#help-38
1 messages · Page 219 of 1
🤔
the root test says that if the limsup |a_n|^(1/n) < 1 then the series converges absolutely
diverges if it’s > 1
yes
no information if it equals 1
ratio test would be $\limsup \biggr|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\biggr| < 1$
knief
for absolute convergence
and liminf > 1
for divergence
so in this example you can just break this up into even/odd n and use the root test to show that the limsup is 1/2 so it’s absolutely convergent but using the ratio test after splitting even and odd n youd get 1/8 for liminf and 2 for limsup
so limsup is not less than 1 and liminf is not greater than 1
no information
but in most normal looking series you come across it would probably just come down to what’s more convenient to use
and it wouldn’t make a difference
that is so interesting. thank you for showing me this example!
like when the limits both exist for the ratio and root i don’t think it makes a difference
you’re welcome
Closed by @dusky thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to ask about scalar projection. Im not sure i understand how it works. I understand that scalar projection is to show how much object is in front of you or behind you, i know it returns a single number and if number is positive its in front of you and if negative is behind you. Im just curious cant this be done by getting magnitude/distance between 2 vectors to game same thing?
well a projection is a way to get the component of one vector in the direction of another vector
what does that mean, can it be simplified a bit
so in this example we are interested in the projection of y onto x
the vector projection of y onto x is the purple vector
the scalar projection of y onto x is the magnitude of that projection with a sign, being positive if it points in the direction of x and negative if it points in the opposite direction
so if x is "forward", then it is positive if y points "ahead" and negative if y points "behind"
With my understanding that scalar projection returns a single number, which means its not a vector. Its just confusing for me.
It sounds simple, its magnitude between 2 vectors, so the key difference is that we know if its forward or behind?
But not sure how the distance is correct if the x line is straight and its not poining straight to y? Its like never reaches the y
Is it just showing how far ahead or behind it is rather showing the distance between 2 objects?
because for me it just seems that these both shows magnitude but in a sense its different and magnitude for me what is the distance directly from one object to another
magnitude can't be negative, in this case it just shows the distance
(this is because magnitude is calculated via pythagoras' theorem, which always gives a positive number)
while a scalar projection uses a frame of reference that can have negative values
ok but does scalar projection shows the magnitude directly between 2 object or just how far ahead or behind its is in the directions they facing?
scalar doesn't show the magnitude of the distance vector, no
Ok but what if happens when the scalar projections gets used on this case?
the distance clearly is not 0 but would the product be 0?
the scalar projection would be 0
it would not be either ahead or behind it
the magnitude of the distance vector would not be 0
but the guides i read states that scalar projections shows the distance betwen 2 object, so in this case it only shows how far ahead or behind it is and not direct distance between 2 of them
it is not totally correct in telling the distance between 2 objects
with 2 scalar projections (like x and y axis) you can calculate the distance between 2 objects
but a scalar projection alone without any other information does not really show the distance between two objects unless they are aligned along the projection axis
Ok so i understand there is 2 types of magnitudes?
not quite
the magnitude of the distance vector is just "how long the vector is"
but you can also express vectors if you have a frame of reference
like a x and y axis
wait isint magnitue is a length between 2 vectors and its the same? magnitue == distance
in this particular case yes
it's the distance between the tail and the head of a vector if you want to see it that way
but vectors aren't always used for distances
i understand that, im just a bit confused.
So scalar projection shows what?
have you worked with points in x and y axis before?
I understand the x and y axis i just dont understand the concept of the scalar projection.
it's like the x and y coordinates of the object
you project the object along one axis
So it show magnitude only perpendicular to the 2 objects?
kind of, but it could be negative
so it cant be parallel?
you always have a way to find a perpendicular from a point to a line
I know that there is math to found all solutions to the problems. Im just confused on the rules that follow scalar projection
this is basically scalar projection
P_y is projection of P along the y axis, and P_x is the projection along the x axis
it can be confusing because you could rotate the x and y axis but scalar projection requires a frame of reference
what, i never seen 2 projections
the whole definition of scalar projection just doesnt make sense anymore
That looks more like Vector Projection
scalar projection is a projection onto another vector
i forgot to put the arrows on x and y
my bad
Simply saying scalar projection is like 90 degree shadow and result is the distance between the one vector and where the shadow projected stops
if the shadow is perpendicularly to where you are projecting, yes
isint it always perpendicular?
