#help-38
1 messages · Page 183 of 1
But I’m thinking of just x^2 /2
now, lets take the base of the triangle (for 0<x<1) to be x
Why is it x-x^2 /2
yeah, but consider that y=1-x.
what is the area of the triangle in terms of x and y?
Can you help me making the step ?
Can you help me ?
draw it
i guess that works.
Where to get X-x^2/2
what will be the base and height of the triangle
What do you mean ?
Ohh okeyyy
meunderstand now.
@uncut bough think of it as trapezoid rather than triangle
let me show!
Aightt thanks
So y = 0 ?
no
we are analyzing $\int_0^x f(t)dt$, so $x$ is changing from $0<x<1$
;(
you know y=1-x, so now solve and i believe it will work?
yes it works perfectly
@uncut bough
Okey
sorry its like 2am over here
Let me try
Ohh yea
That workssss
Thank youu so muchhhh
Appreciate ittt
Thanks!!!
@empty orchid
i will be off now
Closed by @uncut bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, this is a test because I am new here, and I am curious on the process works. Please help me with the following math problem: Solve for x:
\sqrt{x} = 4
I am assuming for an easy stuff, the bot will show how solve it, and for the hard questions a human help 🙂
No bot, we're all humans
Humans help for all problems
oh I didn't know this!
okay I will try and come up with some truly hard problems then 🙂
dead internet theory hitting hard huh
lol. Well, the answer is 16

Closed by @opaque narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@brave rampart Has your question been resolved?
@brave rampart Has your question been resolved?
Start with bounding: for any permutation of (1, 2, ..., n), the given expression 2n > n/1 + (n-1)/2 + ... + 1/n ≥ a_1 + a_2/2 + ... + a_n/n ≥ 1 + 1 + ... + 1 = n
perhaps that might give an insight
but since you're to count number of permutations in a closed form s_n, it might not helpmuch
||induction go brrrr||
@brave rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think I know how to solve it but im just stuck on 1 thing
u = x^2 - 3
du = 2x dx
du = 2x dx
Thx
To get rid of the x^3 do I do
u = x^2 - 3
u + 3 = x^2
sqrt(u + 3) = x
no
split x^3 into
x *** x^2**
express the x^2 in terms of u
while you use the other x with dx and convert that to du
Closed by @radiant portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the equation and length of common tangent to hyperbolas
[
\frac{x^2}{a^2} - \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1 \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{y^2}{a^2} - \frac{x^2}{b^2} = 1
]
riddle
,rotate
Got slope m=±1 of tangent
@lethal vigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, im really lost about how to do these. I understand that the first one is supposed to use the stars and bars theorem but i dont know why i cant do 5^20 and i just dont know how to do b and c
is this the whole question?
@untold sage
and where did you get answers?
because it seems to be a D(n,k) question
Ig in part a they applied a restriction like at least one of each type is displayed
Or smthng else !
Why would we need stars and bara though ?
Part b reads, at least 4 9v, so we can leave 4 places for 9 v and do 5^16, considering the places are identical.
@untold sage Has your question been resolved?
I don't think he's here anymore
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
∞-∞ form
which means?
You just perform lcm
lcm?
-(x-1) = -x + 1
0/0 form
i have x/1-x instead of x/x-1
k, but with 0/0 you can derive
l'hopital?
sure try
lim x-> 1+ ln(x)/(ln(x)+(x-1)/x)) ?
then i can plug in 1 so it will be 0/(0+1/1) = 0/1= 0?
wait no fuck
which means, you substitute x = y + 1
now or at the start?
even now would be fine
aah okay
Let me write the expression for you
$L = \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{(1 + y)\ln (1 + y) - y}{y\ln (1 + y)}$
Arya
nevermind cookie, do you get how to proceed from here?
not sure let me try please
btw, remember $\lim_{y \to 0} \frac{\ln(1 + y)}{y} = 1$
Arya
L'hopital?
do you want to do L'hopital? 🥺
okay go ahead, but even for using L'hopital, I'll suggest simplifying the denom at least
There is no reason not to do LHôptial.
yes rewrite ln(1 + y) as [ln(1 + y)/y] * y, the square bracket goes to 1
wait let me take a screenshot of what i haven ow
oh
i can still do that and then split the limits?
ln(1 + y) = y - y²/2 in the num immediately gives limit = 1/2 :/
there's no reason to even know or mention lhopital
You need to put O(y³).
