#help-38
1 messages · Page 126 of 1
hey are we doing with the actual explanation or this one
you gotta choose one, remember
Tbh if what youre abt to continue explaining will make me better at math then heck yeah but ill waste your time and annoy you with my questions and stupidity. So its really your choice
then its faster if we start with the initial explanation
Go ahead. I’ll let u write everything out then ill ask (if i have questions)
you know r(x) = x^2
it squares numbers
now say the domain is [0, √3]
you can figure out that the range is [0, 3]
that is what f([0, √3]) = [0, 3] means, I thought you would know that
any questions so far
Oh it means range
Ok no questions
oh awit
oh no theres a typo in there
you know r(x) = x^2
it squares numbers
now say the domain of r is [0, √3]
you can figure out that the range of r is [0, 3]
that is what r([0, √3]) = [0, 3] means
Oh
(So name of the)(domain of the function} = (range of the function) is what that formula means
Ok.
thats not a formula
Wrong phrasing
you keep calling it a formula, I dont think you know what that word means
also you are misreading what the pattern is
English isnt my native
the pattern is f(this) = that
and I am using the pattern on intervals instead of numbers
you gotta tell me how you didnt see that earlier
R(the donain) = (the range) yes that makes sense
I have no idea how you missed that, you could be missing a lot more if I keep leaving holes in the explanation like that
no extra parenthese on the range
r(domain) = range
Im dumbbbbb
Okay? 😭
thats not a very helpful description for you is it
surely you should get to the bottom of that
its easier than you think but I cant do it for you
What are you even talking about? My dumbness?
let me repeat
I have no idea how you missed that, you could be missing a lot more if I keep leaving holes in the explanation like that
just saying "Im dumb" is not a very helpful description for you, is it
surely you should get to the bottom of this and be more specific
its easier than you think but I cant do it for you
you know r(x) = x^2
it squares numbers
now say the domain of r is [0, √3]
you can figure out that the range of r is [0, 3]
that is what " r( [0, √3] ) = [0, 3] " means
you know F(x) = x + 1
it adds 1 to numbers
now say the domain of F is [0, 3]
you can figure out that the range of F is [1, 4]
that is what " F( [0, 3] ) = [1, 4] " means
Yes okay
now you can see that r( [0, √3] ) = [0, 3]
and F( [0, 3] ) = [1, 4]
so F( r( [0, √3] ) ) = F( [0, 3] ) = [1, 4]
and there you can see that the pattern has emerged again
the domain of F(r(x)) is [0, √3]
the range of F(r(x)) is [1, 4]
and its directly from considering how the domain would pass through the functions in order
it cant get more direct than that
the rules/formulas youre learning are procedures to help work with that
so theyre not as direct but they answer the question you had on finding the domain of F(r(x))
Can i ask now?
I understand this
But this? How?
consider the following
you said earlier that f(domain) = range
this is a general pattern just like with say F(r(0)) = 1
that pattern is how you write the input and output of a function
to be sure, do you get that F(r(0)) = 1
I mean- when you plug in x=r(x) in f(x) it’ll give you the equation for f(r(x)) which you can plug in x = 0 and you’ll get 1 ig
F(r(x)) is x^2 +1
Yes.
Isnt that pattern = equation of the function
X^2 +1 for this case
back, thats roughly the idea
youre forgetting though that F and r each have specific domains
so F(r(x)) isnt just x^2 + 1
I wont ask you to explain, say what f(r(x)) other than x^2+1 and perhaps ill understand since i think the problem here is the phrasing
F(r(x)) is x^2+1 considering that x is a part of f(r(x))’s domain
Of thats what you mean
If*
I mean wait
Isnt the domain of f(x) is what values x can be
So the domain of f(r(x)) is what values r(x) can be which is the domain of r(x) whicg is indeed [0,sqrt3]
Ok
I understand
@proper kernel so sorry for the ping but its 7am and if my parents wake up theyll kill me
sorry I gtg
which is the range
So yes the domain of f(r(x)) is [0,sqrt3]
Yea sorry
Values for r(x) is range
Yes
Okay… we’re done yeah
So you made me understand how the entire thing works
Tysm
Wish you luck in whatever you’ll do
you too
.close
Closed by @torn shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there an easy way to find x?
