#help-38
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
I think I know what it means by what congruence statement but I’m not sure how to do that at all
Nvm I got it
.close
Closed by @dawn trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with some math homework
Can someone help me with my math homework? Does that work with the just ask thing?
what we're asking is to post the problem and state what you're having issues with
please
It goes from -5 to -4 so not linear if that’s the question
@halcyon beacon Has your question been resolved?
Oh I thought there was more to it lol
Closed by @halcyon beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this question?
which part?
erm the whole thing
okay
let's say you clip the 4th and 5th columns off A and row-reduce the rest
i.e. [a_1, a_2, a_3]
what will you get?
identity matrix
okai
oh wait
OH
okay lemme write the answers down
then ill sen dhere to calrify
like this?
yup
ah okay
then the basis for the row sapce would be the first rows
first three*
then column space would be the first three columns
actually how would I get the column space?
i thought i need the original matrix for that
sure you do
well, you have all the info you need actually
{a1, a2, a3} is LI in R^3
hmm since theyre LI, can i use the RREFed form of those vectors?
like the {1,0,0}, {0,1,0}, {0,0,1}
ah wait
you are conflating a vector space with its basis...
whats conflating
Mixing one up with the other
Umm where
Where is that happening lol
No clue, i don’t know this stuff too well sorry, I was just saying was conflating meant lol
I actually just had my test on vector spaces, lin independence, basis, and that stuff today
But that’s beside the point
Yep
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
hi
you need to write span
span{{1, 0, 0, 1, 0}, ...}
otherwise youve just got a basis
Bruh i ended up taking
35 mins
Ok i think i gtg
LOL
Later yes @pseudo wasp
@amber python
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
Can somebody help me with probability I am struggling
what is it?
ok what did you try?
I tried doing the tree diagram but I suck at it
Do u know
I'm not the best at probability but I'm fairly certain you can just do q6 by multiplying fractions
So for example in i), with replacement the pr of two red balls would be 7/13 x 7/13
And without 7/13 x 6/12 without replacement
For part three just multiply the probability of getting a black first, then a white with the probability of getting a white first, then a black
And part five, it'd be subtract the probability of pulling no white balls from 1
Thx
Than answer is correct tysm
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
hi
but i thought they are asking me to find the basis?
.close
Closed by @pseudo wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Determine the domain of analyticity for f(z) = Log(−2+i−z).
Closed by @untold sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does one answer this?
so its 52.4 + 0.06991 repeating
just find 0.06991 repeating as a fraction
and then add on 52.4
@brittle blade
@brittle blade Has your question been resolved?
how do i find this?
do you know how to find like 0.01 repeating as a fraction or
any repeating decimal ?
its same concept
i dont recall
urm so
set x = the decimal
so like
x = 0.99999999999999999
10x = 9.999999999
9x = 9
because the .99 repeating cancel each other out
9x = 9
x = 9/9
that might be a bit confusing because 0.9 repeating is equal to 1 lol lemme do a different one
x = 0.0111111111
10x = 0.1111111111111
9x = 0.1
0.1/9 = x
or 10/90 = x
so basically ur setting 0.06991 to x
and then finding like 10000x or whatever and subtracting
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone tell me how why does this question i) use the normal dist for multiple samples?
If i were to see it by itself, i would think that its using the normal normal distribution
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
there are 4 samples
4 is considered "multiple"
but i remember doing something like:
the sum of 4 pens is taken from bla bla, what is the probability rhat the total weight > 40
and i did somehting like
Let X_2 be the new random variable bla bla
~N(4 * mean, 4^2 * s,d,)
whats the difference?
how do sum and mean relate to each other?
@pseudo wasp Has your question been resolved?
Oh wait
Nvm i see it now
Thanks
.close
Closed by @pseudo wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is this wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
@dense hazel Has your question been resolved?