$= \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{(1 + y)\ln (1 + y) - y}{y^2 \cancelto{1}{\frac{\ln (1 + y)}{y}}}$
Arya
screw that :/
ye i would have never ever done that in my entire life
I knoww but i just didnt see that step
but you know the standard limit for ln(1 + y)/y
let me write this down real quick and try to solve it then
ye and the sin(x)/x and stuff
the only right step is to use that
and the (1 - cos x)/x² stuff
welp std. limits have their use depending on your indeterminate form
wait where did cos come from
imagination
i didnt know that one
our prof doesnt want us to memorize a lot
introducing cos to this is crazy 💀
so we only get little to use
ye it was just an example for special limits
I hope your professor doesn't make you remember L'Hopital is the way for all limits
no we just learned that this week
so it was more of a guess tbh
that i had to use it for these exercises
why do they even teach that
it might be an intended way to do this exercise then
okie then, after reducing the denom, you're free to use Lhopital
$= \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{\ln (1 + y) - y}{y^2} + \lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{\ln(1+y)}{y}$
Arya
you can use lhopital for the left part
in my unpopular opinion, you can also use lhop right at the start to avoid excessive manipulation
i am still trying to figure out this step
it's just expanding (1+y)ln(1+y) to ln(1+y) + yln(1+y) and then splitting the fraction
$\frac{x\ln x - x + 1}{(x - 1)\ln x}$ hmm, you can just plug an alternative solution by using lhop on this
Arya
no biggie 
I'll put the raw l'hop one here but I thought it was also valuable you going through some limit principles c:
wait, don't you mean a "xln x" on second num
in the second one
oopsie
👀
nope can't do that
updated
the limit properties state that lim h + lim g = lim(h + g) given both limits exist
You'd probably not like it but one solution to that is by using Taylor series for e^x = 1 + x + x^2/2 + ..
wait I went 4 steps ahead
i dont know taylor series
Lhop it ✅
that the only other way?
you want to do it purely without lhop?
scratch that.. gimme a min
not really :c I just cannot remember the easier way to do it
can you maybe help with another limit?
see ! you get rusty looking at lhop all day :c
hahaha ye
$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - x - 1}{x^2} = \frac{1}{2}$ was another standard integral back in the days :p
Arya
did you lhop the left part, did you get 1/2 as your answer?
not really but it's alr
Huh
$\frac{\ln(1+y) - y}{y^2} = \frac{\frac{1}{1+y} - 1}{2y} = \frac{1 - y - 1}{2y(1 + y)} = \frac{-y}{2y(1+y)}$
Arya
and you cancel the y's get the -1/2
i hope so
seee
l'hop just makes the thinking part way less complicated
but tbh you wont learn lots of it
can you read this?
yes
won't suggest lhopping right away
Noooo
should rationalize
i wouldnt even dare to
is that multiplying by root(1+tan(x)) + (root(1+sin(x)) ?
and also divide
$= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\tan x - \sin x}{2x^3}$
Arya
now change tan x to sin / cos and viola, you get your limit
imma try rq
$= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} \cdot \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1 - \cos x}{x^2}$
Arya
can do
right side was special limit, but you guys didn't do it so
btw 1 - cos x = 2sin²(x/2)
you're getting smarter :p
it was sarcasm :(
one day!!!
but we dont have the right side as a special limit
so i guess i must do l'hopital then
wait i am not even allowed to
wait i am
mb
Hmm?
answer 1/4?
Can't you do this and it's the special limit for sin y / y
well i could but wouldnt hat make it way more complicated?
Waito
wait i might know how to do it
$= \frac{1}{4} \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} \cdot \lim_{x \to 0} \cancelto{1}{(\frac{\sin (x/2)}{x/2})^2}$
Yep the 4 got sent out of space
ye i am not allowed to do it like that
i must make sure the limit is sin(x)/x
so using substitution and stuff until it is in the standard form
Arya
i found a way
Hm?
There's no worries tho, you can L'Hopital, since it's a lhop exercise
✓
what year are you in?
M graduating this yr
:p I used to be sharper before
No way
All the algebra n stuff dulled it down 
Ln both sides?
mmm
Ln L = lim cos(x) ln(tan(x))?
