#help-38
1 messages · Page 169 of 1
Idk ahah
icannotdoanymorecauchy
then refine the limit as $x \to 0^{-}$, so ${j \to -\infty}$
icannotdoanymorecauchy
sorry for confusion
@stoic burrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stoic burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is this wrong
I’m gonna crash out I swear this is the right answer
that's actually weird 
And the teacher says it’s 100% wrong
well g(x) is not continuous at x=-1
Yes
its just 2
ye
g(-1) right
Ok yeah but how does it get to 2 as it’s a limit and it describes the motion as it’s approaching
bacc
that's not what's going on here
g(f(x)) evaluates to 2 for all x > 2
it's like taking a limit of a constant function
$g\circ f$ is constant (on $(2,\infty)$)
layla is not harper
It’s because it’s not approaching
It just hits the same value of 2 over and over again
When it approaches from right
Ahhhhh okkk thanks

Closed by @quick bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I thought about it, you were right
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if (x-5)^2+(y-2)^2=7^2, find the maximum of x^2+y^2
how fo you do this?
try plotting this
i dont know differentiation
complete the square then
In 2D, what does this (x-5)^2+(y-2)^2=7^2 represent?
circlr
Great
and whats the eulidean distance?
huh
d^2 = (x1-x2)^2 + (y1-y2)^2 right?
where d is the distance between (x1,y1) and (x2,y2)
so, you can think of x^2 + y^2 as distance from origin
hm
So can you rephrase the problem in context of distance from origin?
squared is the thing you want
so its 49+29+14sqrt29=78+14sqrt29?
should be the answer for max x^2+y^2
Closed by @exotic pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for positive integers a,b find (a,b) such that
$$\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}=\frac{192}{4009}$$
Skill_Issue
i tried to combine the fractions and make a diophantine equation but got $$xy+y\frac{4009}{192}-x\frac{4009}{192}=0$$
Skill_Issue
you gotta factorize 4009, that would be huge progress
so you can directly correlate b-a to 192 and ab to 4009
I cant find the factors mentally, so id leave it to you 
19×221
I guess you are done ¯_(ツ)_/¯
221-19=202 so none exist
wait no, 221 is divisible by 13
4009 isnt
its 211
oh yea
so 19,211 is the pair
wait what
211-19 = 192
and 211*19 = 4009
Closed by @exotic pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not related to maths, but I need help from someone who studies.
when solving a question, I do mistakes sometimes. but my matter is that, suppose I apply a wrong concept in middle of solution. and I before that I had already applied another wrong concept in beginning of solution. and somehow those two wrong concepts cancel out each other, and I end up with correct answer. and when I recheck, I realise that I've done a huge blunder. but I'm seeing this trend in various subjects, and it happens all the time. I do more than one mistake and I get right answer.
and why I get right answer, is due to those complement things. like 1/sin60=cosec60, and sin60=cos30, etc and more things like this in subjects other than maths.
it happens in my physics related subjects. but concept is still wrong, and solution should be treated as wrong
The only logical way for me to solve this problem is by knowing the definition of what you are using at that moment.
usually I'd think a teacher would mark you wrong
or you would notice the mistake within other questions
in my experience most of the time I wouldn't get the right answer making mistakes
I would also suggest checking for solutions if they have them
I solve a question with full enthusiasm and get correct answer. when I check it after some time, (maybe few hrs or days), I realise that I've understood the question incorrectly. but my concepts are still wrong! I don't want this kind of luck thing 😭
as long as you have the solutions
I would probably check more regularly
but if you do enough practise examples this shouldn't be so much of a problem
because when you do get a question wrong you should be able to identify the error at that time
all in all the best way to avoid it is probably to be more proficient with both practise and checking your solutions imo
.close
Closed by @sly basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me in this please
@hoary glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have the sequence an+1=root(1+2a1) where a1 is 1
Do you mean $a_{n + 1} = \sqrt{1 + 2a_n}$, rather?
@whole coral
yes
Can you help me solve this problem
.
Maybe induction might help?