@dense hazel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I only dont understand the part circled in red. What definition is it? If they mean the sin(theta)=s/l I understand it. However theta is written without the sin. So i am confused. Elaboration will be apreciated!
sine refers to triangles (mostly), this definition is the arc length formula s= theta* r… (or in this case r = l
Closed by @dark lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@dusty saffron so, do you understand this then?
It is the same arclength formula
but why does the derrivative of theta, make the outcome of the equation be the velocity
Larry the Cucumber
the length l will always remain a constant (assuming the string never is a ridgid object), so we can say that’s a constant
however, the angle theta will change as time goes on so we define both the arc legnth and theta as functions of time
Larry the Cucumber
then if you differentiate that quantity you will get the result from above
wait i understand everything youre saying but I dont have to differentiate this last one right?
We differentiate theta(t)
and thats our velocity
and then we can put that Theta(t)' into the arc length formula
remember that velocity refers to a change in some distance, if you differentiate the theta funciton you’ll get the rate that the angle changes not the distance
also
I think you’re saying that you should differentiate just theta(t)?
but you have to differentiate both sides of the equation for it to hold true
yeah I said it a bit wrong
I meant the differentiation of the x and y which are functions of theta
I think you explained it very clear. Thanks a lot!
sounds good! do you still have anything that you’re unsure about?
Closed by @dark lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to graph?
Linear equation
I'm trying to convert this into y=mx+b but failing to
What’s your y in this case?
Im doing t for y
Then t=-s+10 is what you want
I graphed and I got (6.5,3.5)
Ah yeah that’s right
I didn’t see the first eq
I don’t know why you’re tryna graph them
Just solve them simultaneously
I have to graph this system, teacher said so 😣
@pearl wren Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pearl wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I find the equation?
What’s Y for red?
Anyone help me?
I am trying to find the equation for Y and first one is green then red
.close
Closed by @grave spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HWLP
<@&286206848099549185>
what don't you understand?
first, you want to simplify both numerator and denominator
do you know what tan(360 - x) can be converted to?
yeah but we can simplify it further
How so
tan(2pi - x) = -tanx
there's also a formula for that. find it out
Closed by @gusty pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is 7^6 wrong? How does the 7^6 become negative so that it gets placed in a fraction?
@glacial pike Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Read the explanation. "Negative exponent rule"
I did but I didn’t fully understand it
So if the exponent is negative, you can remove the negative by just putting everything in the denominator with 1 in numerator.
a^-n -> 1/a^n
Yeah but I though I could bring 7^-4 underneath the fraction and combine it 7^9 and then subtract 7^3
If you get what I mean
You are subtracting 7^3 - 7^9 = ?. Not the other way around. This creates a negative exponent of 7^-6 and using the "negative exponent rule" remove the negative from -6 and put the 7^6 in the denominator with 1 in the numerator which brings 1/7^6
I think I understand now I see umm
I think
So what is 7^3 - 7^9?
-7^6 and then I have to fraction it right???
Oh yes yes woops
Totally fine. And then you get 7^-6 which you use the exponent rule.
Okay I think I get it Thank you so much!! 🙏
Welcomee
Much appreciated!
@glacial pike Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glacial pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this problem?
@steel widget Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @steel widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please help me with c and d? i dont know what i did wrong for c and i don't know what to do for d
can someone please help? thank you
@storm cave Has your question been resolved?
Show your work
so for 3c, given that volume is 4/3πr^3
i multiply 50000 by 3/(4π)
and then cube root
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you mean isomorphism?
homo
if h is a homomorphism then h^-1 doesn't make much sense
inverse homomorphism
are we told h has an inverse?
or does the h^-1 in the first line refer to preimage
because i think it refers to preimage
beat me to it
(what language is that btw)
slovak
no
thought so.
that means $h^{-1}(L)$ is NOT the image of $L$ by $h^{-1}$ as you're treating it.
