#help-38
1 messages · Page 96 of 1
However, you need to avoid to repeat things like 1111 (x=1, y=11, z=1) and 1111 (x=1, y=1, z=11)
yeah that's the issue
idk how to do casework for double counting tbh
it's 50k but that includes double counting
exactly like the case u mentioned
So, we need to get how many double counting we have
there's probably 46320
idk tbh
i remember coding this before
but yeah
dk how to get it
In this case, let's try to figure out with a simpler question first
(is a good technique)
So, let's just take x in [0, 10] and y [0,20]
omg i have to go
😭
so how are we going to discuss this
ugh
can i dm you later?
bruh
yea
Ok
nah let's see this through
sure
let's consider x in the closed interval
and same with y
let's consider x = 1: y can be anything from 0 to 20 right?
Yes
I meant [1,10] and [1,20]
okay
okay i see
the three digit numbers is what we should be concerned about right?
cuz 2 digits are unique
consider 18 for instance
or 1 and 9 (19)
I think so
but 110 could work like 11 1 or 1 11
4 digits as well
1020
1715, 1218...
No
Because 132 has only one combination
11 0 doesn't work
so we look at the prefix
if the prefix is more than our domain then it has only 1 possibility
so any 3 digit number with prefix [11] has only 1 combination for example
a|bc?
a divides bc?
x=a and y=bc
okay for x = 1
what do we have?
all 2 digit numbers only right?
everything else doesn't work such that x in [1,10] and y in [1,20]
well it works but as in 3 digit numbers would only be counted as 1 as well
110 is only one possible configuration -> 1 10 and not 11 1
Yes
Yes
I think so
so what was the point of that
Getting now x:[1, 10] and y:[1,50]
this is just 20 * 10 yeah
I'm trying to solve this with you as well
I don't know the answer
oh lol
i think we can do the main problem now
x in [1,10] y in [1,20] and z in [1,10]
i reduced y's upper bound to 20 from 50
actually we can just do
x in [1,5] y in [1,10] and z in [1,5]

Our problem is with the y and z
The x is not the problem at all
So, let's broke the ORIGINAL problem into parts
Part 1: y is under [1, 9] and z is under [1,9]
There's no double counting ( 19 can't be y=19 and z=nothing)
this question isn't solvable in 2 minutes right?
i think i'll just skip it
all my questions are supposed to be solved in under 2 mins
this looks like it'd take a lot of time
more than 2 mins tbh
what's JEE?
Are you indian?
no
probably
So, I think you should ask another person to that
it's the double counting nonsense i guess
if we can figure out how to get rid of those
then we're done
Yes
@astral ore Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @astral ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In a triangle ABC, AC = 10, BC = a, and sin A = 3/5.
Decide the values for a in which angle B has two possible angles.
It is unclear to me what to exactly do in order to achieve this. I do however know that if angle B is 90 degrees, then there is only one solution.
Here's is a basic figure that I've drawn for myself to illustrate the situation. Since sin A = 3/5, then we know that the height of the triangle is equal to 6, as sin(A) = 6/10 = 3/5
If I have understood this correclty, "a" needs to be equal to 6 in order for there to be only one possible angle for B, as it would then be 90 degrees.
This is where I reach a full stop at knowing how to find the other a values that make B have two possible angles...
111 to 499
Those are your duplicate cases
Cuz _ __ and __ _ can be identical
But __ and ____ are both unique. And obviously _____ is definitely going to be unique.
Now in between 111 to 499, you also have to skip the places where there is a 0 in the number because immediately allows you to identify the separation.
Also X is always identifiable so that can never contribute to a duplicate case.
Subtract that from all the possible combinations and you'll get your answer.
If it helps: the books answer is:
one angle for a = 6 and a > 10, no angles when a < 6, two angles when 6 < a < 10
@graceful cairn Has your question been resolved?
Can't you simply do it bye sine rule?
a/sin A = b/sin B
a is side opposite to angle A, same goes for B.
So
5a/3 = 10/sin B
so a x sin B = 6
Now B has to be greater than 0
and B has to be lesser than 180.
Take a look at the sine curve from 0 to 180.
It goes up and then down, so each value from (0,1) in the y axis comes twice when going from 0 to 180 angle wise..
aside from a=6 when B=90, all values of a can give two angles for B.
