#help-38

1 messages · Page 183 of 1

uncut bough
#

Yea

uncut bough
#

But I’m thinking of just x^2 /2

empty orchid
#

now, lets take the base of the triangle (for 0<x<1) to be x

uncut bough
empty orchid
#

what is the area of the triangle in terms of x and y?

uncut bough
uncut bough
empty orchid
uncut bough
empty orchid
#

i guess that works.

uncut bough
#

Where to get X-x^2/2

empty orchid
uncut bough
#

Height is 1-x

#

And base is x ?

empty orchid
#

yeap

#

so u divide all that by 2 (A=ab/2)

uncut bough
empty orchid
#

yes

#

meknows i can integrate it normally

#

methinks why its not correct

uncut bough
#

What do you mean ?

empty orchid
uncut bough
#

Ohh okeyyy

empty orchid
#

meunderstand now.

#

@uncut bough think of it as trapezoid rather than triangle

#

let me show!

uncut bough
#

Aightt thanks

empty orchid
uncut bough
#

So y = 0 ?

empty orchid
#

we are analyzing $\int_0^x f(t)dt$, so $x$ is changing from $0<x<1$

solid kilnBOT
empty orchid
#

therefore the area will always be a trapezoid

#

unless x=1

empty orchid
#

yes it works perfectly

#

@uncut bough

uncut bough
#

Okey

empty orchid
#

sorry its like 2am over here

uncut bough
#

Let me try

#

Ohh yea

#

That workssss

#

Thank youu so muchhhh

#

Appreciate ittt

#

Thanks!!!

#

@empty orchid

empty orchid
uncut bough
#

Good night

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @uncut bough

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wraith hinge
#

Hi, this is a test because I am new here, and I am curious on the process works. Please help me with the following math problem: Solve for x:
\sqrt{x} = 4

wraith hinge
#

I am assuming for an easy stuff, the bot will show how solve it, and for the hard questions a human help 🙂

quick tusk
#

No bot, we're all humans

wraith hinge
#

hello are you real?

#

oh! wow

mental anchor
#

Humans help for all problems

wraith hinge
#

oh I didn't know this!

#

okay I will try and come up with some truly hard problems then 🙂

quick tusk
#

dead internet theory hitting hard huh

wraith hinge
#

lol. Well, the answer is 16

mental anchor
wraith hinge
#

thank you for your help 🙂

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @opaque narwhal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

brave rampart
trim joltBOT
brave rampart
#

help pls

#

what is the approach?

trim joltBOT
#

@brave rampart Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#

@brave rampart Has your question been resolved?

past widget
# brave rampart

Start with bounding: for any permutation of (1, 2, ..., n), the given expression 2n > n/1 + (n-1)/2 + ... + 1/n ≥ a_1 + a_2/2 + ... + a_n/n ≥ 1 + 1 + ... + 1 = n

#

perhaps that might give an insight

#

but since you're to count number of permutations in a closed form s_n, it might not helpmuch

#

||induction go brrrr||

brave rampart
#

can you show how to use the induction in this case

#

@past widget

trim joltBOT
#

@brave rampart Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

radiant portal
trim joltBOT
radiant portal
#

I think I know how to solve it but im just stuck on 1 thing

#

u = x^2 - 3

#

du = 2x dx

split chasm
#

du = 2x dx

radiant portal
#

To get rid of the x^3 do I do

#

u = x^2 - 3

#

u + 3 = x^2

#

sqrt(u + 3) = x

split chasm
#

no

#

split x^3 into
x *** x^2**
express the x^2 in terms of u
while you use the other x with dx and convert that to du

radiant portal
#

Ah yeye

#

Ok I think I can solve, thanks!

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @radiant portal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lethal vigil
#

Find the equation and length of common tangent to hyperbolas
[
\frac{x^2}{a^2} - \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1 \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{y^2}{a^2} - \frac{x^2}{b^2} = 1
]

solid kilnBOT
#

riddle

lethal vigil
#

,rotate

solid kilnBOT
lethal vigil
#

Got slope m=±1 of tangent

trim joltBOT
#

@lethal vigil Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

untold sage
#

Hey, im really lost about how to do these. I understand that the first one is supposed to use the stars and bars theorem but i dont know why i cant do 5^20 and i just dont know how to do b and c

vernal palm
#

is this the whole question?

#

@untold sage

#

and where did you get answers?

#

because it seems to be a D(n,k) question

naive otter
#

Or smthng else !

naive otter
#

Part b reads, at least 4 9v, so we can leave 4 places for 9 v and do 5^16, considering the places are identical.

trim joltBOT
#

@untold sage Has your question been resolved?

vernal palm
#

I don't think he's here anymore

dense breach
#

Order doesn't matter I assume

#

So 5^16 is too big

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

half marsh
trim joltBOT
naive otter
#

∞-∞ form

half marsh
#

which means?

naive otter
#

You just perform lcm

half marsh
#

lcm?

naive otter
#

I mean

#

(xlnx - x+1)/(x-1)lnx

half marsh
#

I did that but then i got stuck

#

wouldnt it be -1+x?

neon dirge
half marsh
#

omg

#

i wrote down the wrong function

naive otter
half marsh
#

i have x/1-x instead of x/x-1

neon dirge
#

k, but with 0/0 you can derive

half marsh
#

l'hopital?

neon dirge
#

sure try

half marsh
#

lim x-> 1+ ln(x)/(ln(x)+(x-1)/x)) ?

