#help-38
1 messages · Page 181 of 1
Isn’t that just a circle
Yeah I'm still kinda stuck
Yeah its a circle, I'm just struggling with converting it to rectangular form.
I would graph it onto a polar grid and then simply find out the equation as a circle
Or
U might be able to just substitute x^2 + y^2 for r^2
The part where I'm struggling is to get it in forms of just x and y, but I end up getting stuck with the 2theta and having issues with getting rid of it.
You don’t need to do that
Just remember that r is sqrt(x^2+y^2)
And also the thingy for theta
U don’t need to change the trig yet
Into that
U might need some inverse trig for the theta part iirc
Hmmm
Yeah cause ultimately I'm still left with the sin2theta that I have absolutely no idea how to work with 😅
It's like no matter what I do I get stuck with that
Well sintheta is y rt
well sintheta=y/r and costheta = x/r
dude
youre right
hold on
lemme try that
Highly doubt this is right but imma fuck around and find out
yeah nope 💀
Yeah I'm mad stuck
ur not?
except for the last line
and maybe u could skip some steps if u didnt replace r^2 with x^2+y^2 immediately in line 1
The format is supposed to be in x^2 + y^2 = r^2
send the full question pls
@gritty ether Has your question been resolved?
why you think it should be a circle?
Huh lemme try dat
i was definitely going insane for not resting enough. it really was that easy huh
💀
villegas, thank you so much
um how do i close haha
.close
Closed by @gritty ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where did I mess up?
I thought that's all you can do :o
Since x alone is 1x ... I thought...
that's you factoring the numerator right?
Ima be super fr with you
there should be a common factor to cancel out
numerator is the top part of the fraction
Okay okay thank you
I found it confusing too lol
so, what's the factorization of x^2 + x - 2?
You can't separate a variable from a number like that. They go together like a set. You can only factor like that. If they cancel out with the numerator, they always cancel out together (in a parenthasis).
But keep going. I was just mentioning that general rule.
I think I get it
You got this. We're here until the end with you.
Might be a bit
I suck at math @.@
That's okay with me.
So back to the mighty Sepdron. What's the factorization of x^2 + x - 2?
I'm avoiding the question cuz I have no clue ;~;
Do you know how to check once your done? What the four letter acronym is you need to know to check?
You use it when you BBQ sometimes...
It's silver and shiny
Tong
It starts with an F
Ffff
It also means to [mess up] a plan
FOIL. First. Outer. Inner. Last.

It's how you multiply when you multiply two binomials. So (x + a) (x + b)
Try following foil to solve it
what are the two first letters of each?
FO
First:
What are the two First letters of (x + a) and (x + b)?
Idk ;~;
Does that help?
Idk what Foil is ;~;~;~;
This
I'm walking you through the example
One step at a time
I'm here
Just remember to breathe
a and b are a and b. They are their own letters. They aren't equal to anyone else (just yet).
But the first two letters are x, right?
They are the first ones you read for each parenthesis. So you multiply them first. And they do multiply to x^2.
That's the F in FOIL.
The Outer is the outer numbers. So what are the Outer numbers of (x + a)(x +b)?.
Uhm...
(or the outside sides)
-2
That's the 3rd parenthesis
c
Heh
a*c to get theeeee
Number
Sooo 1 (x^2=1) * -2
Which is still -2
ALRIGHT
I might have it...
I'm sorry, you lost me.
I lost myself tbh ;~;
Lets use your homework. (1)x^2 (+1)x (-2) right? This is skipping forward a bit but you add the inner and outer numbers together in the end of FOIL.
What two pairs of numbers multiply to get 1?
That's one pair. What's the other one?
The only other one I think is... -2?
Nope. -1 * -1.
But since we are talking about the first set of numbers we dont usually use the double -1s. It's important to remember that for the other three numbers so remember that a negative times a negative is a positive.
How can you get -2?
-1*2! c:
And?
And?..
(1 times anything is itself....)
YES
So that says the numbers that make First and Last are either of those two pairs. And we never really use -1 * -1 so we can just put 1 * 1.