Good idea but how do i use in this example
I would play around with the first few terms, see if you notice any order in those
Then if you suspect that it's increasing/decreasing, try and make an induction argument with that and use one of the examples you found as your base case
Yes i tried that
And i am sure that it is increasing
But i just don't know how to continue 😢
@pulsar dust hiii 
hello chartbit 
And, well, if you think it's increasing, then for the induction argument, assume, say, that $a_{n - 1} < a_n$, and from there, try and show that $a_n < a_{n + 1} (= \sqrt{1 + 2a_n})$
@whole coral
Maybe we can do it together step by step?
I found a2 to be root3
And a3 root(1+2root3)
So a3 is bigger than a2
So how do i continue?
Have you done proof by induction before?
is it bounded above (the sequence)
nvm ignore i was responding to wrong channel oops
Well, let's take this as the base case, it's pretty alright that a2 = sqrt{3} > 1 = a1
The idea is that we now wanna show that if for a given $n$, we have $a_{n - 1} < a_n$, that we also then must get that $a_n < a_{n + 1}$
@whole coral
For which, it's actually quite easy, remember how you recursively define the sequence here, so the argument would be something like-
We assume that $a_{n - 1} < a_n$. Now,
[
a_{n + 1} = \sqrt{1 + 2a_n} = \ldots
]
@whole coral
Ok
Finishing off the proof should hopefully be alright, it's practically almost immediate and there are few hints I can think of that don't immediately give it all away 
There's only really one place you can make use of the fact that a_{n - 1} < a_n...
No, you don't, you literally want to have a sequence of steps here that lead to $a_{n + 1} = \ldots > a_n$
@whole coral
That's induction, using the truth of the statement a_{n - 1} < a_n to then get to a_n < a_{n + 1}
Maybe an other hint?
chartbit cant relaly hint anymore without giving the answer
it is just performing the induction now
Ok
are u confused how to do induction ?
I will say, to think about the square root and how it behaves...
(you can, but you really don't need to-)
that is your RTP essentially
(but be very careful, that requires justification, and ideally should depend on the fact that a_n > a_{n - 1}, something you haven't yet used)
Ok i think i got it
Yes i got it
I think i did it correctly?
Pls confirm if i did it right
.close
Closed by @next vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Factorize $$z^3+z^2-4z+6$$ which has a root of $1+i$
Good
I got $(z-1-i)(z^2+2z+iz+3i-3)$, is it able to factorize it further?
Good
do you notice anything about the coefficients
of the polynomial
||if all coefficeints are real, then complex roots occur in conjugate pairs||
Not really. I tried quadratic formula, and it gave some negative imaginary inside squareroot.
this is just a theorem so probably should be familiar with it
Closed by @delicate belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah seems fine
i think you meant |a_n - 0| rather than |a_n - a| for the first line
Yeah, sorry
Thanks
.close
Closed by @tardy hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nw!
wrong way around
it's N_epsilon'
since you're trying to show that for every epsilon', sqrt(a_n) < epsilon' after some N_epsilon'
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did you have a question?
@lavish nebula Has your question been resolved?
not really. im just trying to figure out how to solve these two
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
i don't know where to begin
Ok, you can begin the first by completing the square and getting a circle formula in the form of (x-k)^2 + (y-h)^2 = r^2
From there you know the radius and center of the circle.
yes i did finish upto that point
If you have two tangent circles what can you say about their centers and the tangent point?
equal radius
No
the distance from the center to both tangents are equal
Both tangents? There's only one
Specifically what can you say about the line from the center of circle C to the tangent point, and the line from the other circle to the tangent point?
the distance between the centers is equal to the sum of radius
wait so
So if you make a line equation using the center and the tangent point, what other piece of information can you use to determine the circle C?
create an equation then find perpendicular distance?
Perpendicular distance to what?
the equation of that line would be the radius subtracted from the total distance between the centers
im sorry im a bit confused
The equation of the line would be y = mx + b
yes
We don't yet know the distance between the centers
Because we only know one of them
never mind
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
And we know that two different points are equal distance from the center
.reopen
.reopen
equal?
So we have three unknowns, h, k, r for circle C
Both the tangent point and the point (4,0) are on the circle
yes
So they are equal distance from the center of the circle
yeap
So we have 3 unknowns, r,k,h for circle C
And we have three equations, the line from the center of the first circle through the tangent point, the distance formula to (0,4), and the distance formula to the tangent point
You think you got it from here?
There's still a lot of math math math and number crunching, but conceptually at least is the path to the solution clear?
