#help-38

1 messages · Page 219 of 1

bright quarry
#

think of like "largest" accumulation value vs "smallest" accumulation value

trim lichen
#

hold on tho

#

i dont think you got that right for the exponent then

bright quarry
#

🤔

trim lichen
#

wait

#

oh yeah ok

bright quarry
#

the root test says that if the limsup |a_n|^(1/n) < 1 then the series converges absolutely

#

diverges if it’s > 1

dusky thunder
#

yes

bright quarry
#

no information if it equals 1

#

ratio test would be $\limsup \biggr|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\biggr| < 1$

solid kilnBOT
bright quarry
#

for absolute convergence

#

and liminf > 1

#

for divergence

#

so in this example you can just break this up into even/odd n and use the root test to show that the limsup is 1/2 so it’s absolutely convergent but using the ratio test after splitting even and odd n youd get 1/8 for liminf and 2 for limsup

#

so limsup is not less than 1 and liminf is not greater than 1

#

no information

#

but in most normal looking series you come across it would probably just come down to what’s more convenient to use

#

and it wouldn’t make a difference

dusky thunder
bright quarry
#

like when the limits both exist for the ratio and root i don’t think it makes a difference

bright quarry
dusky thunder
#

yeah i think in my case thats gonna be the series we tackle

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dusky thunder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grand wave
#

I want to ask about scalar projection. Im not sure i understand how it works. I understand that scalar projection is to show how much object is in front of you or behind you, i know it returns a single number and if number is positive its in front of you and if negative is behind you. Im just curious cant this be done by getting magnitude/distance between 2 vectors to game same thing?

ionic pendant
#

well a projection is a way to get the component of one vector in the direction of another vector

grand wave
ionic pendant
#

so in this example we are interested in the projection of y onto x

#

the vector projection of y onto x is the purple vector

#

the scalar projection of y onto x is the magnitude of that projection with a sign, being positive if it points in the direction of x and negative if it points in the opposite direction

#

so if x is "forward", then it is positive if y points "ahead" and negative if y points "behind"

grand wave
#

With my understanding that scalar projection returns a single number, which means its not a vector. Its just confusing for me.

#

It sounds simple, its magnitude between 2 vectors, so the key difference is that we know if its forward or behind?
But not sure how the distance is correct if the x line is straight and its not poining straight to y? Its like never reaches the y

#

Is it just showing how far ahead or behind it is rather showing the distance between 2 objects?

#

because for me it just seems that these both shows magnitude but in a sense its different and magnitude for me what is the distance directly from one object to another

heady furnace
#

magnitude can't be negative, in this case it just shows the distance

#

(this is because magnitude is calculated via pythagoras' theorem, which always gives a positive number)

#

while a scalar projection uses a frame of reference that can have negative values

grand wave
#

ok but does scalar projection shows the magnitude directly between 2 object or just how far ahead or behind its is in the directions they facing?

heady furnace
#

scalar doesn't show the magnitude of the distance vector, no

grand wave
#

Ok but what if happens when the scalar projections gets used on this case?

#

the distance clearly is not 0 but would the product be 0?

heady furnace
#

the scalar projection would be 0

#

it would not be either ahead or behind it

#

the magnitude of the distance vector would not be 0

grand wave
#

but the guides i read states that scalar projections shows the distance betwen 2 object, so in this case it only shows how far ahead or behind it is and not direct distance between 2 of them

heady furnace
#

it is not totally correct in telling the distance between 2 objects

#

with 2 scalar projections (like x and y axis) you can calculate the distance between 2 objects

#

but a scalar projection alone without any other information does not really show the distance between two objects unless they are aligned along the projection axis

grand wave
#

Ok so i understand there is 2 types of magnitudes?

heady furnace
#

not quite

#

the magnitude of the distance vector is just "how long the vector is"

#

but you can also express vectors if you have a frame of reference

#

like a x and y axis

grand wave
#

wait isint magnitue is a length between 2 vectors and its the same? magnitue == distance

heady furnace
#

in this particular case yes

#

it's the distance between the tail and the head of a vector if you want to see it that way

#

but vectors aren't always used for distances

grand wave
#

i understand that, im just a bit confused.
So scalar projection shows what?

heady furnace
#

have you worked with points in x and y axis before?

grand wave
#

I understand the x and y axis i just dont understand the concept of the scalar projection.

heady furnace
#

it's like the x and y coordinates of the object

#

you project the object along one axis

grand wave
#

So it show magnitude only perpendicular to the 2 objects?

heady furnace
#

kind of, but it could be negative

grand wave
#

so it cant be parallel?

heady furnace
#

you always have a way to find a perpendicular from a point to a line

grand wave
#

I know that there is math to found all solutions to the problems. Im just confused on the rules that follow scalar projection

heady furnace
#

this is basically scalar projection
P_y is projection of P along the y axis, and P_x is the projection along the x axis

#

it can be confusing because you could rotate the x and y axis but scalar projection requires a frame of reference

grand wave
#

what, i never seen 2 projections

#

the whole definition of scalar projection just doesnt make sense anymore

#

That looks more like Vector Projection

heady furnace
#

scalar projection is a projection onto another vector

#

i forgot to put the arrows on x and y

#

my bad

grand wave
#

Simply saying scalar projection is like 90 degree shadow and result is the distance between the one vector and where the shadow projected stops

heady furnace
#

if the shadow is perpendicularly to where you are projecting, yes

grand wave
#

isint it always perpendicular?

heady furnace
#

it usually depends on where you shine the light from but logically speaking yes it is perpendicular

grand wave
#

i just thought of that , so it can come into play later when i learn the degree of which shadow is casted

heady furnace
#

it does

grand wave
#

Thanks a lot for struggling with me

heady furnace
#

no prob

grand wave
#

!close

heady furnace
#

i think it is .close

#

.close

grand wave
#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @grand wave

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

valid hamlet
#

This week i learned propagation of errors, absolute uncertainty and etc. I would like to ask if you guys could check if i did this question right

valid hamlet
#

So f= 530^2.