Closed by @prime shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
there's no other way then a calculator for this btw
no exact solution
yeah thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
author must be wrong, you can't have four linearly independent vectors in R^3
I'm Indian too
Nice I am also Indian , hindustani
.close
Closed by @rapid horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Can I use Hindi here or not?
Ok
You didnt
she did close it, it just won't disappear if everyone keeps talking in here
... Cairo is typing...
Bhai india mai kaha se ho?
Rajasthan 👿
I am not Indian
It seems to anant
Oh ok
yes
where else speaks hindi?
Ok
Kota
In india
I'm tamil
i know but she said she wasn't indian
Oh
i didn't know if there were other countries
Ya
Nepal?
as far as i know pakistan is mainly urdu and sri lanka is sinhala
India mai kaha se ho?
gujarat 🙋
Jai shri ram
Jai shri ram
Gujarat is in india
@native radish Your good at maths?
My dad is a maths teacher ( msc first class) I little good at maths as his son
If your I need helpers because I'm preparing for imo and ap level for Cambridge University
You wanna be my friend
I am preparing for ssc cgl
?
Shrimad ramayana youtube pe aani lag gyi finally!! 
it means friend
I mean friend in Hindi
Ramanujan was a Tamil so I like Tamil Nadu and it's a good state for scientific research
Yes
Bodhi dharman who was the founder of kunfu is also from tamil
sn Bose was born on Kolkata I think
Yes a Bengali who worked with Einstein and founder of god particle it's a honour to us cus we are also bose
We are in same group
🫡
You mean Subash Chandra Bose?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
No I mean satyendra nath Bose
A well known mathematician
.close
Closed by @frail heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
If you want to talk about non-math things, try to keep it to social channels like #discussion
Ok sorry
Ok can you close it
I did close it
I am sorry for discussing non maths things
You can close it
@native radish You have to close it now
Fairyrose >
Wait a min
What you are saying to close
About
I can't
I have not the control
Then why saying
Lmao
Mean see rose what he is saying
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can a regular language set have infinite elements in it?
@stable wing Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stable wing
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand how they got the bound for y2 to be 0 < y2 < 2
@gentle sleet Has your question been resolved?
@gentle sleet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gentle sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I guess here a is -2?
how can it be negative it's on positive y axis
what does the area under probability density function represent ?
@rapid horizon Has your question been resolved?
,calc 1-1/230.125
Result:
0.8125
What is that cairo?
Result:
1.375
Of course 1
?
Hey here i subtracted the area of triangle
1/2×b×h , b= 3 h = 0.125
Next i equated the area of trapezium to remaining part
Area of trapezium = 1/2(sum of parallel sides) × base
Ok
Yes i know you find the area but i am cofused what area you find and what you subtracted
Should we not ignore negative area?
I think we cant
Yeah
Fine thanks
Does it gives correct ans?
Welcome !
Yes correct
Ok
I was confused by the calculation 🤣🙈
I used * they wrote in some weird way
.close
Closed by @rapid horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help in part a
says that 180 per foot across
so i always need to get 800 ft across so 800x 180
plus the rest 100x
but i think im interpreting this wrong
@gleaming ermine Has your question been resolved?
@gleaming ermine Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
Uve been here for so long 😭
So first convert the 2mi to ft to make everything easier
Shi mb I would of helped but it’s in miles and feet 
You need to find the amount of ft for across the river (the diagonal blue line) then multiply by 180
Just use the pythag theorem.
Then for the distance across the land (the straight blue line) it will be whatever 2mi is in ft - x, multiply that by 100!