It's either (1x - 1) (1 x + 2) or (1x + 1) (1 x - 2).
Now we use the center number of x^2 + 1x - 2 to figure out which one it is
Since you add the Outer and Inner numbers, you just have to figure out which one results in a result of + 1
Here's a reminder of what Outer is.
I
Confused
I dunno this Foil stuff ;~;
I barely just learned all this simplified stuff
If you've ever played Jenga, you are missing the blocks that connect the tower to the table. You need to learn FOIL and multiplying binomials before you can answer this question. You can't go backwards (simplifying) before you learn how to go forwards (multiplying, FOIL). Do you know how to multiply a(b+c)?
And I've been a tutor for twenty years at this point (jeez never make me say this again). I've done it and seen it done. It just takes more time than one night. It's the only reason why I'm asking.
Great!
You aren't that far behind then.
You need to practice FOIL. This question will feel a lot more natural and may feel so much easier once you learn it.
You can go back to the easy example or back to your homework. First one is easy mode. Second one is harder but is quicker if you get it (not quicker if you don't).
That's here
So the first and last of an equation is the A and C, right? And the B is adding the outer and inner together.
(x + a) ( x + b)
(x * x) + (x * b) + (a * x) + (a * b)
F + O + I + L
x^2 + bx + ax + ab
x^2 + (a+b)x + ab
Basically
Factoring is figuring it out backwards
What makes (x*x)?
What makes (a*b)?
Now it's what could (a+b)x?
And it's narrowing down the options like a detective
we got the (1x*1x) already
Now it could be (-1 times 2) or (1 times -2)
Whatever it is tho
Both make (a*b)
If you have -2 as a*c
And uhm
1 as b
It'd be
-1 * 2
Cuz that equals -2
But -1+2 will equal
So when you put it formally what is it?
1, for b
Something something...
(X-1)(x+2)
And the denominator...
Same thing. What's A, B, C?
First rule
Crap
If that pesky -1 wasn't there then sure but it is
C is the one that has no x at all. The constant.
Basic numbahhh
Closer! That is x^2+x-1
Is there one?
Yup!
Exactly!
It's x^ so...
So how do we write it formally?
(X-1) (x+1)
Wait tho
If I have (x-1) (x+2) up top
And (x-1) (x+1) on bottom
Typo sorry
Would the two (x-1)'s cancel each other out?
They would!
Small second of happiness before I realized I got about... 8 questions left ;~;
You're actually not bad at all. You just syke yourself out.
Thank you thooo..
You definitely got this.
Blehhhh I fell eep in class
Practice FOIL!
You got it down
@tough moth Has your question been resolved?
What ma--And?
Mathand
5 and?
-5! c:
yup
See!
Either way but you may be able to cancel something later
Hmmm it's final solution
I'd leave it expanded because it's easier to write
1 :o
I get one more guess guh...
I'm DUMB
The greatest multiple of 12 that could equal 8 wasn't 4*4
It was 6*2 ;~;
So
?
I can divide by x
To get rid of 42x
And make it 42
To do that whole
a*c stuff
Right?
You can factor x out of both equations, right? Because a(b+c) = ab+ac?
:O I think so
So if there's an x without a number on top and on bottom, then that rule doesn't apply!
Its okay it's 03:26 for me. I understand. Lol
Exactly~
Better trick?
What can we do when C=0?
When c=0? I dunno :o
What does it mean when C=0?
Meansss it equals nothing?...
What does?
C
What's C in the equation?
Actually that's technically the right answer
Because C is the constant. The number of the equation. So C is the O of the equation.
So what can you do when you don't have a number in an equation?
Substitute it?
Orrr
Well
Yah...
You're allowed to scroll up
here
Just put an x in C's spot?...
no need
you can factor an x out whenever there is a collection that doesnt have a pesky number (our any other letters)
mmhmm
Was there an x on top too?
So how did you cross out the (x)?
I had (x+6) on top and (x+6) on bottom :O
mmhmm
So thoseeee did the thing!
mhmm mhmm
yup!