So delta_f = 3.8% x 530^2

#

I cleaned it up a bit

trim joltBOT
#

@valid hamlet Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

formal jasper
#

hello! can anyone help me spot my mistake

formal jasper
#

im stuck :(

#

oh, the E corner is the bottom right corner of the yellow square

#

the translator messed it up

drifting blaze
#

Wait a minute

#

The 8/7 information is given to you?

formal jasper
#

yeah

#

the translator messed it up so i had to write it

drifting blaze
#

Oh ok then ignore what I said

formal jasper
#

ohh okayy

drifting blaze
#

Someone else would help you.

formal jasper
#

thanks ^^

#

<@&286206848099549185>

trim joltBOT
#

@formal jasper Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dreamy pewter
#

Hello, could someone please help me with this exercise?

trim joltBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
sturdy fiber
dreamy pewter
#

4

#

I got an answer and would like my work checked.

sturdy fiber
#

ok

dreamy pewter
#

i solved the inequality by the method <=-3 and => 3, and then i solved it as a rational inequality in both cases, and i got [-6/5,-1/2)U(-1/2,0]

#

but i dont know if it is ok

#

and the answer doesnt match

sturdy fiber
#

which answer did you get?

dreamy pewter
#

in the first case ( => 3) i got [-6/5,-1/2) and in the second one (<=-3) i got (-1/2,0]

#

i thought it was option 1 or 3 but it doesnt match

#

idk if i did something wrong

sturdy fiber
#

are you willing to share your notes so that we can see your attempt to solve the exercise?

dreamy pewter
#

okay, give me a sec

sturdy fiber
#

-1/2 is excluded

#

yeah it's option 3

dreamy pewter
#

and where is the zero in -1/2

#

isn't it supposed to be -1/2,0?

#

Look my notes btw

#

lol i sent it in 144p

#

im sorry, its my phone

sturdy fiber
#

[-6/5,-1/2)U(-1/2,0] and [-6/5,0]-{-1/2} are the same cause you subtract -1/2 from the range, since you cannot include it

sturdy fiber
dreamy pewter
#

ohh i got it

dreamy pewter
#

thank you man

#

so its option 3

#

perfect

sturdy fiber
#

yes

trim joltBOT
#

@dreamy pewter Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @dreamy pewter

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

marsh forum
#

Trying to determine if this converges or not

marsh forum
#

to start, we check for absolute convergence

#

so we check $\sum \frac{ \sqrt{n}}{n+1}$ for convergence

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

simple haven
#

You don't need to check for absolute convergence

marsh forum
#

Yeah, just realised

#

divergence test works, I think

simple haven
#

An alternating series is convergent if it's decreasing (in abs, and the sequence converges to 0)

marsh forum
simple haven
#

This series is not absolutely convergent btw

trim lichen
marsh forum
simple haven
#

Yup

marsh forum
#

the limit of a_n diverges to infty

ionic pendant
#

does it?

marsh forum
#

no

trim lichen
#

a_n itself does not approach infty

marsh forum
#

or a comparision would work then

trim lichen
#

sqrt(n)/(n+1) behaves roughly as 1/sqrt(n)

marsh forum
#

$\frac{1}{n+1}< \frac{ \sqrt{n}}{n+1}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

As the harmonic series diverges , so does this

ionic pendant
#

for pretty much all algebraic functions the limit comparison test is the most straightforward method

marsh forum
#

This next

simple haven
#

Which wins, exponential growth or cubic growth?

#

Or I guess really the question should be exponential growth or quartic growth (because the denominator needs to be more than one exponent bigger to converge)

marsh forum
trim lichen
#

no

#

that is way overcomplicated

marsh forum
#

root test should work, no?

#

that or the ratio test

#

ratio may be easier here

#

$\lim_{n \to \infty} 5 \frac{n^3}{(n+1)^3}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

the limit is 5, which is greater than 1, thus it diverges

trim lichen
#

mmm

#

can you show your work and the exact wording of the test you applied

#

cause i think you may have gotten some things backwards.

marsh forum
#

$\frac{\frac{(n+1)^3}}{5^{n+1}}{\frac{n^3}{5^n}}$

trim lichen
#

$\frac{ (n+1)^3/5^{n+1} }{ n^3/5^n}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

trim lichen
#

this is what you should've had

marsh forum
#

yea

trim lichen
#

ok

#

no backwardness so far

#

but your simplification of it was wrong

marsh forum
#

yea, the limit is 1/5

#

not 5

trim lichen
#

yes

#

do you know the spirit of the ratio test?

#

imo it's as important (if not more so) as knowing its literal statement

marsh forum
#

We are approximating it as a GP

trim lichen
#

yes

#

yours is like a GP with common ratio 1/5

#

you should expect it to converge

marsh forum
#

I'd like to solve a couple more problems, I'll post 'em here?

trim lichen
#

more series shit?

#

yeah whatever

marsh forum
#

Root test

#

so $\lim_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n] {a_n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n^2+1}{2n^2+1} =\frac{1}{2}<1 \implies \text{ convergence }$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

This works?