#

then i can plug in 1 so it will be 0/(0+1/1) = 0/1= 0?

#

wait no fuck

past widget
half marsh
past widget
#

even now would be fine

half marsh
#

aah okay

past widget
#

Let me write the expression for you

#

$L = \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{(1 + y)\ln (1 + y) - y}{y\ln (1 + y)}$

half marsh
#

huh

#

if x goes to 1 y will go to 2?

#

if x= y+1

#

omg

#

mb

#

i am so cooked atm

solid kilnBOT
past widget
#

nevermind cookie, do you get how to proceed from here?

half marsh
#

not sure let me try please

past widget
#

btw, remember $\lim_{y \to 0} \frac{\ln(1 + y)}{y} = 1$

solid kilnBOT
half marsh
#

oooh ye the special limit

#

i would have forgotten

half marsh
past widget
#

do you want to do L'hopital? 🥺

half marsh
#

i dont think so since u gave me that tip

#

but still

#

i have no idea then

past widget
#

sad okay go ahead, but even for using L'hopital, I'll suggest simplifying the denom at least

half marsh
#

so devide by y?

#

in the top and the bottom

hazy blaze
#

There is no reason not to do LHôptial.

past widget
#

yes rewrite ln(1 + y) as [ln(1 + y)/y] * y, the square bracket goes to 1

half marsh
#

wait let me take a screenshot of what i haven ow

covert spindle
half marsh
#

i can still do that and then split the limits?

past widget
#

there's no reason to even know or mention lhopital

half marsh
#

how do people see this so fast

#

i still dont see it

#

💀

past widget
#

np, you'll see it someday.

#

I hope

half marsh
#

I hope so too

#

so can you show me the step i must make?

past widget
#

wait I'll show

hazy blaze
past widget
#

$= \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{(1 + y)\ln (1 + y) - y}{y^2 \cancelto{1}{\frac{\ln (1 + y)}{y}}}$

solid kilnBOT
past widget
half marsh
#

ye i would have never ever done that in my entire life

past widget
#

why you learn limit properties T-T

#

lim L + lim K = lim (L + K) and stuff

half marsh
#

I knoww but i just didnt see that step

past widget
#

but you know the standard limit for ln(1 + y)/y

half marsh
#

let me write this down real quick and try to solve it then

half marsh
past widget
#

the only right step is to use that

#

and the (1 - cos x)/x² stuff

#

welp std. limits have their use depending on your indeterminate form

main sigil
#

wait where did cos come from

past widget
#

imagination

half marsh
#

our prof doesnt want us to memorize a lot

main sigil
#

introducing cos to this is crazy 💀

half marsh
#

so we only get little to use

half marsh
past widget
half marsh
#

no we just learned that this week

#

so it was more of a guess tbh

#

that i had to use it for these exercises

past widget
#

why do they even teach that

main sigil
#

it might be an intended way to do this exercise then

half marsh
#

anyways imma try to solve t now

#

hmm

past widget
#

okie then, after reducing the denom, you're free to use Lhopital

#

$= \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{\ln (1 + y) - y}{y^2} + \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{\ln(1+y)}{y}$

solid kilnBOT
past widget
#

you can use lhopital for the left part

half marsh
#

isnt l'hopital a nice thing :-:

#

it seems like you hate it

main sigil
#

in my unpopular opinion, you can also use lhop right at the start to avoid excessive manipulation

half marsh
main sigil
#

it's just expanding (1+y)ln(1+y) to ln(1+y) + yln(1+y) and then splitting the fraction

half marsh
#

aaah

#

i am cooked

past widget
#

$\frac{x\ln x - x + 1}{(x - 1)\ln x}$ hmm, you can just plug an alternative solution by using lhop on this

solid kilnBOT
past widget
#

no biggie cat_uwu

neon dirge
half marsh
#

wait

#

didnt u make a mistake?

past widget
#

wait, don't you mean a "xln x" on second num

half marsh
#

in the second one

neon dirge
#

oopsie

half marsh
#

how would you do it without l'hopital?

past widget
#

👀

half marsh
#

maybe split them?

#

ln(y+1)/y² - 1/y?

past widget
#

nope can't do that

half marsh
#

no that probably wrong

#

since 1/y wil bring us nowhere

neon dirge
#

updated

past widget
#

the limit properties state that lim h + lim g = lim(h + g) given both limits exist

half marsh
#

Hmmm

#

ye no idea

past widget
#

You'd probably not like it but one solution to that is by using Taylor series for e^x = 1 + x + x^2/2 + ..

half marsh
#

I only know that from math memes on tiktok

#

never ever seen taylor series

#

:-:

past widget
#

wait I went 4 steps ahead

half marsh
#

i dont know taylor series

past widget
#

Lhop it ✅

half marsh
#

that the only other way?

past widget
#

you want to do it purely without lhop?

half marsh
#

well i learn from other not easy methods

#

so if you have any tricks that are usefull

past widget
#

scratch that.. gimme a min

half marsh
#

ye okay ill just use l'hopital this is probably too advanced for now

#

thank you tho!

past widget
#

not really :c I just cannot remember the easier way to do it

half marsh
#

can you maybe help with another limit?

