Channel closed
Closed by @frail portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 81 of 1
Closed by @frail portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why did they parametrize using x=f(y), x=f(t) so y=t instead of y=f(x), y=f(t) so x=t?
i mean, they could do that
but theyre just asking you to check which one is valid
find 'a' parametrization, there are a number of ways it can be done
oh
I see
the way y=f(x), y=f(t), so x=t feels more natural
so I just found it a little weird
but thanks for clarifying
@crisp flicker Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crisp flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
give me the definition of a derivative
Think of the h as the change in x
and, as that change in x approaches closer and closer to 0, what do you think happens to the function? What does it approach?
So given that solution, which part doesn't make sense?
Can you state the definition of the derivative?
Derivative at some point c on f(x) is limit of f(x) as x approaches c?
Ik what derivatives are because I learnt it in physics but I don’t have the rigour with mathematical statements
In physics it would be rate of change of f(x) at c wrt x
Do you know what a secant line and a tangent line is?
This calculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the definition of the derivative formula in the form of a difference quotient with limits. It explains how to find the derivative of a function using the limit process. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
Derivatives - Fast Review:
https://ww...
Yes
i think he's looking for a conceptual point of view, not a solving point of view
This video from Khan Academy does a very good job explaining the concept of a derivative.
I think the issue is that they've never seen the definition, much less understand it
I agree
So if it was to be defined in one line, how could I do it?
f'(x) = lim [f(x + h) - f(x)] / h
(limit as h approaches 0)
Now, Azar isn't wrong, the conceptual understanding of why this definition relates to tangent lines is super important
But that's the equation your solution is using
good
From my personal experience, watching Khan Academy's videos on differentiation helped a ton. They do a great job of explaining WHY. Organic Chemistry Tutor is good for practicing solving a variety of different problems.
Closed by @onyx badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok what trig function can we use here ?
do we have to solve for both x and y?
yes
honestly idk
i don’t get this concept yet
dyk what tan and sin is
mhm I'll leave it to you from here
(come back in 15 if you are still confused)
okk
@lament stone Has your question been resolved?
help
i sorta get it but it doesn’t make sense
We will start with 30 degrees, what side is opposite of 30 degrees?
4√3
hypotenuse
so sin?
yes!
sin 90?
not quite, its sin 30
ohh
because the opposite of 30 is that 4 rad 3
now, what does sin equal? is it opp / hypo or is it hypo / opp
wait so opposite/hypotenuse is 4√3 / x?
ohh
we know sinx is equal to opp/hypo
so , sin30 is equal to 4 rad 3 / x
now, its a matter of solving for x
so isolate?
yes
wait but i dont rlly get how we got opposite and hypotenuse
ok
so
sin of some angle is equal to the length of the opposite side divided by the hypotenuse
if we look at the triangle
the opposite side of sin has the length of 4 rad 3
so that's our numerator
our denominator, no matter what, will always be the hypotenuse for sin
the hypotenuse is the longest side of the triangle
so whatever the length of that is, is your hypotenuse
in this case it's x
so its (4 rad 3) / (x)
opposite/hypotenuse
but how do we know its suppose to be sin
what abt tan or cos
are you familar with your SOH CAH TOA?
yes
sin is the first thing i saw
if you use cosine, your dealing with the adjacent side and the hypotenuse
and so your dealing with two variables, which is not ideal
ohh
now with tangent, you would be solving for Y
because your using the opposite, which we know is 4 rad 3
and thats over the adjacent
so
does tha tone work too?
it solves for Y
so for this one, it is 7/x as in sin45
ohh
yes
so, the takeaway here is use trig functions that you can solve for, you can't use a trig function if there are two different variables
ohh ok
need anything else
it depends, if you think you will need help in <5 minutes, then yea. But if longer, then close it
okk
tysm
wait i have a question
can u give me an exmaple of when i should use cos?
as you can see, we are given the adjacent side
and we need to find our hypotenuse
cosine involves adjacent and hypotenuse
ohh
so the cos(30) = 3/x
why? cos of some angle equal is equal to the length of the adjacent side (which is 3) over the length of the hypotenuse (which is x)
remember the SOH CAH TOA
That CAH is cosine, adjacent, hypotenuse
@lament stone understand?