Also a cannot be less than 6 cuz that's the perpendicular height
Although I think a can be greater than 10 and still have two angles for B.
oh wait right
it cannot
the angles repeat afterwards.
I am unable to understand how you went from 5a/3 = 10/sin B to a x sin B = 6. Would you mind clarifying?
Oh, I'm terribly sorry. Seems like I had accidentally replaced 5a/3 with 3a/5.
no worries
it just uses a bit of your reasoning after this point
@graceful cairn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for b if i use the discriminent and show that b^2-4ac is less than 0 when k^2 -2k + 6 = 0
will i still get the marks?
i guess you can say that, the coefficient of x² is 1 which is positive and D<0 so it will always be positive
well much easier to just say, k²-2k+6 = (k-1)² + 5 which is always positive
@flat wing Has your question been resolved?
why will you not?
u just have to show det(B) != 0
det(B) is a quadratic so showing that it has complex roots answers your questions
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @grave slate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just confused on notation here forget what this means
Closed by @wheat spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
finding the bounds for this, found that 1≤r≤2cosø just fine but
the bounding for ø is where im struggling
given 1 = 2x
1 = 2rcosø
while I can see how ø would be -π/3≤ø≤π/3 why are they just ignoring the r
well it's a point on the unit circle x^2+y^2 = 1 so i guess r = 1 there
Closed by @old field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it is right
well
-x=90-9x
wait
did u do the multiplication right
0.1(-x*10)=-x
i put that into wolfram alpha and it was x = 8
where did u get 8
theres a 10% chance they all fail
yes thats what we are doing
what
okay
theres a 10% chance that they all blow up
and its all or nothing
theres no some dying some not
you showed us the top case
wait
you want to do bottom case?
OH
oh
so we have -x+90-9x=10
-10x=-80
x=8
ohh
yeah 8 is right
i mean
its like
would you rather always win 10 bucks or have a 90% chance of winning 100 bucks
second case has more risk
but its almost always better
@violet pier Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @violet pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this may seem silly
but i was doing this question
but
i dont get this LOL
i would have had the answer too
$3^k + 2\cdot 3^k = 3^k \cdot(1 + 2) = 3^k \cdot 3 = 3^{k+1}$
artemetra
does that make sense?
they factored out 3^k
with practice, yes
ok got it
but in general it never hurts to try to factorize something like this
true especially in a proof question
@south badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
make a rough sketch
no
no?
right
is just an increasing function
why 3?
because the parabola would intersect twice
and then would get catched up to
if that makes sense
oh yeah good point
i forgot about that
lol
yes it's 3
Closed by @vale obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how
@crisp pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you solve this?
Translation:
Let $f: \mathbb{R}^{n+1}} \to \mathbb{R}$ be a differentiable function of $n+1$ variables and assume that there exists a differentiable function $g:\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ such that:
$$f(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n, g(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n)) = 0$$ for all $x_1, x_2, ..., x_n$ (the thing in the paranthesis is irrelevant)
a) Show that: yeah, the thing in the picture
Michael
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
@cursive stream Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what
what do u want
Lmao
Aside from needing to juggle indexing, wouldn't this be an exercise in simply doing the chain rule?
@cursive stream ^
Not quite sure
Hint, what is $\dv{f}{x_i}$ (the full derivative)
OmnipotentEntity
help with a), if that wasn't clear (should've probably said it explicitly)
(In this case, specifically when g is the final argument, so the value of f' is obviously 0, because f is 0 when fed g irrespective)
Ehmm
yeah I don't know, this task just boggled my mind honestly. I thought I understood the chain-rule, but now I'm a little unsure
OmnipotentEntity
Does this look familiar? @cursive stream
Yeah I guess? The book generalised it in this way:
Ok
So apply that formula here
You should get $0 = \pdv{f}{x_i} + \pdv{f}{g} \pdv{g}{x_i}$ which should look familiar.
OmnipotentEntity
alright, but I'm also having trouble with what to choose as the function corresponding to F here
(Considering that g is x_{n+1})
In this case it's f(x1, x2, ..., xn, g(x1, ... xn))
But how do you get to this?
Could you just write it out?
From here #help-38 message
All of the x_i are independent, so it i ≠ j then pdv x_i/x_j is 0
So the only remaining thing left is g
(which is x_{n+1})
What do you mean with independent?
Because if there is no dependency between them then there's no dependency on the derivative either
and to clarify, i and j are just numbers from 1 to n, right?