Ann
yes, reverse
somehow i get the impression that showing you the proof and walking through every step of it will not satisfy you.
i don't know if i should read your question as
Now that you have explained the mistake in my mis-proof of the inclusion h^-1(L1L2) ⊆ h^-1(L1)h^-1(L2), I am adamant that the same reasoning can be applied to a seemingly legitimate proof of the REVERSE inclusion. Explain to me why I am wrong.
or as
I am now confused as to why the same argument does not work to brand a proof of the reverse inclusion as faulty.
Second one I would say
But if it's easier I can watch some videos on this topic
Probably i wont find something related to formal languages
Maybe sets in general can be enough though
@mint peak Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mint peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is this wrong someone please help
Uhh I can’t voice call oof
Could u just write it?
Well then, ig not
<@&286206848099549185>
@dense hazel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@dense hazel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dense hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$x_1 ,x_2 , x_3 ,x_4$ are the roots of the polynomic eq find x_1^2 +x_2^2+x_3^2+x_4^2
『Marius』
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
<@&286206848099549185>
How'd you find a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 if you knew a+b+c+d, abcd, ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd, abc+abd+acd+bcd. That's all I can think from relationship between roots and coefficient of a biquadratic polynomial..sorry for typing for long time..
does a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2 even have some kind of formula can t even find it on google
I'd place my bet on (a+b+c+d)^2 formula but that seems out of place
Or something like integration as that would make square from linear function but I don't know how d we bring calculus here
the (a+b+c+d)^2 might work
Yep might work
yeah in the formula there are the a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2 and 2ab + 2ac + 2ad +2bc +2bd+2cd and factoring 2 from that we end up with a formula that can be used
Yes
Closed by @fallow spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello everyone, I'm having trouble with a calculus problem. I need to find the derivative of a function. y = sqrt(11x+sqrt(11x+sqrt(11x)))
I am using the chain rule, but cannot find the combination of f(g(h(x))) (or longer) that is correct.
obviously, the first one would be something like
f(x) = sqrt(x) or f(x) = sqrt(11x+x)
but every time I try to make it deeper it doesn't work
if its f(x) = sqrt(x) then g(x) = 11x+sqrt(11x+sqrt(11x))
which is correct, but still can't differentiate that.
if I make h(x) anything then it doesn't work
if f(x) = sqrt(x), then g(x) can be something like 11x + sqrt(x)
which so far would give y = sqrt(11x+sqrt(11x)
but then you can't go farther
idk what to do
I can solve it once I find what each chained function is
you need way more functions
yeah i figured
use f_1, f_2, f_3, ...
this other problem im working on has 6
but it was a lot easier since it was all trig functions
yeah it would have to be that
then f_2(x) would be sqrt(x) probably
but now what would f_3(x) be
not 11x+x
my brain
thx for the help btw @zinc ginkgo
this one here is similar in that I got no clue how to separate these things
here's another one
since these are popping up then there must be some way to change it so that we only substitute certain parts?
on the last one, if the outermost one were x*sqrt(x) then obviously that wouldn't work
but if we said it was x*sqrt(a) then we can make the next lower one f_n(a) = something
are you allowed to just do that? my textbook made no mention of it
ironically, this homework assignment has video examples to help me out, yet not a single one of these seemingly unseparable equations have one :/
on second thought the last one uses the product rule
@pseudo mantle Has your question been resolved?
ill figure it out eventually
which one you need help?
@pseudo mantle Has your question been resolved?
the very first one at the beginning of my help post
basically, i don't know how to break the equation down
@pseudo mantle Has your question been resolved?
hm
yea that’s ez
all good
hey if im reading this correctly @jagged chasm it's this?
\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{121x}{8}\left(11x+\sqrt{11x+\sqrt{11x}}\right)\left(11x+\sqrt{11x}\right)\right)^3}}
wait hold on that didnt work at all
no it accepts un-simplified answers
i havent even submitted that response yet
but graphing calculator says no
oh i see
well anyways my dad is home currently and hes an engineer so ill go ask him
i’m wondering where i went wrong
i think everything is correct
up until
i try to mush the chain rule togeyher
graphed, it gives results that are very close to zero at all times
ah i see where i went wrong
it was the chain rule axtually
ok
one more time
this is good this is correct i think
now we must simplify ourselves into hell
😊
i will leave that to you
have fun
@pseudo mantle Has your question been resolved?