Hmmm
I have a notion give me a moment
So you can construct a circle that passes through any three points you choose
yes
However, I think touching means tangency
Which means the center is on the line x = 3
i was wondering if we can make an equation out of the given information so we can substitute the options to see which one satisfies the equantion
You can find the entire circle equation with just these two points.
I think
Yes
So notice that k = 3, h = r.
So a distance formula from (1, -2) to the center at (3, h) will equal h
That's one equation in one variable
Then you just plug in each of the points and see if it satisfies the equation
yes
You can use a symmetry argument to avoid all math
Circles are symmetric about any line passing through its center
So in particular it is symmetric about x = 3
Which of the points in the multiple choice satisfy (1, -2) when reflected about x = 3?
unfortunately i gotta show the math;-;
lol ok you're right i'll try that
actually i got two more problems can you help with that as well?
I need to cook myself some lunch, so I will be a little more terse, but I'll be happy to stick around for a bit
For 8, the key is the chord will be perpendicular to the radius
For 10 you can get the circle equation in the same way as problem 15 (5?) from the last set
i know the length of the chord and the center of the circle but i dont know how that helps me determine the radius
The radius passing through the center of the chord (and therefore the center of the diameter) is perpendicular to it
but i don't know the coordinates of the center of the chord how does that help me with the distance?
The center of the chord is the center of the other circle
yes
Big circle C, little circle D.
but there is still a portion left after the point of intersection between the center of chord and the center of the circle
A radius of C passes through the center of D
The diameter of D that is a chord of C is perpendicular to this
Giving 2 points on C
Third point on C is at the end of the radius from before.
Well, actually you don't need the third my bad
You just need the radius, and once you have either endpoint of the diameter you have everything
ah alright. thanks a lot, sorry for stalling you, you can go cook some lunch up for yourself :)
closing the ticket
.close
Closed by @lavish nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Idk what to do next in part ii
can u find a value of x such that the derivative yields -51
the answer i got in the calc was in decimals
ok so we know the derivative is a quadratic right?
yea
3x^2-18x+30 from what u wrote
we can simplify this by just factorising
3(x^2-6x+10)
but the values of x would still be in decimals
yuh
or if we factorise it 3(x^2-6x-7)
what is the vertex of this quadratic
recalling that vertex of any quadratic is found when x = -b/2a if the quadratic takes on the form of ax^2 + bx + c
you will realise the vertex y value of this quadratic is above y=-51
therefore it cannot reach it
which suggests ...
so theres no points
yep
at least from a glance, i havent done this on paper so maybe i made a calculation error in my head
wait how does this show that there are no points on the graph that show the normal that is parallel to the line
the line gradient is 1/51 right?
yea
so therefore the normal of the tangent at some point of the curve f(x) has to be 1/51
the normal of the normal = gradient of tangent at some point of the curve
so the gradient or derivative has to produce a function value that is -51
so if there exists this point, we should be able to find f'(x) = -51
however, analysing f'(x) as a quadratic will show that the lowest value it will take greater than -51
therefore it will never reach -51
hence this function value doesn't exist
and hence this point doesnt exist
how is this supposed to be written down as working
especially the part where f'(x) lowest value is greater than 51
i mean -51
ie:
"The gradient of a line parralel to the given line will take have value of 1/51. If this is the normal to a tangent at a point on the curve f(x), then the gradient value at that point must take on -51 to satisfy the fact that gradient tangent * gradient normal = -1
Equivelantly, we must find a value of x such that f'(x) = -51
however, f'(x) = 3x^2 - 18x - 21, analysing the vertex which is (fill in the blank here), the y value of the vertex is > -51 and the quadratic is concave up as its leading coeffcient is positive.