Oh okay, that makes sense
(I'm not so used to working with generalised notations)
If you have independent variables, then if you do have some kind of equation governing the variable, such as x_i = p(t), and x_j = q(s), then taking the derivative of x_i with respect to x_j is 0, because there is no x_j in the expression
Yeah
Alright yes, very true
Ok but one thing now. I don't see how this formula corresponds to this #help-38 message
soo yeah... still not sure how to apply the formula you wrote out
I'm not sure either, are you certain it's the same formula? Looks different
apologies for all the questions, it's a little late
No clue 😅
I need to go afk
ah okay
Well thanks for the help
I'll let it cook in my head a little
I'll come back to it tomorrow.
.close
Closed by @cursive stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im having trouble figuring out what to after this or if im even doing it correctly
what is the goal?
so basically the derivative?
yes
alright
so we can just differentiate term by term here
so what’s the derivative of 2x?
2
yep
and now for the second term
we have to rewrite it in a way that is x raised to some power
which it looks like you’ve done correctly in the work above
well the third line is correct but the the fourth
so $\frac{-3}{x^{\frac{3}{2}}}$ is what we have
y0shi
how do we move the x up to the numerator?
make its exponent negative?
would the 3 stay in the numerator?
yep
ohh i see
close
or wait i think i did the exponent wrong
yeah
so then after that how do i get the x back down to the numerator?
just negate the exponent again
basically to move it up and down
we just negate the exponent
yw!
@rotund fable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rotund fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did i draw this correctly?
helloo???
<@&286206848099549185>
thanks for the help....
.close
Closed by @azure wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @upbeat ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you do this Q as I tried to set D as the origin then each of the other vertices 1 away from this point and I can only get$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
TEDDY
@iron vector Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
First we need to find a vector perpendicular to the face ABC
(1,1,1) is a good vector to choose
We just need to give the angle between this vector and the ground
I dont understand where this vector is in relation to the other points
Okay let's call the midpoint between B and C "E"
What are the coordinates of point E
If the length is 1, like youve set
Why don't we set D to be the origin
Closed by @iron vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for part d,
the answer is supposedly
why doesn't E[W] = 1(100) + 2(0) + 3(-100) = -200 work
hmm
oh wait X is the # of boxes you open
X = 4 would be 0 (2 no prize, 2 prize)
X = 5 would be 100 once again (2 no prize, 3 prize)
so E[W] = 1(100) + 2(0) + 3(-100) + 4(0) + 5(100) = 300 which is still wrong hmm
oh seems it's because i'm doing E[W] = kW(X = k) instead of E[W] = kP(W = k)
for all values actually not just 1
E[W] = $100 * P(W = $100) + $0 * P(W = $0) + (-$100) * P(W = -$100)
P(W = $100) = P(X = 1), P(W = $0) = P(X = 2), P(W = -$100) = P(X = 3)?
E[W] = $100 * 3/5 + $0 * 3/10 + (-$100) * 1/10 = $50
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @plucky lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, how would I find CDE
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@weak yacht Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i show a function 2xsin(1/(y^4 + x^2)) - 2*(x^2 + y^2)xcos(1/(y^4 + x^2))/(y^4 + x^2)^2 is or isn't continuous (x,y) = (0,0)?
@vague phoenix Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
You have to show that it is discontinuous at x,y = 0,0?
@vague phoenix Has your question been resolved?
how do I do that?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@vague phoenix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could i please get help with b please
let's say, 2theta = x, then cos(2theta) = cos(x) = 7/25
cos-1(7/25) = x
since x = 2theta, cos-1(7/25) = 2theta
theta = sin-1(13/5) as it says
then 2theta = 2sin-1(13/5)
i know
but like
i didnt really get the description of the other message
thank you for explaination
it says cos(2theta) = 7/25
yep
then what is cos-1(7/25) equal to?
uhh 1/2 cos-1(7/25) ?
oh
because you have to ask yourself "What should i write to the argument for the cos function to get the value 7/25"
as it showed us, you should write 2theta
because cos(2theta) = 7/25
do you understand why the answer should be 2theta?
for this
no need to sorry it's okay
if cos(x) = y
then arccos(y) = x
did you understand this well?
thank you so much
you are welcome but you sure you understand it, right?
or no
yess
🫡 😆
thank you
.close
Closed by @pale swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure how to approach this without trial and error
well you clearly can't try infinitely many numbers
how do you know when you can stop looking?
