#help-38
1 messages · Page 111 of 1
ah i see
but how do i use (i)?
because for (i) i just proved the amount of subsets of A = {1,2...n} where k is the maximum number
so here i am trying to prove that the sum of all subsets with maximum length i from i = 0 (empty set) to i = n-1
it doesn't start from the empty set
ah ok it starts with 1 number
it starts with 1
what do u mean by this
like to match these things you have to shift by 1
just to say the left side is max 1 to max n
$\sum{i=0}^{n-1} = 2^{1-1}+2^{2-1}+\dots+2^{n-1} = \sum{i=1}^n 2^{i-1}$
Derivative
welp didnt work
but yes i had done this
before
here
except i started at 0 by error
ok so now i have
$\sum_{i=1}^n 2^{i-1}$
Derivative
which is the sum of the cardinality all subsets where "i" is the maximum number.
yea you just have to explain why this is 1 less than all subsets
?
Whats up
good u
it has to be the empty set
because look
let n =3. lets do the process
if i =1, we get {empty set} and {1}
if i = 2 we get {1,2} {1}, {empty set}, {2}
but notice that, in i =2, {1} was already in the previous set
so basically the subsets of a smaller i will always be in i+1
if i can explain it properly
like for i =1 we get {1} and {empty set}
if i =2 we get every subset of i=1 + other subsets
I'd put it that all nonempty sets obviously have a max
ah yes
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Anyone know how to find x and y? I am stuck.
30 44
----- + ------ = 10 ------------ 1
x - y x + y
40 55
----- + ------ = 13 -------------- 2
x - y x + y
It's understandable, it is a nonlinear system of equations
Have you tried common denominator x²-y²?
yeah, I've tried that, but it lead me to Hyperbola situated solutions.
let 1/x-y = p and 1/x+y= q solve as linear equation in one degree
Ok, let me try that. Also, don't mind me asking though, but how you get 1/x-y = p and 1/x+y = q?
It just looked like linear equation in 2 degree in that way
Plus our teacher taught that manipulation so
Alright i'll do it.
Is (8, 3) the solution
yes i get 8,3 as well
Yes 8,3 is satisfying so it must be it
@foggy belfry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @foggy belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i solve these types of questions ?
And how are they saying the answer is 7,8 or 9
Well let's look at the first condition:
f(1)>0 then
f(1)=(1-a)(1-b)>0
In order to get a positive value a and b must both be greater than 1.
yes
Then we can look at the second condition
f(4)=(4-a)(4-b)<0
With this and the previous one we all see that a and b can't be the same numbers. I forgot to mention that before.
If a is smaller than 4 but bigger than 1 (so 2 or 3), then b has to be bigger than 4 and vice versa
oh ok
Third condition
f(7)=(7-a)(7-b)>0
So either number is 2 or 3. Let's say a for gernal sake.
Then one term is positive. So the other one can't be negative nor 0. So the numbers 1-6.
But the first condition said numbers have to be bigger than 1, so b must be between 2-6.
But the second condition said if a is smaller than 4 which it is, the other one has to be bigger than 4, so b must be 5 or 6
So one number is 2,3 and the other 5,6
2+5=7
2+6=8
3+5=8
3+6=9
So you really have to look at all the conditions given and try working out what that means for your numbers

