise the third one
but theyre intervals
yeah im a bit confused at this one
Infinitely many sets = infinite cover
These are two sets
A cover is a set of subsets of the space
It is not a subset of the space
How many elements the set has determines the size of the cover
You just covered all of R in two sets
(-\infty, 0] and [0, \infty)
That cover has a size of two
Im confusing you lol
lol
im forsure not taking analysis
cover is a set of subsets, so if i have (-1,2), the cover should be {(-1,1),(0,2)}
So, a cover of X is a set $A$ such that $$X\subseteq\bigcup_{i\in A}i$$
Cycadellic
uh
this is pretty different from the definition i found
or maybe its just the wording
${u_\alpha}\alpha\in S$ is a cover of $A$ if $$A\subseteq\bigcup{\alpha\in S}u_\alpha$$
Potus
We just say alpha instead of u_alpha
alr
A cover is finite iff the size of the set is finite
In other words, there is a natural number
The white are a cover on the red circle
i see it now
This is a finite cover, because its has 7 sets
And its not that its bounded i misunderstood
lole
We call the elements the covering sets
If every covering set is open, it is called an open cover
and for a set to be compact, every cover of A must be open and finite?
A set is defined to be compact iff every open cover has a finite subcover
ah, so it only applies for the open covers of a set A
We define a subcover to be a set of covering sets such that, it covers a subset
uh
Hm?
It must cover a subset of the particular “open cover” and also be a cover of the compact set in question
ah
so, a cover that already covers a subset of an open cover and the compact set
is a subcover
Yeah
Just think of it as a subset of sorts
Theres actually a general word for this, a “subobject”
i havent gotten to that part
Thats not in analysis lol
lol
Thats more grad algebra and category theory especially
yeah i cannot differentiate between analysis and algebra
Analysis is an algebra
but not all algebra is analysis?
Its just studying continuity on a connected field
Yeah
Mayne
You can do every algebra up to vector spaces on them
alr alr back on topic
Compactness
so, what properties should the subcover possess for it to be classified as a finite subcover?
Just if i can cover it in finitely many sets
ah ic
so $$(\frac{1}{k}, 2-\frac{1}{k})_{k=1}^\inf$$ is not finite
ffs
you get the idea
its \frac{ }{ }
ah
Potus
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
there we go
if you union it with a finite set?
Covers are closed under unions
ah
Wdym exactly
We have multiple sets to choose different types of objects of at this point
yeah nvm
would (-2,1) be compact if the cover is {(-\inf,0), (-1,1/2),(0,1),(0.1,9)}?
i am inclined it believe it is, but there isnt a finite subcover
or mb im wrong
Okay so (-2,1)
Consider your open cover
We want to find a finite subcover
ideally, a finite subcover must contain the compact set in consideration
but there isnt, so (-2,1) is not compact
Youre overthinking
😭