@jagged chasm My dad any I tried to solve this problem for like an hour at least and we couldn't do it, also your answer doesn't look correct still. He's taken calc III and even he's stumped. I have no idea what kind of torture problem this is but it's weird
Mine is right it’s just not simplified
I can simplify it a bit more
graph checks out too
Yep
My answer should be good
@pseudo mantle
yeah, that worked. It's interesting that simplifying made it work
thanks for the help
".close" when done btw
@pseudo mantle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to write this in the shortest possible form
And i have the answer but i don’t know how they came to that conclusion
Its about question 10 a
just keep applying these laws until you get a simple surd
they first expand the bracket
and then just keep applying the laws
its right there
surds are numbers in the form of
$\surd{b}$
i dont know the latex for this one oops
moik
ok anyway, its just a list of facts when youre dealing with roots
it is always true
its like $aa = a^2$,
that is a fact just like \surd{b} * \surd{a} = \surd{{ab}}$
moik
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
ok i really suck at latex but you get the idea right
Yeah i get it thanks!
try learn that law of surds sheet
Yeah i’ll just learn it through that
yeah as you're doing through ur questions, have a check back and see if you can apply any laws
eventually try do it without the sheet to remember it
good work!
Closed by @devout rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the thought process behind discriminant =0?
A tangent line only intersects a curve once
If it was greater than 0 it'll become a secant line
But this is a tangent at one point, which does intersect the curve again
Locally
Intersects once locally
So concavity
Once it changes concavity it may intersect the function more than once
Ive not studied concavity yet, so im not sure what you mean
Concave down, concave up
The pink is what we call an "inflection point"
Where the function will change concavity
A tangent line is tangent to a curve locally, is its formal meaning
Meaning a region of similar concavity
And does the curve y=c/(x+1) have any inflection points?
It is
I mean
Not really
No
The second derivative never equals 0 so there's no inflection points
It does change concavity because it's asymptotic to x=-1 and the denominator's leading term is x with an odd power
@frosty anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frosty anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need a hint for this problem
kawaii_pear
It's a weird problem it's okay
ok sure sorry
<@&286206848099549185>
@drifting crow Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @drifting crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$$y'''-11y''+30y'=40e^x$$
2003 Honda Accord
I can't seem to to find a good guess for the particular solution.
I am aware of superposition in differential equations, but all of the guesses I've tried always seem to end up being the same as the homogenous solutions or fundamental solutions.
I have tried $$y_p=(Ax+B)e^x$$ and other relevant forms.
2003 Honda Accord
did you try y_p = Aexp(x) ?
Wouldn't that end up being the same as the homogenous solution such that the particular is "absorbed"? I found the homogenous solution to be
$$y_c = c_1 + c_2e^5t + c_3e^6t$$
2003 Honda Accord
Oh wait, I just realized they are raised to different exponents and so are not the same
hmm let see
Ae^x -11Ae^x +30Ae^x = 40e^x
(20A)e^x = 40e^x
A = 2
Closed by @final nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive proven it is increasing but how do i prove it is bounded above?
Wuh
How would one easily turn that into a continuous function...
Like there is a much easier way to do that
The question was how to prove it's bounded
That is to say, that it has a limit
right so assume its bounded by assumption, then find that supremum?
Isn't trying to solve for the limit without proving it exists first how you get the -1/12 thing
- that's series using riemann rearrangement theorem
- in this question you need to get an estimate of an upper bound
- Once you have the estimate you don't use the fact it converges in your proof
The initial question was how to prove it's bounded above
Nothing you've said helps with that
yh true that proves that if its bounded then it converges
So as for proving it's bounded above
i need to somehow show that each consecutive phi is increasing smaller and smaller?
or whatever that symbol is
how would one get to that
Well in this case I wouldn't do that directly
Just look at the rule for getting each phi_i
You're adding two things, can you bound both of them above?