past widget
#

see ! you get rusty looking at lhop all day :c

half marsh
past widget
#

$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - x - 1}{x^2} = \frac{1}{2}$ was another standard integral back in the days :p

solid kilnBOT
past widget
half marsh
#

yes

#

1-1/2=1/2

#

had to do it twice right?

past widget
#

not really but it's alr

half marsh
#

Huh

past widget
#

$\frac{\ln(1+y) - y}{y^2} = \frac{\frac{1}{1+y} - 1}{2y} = \frac{1 - y - 1}{2y(1 + y)} = \frac{-y}{2y(1+y)}$

solid kilnBOT
past widget
#

and you cancel the y's get the -1/2

half marsh
#

oooh ye damn

#

gotta love limits

past widget
#

:p

#

So, ready for the alternate solution?

half marsh
#

i hope so

past widget
half marsh
#

seee

#

l'hop just makes the thinking part way less complicated

#

but tbh you wont learn lots of it

past widget
#

you had another question?

half marsh
#

yes

#

lemme get it

covert spindle
half marsh
#

can you read this?

past widget
#

yes

half marsh
#

perfect

#

i literally have no idea

#

first i thought maybe multiply by the opposite

past widget
#

won't suggest lhopping right away

half marsh
#

Noooo

past widget
#

should rationalize

half marsh
#

i wouldnt even dare to

half marsh
#

and also divide

past widget
#

$= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\tan x - \sin x}{2x^3}$

solid kilnBOT
half marsh
#

wow wait

#

Huh

past widget
#

the √(1 + tan x) + √(1 + sin x) -> 2 in denom

#

finite limits multiply rule

half marsh
#

oooh

#

okay now i get it

#

but now

past widget
#

now change tan x to sin / cos and viola, you get your limit

half marsh
#

imma try rq

past widget
#

$= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} \cdot \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1 - \cos x}{x^2}$

solid kilnBOT
half marsh
#

right side l'hopital?

#

left side special limit

past widget
#

can do eyeszoom right side was special limit, but you guys didn't do it so

#

btw 1 - cos x = 2sin²(x/2)

half marsh
#

aaah ye

#

i just thought of that no way

past widget
#

you're getting smarter :p

half marsh
#

it was sarcasm :(

#

one day!!!

#

but we dont have the right side as a special limit

#

so i guess i must do l'hopital then

#

wait i am not even allowed to

#

wait i am

#

mb

past widget
#

Hmm?

half marsh
#

answer 1/4?

past widget
half marsh
past widget
#

Waito

half marsh
#

wait i might know how to do it

past widget
#

$= \frac{1}{4} \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} \cdot \lim_{x \to 0} \cancelto{1}{(\frac{\sin (x/2)}{x/2})^2}$

#

Yep the 4 got sent out of space

half marsh
#

ye i am not allowed to do it like that

#

i must make sure the limit is sin(x)/x

#

so using substitution and stuff until it is in the standard form

solid kilnBOT
half marsh
#

i found a way

past widget
#

What about this?

#

Is this still not allowed?

past widget
#

There's no worries tho, you can L'Hopital, since it's a lhop exercise

half marsh
#

and then y= x/2

#

x-> 0 y->0

past widget
#

half marsh
#

what year are you in?

past widget
#

M graduating this yr

half marsh
#

Aaaah

#

makes sense

past widget
#

:p I used to be sharper before

half marsh
#

No way

past widget
#

All the algebra n stuff dulled it down monkey

half marsh
#

nooooo

#

i suppose u got to go now?

past widget
#

Obv coz practice

#

Not really, I'm around for a bit

half marsh
#

Ln both sides?

past widget
half marsh
#

Ln L = lim cos(x) ln(tan(x))?

past widget
#

Step 1. indeterminate form

#

?

half marsh
#

yes?

#

cuz

past widget
#

No, I'm asking which indeterminate form it is

half marsh
#

cos will be 0

#

oooh

#

infinte to the power of 0

#

right?

past widget
#

half marsh
#

okay luckily

past widget
#

Step 2. ln L = lim cos x ln(tan x) = 0 * inf

#

send cos to denom and lhop

half marsh
#

smart

#

we will have inf / inf

#

i love math

#

oh no

#

i am stuck again

#

how

#

what is the dy/dx of 1/cos(x)?

past widget
#

Don't know derivative of sec x ? :p thought so

#

Chain rule ✓

half marsh
#

we are not allowed to use those

#

only cos

#

sin

#

tan

#

and their inverses

past widget
#

Chain it

half marsh
#

aaah okay

#

so 1/sin²x?

past widget
#

-1/cos² * -sin

#

=_+ did you forget how to chain too

#

You diff wrt cos first

#

Then diff cos wrt x

half marsh
#

my brain just stops working

past widget
half marsh
#

so i will be left with lim x->0 tan(x)/sin(x)?

half marsh
past widget
half marsh
#

I am not allowed to use sec :-:

half marsh
past widget
past widget
#

Also, ln L = 0 => L = 1

half marsh
#

well at least i got that right

past widget
half marsh
#

but the l'hopital is just so ugly if your not allowed to use sec and stuff

#

so many brackets they confuse me

past widget
#

It's best to simplify as much as you can before lhop

half marsh
#

but i cant simplify ln(tan x) / 1/cos(x) right

past widget
#

half marsh
#

But then i will be left with such an ugly lim

#

look:

past widget
covert spindle
past widget
#

catking yes that's not ugly

half marsh
#

`huh

past widget
#

You've not seen ugly !

half marsh
#

this is!

past widget
#

That's just cot x cosec x

half marsh
#

not for me

past widget
#

Two words, not ugly

half marsh
#

it is if your not allowed to use them

#

okay ill just do this tomorrow

#

i am too cooked

#

anyways Arya

#

you been amazing help

#

thank you very very much

past widget
half marsh
#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @half marsh

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

molten comet
#

Hello

trim joltBOT
molten comet
#

Why is the x coming out of the integral?

empty orchid
boreal apex
#

All other variables besides the Integration variable are constant

empty orchid
#

so in this case, x is a constant here.

molten comet
#

Yeah so xtan(x) should come out, no?