it usually depends on where you shine the light from but logically speaking yes it is perpendicular
i just thought of that , so it can come into play later when i learn the degree of which shadow is casted
it does
Thanks a lot for struggling with me
no prob
!close
.close
Closed by @grand wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This week i learned propagation of errors, absolute uncertainty and etc. I would like to ask if you guys could check if i did this question right
@valid hamlet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! can anyone help me spot my mistake
im stuck :(
oh, the E corner is the bottom right corner of the yellow square
the translator messed it up
Oh ok then ignore what I said
ohh okayy
Someone else would help you.
@formal jasper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, could someone please help me with this exercise?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
yeah what step are you on man?
ok
i solved the inequality by the method <=-3 and => 3, and then i solved it as a rational inequality in both cases, and i got [-6/5,-1/2)U(-1/2,0]
but i dont know if it is ok
and the answer doesnt match
what do you mean?
which answer did you get?
in the first case ( => 3) i got [-6/5,-1/2) and in the second one (<=-3) i got (-1/2,0]
i thought it was option 1 or 3 but it doesnt match
idk if i did something wrong
are you willing to share your notes so that we can see your attempt to solve the exercise?
okay, give me a sec
and where is the zero in -1/2
isn't it supposed to be -1/2,0?
Look my notes btw
lol i sent it in 144p
im sorry, its my phone
it's correct
[-6/5,-1/2)U(-1/2,0] and [-6/5,0]-{-1/2} are the same cause you subtract -1/2 from the range, since you cannot include it
yes that is correct
ohh i got it
yes yes
thank you man
so its option 3
perfect
yes
@dreamy pewter Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dreamy pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trying to determine if this converges or not
to start, we check for absolute convergence
so we check $\sum \frac{ \sqrt{n}}{n+1}$ for convergence
What a wonderful world !
You don't need to check for absolute convergence
An alternating series is convergent if it's decreasing (in abs, and the sequence converges to 0)
so this works too, I suppose
This series is not absolutely convergent btw
we still might want to distinguish absolute vs conditional though
Which is why I mentioned divergence test
Yup
the limit of a_n diverges to infty
does it?
no
a_n itself does not approach infty
or a comparision would work then
sqrt(n)/(n+1) behaves roughly as 1/sqrt(n)
$\frac{1}{n+1}< \frac{ \sqrt{n}}{n+1}$
What a wonderful world !
As the harmonic series diverges , so does this
for pretty much all algebraic functions the limit comparison test is the most straightforward method
This next
Which wins, exponential growth or cubic growth?
Or I guess really the question should be exponential growth or quartic growth (because the denominator needs to be more than one exponent bigger to converge)
My first thought was to write 5^n as a power series , but we haven't done power series in class yet
root test should work, no?
that or the ratio test
ratio may be easier here
$\lim_{n \to \infty} 5 \frac{n^3}{(n+1)^3}$
What a wonderful world !
the limit is 5, which is greater than 1, thus it diverges
mmm
can you show your work and the exact wording of the test you applied
cause i think you may have gotten some things backwards.
$\frac{ (n+1)^3/5^{n+1} }{ n^3/5^n}$
What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Ann
this is what you should've had
yea
yes
do you know the spirit of the ratio test?
imo it's as important (if not more so) as knowing its literal statement
Yea, it's a pseudo-GP test basically
We are approximating it as a GP
I'd like to solve a couple more problems, I'll post 'em here?
Root test
so $\lim_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n] {a_n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n^2+1}{2n^2+1} =\frac{1}{2}<1 \implies \text{ convergence }$
What a wonderful world !
This works?
one more question
This series can be re-wriiten as $\sum a_n + \frac{a_n}{n}$
What a wonderful world !
$a_n$ converges, so we just have to show $\sum \frac{a_n}{n}$ converges
What a wonderful world !
Can I have a hint
A comparison test, will likely not work here
or it may actually
$a_n< \frac{1}{n^p} \text{ for some p ≥2 , thus } a_n/n< 1/n^{p+1}$, which converges, and we're done
What a wonderful world !
yea, probably wrong
for sufficently large n
okay, I'm gong insame
am I not
$\abs{a_n/n}< {a_n}$, $\abs{a_n}$ converges, so $\abs{a_n/n}$ converges too, thus $a_n/n$ converges
What a wonderful world !
