#help-38
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
Result:
77
a
so upto 76 pi its 0° angle
how do u know that
im sorry i know i already went through this class i just forgot how to do this completely
You said it here
I think thats what the question is asking for
You have to start working in radians
76 pi = 76 ×180°
= 38 × 360°
So 38 full rotations
And then 77
Yeahh
Welcome !
.close
Closed by @torpid magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Example
what exactly is the issue?
@chilly sphinx
I dont get waht to do
you have two equations
to solve them, one technique is to solve each equation to the same thing
in this case they were solved for y
and since y=y, they got 2x-1=-x+2
and then they solve for x to get x
doing so will find x values, for which y is the same in both equations
Hm
so for example in 2 a), you would divide the second equation by 3, so that both are solved for y
you can alternatively multiply the first equation by 3, so that both are solved for 3y and then set the sides equal
Would be easier to multiply first one no?
yes
Alright so ill write that down rq and then ill tell u what i got
The only hard part for me is getting the y to a same value

können übrigens auch gerne deutsch reden haha
O
Gerne doch
Ist es auch möglich das Gleichsetzungsverfahren mit dem x zu machen?
Nur so eine Frage
ja, das geht auch
Im allgemeinen versucht man damit eine Gleichung zu erhalten, die nur noch von einer Variablen abhängt, sodass man diese lösen kann
Welche Variable das dann ist ist komplett egal
also ist x 4
Und die setze ich dann in eine x variable rein
Um y herauszufinden
Oder?
@woven nova
4 dürfte nicht ganz richtig sein
3y=6x-12
3y=-2x+12
6x-12=-2x+12
8x=24
x=3
aber ja, dann einfach in irgendein x einsetzen
A
welche gleichung ist dann auch egal, weil wir ja gerade Lösungen suchen, wo beide Gleichungen gleichzeitig erfüllt sind
Als ich +2x gerechnet habe habe ich es nicht auf die 6 addiert
👍
Ich rechne mal weiter
Mache jetzt b und c und pinge dich gleich
Oder wenn ich Schwierigkeiten habe
Nur um sicherzugehen bei b sind ja beide x und beide y gleich also kann man sich eins davon aussuchen
Kann ich bei b nicht einfach die 65 auf die andere seite bringen
Und dann +y
Also -65 und dann +y
@woven nova
yep 👍
Kannst du mir c erklären
Da kann man es deutlich mit x machen aber ich weiß nicht wie das funktioniert
A
Habe auf die falsche
Aufgaben
Geschaut
Lol
Aber bei d
Kann man es mit x machen
Wie?
@woven nova
doch
yoah wir haben bei der d ja: x+5y=-7
das gibt uns: x=-5y-7
dann haben wir nach x gelöst
somit können wir dann gleichsetzen
Nur das hat mich verwirrt
Okay
Ist -0,75 richtig?
Oder halt -6/8
Also y
Und x dann 1,25?
@woven nova
Oh
Habe mein Fehler gefunden
Hab das minus vergessen 🐧

Danke für die Hilfe den Rest schaffe ich auch alleine
@woven nova
.close
Closed by @chilly sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
alles klar 👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help solving
Use chain rule
if y = 4^(something) then dy/dx = 4^(something) * ln(4) * d/dx(something)
does that say g(secx)?
@hot mountain Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
.close
Closed by @hot mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In the screenshot, there is provided a definition of an inclusion map, for an injection f:B->A, what does it mean for it to be defined by f(b) =b for all b is an element of B?
Say A={1, 2, 3, 4, 5} and B={1, 2, 3} (a subset of A)
Now the inclusion map would be f : B -> A such that
f(1) = 1
f(2) = 2
f(3) = 3
It's kind of like a generalization of an identity function
image you can sketch some region A, then there is some smaller region B contained in A where every point in B gets mapped to itself
an identity function is a type of inclusion map
But when you have an identity function it's always defined from some set to itself
but with an inclusion map the codomain can actually be bigger than the domain
so strictly speaking the inclusion map I gave above and the identity function g : B -> B such that
g(1) = 1
g(2) = 2
g(3) = 3
are different functions because they have different codomains
but they behave very similarly
the domain must be a subset of the codomain with an inclusion map
no worries ^^
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
did you get this from a book?
i had an additional question, sorry.