#

Not just tan(x)

empty orchid
#

similar to how $\frac{\partial}{\partial y}xy=x$.

empty orchid
solid kilnBOT
boreal apex
#

You could take out both it doesn't really matter

molten comet
#

But they subbed in xy

#

I'm saying there's x missing in the final solution

empty orchid
#

?

molten comet
#

Or am I wrong

empty orchid
#

there is not, since it vanished in the u-sub.

molten comet
#

xtan(x)e^xy + ø_1(x) should be the final answer

#

Ohhh

#

Right

#

Must have cancelled with the du/dx = x

empty orchid
#

$\int xe^{xy}\partial y=\overbrace{\int e^udu}^{u=xy, \partial u=x\partial y}$

molten comet
#

Thanks!

empty orchid
#

oopsies

molten comet
#

I understand now it's fine haha

solid kilnBOT
molten comet
#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @molten comet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

craggy basin
#

what is concave up vs concave down again

craggy basin
#

i refuse to accept these are the proper terms for it TT

ionic pendant
#

sometimes concave up is called convex and concave down is called concave

craggy basin
#

idk why my teacher doesnt use those

ionic pendant
#

concave up vs down is pretty common in calculus courses

craggy basin
#

wouldnt concave up be concave and concave down be convex

craggy basin
#

conviced whoever created these terms never knew basic words in the dictionary

#

is this right?

zinc ginkgo
#

All look right yea

craggy basin
#

i cannot stand their use of concave

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @craggy basin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

knotty glacier
#

I need help with this problem

trim joltBOT
hidden dew
#

?

wraith hinge
tulip violet
#

<@&268886789983436800>

west sleet
#

Calculator

dull temple
#

yeah i can help you with that. bye.

knotty glacier
#

Oh sorry

#

Since they were g(x) and h(x) I thought they were different

knotty glacier
hidden dew
# knotty glacier

the only case where this has an x-intercept is if a=0
and 0 isn't positive constant so no x-intercept

wraith hinge
#

set h(x) = 0, and it should be evident that there's no x-intercepts.

knotty glacier
#

Oh ok

#

So if I were to graph it, it would be a horizontal line?

hidden dew
knotty glacier
#

No if I set h(x) = 0

#

And wouldn’t no x-int mean it’s a horizontal line?

hidden dew
knotty glacier
#

It’s ok

#

How do I write it out then? If not h(x) = 0

hidden dew
trim joltBOT
#

@knotty glacier Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

limpid pumice
#

Hello ,I can't find the mistake

trim joltBOT
#

@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?

limpid pumice
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

its divided by n and not m on the second line

trim joltBOT
#

@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#

@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?

cedar elk
#

Try to resolve it with a new blank paper, idk

trim joltBOT
#

@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

craggy basin
trim joltBOT
craggy basin
#

what did i do wrong

silver glade
#

looks right

craggy basin
#

i only got half points

south latch
#

my guess would be that the application doesn't like the vertices at x=0 and x=1

craggy basin
#

thats so dumb

south latch
#

tell your teacher you want to do math with pencil and paper.

craggy basin
#

i dont think hed allow that

south latch
#

outsourcing math homework to these 🦆 ing app companies is causing lethargicness and brainrot in math students

#

not as much as social media, but close

craggy basin
#

im really behind on math so im not really allowed to complain

south latch
#

and more anxiety for teachers than its worth

craggy basin
#

wasnt even allowed to be in the class TT

south latch
#

I think the app wanted you to draw a line segment from (-1,-2) to (2,1)

#

I dunno how you got those points at (0,-1) and (1,0)

craggy basin
#

i just was starting the graph at 0

#

they arent closed dot

south latch
#

the app doesn't know how to handle whatever you tried to do.

#

that's why math apps suck

mossy island
#

ah, pearson

craggy basin
#

idk im really overwhelmed with this math class and idk what to do TT

south latch
mossy island
#

they do

#

the whole app is bad

south latch
mossy island
#

probably need to discuss that 😭

craggy basin
#

i think so but i cant complain cause i wasnt allowed in this class and had to ask him to override it soooo yeah

south latch
#

you have the right to your own credit.

#

your teacher will be happy you brought it up because it means you are trying and validates their existence.

craggy basin
#

yeah but i litterally said i understand all the prerecs and i dont

south latch
mossy island
#

eh

#

ive had expections made for me before because i didnt meet the prerecs

#

just do okay and theyll trust you

craggy basin
#

idk if it makes sense but if i tell him im basically saying i lied to his face

south latch
craggy basin
#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @craggy basin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gray pebble
#

would this graph have 3 rel extrema or 4? i thought 4 bc at x=6 its und but still changes signs

trim joltBOT
#

@gray pebble Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#

@gray pebble Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#

@gray pebble Has your question been resolved?