.close
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I apply mod 10 here
I tried to do it separately but i got -7?
2^23^24 mod 10 is 2
9^24^23 mod 10 is 1
2-1 = 1
well none of these answers could POSSIBLY be correct because you are subtracting even minus odd
this much you can see even without any calculations
the number will be odd and so end in an odd digit, so there is no correct option
how did 2 and 1 result in -7 though
assuming you got that correct (which it looks like you did), the answer would be 1.
thanks ann
Power of any even number would be even? And power of odd number will be odd always?
Yes it is
+close
it's .
.close
@lean kraken Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lean kraken
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i get e ?
Yep its 60
Isosceles truanglw?
no
Oki
look closer
Mm not sure
Ohh angles on a straight line?
yes
yes
Oo ok so its 20
How do we know triangle ACE is not a isoscelec triangle
Incase i accidentally take it as a isosceles triangle?
because its not stated anywhere?
Ohh oki
and you shouldnt randomly assume stuff
Closed by @full wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the formula for vertical asymptote?
depends but think of it as a abscissa or ordinate where the function or curve diverges to infinity
chatgpt didn't help me
for example, $y=\frac{1}{x-a}$ has vertical asymptote at $x=a$ because the functiob diverges to $\pm \infty$ there
I mean like I have the equation of x=1 is vertical asymptote of the graphic f:(1, Infinite)->R, f(x)=2x/(x-1)
parabolicinsanity
yeah, so?
Shouldn't ne a limit? Like />?
i mean, yeah i guess but what i meant to say was to be taken more as intuition
Like yhis

what
i mean sure
if $\abs{\lim_{x\to a^{\pm}}f(x)}=\infty$ then there's a vertical asymptote
parabolicinsanity
yeah so there's an asymptote there 
And.... How do I find it?
literally find the point where there is divergence to infinity
thats all
thats what an asymptote is
so in that problem the asymptote is x=1
Closed by @frosty nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Cn someone help me with this
Can someone explain it to me cus i cant understand it
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
This is the thing that has kept you up at night all week! That darn unit circle! So many roots and fractions and pies, how will you get it all in your head? Actually it's super easy to memorize the unit circle if you know a few tricks, so check this out and rest easy tonight!
Watch the whole Mathematics playlist: http://bit.ly/ProfDaveMath
Cla...
This trigonometry tutorial video explains the unit circle and the basics of how to memorize it. It provides the angles in radians and degrees and shows you how to evaluate sin cos and tan.
Trigonometry Final Exam Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAsbx4TEnL0
Trigonometry - Free Formula Sheet:
https://www.video-tutor.net/for...
This one is better
No need to watch the whole video
@wraith hinge
Is there something you specifically you don't understand about it? otherwise your probably better off just watching the videos.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm going over
Ellipses
In class
And honestly I don't know what the fuck the teacher's talking about
I'm super confused
Does someone have any reccomendations for this
I am on calculus if that helps?
Like any videos or pages to check info about this specifically... maybe? I dunno I am lost
Or Hell just an explanation of what they did would be thankful
seems like deriving the standard form where the center is (0,0)
Which one is the standard form here? I think I passed this previously but I'm kinda overwhelmed and stuff is not coming up
$\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=1$
yoboiqimmah
does this look familiar ? @livid bolt
yep they just deriving this form where a>b
What do you mean with this?
Deriving the equation of an ellipse from the property of each point being the same total distance from the two foci.
Used as an example of manipulating equations with square roots.
Neat
Gonna close for now since I have more classes and need to watch and understand this anyways
Gonna pop up later again
.close
Closed by @livid bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'd like to test this for convergence
we can use the divergence test
nvm
bad idea
root test
$\frac{ \sqrt[n]{n!}}{e^n}< \frac{n!}{e^n}$
What a wonderful world !
This doesn't work either
you could do that
hmm
what about ratio test
I did consider that, lemme try it
$\frac{(n+1} e^{{(n+1)^2}}{e^{n^2}}$
What a wonderful world !
oops
$\frac{(n+1) e^{{(n+1)^2}}}{e^{n^2}}$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
yea, thanks
yea
check your exps then
What a wonderful world !