No, I'm asking which indeterminate form it is
✓
okay luckily
smart
we will have inf / inf
i love math
oh no
i am stuck again
how
what is the dy/dx of 1/cos(x)?
Chain it
-1/cos² * -sin
=_+ did you forget how to chain too
You diff wrt cos first
Then diff cos wrt x
i been doing math for the entire day
my brain just stops working

so i will be left with lim x->0 tan(x)/sin(x)?
=1?
You should be left with cos x/sin² x
I am not allowed to use sec :-:
i give up
Btw this limit is 1
well at least i got that right

but the l'hopital is just so ugly if your not allowed to use sec and stuff
so many brackets they confuse me
but i cant simplify ln(tan x) / 1/cos(x) right
✓
You did have a way btw
yes that's not ugly
`huh
You've not seen ugly !
this is!
That's just cot x cosec x
not for me
it is if your not allowed to use them
okay ill just do this tomorrow
i am too cooked
anyways Arya
you been amazing help
thank you very very much

.close
Closed by @half marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Why is the x coming out of the integral?
its respect to y.
All other variables besides the Integration variable are constant
so in this case, x is a constant here.
similar to how $\frac{\partial}{\partial y}xy=x$.
they kept the x for the u-sub.
;(
You could take out both it doesn't really matter
?
Or am I wrong
there is not, since it vanished in the u-sub.
xtan(x)e^xy + ø_1(x) should be the final answer
Ohhh
Right
Must have cancelled with the du/dx = x
$\int xe^{xy}\partial y=\overbrace{\int e^udu}^{u=xy, \partial u=x\partial y}$
Thanks!
oopsies
I understand now it's fine haha
;(
.close
Closed by @molten comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is concave up vs concave down again
i refuse to accept these are the proper terms for it TT
sometimes concave up is called convex and concave down is called concave
idk why my teacher doesnt use those
this doesnt make sense
wouldnt concave up be concave and concave down be convex
Nope
conviced whoever created these terms never knew basic words in the dictionary
is this right?
All look right yea
Closed by @craggy basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this problem
are you supposed to graph it or find asymptotes or what specifically
?
this is part b of a problem... what is the problem?
<@&268886789983436800>
Calculator
yeah i can help you with that. bye.
I didn’t catch that it was two parts
the only case where this has an x-intercept is if a=0
and 0 isn't positive constant so no x-intercept
set h(x) = 0, and it should be evident that there's no x-intercepts.
the a/(x-b) where a=0 ?
not nesseciraly (I misspell alot srry)
you could say something like a/(x-b)=0 and the only case that it intercepts the x-axis if a=0 and because 0 is not a positive constant then there is no x intercept
might be too wordy and not sure if it could be shorter
@knotty glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello ,I can't find the mistake
@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?
@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?
@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?
Try to resolve it with a new blank paper, idk
@limpid pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what did i do wrong
looks right
i only got half points
my guess would be that the application doesn't like the vertices at x=0 and x=1
thats so dumb
yes. yes it is.
tell your teacher you want to do math with pencil and paper.
i dont think hed allow that
outsourcing math homework to these 🦆 ing app companies is causing lethargicness and brainrot in math students
not as much as social media, but close
im really behind on math so im not really allowed to complain
and more anxiety for teachers than its worth
wasnt even allowed to be in the class TT
I think the app wanted you to draw a line segment from (-1,-2) to (2,1)
I dunno how you got those points at (0,-1) and (1,0)
the app doesn't know how to handle whatever you tried to do.
that's why math apps suck
ah, pearson
idk im really overwhelmed with this math class and idk what to do TT
you'd think they of all companies have the recources to account for these contingencies
you got the answer right. Take a screenshot. Show your teacher. Get full credit.
You can move on.
does your teacher/professor have office hours
probably need to discuss that 😭
i think so but i cant complain cause i wasnt allowed in this class and had to ask him to override it soooo yeah
all teachers like observant students
you have the right to your own credit.
your teacher will be happy you brought it up because it means you are trying and validates their existence.
yeah but i litterally said i understand all the prerecs and i dont
believe me or don't, man
eh
ive had expections made for me before because i didnt meet the prerecs
just do okay and theyll trust you
idk if it makes sense but if i tell him im basically saying i lied to his face
The app did you wrong.