One of the things is just 1 which is trivially bounded above by 1
(that's a confusing way to put it)
So can you bound $\frac{\phi_i}{1+\phi_i}$ above by something?
Texit hello
$\frac{\phi_i}{1+\phi_i}$
its less than 1?
Yup
Gamma is an Algebraic Number
So each phi_i is the sum of 1 and something less than 1
Right
@dense scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dense scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
connect A and B by a segment, and use that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180°
can u send the sol
so you want the solution, not help
yup
c)
This isn’t the right place for u then
first find angle bca, then use sum of all the angles of quadrilateral is 360
You will get your answer
ok
oki thanks
thank you so much
.close
Closed by @fading ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
All organisms contain C-14. When the organism dies, the amount of C-14 begins to decrease with a half-life of 5740 years. The remaining amount of C-14 as a percentage of the amount of C-14 at the time of death can be described by an exponential function, f(x)=b·a^x , where x denotes the number of years after the time of death of the organism.
a) Determine a. 5740=log(1/2)/log(a ) a=1/2^(1/5740) ≈0.9998792 (solved)
b) Write down the calculation formula. We are informed that in some dead organic matter the remaining percentage of C-14 has been measured at 90%.
c) Now calculate how many years have passed since the time of death
Just substitute the value of a and u get the calculation formula
For c, b.a^x at x=0 is b
At some point of time x, it's 90% of b
So b.a^x=0.9b try solving that
what exactly do you mean by substitute the value of a? as in f(x)=b*0,9998792^x?
That kinda seems vague, calculation formula to calculate what? That's the formula to calculate the amount after x years, yes
@true fjord Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @true fjord
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do u do 11
@analog sequoia Has your question been resolved?
A parabola?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@analog sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given this f:
How do I apply the chain rule to show the following expression? Mostly, how do I apply the chain rule, I dont see any inner functions
@stoic robin Has your question been resolved?
I have tried this:
t must then be = 1 for it to work out, but why?
<@&286206848099549185>
@stoic robin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stoic robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find W(i) and then find all the roots of polynominal. Complex numbers. I don't know what to start with
hint:
2z^2 = z^2 + z^2
Tbh it tells me nothing. It's my first time doing smh like this with W(Z) and W(i)
$$W(z)=z^4-z^3+z^2+z^2-z+1=$$
$$=z^2(z^2-z+1)+(z^2-z+1)$$
Modus
= ...
Can i assume that w(z) = 0 ?
Closed by @river badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whenever this happens, do i convert the other side to +- and remove the absolute value?
Do you want to solve for x?
yeah
yes, then you get 2 equations, x + 1 = 3 and x + 1 = -3
the absolute value is just x+1 since it's the distance between. If X is a negative number then say -3 it's absolute value is 3
I think
or x + 1 = 3 and -(x + 1) = 3 which is the same
how do i know that without memorizing it?
yes
it's just a property of absolute values
right now i just memorized that whenever theres an abs value i convert the other side to +-
after simplify ofc
the absolute value of a number is just its additive inverse basically I believe
that works, but how would you solve |x| + 2x = 3?
no, additive inverse 3 would be - 3 and |3| = 3
@merry bluff sorry I misworded my statement then
the trick is not to replace the other side with +- 3, but replace the |x| with +-x, or in general the thing between | |
Also consider that the absolute value is the numbers distance from 0
well the absolute value of X is just X
just consider it as 2 cases, one where x is negative and one where x is positive
it can't be negative
if x is negative it will be the positive opposite of X. If it's positive, it's just X.
because it's the absolute value of the number
or just the distance the number is from 0
so for Jelle's example |x| + 2x = 3 cookie what is X
|x| + 2x = x + 2x = 3x=3= 3/3=X = X=1
sorry I don't know how to use the math function to display it properly.