I then divide the num and denom by $e^{(n+1)^2}$
What a wonderful world !
What a wonderful world !
which is $\lim_{n \to \infty} (n+1) e^{-(2n+1)}$
What a wonderful world !
yeah
Thanks
This next
This is calling for a comparison test imo
or nvm, that won't work
I was thinking of comparing it with 1/√n
yeah, I realise, I'm thinking
when comparing against some series you always have to understand the convergence status of the reference series
and thus the direction of comparison that produces a conclusive result
I can probably sandwich it
if the reference series is convergent, then the only fruitful direction is yours <= ref
if the reference series is divergent, then the only fruitful direction is yours >= ref
proof?
the general term of your series does approach 0, but that does not a convergent series make
@worldly cargo hi, do you have any more insightful and valuable commentary to add?
any more? this is all so extremely relevant to this series question after all...
also, congrats rafilou
the entire expression becomes zero at infinity
welp wasn't fast enough to be my first, thanks eric
nsin(1/n) approaches 1?
comparing it to 1/n would still not be enough
If true, this would mean divergence
you can use it if you are OK with using falsehoods
okay, so no
I can multiply and divide by √n
?
I don't see much the relevance
lets pretend we are physicists for a moment. what would we do?
sin x / x limit..
sin(1/n)~1/n
there you go
and what would we get then?
so I compare it to 1/n^{3/2}
1/
good so now we know what we want to show
and clearly the key will be to rigorously compare sin(1/n) and 1/n
Even for a calc 2 course?
okay
a much easier solution is to say that sin(1/n) < 2/n
uh
just sin(1/n) <= 1/n
why the 2
I never wanna bother thinking about whether they intersect
I'm not saying that the 2/n is optimized
but depending on the level its much easier to argue
although I guess at calc 2 level it doesnt matter anymore
we had the same problem some months ago and werent able to show sin(x) < x yet iirc
yeah we do not need a strict comparison here
I would like to solve a few more problems
This is pretty easy $\frac{k \ln(k)}{(k+1^3)}< \frac{k^2}{(k+1)^3}$\
To show the bigger series converges, we use the ratio test \
$\lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{ (k+1)^2 (k+2)^3}{ k^2 \cdot (k+1)^3}$
What a wonderful world !
the limit is 1, so inconclusive
easy
inconclusive
i believe this is what is known in the industry as a flop face first
maybe you should not have bounded the logarithm so crudely
also once again
tell me: what kind of familiar behavior does the ratio test capture
it treats the series as a GP
no
ok then maybe trying to shoehorn ratio test is gonna be a bad idea
Well, then I want a comparison test, because the root test isn't going to be pleasent here
neither is the integral test
root test also captures GP-like behavior
anyway you're right that you want some kind of comparison
note that log(x) is dominated by any power function x^p as long as p > 0
yea
$\log(k) < k^{0.42069}$
Ann

so I can do somethiing like
p = 0.9999999999 is good
$k^{1.5}/(k+1)^3}$
What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yeah sure
now you have you justify why that one converges.
in the long run teh denom behaves as k^3
1/k^{1.5} converges
can you turn this into a rigorous comparison
or is this 'long run behavior' thing already acceptable in your class
no you wouldn't
and you should be able to tell me why you wouldn't
not least because we discussed it a mere fifteen minutes ago
Because it doesn't look much like a GP
k^{1.5}/(k+1)^3< k^{1.5}/k^3
that's what I'd do
is there a "quod licet Jovi non licet bovi" thing at your uni or is it agreed upon that what's good enough for your tutor is also good enough for you
yes, that's good.
now you have an honest to goodness p-series
Can I do a couple more
no, like can I get help with a few more
You're right, stupid question
I need something smaller than ln(n) for an effective comparison
like i want to comapre it with something bigger first to see if it converges
$(\log(n))^{\log(n)} = n^{\log\log(n)}$
Ann
yea
loglog(n) is quite the sluggish function but it does outgrow any constant, e.g. 2
hmm
I don't follow
when n is big enough then loglogn is bigger than 2
so it does converge
why?