.close
Closed by @old plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help can anyone help me solving these
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
I'm new to negative powers
Do you know what it means to have negative powers?
not rlly
Do you know about fractions?
yes
Do you know about power rules?
Yes
$(a^b)^c = a^{bc}$
Frosst
You know about this one?
Yes
Frosst
Alright
Now when we see $a^{-b}$ then we use the first rule to get $(a^b)^{-1}$
Frosst
Then by the definition of this $\cdot^{-1}$ thing it is simply $\frac{1}{a^b}$
Frosst
Do you think you can try these questions and see how you go?
Horrible Creator [GD]
Horrible Creator [GD]
Closed by @tranquil kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain why the graphs looks like this?
the formula of the graphs are in the top left. there are two.
when you substitute numbers in for x, the results are plotted and connected in the graph on the right.
for example, when x = 0 there is no solution, so there is no dot to connect when x = 0 and thus theres no green line anywhere at zero.
keep plugging in numbers for x and you'll get graphs that look like the ones produced in the image. x = 1, or x = 2, or x=3 ect ect
when i put in different x values it only becomes a straight line
is this supposed to happen
so as long as x is defined it doesnt look like that?
its not straight, its "almost" straight
1/x gets realllllly close to zero so it looks like a straight line when x gets larger and larger
wdym
are you doing 6/3 or something instead of 6/x?
im trying things
i dont understand why it doesnt look like that when its defined
i know that
but when x gets smaller and smaller the whole value of the number becomes bigger and bigger for 1/x when x is positive. thats why there is a curve portion and it goves up
ohh
but like what are you typing
f(x)=6/3
then it looks like a straight line
for any value of x, f(x) is 6/3
so it is a straight line
these two functions are fundamentally different
think about it like this:
f(0) = 6/3
f(1) = 6/3
f(2) = 6/3
and so on
you are mixing up f(x) = 6/x with f(x) = 6/3 = 2
or another way to put it (the y value of the graph) = 6/x is mixed up with (the y value of the graph) = 2
when you type f(x)=6/3 into the graphing calculator it will always tell you that the y value of the graph is 2, that is why its a straight line.
when you type f(x) = 6/x the graphing calculator will show you a graph with all sorts of different x value
but the graph is confusing me
ohh
i had to make a small change to the last sentence, oops! 😄
.close
Closed by @twin mortar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
3 or 2
also why does it say "left hand side of equation converges" if its given to be equal to 1
can you notice that $4^x$ is just $(2^x)^2$ and similary for 8, 16, 32...
deltaG
are you aware of sum of GP till infinity
yeah
isnt common ratio 1^x/2^x
no
oh
common ratio will be any $\frac{n+1'th\ term}{n'th\ term}$
deltaG
so $\frac{4^x}{2^x}$
deltaG
oh i think i got the asnwer
which is equal to 2^x
i got x= -1
correct
what
it was my choice to waste my time here(here as in, on discord), not yours, why are you sorry?
nah i thought i wouldve needed more assistance
i couldve applied a bit more of thought before coming to the conclusion of seeking help on discord
well you should do this next time then
Closed by @mild epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1 or 2
i was thinking maybe solve for theta
and sub it into the equation above
but idk how to go about it
Yea that sounds reasonable
maybe not solve for theta, but you can certainly solve for $\sin(\frac{\theta}{2})$
kheerii
you can write the given function purely in terms of sin(x/2)
yeah im doing it rn as we speak
which one theres 2
oh nvm
let me do that
4cos(2(1/2 x)) -3sin(1/2 x)
i got 4 - 8sin^2(1/2 x) - 3sin(1/2 x)
used double angle identity on cos
and converted all terms to sin
yes indeed
sin(theta/2), yes
and you replace sin(x/2) with the value of sin(theta/2) that you get
from the other equation
from there you'll have a quadratic, which you can use to solve the remaining
Closed by @mild epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Calculate the triple integral:
The area Ω is located in the first octant of space (where all coordinates are positive)
and bounded by the cylinder... and the plane ...and the coordinate plane.
Change x = 6u, y = 7v, z = 5w, and you grind tedious fraction calculations at the expense of a trivial Jacobian."
So what it s the issue with this question?
i dont know where to start do i just switch out x y and z or what do i start with?
So I assume you want to evaluate integral of this form. With respect to specific conditions you have in the question
yes i think so
Wait how is that pre university math?
no it is university
Can you give me theink to this paper or anything releated to it?
what do you mean?
I mean is it specific topic releated question? Because if it is there is might be some important context for solving it.
This video explains how to perform a change of variables to evaluate a triple integral.
Do you know how to do this?
hmm i think i do a little as least
Alright we have x, y, z in terms of pther variables so we now know what they are for.
Now we need to figure out why we need this equations
So I think you can find x in terms of y or z
Which we probably need for this transformation.
But, just give me a minute
@modern ferry Has your question been resolved?
do i calculate the jacobian determinant?
yes
so fast
haha
so 210?
the matrix is | 6 0 0, 0 7 0, 0 0 5| i think
so does the integral become (6u) * 210?
,,\iiint_\Omega 6u \cdot 210 : \dd u \dd v \dd w
haha yes
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
haha yes
but what are the bounds?
now we need the bounds
asking the right questions
well
we know x/6 = y²/49
y = 7v
and x =6u
so in terms of u
6u/6 = (7v)²/49
and the numbers seem to fit
u = v²
so in the uv plane we have a parabola
which makes sense i think
in terms of x we would also have a parabola
no it has to be u = ...
yeah 0 to v^2
oh okay why?
the 2nd equation is the bounds for v
if you solve for y
you are bounded in the first octant, so lower bound is 0. The upper bound is v^2 which is easy to see if you draw the projection of omega onto the uv plane
Is this integral even have bounds?
We told it has certain area.
Do we have limits for this area?