I could write it out and SS if that is confusing
sure
it's not saying x is = + or - X. An equation is stating equality between both expressions. So 3 must be equal to the expression on the left hand side. All that absolute value symbol is telling you is that even if that term was a negative number, it's absolute value must be positive. So in either case it's going to be positive X.
Does that make sense?
yeah
or if x is negative then -x + 2x = 3 => x = 3 but 3 is not negative so the only solution is x = 1
OHHHHH
so u basically just remember if x is negative or positive
so the cake is a lie
.close
Closed by @alpine fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this statement true or false ?
M = {{0, 1}} is relation over {0, 1}
Please explain the solution because I want to comprehend the solution.
And maybe 2 thoughts from me about it:
- {0, 1} is one set, but don't we need 2 sets to create a relation ?
- Shouldn't a relation be a tuple and consist of ( ) brackets instead of {} ?
<@&286206848099549185>
M is a unary relation over {0, 1}
not binary
In general, an n-ary relation over the sets A_1, ..., A_n is a subset of the Cartesian product A_1 x ... x A_n.
@wheat violet Has your question been resolved?
Thanks. So in this case I would need to multiply {0, 1} with itself ? {0, 1} x {0, 1} = {0, 0, 0, 1 } ?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
And the answer to the question would be True, right ?
If the question is talking about a unary relation, then yes.
@wheat violet Has your question been resolved?
Ok. Thanks
Closed by @wheat violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. Could you help me, what answer is the right one? Thank you.
// Find the Domain//
@orchid sonnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @orchid sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can ik the compound intrest fomrula?
formula
surely this is the kind of thing that you can (and should) Google by yourself?
I see one answer on google
Closed by @cunning belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i do this
substitute p and q
p=3-2root(2) ; q=2-root(2)
Yeah
solve it then rationalize the denomiator . try to remove the root sign
Ok
How do I solve
show me how far you got
did you substitute p=3-2√ (2) ; q=2-√ (2) in (p+q/p-q)? what did u get?
Replace what you get
Then complete the sums and substractions
And then multiply by the reciprocal of the denominator
To ratiionalize
So numerator times denominator
(5-3sqrt(2)) multiplied by 1-sqrt(2)
Look
When you multiply the denominator
That's a notable product
a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)
You will get rid of the root
And just multiply normally the numerator with the denominator recyprocal
And you will get your m + n(-/2)
Is . Multiply?
@uneven hatch Has your question been resolved?
So 5sqrt(2) - 6 numerator?
Is m+n(-/2)
And I divide it by -1
So it just inverts the symbols after that
Yes
no?
Yes
@uneven hatch Has your question been resolved?
No, show your work 🤔
you are missing something when multipying (a+b)(c+d)
Was I right
That doesn't mean that the result is 0, it means that the term doesn't change : a x 1 = a
Where
Here, you have 5√2 but not 5
You have omitted the result of the multiplications by 1
Also -3√2
.close
Closed by @uneven hatch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Which graph(s) satisfies the above conditions? I'm not understanding why D is incorrect, given the above conditions I belive the graph must be decreasing and concave up
^^ it is a point of inflection in graph D
@opaque dragon Has your question been resolved?
Oh I see, I'm assuming E satisifies the conditions? It's concave up and decreasing
.close
Closed by @opaque dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Got a question again:
f(P) = g(P-tP)
Task: Differentiate the function above by t and find an expression for dP/dt.
Im a bit confused because I thought that the differentiation by t is the same as dP/dt right?
But then I was wondering whether I need to do something with the function first because the numerator is dP
The solution is very confusing to me aswell, I cant really comprehend it.
I probably misunderstood something fundamentally. Can somebody explain to me how this task is supposed to be solved?
This is implicit differentiation
which means you can take the d/dt of both sides in order to find an expression for dP/dt
"I thought that the differentiation by t is the same as dP/dt right?"
dP/dt is specifically the derivative of P with respect to t
I did that and ended up with f'(P) = g'(P-tP)*(-P)
But that is quite different from the solution. Did I miss a step?