#

one more question

#

This series can be re-wriiten as $\sum a_n + \frac{a_n}{n}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

$a_n$ converges, so we just have to show $\sum \frac{a_n}{n}$ converges

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

Can I have a hint

#

A comparison test, will likely not work here

#

or it may actually

#

$a_n< \frac{1}{n^p} \text{ for some p ≥2 , thus } a_n/n< 1/n^{p+1}$, which converges, and we're done

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

yea, probably wrong

#

for sufficently large n

#

okay, I'm gong insame

#

am I not

#

$\abs{a_n/n}< {a_n}$, $\abs{a_n}$ converges, so $\abs{a_n/n}$ converges too, thus $a_n/n$ converges

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @marsh forum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean kraken
#

Unit digit

trim joltBOT
lean kraken
#

How can I apply mod 10 here

#

I tried to do it separately but i got -7?

#

2^23^24 mod 10 is 2

#

9^24^23 mod 10 is 1

half vigil
#

2-1 = 1

lean kraken
trim lichen
#

well none of these answers could POSSIBLY be correct because you are subtracting even minus odd

#

this much you can see even without any calculations

#

the number will be odd and so end in an odd digit, so there is no correct option

trim lichen
lean kraken
#

I only got 2 and 1

trim lichen
#

assuming you got that correct (which it looks like you did), the answer would be 1.

lean kraken
#

thanks ann

#

Power of any even number would be even? And power of odd number will be odd always?

#

Yes it is

#

+close

half vigil
#

it's .

half vigil
trim joltBOT
#

@lean kraken Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @lean kraken

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wraith hinge
#

How do i get e ?

trim joltBOT
sacred sapphire
#

you know what d is

wraith hinge
#

Yep its 60

wraith hinge
sacred sapphire
#

no

wraith hinge
#

Oki

sacred sapphire
#

look closer

wraith hinge
#

Mm not sure

sacred sapphire
wraith hinge
#

Ohh angles on a straight line?

sacred sapphire
#

yes

wraith hinge
#

Ok that would be 120

#

So 120 +40 + e =180?

sacred sapphire
#

yes

wraith hinge
#

Oo ok so its 20

#

How do we know triangle ACE is not a isoscelec triangle

#

Incase i accidentally take it as a isosceles triangle?

sacred sapphire
#

because its not stated anywhere?

wraith hinge
#

Ohh oki

sacred sapphire
#

and you shouldnt randomly assume stuff

wraith hinge
#

Oo oki

#

Thank u very much

#

Have a nice day

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @full wave

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frosty nebula
#

What's the formula for vertical asymptote?

woven python
#

depends but think of it as a abscissa or ordinate where the function or curve diverges to infinity

frosty nebula
#

chatgpt didn't help me

woven python
#

for example, $y=\frac{1}{x-a}$ has vertical asymptote at $x=a$ because the functiob diverges to $\pm \infty$ there

frosty nebula
solid kilnBOT
#

parabolicinsanity

frosty nebula
woven python
#

i mean, yeah i guess but what i meant to say was to be taken more as intuition

frosty nebula
#

Like yhis

woven python
#

what

#

i mean sure

#

if $\abs{\lim_{x\to a^{\pm}}f(x)}=\infty$ then there's a vertical asymptote

solid kilnBOT
#

parabolicinsanity

woven python
#

i guess

#

at x=a

frosty nebula
woven python
#

yeah so there's an asymptote there sully

frosty nebula
#

And.... How do I find it?

woven python
#

breadpensive literally find the point where there is divergence to infinity

#

thats all

#

thats what an asymptote is

#

so in that problem the asymptote is x=1

frosty nebula
#

Oh

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @frosty nebula

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wraith hinge
#

Cn someone help me with this

trim joltBOT
wraith hinge
#

Can someone explain it to me cus i cant understand it

trim joltBOT
#

@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?

lusty token
#

This is the thing that has kept you up at night all week! That darn unit circle! So many roots and fractions and pies, how will you get it all in your head? Actually it's super easy to memorize the unit circle if you know a few tricks, so check this out and rest easy tonight!

Watch the whole Mathematics playlist: http://bit.ly/ProfDaveMath

Cla...

▶ Play video
lusty token
#

No need to watch the whole video

#

@wraith hinge

shrewd hollow
trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

livid bolt
trim joltBOT
livid bolt
#

I'm going over

#

Ellipses

#

In class

#

And honestly I don't know what the fuck the teacher's talking about

#

I'm super confused

#

Does someone have any reccomendations for this

#

I am on calculus if that helps?

#

Like any videos or pages to check info about this specifically... maybe? I dunno I am lost

#

Or Hell just an explanation of what they did would be thankful

hidden dew
# livid bolt

seems like deriving the standard form where the center is (0,0)

livid bolt
hidden dew
#

$\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=1$

solid kilnBOT
#

yoboiqimmah

hidden dew
livid bolt
#

Yes

#

This is the standard form

#

Okay

hidden dew
#

yep they just deriving this form where a>b

livid bolt
hidden dew
livid bolt
#

Neat

#

Gonna close for now since I have more classes and need to watch and understand this anyways

#

Gonna pop up later again

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @livid bolt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

marsh forum
#

I'd like to test this for convergence

trim joltBOT
marsh forum
#

we can use the divergence test

#

nvm

#

bad idea

#

root test

#

$\frac{ \sqrt[n]{n!}}{e^n}< \frac{n!}{e^n}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