It was an original example albeit a very simple one
I had.
oh, where?
i see.
oh I see lol
Closed by @atomic moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does the 3 row equal -3
I understand .1 = -1
as that would 10/100 = 1/2
threfore -1
$0.001 = 10^{-3}$, so $\log_{10}(10^{-3}) = -3\log_{10}(10) = -3$
45
Okay the equation makes sense
but does -3log do anything
or 10^(10)
10^-3
= 1/1000
.001
.close
Closed by @north hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm pretty confused. I thought maybe I can do a line integral with the given vector over C, with C being a circle with radius 4 in the xy plane?
But it wasn't really working
@bronze plover Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@bronze plover Has your question been resolved?
Have you tried thinking through the problem?
I mean, I don't really know how to think about this
@bronze plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@jade haven Has your question been resolved?
I don’t see a mistake
What do you mean well written ?
The train of thought is pretty clear yes
Closed by @jade haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys help me out with it
you leaked yourself btw
how did you get c?
yeah how?
how?
you been coding for 21 hours 💀
can you type what you did
it rolls over once you get to 24 more like 3 weeks 💀
Oooooo
yeah, I think you swapped 2*8 and 3*-4 at some point
Yeah
Yeah
yeah that's it
.close
Closed by @runic sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@lethal fable Has your question been resolved?
sign error in the first line
should have +7y, not -7y
(and don't be lazy with dropping the =0)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct notation (in general)
@gray charm Has your question been resolved?
Looks good
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know pythagoras' theorem
try applying that for part a)
is the hyptenous length 3m??
cause the length is 3m?
how?
what calculations did you make that lead to finding 3m as the length of the hypotenuse
length of the shelter is 3m, that isn't the hypotenuse (of the triangle)
they've provided a diagram for you
ohhhhhhhhhhhh wait i get it
stop help
i get it
thanks
can u help me with the part b?
b is asking for surface area
how do u figure out that again?
its the perimeter of the triangular base
times the length
and twice the area of the triangular base
whats the perimeter of the triangular base
6.8?
actually firstly
whats the length of the hypotenuse
clearly you must have calculated it by now
2.8
i hope this is clear enough
thats the triangular base
now whats the perimeter of the triangular base
6.8
good
now multiply it by the length
id prefer to call it height but according to the problem its the length
so 6.8 x 3?
yea
20.4
ok now calculate the area of the triangular base
the height is not 3
so times it by 2?
yes
24.4
ok now round it to what the question desires
btw the answer can also be 25 if you put the exact value of sqrt(8)
Closed by @noble carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this? find supremum and infimum
i have no idea where to start
Max and min ?
the text says to find sup and inf
is B a subset of the real numbers
It doesnt say anything about it
But yes i suppose
I used the AM GM inequality
Though I only proved that 4 is a lower bound of n/m + 4m/n, not the GREATEST lower bound
i think it is the greatest lower bound
cuz its greater than or equal to 4
so that means it can equal 4
it cant be less than 4
ye
.close
Closed by @gaunt temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this?
how do i do this?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@hoary bison
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@hoary bison Has your question been resolved?
yes?
1
graph?
yeah
no i solve everything manually
Same
Try to make perfect square at the denominator then go with partial Integration
which denominator 😭😭
It's just one way you could use substitution such as t

I solved it geometrically
graph?
did u graph it on ur own?
ofc
how do we make the graph
The integration can be interpreted as " extend h to x positive and negative
If manual answer what you were looking for
breaking my neck to see the images lawl ty thooo 😭😭
then?
lemme seee
Then find the area between g(x) and x-axis
The intervals are 1-h and 1+h
from where did u get those tersm
Rectangle formula..
hold on
Oo my bad it is a method called partial Integration in which when the denominator from like factor of 2 bracket you assume them as 2 factor or you could call it foresight hehe
what's that orange bar above x axis for?
and those green lines they're for x+h and x-h ?