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rigid orbit
trim joltBOT
rigid orbit
#

a + b = 1?

#

(y - 1 + 2 + 1) = 2(x + 1 - 1 + 2) ?

trim joltBOT
#

@rigid orbit Has your question been resolved?

past widget
#

Now it is reflected over y = x. What do you think will the new line be?

rigid orbit
past widget
#

Alr, tell me what you get on reflection

rigid orbit
#

(½)x = y

#

½ + 0 = ½

#

What happend if I were to reflect on line y = 3x + 3

past widget
#

Fortunately that is not the question

#

So stick to the question for now

#

Btw y = x/2 is correct. Now you just need to compare to get a, b and find a + b

rigid orbit
past widget
#

HUH

#

y = 2h + 4 = 2(h + 2) = 2x

#

(h + 2, 2h + 4) is parametric for your line after all the translation

rigid orbit
rigid orbit
past widget
#

Rack your brains

rigid orbit
#

Alr thank you

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rigid orbit

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wispy raptor
#

Let ABC be triangle with incenter I. Let the incircle be tangent to AB and BC at P and Q, and reflect C over the bisector of BAC to D, how to prove the midpoint of CD is collinear with P and Q?

wispy raptor
past widget
#

Hm, that is the question tho. I see

wispy raptor
#

yea

#

the midpoint of CD is kinda obscure

past widget
#

It's not, it's the foot of AI on CD

#

ACD being a isosceles

wispy raptor
#

oh right

wispy raptor
past widget
#

To show RQP' makes a cute angle 90-B/2 with AD

vernal palm
wispy raptor
vernal palm
#

where?

wispy raptor
#

when typing

vagrant prism
vernal palm
#

thanks

trim joltBOT
#

@wispy raptor Has your question been resolved?

wispy raptor
#

<@&286206848099549185>

past widget
#

Can you proceed from here?

wispy raptor
#

wait a min

past widget
#

BP = BQ

past widget
#

Figure, that's a hint

#

!nosols

trim joltBOT
#

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

wispy raptor
#

like this?

past widget
#

Huh, what's the dots

wispy raptor
#

like i dont know how to fill in 😅😅

past widget
#

No that's not how

#

Another Hint: You'll have to use SAS criteria for similarity

wispy raptor
past widget
#

Similarity not congruence

wispy raptor
past widget
#

Once you figure ∆ARP ~ ∆ACI => ARP = ACI = C/2 => PRC = (A+B)/2 but we have PR'C = (A+B)/2

wispy raptor
#

so if SAS similarity then PAR=IAC and smh i gotta prove AP/AR=PI/PC?

dreamy mango
#

You can use menelaus on this i guess

#

I know how to solve this but I am bad at english

past widget
#

We solved it but alternate solutions are always welcome

dreamy mango
#

I am Vietnamese but I will try to write it down

#

I found it difficult to explain 😦

wispy raptor
dreamy mango
#

Ok

#

I will write it down

#

Wait for a sec

wispy raptor
past widget
#

Lol, almost close

#

AP/AI = AR/AC = cos(A/2)

#

And included angle A/2 is equal => ∆ARP ~ ∆ACI

dreamy mango
wispy raptor
past widget
#

Yeah that's a different question, I suppose

wispy raptor
past widget
wispy raptor
past widget
#

You can rearrange the ratios though for your similarity criteria once you've derived it

#

AP/AI = AR/AC <=> AP/AR = AI/AC <=> AP • AC = AR • AI

wispy raptor
#

ahh sry gotit

#

thanks again arya 😅

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wispy raptor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ocean quail
#

if m ∈ R and the system is incompatible, find m

tacit loom
#

add equation 1 and 2

ocean quail
#

why

#

it would give 2x - (m^2-m)+(m+2)z = 3

#

oh, you want me to solve it by saying that this and the last one are equal?

tacit loom
#

yes

ocean quail
#

no no, i need a solution that involves matrices

tacit loom
#

then use the determinant

ocean quail
#

i tried

tacit loom
#

gets messy though

ocean quail
#

wanna see what i got?

wooden plover
#

you can just start with a determinant in the first place tbh

#

to get the values of m for which the system ain't invertible

ocean quail
#

but -1 is NOTT the answer

#

so yea

ocean quail
wooden plover
#

you need the det to be 0, but that's not enough

ocean quail
wooden plover
#

the system still might be compatible even if it's not invertible, depending on the right hand side

#

e.g. x+y = 1, 2x+2y = 2

ocean quail
#

yea yea i know

#

so after you find the values of m, you just check which one works

wooden plover
#

yeah

ocean quail
#

how do i find those values

wooden plover
#

well plug in the value of m you wanna check first

ocean quail
#

cuz my method is absolute trash

wooden plover
#

then you can use gaussian elimination for example

#

if you get an inconsistency in the end like 0 = 3 your system ain't compatible

#

otherwise it is

ocean quail
#

yea we dont use that

#

but it doesnt matter really, i can just check the solutions after and see which one works