Right ☠️
When I first saw it I was like “what the heck is mi”
I can’t think in miles and feet lmfao
shouldnt it just be x
You’re tryna find that blue line
The blue line will be 2 mi - x
The cable is the blue lines
HAHA
Should be light now
!close
.close
Closed by @gleaming ermine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me understand why this integral becomes ucos(u)du
Closed by @quartz arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I determine if A spans all of R4?
I know this is the same as the system of equations encoded by A having infintely many solutions
but how can I determine such a thing?
@hexed shard Has your question been resolved?
@hexed shard Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if i'm trying to find the area between these two curves, how should i split them up? or are they both correct?
The second picture is easier, but it doesn't really matter what you do
when integrating, if going along the x-axis, keep each as functions of x (solve for y), if y, turn into functions of y (solve for x)
@loud trellis Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @loud trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @olive rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it possible to change the graph for a cosine function from blue to green?
My current function is
use area
the blue plot doesn't look like it matches this function
Oh... I actually pulled up the wrong pic. The blue graph is f(x) plotted with values 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, ...
My bad
I don't know if my question makes any sense now.. I want the plot to look like the green graph.
square it?
@slim wedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slim wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This one is giving me algebra difficulty
Here is how I have been solving these problems thus far:
- I take the derivatives partial to x and y.
In this case, fx = 3x^2 - 3 + 3y^2, and fy = 6xy - I set these equations to 0 to find the coordinates of the critical points.
Here is where I am having trouble.x = sqrt(3)*sqrt(1-y^2), -sqrt(3)*sqrt(1-y^2)
and 0 = 6xy
So I do not know how to proceed further. Plugging x into 0 = 6xy has proven a bit beyond me.
then later on... past the point where I am stuck:
3) take fxx, fyy, and fxy. solve for the hessian determinant and do the 2nd partial test. then plug these coordinates into the function to get the local min/max and/or saddle point
I guess we can tell that x = 0 and y = 0 from 0 = 6xy and plug that into the fx = 0
.close
Closed by @hidden sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im just trying to understand how wolfram alpha get's this result since that's not the result I got.
what result do you get?
the normal log(|x-1|) - log(|x|)
- C
but I was trying to solve a bigger problem and using that solution for that integral actually yields an answer i would expect in that bigger problem so I was trying to understand what i got wrong and came to this weird thing
logarithm only accepts positive values, so these are essentially the same
I know but then why the -(x-1) i dont understand
thats the part of |x-1| that's in 0,1
Depends on your domain
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
sure
let me send it
this is the original problem as you can see its a separable differential equation that shouldn't be too hard to solve and at some point in the solution you have to solve that integral
idk if this really helps because its just more complicated but sure
yeah
so what does that mean
do you see that part where it says "assuming a complex-valued logarithm"
wolfram's answer is correct since it doesn't care if the log has a negative input
hm
though normally on paper you write it with the absolute value signs
but i still dont understand why multiply by -1
if it didnt care then it would have just not used the absolute value
for complex logs, yes, but you want to stay in the real domain
it's the same thing
you can think of it as ln(-x) = ln(x) + ln(-1) and ln(-1) is just a constant (even though it's imaginary), meaning it's added into the +C when integrating
i still dont completely get it how would that "stay in the real domain" maybe a visual explanation could help
yes but that would yield a different solution overall and not a good one for the differential equation
my question isn't really why would wolfram alpha do that its more like why is that necessary for the solution to the differential
then add in the absolute value signs
if you assume a complex-valued logarithm (as wolfram has showed you) you don't need to
but that's normally how it's done
this is a graph of 1/(1-e^(|x|)) vs 1/(e^(|x|)+1)
when i made the differential i had the green solution in mind
that's if you do that little step in the logarithm
blue one is if you just plain ignore the absolute value
i have no idea what this is
solutions to ^
mb read the functions again i misstyped a sign
for a differential equation involving sgn you can solve it piecewise i guess
i.e. if x > 0, solution is [this]; if x < 0, solution is [this]
I did that and i wanted to try just using |x| since if you integrate sgn(x) you get |x|
i mean yesterday i was trying to solve the same thing but without the (1-y) term
and its just ce^(-r|x|)
hm
maybe thats it
it just assumed x was in between 0 and 1
idk why but ig thats what it did
so then what is the actual solution to this
ill try doing this and looking at the graph
shit you need to do the exact same integral
@lusty delta if i wanted to be rigorous how would i go about solving ln|y-1| - ln|y| = -rx+C
@warm nymph Has your question been resolved?