as when n is big enough, it decreases faster than any n^p series
hmm, if this is wrong, I'm not too sure
ln(ln(n))>n
Honestly, is it fine if I do this later, just realised I have to read a few ethnographies for my exam this friday
I forgot about that exam
you may want to let n_0 be the number for which loglogn>2 and split the sum
@marsh forum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is my answer wrong
umm is it 49
are the 0s not correct
(x-0)^2 + (y+1)^2 = 49?
lol yea
Closed by @warm helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where should i start with this question
the second part of the question is confusing
note that a geometric series is always of the form (a+ar+ar^2+ar^3+\ldots) this question is asking us to find an (x) such that (a+arx+ar^2x^2+ar^3x^3+\ldots=T_3(x)=-\frac54)
PajamaMamaLlama
Closed by @modern spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @random tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@daring bough Has your question been resolved?
@daring bough Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
C'est quoi la matrice T que t'as trouvé ?
Celle la
Mais enft j'ai trouvé un résultat a cette question mais on me dit c'est pas bon
Surtout qu'il y a marqué l'ensemble des solutions
C'est pas pour autant qu'il y en a plusieurs si ?
Quoique
Bah jsp justement
Comment je fais pour savoir si il y en a plusieurs
Jpeux voir?
Ça me paraît correct oui
Qu'est ce qu'il dit
Bah il manque une ligne non?
Mais il a dis on peut l enlevé elle sers a rien
En gros
Mais juste le soucis c'est on me dit déterminer l'ensemble des équations
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
Donc ma réponse est bonne?
Avec cette matrice oui
Ce qui paraît assez normale
J'avoue ça serait bizarre d avoir plusieur x
Fin ça voudrai dire qu on a pas la même probabilité
Avec la même matrice de transition
J'écris en fraction ou en arrondi ?
Ça peut se justifier avec de la géométrie dans l'espace qu'il y a qu'une solution dailleurs
Les deux
Daccc
A bon?
Genre vecteur
Genre intersections de trois plans c'est un point ou vide
Je crois qu'on l'a pas encore vue ça
Mais la toute dernière question j'ai pas compris ce qu'on nous demandait
Normalement c'est bon
Manque que la dernière question
X c'est les abeilles essaiment
Y les abeilles font du miel
Et z elles contractent une maladie
Et il demande quoi eux ?
Au moins l'intersection de deux plans non ?
Oui??
Mais les matrices et les plans c'est pas pareil
Si l'on observe l essaim sur une période quelle proportion représente les années où cet essaim produit du miel
Donc faut regarder lequel?
Pas tant que ça, c'est deux phrases
Mais il y a pas besoin
Oui t'as raison
Ok
Je viens à peine de vérifier P je suis une fraude mais normalement elle est correcte
Enfaite, ce que tu as trouvé dans ton système c'est ta distribution invariante et c'est dans le nom, ça bouge pas. Donc la proportion sur le long terme c'est la proba que tu as trouvé pour y associé, donc la val de y
La proportion c'est 45,714%
Ça me paraît bon
Mais j'ai pas compris pk deepseek trouve autre chose
Pour l'instant, considère les comme des élèves qui passent à l'oral sans connaître le sujet et qui brodent en regardant le diapo
Ça paraît correct mais dans les faits ils disent des bêtises
Et en plus comme c'est boîte noir (tu sais pas vraiment comment il fait) bah c'est compliqué d'avoir un vrai regard
D'ailleurs
Tu as la propriété qui dit pourquoi ça marche ?
Alors la suite de matrices lignes convergent vers la solution de ton système qui est unique
Non j'pense que c'est ok ça
Oui
Mais enft c'est sur le grand oral
Dis moi
En maths dcp
C'est compliqué ou pas a expliqué car il y aura quelqu'un qui connait pas grands chose en maths
Comment faire pour qu'elle comprenne sans qu'on puisse écrire
Fin moi en théorie j'ai comment peut t'on modélisé l evolution de population/ maledie etc grace au maths
Et dcp j'avais pris les équations différentiel
Pcq dans tout les cas tu as le droit et c'est fortement conseillé à un support ou tu peux leur marquer des trucs et leur montrer
Ah verlhust
Oui mais faut choisir et jsp qu'est qui faut vrmt mettre
Choisir ?
