#help-36
1 messages · Page 257 of 1
?
4.5
i wouldn't approximate
after i get 4.472135 what do i do
well, that's still approximating
can you find the exact value?
add them now
radical 68 is 8.2462112512
what's the exact value?
that is
well actually
i think sqrt(68) is fine
what about the other distance from O to E?
hollup maybe the a's and b's are frying me
is there an x and y for this
ill search
?
idk where the place the numbers so looking for and x and y version might be easier
ohh
yeah
ok hollon ima get scrap paper
!noai though lol
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
sorry
(-2-4)^2+(4-6) =
radical 40
about 6.3
but my teacher said always keep it in radical
gotchu
J to E?
i think you messed up this
oh i missed a square
okur
i meant 4-6 square so thats -2 * -2 which is 4
the content in 4-6
(||it's not 4||)
Huh
wait what
how'd you get #2?
(6-(-2))^2 + (0-4)^2
everything else seems correct
from one side to antoher side
ok ok lemme redo i think i see it
ah shucks
i got radical 80 this time
nice
which means i prolly gotta switch the values
so which sides are equal?
JE and JO are equal
isoceles?
yes
also, not to be the grammar police, but it's spelled "iso__s__celes"
O thanks i didnt catch that
i dont understand the question
i'm talking about the second one now
that X got bisected aswell
ok
as it turns out,
it's a theorem in geometry that
the perpendicular bisector of AB contains all points C
such that CA = CB
and contains ONLY those points
therefore, C lies on the perpendicular bisector of AB if and only if CA = CB
and we know that JE = JO already
so what can we say about YJ?
(hint: ||two points form a line||)
YJ is a right angle?
what i'm trying to say is
Y and J lie on the perpendicular bisector of OE
and the perpendicular bisector is a line
so YJ must form that line
since two points form a line
so overall, for#2 id say that J and Y line up as a bisector and go trough OE?
yes
J and Y lie on the perp. bisector
and the perp. bisector is a line
so J and Y must form that line
(proof: prove that JO = JE and YO = YE)
SORRY I WAS COOKING SOMETHING
THANK YOUU
if you're done type ".close"
Closed by @mighty grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with the top 1
Just a little hint on what i should do
,rccw
are you able to do any of it, or do you need help on starting?
start of it
i completely forgot anything related to that
Yea there is smth i am diff missing
You know there is a result/formula for displacement in nth second in straight line motion
you may recall deriving it using second equation of motion
very mid handwriting
Blud is still stuck at handwriting
if that is mid then mine in unfathomable
S(4) - S(3) = 26
S(9) - S(8) = 56
$S(t)=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2$
◇♡《pasta》♤♧
Va=Vo+(n-1_2)a
Snth=u+a/2 (2n-1)
sry i am panicking the assignment is due 40 mins
what is u
it's ok 
s is disp
n is the nth second
yea my teach never taught us that lmfao
just apply it two time. You get two equation and two variables
S/t =Va , Va=Vo+(n-1_2)a
then use second equation of motion. like @mental patrol showed
r the only thing i know and idk how to use em
elaborate pls?
I meant input the two set conditions in the result.
ok so
uh first set of condition is Snth=26m and n=4. Put these values in the result and you will get a equation in a and u.
and do the same for second set of conditions. You get another such equation.
what is snth again
Displacement in nth second
yeah so two equations with u and a as variable. Find them. That's what is asked
you forgot u
No. Read the ques properly. obviously at some point the particle started from rest but at t=0 or the time when we started observing the motion, it had attained a velocity which we call its initial velocity
ic
??
did you solve the equations
I did and got the answers as well. so you can too
thank u
I did
On g whzt is this
what about multiple Sec th
this is for 1st quection answer u can do it like this . do u need other answers also
i did in the 2nd question
8th to 10th
so i did
8+9+10/3
×0.5
ah shit - 0.5 mb
right
8.5
Letsgo i got the hang of it
thanks yall
.close
Closed by @hushed basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The problem asks to find length of arc AB if the angle PRB is equal to 46 and S and R are points of tangency
Can anyone help me solve this problem?
okay, whats that?
Circumference inscribed in a circumference
For starters, what arc measures can you determine with angle PRB?
yup!
I'm not sure if it necessarily should or shouldn't be but why do you want to draw that tangent?
Yup
Is there any other way to reach that conclusion
Interesting
Mind showing how?
You label point Q as such
Then QRB = (RP +PB)/2 = minor arc RS
Also since S is tangent you have minor arc RS = angle RSP = (RP + AB)/2
Oops typo
How is the minor arc RS the same as arc RB?