Maybe proof by contradiction? Idk
Try making bounds for both sequences
Or just set the nth term of one equal to the mth term of the other and then use some sort of number theory
Contradiction works
What does that mean
you can also notice that theyre both monotonic and first one is increasing and 2nd one is decreasing, they will only have terms within [-1, 40] in the first couple of terms then quickly move out of that range in opposite directions, so you can just examine the first couple of terms
So basically you let a and b are the 2 numbers that are in these sequences and a is not equal to b
And then you work things out
There will be something that contradicts
Like a = b
Or smth
just list the first 5 terms of each one 😄
or 6 dunno if youre starting at n = 0 or 1
@maiden glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me how we got these values for the first question
do you mean question (a)?
As you can see, the first thing we can put in is the middle one, which is 4 in this case. (4 ppl like all 3 sports)
And since there are 7 people who like both R and F, the ones that are in R and F but not in C are 3.
isw, the ones that are in C and F but not in B are 2.
since n(F)=12, the ones in ONLY F are 3.
Yeah
Oh gotcha
btw the answer to (b) is ||x=7||,
(c) is ||19 and 10||
@frosty heron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@trail zinc whatve u tried
@trail zinc Has your question been resolved?
@trail zinc just differentiate and set to 0, then check for maxima/minima
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im a bit stuck… can you check my work I don’t think I am even on the right track
breakdown the limit into where v(t) > 0 and <0
And integrate separately
You can’t integrate absolute value like that
e^(t-1) > 1
t-1 > 0
t> 1
So anything less than 1 is negative
I’m confused so how do you want me to write it out
Make two integrals, one from t=0 to t=1 and one from t=1 to t=3
Between 0 and 1 the function is negative
So you want to integrate the negative of the function
Since negative of a negative is positive
How do you know this
What do you mean by this
That’s what @signal ether showed above
I didn’t quite understand what Deshak did there
@gaunt belfry
yes?
You want to break down the integral because your velocity is negative for a while (Negative velocity will reduce the distance covered)
So I'm basically checking at what point does the function go from negative to positive and then using those limits to integrate the function
Ah Okay I understand that part! But how do you know to break it down from 0 to 1 and 1 to 3
You want to see where v(t) is positive
So you check v(t) > 0
e^(t-1) - 1 > 0
e^(t-1) > 1
e^(t-1) > e^0
Thus,
t-1 > 0
Hence
t>1
Ahh okay now I see it. So then at 1, that’s where it changes from - to +?
i prefer checking when v(t) is equal zero, then can make a sign chart for when the sign changes cuz it might change several times
Yes
Fair
Now I’m thinking is the answer D? Because if it’s asking for total distance so bc going from 0 to 1 is negative, the negative will make it positive and then u add to get total distance?
D is correct, but I don't follow the second half of the reasoning (The negative will make it positive)
Hmm can u explain why D is correct bc maybe I explained it wrong
The part why there is a negative in front
So yes, the distance is negative for the negative velocity (You're running in the opposite direction)
And positive for the positive velocity
I agree with your explanation
Closed by @jagged sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what exactly is part 3ii trying to get me to do?
what does this mean
I mean it says place an appropriate straight line
So ig make one up and intersect it with the parabola
And find point of intersection
Idfk tho
So it just wants the roots?
Yea
thank you anyways
@maiden glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @maiden glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does it make sense to use intregals hee
here
i do not understand why we used intregals
that’s the graph of f’
we need to find f
and their relationship is via the antiderivative
or the integral
ok but how does it make sense to use intregals
intrregals give area
not the point
yes
but the integral is also the antiderivative of the function
remember the ftc where it states that
$\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx=F(b)-F(a)$
where F(x) is the antiderivative of f(x)
y0shi
well it does give a point
F(b) is a point
F(a) is a point
and F is the antiderivative of f
so it gives the antiderivative of f at the point b and a
then why do we say intregal gives the area
it does both
the area and the antiderivative
they are the same
but it’s just that we use both definitions
ok thanks
yw!
and you can prob figure out why they use those bounds for the integral via the FTC
@fossil cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Sure.
the conjugate should work!
But with conjugate you get 1-x..?
Conjugate works.