Closed by @lament stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I needed somehelp with making a proof
Hi
Paste it here
Okay
Given: Quadrilateral PAST, TX = AX;
||
Prove: Quadrilateral PAST is a parallelogram.
Write your proof in your journal and upload your answer. You will be awarded 5 points for your statements and 5 points for your reasons.
@trail bobcat Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@trail bobcat Has your question been resolved?
TX=AX only this much is given?
Yes
@trail bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Properties of parallelogram: opposides parallel, opposides congruent, oppo angles congruent, diagonals bisect each other, consecutive angles are supplementary
To prove it’s a parallelogram: both pairs of oppo sides are parallel, both pairs of opposides congruent, both pairs of oppo angles congruent, one pair parallel and congruent (side), diagonals bis each other
That’s a visual representation of proving its a parallelogram…I can’t help more, it’s late here. Hope it helped!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think my brain is literally breaking at this point from exhaustion, but can someone pls explain to me why the rationals arent an open set?
this is our definition for open sets
take a rational point you like
0 for example
now take a neighborhood around it
is everything in the neighborhood rational?
but doesn't there just need to be a single neighborhood since its a there exists statement?
ohh wait, are the irrational numbers dense in the real numbers too?
yea
well thats confusing lol
in every neighborhood of 0, there are irrational points
so both the rationals and irrationals are dense
right okay that makes sense
thank you
.close
Closed by @heady summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given this power series, what could the corresponding equation be? I'm confused on how the 6th term cld be negative
I initially thought it wld be (-1)^n * x * n(x)^n
thats the think
i think this an error on the question makers part
since they ask to find where this converges but how can that be when the sequence isnt rlly clear
series*
in that case i think that's an error
Closed by @prisma moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i know how to graph an ellipse cuz its more straight forward with + the sign between the terms
but since for hyperbolas there is - in between terms, im kinda lost
what exactly is your question
idk what else to do other than finding these two points
i just don't know how to graph the
hyperbola
as in graph on paper?
are you asking about the process of graphing without desmos/computationalmethods ?
yeah
just like a scratch
like once you have enough points
you can sketch the graph
on paper
but how do you find all those points
i can only find (-3, 3), (-3, 1) so far
well you take test values for x and y
so like let x = 1, you get a corresponding value for y because the function you plotted on desmos in the screenshot is some y in terms of x
if you put in x=1 here you should get a value for y as well
thats your first coordinate (x,y)
you plot that, and then you repeat the same process with different values of x, getting different coordinates for (x,y) each time
and you connect the dots
the more dots you have, the more accurate your graph
you can directly find all 4 boundary points of the ellipsis
two boundaries have X coordinate -3 as you mentioned
since for the upper/lower boundary x+3 = 0 must be fulfilled ====> x = -3
and for the left/right boundary y-1 = 0 must be fulfilled ====> y = 1
insert x = -3 into the initial equation, solve for y and you get the upper/lower boundary points
insert y = 1 into the initial equation, solve for x and you get the left/right boundary points
these 4 points are certainly sufficient for a good sketch @naive geyser
wait
you can use the + form for the ellipse to graph for both the ellipse and the hyperbola?
i.e. you can just use the ellipse equation to graph an hyperbola?
yeah
regard it like this:
first you determine the ellipsis using the four boundary points
then you find the two lines which limit the behavior of the corresponding hyperbola
and you can draw the hyperbola along these two lines, but deform it towards the ellipsis
such that it meets the upper/lower or left/right boundary points
@naive geyser Has your question been resolved?
yeah
i get what you mean
you basically create like a box
and make diagonal lines through the corners
and then draw the hyperbola
@naive geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So the domain should be all real numbers
And I'm gonna feel so dumb when I realize my mistake
But I'm going crazy over this
Oh god never mind
.close
Closed by @lavish quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me calculating the domain of this function?
hello?
the thing under the root shoulld be positive
mean (x-1)?