I hate
How some problems switch the letter
I'm so used to x or y
And my brain goes on autopilot XD
you can always solve it using x and then answer it in the right letter. Just remember to write it in the right substitution
?
or to simplify
Nope. You were closer in the screenshot
which one?
This
Nope
write the equation with x^2-25 factored out
yeah. Now you can cross out now or make it one big one and then cross out
Nope. You either leave the bottom two as parenthesis or you... FOIL
try it!
Submitting it?
yeah

Did you put in your final answer?
Where is the x+3?
So if 2 was in the denominator what would have been the answer?
if two is the denominator of a number what is the number?
1/2
yes. BUT we usually put (x+3) in parenthesis
mmhmm
I'm here
Wait nevahmind
I read chat
Was wrong

Wait
PH
OH
IS IT CUZ
X-2 on bottom cancels out x-2 on top??

Write it all out with all the factors before you cross them out
Then cross them out
so when you do something wrong you can backtrack
How did you get the top?
Well you factored out 2x
Yahhhh
So it should be out there but not cancelled out
Greatest factor
It's like a see-saw. There has to be equal parts on either side for to work. a 2x on the top is the only thing to cancel out a 2x on the bottom. If not, then the 2x stays.
(2x)(x - 2)
It's factored out so it stays outside
I canceled out here :o
oh man my eyes cannot see that lol
nope. B is the one with the x
I amended to x + 2. But that's how you factor out the 2x. But you can only cancel out the 2x if there is a 2x in the denominator.
try it
3 2 1
3
2
1

Yes
You keep what you divide by
I just remembered that
Thank you
Guess
What
What?

THANK YOU
Good job
good night!
Was all you
Whoops
I honestly sucks
I gotta wake up in 3 hours
Whatever I did it to myself ~^~
Woah
At some points you did :o
Then I hardly knew anything so you walked me through it closely lol
Anywho, thank you!
I eep now
Then... Coffee in morning
.close
Closed by @tough moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the local min? I already found that the global max is at E, and the global min is at T, I found the local max's which are C,E,S
the method for finding local minima will be very similar to what you did to find local maxima
I know that T has to be apart of the group since the global also counts for the local, and R is also a local, but I'm unsure about A,B,D
as we have allowed C as a local maximum, I think we can use the same logic to say that both B and D are local minima
As they "sit above" all of the points near them
If we are calling T a local minimum, do you think we should get the analogous result that A is a local maximum?
And similarly for C
Based on the fact that E counted as a local max, I made the assumption that T can be considered a local min, given that A wasn't considered a local max I think it's safe to say that it won't be considered for a local min either
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @lyric basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm clueless please help
<@&286206848099549185>
@green palm Has your question been resolved?
what do you know about triangle AED
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
You already have one channel open , I would suggest close one
i cant find the other one thats why i opened this
bro it's 2 channels down
.close
Closed by @dusk ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that if $W_1$ is any subspace of a finite dimensional vector space $V$, then there exists a subspace $W_2$ of $V$ , such that $W_1 \oplus W_2= V$
A dense set
why spam ping
We propose that $\beta_1$ is the basis of $W_1$ and that $W_1$ is a subspace of $V$. We also know that the basis of a subspace, can be extended to the basis of the larger vector space. We call this basis $\beta$. We now propose that the basis of a $W_2$ that satisfies this condition, would be $ \beta \setminus \beta_1 = \beta_2$. It follows that $\beta_1 \cap \beta_2 = \varnothing$.We have also previously proven that if $\beta_1; \beta_2$ be disjoint basis for subspaces $W_1$ and $W_2$ respectively.Then that if $\beta_1 \cup \beta_2$ is a basis for $V$, then $V = W_1 \oplus W_2$. From this it follows that if $W_1$ is any subspace of a finite dimensional vector space $V$, then there exists a subspace $W_2$ of $V$ , such that $W_1 \oplus W_2= V$
A dense set
first line is not true
well ok second line corrects it
but it should not be written that way
wdym by "appropriately"