Bah on peut pas tout mettre
Bah c'est des graphique majoritairement
Pour le coup l'oral tu le fais rigoureusement mais sans trop vraiment rentrer dans les détails super précis et l'idée c'est que tu "donnes" des questions à te poser
Mais juste j'ai peur un peu d'être trop vague ou trop precis
Bah ils te poseront des questions dessus
Et si tu réponds correctement c'est tant mieux
Si seulement tu l'avais
Mais ça c'est le problème
Faut anticiper les question
Enfin c'est facile à voir avec la similarité aussi
Pour?
on a une matrice de transition stochastique
donc somme des lignes = 1
donc 1 valeur propre
Oui je suis d'accord
¯_(ツ)_/¯
(vecteur propre colonne = (1 1 1))
Je vois pas?
$T \begin{pmatrix}1\1\1\end{pmatrix} =$ ?
rafilou is not not born in 2003
PT = P c'est une affaire légèrement différente
P ce sera pas un multiple de (1 1 1)
parce que là c'est plutôt les vecteurs lignes qu'on regarde
et pas colonnes
Oui mais c'est une matrice ligne
oui
Mais T est semblable à sa transposée
encore un résultat que je sens que tu connais pas
bref
PT = P a des solutions non nulles
Ils sont pas forcément expert non plus, et reviennent sur des points que tu as abordé, saches que si il te parle d'un truc un peu plus loin, c'est que tout ce que tu as dit était très bien
Et oui le "jury innocent" aura forcément des questions moins avancé que le professeur dont c'est la matière
Dacc mercu
Merci
J'espère que j'y arriverai
Afaik??
As far as i know
Ah je croyais que c'était quelqu'un...
Ducoup les profs de maths sont habitués à le voir et ça peut être plus compliqué pour toi
Enfin c'est comme ça que je le vois
Mais après tout les mathématicien sont connus
Ouais mais au niveau lycée il y en a des plus connus que d'autre
Et pour le GO ça se bouscule pas
C'est grave ???
Non
Si tu as l'occasion oui c'est le mieux
D'acc
Après c'est beaucoup pour voir si tu es à l'aise à l'oral
Oui cv je me débrouille
Connaît bien ton sujet et c'est tranquille
Puis en plus c'est une chance sur deux
Soit l'un soit l'autre
Sinon le programme de spe normal c'est ok ?
Normalement oui
Juste les équations différentiel il y a des trucs un peu bizarre faut que je m entraine dessus
Primitiver aussi
Ok, en vrai spam les anciens sujets de bac
Mais il y a pas les équations différentiel
Du style ?
Apres il y a les intégral on a pas vue
Fin il y a des choses que j'ai pas trop bien compris en cours att
Ah je me souviens d'un vilain sujet Asie avec des equa diff
A bon?
Dacc je vais voir
La faut que je fasse ma géographie
Mais c'est vrai que les intégrales c'est la partie la plus dure?
Ça reste toujours le même type d'exercice, si tu connais les propriétés et que tu t'entraîne assez c'est tranquille
J'avoue c'est ce que j'ai fais pour le bac blanc en maths et physique
Des exo en boucle pour comprendre
Ča a marché
Le bac c'est pareil, il change pas fondamentalement des exos que tu fais en cours
Je trouve c'est plus dure
Le bac ?
Il y a encore tchebychev ?
Pas plus mal
Ouah tkt hein, tu fermes le truc quand tu veux
C'est vrai que faire markov avec si peu c'est dommage
Ouais mais ça c'est des trucs de matrices que tu auras pas en terminale je pense
Tant que ça ?