At the moment I did this
The solution however should be [1,5], not [2,5]
@trim thicket
,rotate
@trim thicket ?
wait u have to make sure the values on both sides aree positive before squaring an inequation
what does that mean
while squaring on both side, u have to make sure that x-3>0
for x-3<0 the inequality changes
How do I make sure that x-3>0
make 2 cases, for x-3> 0 solve the inequality and take all solution which haas x>3
for x-3<0, solve the inequality with the inequality switches and take all solutions which has x<3
overall solution wud be the union of these 2 solution sets
I don't know how to do so
what is a case
Is it the equivalent of making a system with 2 equations equal to
x > 3
x^2-7x+10 >= 0
@trim thicket
.close
Closed by @fringe plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, i'm trying to prove diagonally dominant matrices are invertible, could someone help clarify if my thought process is correct
therefore Ax = 0 is only possible for x = 0 and hence A is invertible
@astral ore Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @astral ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with this limit
i tried using this formula for the 5^x - sqrt 5 part
And got here
but now im not sure how to continue
can you use L'hopital's rule?
power series?
how?
@neon geode Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@neon geode Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @neon geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i able to do this with u sub
break it down
1/cos^2x + cos^2x/cos^2x
= sec^2x + 1
so now the integral is integrate [0,pi/4] sec^2x+1 dx
yw
.close
Closed by @fair meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the identity used here?
the cos alpha one to cos alpha.cos alpha/2
they multiplied and divided the matrix with cos (alpha/2)
@normal minnow Has your question been resolved?
oh i see
hm
what does the tan alpha change into
i thought it was that tan alpha which changes into sin alpha/2/ cos alpha/2
whats tan alpha/2 . cos alpha/2
i didnt understand that kind of
tan(a/2) = sin(a/2) / cos(a/2) , when you multiply cos(a/2) , the cos(a/2) in denominator of tan one gets cancelled
Closed by @normal minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ooo alright thank u
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @static tendon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(50/x^2)-(2x^2/36)------------Factorise
Please help
make this into a single fraction
as in with a common denominator?
yes
$\frac{50}{x^2}-\frac{2x^2}{36}$
dqvidutzul
yes
what do you think the common denominator could be
18x^2
right, after you simplify the second fraction
after cancelling
and you get
900-x^2/18x^2
$\frac{50}{x^2}-\frac{x^2}{18}$
dqvidutzul
Result:
900
$\frac{900}{x^2}-\frac{900}$
Dying Dog
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
hold up a second
lol idk how to use it
ah yes
dqvidutzul
yup
and thats gonna be your answer
what about the bottom
dqvidutzul
dqvidutzul
now I have [(30+x^2)(30-x^2)]/18x^2
I still dont think its fully factorised tho
,w factorise (30+x^2)(30-x^2)/18x^2
huhhh
so yeah thats the simplest form
no problem, hope you understood
Closed by @sturdy lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I need some help with one hw task
I need to solve 2x^2-5xy-3y^2-16=0
Well I already solved it
I needed to find natural solutions
there is only one answer
7 and 2
But my solution doesnt amaze me
It just some dumb trys and errors
So I want some better solution
add 16 and factor
My solution is to simplify it like (2x+y)(x-3y)=16 and then try and error whilr knowing that both multipliers would be natural too
nice
theres only 5
nice
theres no better way
nah
Could I simplify it into canonic?
I think no
<@&286206848099549185>
I need to solve 2x^2-5xy-3y^2-16=0
My solution is to simplify it like (2x+y)(x-3y)=16 and then try and error while knowing that both multipliers would be natural too
But I HATE try and error
So I want to find another way around
<@&286206848099549185>
why do you need trial and error
enumerate all the ways two integers can multiply to 16
Shut Up I haet math
<@&268886789983436800>
It ain't good
Math is the language in which lord has written the universe 😎
ITS just random useless Numbers
Yeah but this is stupid cause I would get 5 pairs and I need to look at every and try to solve and only one would be right
why is that stupid
what 5 pairs is there
x > 3y since you're looking for naturals
Because I hate writing that stuff on 2 pages, its dull. I want another solution up to 20 pages but interesting

oh, than it would be 2
8 2 and 16 1
Could we do better?
Only one pair?
Isn't the equation you gave here 2x²-5xy-3y²=16 is an equation of a hyperbola
It is indeed
But I dont know how to do canon version
Lemme try it up if I can solve it
Its also rotated about 30 degrees
thanks a lot
thanks to you too
How about plotting the hyperbola on desmos
If you don't wanna solve using trial and error
I did that on random site already
But how do I say it in hw
like "Hi teacher I used desmos so I could solve this easier the answer is 7 2"
Not sure if we can use Newton Raphson here 💀
😂😂
(2x+y)(x-3y)=16
x > 3y for x and y to be natural numbers
yeah
If both (2x+y) and (x-3y) are giving 16 as a product
but then it would be two cases
Then it must imply that both are the factors of 16
which isnt bad actually
Factors of 16 = 1,2,4,8,16
but can I get only one?