Like say I'm considering the direct sum of the xy cordinate system, and the z-axis
not examples
Well, then how do I write it
well thats the question of the proof
how can you choose beta and beta_1 in such a way
I chose $\beta$ and $\beta_1$ such that $\beta_1 \subseteq \beta$
A dense set
We propose that $\beta_1$ is the basis of $W_1$ and that $W_1$ is a subspace of $V$. We also know that the basis of a subspace, can be extended to the basis of the larger vector space. We call this basis $\beta$. We now propose that the basis of a $W_2$ that satisfies this condition, would be $ \beta \setminus \beta_1 = \beta_2$. It follows that $\beta_1 \cap \beta_2 = \varnothing$.We have also previously proven that if $\beta_1; \beta_2$ be disjoint basis for subspaces $W_1$ and $W_2$ respectively.Then that if $\beta_1 \cup \beta_2$ is a basis for $V$, then $V = W_1 \oplus W_2$. From this it follows that if $W_1$ is any subspace of a finite dimensional vector space $V$, then there exists a subspace $W_2$ of $V$ , such that $W_1 \oplus W_2= V$
A dense set
basis can be extended
thats what I wanted to hear
@marsh forum Has your question been resolved?
Thanks
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if
i want to put cos^3x
into dx/dt
do i need to seprate them?
so i get cos^2x*cos x?
or is there a diffrent way to do it?
u guys mean chain rule?
yes
note that $\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{dx}{dy} \frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{1}{dy/dx} \frac{dy}{dt}$
south's secret twin brother
no so you just find dy/dx from y = cos^3 x normally, using the chain rule
and then the dy/dt bit should mean you multiply at the end by dy/dt
don't forget it's 1/(dy/dx) also
okay let me see if i solve it
is this related rates btw?
i have a different question but its similar
i have both x=cos^3t and y=sin^3t
and i need to find the curve length
i think this type of question is before uni right but somehow in this math course its half linear algebra and half integration
but calculus have integrations in it so yea
ah so then you need $\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy/dt}{dx/dt}$, chain rule
that makes so much more sense now
south's secret twin brother
and then replace $dx = \frac{dx}{dt} dt$
south's secret twin brother
no
that's how you find the arc length of a parametric function
the rules is ds= sqrt of (dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2 dt
so i have done it like this
i let u= cos t
and then x= u^3
so dx/du = 3u^2
and du/dt = -sin t
yeah that's equivalent to what I did
and then simplify everything and i got -3cos^2t sin t
uhhh okay i see
yeah so $\frac{d}{dt} \cos^3 t = 3 \cos^2 t \cdot (-\sin t)$
south's secret twin brother
yea
y = sin^3 t
should be the same thing but other wise
so 3 sin^2t * cos t
but what i wonder
in this type of question
is the chain rule always relevant?
or can there be other rule that need to be applied ?
or i am wrong?
yep that's correct
yeah, so whenever you have a composition of two functions, you need the chain rule
so y = sin^3 t is f(g(t)) where f(t) = t^3, g(t) = sin t
basically the chain rule is the most frequently applied rule
it's just everywhere
well not for linear algebra xD
xd
i have a another question which i wanna understand fast
oh lol, but that's a totally different area of maths
yea in my opinion its much more fun and easier to understand
anyways
i have issue with divergence
i dont get the grasp of it
the 5 b is easy but a) in the other hand
i dont understand how to think
the only thing i understand is i need to seprate it
so i use A and B
oh well 1/(x^2 + 2x) < 1/x^2, and the integral of 1/x^2 from 1 to infinity is convergent
wait
there's the 0 to 1 part
no?
yeah so 5a) also diverges, can't explain why
uhh okay
if you really wanted to, use partial fractions to integrate the indefinite integral
you get $\frac{1}{2} \left(\ln(x) - \ln(x + 2) \right)$
south's secret twin brother
but then ln 0 is undefined, so diverges
yeah it says to find the value if it is convergent
might as well integrate
Closed by @terse portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nah neighbouring languages are close enough
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im a bit unsure if im doing it wrong
im struggeling with part a)Decide P(x is more or 3)
i dont know where to start
like do i look for the x value? if so then i must do P(X=1)+P(X=2)+P(X=3)=0.10+0.20+0.10=0.40
right?