Next time, plot as few points as you need to
.close
Closed by @craggy basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would this graph have 3 rel extrema or 4? i thought 4 bc at x=6 its und but still changes signs
@gray pebble Has your question been resolved?
@gray pebble Has your question been resolved?
@gray pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@rigid orbit Has your question been resolved?
=> y = 2x is your line after all translations```
Now it is reflected over y = x. What do you think will the new line be?
I need to swap the x y value then solve for y
Alr, tell me what you get on reflection
Fortunately that is not the question
So stick to the question for now
Btw y = x/2 is correct. Now you just need to compare to get a, b and find a + b
The result is h + 2, 2h + 4 so
2h + 4 = h + 2?
a = ½
b = 0
½ + 0 = ½
HUH
y = 2h + 4 = 2(h + 2) = 2x
(h + 2, 2h + 4) is parametric for your line after all the translation
Owh.....
Wait, why 2(h + 2) = 2x? Bevause x = h + 2 hmmm
Rack your brains
Closed by @rigid orbit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let ABC be triangle with incenter I. Let the incircle be tangent to AB and BC at P and Q, and reflect C over the bisector of BAC to D, how to prove the midpoint of CD is collinear with P and Q?
Would suffice to show PQ bisects CD
Hm, that is the question tho. I see
oh right
why not make P/Q the phantom point instead?
To show RQP' makes a cute angle 90-B/2 with AD
how do you write text like that?
add double `
where?
when typing
like this
thanks
@wispy raptor Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
wait a min
sry how is R'PD=90-B/2?
BP = BQ
how is ARP~ACI tho
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
PR'D=(A+B)/2
APR=...=AIC
ARP~ACI
ARP=90-C/2=(A+B)/2
like this?
Huh, what's the dots
like i dont know how to fill in 😅😅
i genuinely cant see any congruence
Similarity not congruence
if i figured ARP~ACI how would the proof be strucutred, if not the way i proposed?
Once you figure ∆ARP ~ ∆ACI => ARP = ACI = C/2 => PRC = (A+B)/2 but we have PR'C = (A+B)/2
oh yea right it's this
so if SAS similarity then PAR=IAC and smh i gotta prove AP/AR=PI/PC?
You can use menelaus on this i guess
I know how to solve this but I am bad at english
We solved it but alternate solutions are always welcome
it's nvm
prove AP/AI=AR/AC, AR/AC = cos ACR=cosADR and im stuck again
Lol, almost close
AP/AI = AR/AC = cos(A/2)
And included angle A/2 is equal => ∆ARP ~ ∆ACI
bruh wait a min im fking stupid
Yeah that's a different question, I suppose
shouldnt it be AP/AR=AI/AC btw
AP/AR is not cos(A/2) 
no we want APR~AIC tho?
You can rearrange the ratios though for your similarity criteria once you've derived it
AP/AI = AR/AC <=> AP/AR = AI/AC <=> AP • AC = AR • AI
Closed by @wispy raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if m ∈ R and the system is incompatible, find m
add equation 1 and 2
why
it would give 2x - (m^2-m)+(m+2)z = 3
oh, you want me to solve it by saying that this and the last one are equal?
yes
no no, i need a solution that involves matrices
then use the determinant
i tried
gets messy though
wanna see what i got?
you can just start with a determinant in the first place tbh
to get the values of m for which the system ain't invertible
yea so the determinant needs to be 0
you need the det to be 0, but that's not enough
tell me more then
the system still might be compatible even if it's not invertible, depending on the right hand side
e.g. x+y = 1, 2x+2y = 2
yeah
how do i find those values
well plug in the value of m you wanna check first
cuz my method is absolute trash
then you can use gaussian elimination for example
if you get an inconsistency in the end like 0 = 3 your system ain't compatible
otherwise it is
yea we dont use that
but it doesnt matter really, i can just check the solutions after and see which one works
thats the easy part
i only know Rouche and Kronecker-capeli
which are enough imo, i dont need 40 methods to prove that a matrice is compatible or not
you asked me for something lol
oh
u wanna use this method to find the values of m?