You've to make the pairs out of these 5 factors of 16 and check them up for both of those terms in product
I don't think there's a way other than this
And if there is, am sorry, am not aware about it
no way
okay, thanks a lot
Oh wait i got something, we can use the relation x > 3y, which can actually eliminate many of the pairs from the total ones
it would left 8 2 and 16 1
yeah
Thanks again
(8,2) doesn't leads to any solution ig
so answer would be 7 and 2
Neither does (16,1) just checked it up edit: it does
no wait
Wait
16 and 1
2x + y = 16 and x - 3y = 1
— 2(1+3y)+y = 16
— 2+7y=16
— 7y=14
— y=2
And x = 7
I messed it up here
@bleak quail
Yeah
Huge thanks
Welcome man. Best of luck 😁
.close
Closed by @bleak quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, if f is a complex function $\mathbb{R}-differentiable$ at a, which means $$\exists L: \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$$ such that f(a+z) - f(a) - L(z) = o(z) and L is $\mathbb{R}-lineair$; then what is the confition on L for f to be holomorphic at a?
lilisworld.
yo what even is this please explain
If you don't know don't spam their help channel
do you know how to do this? just in case
soooooo
holomorphic at a i think i need to find the derivative at least
$\lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(a+z)-f(a)-L(z)}{z} = 0$
lilisworld.
since $\lim_{z \to 0} \frac{o(z)}{z} = 0$
lilisworld.
yo accept my request
@west basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @west basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm used to conic equations like X^2/a^2 - y^2/b^2 = 1
I ran into an equation where x is greater than one: y^2/1 - 4x^2/1 = 1
what do I do from here? How do I simplify 4x and keep 1?? (This is a hyperbolas equation)
$4 = \frac{1}{\tfrac{1}{4}}$
riemann
@bleak basalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bleak basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
n vectors that span an n−dimensional vector space V are linearly independent.
True/False
which do you think it is?
Take n = 3 and try to understand.
@tepid junco Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tepid junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help understanding these two questions
the first image is question 13 to add clarification
second image is question 5
when doing question 5 i kept getting the answer 144 but the website says its wrong
Can you try putting 288 ?
288 is correct
The code format will be {letter}xxxxxxxx{letter}
for question 13?
This.....
Did you understand your mistake in question 5 ?
You need help in the a part right ?
yes
B is
67,600,000,000
And C is
42,000,000,000
i just dont know A
if that makes any sense
@vernal wraith ?
Sorry, got involved in another question
its alright
Can you check if 1,17,93,60,000 is the answer ?
its wrong
Okay. This is interesting.
Check 39,31,20,000 once. @terse haven
i think i only got it wrong because of the "," placement
Close this one then, if you're done.
Closed by @terse haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
ok so I got the answers for B and C
for "A" I clicked the "Watch It" and got 28,304,640,000, but got it wrong somehow
@vernal wraith if youre still available, any idea?
You put this value in the question and it still gave as incorrect ?
yes
Probably the software is creating some issue then 😂
But I think this is still correct.
this is what the video showed:
this is a dif question
im on question 14 now
Oh man, should've told me that. Send the question no.
its right here
The serial number on a new twenty-dollar bill consists of two letters followed by seven digits and then a letter. How many different serial numbers are possible, given the following conditions?
(a) Letters and digits cannot be repeated.
Yeah this is the logic to that question. Just remove the 3 in it. You'll get the right answer.
wdym by Just The 3 In IT
I meant divide this answer by 3. That should be correct.
how do i make that tiny 10 in text form
ok is the answer 9,434,880,000?
yep it is
alright
.close
Closed by @terse haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
consolidating my attempt at an analysis problem here:
@worthy sky Has your question been resolved?