hm
this is beyond me i might just accept that wolfram alpha is so good it transcends any understanding
@warm nymph Has your question been resolved?
there is a big hint in the "assuming a complex-valued logarithm" note
you use partial fractions to get
$=\int (\frac{1}{x-1}-\frac{1}{x})dx$
Bob Goldham
Bob Goldham
Bob Goldham
if you want the step-by-step for the left integral we do integration by substitution, define u:=x-1 and du=a integrate du
which yields ln(u)
undo the substitutions and you end up with the result you got here
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The length
What
What is it referring to, what it means
God
Mickey lord
What is the length
It means I have to straighten the curve in [0,1] and measure the length in the span
I do not have a steam iron at my hand
What should I do
they're referring to arc length
there's a formula
arc length of function y(x) from x = a to x = b is integral from a to b of sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2)
Tell me Neil
Should I memorize it
Or there’s a way of interpretation
yeah it's important enough to memorize, but there's a logical way to understand it too
Neil
it comes from the pythagorean theorem
Neil is such a good name
oh uh thank you lol
Neil nailed it
I see
so the integrand becomes sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2) dx
imagine that dy and dx were actual variables for a moment
then dx = sqrt(dx^2)
Is there a name for this
arc length formula
Ohh
In this section we’ll determine the length of a curve over a given interval.
here is a super simple derivation
they chop the curve up into a bunch of little line segments which have a length that can be found using the change in x and change in y
Thank you Neil, you’re so kind
Closed by @blazing geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this the same as (p and not q) implies r?
@sick gale Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
yes, it is the same. Apparently it varies from litterature to litterature, I commonly see $\lnot$, but ~ is also regarded as 'not'.
Crystopher
Closed by @sick gale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what happened here? At first I thought they were multiplying both sides by -3, but on the bottom the 3 stayed as a 3 and didn't turn into a 9. 
they multiplied just the top by 3
and then took the negative to the denominator
oh like they just picked a side to have the negative?
yeah, it wont matter whether the denominator or the numerator recieves the negative
makes sense, thank you!
all g
where did this 2 come from?
@red scarab Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @red scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! I'm recreating this question because the channel with it is hidden (can't reopen). I need help proving a fact. Conditions: There are containers of 20 or 40 tonnes, 60% of all containers are filled with sugar. Can the mass of the containers with sugar be 40% of the total mass?
Containers can weigh 20 tonnes or 40 tonnes so there are two options for containers with sugar - there are containers with 20 tonnes of sugar and/or with 40 tonnes of sugar. The same with containers with not-sugar. So we can take 2 sugar containers with 40 tonnes and 1 sugar container with 20 tonnes but the amount of sugar containers (in this case the amount of sugar containers is 3) must be 60% of total amount of containers (so in this case there must be 5 containers in total and 2 of them are not-sugar containers and the amount ratio of not-sugar containers is 40%).
For example, question: can the mass ratio be 50%?
Yes, if we take 4 not-sugar container with 40 tonnes, 2 sugar containers with 40 tonnes and 4 sugar containers with 20 tonnes. So it will be 160/320 which is sugar container mass ratio and 6/(4+6)=6/10 which is sugar container amount ratio (one of possible combinations, but this one shows how we can choose containers to get the right mass ratio (in this question right mass ratio is 50%)).