imagine drawing a line from v = w =0, along the u axis until you reach an edge of omega. This edge will be u = v^2
Is this integral need limits?
yes because it bounded
for the last bounds you need to find the intersection between those two equations
So what is our original volume we apply Jacob?
Like we have x and function of x and y and y and z.
And omega somewhere than we given substitutions for x and y and z.
So sketch refers to volume we apply Jacob?
So which points of intersection goes to first integral?
i think she got a point, if we integrate over the parabola we are leaving the first octant, so that can't be it quiet
it should
what do you mean?
v² implies that v can be also negative
I think changing the order of integration would work better then
yes
to dz dy dx
they are showing here only a part of the parabola int xy plane
which would imply a square root function
so can we not use the bounds?
,,\int_0^{1} \int_0^{\sqrt{u}} \int_0^{1-v} 6u \cdot 210 : \dd w \dd v \dd u
So the 2nd equations implies v + w = 1 which is w = 1 - v
so 0 to 1-v
2nd one is what you suggested yummy
third one implies 0 to 6 in terms of x
so in terms of u = x/6
0 to 1
what you got

i think i got those too
[ 1260\int_{0}^{1} \int_{\sqrt{u}}^{1} \int_{0}^{1-v} u \dd w \dd v \dd u ]
shsgd
but was u not from 0 to v^2?
😂
which yields 21
sorry no just kidding
yeah u should be from 0 to 1-v
how did you get 1 to sqrt(u)
,rccw
right, so you project Omega onto the xy plane, and integrate that shape along z
yes
oh I got it!
you are constraining it
you are saying do sqrt(x) but until y = 1
makes sense
yeah
21 right?
yes!
,,\int_0^{1} \int_{\sqrt{u}}^1 \int_0^{1-v} 6u \cdot 210 : \dd w \dd v \dd u = 21
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
SO COOL
@modern ferry Maybe this will help you
can i move out the 6 when integrating?
ohh right
okay do i put in the bound so that i get u(1-v)?
or wait
i am confused
what with
I just wolfram'd it

well only 5 questions left haha
Till when ?
it as supposed to till this wendsday but he moved it till next week
So next week before wendsday?
yes

haha
"Determine the volume V and the center of gravity"
this seems crazy but maybe it is not that hard
Are you doing physics?
what module is this for
Alright it have 0 graphs should be easy
hmm i am not sure he does like mixed questions somethimes
Oh wait it actually have graphs
do we start by finding the bounds here too?
Yes
yeah, you probably want to use spherical coordinates
You mean polar coordinates but in 3d?
In mathematics, a spherical coordinate system is a coordinate system for three-dimensional space where the position of a given point in space is specified by three numbers, (r, θ, φ): the radial distance of the radial line r connecting the point to the fixed point of origin (which is located on a fixed polar axis, or zenith direction axis, or ...
wow okay
What is u tho?
im not sure what that mean but is this not correct
u?
do you mean x?
ohh sorry yes
But we have boundary conditions for area and we have tripli integral which we can transform, but how is LHS working here?
Yeah it is
x^2+y^2+z^2
Is a sphere and we have area bounded somewhere inside the sphere
Wait are we ment to substitute x/6 and y/7 and z/5
And then use it to integrate for substituted variables?
i am not sure haha
But it is unit sphere
So how x can be from 0 to 6?
No I am not sure,
You definitely right in takin square root of x y z expressions
But not sure how to use them
<@&286206848099549185>
Wait we integrating a vector
it seems like it haha
We introduce the spherical coordinate system and use it to evaluate a triple integral.
http://www.michael-penn.net
http://www.randolphcollege.edu/mathematics/
so is one bound from 0 to 2pi?
basically we are integrating over a quarter ellipsoid
okay
yea because of the 2nd constraint
pi/2?
φ is the angle between z and y axis
no theta was between x and y
ohh sorry
so i think both go from 0 to pi/2
Is it bounded or it also 0 to 2pi?
Bruh
👍
then do we have r as well?
we are basically doing quarter circles
from 0 to 1?
yes
0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1
0 ≤ θ ≤ π/2
0 ≤ φ ≤ π/2
Why do we want quarter tho?
because
we have an ellipsoid right
but the second constraint says that x y and z are all positive
which is in the first octane
almost like this
Ah yeah quite obvious. You can't get whole sphere and even half if all of them are positive
yes
now we can put it into ux = 1/v integral x dv?
So this question looks more trivial then previous one
ahahah
But there is video of derivation on Internet so it is more trivial.
Ah wait there is the same one for previous question.
You just don't need to read boundary conditions from graph
oh okay
can i put in the bounds now?
or wait we can find v first right?
is v = integrate r^2 sin theta?
dont you have a paper
like this is not spherical tho it is ellipsoid
i cant seem to find something on the internet
hmm okay
x=rasinϕcosθ
y=rbsinϕsinθ
z=rccosϕ
Finding the volume of an ellipsoid using a substitution.
Around 3:28, the formula in red should be u^2 +v^2 + w^2 =1...
,,\vec{\mu} = \frac{1}{V} \iiint_\Omega \vec{x} \cdot r^2 \cdot abc \cdot \sin\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho
mega?
probably a result from the jacobian
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
so actually