We need to show we can find an $m$ such that $L < m \leq K$, $\frac{m-1}{n} \leq \frac{L}{n}$, and $\frac{m}{n} \geq \frac{K}{n}$. But since $n$ is a positive integer, the latter 2 only hold when $m - 1 \leq L$ and $m \geq K$. And we have the conditions that $m \geq K$, and $m \leq K$, implying $m = K$, which then also implies $m = K = L + 1$. Is any observation up to this point wrong?
Then the exercise says to prove by induction/contradiction. So we can have $m = K = L + 1$ as our base case, and suppose by induction that there exists an $m$ meeting all our criteria, but that $m + 1$ does not.
Sidebar: I'm not very confident about this step at all, and it all feels very weird to me. I wouldn't think of solving this by induction (not that I see another way, I'd just be incredibly stuck without a hint).
So we have $\frac{m - 1}{n}$ which is not an upper bound of $E$ and $\frac{m}{n}$ which is an upper bound of $E$. We're assuming our hypothesis fails for $m + 1$, so this means either $\frac{m + 1}{n}$ is not an upper bound, or $\frac{m + 1 - 1}{n} = \frac{m}{n}$ is an upper bound. But $\frac{m}{n}$ is an upper bound by hypothesis, and we have a contradiction.
nchoosek
@worthy sky Has your question been resolved?
@worthy sky Has your question been resolved?
Once again, the reasoning that you need to find m - 1 ≤ L and m ≥ K is faulty
While this would be sufficient, it is not necessary, but it seems like you are inducting on the distance between L and K, so it may potentially work
wait I thought you said it was fine 😭
I said it was true that it would be sufficient, but its clearly not necessary
after your explanation I see now
Not in those terms, but that was my intent.
in the other chat
The solution or why we dont need m - 1 ≤ L, m ≥ K?
well I think I understand the solution you wrote, and then that explains why we dont need m - 1 ≤ L, m ≥ K?. If I did get it, what you're saying is since K/n is an upper bound but L/n is not, and they're integers, there is a finite distance between them and we can set k = m and keep decrementing until we hit an m such that m - 1 = L
but wait no
im still confusing myself
this doesn't guaruantee that m is an upper bound
I guess we're not finding m we're just proving it exists
This is the idea, though, as far as I can see. You let n ≥ 1 and let K/n an upper bound and L/n not an upper bound. If you suppose for contradiction that there are no integers m such that m/n is an upper bound and (m - 1)/n a lower bound, then K/n being an upper bound implies that (K - 1)/n must also be an upper bound and so on. But then eventually L/n must be an upper bound, by induction.
So yes, you are not explicity finding m here, you are just relying that if m did not exist, either E is empty or has no upper bound in the integers.
See intuitively that all makes sense, but I don't know the machinery
I've written maybe one inductive proof and that was the basic base case and m + 1 etc
but never a contradictory one and I didn't know you can just write things the way you did and have it be valid
I think you are thinking too much about how the contradiction and induction parts of the proof interact, but they don't actually do that much. You start by assuming a contradiction, then use that assumption to build an induction argument: explicitly, you are arguing that (K - j)/n is an upper bound for E for each j ≥ 1.
"K/n being an upper bound" th is is your base case?
The base case is (K - 1)/n, and this is true because if (K - 1)/n were not an upper bound for E, K would be an integer satisfying K/n an upper bound and (K - 1)/n not an upper bound, but we assumed such an integer did not exist for contradiction.
This is true by assumption, so you could also treat it as your base case.
It might actually be better because it cuts down on the amount of explanation you have to do
this was massively helpful, the idea itself is so simple I can't believe I was stuck on it for 2 days
btw with the rest of the proof I wrote, taking m = K = L + 1 as a base case and continuing, is just that part of taking m = K = L + 1 as a base case for induction valid?
A priori, I don't think there is anything necessarily wrong with it, but I don't see how you would apply induction here. Also, at least in writing, you should really be inducting on K - L there.
I didn't even consider that
I see it though, because then that really is the base case
of distance between them being 1
and then we increment
Right, that would be the idea behind approaching it that way.
how is the rest of what I wrote? because if $m = K = L + 1$ is a valid base case the rest seems fine... But tbh I think the rest of the proof makes $m = K = L + 1$ not a valid base case
nchoosek
idk
It seems to me that it doesn't work, because the m that you are choosing is directly tied to the thing that you are inducting over
That is, by hypothesis, if K - L = j, then m/n is an upper bound for E and (m - 1)/n is not.