Therefore, the derivative will always be greater than -51 which means it cannot be the normal to a line parralel to the line 51y-x=19
Hence this point does not exist"
Closed by @solid kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I'm currently practicing finding eigenvectors, I'd like someone to review my solution so I can see if I'm doing it right
careful: you should have - (-1)(4 - lambda) = 4 - lambda in the 4th line of your working
It's + because -1 is the third element
wait what
the determinant of (-1, 4 - lambda) (-1, 2)
Ah yea
$= -1 \cdot 2 - (-1)(4 - \lambda)$
higher's secret brother
I know so that's not the issue I'm talking about now
Ok so is it correct?
oh I got that cuz -(4-lambda) = -4+lambda
The term is multiplied with -1
Oh wait lemme try again
and you multiply by -1 again
yeah try it again on a new piece of paper
yeah miraculously your eigenvalues are still correct
,w {{2, 0, 1}, {-1, 4, -1}, {-1, 2, 0}} eigenvalues and eigenvectors
I assumed I already had 4-lambda in my mind so my steps seemed correct after lol
Ok thanks tho
so the lambda = 1 part is fine
lambda = 2 is not correct cause of a really dumb mistake, don't beat yourself up haha
$2x_2 = x_1$ means that $x_1 = 2t, x_2 = t$ and so on
higher's secret brother
so (2, 1, 0) not (1, 2, 0)
why did you introduce t here
that's the general form, cause any $t \ne 0$ will also be an eigenvector
higher's secret brother
any scalar multiple except 0 of the eigenvector works
so if I need x1 I substitute x2 with t?
well you can actually just let x2 = 1, so x1 = 2
then (1, 2, 0) * t
that's only one eigenvector
there are infinitely many
say, (2, 4, 0) also works
I did get one out of infinite eigenvectors for the eigenvalue
I don't understand why it's not correct tho
I'm saying it's correct
also another mistake in lambda = 3
you get to -2(x1) + (x2) = 0
again, if you plug in x1 = 1, you get x2 = 2 and x3 = 1
so you should have (1, 2, 1)
or (1/2, 1, 1/2) also works
oh yeah you did the same kind of mistake in all 3
yep
so all my evecs are wrong?
ok so I don't need to change anything right? 😭
no, you need to change how you approach things like -2(x1) + (x2) = 0
or did I get the right answer but in the wrong approach
that's your only mistake
everything apart from that is correct
just sub in 1 value for x1
get x2 and x3
then multiply what you got by $t$, where $t \ne 0$ ofc
higher's secret brother
So I multiply x2 and x3 with t?
And x1 would be any value, say 1?
and x1 also, but yes
yeah you can choose any value that isn't zero
npnp
Wait holon lemme try again
@dapper swift 😭
How does t help me make my eigenvector
great so your eigenvector is (t, t/2, 0), when t is not 0
ok but it's not 2,1,0 tho
@real birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with boolean expressions
Using the Identities and Laws of Boolean Algebra, simplify the following expressions. List
the specific law used for every simplification.
A∗B∗~C+A∗B+A∗C+A
Using the distributive law we know that your thing is equal to A * (B*~C + B + C + 1). It is basically like taking A out and since A*1=A, we leave a 1 in the last place. The null law states that 1+A=1, which means that the entire thing in the brackets simplifies to just 1. we are therefore left with A*1 which is equal to A by the identity law
oh
i started out with t3
@jolly lion Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, for solving a question, I used this website to build my explanation for what I was trying to do. I'm not sure if I worded it correctly, though, since my explanation of it isn't really in matrix form. Anyone know a better way for me to word this or is this just fine?
@winged epoch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just wanted somebody to quickly tell me if my answer is correct or not. Only question on a quiz that I am unsure of.
If you sub x = 1 what do you get for the angle marked as 15(x+1)?
Vertically opposite angles
Sorry, I figured it out I no longer need help. My bad for opening a help channel.
.close
Closed by @hushed trail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No problem
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is p^r the size of the normalizer of P?
no
:(
why do they write it like this then???
why not just skip to the last part
because we know that the normaliser would form a subgroup and subgroup always divides the order of the group so we could just skip to the |N(P)| * k no?

???
if all they want to use is that p doesnt divide k then its only necessary to say that P is contained in N(P)
idk what the proof is gonna do though
yea so true
no
Q is sylow but not necessarily a conjugate of P
and i dont get whats clear about the following line :(
yea but S contains all sylow p groups
no isnt S defined as containing all sylow p groups
no
any group action partitions the set being acted on into orbits
same with Q acting on S by conjugation
sorry
Q conjugacy class of each Pi means
QPiQ^-1 or PiQPi^-1?
im guessing the first?