I know about a way of proving it by finding minimum of mass ratio, which is 3/7 (which is greater than 40%). However, I need to explain why the proof I compiled is correct (not the one with the minimum).
I knew that the answer is 'No' but couldn't normally prove my position when I was solving it for the first time. I have written (on the screenshot):
So I am asking for help in showing a proof by which I can get exactly the same ratio ( 4[20x+40y] = 6[20x+40y] ) by which I have shown that 40% is impossible. In the proof, I had to use only those ideas that were given in the condition or were written by me in the proof (on the screenshot). So mass ratio and amount ratio can be used.
@devout prawn Has your question been resolved?
Not true (it was 3 am I went to sleep) because the integral evaluates to ln|x-1|
Wolfram alpha considers the alternative ln(1-x) because it's positive in ]0,1[
Idk why that would give such a more appropriate solution to the differential
@devout prawn Has your question been resolved?
@devout prawn Has your question been resolved?
lets say we have 4 types of containers:
With sugar & 20 tonnes, this will be a
Without sugar & 20 tonnes, this will be b
With sugar & 40 tonnes, this will be c
Without sugar & 40 tonnes, this will be d
We will write a system of equations to prove there is no solution:
clonesolopros
clonesolopros
clonesolopros
clonesolopros
clonesolopros
clonesolopros
$10b+2d+12c=0 \implies (b<0) \lor (c<0) \lor (d<0)$
clonesolopros
Thank you for the solution, I understand it. I have also solved this system, got a slightly different equation but still be the same proof of impossibility. Is there a way to get a final equation:
4(20x+40y)=6(20x + 40y) or 4(a+c)=6(a+c)
I have transformed this system of equations but I can’t get rid of b and d and several moments with c. Here what I got (can’t be sure, maybe did something wrong)
As I can see, it hasnt got any solutions in natural numbers. It should be an answer but I need to transform it to 4(20x+40y)=6(20x + 40y) or 4(a+c)=6(a+c). Is there a way to do so?
it simplifies to:
\begin{gather*}
2(20x+40y)=0\
2(a+c)=0
\end{gather*}
clonesolopros
clonesolopros
I mean is there a way to get exactly
4(20x+40y)=6(20x + 40y) or 4(a+c)=6(a+c)
It can be not a final result, I just need to get it somewhere in the solution. Doesn’t matter if it will be in the end or in the middle, just somewhere, but exactly one of those two equations.
I might not understand something and one of those equation has already been given, please tell me if so
those equations dont make sense, well you just subtract the terms from both sides
yeah they dont make sense but I need to get them somehow. As I said I know how to solve this task with normal ways but I will have to proof that my method is right so I have to get this equation through some conversions. Could you show how to subtract to get what I need? I haven't got any ideas how to get rid of 0,4d and 0,4b
my idea is this:
$\frac{12a+24c}{4} = \frac{8b+16d}{4}$
clonesolopros
$= 3a+6c=2b+4d$
clonesolopros
and since we have $2a +2c = 3b + 3d$
clonesolopros
$\implies c=\frac{2b+4d-3a}{6}$
clonesolopros
and $2a+2(\frac{2b+4d-3a}{6}) = 3b+3d$
clonesolopros
$=a=3b+3d-\frac{2b+4d}{3}$
clonesolopros
$=\frac{7b+5d}{3}$
clonesolopros
so: $a=\frac{7b+5d}{3}$ and $c=\frac{2b+4d-3a}{6}$
clonesolopros
so b and/or d will remain under any conversions? And there is no way to get that equation that I have written?