This doesn't work either

nova spire
#

you could do that

marsh forum
#

hmm

nova spire
#

what about ratio test

marsh forum
#

$\frac{(n+1} e^{{(n+1)^2}}{e^{n^2}}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

oops

nova spire
#

$\frac{(n+1) e^{{(n+1)^2}}}{e^{n^2}}$

solid kilnBOT
#

rafilou is not not born in 2003

marsh forum
#

yea, thanks

nova spire
#

but that seems wrong

#

what are you doing

#

a_(n+1)/a_n?

marsh forum
#

yea

nova spire
#

check your exps then

marsh forum
#

okie

#

got it

#

$\frac{(n+1) e^{n^2}}{e^{(n+1)^2}}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

I then divide the num and denom by $e^{(n+1)^2}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

ncm

#

*nvm

#

$lim_{n \to \infty} (n+1)e^{n^2- (n+1)^2}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

which is $\lim_{n \to \infty} (n+1) e^{-(2n+1)}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

marsh forum
#

which goes to 0

#

So it converges?

nova spire
#

yeah

marsh forum
#

Thanks

#

This next

#

This is calling for a comparison test imo

#

or nvm, that won't work

#

I was thinking of comparing it with 1/√n

nova spire
#

there is comparison at play

#

but 1/sqrt(n) is too bad

marsh forum
#

yeah, I realise, I'm thinking

nova spire
#

the sqrt(n) we won't touch

#

think about what you can do with the sin thingy

trim lichen
#

and thus the direction of comparison that produces a conclusive result

marsh forum
#

I can probably sandwich it

trim lichen
#

if the reference series is convergent, then the only fruitful direction is yours <= ref

#

if the reference series is divergent, then the only fruitful direction is yours >= ref

marsh forum
#

I have a feeling this diverges

#

nvm, it converges

#

sin(1/n) goes to 0

trim lichen
marble wharf
#

and?

#

1/sqrt(n) goes to 0 aswell

trim lichen
#

the general term of your series does approach 0, but that does not a convergent series make

#

@worldly cargo hi, do you have any more insightful and valuable commentary to add?

marsh forum
#

1/n< 1/√n

#

<@&268886789983436800>

trim lichen
#

any more? this is all so extremely relevant to this series question after all...

marsh forum
#

also, congrats rafilou

chilly bobcat
nova spire
#

welp wasn't fast enough to be my first, thanks eric

marsh forum
#

1/n≤sin(1/n)/√n<1/√n

chilly bobcat
#

nsin(1/n) approaches 1?

marble wharf
#

comparing it to 1/n would still not be enough

marsh forum
trim lichen
marsh forum
marsh forum
#

?

nova spire
marble wharf
#

lets pretend we are physicists for a moment. what would we do?

chilly bobcat
marsh forum
#

sin(1/n)~1/n

nova spire
marble wharf
#

and what would we get then?

marsh forum
#

so I compare it to 1/n^{3/2}

marble wharf
#

1/

marsh forum
#

which converges

#

so this converges too?

marble wharf
#

good so now we know what we want to show

#

and clearly the key will be to rigorously compare sin(1/n) and 1/n

marsh forum
#

Even for a calc 2 course?

nova spire
#

yeah

#

every step needs to be rigorous

marsh forum
#

okay

nova spire
#

but there's a simple reason

#

why sin(1/n) is equivalent to 1/n

#

when n-> infinity

marsh forum
#

1/n \to 0

#

so we can replace 1/n with x as x \to 0

nova spire
#

it's the other way around but yes

#

sin(x)/x -> 1 as x-> 0

#

so "x = 1/n"

marsh forum
#

okie

#

thanks

marble wharf
#

a much easier solution is to say that sin(1/n) < 2/n

marsh forum
#

oh, fair

#

yes

nova spire
#

just sin(1/n) <= 1/n

#

why the 2

marble wharf
#

I never wanna bother thinking about whether they intersect

nova spire
#

?

#

they don't

#

sin(x) < x when x > 0

marble wharf
#

I'm not saying that the 2/n is optimized

#

but depending on the level its much easier to argue

#

although I guess at calc 2 level it doesnt matter anymore

#

we had the same problem some months ago and werent able to show sin(x) < x yet iirc

nova spire
#

how about just

#

sin(x) <= x

trim lichen
#

yeah we do not need a strict comparison here

marsh forum
#

I would like to solve a few more problems

#

This is pretty easy $\frac{k \ln(k)}{(k+1^3)}< \frac{k^2}{(k+1)^3}$\
To show the bigger series converges, we use the ratio test \
$\lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{ (k+1)^2 (k+2)^3}{ k^2 \cdot (k+1)^3}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

trim lichen
#

yeah?