{q P_i q^-1 | q \in Q}
ty
one of these equivalence classes must contain only a single Sylow
p-subgroup, say Pj.
how did they get this
because the conjugacy classes are powers of p
yea but wouldnt they all be the same order
no
why :(
what does this mean anyway
because the orbits don't have the same cardinality
do the other conjugacy equivalence classes contain multiple sylow subgroups? why?
what is the cardinality of an orbit
|orbit|
number of elements in the orbit
how do we know that
conjugacy classes don't all have the same size
yea
we have orbits of different sizes but how do we know one has a conjugacy class of exactly one
they all must be powers of p
yes
S has cardinality k
the conjugacy classes partition S
p doesnt divide k
so p does not divide the cardinality of at least one conjugacy class
so one conjugacy class is p^0 = 1
wait first
the cosets of the normalizer of P is the number of elements in S?
which is exactly the idex of N(P) or in this case k
but what if say we have 8 groups of order 9 where we are looking at sylow groups of order 3 (3^2 is the sylow 3 group). then wouldnt we have like 2 groups in the last partition
or 2 groups of 1 im not sure whats happening
how do we know we would have exactly 1 partition of 1 at the end
for instance yea
cant we have 2 orbits of size 1?
sure
oh
but any orbit of size 1 would satisfy the condition they talk about which is to keep itself invariant under conjugation by Q (normalizer of Q)?
it means its a Q fixed point
elements of Q are fixed points for the Pi under conjugation
no
:(
theres some P_j which is a fixed point under the Q-action
thats what it means for the orbit to be a singleton
theres some i such that elements of Q are fixed points for the Pi under conjugation
no
when a group G acts on a set X, the G-fixed points of X are X^G = {x in X | gx = x for all g in G}
here, G = Q and X = S
the action is conjugation
the Q fixed points (under conjugation) of some Pi is Pi
Pi is a fixed point of Q?
of the Q-action
Closed by @river willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
I can but I'm preparing for a test myself you can ping helper role and someone will surely help you
I can help a bit
Alr
So x intercepts is just where the line crosses the x axis
yea
Sign of the leading coefficient depends on whether the function points up or down
Least possible degree is how many times it “curves”
Sorry I mean based on
Don’t count the curves
like sometimes it doesn't curve
Yea idk how I'd graph that on desmos
Plot a random x^3
it stops then moves
Alr
It has 2 turning points
Plus 1 shouldn't that be the leading coefficient?
Or degree
The minimum degree is 3
And it's positive
X intercepts at -4, -0.5, and 1
m sry i rly gtg :(
Ur good dw
👍👍
Ty tho
No problem
@glad grotto Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Investigate the effect of the term on simple interest amortized auto loans by finding the monthly payment and the total interest for a loan of $15,000 at
9 7/8%
interest if the term is the following. (Round your answers to the nearest cent.)
(a) three years
(b) four years
(c) five years
@north plaza Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @north plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can we add a 1x4 matrix to a 4x1 one?
no
you can perform matrix multiplication iirc
Yeah I got confused by MATLAB sorry
We are required to solve some question but it didn't make sense
I have 1 question, in transformation functions would a horizontal/vertical strecth or shift come first
Closed by @trim cradle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
in transformation functions would a horizontal/vertical strecth or shift come first
I don't believe it matters
but I assume it would be notation of the order assigned
so like h(x)=f(1/3(x-3))-1
it doesent matter if i strecth by 3 or move right 3 first
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, someone could help me to understand this Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE)?
Basically I want to know why the dt disappear when I do the integral and the ds becomes s(t).
the dt disappears because it's been integrated
you integrate 1ds
^
and then the integral of 1 ds is just s or s(t) in this case for notational purposes
seperation of variables is pretty confusing some times because u kind of multiply by dx and stuff.. but it works so u gotta just accept it lmao
@plush breach Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plush breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
an example
john dawton
like the bottom of the slide says this rule is not so true
so idk why i need to know it
pls i cant understand it
like is it trying to say there is diffferent elements because of atoms
this feels like it isn't that well fitted for math discord
oh
every element has a different average mass per atom. but individual atoms of the same element can have different masses due to being different isotopes
so elements are defined by the number of protons
Oh
but u have isotopes and so on
oh the isotopes make this rule not true
isotopes have a different number of neutrons thus a different mass
Ok
theres also if u have a different number of electrons, electrons have mass as well though its a thousandth or so of a neutron
with different number of neutrons and electrons they have different properties as well
dalton wouldn't know about this because it all averages out over an uncountably large amount of atoms
what
are we going into chemistry history D:
lets not 😄
surely it's countable... /j
carbon is 99% carbon 12 and 1% carbon 13 making an average mass per atom of 12.01 g per mol. there are 6 x 10^23 atoms in a mol so an individual mol randomly having a few more or a few less atoms of 13C would not affect the average mass per atom very much (it would have to be a substantial difference in isotope composition)
so it's a distinction which is very important for individual atoms and less so for the amount of substance you can see
i see that is cool
well i would say that they have similar mass but the key point here is the quantifier all at the start
@echo jasper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is x^3 - 2x + 1 not an odd function? what does the C value change?