#

thats the easy part

#

i only know Rouche and Kronecker-capeli

#

which are enough imo, i dont need 40 methods to prove that a matrice is compatible or not

wooden plover
#

you asked me for something lol

ocean quail
#

oh

ocean quail
wooden plover
#

no

ocean quail
#

i thought u meant to check the values you got for m

wooden plover
#

I'm just talking about the checking yeah

ocean quail
wooden plover
#

but you seemed to imply your methods for checking were complete trash

ocean quail
#

i need to find the values first

ocean quail
wooden plover
#

ah ig I misread the convo

ocean quail
#

cuz none of the values i got are right

#

so no matter which way i check, because m is none of those

wooden plover
#

I mean actually a bit of gaussian elimination works very fine here to help you get the det

#

like just do some row reduction to get 1 0 0 on the first column

ocean quail
#

hmmm, thats a good idea

wooden plover
#

this won't change the det of the matrix

#

and you only have to compute a 2x2 det now

ocean quail
#

ill get a sum of 2 matrices, no

#

?

#

2x2 matrices

wooden plover
#

just 1

ocean quail
#

can you make all the elements 0?

#

im left with a 1

wooden plover
#

what

#

I mean keep the 1 on top yeah

#

then it's pretty obvious that the det of the matrix is the same as the 2x2 on bottom right after row ops

ocean quail
#

oh yea

#

oh oki

#

this worked out really smooth

#

thx

#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ocean quail

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bright seal
#

Given the following linear map:

[
f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^2
]

defined as ( f(x, y, z) = (3x + 2y - z, x - z) ). Given the bases ( \mathcal{B} = { e_1, e_2, e_3 } ) and ( \mathcal{B}' = { (2,2), (-1,2) } ), determine the matrix associated with the linear map with respect to the bases ( M_{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} ).

solid kilnBOT
#

Task Bot

bright seal
#

I know how to do it with 1 base, now with 2 how to do it pls help

sudden mortar
bright seal
#

Given a linear transformation ( f: V \to W ), where ( V ) and ( W ) are vector spaces with bases ( \mathcal{B} = { v_1, v_2, \dots, v_n } ) and ( \mathcal{B}' = { w_1, w_2, \dots, w_m } ) respectively, the matrix of ( f ) with respect to these bases, denoted by ( M_{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} ), is the unique ( m \times n ) matrix such that:

[
[f(v_1)]{\mathcal{B}'} \quad [f(v_2)]{\mathcal{B}'} \quad \dots \quad [f(v_n)]_{\mathcal{B}'}
]

where each column ( [f(v_j)]_{\mathcal{B}'} ) represents the coordinate vector of ( f(v_j) ) with respect to the basis ( \mathcal{B}' ).

Thus, the transformation satisfies:

[
[f(x)]{\mathcal{B}'} = M{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} [x]_{\mathcal{B}}
]

for all ( x \in V ).

solid kilnBOT
#

Task Bot

bright seal
sudden mortar
#

okay, as we can see in the definition you are asked to calculate the matrix which is defined:
for each column, take the a vector v from the base B (of the space R^3), calculate f(v) (which is in R^2) and represent it according to the base B' of R^2

#

and then all the columns together (next to each other, by order) are the matrix that you need to compute

bright seal
# sudden mortar okay, as we can see in the definition you are asked to calculate the matrix whic...

Step 1: Compute the images of the basis vectors

[
f(1,0,0) = (3,1), \quad f(0,1,0) = (2,0), \quad f(0,0,1) = (-1,-1)
]

Step 2: Express the results in terms of ( \mathcal{B}' )

Solving the linear systems:

[
(3,1) = 1(2,2) - \frac{1}{2}(-1,2)
]

[
(2,0) = \frac{1}{2}(2,2) - \frac{1}{2}(-1,2)
]

[
(-1,-1) = -\frac{2}{3}(2,2) - \frac{1}{3}(-1,2)
]

Step 3: Construct the matrix

[
M_{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} =
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{2}{3} \
-\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{3}
\end{bmatrix}
]

solid kilnBOT
#

Task Bot

bright seal
#

Is this correct ?

sudden mortar
bright seal
#

Mmm

trim joltBOT
#

@bright seal Has your question been resolved?

bright seal
#

Is this correct now ?

#

@sudden mortar

bright seal
solid kilnBOT
sudden mortar
bright seal
#

thank you very much

soft pendant
bright seal
#

.close

trim joltBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bright seal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

trim joltBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bright seal
#

Consider the endomorphism ( f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^3 ) such that:

[
f(v) = A v
]

with ( v \in \mathbb{R}^3 ) and

[
A =
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 2 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 2
\end{pmatrix}
\in M_3(\mathbb{R})
].

solid kilnBOT
#

Task Bot

bright seal
#

Pls help

soft pendant
#

<@&286206848099549185>

trim joltBOT
#

@bright seal Has your question been resolved?

bright seal
#

<@&286206848099549185>

thorn heart
# bright seal

If I got it right, you're asked to find a basis of R^3 which contains those two vectors

#

And then determine the expression of the given endomorphism in terms of your chosen basis, is that right?

soft pendant
#

i think we need to add a third vector but we dont know how to choose the correct one

thorn heart
bright seal
soft pendant
bright seal
soft pendant
#

we are working togheter

#

i will let task bot write now

thorn heart
bright seal
#

but can I add a random vector?

thorn heart
#

If you need to find the Expression of the endomorphism for some basis, it needs to be one

thorn heart
#

As long as it forms a basis

bright seal
#

How can i choose the correct one ?

