#help-38
1 messages · Page 133 of 1
convert the percent increase to a flat amount
there's really no good reason to do just a flat amount over a percent increase since it just involves more steps
i want to always add the same flat amount, for example 10
That was it
i cannot use the total of value2 in some way to counteract the fact that im only adding 10?
as in, the more difference between 10 and value2, the 10 becomes higher?
wtf does it mean for the "10 to become higher"?
haha
i want to add to value2 increments of 10, then a formula to grab that 10, and check how big value2 is, and multiply that 10, for instance
please write this out in equation form
so even though im just adding 10, after going to the formula it became 3822 so the % increase is the same
if i knew the equation form for it i wouldnt be asking here
no as in using math notation
not using an actual working formula
just assume there is a working function, and call it something
and then use that to describe your problem
a x b+10 =/= a x (bx2)+10, i want a function that gets my +10 and checks the total value of b to multiply my +10 so that a x b+10 = a x (bx2)+10(which is not 10 now)
the formula that i want is not to multiply a * b but to convert the same value (10) in relation to b, so that it goes up with b
@fiery cedar Has your question been resolved?
dawg you just defined a percent change
percent = a(b+10)/ab
n = 2ab*percent - 2ab
n being the variable 10 you referred to earlier
would a x ( (a*0.1) x b ) not work? every point of b is 10% of a
no cuz adding 10 is not the same as increasing by 10% for all a and b
how could i do that then? make every point of b be 10% of a
so if i add 10 to b, i would be adding 100% of a, and so on
@fiery cedar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fiery cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is C-part notP??
its a second year math course
intro to logic for computer science
oh, are you a math major?
which language?
nope im a comp sci major
?
Closed by @livid yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do this?
Lol I mean u could do it kinda roundabout and use sin(90-30) and same for cos
Or get tan(60) - sec(60)
Using 90-30 for either or both of those or none of those
@loud cosmos Has your question been resolved?
@loud cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
iv gotten to
sin (x/2) + cos (x/2)
like it simplifies to that
from there how do i solve
<@&286206848099549185>
Hmmm
seems like you can get an explicit value for x from the very first line
As far as I remember the answer is B correct?
tell them how to get there, not the answer
find cot (x/2)
if you know cot x you know tan x
and if you know tan x you can find cot (x/2)
then draw a triangle
alternatively sin x + cos x = sqrt(1 + sin 2x) on some interval that you should find
I mean it is in the form of sin(A+B) and cos(A+B), simplifying this will give you something in cosx or sinx
he's gotten to that part already
.
Square this expression
he's referring to this
you end up with that
exactly
as we know cotx, we can figure out the problem
it might be helpful to remember that
1/ tanx = cot x
but we already know what cot x equals to :D
once you find your value for x, just plug it in and simplify
don't overthink it and good luck!
its non calculator
so like
if it were calcualtor u could have just graphed both
and gotten
Closed by @outer cradle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
4 3 5
Q2) Simplify √81 − 8 √216 + 15 √32 + √225.
4 raised to√81 − 8 3 raised to√216 + 15 5 raised to√32 + √225.
this is complete question
yes sir what to donow
??
sir opposite
4 is power of √81
i mean like √81 raised to 4
all of them like this opposite
yes sir
but 4 is before √81
like that
$\sqrt[4]{81}-8\sqrt[3]{216}+15\sqrt[5]{32}+\sqrt{225}$
kheerii
this is what OP means
yes this
this i mean
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
how comfortable are you with radicals?
that flew above my head i am very bad at maths that's why i am learning from experts like you
kheerii
15 sir
ok
when you're finding the value of a square root, you're effectively answering the question,
"what number, when multiplied to itself, gives me the value 225?"
the other roots are completely analogous to this
ah, well, that's a shortcut that you have been taught
to find out the square root of any number ending with 25
can you tell me $\sqrt{36}$?
kheerii
6
kheerii
the way to interpret this is to ask the question,
"what number, when cubed, gives me the value 8?"
2
kheerii
can you do that now?
what?
is power 3 next to underoot is same as undercube??
kheerii
kheerii
Closed by @rugged geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
that would be $(\sqrt{216})^3$, which is different
cyclonmaster36
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somebody help me understand the difference between disks, balls, circles and spheres please?
if i understood correctly a disk in R^2 is the set of points that are at a fixed distance from a given point (radius)
a ball is like a disk but in R^3
but if that's the case what are circles and spheres?