no
i thought u meant to check the values you got for m
I'm just talking about the checking yeah
well yea, thats the easy part
but you seemed to imply your methods for checking were complete trash
i need to find the values first
the method of trying to find the values
ah ig I misread the convo
cuz none of the values i got are right
so no matter which way i check, because m is none of those
I mean actually a bit of gaussian elimination works very fine here to help you get the det
like just do some row reduction to get 1 0 0 on the first column
hmmm, thats a good idea
this won't change the det of the matrix
and you only have to compute a 2x2 det now
just 1
what
I mean keep the 1 on top yeah
then it's pretty obvious that the det of the matrix is the same as the 2x2 on bottom right after row ops
Closed by @ocean quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given the following linear map:
[
f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^2
]
defined as ( f(x, y, z) = (3x + 2y - z, x - z) ). Given the bases ( \mathcal{B} = { e_1, e_2, e_3 } ) and ( \mathcal{B}' = { (2,2), (-1,2) } ), determine the matrix associated with the linear map with respect to the bases ( M_{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} ).
Task Bot
I know how to do it with 1 base, now with 2 how to do it pls help
do you have the definition for this sort of matrix?
Given a linear transformation ( f: V \to W ), where ( V ) and ( W ) are vector spaces with bases ( \mathcal{B} = { v_1, v_2, \dots, v_n } ) and ( \mathcal{B}' = { w_1, w_2, \dots, w_m } ) respectively, the matrix of ( f ) with respect to these bases, denoted by ( M_{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} ), is the unique ( m \times n ) matrix such that:
[
[f(v_1)]{\mathcal{B}'} \quad [f(v_2)]{\mathcal{B}'} \quad \dots \quad [f(v_n)]_{\mathcal{B}'}
]
where each column ( [f(v_j)]_{\mathcal{B}'} ) represents the coordinate vector of ( f(v_j) ) with respect to the basis ( \mathcal{B}' ).
Thus, the transformation satisfies:
[
[f(x)]{\mathcal{B}'} = M{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} [x]_{\mathcal{B}}
]
for all ( x \in V ).
Task Bot
I don't know what it means
okay, as we can see in the definition you are asked to calculate the matrix which is defined:
for each column, take the a vector v from the base B (of the space R^3), calculate f(v) (which is in R^2) and represent it according to the base B' of R^2
and then all the columns together (next to each other, by order) are the matrix that you need to compute
Step 1: Compute the images of the basis vectors
[
f(1,0,0) = (3,1), \quad f(0,1,0) = (2,0), \quad f(0,0,1) = (-1,-1)
]
Step 2: Express the results in terms of ( \mathcal{B}' )
Solving the linear systems:
[
(3,1) = 1(2,2) - \frac{1}{2}(-1,2)
]
[
(2,0) = \frac{1}{2}(2,2) - \frac{1}{2}(-1,2)
]
[
(-1,-1) = -\frac{2}{3}(2,2) - \frac{1}{3}(-1,2)
]
Step 3: Construct the matrix
[
M_{\mathcal{B}}^{\mathcal{B}'} =
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{2}{3} \
-\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{3}
\end{bmatrix}
]
Task Bot
Is this correct ?
that's the idea, just your calculation for the linear systems is wrong
Mmm
@bright seal Has your question been resolved?
,rotate
looks good
.close
Closed by @bright seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider the endomorphism ( f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^3 ) such that:
[
f(v) = A v
]
with ( v \in \mathbb{R}^3 ) and
[
A =
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 2 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 2
\end{pmatrix}
\in M_3(\mathbb{R})
].
Task Bot
<@&286206848099549185>
@bright seal Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
If I got it right, you're asked to find a basis of R^3 which contains those two vectors
And then determine the expression of the given endomorphism in terms of your chosen basis, is that right?
i think we need to add a third vector but we dont know how to choose the correct one
Could you post the original exercise too?
Is this
its this one
With this
Alright, fairly sure it should be this then
but can I add a random vector?
If you need to find the Expression of the endomorphism for some basis, it needs to be one
From my understanding, yeah
As long as it forms a basis
How can i choose the correct one ?
You're not given any more information to work with
Just choose any vector that's linearly independent to the other two
Any one vector that satisfies that is “the correct one“
Though of course some are easier to work with than others, if I were you, I'd choose one from the canonical basis of R^3
And the determinant must be non-zero, right?
Yeah
Why are the canonical bases e1 and e3 good?