thorn heart
#

You're not given any more information to work with

thorn heart
#

Any one vector that satisfies that is “the correct one“

#

Though of course some are easier to work with than others, if I were you, I'd choose one from the canonical basis of R^3

bright seal
#

And the determinant must be non-zero, right?

thorn heart
bright seal
#

Why are the canonical bases e1 and e3 good?

thorn heart
bright seal
#

e1=(1,0,0) ,e3=(0,0,1)

thorn heart
#

The reason why they're good choices is basically cuz they have many zeros, they usually simplify calculations

bright seal
#

Isn't there a way to see "without doing the compute" which one is right?

thorn heart
bright seal
#

That the determinant is not 0

thorn heart
#

You've been talking about finding the “right vector“ from the start, but I'm not sure I follow what you mean

thorn heart
#

Depends on the case

#

A set of vectors is linearly dependent if there exist some scalars a, b and c such that au+bv=cz for vectors u,v,z

#

(I stated that for simplicity, the set can be of any length)

#

What the determinant does is save you that calculation

#

But if you can determine a linear combination by inspection or see that it's impossible, you could skip that too

#

In this case, though, don't think it's worth it, the determinant will reduce to a 2x2 determinant

#

You still there?

bright seal
#

Yes

thorn heart
bright seal
#

Yes @thorn heart

north berry
thorn heart
bright seal
#

No

thorn heart
# bright seal No

Ok, well, you've got your chosen basis then, which one did you choose?

bright seal
#

(0,0,1)

thorn heart
bright seal
#

Yes 🙂

thorn heart
#

Alright, then onto the basis change

#

There's a formula for this, do you know it?

bright seal
#

No

thorn heart
# bright seal No

Given a matrix A associated to a linear application in terms of the canonical basis, then, the matrix A' associated to the linear application in terms of an arbitrary basis B is given by:
A'=C^(-1)AC

#

Where C is the base change matrix from the arbitary base B to the canonical base

bright seal
#

?????

thorn heart
bright seal
#

I wouldn't use this method

thorn heart
bright seal
#

Like this

thorn heart
#

You're swapping between the basis of two different spaces

#

One has three elements, the other two

bright seal
#

This ?

#

@thorn heart

thorn heart
bright seal
#

Its an example

thorn heart
#

You've calculated the image using matrix multiplication, right?

bright seal
#

Yes

thorn heart
#

I mean, in case you really do not want to calculate matrix inverses

#

Even using the method I gave you, you have a way to work around that

#

C is the matrix that maps a vector in terms of the base B to the canonical base, while C^-1 will be the matrix that undoes the transformation

#

That is to say, C^-1 maps the canonical base to the base B

#

Thing is, you actually do know how these matrices will look

#

C will have the vectors if the base B in terms if the canonical basis (how they're shown to you, basically) and placed in columns

#

Meanwhile, C^-1 will have the vectors of the canonical basis in terms of the vectors of the base B(their coordinates, which you can get solving three systems)

#

Once you get those, the problem reduces to multiplying three matrices(I actually think this is what you were trying to do??)

bright seal
#

@thorn heart can we do the exercise ?

thorn heart
#

I'll be a little bit hasty in explaining how I go about it though, hope you don't mind

thorn heart
#

C=(1,1,0)
(-2,-1,0)
(1,1,1))

#

As we know the vectors form a basis, the determinant will be nonzero, hence it'll be an invertible matrix

#

As such, the second matrix we need, C^-1, exists

#

That matrix can be calculated easily through the standard method of calculating inverse matrices, in this case, though, I'll just give ya the solution

#

C^-1=(-1,-1,0)
(2,1,0)
(-1,0,1)

#

Multiplying C^-1AC we get A'

#

A'=(4,2,0)
(-3,-1,0)
(0,0,2)

#

As such the endomorphism would be rewritten in the way:
f(v')=A'v', where v' is any vector in terms of the basis B snd f(v') its image, once again in terms of B

#

And that's all there is to it, really, I'd suggest you look at some more examples if it seems confusing

bright seal
#

@thorn heart yes

#

what is the result?

bright seal
thorn heart
bright seal
#

Is there a way without matrix inverse?

thorn heart
bright seal
#

@thorn heart I'm having trouble calculating the inverse matrix

bright seal
#

It's the first time I've tried

thorn heart
#

Though it's strange you're taking linear algebra without ever having inverted a matrix before

bright seal
#

Ah no its easy

bright seal
#

😭

#

C^-1=(-1,1,0) (-2,1,0) (-1,0,-1)

#

Ops

#

I got wrong

#

I fix !!!

bright seal
#

@thorn heart It came out a little different to me

#

Pls help

thorn heart
bright seal
#

Np

thorn heart
bright seal
#

I'm calculating C^-1 A

thorn heart
bright seal
#

Yes

thorn heart
# bright seal Yes

And did you get the correct result?(Asking cuz I don't see the inverse anywhere)

bright seal
#

Oh

#

Since the detA was 1 I left (A*)^t

#

So C^-1=(A*)^t

thorn heart
bright seal
#

The matrix I got with algebraic complements

thorn heart
#

(you've got the actual inverse written somewhere in this chat regardless)

bright seal
#

Yes

thorn heart
#

After that, first you need to multiply C^-1 A

bright seal
thorn heart
#

And then multiply that resulting matrix by C

bright seal
#

Yes

#

I did as you said

thorn heart
#

Then it's merely a computation error

#

You probably made a numeric mistake

bright seal
#

🙂

trim joltBOT
#

@bright seal Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @bright seal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

serene crane
#

can you help me walk through HOW to know which operation to do
ALSO
can someone please explain the matric rules to me
Heres what i have in my notes from my teacher