(for context, i'm studying topology in analysis)
As my analysis prof put it, the ball is an idea
ok thank you!
the disk is just a special case of the closed unit ball centred on the origin
The disk is the exact same in R^3 as in R^2
Except you restrict it to a plane
and the circle is just the boundary of the disk
for other dimensions, use balls/spheres
It's like you are take a 2 dimensional slice of your 3d space
Then apply the old definition
This also seems to describe a circle, not a disk
To make it a disk you would do within a certain distance
Not at a certain distance
The concept of a ball remains important in pretty much all metric spaces
what is the circumference then 💀
circumference is the length of the circle (or more generally, boundary of a disk)
you shouldn't really need to care about it in topology
since it isn't a topological invariant
so the problem is that i've always talked about circles when i should've talked about disks. i thought the circumference was the boundary of a circle
circles are the bit on the outside; they're not contractible, and the circumference is its length
disk is the circle plus the insides (these are contractible, and simply connected)
Circumference is a number (scalar)
if it's a closed disk
disks are always closed by definition (as in, if the term "disk" is used unqualified, you should assume that it is closed, so the term "closed disk" is unnecessary)
if it's an open disk the circle isn't in the disk
yes, if you specify open then you exclude the boundary
nice i've never seen it that way
Have you talked about metrics
not yet
You should have the definition of a ball in terms of your metric
Wait for that then
balls and disks are the same thing
except you should probably qualify if the ball is open or closed
so i can use them interchangeably?
open ball = open disk, closed ball = closed disk
hi
disks are generally centred on the origin, if taking them as a euclidean subspace
can I DM you?
balls can be centred elsewhere
if you have a question, please open a thread #❓how-to-get-help
But I did
and every answer I was given didn't satisfy my only question
Interesting, in what sense is a disk a eucledian subspace?
as in the set B(1,0)
so a =b = 0
inheriting the subspace topology from R^n
i mean whether a disc should be open or closed is not something thats set in stone
and depends on your conventions
It seems like we might be using different ball notations. Is that a ball of radius 1 centered at 0?
and also whether its centred on the origin or not
yes
i feel like you shouldnt be preaching these things just because they happen to be your conventions
am i overcomplicating things
Oh I was getting confused for no reason sorry. For some reason I was thinking of vector subspaces instead of metric space subspaces lol
Someone earlier was asking about vector spaces
if you define a disc to be the same as an open ball good for you
if you define a disc to only be the object in R^2, good for you too
Closed by @gaunt temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand something, why is it 3pi/4 divided by 2pi and not 2pi divided by 3pi/4
Because the whole disk corresponds to 2pi radians
You want to see what fraction of the circle 3pi/4 radians is
That would give you something bigger than 1
That is like saying a slice of a disk is multiple disks big
Closed by @radiant portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello , i need help for an exercice , i don't know how to start
I have to demonstrate this
<@&286206848099549185> please can anyone help me for this exercice
Sure
thanks
@glossy berry Has your question been resolved?
please <@&286206848099549185>
@glossy berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to shorten this to the shortest?
(1-(((-0.25)-3*(0.375/7))+(0.375/7)))+((-0.25)-3*(0.375/7))*x+(0.375/7)*x*x
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
I made it.
@alpine viper Has your question been resolved?
@alpine viper Has your question been resolved?
@alpine viper Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @alpine viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @tardy hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I reach the last line from the first line?
Ayanokoji asking a ques is weird
@fair forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Thanks
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Teach me how to facorise x³-6x²+11x-6
By a polynomial methord
use factor by grouping
for the first 2 terms, take the GCF of them and so on and so forth for the 2nd pair of terms
Pls tell me of level of class 8
oh wait
Rational root theorem. The roots, if rational are one of ±1, ±2, ±3, or ±6
i just realized you can’t do factor by grouping
Just test all possibilities by synthetic/polynomial division
yes rational root theorem
Also we know by Vieta's theorem that the roots sum to -6
So there's only one possible sum of all real and rational roots.
The problem of factoring a polynomial is the problem of turning something like ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d into a(x - r1)(x - r2)(x - r3)
Ok
Nope pls tell me
Multiply out a(x - r1)(x - r2)(x - r3)
the rational root theorem: you take the coefficients of the first and last term and find the factors of each one
You should get ax^3 - a(r1+r2+r3)x^2 + a(r1r2 + r1r3 + r2r3)x - ar1r2r3
Now we can identify a = a, b = -a(r1+r2+r3), c = a(r1r2 + r1r3 + r2r3), and d = -ar1r2r3
Ok
So because we have d = -ar1r2r3, we know that, if d is rational, then if r1 is also rational, we can say that r1 is a factor of d.