,,\vec{\mu} = \frac{1}{V} \int_0^1 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \begin{pmatrix} r \cdot a \sin\varphi \cos \theta \ r \cdot b \sin\varphi \sin \theta \ r \cdot c \cos\varphi \end{pmatrix} \cdot r^2 \cdot abc \cdot \sin\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
pretty yummy
No not yummy
yes
with a little bit of hope
Okay haha
this points to componentwise integration
my differentialgeometry course was so trashy
Oh no
Why?
yes it is that way we integrate componentwise
it was all too fast and unclear
,,\vec{\mu} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{V} \int_0^1 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} r \cdot a \sin\varphi \cos \theta \cdot r^2 \cdot abc \cdot \sin\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ \frac{1}{V} \int_0^1 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} r \cdot b \sin\varphi \sin \theta \cdot r^2 \cdot abc \cdot \sin\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ \frac{1}{V} \int_0^1 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} r \cdot c \cos\varphi \cdot r^2 \cdot abc \cdot \sin\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \end{pmatrix}
😂
🙏🏻 😭

i can't hold my laugh anymore

𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Okay
the first two are sin^2 integral
the thirs we can use an identity
everything else are constants
👍
$\boxed{\int \sin^2(x) : \dd x = \frac{x}{2} - \frac{\sin(2x)}{4}}$ and $\boxed{\sin(x) \cos(x) = \frac{\sin(2x)}{2}}$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Yes for the first one we can use sin* cos
3a * bc / 16V?
,,\vec{\mu} = \frac{abc}{V} \begin{pmatrix} a\int_0^1 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \rho^3 \sin^2\varphi \cos \theta : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ b\int_0^1 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \rho^3 \sin^2\varphi \sin \theta : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ c\int_0^1 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \rho^3 \cos\varphi \cdot \sin\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \end{pmatrix}
yea it kinda looks better
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I hope you are here
Yes I am haha
ok let's apply
,,\vec{\mu} = \frac{abc}{V} \begin{pmatrix} a\int_0^1 \rho^3 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos \theta \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^2\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ b\int_0^1 \rho^3 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin \theta \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^2\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ c\int_0^1 \rho^3 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos\varphi \cdot \sin\varphi : \dd \varphi \dd \theta \dd \rho \end{pmatrix}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I pulled out the other stuff too
Yes
fuck XD
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Yeah that should be painful to type each step
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
you guys still here?
Yes of course


can anyone tell what the last component results to
if plugged in the bounds
it's ok you can cry
the last one with cosine
Haha the last equation?
haha yes
just the bounds and evaluating
,, \left [ -\frac{\cos(2\varphi)}{4} \right ]_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}
Cospi-cos0
1/4-1/4?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Oh wait 1/4+1/4
yes
Wait I am behind
,,\vec{\mu} = \frac{abc}{V} \begin{pmatrix} a\int_0^1 \rho^3 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\pi}{4}\cos \theta : \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ b\int_0^1 \rho^3 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\pi}{4} \sin \theta : \dd \theta \dd \rho \ \ c\int_0^1 \rho^3 \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{1}{2} : \dd \theta \dd \rho \end{pmatrix}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
So we were integrating vector and not f(x, y, z)?
How is that different to doing the same to f(x, y, z)?
it's a vectorial function
𝔸dωn𝓲²s