no
then that answers your question
in these questions it says use property f(-x) = f(x) to determine if its even and in another question to determine if its odd use f(-x) = -f(x), will it always be these two? f(-x) = -f(x) for odd and f(-x) = f(x) for even?
ok thanks
@mystic goblet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont want to just substitite it. I want to manipulate the question itself can anyone teach me how?
multiply the second equation by 2/3
I did but
Thats fucking clever
👍 problem should solve itself from there
@inner seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @inner seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
yo
yo
I got u
tanks
ya
a sqaure b sqaure equal c 2
c sqaure
but the area thing
and perimeter
is confusing
A square is a quadrilateral with 4 equal sides
Do you know what perimeter means
So if each side is equal and the total is 100
👍👍👍👍🔥
Wait
i got 18
Wait no
- something
replace 10 with 25 btw
ok
15 stays?
Yes
ok
No
o
ye
625-225
👍👍👍
Square root
Closed by @gloomy garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was dead asleep when I was doing this and got this entire section wrong.
I just need someone to double check my answers on the orange sticky note if it’s correct, and which one is wrong. Thank you!
Grr
@rich stag Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Im here now...daddys here...
Ok so
SO WE GPTTA DO
PARENTHESIS FIRST OK
WE GONNA DO PEMDAS WITH THIS
Alr bro
I got you
OH
Uh
So we gotta divide though because its a fraction i think
Well we about to find those
So y is
Y is kind of yknow rude and standoffish
So when we take
Stay with me now
I hate math with letters when am i gonna use this
LETS USE PHTOPHTOMAYH
PHTO
fart
Vrother use phtomath
<@&268886789983436800>

This is unnecessary. Keep things civil here.
You're muted for the day because of this
If you don't know how to help somebody please try to avoid clogging up their channel.
I did know i was about to tell her bro
Seems a lot like you're just trolling in the help channels based on your chat history
If you are that's pretty shitty.
If you're not you should really evaluate whether you're explaining things as well as you think you are.
You'll survive.
Guys im feeling targeted...
You do come across disingenuous here.
@rich stag Has your question been resolved?
mitch…..
i can help u
horizontal asymptotes are just based on the power
for question 4
Yayaya
wat
since the x is going towards infinity you’re just trying to determine what the graph is doing as it reaches infinity
aka long run
the horizontal asymptote of 2 is just 0
bc when you take the square root of the denominator and make it (4x^2 + 3)^1/2
ur essentially simplifying to 4x + 3^1/2
and since 4x is leading term in denominator
and 2x is leading term in numerator
you can compare degrees
and if the degrees are equal (they’re both 1 here) then the horizontal asymptote is 0
wait
no it’s not 0
Fr
it’s the ratio of the coefficients
okay i had the right idea i was just side tracked
so the horizontal asymptote should be 2/4
i heard ur suppose to divide every term by |x| and -|x|
absolute value?!😨
Umm no
umm I don't think I got it right Omg
Oh ya it is 2x/|2x| and negative
i’m not locked in enough
so 1 for the infinity things
and neg
idk why we divide everything by the degree of the denominator
<@&286206848099549185>
wat
<@&286206848099549185>
@rich stag Has your question been resolved?
@rich stag Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
number 55
i got for the tangent line
1.354x + 0.646
which is correct
i verified in desmos
but i now need the normal line
how can i find the normal line from this
im not used to decimals
tangent line slope * normal line slope = -1
multiply?
so then
1.354 + 1 = 1/normal line slope
did i do that right
$1.354 + 1 = \frac 1 {normal line slope}$
Devil Wears Prada
+1?
Devil Wears Prada
then just use point slope formula to get normal line