- can you explain it? xd, 2.I dont think so
explain the equation that I have written?
no the remaining under any conversion
Can't really explain, I just cant imagine the way of getting 4(a+c)=6(a+c) through these formulas for 'a' and 'c' that you have shown above. I might be wrong tho
well bc we "know" a, we can further simplify c, by putting the formula for a into c
$c=\frac{-5b - d}{6}$
𝚃𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎
clonesolopros
C is negative
so no natural solutions
nope
so we cant get 4(a+c)=6(a+c)
that is like saying 1=0
your formula doesnt have to do anything with this
I think
but if the mass was a bit closer it could have a solution maybe
yep, it was like a random equation that I wrote on exam two weeks ago and I was trying to proof that it will work but I think it was just a random thing that has nothing with real solution
I hope you can do something with this 😂
sorry for wasting your time and thank you for trying to help me! I'll close that
I wont speak about it XD
its always an investment of time XD
I think this problem was a real time-waster. On exam and here :D
Thank you)
.close
Closed by @devout prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
What have you tried
What seems to be the problem?
@sacred basin Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just want to check that I am starting this question correctly? I am on question 6., and I am getting x=x and y=-y, which seems a bit weird, but I guess is possible if y=0?
You didn’t put the name sake of the method, the Lagrange multiplier, into any of your equations
@umbral river Has your question been resolved?
Oh true
But when I do I get that it equals -1 from the y equation, and 1 from the x equation
Meaning -1=1
Which isn't true obviously
That means you have two possible cases for lambda. Try solving for each one.
@umbral river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In a physics experiment, a group of students showed that the position equation of a particle in uniformly accelerated rectilinear motion can be written in the form x(t)=10(3t-5)(2t-1), with x in cm and t in s. The values of the initial velocity v0 and the acceleration a of the particle are
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
4
Can you show the work?
Looks right
Closed by @left fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could I get some help on this question? I am supposed to solve it with lagrange multiples. (I solved using the distance formula already and got 9/sqrt5). It is getting a lot more complex than any of the example questions and I feel like I may have done something wrong, but regardless I don't really know where to go from here.
@umbral river Has your question been resolved?
I think you have gone down a bit of a rabbit hole trying to find the gradient of the distance function here 
Start with $$\mathcal{L} (x,y,\lambda) = f(x,y) + \lambda g(x,y)$$
TayBee
f(x,y) is the objective function - it is much easier to work with the square of the distance rather than the distance itself
Sure, but how do I get g(x,y)?
$f(x,y) = (x-4)^2 + (y-2)^2$
TayBee
Oh, I see. So I can just square it?
Yeah, if you minimise the square of the distance you will get the same result as minimising the distance
Np, so ye plug those in, set the partial derivatives to 0 and solve the system of eqns, you'll arrive at the answer 
Closed by @umbral river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just want a second pair of eyes im super sleep deprived did i plot these right
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Four
everything is right except (6, -2)
you plotted (6,0)
you also plotted (0,-2) for some reason
i mean visually this can't be correct since you have five points listed and six points plotted
ah
ok let me redo
i was thinking visually it didnt look rght
okay @hallow kite
should look a little better 😅
isn't this the exact same as the first one?
yeah that looks right now
.close
Closed by @cinder lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
👍
whats the problem?
yes
Closed by @cinder lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve $$ \int{x cos 4x dx} $$ I keep messing it up
Nerdy_Coder
We could point out where things go wrong in your work. I suppose you're doing integration by parts?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@bright pine Has your question been resolved?
Yea
the work is too poorly structured to see what's going on
stop doing everything on a single line
it's hard to see where equations start and stop
can you try doing it again
(also respond to the bot so the channel doesn't close)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
simplify and then rational root theorem. That's my guess.
You can also just try RRT by calculating only 2x3x8x12
But, assuming RRT does work, it doesn't guarantee you find every solution
,w (x+2)(x+3)(x+8)(x+12)=4x^2

ok, so cancelling the 4x^2 doesn't help
I'm putting money on RRT
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
@rapid horizon okay, try RRT.
And I think this will be good shortcut
@rapid horizon Has your question been resolved?