@modern ferry pls
Yes okay
this is just $\frac{1}{4} \left ( -\cos \pi + \cos(0) \right)$
Yes i see that now
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Derivatives of a scalar with respect to a scalar might be relatively straightforward. Derivatives of vector-valued functions are not impossibly difficult. You can use intelligent matrix and array operations to facilitate the process.
0:00 - Intro
0:48 - What are vector-valued functions?
4:17 - Brief math theory of derivative arrays (Jacobians)
...
Pi/4?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Yeah!
Haha
It’s sin
Oh haha
-cosine
yes
Yes
Yes
Sine(pi/2) is 1
That's true
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
nice
Haha
notice both get to 1
So we get r^3
Yes
last one we get?
Integral of r^3 is r^4/4
😭
Hold on I am getting confused doing all of them haha
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
WOW THIS LOOKS SYMMETrIXAL
Haha yes
ok you already cooked

Noo haha
r^4/4 from 0 to 1 is?
1/4
1/4
ok
You beat me haha
My first victory
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
So what about centre of mass?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
No
we both for the trash
It is sphere so
Ah yeah it might not be centre of mass but it probably is since we don't know anything about gravity
What is that haha
according to google
Goodle
Gooble
Hmm okay
where does it say center of gravity
i dont even trust your translation skills
here haha
tyngpunkten
oh
Balansera ett föremål på fingret, så att det ligger stabilt och inte tippar åt sidan och trillar ner. Då har du jämvikt. Men vad innebär begreppet tyngdpunkt? Du kan hitta ett föremåls tyngdpunkt på känsla, om du balanserar något, fast hur gör du för att veta mer exakt? Tyngdpunkt och jämvikt hör ihop med varandra. Det ska professor Lunatus titt...
If you wake up then you shouldn't be tired 
Haha do you know Swedish?
Not funny sorry
Swedish? I thought it was German
jag vet
4 hours is pretty long time
Hahaha
No it’s Swedish
Yeah it is
Wait so how do we find V?
it's broken German
Ha
that is outta my capabilities I believe
can you post the taska gain
Yes
Yeah we need something on LHS I guess

Yeah maybe
I mean we could solve for V maybe
We need to substitute something for coordinates I guess.
Best@m what is it?
Determine haha
And
Till
,, V\vec{\mu} = \frac{\pi abc}{16} \begin{pmatrix} a \ b \c \end{pmatrix}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Yeah and is a b and c not 6 7 and 5?
oh yes
Is vector u define centre of gravity?
,, V\vec{\mu} = \frac{\pi 6 \times 7 \times 5}{16} \begin{pmatrix} 6 \ 7 \ 5 \end{pmatrix}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Yeah it make sense
it's an ellipsoid
Oh oops
we don't use radius
abc
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
What haha
,, V = \frac{4}{3}\pi abc
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
so 2 steps back
What happened to u?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
wdym
then you plug in abc and you have the vector
mu which is probably center of mass
and volume is just this formula
i hopefully hpe
brb
Yes but how do we find V first?
Because we have Vu=something
And we want V=something
we use this formula
volume of an ellipsoid
i just realized maybe we need to divide by 4 additionally
no 8
by 8
Why?
since it's in the first octane
Oh okay
yea
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
yeah idk i am not that good at math
the math has been to 70 % always above what was really taught
to me
Yes you are haha
Thats always like this /:
What happened to 64?
Oh haha
So anyone good at series questions?
Movie series?
depends
No like summation notation
yes
I recommend prison break
Haha
I have watched
Do you have a question you want to solve?
open a channel
No so it here
I will
Yeah I know
i will try to take a look at
Well I guess I will close this one then
You have 4
Questions
To do
?
Is your book or whatever you have helpful in any way?
I don’t have one at the moment haha
I only have one with questions
But it’s pretty good
What year in university are you?
yes dont at all
I know
Math and physics and whatever I don't care what I will do after university
Oh okay haha
How old are you?
17