But when looking at K - L = j + 1, how do I change my m so it works?
I might just be being dumb but I actually don't see a way to find an m here without inducting on m again, even after inducting on K - L, so we don't need to induct on K - L
Its not dumb, necessarily, I just can't see a good way to make the argument work.
ok well I'm glad I didn't miss anything simple lol
recursion/induction it is
thanks again dude
yeah no problem
.close
Closed by @worthy sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wraith hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @leaden light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if u hv a parabola with equation y=1/3(x-1)^2+5/3 is the vertex still (1, 5/3)
ya
Closed by @versed crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I find the area under the curve for y = 1/x^2 and under y = 3x + 5
could you integrate under the curve?
Uh idk how
Smth like this I'm curious about
As you can see, y = 1/x^2 converges
You can't rly integrate that for the area
Also this isn't "between" curves
It's just under a line
I'm mainly just curious
can u split it into 3 different integrals
I just started integrals
Can u?
I just wanna know if it's possible to find the area lol
yea i think u can
Well like with calculus not a software
can u use a calculator?
Ye sure
I'll not being tested on this
I'm not even learning it in class
I just randomly thought of this and was curious abt it
ok
so its -2 to 1?
It only can do in between curves
Yeah
let me try
ill just use urs
Kk
Yeah that's why I figured lol
I just made it up
Like y = x doesn't work cause it's not under the curve edit nvm it does lol
That seems good
k
Oh qait I'm stupud
Just integrate
Find area under curve from -2 to the intersection
Then use triangles and rectangles to find the exact area in between
@calm jungle lmfao
Easy
ill send u what i did
😂
Kk
,rotate
yea
Nice
Can u do it with like let's say I changed the linear function to idk y = -x^2 + 3
Oh cool
just split it up and then integrate under each ufnctino
np
@glossy gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@vast valley Has your question been resolved?
@vast valley Has your question been resolved?
@vast valley Has your question been resolved?
is this a test
No it's hw
r u asking for question 1a or
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
An oil spill in the shape of a circle is expanding on the surface of a pond. The radius of the oil spill is r (measured in cm ) and the area of the oil spill is A (measured in cm^2 ). Suppose that at a certain time, the area of the spill is 30cm^2 , and the radius of the spill is increasing at 0.2 cm per second .
would r be 3.09 at the certain time?
is this from thomas' calculus?
whats tht
oh
,calc (30/pi)^0.5
Result:
3.0901936161855
Tjanks
@ancient edge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ancient edge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi ! Could someone kindly help with summing these two up? I am up till here now.
I am at this step now.
1/(2n+3) (8n^3+60n^2+142n+105-30n(-1)^n+45(-1)^n /(2n+5)(2n+7)
I’m trying to get to this
Can someone please help? I have been trying and have been stuck for two days now
you can start by excluding 2n+3 from both terms
and then getting the common denominator: (2n+5)*(2n+7)
@granite zealot
Hello!
Yes I have done that now..not sure if correct
I am at this step now.
1/(2n+3) (8n^3+60n^2+142n+105-30n(-1)^n+45(-1)^n /(2n+5)(2n+7)
^like this?
hm would you mind if I instead send the latex version of the steps and you compare them with yours
might be easier than if I untangle it from text :D
Yeah sure…idk what’s latex but okay
Anything to help solve as I’m stuck for way too long
just fancy math text
so after factoring out
then you prob expanded:
brought together
and then multiplied out (will take a sec):
then summing up and I should be where you area
@granite zealot yop looks good
and now polynomial division
so the numerator div by 2n+3
Polynomial division? How can 8n^3 be divided by 2n+3?
yes are you not yet familiar with long polynomial division?
it essentially allows you to divide any polynomials with each other :)
we can start by ignoring the latter two terms at first:
this is what we want to calculate
are thee there?