#

and what's that give you then huh

marsh forum
#

the limit is 1, so inconclusive

trim lichen
#

easy
inconclusive

#

i believe this is what is known in the industry as a flop face first

#

maybe you should not have bounded the logarithm so crudely

#

also once again

#

tell me: what kind of familiar behavior does the ratio test capture

marsh forum
#

it treats the series as a GP

trim lichen
#

ok

#

does your series even remotely smell like a GP

marsh forum
#

no

trim lichen
#

ok then maybe trying to shoehorn ratio test is gonna be a bad idea

marsh forum
#

Well, then I want a comparison test, because the root test isn't going to be pleasent here

#

neither is the integral test

trim lichen
#

root test also captures GP-like behavior

#

anyway you're right that you want some kind of comparison

#

note that log(x) is dominated by any power function x^p as long as p > 0

marsh forum
#

yea

nova spire
#

so

#

you don't have to go as big as p = 1

trim lichen
#

$\log(k) < k^{0.42069}$

solid kilnBOT
trim lichen
marsh forum
#

so I can do somethiing like

nova spire
#

p = 0.9999999999 is good

marsh forum
#

$k^{1.5}/(k+1)^3}$

solid kilnBOT
#

What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

nova spire
#

yeah sure

trim lichen
#

now you have you justify why that one converges.

marsh forum
#

1/k^{1.5} converges

trim lichen
#

can you turn this into a rigorous comparison

#

or is this 'long run behavior' thing already acceptable in your class

marsh forum
#

Well, our tutor used it

#

more rigourlsy though, I'd probably do a ratio or root test

trim lichen
#

no you wouldn't

#

and you should be able to tell me why you wouldn't

#

not least because we discussed it a mere fifteen minutes ago

marsh forum
#

Because it doesn't look much like a GP

#

k^{1.5}/(k+1)^3< k^{1.5}/k^3

#

that's what I'd do

trim lichen
trim lichen
#

now you have an honest to goodness p-series

marsh forum
#

Can I do a couple more

marble wharf
#

no, we will arrest you

#

what do you think

marsh forum
#

no, like can I get help with a few more

marsh forum
#

I need something smaller than ln(n) for an effective comparison

#

like i want to comapre it with something bigger first to see if it converges

trim lichen
#

$(\log(n))^{\log(n)} = n^{\log\log(n)}$

solid kilnBOT
marsh forum
#

yea

trim lichen
#

loglog(n) is quite the sluggish function but it does outgrow any constant, e.g. 2

marsh forum
#

hmm

marble wharf
#

when n is big enough then loglogn is bigger than 2

marsh forum
#

so it does converge

marble wharf
#

why?

marsh forum
#

as when n is big enough, it decreases faster than any n^p series

marsh forum
trim lichen
#

make it rigorous

#

do a proper comparison test thing again

marsh forum
#

Honestly, is it fine if I do this later, just realised I have to read a few ethnographies for my exam this friday

#

I forgot about that exam

marble wharf
#

you may want to let n_0 be the number for which loglogn>2 and split the sum

trim joltBOT
#

@marsh forum Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Channel closed

Closed by @marsh forum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wraith hinge
#

how is my answer wrong

trim joltBOT
split chasm
#

how are you getting the 36

#

and the -0 s

#

try to look more carefully at the image

wraith hinge
#

are the 0s not correct

#

(x-0)^2 + (y+1)^2 = 49?

ionic finch
#

yeah

#

do you actually have 9 attempts

#

for one question

wraith hinge
#

lol yea

ionic finch
#

lmfao

#

insanity

wraith hinge
#

ik im making simple mistakes

#

tyy

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @warm helm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

modern spear
#

where should i start with this question

modern spear
#

the second part of the question is confusing

red loom
#

note that a geometric series is always of the form (a+ar+ar^2+ar^3+\ldots) this question is asking us to find an (x) such that (a+arx+ar^2x^2+ar^3x^3+\ldots=T_3(x)=-\frac54)

solid kilnBOT
#

PajamaMamaLlama

modern spear
#

ah

#

so would r be (x/5) ?

#

.solved

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @modern spear

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

random tapir
trim joltBOT
random tapir
#

help

#

.stop

#

.solved

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @random tapir

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

daring bough
trim joltBOT
daring bough
#

Exercice 2 n3.a

#

J'ai trouvé x= 0,47 y=0,46 et z= 0,07 jsp si c'est correct

trim joltBOT
#

@daring bough Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#

@daring bough Has your question been resolved?

daring bough
#

<@&286206848099549185>

nova spire
daring bough
#

Celle la

#

Mais enft j'ai trouvé un résultat a cette question mais on me dit c'est pas bon

#

Surtout qu'il y a marqué l'ensemble des solutions

clear cloud
#

Quoique

daring bough
#

Comment je fais pour savoir si il y en a plusieurs

daring bough
#

De

clear cloud
#

Comment tu as eu ça

#

Ah tu as juste donné à la machine

daring bough
#

Non

#

J'ai fais

#

Jsp si t'arrivera a me relire 🥲

clear cloud
#

Ça me paraît correct oui

daring bough
#

Mais deepseek me sors un autre résultat

#

C'est bizarre

clear cloud
#

Qu'est ce qu'il dit

daring bough
#

Il me sors ča

clear cloud
#

Bah il manque une ligne non?

daring bough
#

Mais il a dis on peut l enlevé elle sers a rien

#

En gros

#

Mais juste le soucis c'est on me dit déterminer l'ensemble des équations

clear cloud
#

Mouais, j'ai x = 1763/3745

#

y comme toi

#

z = 54/749

#

Donc ouais

#

!nogpt

trim joltBOT
#

Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).

daring bough
#

Donc ma réponse est bonne?

clear cloud
#

Avec cette matrice oui

daring bough
#

La matrice t oui

#

Mais dcp il y a qu'une solution ?

clear cloud
#

Ce qui paraît assez normale

daring bough
#

J'avoue ça serait bizarre d avoir plusieur x

#

Fin ça voudrai dire qu on a pas la même probabilité

#

Avec la même matrice de transition

#

J'écris en fraction ou en arrondi ?