Wdym by “the canonical bases e1 and e3“?
e1=(1,0,0) ,e3=(0,0,1)
(I'm gonna assume either one of those work, haven't computed the determinant)
The reason why they're good choices is basically cuz they have many zeros, they usually simplify calculations
Isn't there a way to see "without doing the compute" which one is right?
What do you mean by “which one is right“?
That the determinant is not 0
You've been talking about finding the “right vector“ from the start, but I'm not sure I follow what you mean
Oh, well
Depends on the case
A set of vectors is linearly dependent if there exist some scalars a, b and c such that au+bv=cz for vectors u,v,z
(I stated that for simplicity, the set can be of any length)
What the determinant does is save you that calculation
But if you can determine a linear combination by inspection or see that it's impossible, you could skip that too
In this case, though, don't think it's worth it, the determinant will reduce to a 2x2 determinant
You still there?
Yes
Well, have you already determined the basis?
Yes @thorn heart
Inbox
Alright, do you know how to proceed from here?
No
Ok, well, you've got your chosen basis then, which one did you choose?
(0,0,1)
So the basis is {(1,-2,1),(1,-1,1),(0,0,1)}
Yes 🙂
No
Given a matrix A associated to a linear application in terms of the canonical basis, then, the matrix A' associated to the linear application in terms of an arbitrary basis B is given by:
A'=C^(-1)AC
Where C is the base change matrix from the arbitary base B to the canonical base
?????
Where did you get lost?
And what would you do then?
I haven't read it all but it can't be right
You're swapping between the basis of two different spaces
One has three elements, the other two
Why are you considering R^4?
Its an example
Uh, yeah I guess
You've calculated the image using matrix multiplication, right?
Yes
Well, alright
I mean, in case you really do not want to calculate matrix inverses
Even using the method I gave you, you have a way to work around that
C is the matrix that maps a vector in terms of the base B to the canonical base, while C^-1 will be the matrix that undoes the transformation
That is to say, C^-1 maps the canonical base to the base B
Thing is, you actually do know how these matrices will look
C will have the vectors if the base B in terms if the canonical basis (how they're shown to you, basically) and placed in columns
Meanwhile, C^-1 will have the vectors of the canonical basis in terms of the vectors of the base B(their coordinates, which you can get solving three systems)
Once you get those, the problem reduces to multiplying three matrices(I actually think this is what you were trying to do??)
@thorn heart can we do the exercise ?
Welp, ok
I'll be a little bit hasty in explaining how I go about it though, hope you don't mind
Alright this is our chosen basis, which means that our first basis change matrix, C, will be like this:
C=(1,1,0)
(-2,-1,0)
(1,1,1))
As we know the vectors form a basis, the determinant will be nonzero, hence it'll be an invertible matrix
As such, the second matrix we need, C^-1, exists
That matrix can be calculated easily through the standard method of calculating inverse matrices, in this case, though, I'll just give ya the solution
C^-1=(-1,-1,0)
(2,1,0)
(-1,0,1)
Multiplying C^-1AC we get A'
A'=(4,2,0)
(-3,-1,0)
(0,0,2)
As such the endomorphism would be rewritten in the way:
f(v')=A'v', where v' is any vector in terms of the basis B snd f(v') its image, once again in terms of B
And that's all there is to it, really, I'd suggest you look at some more examples if it seems confusing
This right ?
Yeah
Is there a way without matrix inverse?
I told you before
Read from here
@thorn heart I'm having trouble calculating the inverse matrix
How so?
It's the first time I've tried
That's a matter of practice then
Though it's strange you're taking linear algebra without ever having inverted a matrix before
Ah no its easy
I got different
😭
C^-1=(-1,1,0) (-2,1,0) (-1,0,-1)
Ops
I got wrong
I fix !!!
Let's see(sorry I took a while, was studying myself)
Np
Don't see what you're trying to do here
I'm calculating C^-1 A
Do you have C^-1?
Yes
And did you get the correct result?(Asking cuz I don't see the inverse anywhere)
What do you mean by A*?
The matrix I got with algebraic complements
Welp, alright, I'll assume you took the inverse right
(you've got the actual inverse written somewhere in this chat regardless)
Yes
After that, first you need to multiply C^-1 A
Here
And then multiply that resulting matrix by C
🙂
@bright seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bright seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you help me walk through HOW to know which operation to do
ALSO
can someone please explain the matric rules to me
Heres what i have in my notes from my teacher
- Row rescaling: Multiply all entries in a row by a nonzero number (Can I just pick a random number of my choosing?)