Ok
Up to sign
Now how we will use it to factorise
So because d is 6, we have r1, if it is rational, must be one of the factors of 6, up to sign, which are {1, 2, 3, 6}
Just use polynomial long division and see if it divides evenly
Ok
Aka synthetic division
You tried to explain me well sir but I was not able understand it quite leave it I am sorry
.close
Closed by @rugged geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@rugged geyser do you not understand synthetic division?
Because I can explain that
I know long division but not that
.reopen
✅
It's just long division
But instead of powers of 10, we use powers of x.
So instead of something like 52|733 we do 5x + 2|7x^2 + 3x + 3
Mechanically it works exactly the same
Yes
If anything it's easier because you do not need to worry about carry
Ok I understood that
I use both terms because I don't know which one a student is familiar with
Rational root theorem only tells you what the rational roots might be.
It doesn't tell you what they are.
You have to check each one
Oh ok
I understand
Now I have to find it and directly divide that to factorise it??
Yup
If you get a remainder of 0 then it's a factor
Otherwise you have to try some other value
Ok let me check
If 1 came remainder
I checked from x-1
And 1 came reminder
???
x-1 | x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6
-5x^2 + 11x - 6
6x - 6
0
I get 0
Well, now we know that (x-1) is a factor
The result of your synthetic division is a quadratic equation
Ok
And you already know how to handle those
The result will be x²-5x+5
Yes
Yes
I didn't corrected the previous mistake
Ok we find that then how will we get three of them
The 2 hardest problems in mathematics are communication, naming things, and off by one errors.
???
A joke
Well, we know that x^3 - 6x + 11x - 6 = (x-1)(x^2 - 5x + 6)
So our other two roots of the cubic are in the quadratic
Yes
How do you solve a quadratic?
By factoring it or using the quadratic equation, right?
How we will get third one??
Yw
.close
Closed by @rugged geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that $\frac{\phi(m)}{m} = \frac{\phi(n)}{n} \text{ if and only if } m \text{ and } n \text{ have exactly the same prime divisors (possibly different powers)}$
I assume phi is euler’s totient function?
$\phi$ is the Euler's totient function
Halex
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
What have you tried
Halex
if $\frac{\phi(m)}{m} = \frac{\phi(n)}{n}$ then we get this
Halex
Indeed
How can we end up saying that each p_i and q_i are the same?
Now you need to justify that r=t and p_i=q_i
Hmm
Take common denominators of both
Oh yeah, this
And compare the numerators and denominators
Also here state somewhere that p1<p2<…<p_r
And same for q
So that you don’t have to deal with rearrangements of the primes at the end
Okay
You mean I should operate and expand terms?
Like 1 - 1/p_i = (p_i-1)/p_i
With this
Yeah, but you did that wrong
Fixed, but still don't see why r should be equal to t
Since both sides of the equation has fractions which must necessarily be in lowest terms (justify why?), you can directly compare the denominators of both fractions
From there the fundamental theorem of arithmetic does the trick
You mean, we can cancel the terms of the numerators and directly compare the denominators?
No, we don’t cancel anything
$\frac{a}{b}=\frac{c}{d}\implies a=c, b=d$ provided we know that all of a, b, c and d are positive integers and, importantly, that both fractions are in their lowest terms
kheerii
That is to say, GCD(a, b)=GCD(c, d)=1
$\left(\frac{p_1-1}{p_1}\right)\left(\frac{p_2-1}{p_2}\right) \ldots \left(\frac{p_r-1}{p_r}\right) = \left(\frac{q_1-1}{q_1}\right)\left(\frac{q_2-1}{p_2}\right) \ldots \left(\frac{q_s-1}{q_s}\right)$
Halex
I know that gcd(p_i, p_i - 1) = 1 but not sure about the whole product
$\left(\frac{\left(p_1-1\right)\left(p_2-1\right):\ldots :\left(p_r-1\right):}{p_1p_2\ldots p_r}\right):=:\left(\frac{\left(q_1-1\right)\left(q_2-1\right):\ldots ::\left(q_s-1\right):}{q_1q_2\ldots :q_s}\right)$
Halex
@manic jackal Has your question been resolved?