Yeap! This is my second time hearing of long polynomial division
np, we'll go through step by step
Thank you! I was just really confused with how to resolve this
the principle is to always take the divisor and multiply it by a factor so that the largest powers and their coefficients match
what do I mean by match? the largest term in the numerator is 8n³
and the largest term in the denominator is 2n
so we can multiply our divisor by 4n²
since 2n * 4n² = 8n³
so now we found the factor we need to match the largest terms: 4n²
we'll now subtract 4n² * denominator from the numerator
so 4n² * (2n+3) = 8n³+12n²
we'll subtract that from the numerator and we get:
and we'll write down 4n² on the side
in the end we'll need all the factors we used
now the same principle again
largest term in the numerator is 48n²
and 2n * 24n = 48n²
so our next factor is 24n
24n * divisor = 24n * (2n+3) = 48n²+72n
we'll subtract that from the numerator again
and we'll note down 24n.
one more time: largest power in the numerator is 70n
2n * 35 = 70n
so we'll subtract once more and we get:
0!
and lastly we look at the factors we used throughout the division: 4n², 24n and 35
the remainder of the division thereby is 4n²+24n+35 🦇
@granite zealot hope the process is somewhat clear :)
The remainder becomes the numerator?
yup!
Is long polynomial division legit?
sure
I'll write down the remaining steps:
so now we're at
since we've ignored the last two terms in the division, we still need to divide by them
luckily, we can quickly see that we can easily factor out 2n+3 from 30n(-1)^n+45(-1)^n
btw polynomial division would still work here (the factor would be 15(-1)^n)
meaning our only remainder is 15(-1)^n!
🐛
What do you mean by we can easily factor out?
I'd have argued that one can see that the upper numerator is a multiple of (2n+3) and 15(-1)^n
but if you prefer, you can do a second long division as well, it'd be just one iteration and gives the same result 👍
Would it be possible? I gotten 30n+45 after multiplying by 15 to match the highest numerator but there’s a problem. 30n(-1)^n
How can I minus 30n with 30n(-1)^n
well let's look at it:
do the highest term above is 30n(-1)^n
and the highest term below is 2n
(-1)^n is so annoying
yea, our factor needs to include it
2n * 15(-1)^n = 30n(-1)^n
now the biggest terms match :)
and after subtracting you'll see that nothing remains
so 15(-1)^n is our remainder
which is the desired result, wehee!
Is long polynomial division a thing?
absolutely
as you've just seen it's super useful
It just seems like an out of the blue technique
Does it violate any laws? Are the equations still equal?
I see..maybe I will read a proof on it! Can I ask one more question?
You’re really good at this
a bit like trying to brew the numerator using the denominator 🫧
sure
kk
do you happen to know a few basics of coding?
it's fine if not, I'd just explain it differently
How did they go from the left to the results on the right? I’m curious on this
My question doesn’t involve having to solve this aspect but it annoys me that I can’t figure it out
Hmmm..I think I know abit of basics of Python..not sure if it is enough
um they defined the numerator and upper bound both as n...
Did they use a sigma notation formula?
which you aren't allowed to do
sigma notation is just another way to express any sum
e.g. here
I define a sum
and a new variable x, which is meant to be natural
and I iterate from x=0 to x=5
Wait why? I always struggle when there’s a letter on top
and in each iteration I add the content of the sum
well the sum n: 1 -> n is undefined
I tried plugging in a number on Both side and they add up. That’s why I’m surprised and want to know how they did it
since n is not yet defined
It seemed legit
look you can say f.i. n=1 to 10
LHS=RHS
then n iterates from 1 to 10
or you can for instance say n=1 to x if x was previously defined
but n=1 to n is just senseless?
it's like n=n to n
where does it start? where does it end?
undefined
Wait so what’s up with the RHS? How did they come up with it?
I get what you are trying to say
well if the sum notation on the left would be correct
then I could say what they used
but since the sum doesn't make sense the equation is useless
Is this some higher level math they used?
I can't tell if I don't know what they meant to write into the sum :D
it's like asking me "why does the LHS equal 3?"
Ahhh ok..they just wrote this down and wanted a proof via induction so I’m also not sure what else to add
Hahahaha
Right
I thought I was dumb for not being able to figure it out
yea maybe they meant to write from n=1 to infinity
then induction would make sense
Ahhh..right right..
nw, always view sums as:
Can I also ask another question?😂
For only the left hand side, why is it when I restricted it with the inequality 0< left hand side in the pic< 1, the number is even?
you mean why n must be even if 0<LHS<1 is given?
Yes!!
because for odd n, the term (-1)^(n+1) is negative
That’s right!