?
Indian 100 %
Nuh what
I am not good at math to be indian
And not good at chess either
You seem to know a lot of math
No I don't, I am trying to prepare for step and I don't think I will get anything higher than 3 or 2, that's sucks
Yeah you know more than me haha
you are at least calc 2 level
Ah no I just relaxing from revision by asking questions about problems here
Haha
Well it is I just watch random videos and that's it.
Math at university escalet too quickly
did you have to rpove the riemann hypothesis
No
Closed by @modern ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I drew a radius from each of the centers to perpendicularly bisect PQ and RS
Also extended the radii to intersect each other but I don't think they're necessarily equal
,rotate
,rotate 180
@fickle ledge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fickle ledge Has your question been resolved?
@fickle ledge Has your question been resolved?
ok I'll try it rn
if I need to prove they are all on a circle I'd assume RX*XS = (PX)(XQ) so I'll see what else I can do to prove that
Hmm I still don’t know what to do next
Wait I might have smth
radical axis
Look it up
why are these equal?
yep my bad
ok I kind of get it now
since the distance to the radial axis is the same, the power of point for each of the circles is the same so (PX)(XQ) = (RX)(XS)
where did you get the pdf from
@main drift
Closed by @fickle ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what rule did he use here im confused
how it went outside the bracket
multiply them out then factor dy/dx
oh ok
@untold void Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is 1 + 1
Closed by @slim igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
<@&268886789983436800> |
@slim igloo please dont abuse help channels
He's bored
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with the test statistic pls?
I've gotten 5.49447, but they got 5.491
@fresh gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
there has to be more information, is B a midpoint of AC? they want you to assume it ig because its clearly visible
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @prisma whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
LOGIC/PROBABILITY PROOF
there are 15 premises (you probably only need 4 of them tho)
- P(A | B & C) ≈ 1
- P(A | B) ≈ 1
- P(~A | ~B & C) ≈ 1
- P(~A | ~B) ≈ 1
- P( ~A & C | ~B) ≈ 1
- P(C & A | B) ≈ 0
- P(~C & ~A | ~B) ≈ 0
- P(C | A & ~B) ≈ 0
- P(C | ~A & B) ≈ 1
- P(C | ~A & ~B) ≈ 1
- P( ~C | A) ≈ 1
we want to conclude that ¬(P(B | ¬A & C) ≈ 1) it's very important that these are approximate premises. This for example, means that you cannot use P(C | ~A) ≈ 1 to mean if ~A then C, that makes an assumption that you would need to support, i.e. P(C | ~A) ≈ 1 ≠ P(C | ~A) ≈ 1. Curious to hear what you come up with. Ping me if you want some preliminary results
- P(ABC) ≈ P(BC)
- P(AB) ≈ P(B)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~BC)
- P(~A~B) ≈ P(~B)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~B)
- P(ABC) << P(B)
- P(~A~B~C) << P(~B)
- P(A~BC) << P(A~B)
- P(~ABC) ≈ P(~AB)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~A~B)
- P(A~C) ≈ P(A)
this is in a different format
Along with the proposition to prove:
P(~ABC) << P(~AC)
(note that I just removed the & signs for brevity, ~AB means ~A & B, not ~(A & B))
QUESTION
Is the following a countermodel?? I don't know how to check countermodels, so I need help from someone with that skill
Ω=[0,1] with the standard measure
A=[0, 1-ε²-ε³]
B=[ε⁴, 1-ε³]
C=[1-ε, 1]
Then we find:
P(A|B&C) = (1-ε²-ε³)/(1-ε²) ≈ 1
P(~A&~C|~B) = 0
P(C|A&~B) = 0
P(C|~A&B) = 1
(These are the four hardest ones to check I think, you can check through the rest yourself pretty easily)
On the other hand, we find that
P(B|~A&C) = 1/(1+ε) ≈ 1
@gusty valley Has your question been resolved?
@gusty valley Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> anyone around with a solid basis in probability theory/logic? Who can help me check this countermodel? I don’t know how to do it, but really wanne know whether it works
@gusty valley Has your question been resolved?
hmm, you can simply put in a concrete small value like 1/1000 for epsilon and just calculate