After simplifying ingot x^4+25x^3+152x^2+552x+576=0@kindred pier
So should I factor 576 now?
That's cool. You didn't need to do the whole thing, but sure
You could have just done 2x3x8x12 to get 576
and you don't even need 576, you just need its factors, which are the factors of 2,3,8 and 12
Looks good
Now you just have the painful task of testing which work
idk who gave you this problem, but they mean
Can we use calculus?
@rapid horizon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rapid horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone show me how I would do this
You wanna use gauss
ok i'm on the right track at least
I already found it's gauss elim
since i found it, now what
Instead of like this, I would write it like an augmented matrix
?
oh with the line?
Yeah
OK haha
yea lol soz
The apply gauss algorithm
If you manage to get a row of zeros, then you have one equation like this:
0=0
And the next one would be:
ay+bz=0
In these cases we say we have a degree of freedom and chose z to be a variable
Which means that we found solutions that are not 0
Using gauss elim
ok i did the gauss elim alreadt
I got this
now we could say we have 2x+2y-6z=0 and -1y+2z=0
i think
now idk what to do
By choosing g z=t, we can find solutions for y
And then we can find solutions for x
So in total, we find solutions for the coefficients where they are not all 0
Here z=t, y=2t, ...
so for -1y+2z, would it become -1y+2t?
Yes
and find for t?
oh
We are not solving for x y z, we are solving for r s t
But the result is the same, it's just names
So we have
2r+2s-6t=0
-1s+2t=0
0 =0
And here we can say t=t
And then s=2t
And then find r
Thus we find the set of solutions
Sry for the confusion there
r=s+3t then righ?
yea it was a bit confusing but I realsied what you were slowly refering to
then you just sub everything in?
r=3t-s
It means we found infinitely many solutions
So how would I find values where r s and t make 1 of the infinite solutions
Generally we found
(r,s,t)=(t,2t,t)
To find on of these solutions, just choose any t
Except for t=0
Any number?
Yes
Like 2
Yes
Woah.
You can also check if with f=2 so r=2 and s=4, the scaled vectors add to 0
Btw, visually, this means that if we have n vectors and they are linearly dependent, they span in a structure that is at most n-1 dimensional
ah
For example here we have 3 dependant vectors which means they don't span a 3 dimensional space
When they are independent, then they do span a n dimensional space
Easiest example are the vectors (1,0,0), (0,1,0) and (0,0,1)
They are clearly independent and also span the 3d space
Closed by @drifting rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Btw @drifting rose for more intuition I highly highly recommend the linear algebra series on youtube by 3blue1brown
oh I heard of that guy, will definately look into him more, his videos seem amazingly good from observation
But ty for the help, it really made me understnd
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so I have a very simple question i just need confirmation: i am aware it is in dutch here is the translation:
'The arc-sin function is the invese function of the sin function with limited domain [-pi/2, pi/2]' now my question is: isnt this definition wrong?
isnt it limited domain [-1,1] ?
what they mean is that arcsin comes from the sine function where you've restricted the domain of the sine function to [-pi/2, pi/2]
they're not referring to [-pi/2, pi/2] as the domain of arcsin
for two functions to be inverses, the domain of one is the range of the other and vice-versa
oh
well then i suppose i just interpreted it weird
i suppose if i rotate it
like this
i get something that resembles the sin(x) with limited domein [-pi/1,pi/2]
okay
thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @livid inlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me to derive an integral expression for this volume
Using (r, theta, z) i get that theta is in [0, pi]
With gives me this on the rz plane
Now I need to convert this to spherical coordinates, and I was thinking about moving the z axis to r = 4 that way it would be much easier but idk how to consider the aditional area
Maybe there's a easier approach idk
@hasty idol Has your question been resolved?