clear cloud
#

Ça peut se justifier avec de la géométrie dans l'espace qu'il y a qu'une solution dailleurs

clear cloud
daring bough
#

Daccc

clear cloud
#

Genre intersections de trois plans c'est un point ou vide

daring bough
#

Je crois qu'on l'a pas encore vue ça

#

Mais la toute dernière question j'ai pas compris ce qu'on nous demandait

#

Normalement c'est bon

#

Manque que la dernière question

clear cloud
#

C'est une interprétation d'une solution en particulier

#

alors x, y ou z ?

daring bough
#

X c'est les abeilles essaiment

#

Y les abeilles font du miel

#

Et z elles contractent une maladie

clear cloud
#

Et il demande quoi eux ?

clear cloud
daring bough
#

Mais les matrices et les plans c'est pas pareil

clear cloud
#

Alors non, parcontre le système que tu résoud si

#

Tu as quatre eqn de plans la

daring bough
daring bough
#

Mais on se complique la vie

#

Y

clear cloud
#

Mais il y a pas besoin

daring bough
#

Oui t'as raison

clear cloud
daring bough
#

Mais enft jsp si c'est vraiment ça

#

Fin je crois

#

Normalement

clear cloud
#

Je viens à peine de vérifier P je suis une fraude mais normalement elle est correcte

daring bough
#

😭 tkttt

#

Normalement

#

Bah en plus la calculatrice donne ça

#

Donc c'est bon

clear cloud
# daring bough Mais enft jsp si c'est vraiment ça

Enfaite, ce que tu as trouvé dans ton système c'est ta distribution invariante et c'est dans le nom, ça bouge pas. Donc la proportion sur le long terme c'est la proba que tu as trouvé pour y associé, donc la val de y

daring bough
#

La proportion c'est 45,714%

clear cloud
#

Ça me paraît bon

daring bough
#

Mais j'ai pas compris pk deepseek trouve autre chose

clear cloud
#

Pour l'instant, considère les comme des élèves qui passent à l'oral sans connaître le sujet et qui brodent en regardant le diapo

#

Ça paraît correct mais dans les faits ils disent des bêtises

#

Et en plus comme c'est boîte noir (tu sais pas vraiment comment il fait) bah c'est compliqué d'avoir un vrai regard

daring bough
#

Bonne comparaison 🥲

#

Bon bah je pense avoir terminé sauf si j'ai fais une faute

clear cloud
#

D'ailleurs

clear cloud
daring bough
#

Comment ça

clear cloud
#

Enfaite

#

Si ta matrice de transition ne contient pas de 0

daring bough
#

A oui

#

Ça oui

#

Mais c'était la question 2

clear cloud
#

Alors la suite de matrices lignes convergent vers la solution de ton système qui est unique

daring bough
#

C'était la question 2

clear cloud
#

Ah ok

#

Mais ducoup cette propriété assure l'unicité

#

Comme tu te demandais

daring bough
#

Stv je peut te montrer ce que j'avais marqué

#

Dacc

clear cloud
#

Non j'pense que c'est ok ça

daring bough
#

Dacc

#

Sinon une autre question

clear cloud
#

Oui

daring bough
#

Mais enft c'est sur le grand oral

clear cloud
#

Dis moi

daring bough
#

En maths dcp

#

C'est compliqué ou pas a expliqué car il y aura quelqu'un qui connait pas grands chose en maths

#

Comment faire pour qu'elle comprenne sans qu'on puisse écrire

clear cloud
#

C'est quoi ton sujet ?

#

Ça depends beaucoup du sujet

daring bough
#

Fin moi en théorie j'ai comment peut t'on modélisé l evolution de population/ maledie etc grace au maths

#

Et dcp j'avais pris les équations différentiel

clear cloud
#

Pcq dans tout les cas tu as le droit et c'est fortement conseillé à un support ou tu peux leur marquer des trucs et leur montrer

daring bough
clear cloud
#

Choisir ?

daring bough
#

Bah on peut pas tout mettre

clear cloud
#

Bah c'est des graphique majoritairement

#

Pour le coup l'oral tu le fais rigoureusement mais sans trop vraiment rentrer dans les détails super précis et l'idée c'est que tu "donnes" des questions à te poser

daring bough
#

Mais juste j'ai peur un peu d'être trop vague ou trop precis

clear cloud
#

Bah ils te poseront des questions dessus

#

Et si tu réponds correctement c'est tant mieux

nova spire
#

Théorème de Perron Frobenius: 1 est valeur propre simple

#

mais bon on l'a pas

clear cloud
#

Si seulement tu l'avais

daring bough
#

Faut anticiper les question

nova spire
#

Enfin c'est facile à voir avec la similarité aussi

nova spire
#

on a une matrice de transition stochastique

#

donc somme des lignes = 1

#

donc 1 valeur propre

daring bough
#

Oui je suis d'accord

clear cloud
nova spire
daring bough
#

Je vois pas?

nova spire
#

$T \begin{pmatrix}1\1\1\end{pmatrix} =$ ?

solid kilnBOT
#

rafilou is not not born in 2003

nova spire
#

Avec le fait que la somme des lignes de T ça fait 1...

#

c'est rapide

daring bough
#

Oui?