That’s a part of g(x)
yes, the green line are x-h and x+h individually
where did u get x²-x+6 ? tahts my doubt
ohhhh
Isn't it part of questions and numirator
you're asmwerjmg to @scenic loom 😭😭
I just changed the way of how the question looks and
which is x-h and x+h cause idk which u considered as x
x=1, as the question demands
Green line
ok so what will be the values of l and b?
l?
yeah
I suggest you give it a try first 🙂
im not getting ittr
Take this as reference
here me out
you took it as 1-h and 1+h
so how do i find it's length and breadth 😭😭
what does "g(x) =0 otherwise" mean in question
what's the value of that orange bar
It says if x is between-1 and 1
g(x) becomes 1
or else it becomes 0
That’s how I graphed it
@hoary bison Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Of a moving object, the velocity v (in m/s) depends on the time (in seconds) in the time interval [0,4] is given by the formula: v(t) = 8- t*sqrt(t).
Calculate the average velocity in the time interval [0,4].
I got -4,8 but answer says 4,8
Can someone explain those problems to me please. I’m in 7th grade Germany if this is important.
4.8m/s?
yh
can you show ur working
this channel is taken, please send your help message in an available help channel
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
dang there was a command for that
lol ok
Closed by @flat flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the x1 and x2 in vieta's formula
x1 and x2 are the roots of the quadratic you have
you can usually get that by factoring
or quadratic equation/formula
do you have a picture of the question
@rigid trail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for a sequence like this is the formula this:?
or is it a0
$u_{n+1} = 5u_n$
fukwerint
$u_{n+1} = 5*5u_{n-1}$
fukwerint
$u_{n+1} = 5^3u_{n-2}$
fukwerint
$u_{n+1} = 5^{n+1}u_{n-n}$
uhh
fukwerint
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Neither
You tell me
The down one ig
Just substitute n = 1 in both and see which works 😂
But then do all sequences start with an index of 0?
Or like does it depend on the sequence
So for this the first term is a0 so that means that is actually the first term
Okay so doesn't depend on the index but depends on whatever is first
Yup
Closed by @naive egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this question, how do we know what the independent and dependent variables are? In this case, do we think of x as a function of both y and z or do we think of x as an independent variable?
It'll be considered a constant here, because you're specifically taking the derivative w.r.t. z.
It's a implicit differentiation here : take the derivative in z across the board and make sure to use the chain rule to get the dy/dz popping out.
but in general how do we know whether to consider something as a constant or an independent variable
what gives that away?
In general you should assume that variables are independent unless (1) specified explictly (2) you can infer it. Here x isn't discussed at all, so it's a constant when taking the derivative w.r.t. z.
y isn't explicitly mentioned, but computing dy/dz tells you that they should be linked in some way.
ah ok makes sense
and yea ig the partial derivative tells me that y has to be a function of z and x
thanks!
.close
Closed by @noble ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm a bit lost here:
im trying to write an algebraic expression for the distance from 0,0 to x,y
at first i thought the pythagorean theorem
(this is in euclidean distance)
yes
that's it? i got it right?
yes
what is an algebraic expression for the squared distance from 0,0 to x,y? does that mean the first part of this would by a+b=c and the second part is a^2+b^2=c^2?
wdym first part second part
the first problem was "write an algebraic expression for the distance from 0,0 to x,y" and the second part is "what is an algebraic expression for the squared distance from 0,0 to x,y"
a+b=c never appears in pyt
how would you define the difference between the distance from 0,0 to x,y and the squared distance from 0,0 to x,y
not here
Ok, where can I ask question?