Hmm
Each of the terms (p_i - 1) must have a factor of 2
Unless p_1 = 2
from what I can see, it in fact holds
I think it does yeah
@manic jackal Has your question been resolved?
do you know how can I justify it?
been having trouble to do so
@manic jackal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
so i think
what im supposed to do here
is like make a row/column 0 and then determinant is 0?
or something
.close
Closed by @dim kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im trying to figure out the beginning capital but it doesnt show the beginning capital in the trial balance
<@&286206848099549185>
Perhaps explain some of the terms: CR, DR ext.
Your course may have course specific abbreviations that others in this field aren't familiar with
Is their a way to find Capital for the beginning of a month when it isnt given? im in acct 231
<@&286206848099549185>
@jade stirrup Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For questions 3, 4 and 5, can someone reword them / explain to me how i would go about solving them?
like what does f(1) or f(x) = 1 even mean??
f(1),
on the graph, what is the y-coord when x=1
for: f(x)=1
on the graph, what are the x-coords when y=1
e) what are the set of values for x where y>1
ok, when you explain it that way it makes sense
is there a way to rememebr it?
functions always confuse me
f(1) = 0
f(x) = -1 , 1/2, 2
f(x) > 1 = -1, 1/2, 2, 4
? @split chasm
yes for the 2nd one
why is the last one wrong?
ohh
is it because its > 1
not greater than / equal to 1
so itd just be 4
sure
lemme do it on my paint
the solid line means values that are y = 1
but it cant be those values
so its everything ABOVE the pink line
so itd just be (4,2)
x = 4?
ah i see what ur saying
the lines
so would it be
(-1,1/2) U (2,4]
to account for the parts above the pink line?
yes
i see, ok thank you
i have one more problem i completed myself already but i think i missed a step when doiing calculations
would u be able to just see what i did wrong? its a domain problem
i already did the work but the final answer i got was wrong so im not sure
.close
Closed by @desert tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain to me what I’m missing? In previous problems I was told to just ignore the numerator when finding the domain because it wasn’t irrational (such as the numerator being 5x for example) but now that the numerator is square root am I supposed to find the domain of the numerator as well?
I calculated the domain of the denominator and got all real numbers so I’m confused
The domain is all the possible inputs for the function that don't cause problems
So if there are parts of the function that could cause a problem, you need to identify those values and exclude them from the domain
Your function will have problems if the denominator equals zero (because of what x is) and if the inside of the square root is less than 0 (because of what x is)
To find those values, just solve this equation and this inequality:
x^2 - 9x + 8 = 0
2x-5 < 0
The x values that make these statements true must not be in the domain.
ahh so i need to also calculate the domain of the numerator because it is square root?
It's not the domain
It's just the solution of the inequality
The domain is all the values you are allowed to plug into the function
And it's not the numerator, it's the argument of the square root
That cannot be negative
So we solve to find out what x values make it negative, and exclude them from the domain
sorry can you try to use simple terms
im in precalculus and im having trouble understanding a lot
like examples may be easier to explain.. if thats ok
i understand the denominator can not equal 0
or negative
so we put the bottom >= 0
but the numerator has to be > 0 correct, because we cant square root 0?
"Argument" is what you plug into operators like sqrt(), sin(), cos(), etc
Arguments are not always single values, they can be expressions
The argument inside the square root is an algebraic expression
2x-5
The argument is not allowed to be negative if we want the result to be a Real number
That is why we are checking where 2x-5 < 0
The denominator is allowed to be negative
That won't cause any problem
I don't think (by inspection) that it can be negative though nevermind, it can (when x=3, for example)
Less than
You need to exclude those values from the domain
You can, I suppose, see what x values make that positive, and then remove the zeros of the quadratic from that set
But that's more info to hold onto
ok..
Imo
2x-5 < 0
--> x < 5/2
So x must not be less than 5/2
What happened to your attachment?
Oh, nvrmnd
ok so i kind of understand what ur saying
but im just trying to do it the way my teacher taught me
im sry i dont mena to be rude
so ill show u my work
But we already need x to be greater than 2.5, so...
correct
so far i have this
for the numator
the interval is
[5/2 , inf)
and for the denominator
x cannot equal 1 or 8
so would the interval be
[5/2, 8) U (8, inf)?
Yes!
sry for making u explain all that
i was trying to follow along but tbh it was hard
i learn more from examples tbh
so i just tried solving it
The meaning of domain is very easy
isnt it just values that make the denominator 0?