oh alr cool
you need help with the second one?
im struggeling with this one too
yes please
i have to explain why this is a real(?) equation
can you translate?
let me translate the text theres a bit one sec
here the second one is probably asking for the value of a, so you need to sum up all the probabilities P(x=t) ones and it should be equal to 1
itll form a linear equation and on solving that you should get your answer
There is 7 books, 4 childrenbooks and 3 thrillers
Lise picks 3 books for her trainride randomly.
She gets told that each possibility of picking 2 childrenboooks and 1 thriller can be solved with this equation:
Explain why this is true.
yus i did this:
P(2 childrenbooks and 1 thriller)=....
im assuming K(4,2) is choosing 2 out of 4 aka 4C2
ok so you want 2 children books and there are 4 of them in total, so ways to get any two of those is 4c2
yes i think k(4,2) is 4 childrenbooks but i only need/want to pick 2
k is combinatorics
if im not mistaken
im struggeling with understand why i add k(4,2)*k(3,1)
i believe i devide with k(7,3) because i only need 3 books and the total of the books is 7 combined
mb device died
nws nws
you are correct there
you also need 1 thriller at the same time so you multiply ways with which you can select 1 thriller out of the 3 present
hence the 3c1
oh so im just multiplying my possibilites of picking the books with eachother to find the combined possibility of finding wanted books to then devide it by the total books needed?
yeah
so whenever you need 2 things together (they use an and) you multiply
and whenever theres a choice like a or b you add
and the reason i write p(2 childrenbooks and 1 thriller) is because the 2c and 1t is essentially my x value i want to find?
oooh
thank you C:
yeah
theys why they used and there
if theyd used 2 children or 1 thriller then the answer wouldve been different
(if you wanna know what it would be just ping!)
imma bite im curious C: i would like to know
im gonna assume we choose 3 books in total still
oh wait nvm it wont work with 2 children or 1 thriller with the current data
oh alr XD thank you the help tho
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@graceful egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @graceful egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Small doubt
yeah
Closed by @sonic oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a proposal that might contradict Virgagnon's theorem.
Just a heads up: Virgagnon's theorem states that if you take the midpoints of the four sides of any convex or non-convex quadrilateral, they will always form a parallelogram.
I have this counterexample:
A non-convex quadrilateral ABCD such that AB = CD and (AB)//(CD). I chose, I, J, K and L the respective midpoints of [AB], [BC], [CD] and [DA].
Using the previous information, ABDC would be a parallelogram thus his diagonals [AD] and [BC] would intercept at their midpoints. If so, then J and L would be on top of each other. So, [BC] has J as midpoint.
We can prove then that K, J and A are colinear by midpoint theorem in triangles ABC and BCD and so, this cant be a parallelogram
is there anything that can be considered false in this?
@undone sierra Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what about non convex quadrilaterals
ur statement wouldnt necessarily imply then
i think they call it a crossed quadrilateral
u said in ur world, when u call ABCD a quadrilateral
this means each side intersects the other side at one point
for example [AB] and [AD] intersect at A
is this what u meant?
in non convex quadrilaterals this is not a necessary case
concave quadrilaterals are not alqays in that form
always*
convexity and concavity are a bit too technical
heres a simple definition of a concave quadrilateral
it helps indicate them
if u take two points inside the quadrilateral and connect them with a line
if that line somehow ends up outside the quadrilateral
its concave
if the line never does, its convex
convexity and concavity was a whole huge lesson for us
i couldnt even keep up
thats not really a part of what defines a quadrilateral
whats a quadrilateral by ur definition
wdym do not start with a quadrilateral
literally it is a quadrilateral what i stated
some call it crossed quadrilateral too
the virgagnon's theorem works too with a lot of examples of the type of quadrilateral i proposed too
i js dont see why it works with the one i stated
indeed it is
in quadrilateral ABCD
angles are ABC, BCD, DAB, CDA
u cant really tell first off
also
js google it
Oh i think u misunderstood
when i mentioned abt angle ABC
i was talking abt its exterior
not interior
u can find everything online abt crossed quadrilaterals
youll understand urself
thanks for ur time though, man
i cant deny that ur right, this is very old and probably couldve been discussed before
i wouldnt be surprised if someone proved me wrong
but u dont seem to convince me where im at fault though
sorry for wasting your time.