@hasty idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
any other info given?
hmmm i feel like we will make some triangles and use congruence rules
you have two intersecting chords
you can apply intersecting chords theorem
(part of power of a point)
@slate bolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone please let me know if my answers are correct.
- is good, in 2) using sine is wrong since $\sin T = \frac{RS}{RT}$. So even if you computed it correctly you would solve for $RS$, not $ST$. Otherwise the method was alright.
Crystopher
Can someone help me solve this questions? I'm supposed to use linear equations ro solve it and idk where to start 😭😭😭
The total cost after 3 months includes a 10% tax and is $825. Tax increases to 13% at month 6 and the total cost after 6 months with 13% tax is $1356. What is the monthly maintenance fee and building fee
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Oh, sorry 😅
@eternal sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is this not undetermined??????
can u show the whole thing
This doesn't answer my question
Can you post the problem statement instead of the solution ?
as t approaches 0 or -inf respectively u get 1 and 0 as the value of the expression
Yes
But in last one it approaches +inf
And somehow the result is zero
…
@rustic arrow Has your question been resolved?
No 🥲
@rustic arrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rustic arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This would be 1000 possible permutations, not combinations, right?
selecting the digits to use is combinations
arranging the digits in a specific order is permutations
for language purposes like in that message you posted, writing combinations makes more sense
combinations is where order doesn't matter
so 475 would be equal to 745
which is obviously not that case here
permutation is definitely the correct word to use mathematically but that reddit comment used the language loosely ig and used the word "combination" like we use in everyday life
Closed by @still plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find X in number 5
my work is written in pencil, the original figure is in ink
i am stuck, what do i do
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @magic sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi.
$[
\lim_{m \to \infty} \frac{\sum_{n=0}^{m} \left( \int_{0}^{n} -\frac{1}{x^2} , dx \right)}{\ln(\ln(m))}
]$
Mary
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Does the harmonic 1/x series grow faster or slower than ln(ln(m))?
you can do an integral test on 1/x that approximate the growth rate of the sum of 1/x
note that the integral from 1 to n of 1/x is larger than the sum of 1/m from m goes from 2 to n
i don't think the integral converges
No, the integral diverges, i am talking about the limit comparing to ln(ln(m))
i think they mean the integral of 1/x^2
integral of 1/x^2 from 0 to 1 is divergent
-1/x^2 and yes it is divergent
so integral of -1/x^2 from 0 to n will always be undefined
and the limit wouldnt make sense
wait what
you probably meant to integrate from 1 to n
in which case you get someting* 1/x +something
Oh yeah, that was a typo sorry
no worries
but anyways for your question
you can do this
hopefully the method is clear to you
u get get a lower bound and an upper bound for the sum of 1/x
in this case lower bound is useful
Closed by @stone comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the inverse of the function $f(x)=log_a(x+\sqrt{x^2+1})$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
so $a^y= x+\sqrt{x^2+1}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
or $(a^y-x)^2 =x^2+1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
$\implies a^2y+x^2-2a^yx=x^2+1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
Closed by @marsh forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

what prevents you from stealing it
carl bot
you can download this link then reupload it into discord emoji server https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/1129577505771225118.gif?size=96&quality=lossless
thanks!
please don't promote your server in help channels!
to ask for help check out #❓how-to-get-help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello can somebody please explain why lambda = 2 has algebraic multeplicity = 2
(I calculated the determinant using Sarrus)
well this char poly isnt fully factored yet
as a note, it would be imo easier to expand the det along the second row
@gaunt temple Has your question been resolved?
in that case, using laplace the determinant would be (2-lambda)[(3-lambda)^2 - 1)] right?
and if i factor everything i can find the zeros of the polynomial
but how can i find the algebraic multeplicity?
if it's something like (10-lambda)^2 * (6-lambda) it's easy to see that 10 is an eigenvalue of algebraic multeplicity = 2 and 6 is an eigenvalue of algebraic multeplicity = 1
but here it doesnt seem very obvious to me