if the first part of the problem is just the pythagorean theorem then i am stumped on the second part
try drawing a triangle first
Sorry, thank you so much
one sec let me grab my scrap paper
ok, i drew a right triangle
where is x and y
In the first part you calculate the distance, in the second part you multiply that distance by itself
0,0 i think
so the first part is just a^2+b^2=c^2 and the second part is (c^2)^2? because you're basically mirroring the first operation which gives you the lengths of the sides of the triangles?
so am i right in thinking if you take c^2 and ^2 it again you would basically wind up with a square in some way i cant envision in my mind's eye
when they say "write an algebraic expression", they don't mean "write an equation whose solution is the distance", they mean "write an algebraic expression that evaluates to the distance"
i feel dense but i dont grasp the distinction
x^2 + y^2 = c^2 is an equation where c is the distance
i just googled it
but they're not asking for an equation
they're asking for the distance in terms of x and y
an expression is a number, variable, or combination of thoe and operation symbols, and equation includes an = sign that connects two expressions
so you need to solve an equation and the solution of that equation is the answer
yes, exactly
my initial thinking keeps going back to the method im sure is wrong which is (pretend this is subscript) (x2 - x1) + (y2-y1) but that's the taxi cab metric
and it wouldnt be a^2+b^2
(x-0)+(y-0)
no that cant be right
you can draw a diagram and a right triangle and use the pythagorean theorem to form an equation that the distance c must satisfy
so then i was right in my thinking x^2+y^2 for the expression, and by not including the rest of the pyth theorem it answers the question without being an equation
thank you for your patience with me btw, it's been many years since ive been in school
many many years
no worries
but what question does the expression x^2+y^2 answer?
Like what geometric quantity is that equal to?
the length of the hypotenuse which gives the distance from the point of origin (0,0) in euclidean distance, i think
The pythagorean theorem states that x^2 + y^2 is the square of the distance from (0, 0)
which is not the same as the distance itself
am i missing something fundamental from early math
except in very specific cases, such as if x=1/sqrt(2) and y=1/sqrt(2)
i have some gaps in my knowledge
Well have you done any exercises related to the pythagorean theorem recently?
yes, on khan academy
do you ever remember taking a square root?
it was back in 8th grade math
no
i think we've just identified another gap i need to work on
Square roots are pretty handy to understand
c is the hypotenuse or distance right?
what does c= ?
c= the square of the hypotenuse, and to get the distance we would get the square root of c
so then if i take the distance from 0 like this
yes
since the origin is 0,0 then (x - 0)^2 + (y - 0)^2
and then you
square root the answer for the distance?
yes
to brush up on this on khan academy i should keep doing pyth theorem stuff?
can you write down the answer so i can check
write an algabraic expression for the distance from (0,0) to (x,y) would be √(x-0)^2 + (y-0)^2 write an algebraic expression for the squared distance from (0,0) to (x,y) would be (x-0)^2 + (y-0)^2
Closed by @prisma basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
🍞
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im having trouble constructing the ranges for tan(x)
so I know that there are 2 cases here
the top being positive and the bottom being negative or the top being negative and the bottom being positive
so it simplifies to
$\tan x \ge -\sqrt 3 \ \tan x \le -1$
nashira._.
nashira._.
so I tried to solve these 2 series of equations and I cannot seem to correctly get the ranges of tan
u can make 2 tables and see when the top is negative and when the bottom is negative and compare the two tables
@true olive
and what u do in cases of periodic functions is you look at the range [0,2pi]
and then add $+k \cdot 2\pi , k\in \mathbb{Z}$
spookyspaghetti
@true olive Has your question been resolved?
the problem in this case is that some of the answers are in the negative domain
here is the answer
oh then u look in this interval my bad [-pi/2 , pi/2]
and then u can see u add +k*pi , K in Z
now how do I construct the intervals for tan? cause ik they are kinda different to cosine and sine
since tan is only negative in the second and fourth quadrants, how can I translate that to make the answer that's where Im so stuck
u look at the interval $[\frac{-\pi}{2} , \frac{\pi}{2}]$ this way u have all the values than tan can have in the intervall
spookyspaghetti
shit im still not getting it
How would I plot a unit circle from the negative domain in this case?
wdym plot a unit circle from the negative domain ?
like u know the way the unit circle will start from 0 to 2pi? is there a way to now show it from -pi/2?
no u just only look at that part of the circle
the u can look at the 4th quadrant as negative angles
so the 4th quadrant is from 0 to -pi/2
@true olive Has your question been resolved?