  1. Row rescaling: Multiply all entries in a row by a nonzero number (Can I just pick a random number of my choosing?)
  2. Row exchangement/swap: Switch the order of two rows (I understand makes sense)
  3. Row repalcement: replace a row by the sum of itself and a multiple of another row (Not understanding this, is the sum the element thats at the far right end, and what does it mean a multiple of another row)
    As for the problem, how did they know to do Step1c where they multipled row 1 by 2? Also which rule is subtracting?
serene crane
ionic pendant
#
  1. Row rescaling: Multiply all entries in a row by a nonzero number (Can I just pick a random number of my choosing?)
    as long as it isn't 0, yes. but some numbers will be more useful than others
  2. Row repalcement: replace a row by the sum of itself and a multiple of another row (Not understanding this, is the sum the element thats at the far right end, and what does it mean a multiple of another row)
    you add every element in one row with the corresponding element of the other row (1st to 1st, 2nd to 2nd, and so on)
#

by a multiple, they mean that row multiplied by a number as in the row scaling gase

serene crane
#

like 1+2+9+-1

#

or without -1

ionic pendant
#

you don't add the row to itself

serene crane
#

oh?

#

please explain

#

OH

#

wait

#

1+2, 2+1, 9+12

ionic pendant
#

if you do r1 -> r1 + r2
you replace the first entry in row 1 with the sum of the first entry in row 1 and the first entry in row 2, and so on

serene crane
ionic pendant
#

yes

serene crane
#

like lets say there were 3 rows

#

uhh

#

3 1 8 | 0

#

(random numbers)

#

if I did r1->r1+r2, i can view it as theres a plus in between row 1 and 2?

#

Like we're adding the top variable to the variable below it

#

is what im asking

ionic pendant
#

sure

serene crane
#

In step2b, they divided. What rule is this.

ionic pendant
#

that's really just multiplying by 1/-3

serene crane
#

oh so rescaling

#

And logic wise, how did they know to multiply row 1 by 2? (Also you can combine multiple rules into one? Because step 1c is repalcement, and R1 is having row rescaling done to it

ionic pendant
#

you can only do one operation at a time

serene crane
#

then how are they multiplying r1 by two, and also subtracting r1 from r2 (Also which rule would be subtraction?)

ionic pendant
#

that's what it means to "add a multiple"

#

they are adding -2*row 1

serene crane
#

Im getting its row replacement

#

(I also realized the reason they knew to do a 2 is because they were going column by column)

ionic pendant
#

when you do row addition, instead of adding just another row, you can instead add some number multiplied by that row (we call something multiplied by a number a multiple of that thing)

serene crane
#

for that second part yourte saying

#

you can instead add a row multipled by a number of your choice

#

so I could pick -3 for all I wanted

ionic pendant
#

yes

#

-3 would just be less useful

serene crane
#

okay its clicking holy shit

#

ive learned more from you than my teacher in two days, she blazed through everything

#

I have one last two part question then i think i should be off

#

For number 2, how is the last column not a pivot if thats where its 1. Is it because theres nothing below it to make it a pivot? Also there wouldn't be 0's under it?
For number 3, Is it being its like #2, but also after the 1 theres something there (in this case 4)

Also, understanding a free variable is hard to me

ionic pendant
#

a pivot is the first nonzero entry in a row, starting from the left

#

so in example 3, the pivot of the second row is the "1" in column 3

serene crane
#

OH also, is the best way to go about this, going column by column and making sure all the rules are being met per column. rather than looking at it as a whole?

Like for the photo, we got the pivot points. Theres zeros under the pivots, and the last 1 (last pivot point) has only zeros in its column

serene crane
#

Is the 4 a free variable?

ionic pendant
#

yes, column 4 is a free column

serene crane
#

In #2, how doesnt the last coulmn have a pivot?

#

Theres a 1 there

#

is it because theres no numbers after the 1?

ionic pendant
#

in #2 there are no "1"s in the last column?

serene crane
ionic pendant
#

each column (except the last/augmented column) is either a pivot column (contains a pivot, corresponds to a pivot variable), or a free column (does not contain a pivot, corresponds to a free variable)

#

when they say "last column" they mean the augmented column [a; b; c]

serene crane
#

oh wait

#

#2 is saying they dont care about the last column

#

only the columns prior to it

ionic pendant
#

well they care about the augmented column only if it contains a pivot (as in #1) since that means there are no solutions. if it doesn't have a pivot then there are solutions

serene crane
#

This is clicking now, x2 and x4 arent pivots, and the last column isnt a pivot!

serene crane
ionic pendant
#

the column after the bar

#

it's "augmented" because we've basically glued two different matrices together (the coefficient matrix on the left and the constants on the right)

serene crane
#

Im still not tracking, i get how its augmented now

#

wait

serene crane
#

is that considered to be a pivot column

#

because it has a non zero

ionic pendant
#

it can have a pivot, but it doesn't correspond to a variable so it doesn't really fit into the distinction about variables

serene crane
#

so x33 isnt a pivot?