wouldnt call it a waste of time so thanks for this discussion
<@&286206848099549185> ?
<@&286206848099549185>
hi
this
@undone sierra Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Reading your question
Your proposed counterexample to Virgagnon’s theorem, involving a non-convex quadrilateral ABCD with AB equal to CD and AB parallel to CD, seems to misinterpret the geometry of the situation. While you suggest that J and L, the midpoints of sides BC and DA, would coincide because the diagonals of the quadrilateral meet at their midpoints, this conclusion is incorrect. Even though ABCD may have special symmetry, the midpoints of the sides will still form a parallelogram according to Virgagnon’s theorem. The confusion likely comes from misunderstanding the positions of the midpoints, but this doesn’t provide a valid counterexample. Virgagnon’s theorem holds for both convex and non-convex quadrilaterals.
Virgagnons theorem still holds
@undone sierra
@undone sierra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is 2x√5 the same as 2√5 x?
sure, multiplication is commutative
Closed by @fair oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
To download "You Get Me" visit http://smarturl.it/tfiTuness1
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
they already defined that z is z1/z2
A dense set
and we have to show that it is equal to this ?
I suppose so?
👍
I'm not too sure
i guess that is what they meant
i thought by quotient we have to divide z1 by z2 and write down the "quotient"
which sounded dumb
so..
thank you
.close
Closed by @sonic oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
show that $ze^{i \theta}$ is equivalent geometrically to rotating a vector $z$ by theta degree
@wraith hinge
A dense set
let me try xD
Closed by @sonic oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
boy im not getting a single question today
1-4 a
"explain the meanig of this relation in a vector diagram"
if $dz$ stands for the differential of $z$ here ,I swear I'mma explode
A dense set
i understand that jz means rotating the z vector 90 degrees in anticlock wise direction
I don't think I know enough to help, sorry
Are you sure $j$ isn't just a real number here
A dense set
Bruh. Using j instead of i is diabolical
engineering textbook
I feel like you could just differentiate both sides wrt theta to start
Hmm, that's an interesting question
dy = f '(x) . dx means that when you have a point (x0, y0) and you apply a little change to x0, like you add a dx to x0
the new value of y will be automatically y0 + dy
and that amount of change in the function "dy" is related to the amount of change in the x "dx"
similar here, imagine you got a vector z0 with constant length A and making an angle θ0 with +x axis
if you rotate it counter-clockwise by a small angle dθ
automatically the vector will change
becomes z0 + dz
dz being amount of change due to the change in the angle "dθ"
and the relation says that z0 will change by exactly jz * amount of change in θ
relation tells you that if you grab a cmplx number and you change its angle by a small amount
the new cmplx number will simply be the original + dz
dz is the change that occurs due to the small change in the angle
drawing is not to scale, dθ is very small, infinitesimal
the smaller, the more accurate the relation holds
one thing
in the relation
dz = j z d (theta)
dz and d(theta) are vectors right ?
okay
so change is z is perpendicular to z
thats hard to visualise
i kinda get it
i will come back to this later
thank you
you can do this
,, dz = jz d\theta = e^{j\frac{\pi}{2}} \cdot A , e^{i\theta} , \cdot d\theta = A , d\theta \cdot e^{j(\theta + \frac{\pi}{2})}
Milena
the angle is so small that the arc is almost a straight line
so yes, perpendicular
yw
anw gotta head out for school now
exactly,that would make dtheta vector right
if that was the case,it would make sense to me