@true olive Has your question been resolved?
@true olive Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I currently doing this right?
@nova pumice Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
are u finding derivative?
Yes
what are u differentiating? and why is there a x^2+3
f(x) = (it wasnt written in)
because there is
?
the question had no x^2+3?
what is f(x)?
oh, 4x/(x^2+2) with respect to x at 2?\
yes
ok i get u want it to have the same denominator at the top right?
but there should not be a +3, it should all be +2
yea um let me think about it. but i think it will be a bit long either way
let how to get from the second to the last?
yeah
i understand the top part
but i dont get the denominator
like why is it thisfrom that big expression
i dont get it
its abh
could you elaborate please
its from the denominators of the previous stuff
ok first ignore the h
the h at the bottom i mean
okay
actually let me just give another example
$\frac{a}{b} +\frac{c}{d} = \frac{a}{b} \frac{d}{d}+\frac{c}{d} \frac{b}{b}$
esthesia
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
esthesia
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
i see
what are we combining here though? I understand this because they are on both sides but why (x^2+2)h
its similar but do this
and we have a /h below so we add that h at the end
ohhh ok thank you
and now do i just miltiply everything here?
probably at the top yea, at the bottom you probably leave it as it is
eye eye
and u try to factor something and cancel stuff at the top and bottom probably?
ill try it
Unsure where to go now
Do I just factor a h out of everything on the top?
hm yea u can cancel one h
What now
ok
It’s not how she wants us to do it 😭
Yes
I don’t think there is anything else I can do
Oh yeah
Tanks
.close
Closed by @nova pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
how do i solve this
You should split the fraction
how
Using addition properties
Just divide the numerator and the denominator with x^3
That also works
im sorry how? 😭
-9/3
?
yes
Just split it into ||-3x - 1/(3x^3) and by the linearity of the limit operator you get two limits. One goes to -inf, one to 0||
Spoilers Light, don‘t check if you want to work it out yourself
regardless what you just said doesnt make sense for me anyways
Ty, didn’t come up with it that the first glance
Well then you can proceed with SkyAndNight‘s way if you understand that better
No hard feelings haha
You divided it incorrectly
ok divide the whole thing
You’re supposed to get -9x-1/3 in the end
It’s ok
oka
Closed by @nova pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185>
lemme check
amen
the answer should be -3
i got that too at the bottom
ahhh okay
wrong emoji
💀
i also asked because photomath said it was -6
which i thought was odd
nice
do you know formula to solve this?
?
d/dx (a/f)
ah sorry i dont even know what
d
is
we just got introduced to derivatives
im sorry
Closed by @nova pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
so btw d is differential
oka
.reopen
✅
do i just plug in 7
If you just plug in 7 then you should carefully observe the outcome
If you put 7 what will be your outcome?
So, what is anything divided by 0?
inf
Yeha. Got it.
So what you observe is that when the x = 7 something undefined and infinite things are happening. So limit is saying you to approach towards 7 and observe your outcome.
To observe what's happening if x approaches toward 7 You can apply L hospital's theorem.
okay tanks
one more question
how would i solve this if the rational function was top heavy?
Do you know what's L hospital theorem says?
Okay listen. L hospital theorem is applicable for any differentiable function.
ok
We don’t suggest using l’hopital’s rule though
It’s not a good way to understand limits
You can divide the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x (i.e x^2)
It is if you can visualize what is slopes are doing at that point of time.