Rigorous definitions make it sound complicated, or like you will mess it up if you do t follow approved procedures
lol thats how i know it
Domain is just all the x values you are allowed to plug into the function because they get you a Real number back
and if your denominator is 0, its not a real number right
Right, because then the implication is that the output is + or - infinity, which is not reachable
okay thank you
Np
@desert tapir Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @desert tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, maybe this is a weird question, but trying to understand..
if a function is said to be derivable twice at a interval, what can I take from it?
like i really dont understand what I can take from this info
well it's useful for many things
for example you know that critical points of a function f are given by f'(x) = 0
but you don't know if they correspond to local maxima, minima, etc...
f''(x) yields some answers to that
if f"(x) > 0, then it's a local minima
if f"(x) < 0, it's a local maxima
otherwise we can't conclude
ah okay that is interesting
another use of 2nd order
is approximating your function around some point
you've seen that with derivable once
f(x) around a point a is approximately f(a) + f'(a) (x-a)
this is the equation of the tangent of f at point a
it's the best line that approximates f(x) around that point
if you have twice differentiable function
you can not only find the best line to approximate f(x) around some point x0
but you can find the best quadratic to approximate f(x)
like ax^2 + bx + c
which values of a,b,c should we pick? well we get them using this:
$f(x) \approx f(x_0) + f'(x_0)(x-x_0) + \frac{f''(x_0)}{2}(x-x_0)^2$
rafilou2003
this is the best 2nd order polynomial for approximating f(x) around x_0
example :
cos is twice differentiable over the real numbers
let's look at x_0 = 0
we have cos'(0) = -sin(0) = 0
and cos"(0) = -cos(0) = -1
with this formula, we get that $\cos(x) \approx 1 - \frac{x^2}{2}$
rafilou2003
okay that is some great info, i need to sit on it a bit so it will absorbs haha
thank you very very much
@rocky karma Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i dont understand what i did wrong?
the difference is in the 3*B^-1
i took out the 3 so it became 3^4
oh i just realized
its (3B)^-1
.close
Closed by @dim kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that for a positive integer $n$ and any integer $a$ gcd(a,a+n) divides n
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so I'm unable to understand the question due to my poor english
I feel this means prove $n|(a+n)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
is that right?
Prove the following statement:
\medskip
If $n \in \Z_{>0}$ and $a \in \Z$ then $\gcd(a, a + n) \mid n$.
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so $1=\frac{n}{d}x+\frac{a+n}{d}y$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
if you've seen bezouts, surely you've seen the euclidean algorithm
oof
they didn't tell you anything about calculating gcds?
if d = gcd(a, a+n), then what do you know about d?
$d|a and d|(a+n)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
yeah, and what is the definition of |?
okay hopefully you'll be able to see this next step then
okay and then how can you get n from that
yes!
that's it?
ye
why don't I ever see the obvious things 😭 . Thanks a lot both of you!
you can write this something like uh
,, d \mid a, ; d \mid a + n \Implies d \mid (a + n) - a
d|((a+n)-a)?
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
but i used subtraction 
what is subtraction but addition if you could time travel
i cannot time travel

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you help me solve this parabola problem
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@small wagon Has your question been resolved?
i just ended up going to do my other questions lol
i dont know what to do since i know that the directrix to vertex and vertex to focus is the same distance
and that entire distance is use to get to the first point by the focus
but i dont know how to do that with just a point
i know that the directrix to vertex and vertex to focus is the same distance
this is true of all points on the parabola, not just the vertex, is it not?
i think so like the point that are from the same line the focus is on is the same distance as the directrix to the focus
but the other points depends
but idk how to solve it
i think you ought to go back and look at the properties of the focus and directrix again
ya i looked at the notes and stuff the directrix to focus is the same distance as the focus to the first 2 points on the parabola
they are both double the p value
"first two points"?
like if the vertex is (-3,4) and the directris is x=-6 and focus is (0,4)
than to plot
you can use the distance bewteen the directris to focus which is 6
and two point for the parabola you can plot is (0,10) and (0,-2)
like its just makes it easier to graph instead of finding a random decimal point location on the parabola
this was a rhetorical question. Every point on the parabola has the same distance from the focus as it has from the directrix
wait how does every point have the same distance?
what about the point that are farther away how would those be the same as points closer to the focus its not like its a circle right
so if it is all the same how would i solve this?
it's not that they all have the same distance
it's that the distance from the focus and the distance from the directrix are the same
ya ik that the vertex is the same distance from the directrix as well and the focuw
please stop limiting yourself to the vertex
every point behaves this way
@small wagon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @small wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand the question
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
let's rewrite as:
hold up
how?
are you familiar with the adjugate?
yes
yea i am
the transpose of the cofactor matrix
yea
that relation should be familiar to you if you know how to take the inverse of a matrix
shouldnt it be C^T/det(a)?