#

A ok

#

Mais tkt pas j'ai fini

nova spire
#

PT = P c'est une affaire légèrement différente

#

P ce sera pas un multiple de (1 1 1)

#

parce que là c'est plutôt les vecteurs lignes qu'on regarde

#

et pas colonnes

daring bough
#

Oui mais c'est une matrice ligne

nova spire
#

Mais T est semblable à sa transposée

#

encore un résultat que je sens que tu connais pas

#

bref

#

PT = P a des solutions non nulles

clear cloud
# daring bough Faut anticiper les question

Ils sont pas forcément expert non plus, et reviennent sur des points que tu as abordé, saches que si il te parle d'un truc un peu plus loin, c'est que tout ce que tu as dit était très bien

#

Et oui le "jury innocent" aura forcément des questions moins avancé que le professeur dont c'est la matière

daring bough
#

Merci

#

J'espère que j'y arriverai

clear cloud
#

Parcontre verlhust est extrêmement pris comme sujet

#

Afaik

daring bough
#

Afaik??

clear cloud
#

As far as i know

daring bough
#

Ah je croyais que c'était quelqu'un...

clear cloud
#

Ducoup les profs de maths sont habitués à le voir et ça peut être plus compliqué pour toi

#

Enfin c'est comme ça que je le vois

daring bough
#

Mais après tout les mathématicien sont connus

clear cloud
#

Ouais mais au niveau lycée il y en a des plus connus que d'autre

#

Et pour le GO ça se bouscule pas

daring bough
#

C'est grave ???

clear cloud
#

Non

daring bough
#

Après sinon la prof pourra me dire ce qu'elle en pense

#

Je pense

clear cloud
#

Si tu as l'occasion oui c'est le mieux

daring bough
#

D'acc

clear cloud
#

Après c'est beaucoup pour voir si tu es à l'aise à l'oral

daring bough
#

Oui cv je me débrouille

clear cloud
#

Connaît bien ton sujet et c'est tranquille

#

Puis en plus c'est une chance sur deux

#

Soit l'un soit l'autre

#

Sinon le programme de spe normal c'est ok ?

daring bough
#

Normalement oui

#

Juste les équations différentiel il y a des trucs un peu bizarre faut que je m entraine dessus

#

Primitiver aussi

clear cloud
#

Ok, en vrai spam les anciens sujets de bac

daring bough
clear cloud
daring bough
#

Apres il y a les intégral on a pas vue

daring bough
clear cloud
clear cloud
#

Ouais sur l'apmep

#

2023 peut être ou 2022

daring bough
#

Dacc je vais voir

#

La faut que je fasse ma géographie

#

Mais c'est vrai que les intégrales c'est la partie la plus dure?

clear cloud
#

Ça reste toujours le même type d'exercice, si tu connais les propriétés et que tu t'entraîne assez c'est tranquille

daring bough
#

J'avoue c'est ce que j'ai fais pour le bac blanc en maths et physique

#

Des exo en boucle pour comprendre

#

Ča a marché

clear cloud
#

Le bac c'est pareil, il change pas fondamentalement des exos que tu fais en cours

daring bough
#

Je trouve c'est plus dure

clear cloud
#

Le bac ?

daring bough
#

Oio certain truc

#

Oui

#

Fin sauf les probabilités c'est super simple

clear cloud
#

Il y a encore tchebychev ?

daring bough
#

Non

#

Je crois pas

clear cloud
#

Pas plus mal

daring bough
#

Sûrement

#

Bref je vais pas t'embêter plus que ça 😅

clear cloud
#

Ouah tkt hein, tu fermes le truc quand tu veux

clear cloud
daring bough
#

On vien juste de commencer qussi

#

Aussi

#

Peut être on verra plus de chose

clear cloud
#

Ouais mais ça c'est des trucs de matrices que tu auras pas en terminale je pense

daring bough
#

Jsp

#

Il reste que 1 mois après

clear cloud
#

Tant que ça ?

daring bough
#

Bah on va bientot être en juin

#

Avec le bac

clear cloud
#

C'est vrai ça

#

Tu fais quoi en géographie?

daring bough
#

L Union Européenne 😅

#

Pk ça supprime?

#

????

#

Ça veut pas

clear cloud
#

De quoi ?

#

Ahhh

#

Mdr

daring bough
#

Sinon je vais etre pas a jour

clear cloud
#

Je sais

daring bough
#

Pk le mots supprime?

#

Retar

clear cloud
#

Le mot que tu veut marquer est une insulte en anglais

daring bough
#

Retardé oui

#

A ok je vois

#

Et toi t'es en vacances ?

clear cloud
#

Les vacances dans le superieur kekw

daring bough
#

Ah 🥲

#

J'ai l'impression que dans le supérieur on a plus de vie

clear cloud
#

Juste moins de vacances

#

En université au moins

daring bough
#

J'avais prévu d'aller en prepa on dirait que j'aurai plus de vie

daring bough
#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @daring bough

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

topaz musk
trim joltBOT
topaz musk
#

how come for part A we dont add 20 ??

#

wait i got it

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @topaz musk

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

urban copper
trim joltBOT
urban copper
#

(-3,1,3) - (0,-1,1) = (-3,2,2)

#

,, \mathbb{L}_1 : (x,y,z) = \lambda(-3,2,2) + (-3,1,3) \ \mathbb{L}_2 : (x,y,z) = \lambda(-3,2,2) + (2,-3,-1) \ \mathbb{L}_3 : (x,y,z) = \lambda(1,0,-1) + (0,1,-1)

solid kilnBOT
#

938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71

urban copper
#

,, \mathbb{L}_1 \cap \mathbb{L}_2 = \emptyset

solid kilnBOT
#

938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71

urban copper
#

because they are parallel and not the same line

#

for L1 n L3 we have

#

i) -3x - 3 = y
ii) 2x + 1 = 1
iii) 2x + 3 = -y - 1

#

from ii) we have 2x = 0 ==> x = 0

#

there is no intersection between L1 and L3 either because we get an absurd

#

for L2 n L3 we have

#

i) -3x + 2 = y
ii) 2x - 3 = 1
iii) 2x -1 = -y - 1

#

from 2 we get 2x = 4 ==> x = 2

#

from 1 we get -6 + 2 = y ==> -4 = y

#

so there is an intersection

#

and it is a point I think

#

L2 n L3 = 2(-3,2,2) + (2,-3,-1) = (-6,4,4) + (2,-3,-1) = (-4,1,3)