But OP clearly can’t, which is why they’re asking the question…
Ooooo
Then it's okay to do algebra manipulation 😋
Sorry
In general, we almost never encourage using L’hopital’s rule for limits on this server
Even though it’s a good tool for limits, if you introduce that too early many don’t even bother learning actual limit manipulation techniques
Can u help me with these two pls then I go sleep 💤
yeha. actually understanding the standard limits is important before learning what the slopes of the functions are behaving.
(Idk what to do if it’s bottom heavy)
What do you mean by bottom heavy?
factorize tge denomenator ig
Degree on bottom is heavier
Than numerator
The second one can just be solved by simple substitution, there’s no indeterminate form there
its same both are x^2
If that’s the case then as x tends to infinity the limit is 0
You can see this again by dividing the numerator and denominator by the largest power of x (i.e x^3)
And if it was negative infinity?
Same thing
It would still be 0
Yes
So I can just plug in 5 for x normally?
And if the degree is larger on the numerator then it goes to + or - infinity
How would I know if there was one (sorry I am slow
If the denominator was becoming 0 at x=5 then there’s a discontinuity
There are many examples
For example in the floor/greatest integer function there’s a discontinuity at every integer
A polynomial is continuous everywhere
A rational function of two polynomials (like the one you have) has discontinuities wherever the denominator becomes zero
Ok thank
@nova pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
How can I calculate this?
do you know the power of log rule
I just actually forgot that.
$b^{log_b{x}}=x$
Btw I just saw you asking a question of function. 🙃
b is the base here ig
Can you just say me that how it is derived
Amby
yep
i was figuirng out how to get the bot to do that
If you are free for a moment can you teach me how you can write and that bot beautifully converts into a mathmatical font.
Like this @scenic roost
If the base is same then this function returns the input value since log is inverse of the exponent.
Understand Logarithmic function. It is inverse of exponential function with restricted domain of x greater than zero. Related videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHTNrIFhtUo&index=2&list=PLJ-ma5dJyAqoyxTXAb8rtpbnvROunZuEC
https://www.youtube.c...
Ok I will Watch this
search up latex math equation tutorials
theres a whole bunch on there
The latex code is converted by the bot right?
Btw the ans is 7 here right?
yep
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @scenic roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
$2^{\log_{2} 7} = 7$
Avirup
I did it. Yay
.close
Ok ok
good job tho
Why I can't use them? Why those channels are blocked for me
Are they blocked for you too @scenic roost
Do you what is happening? Regarding this @scenic roost
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
according to a video i found on youtube on finding the lcm of fractions, the answer for the first item is 12/5
but why is it not 6/5? when i try to solve it, it seems to me that 6/5 is the lower answer that is a multiple of all three given fractions
it's because 4/20 isn't simplified; if you for example turn 2/5 into 4/10, then you get a hcf of 10 and your lcm is 12/10 = 6/5
if you turn it into 8/20, you get a hcf of 10 again but a lcm of (8, 3, 4) = 24 = 12/5 again
if you do it to 2/5, 3/10, 1/5 then you get an lcm of 6/5
oh wow, that's crazy. so that means, your lcm changes if your fractions aren't in reduced form?
No, sorry - the results you get from this technique change but the lcm is always 6/5
Should've been clearer
ohh ok. so, am i right in saying that to use the technique properly, u have to first reduce all the fractions to get the right answer?
If you don't fully simplify your fractions then it seems weird things happen
Closed by @restive spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there any short formula like this series have?
@rapid horizon Has your question been resolved?
idk u should do it
@rapid horizon Has your question been resolved?
@rapid horizon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm guessing you need to find the basis matrices of W
Basis matrices?
I'm not too sure tbh but my guess would be write the general matrix in W as a linear combination of n matrices (and those would be the basis matrices that span the subspace W) where n would then be the dimension
What should I do for a+b+c?
separate the matrix into n number of matrices (where you need to figure out what n is), where each of them only depend on one of a,b,c
1x1?