but honestly looks like 1/10 is enough
got it, thanks I will try
anyone here interested in the recent formalisations of the boltzmann brain paradox? I am taking a stab at it with some other guys (DM me if your interested in this project), but im stuck, so wondering if there is some genius here who can find a proof:
There are 11 premises (you probably only need 4-6 of them tho) [P(~AB) is short for P(~A&B)]
- P(ABC) ≈ P(BC)
- P(AB) ≈ P(B)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~BC)
- P(~A~B) ≈ P(~B)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~B)
- P(ABC) << P(B)
- P(~A~B~C) << P(~B)
- P(A~BC) << P(A~B)
- P(~ABC) ≈ P(~AB)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~A~B)
- P(A~C) ≈ P(A)
we want to prove ¬(P(B | ¬A & C) ≈ 1). It's very important that these are approximate premises. This for example, means that you cannot use P(C | ~A) ≈ 1 to mean if ~A then C: that makes an assumption that you would need to support, i.e. P(C | ~A) ≈ 1 ≠ P(C | ~A) = 1.
Countermodel
Ω=[0,1] with the standard measure
A=[0, 1-ε²-ε³]
B=[ε⁴, 1-ε³]
C=[1-ε, 1]
These are the hardest to satisfy:
P(A|B&C) = (1-ε²-ε³)/(1-ε²) ≈ 1
P(~A&~C|~B) = 0
P(C|A&~B) = 0
P(C|~A&B) = 1
The full check:
- P(ABC) ≈ P(BC): ABC=[1-ε, 1-ε²-ε³], BC=[1-ε, 1-ε³] ✓
- P(AB) ≈ P(B): AB=[ε⁴, 1-ε²-ε³], B=[ε⁴, 1-ε³] ✓
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~BC): ~A~BC=[1-ε²-ε³, 1], ~BC=[1-ε³, 1] ✓
- P(~A~B) ≈ P(~B): ~A~B=[1-ε²-ε³, 1], ~B=[0, ε⁴]∪[1-ε³, 1] ✓
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~B): - same as above -
- P(ABC) << P(B): ABC=[1-ε, 1-ε²-ε³], B=[ε⁴, 1-ε³] ✓
- P(~A~B~C) << P(~B): ~A~B~C=∅, ~B≠∅ ✓
- P(A~BC) << P(A~B): A~BC=∅, A~B≠∅ ✓
- P(~ABC) ≈ P(~AB): ~ABC=~AB=[1-ε²-ε³, 1-ε³] ✓
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~A~B): ~A~BC=~A~B=[1-ε³, 1] ✓
- P(A~C) ≈ P(A): A~C=[0, 1-ε], A=[0, 1-ε²-ε³] ✓
anticonclusion:
~ABC=[1-ε²-ε³, 1-ε³], ~AC=[1-ε²-ε³, 1]
=> P(~ABC) ≈ P(~AC)
=> P(B | ~AC) ≈ 1
additional premise
however, we found an additional premise, namely: P( ~A | ~B~C) >> P( A | ~B~C), which contradicts the countermodel:
P( ~A | ~B~C) >> P( A | ~B~C) means (by def. conditional probability) that P(~A~B~C) >> P(A~B~C): ~A~B~C=∅, A~B~C=[0,ε⁴] ❌
I'm super stuck... So wondering if anyone here can find a proof with this additional premise: a proof would solve the Boltzmann brain paradox or is there are countermodel? Curious to hear your thoughts <3
Hey guys I'm Dutch, what's this channel for
@gusty valley Has your question been resolved?
@gusty valley Has your question been resolved?
@gusty valley Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> is there anyone familiar with probability theory?
Nope
Only basics
@gusty valley Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gusty valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey I need help calculating the p-value for my dataset (in picture). I can do everything else like r value mean, standard deviation, but hypothesis testing just doesn’t make sense to me. Thanks.
I asked earlier today but couldn’t wait around, so I’m hoping I can lock in bc my papers due in a couple hours 😶
<@&286206848099549185>
Help pls..
It’s a value used to describe the likelihood your results are statistically significant
Basically lower p-value = less chance the results were random and the null hypothesis is true
And vice versa
most tests use (p<0.05)
meaning 95% of your data is confidently statistically significant
Or 95% chance your results are fine
I’ve looked up a bunch of tutorials and stuff but can’t grasp onto the concept of stuff like tailed tests z scores and such
you can ask chatgpt idk lol
honestly its hard to get help here
yea well idk I joined just for this and saw everyone else’s stuff getting answered within 10 mins
I asked the same question earlier today and waited like 30 minutes while everyone else got answers
yea ig lol
Ok tbh I’m at a dead end this paper is due in 30 and I don’t have enough time 😔😔
I’ll just say I used an online calculator and eat some points off
let me ask chat gpt
No it’s ok I already did and it’s kinda too complicated for me
I don’t think I have time for it anyways lol it’s alright
@spice ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uhm where do i begin with this