#

-4(1,0,-1) + (0,1,-1) = (-4,0,4) + (0,1,-1) = (-4,1,3)

trim joltBOT
#

@urban copper Has your question been resolved?

urban copper
#

someone help for fucks sake

trim joltBOT
#

@urban copper Has your question been resolved?

cyan frost
urban copper
solid kilnBOT
#

Waes (Wires)

cyan frost
#

thanks

#

@pseudo goblet

#

what do you need help on

urban copper
#

@pseudo goblet can I get some help

urban copper
leaden nacelle
#

you want to find the line perpendicular to L that goes through P

#

that way all conditions are met

urban copper
#

can you elaborate

leaden nacelle
#

you are given a line L

#

and a point P

#

and conditions for L'

#

the third condition is that L' is perpendicular to L

urban copper
leaden nacelle
#

the second condition is that P is part of L'

#

and the first condition is that L and L' intersect

urban copper
#

yeah L' needs to pass through P

#

(1,-1,1) - (-5,7,4) = (6,-8,-3)

#

,w (6,-8,-3)x(-1,1,3)

solid kilnBOT
leaden nacelle
#

$\mathbb{L}' : \lambda (a, b, c) + (d, e, f)$ where for some $\lambda_1$, $\mathbb{L}'(\lambda_1) = P$

solid kilnBOT
#

Katharine

urban copper
#

do you follow

leaden nacelle
#

i'm not sure i follow your reasoning

urban copper
#

we know L' passes through P

#

and we know L' intersects L

#

one point that is in L is (0,-1,1)

#

if we subtract them we get a vector that is in L

#

maybe I am mistaken doe

#

for get it, is stupid

leaden nacelle
#

how would you go about finding a vector that is perpendicular to a line

urban copper
#

I am mistaken, forget it

leaden nacelle
#

Seperate from what you did before

#

we need to find the plane that is perpendicular to L because L' lies in that plane

urban copper
#

(x,y,z).(-1,1,3) = 0
use dot product we get a plane of vectors orthogonal to the direction vector of L

#

-x + y + 3z = 0

#

now find the intersection between L and this plane I guess, idk

leaden nacelle
#

We can constrain this plane further

#

as P needs to lie in it

urban copper
#

?

urban copper
#

WTF are you talking about

leaden nacelle
#

You've given the plane perpendicular to L going through the origin

#

but is that the correct one?

urban copper
leaden nacelle
#

There are technically infinite planes perpendicular to the line L

urban copper
#

ok

leaden nacelle
#

the one you've given is the one that goes through the origin

#

(0, 0, 0)

urban copper
#

Ax + Bx + Cz + D = 0
Ax + Bx + Cz = -D

leaden nacelle
#

you've put D to 0

urban copper
#

ok so I think I get what you mean

#

-x + y + 3z + D = 0
P = (-5,7,4)
5 + 7 + 12 = -D
12 + 12 = -D
24 = -D
-24 = D

leaden nacelle
#

yes

#

so now we know the exact plane in which L' lies

urban copper
#

-x + y + 3z - 24= 0
-x + y + 3z = 24

urban copper
#

now find the intersection of L with this plane, no?

#

I havent checked with GPT what does AI say

lime sphinx
leaden nacelle
#

thas nice

urban copper
#

what is M

#

midpoint

lime sphinx
#

nope but we want to get M to specify L’

urban copper
#

M is (0,-1,1)

lime sphinx
urban copper
#

ohh

#

right

#

(x,y,z) = (-k, k-1, 3k + 1)
-x + y + 3z = 24
k + k -1 + 3(3k+1) = 24

#

2k-1+9k+3 = 24
11k+2 = 24
11k = 22
k = 2

#

(x,y,z) = (-2, 2-1, 6 + 1) = (-2,1,7)

#

so M = (-2,1,7)

#

now you want me to find PM x the normal of the plane

#

?

#

or we are done?

lime sphinx
#

yeah PM is a vector in the plane normal to L but containing P and it will specify L’

lime sphinx
urban copper
#

lets verify after we find L'

urban copper
#

wtf you mean?

lime sphinx
urban copper
#

what idea?

#

we did some stuf with kat aswell

#

we did a BUNCH of stuff lmfao

lime sphinx
#

get the normal plane contaning P then find M then construct L’

#

that’s the chain of ideas to construct L’

urban copper
#

what M did you got?

#

doesnt matter, we will verify later lmfao

#

my M = (-2,1,7)

urban copper
#

I got the plane containing P

#

-x + y + 3z = 24

#

P = (-5,7,4)

#

just find PM x N

N being the normal of the plane

#

no PM is already the direction of L'

#

we dont need cross product

#

so we can use the vector PM as the direction vector of L' and use either P or M as one of the points for the parametric equation of the line L'

lime sphinx
#

bingo

urban copper
#

OK

#

this exercises are always like this crap

lime sphinx
#

at least this one is in R^3

urban copper
#

is it possible in R4 or Rn to have an exercise like this or wdym