- Row exchangement/swap: Switch the order of two rows (I understand makes sense)
- Row repalcement: replace a row by the sum of itself and a multiple of another row (Not understanding this, is the sum the element thats at the far right end, and what does it mean a multiple of another row)
As for the problem, how did they know to do Step1c where they multipled row 1 by 2? Also which rule is subtracting?
- Row rescaling: Multiply all entries in a row by a nonzero number (Can I just pick a random number of my choosing?)
as long as it isn't 0, yes. but some numbers will be more useful than others- Row repalcement: replace a row by the sum of itself and a multiple of another row (Not understanding this, is the sum the element thats at the far right end, and what does it mean a multiple of another row)
you add every element in one row with the corresponding element of the other row (1st to 1st, 2nd to 2nd, and so on)
by a multiple, they mean that row multiplied by a number as in the row scaling gase
for 3), are we including the answer also?
like 1+2+9+-1
or without -1
you don't add the row to itself
if you do r1 -> r1 + r2
you replace the first entry in row 1 with the sum of the first entry in row 1 and the first entry in row 2, and so on
^ so that would be row 1 if we did r1 -> r1+r2
yes
like lets say there were 3 rows
uhh
3 1 8 | 0
(random numbers)
if I did r1->r1+r2, i can view it as theres a plus in between row 1 and 2?
Like we're adding the top variable to the variable below it
is what im asking
sure
In step2b, they divided. What rule is this.
that's really just multiplying by 1/-3
oh so rescaling
And logic wise, how did they know to multiply row 1 by 2? (Also you can combine multiple rules into one? Because step 1c is repalcement, and R1 is having row rescaling done to it
you can only do one operation at a time
then how are they multiplying r1 by two, and also subtracting r1 from r2 (Also which rule would be subtraction?)
just saw this, not sure what row scaling gase is. But im still lost on -2 being a multiple
Im getting its row replacement
(I also realized the reason they knew to do a 2 is because they were going column by column)
when you do row addition, instead of adding just another row, you can instead add some number multiplied by that row (we call something multiplied by a number a multiple of that thing)
for that second part yourte saying
you can instead add a row multipled by a number of your choice
so I could pick -3 for all I wanted
okay its clicking holy shit
ive learned more from you than my teacher in two days, she blazed through everything
I have one last two part question then i think i should be off
For number 2, how is the last column not a pivot if thats where its 1. Is it because theres nothing below it to make it a pivot? Also there wouldn't be 0's under it?
For number 3, Is it being its like #2, but also after the 1 theres something there (in this case 4)
Also, understanding a free variable is hard to me
a pivot is the first nonzero entry in a row, starting from the left
so in example 3, the pivot of the second row is the "1" in column 3
OH also, is the best way to go about this, going column by column and making sure all the rules are being met per column. rather than looking at it as a whole?
Like for the photo, we got the pivot points. Theres zeros under the pivots, and the last 1 (last pivot point) has only zeros in its column
I see that that is the pivot, but it says "some other column is not a pivot column either"
Is the 4 a free variable?
yes, column 4 is a free column
In #2, how doesnt the last coulmn have a pivot?
Theres a 1 there
is it because theres no numbers after the 1?
in #2 there are no "1"s in the last column?
Oh not just the number 4, but the entire couln 4 is free because theres numbers after the pivot
each column (except the last/augmented column) is either a pivot column (contains a pivot, corresponds to a pivot variable), or a free column (does not contain a pivot, corresponds to a free variable)
when they say "last column" they mean the augmented column [a; b; c]
oh wait
#2 is saying they dont care about the last column
only the columns prior to it
well they care about the augmented column only if it contains a pivot (as in #1) since that means there are no solutions. if it doesn't have a pivot then there are solutions
This is clicking now, x2 and x4 arent pivots, and the last column isnt a pivot!
what exactly is the augmented column?
the column after the bar
it's "augmented" because we've basically glued two different matrices together (the coefficient matrix on the left and the constants on the right)
so the last coulmn, that is 0, 0, 1
is that considered to be a pivot column
because it has a non zero
it can have a pivot, but it doesn't correspond to a variable so it doesn't really fit into the distinction about variables
so x33 isnt a pivot?