You treated P as a constant, but the question implies that it varies with respect to t
Think of P as a function of t. As if P is short for the function P(t)
ahhh
In fact, go ahead and replace P with P(t) if you'd like
so whenever I have something like dP/dt (contrary to d/dt) I can assume that P can be expressed as a function of t?
Yes.
Because even if you're wrong and P turns out to be constant, then it's still true, you'll just find dP/dt = 0 in that case
👍
so If I differentiate (P-tP) that would be (P(t)-tP) which needs to result in (P'-P) right?
The second P is also a function of t
So you'd need to use the product rule for the -tP
@granite breach Has your question been resolved?
Hm
so I am wondering where those went?
For clarity I'm going to write P(t) for P
$$f(P(t)) = g(P(t)-tP(t))$$
$$\frac{d}{dt} f(P(t)) = \frac{d}{dt}g(P(t)-tP(t))$$
tatpoj
This is basically where we started, right?
yes
On the left we get $f'(P(t))P'(t)$
tatpoj
I can see that
On the right, we get $g'(P(t)-tP(t))\cdot(P'(t) -P(t) - tP'(t))$
tatpoj
👍 no problem
thanks for the thorough explanation
Sure thing
@granite breach Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @granite breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve
???
wdym by "solve"
that's a function
it is telling you what you have to do if you have a certain number you want to evaluate the function with
but that's it
do you have the full screenshot?
i meant solve for derivative sorry
oh...
then I'm out xdn't, sorry
haven't seen calculus yet
or derivatives in general
i just know they exist
consider
$$f(x) = e^{\ln(x^{4x})}$$
ℝamonov
why that
why i used this or why it works
why u used it
its much clearer how to differentiate stuff with a base of e
@alpine fern Has your question been resolved?
what is the theorem?
i remember this
but i dont know the theorem
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I determine if a sequence doesn't have a recursive formula?
is this in general or is it relating to something more specific
If there's a general rule that would be helpful. I am working on a sequence and I found the explicit formula but the recursive formula seems non-existent
The explicit formula is (n+1)/n^2
@runic trail Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @runic trail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh yes i think so
If you wanted to find max value in the graph
It would be at the peak of the graph right
yes
do you know what the gradient (1st derivative) is at the peak?
is this the derivative?
oh ok
sure, 0
yeah
So at the peak of a graph. The gradients always gonna be zero
Thats how you find local maximums and local minimums
To justify if its a local max or a local minimum. You take any two points to the left and right and see if they are postive or negative derivative values
postive -> 0 -> negative = local max
negative -> 0 -> postive = local min
yes that makes sense
b
but
its a property
i dont know hom im supposed to explain it
for the last question?
yes
you would just talk about how the maximum value would be the local max of the graph. Which is when the derivative changes sign and hits zero
is it not a global max here ?
as the values decreases after to inf
could be
I havent checked out the graph
I dont think they mind if you say local max or global max if thats the case
but generally i just say local max.
Closed by @lavish kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A tank has a parallelepiped (or prismatic) shape, whose base is a square of side 15 m and whose height is 16 m, rests on a platform located 2 m above the ground. The tank is filled by pumping water from the ground through a pipe that flows into the bottom of the tank.
Find the depth of water inside the tank (in meters), when work T =γ - 15^2 - 48, where γ = 1000Kgfm3 is the specific gravity of the water. Note. The work T was expressed in the form given to facilitate the calculations to be performed.
I understand the statement like this: (drawing)
Closed by @wind saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that if φ is a normal external measure in X and φ(X) < ∞ then a set B ⊆ X is
φ-measurable if and only if
φ(X) = φ(B) + φ(X\B).
i have proven the first part but i cant do the reverse
@sick stump Has your question been resolved?
might want to post in #advanced-analysis as well
Closed by @sick stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I continue for q11