Closed by @clever chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no worries.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i have these parameters or what you call them
they look something like this
and i have to find the volume under
the function is
i know if i find a function for the area as a function of x, i think its like the disc method or something
then i can integrate from 3/2 to 5/2
but i seem to get that part wrong
don't need a disc method for this, this is just a 2D integral! Disc and stuff is for volumes (or surface areas)
what integral do you get with respect to y?
right so your integral is $\int_{1.5}^{2.5} \int_{0}^{x^2/2} \frac{1}{x^2+y} dy , dx$
OssihLikesBlue
and you're saying that when you did it you get
$\int_{1.5}^{2.5} \ln (5/2 x^2) - \ln (x^2) dx$
OssihLikesBlue
now you can use ln a - ln b = ln(a/b) to help here
what
this becomes $\int_{1.5}^{2.5} \ln(5/2) dx$
you need to evaluate the inner integral at both y = 1/2x^2 and y = 0 right?
this is the right answer btw
OssihLikesBlue
I guess the question is how?
damn i dont know
this should have been ln(3/2) and thats what I get here too
when you evaluate the inner integral yoy get
ln(x^2 + 1/2x^2) - ln (x^2)
right?
which is
wait wtf yes
basic math fail
happens lol
great, then ln(3/2x^2) - ln(x^2) is just ln(3/2) by properties of logarithms
and so you get $\int_{3/2}^{5/2} ln(3/2) dx$
OssihLikesBlue
OssihLikesBlue
wow i didnt know this
where did you get -ln(x^2) from
evaluating ln(x^2+y) at y = 0
yes
ok
usually you dont have to think about this in 2d right?
when you integrate from 0
but here you have to
you always think about this
whether 1 or 2D
think about integrating x from 1 to 5
you take the value of x^2/2 at 5 and then subtract the value of x^2/2 at 1 from it
no difference here
usually when you put in 0 for x it becomes 0
like the area or volume
cause i guess you add an x to all variables when you integrate
that usually is doing some heavy lifting
that's heavily dependent on the type of function I mean even integrating just x+1 from x = 0 to 2
this doesn't have anything to do with y
if you integrate x+1 from 0 to 2, so (x+1)^2/2, at x = 0 the value is still 1/2
this is only sometimes the case and is not a usual at all
like you need to be really sure before you say its 0 and you always write it out to check
hm ok thanks i didnt know
i guess in my head i assumed that something cant have an area if it has no width
and no volume if it has no thickness
well i gues if you did integrate from 0 to 0 you would get 0
bounds are arbitrary! x = 0 does not correspond to no volume. But you're right that if you integrate anything from x = a to x = a you would get 0!
@late vector Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me what's wrong?
i used the disk/washer method
and why is it negative?
@dim kite Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @dim kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Abdullah Zero 🇵🇸
I'm still not even sure about my first half of the proof so here it is
let x ∈ (A^C ^ B^C)
then x ∈ A^C and x ∈ B^C
then x ∈/ A and x ∈/ B
that means x is in neither A or B
hence x ∈/ A U B => x ∈ (A U B)^C
this feels weird to prove something like this
is this valid?
Yeah but you need both directions
Now prove that if x is in (AUB)^c then it's in A^c intersection B^c
yeye
still though
that last jump from
x ∈/ A and x ∈/ B
to
x is in neither A or B
is this really a valid jump?
coz it's purely common sense
also a lot of this is iff not just if then
so would this be a full proof:
x ∈ (A^C ^ B^C)
<=> x ∈ A^C and x ∈ B^C
<=> x ∈/ A and x ∈/ B
<=> x is in neither A or B
<=> x ∈/ A U B <=> x ∈ (A U B)^C
x isn't in A and x isn't in B implies x isn't in AUB
That's a valid jump
But yes you can make this iff
That works
@solar parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the sum then divide by 2
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
So at the top I have a curve that I am trying to find the critical points + extrema of, but I am having trouble in trying to parameterize the equation. It's not written on the paper, but the boundary of the curve is (x^2)<=y<=4
I just feel that I am having an algebra error in trying to parameterize this thing. I should be able to get x and y in terms of t as a dummy variable... but can't figure it out
wait lol its the boundary i get it now
.close
Closed by @clear topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please explain why is the case
when you do |y| = f(x) it flips it about the x axis and only includes for x > 0
well the function is negative for x<0
so |y| cant be negaitve
Closed by @upbeat pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is 864, right? I’m fairly certain but also I am utter dogshit at combinatorics so
seems legit
Closed by @atomic totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it says this isn't continuous?
it meets all conditions of continuity though
at x=3
what are the conditions of continuity?
f(a) exists, limf(x) exists, f(a)=limf(x)
Does f(3) exist?