Sinon je vais etre pas a jour
Je sais
Le mot que tu veut marquer est une insulte en anglais
Les vacances dans le superieur kekw
J'avais prévu d'aller en prepa on dirait que j'aurai plus de vie
.close
Closed by @daring bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @topaz musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(-3,1,3) - (0,-1,1) = (-3,2,2)
,, \mathbb{L}_1 : (x,y,z) = \lambda(-3,2,2) + (-3,1,3) \ \mathbb{L}_2 : (x,y,z) = \lambda(-3,2,2) + (2,-3,-1) \ \mathbb{L}_3 : (x,y,z) = \lambda(1,0,-1) + (0,1,-1)
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,, \mathbb{L}_1 \cap \mathbb{L}_2 = \emptyset
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
because they are parallel and not the same line
for L1 n L3 we have
i) -3x - 3 = y
ii) 2x + 1 = 1
iii) 2x + 3 = -y - 1
from ii) we have 2x = 0 ==> x = 0
there is no intersection between L1 and L3 either because we get an absurd
for L2 n L3 we have
i) -3x + 2 = y
ii) 2x - 3 = 1
iii) 2x -1 = -y - 1
from 2 we get 2x = 4 ==> x = 2
from 1 we get -6 + 2 = y ==> -4 = y
so there is an intersection
and it is a point I think
L2 n L3 = 2(-3,2,2) + (2,-3,-1) = (-6,4,4) + (2,-3,-1) = (-4,1,3)
-4(1,0,-1) + (0,1,-1) = (-4,0,4) + (0,1,-1) = (-4,1,3)
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
someone help for fucks sake
@urban copper Has your question been resolved?
could you translate this
Waes (Wires)
@pseudo goblet can I get some help
2
you want to find the line perpendicular to L that goes through P
that way all conditions are met
can you elaborate
you are given a line L
and a point P
and conditions for L'
the third condition is that L' is perpendicular to L
the second condition is that P is part of L'
and the first condition is that L and L' intersect
yeah L' needs to pass through P
(1,-1,1) - (-5,7,4) = (6,-8,-3)
,w (6,-8,-3)x(-1,1,3)
$\mathbb{L}' : \lambda (a, b, c) + (d, e, f)$ where for some $\lambda_1$, $\mathbb{L}'(\lambda_1) = P$
Katharine
do you follow
i'm not sure i follow your reasoning
we know L' passes through P
and we know L' intersects L
one point that is in L is (0,-1,1)
if we subtract them we get a vector that is in L
maybe I am mistaken doe
for get it, is stupid
how would you go about finding a vector that is perpendicular to a line
I am mistaken, forget it
I did a mistake
Seperate from what you did before
we need to find the plane that is perpendicular to L because L' lies in that plane
(x,y,z).(-1,1,3) = 0
use dot product we get a plane of vectors orthogonal to the direction vector of L
-x + y + 3z = 0
now find the intersection between L and this plane I guess, idk
yes, but I am stuck
?
You've given the plane perpendicular to L going through the origin
but is that the correct one?
wdym?
There are technically infinite planes perpendicular to the line L
ok
Ax + Bx + Cz + D = 0
Ax + Bx + Cz = -D
you've put D to 0
ok so I think I get what you mean
-x + y + 3z + D = 0
P = (-5,7,4)
5 + 7 + 12 = -D
12 + 12 = -D
24 = -D
-24 = D
-x + y + 3z - 24= 0
-x + y + 3z = 24
very interesting problem tho
now find the intersection of L with this plane, no?
I havent checked with GPT what does AI say
thas nice
nope but we want to get M to specify L’
M is (0,-1,1)
M is the intersection between the plane you just found and L
ohh
right
(x,y,z) = (-k, k-1, 3k + 1)
-x + y + 3z = 24
k + k -1 + 3(3k+1) = 24
2k-1+9k+3 = 24
11k+2 = 24
11k = 22
k = 2
(x,y,z) = (-2, 2-1, 6 + 1) = (-2,1,7)
so M = (-2,1,7)
now you want me to find PM x the normal of the plane
?
or we are done?
yeah PM is a vector in the plane normal to L but containing P and it will specify L’
modulo some verifications if you wish this should construct L’ with the desired properties
lets verify after we find L'
I got lost again
wtf you mean?
i haven’t verified your computations, but that should be the right idea to construct L’
get the normal plane contaning P then find M then construct L’
that’s the chain of ideas to construct L’
now what?
I got the plane containing P
-x + y + 3z = 24
P = (-5,7,4)
just find PM x N
N being the normal of the plane
no PM is already the direction of L'
we dont need cross product
so we can use the vector PM as the direction vector of L' and use either P or M as one of the points for the parametric equation of the line L'
bingo
at least this one is in R^3
?
is it possible in R4 or Rn to have an exercise like this or wdym