is that not the same?
oh wait i thought u have it on the denominator lol
yea
where C^T is the transpose of the cofactor (known as adjugate or adjoint)
yea
yea
where In is the nxn identity matrix
yea
det(A) I_n = A C^T
pun pun
taking transpose both the side should get us the answer right?
i got this result from this
you don't need the T anymore once you take the determinant
you have the answer already
det(C) = det(C^T)
but in my notes, there's this property that says det(A^T)=(det(A))^T
this might be wrong cus transpose of a scalar makes no sense
yes. but det(A) is just a number
i mean it's technically true, numbers are just 1x1 matrices
oh yea
oh yea we have det(A) here, i thought it was a matrix or something
ok ok thanks i get it now
thanks for the help, i was just having some trouble understanding the question
imma close now
thanks
.close
Closed by @fiery yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
∫(6x^2-4x+7)/sqrt(2x-1)dx
evaluate this
@tired marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tired marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
ok so (2x-1)(3x-1/2) = 6x2-4x+1/2
and this can help evaaluating the integral
but is there another way? This factorising method gives you a long a messy process.
you can save some time by doing u = 2x - 1
you can always do u = mx + b with no consequences, so u = 2x - 1 is a safe option to simplify the sqrt(2x - 1) in the denominator to sqrt(u)
what about the part above
Closed by @tired marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
prove $6|a(a^2+11)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
where $a\in \mathbb{Z}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so to start I have to prove it's always even
whenever you have a divides problem with a small integer, what should you do?
oh that works too
Try to simpliify it to prime number|a
sounds good
is that actually doable though?
yeah
if you want to go snow mode, you can show 6|a((a^2-1)+12)
i would just go by cases for such a small integer
case 1 would be when a is odd
so this is the same as $6|a(a^2+5+6)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so I have to prove 6|a(a^2+5)
try taking out another 6
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
leave it factored
$6|a(a^2-1)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
you could factor it more
$6|a(a-1)(a+1)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
atleast one of which is guranteed to be a multiple of 3
Yes
snow mode
Snow mode fr
thanks snow
When in doubt use the snow mode
another similar problem,$24|a(a^2-1)$ where a is an odd integer
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
then 1 as 25-24
Btw 8|n²-1 when n is odd
hmm, yeah
why not leave it factored
or factor it
when youre doing division, factoring is everything
this is the same as $24|((a+24)-24)(a^2-1)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
this iis the same as this
Not really required
I mean using this proving 3|a is enough
were a=2n+1
which is false for n=2
It doesn't work like that
since 3 is coprime with 8, you 3 can be a factor of either without worrying about overlap
but have you factored it
and then plugged in a = 2n+1
no
no?
Not really it doesn't mean that 3|n²-1 is not a case also
since this expression is divisible by both 3 and 8 this it will be divisible by 24
ah, right
which is why I wrote it like this
Sure it works but you are overcomplicating it
so I now just have to show $24|a(a^2-1)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
for a=2k+1
how else would I do it?
$24|(2k+1)(4k^2+1+4k-1)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
oh my god youre not listening to me
i would do it like this since 8|n(n^2-1) and 3|n(n^2-1) when n is odd
this implies that 24|n(n^2-1)
what am I supposed to do?
I may have missed what you suggested
sorry
oen minute
its fine, conv got you
yay
lol yeah
should have thought of that smh
but i knew before that 8|n^2-1 was true
👍
or else i would have been stuck like you
any other doubts @marsh forum i may be able to help
maybe, i'll ping you if I have any?
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
given an odd integer show $12|(a^2+(a+2)^2+(a+4)^2+1)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so to start i expanded $a^2+(a+2)^2+)a+4)^1+1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
4 should divide it
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
how did you get a^2+3?
a² + 4a + 7 = a² + 7 = a² + 3 (mod 4)
I don't know modular arithmatic
4 | a² + 4a + 7
iff 4 | a² + 7
iff 4 | a² + 3
Remember that a is an odd number.
now you can rewrite a as the odd form
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
alternately you can change it to a^2-1 and FACTOR
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in order to solve this do i haave to change the minimum bound on the z bounds to include a y instead of just x ?
I mean, $\int_0^1\int_0^x\int_x^{2x}7yz\cos(16x^5)\dd{z}\dd{y}\dd{x}$ should be easy enough to solve
kheerii
i solved it twice that way and im unsure whether or not i did it right
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
the only thing i can think of is the bound because i think the z bounds need both x and y to be included?