I think I made the mistake of simplifying
and finding a hole
hole = discontinuous
I see, thanks
.close
Closed by @potent pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Nah u were right
.reopen
You're right
Nvm I lied
✅
Lmao
Hole does mean discontinuity
yeah
moral of story: do not simplify when taking f(a)
But u can't simplify the fraction here when evaluating at a point where denominator = 0
when do you simplify though
when taking the limit
You can simplify as long as u state x=3 isnt in the domain
because for the limit i just used the original function f(x)
You just have to always keep that in mind
I assume you simplify for convinence
You can simplify when evaluating as a limit
But when evaluating as a function it isn't always possible
yeah
when it's indeterminate
And what makes it even more confusing is desmos doesn't tell u it's undefined until you hover over the point
you do black magic algebra
lol
yeah it shouldn't do that
anyways thanks guys
I think it does that for all removable discontinuities
mm yea I checked the graph thinking I was right
so i came here lol
until I hovered over 3
😂
.close
Closed by @potent pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
moral of the story: dont use graph
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was wondering if
I let A = this matrix
then -1 <= det(A) <= 1
using that formula of u o (v x w)
in the event where v x w is perpendicular, we get the bounds of -1, 0, and 1
but then if they arent
we can get a value in the middle of this
either negative or positive
yea with the u o (v x w) formula you can write it with a cos() or sin() from the dot/cross product formulas and then just go through all the angles theta
it might be weird like you have to choose angles between u and (vxw)
could I involve it with inequalities
I'm not sure how to use inequalities to show that something acquires all values between two things, I'd just pick an example with a cos(theta) in it and say you can vary theta to get everything from -1 to 1
This is fairly easy problem, if you know how to interpret matrices
Where do the basis vectors get sent
Cant do that here
We have vectors as elements
What do the lines mean?
I interpreted this question as meaning that the vectors filled up the columns
Like col 1 is u, col 2 is v and col 3 is w
Yes this problem is not too bad, the determinant is a measure of change in volume
You're bounded by a unit transformation, the rest can only flatten or deform the unit paralleleliped
Therefore the det is bounded by -1 and 1
First time where intuition beats computation
@elder steppe Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Where did u go
mb
I wanted to help:(
Wait open a new help channel
ok
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need to simplify how to do this?
Difference of cubes formula, difference of quartics formula
Closed by @lost minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand the last line in this explanation
isn't the Rightsubdomain of {e1, e2, e3... ek, f1, f2, ... fi)
the {f1...fi) part? And isn't that part irrelevant?
so why are we doing the P function on ONLY the irrelevant parts??? THIS DOESN"T MAKE ANY SENSE
😭
@orchid wadi Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi,
Can anyone help me understand how the axiom of foundation prevents circular sets?
If I understand it correctly, the axiom of foundation says that there has to be at least one element in a set which is disjoint from it. Or ∀X ≠ ∅, ∃x ∈ X, such that X ∩ x = ∅. But how does that prevent a set like A = {1, A}? Wouldn’t 1 be disjoint from A, allowing the set to contain itself and be like {1,{1,{1,…}}}?
@mossy breach Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
The reason why we have the rule 'a set can't be an element of itself' is because the set of all sets that don't contain themselves is a parado
i agree it's confusing
it's just that A = {1, A} implies that {A} is also a thing
you can connect a = {b,a} with the proof I sent by stating a ∈ a already
see that the a thingy is in a, right to left
it won't matter what's b
you have b ∈ a and a ∈ a. If you have worked with line-by-line proofs you can separate the conjunction and still get the contradiction with a ∈ a
so it says "at least one", but it's not clear if it would be different if it said "every element is disjoint" instead
@mossy breach Has your question been resolved?
btw with this a ∈ a you are done
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I'm not quite sure if I understand what disjoint means at this point. Is it correct that in the set B = {2, 3, {4, 5}} 2 and 3 are disjoint because the intersection of 2 or 3 with B is {} but {4, 5} would not be disjoint and yield an intersection {4, 5}?