Sorry I mean
Because RS is subtended by tangent line QR and RS
And RB is subtended by tangent line RQ and line RB which is the same as RS
Key is that R is tangent to both circles
Could you keep explain in dms if you don’t mind? I might go offline suddenly
Ok
Power in my house is going out lately
@barren loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @barren loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
plz help with this
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@sullen echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys im so lost on how i can do the rest of the lines to finish up the art
can you guys give me ideass on what kind of functions i can use
heres some of the requirements
You cannot do odd functions, since odd functions have to pass through the origin
1/x doesn't pass through the origin
You have to include asymptotes? That's a wild thing to include
Fair! Mb

You can move the pikachu so that there's lines through the origin
That will make it easier to do some odd functions
I guess it's not a big deal to include asymptotes as long as you're allowed to restrict them
I didn't think of that haha
i see
what's wrong with two metric fucktons of polynomials?
also, the "list of requirements" surely is missing stuff. You cannot be asked for two "horizontal asymptotes" if there's literally zero horizontal lines in the drawing
we had to pick our own image
You can sneak a few in there! You'll just have to restrict them to be very small
yeahh
@spice vine Has your question been resolved?
@spice vine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spice vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can you help me in understanding point c? I don't know what I have to do in this question tbh
I solved a and b, but c is like not clear on what to do
for what values of x is f(x) <= 1
$x >= 4$
JPuXIUim6x
Oh yeah show me latex special language syntax
I mean, appearantly I am wrong, with solving it
its asking <= 1
JPuXIUim6x
yes because... the f(x) or y value is <= 1 there
im not sure how you can flip the sign
refer to the graph
when x <= 4 then f(x) <= 1
It's asking me to solve inequality
uh huh
no you dont
the graph is the proof
you're just writing an observation based on it
solving inequalities is putting it in the form of
"x sign value"
thats all you need to be concerned about for now
So for $f(x) =< 1, x =< 4$?
JPuXIUim6x
i would reverse the order of that statement
??
For $x \leq 4, f(x) \leq 1$
is this domain correct?
Because I solved it, but appearantly my answer sheet says it's not correct
tten ʚɞ
what did you put for domain
$4 \leq x$
JPuXIUim6x
That's what I got
Is it wrong?
Yes
fx will be 1 and smaller
For f(x) smaller or equal to 1, x will be equal to 4 or less
Okay, so why did you write this
Because I solved the inequalty wrong, I flipped the sign when was multiplying
this is correct but as i said it's best to reverse the order (causality)
usually you would say
for x blah blah blah, f(x) blah blah blah
because f(x) depends on x
Makes sense
But for some reason
Those are the answers
Why did they write -2 I have no idea
Asymptote?
well yeah just check the graph
see the graph
3, 2, 1, 0
And 4
Intersection
And till x = -2
Since this moment is asymptote, it will go until infinity
.close
Closed by @raven loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, so im stuck here
wdym?
how about the quadratic formula
you can but you'd end up with quadratic formula, there's no nice factorization
18 doesn't have an x attached to it, that factorization is wrong
oh so how can i like memorize the rule to that? every number must have an x in order to be factorized?
in this case it's more or so you can take x "common" or take it outside of an expression only if it has an x attached to it yeah
also just memorize the quadratic formula if you haven't gone over it, you can find the solution to any quadratic that way
Theres no rule to be memorised. The simple logic is that your factors must multiply together to get the original expression
,tex .quadratic formula
riemann
In this case it simply doesnt
this is probably the one you should memorize
This case
ohhh
okay got it
i memorized that
its just
here, my b is 9c+18 right
b is the coefficient of the x term
your quadratic is
x^2-6x+9c+18
correct?
your 18 does not have an x attached
yed
your 18 is part of the c in the quadratic formula
and my 9c is also the c in the formula right
confusingly, you also have c in your expression, so you probably want to rename something
yep
because writing "c = 9c + 18" is going to be a recipe for misery
hold up ill put it into the formula i know
here
ok so now how will you proceed?
so it says determine the number of points with a horizontal tangent so
maybe like a case differentiation
thingy
for D=0 and stuff?
if D is the thing inside the square root then yes
ohhh
so if D=0 then we have 1 simple point with x=3
otherwise if D>0 then we have 2 points and D<0 then no zeropoint?
yep correct
but do i have to look at how c is specifically in the cases? like c>0 etc
?
yes, translate your three cases (D = 0, D > 0, D < 0) into corresponding statements involving c
shit ok
good handwriting
don’t steal my shtick
what
it was a satirical comment
unsolicited handwriting feedback is a slaylaism. you cannot adopt it
Law, you have great handwriting, don't let her comments get to you, but yeah you can improve
i dont see a trademark sign anywhere
good handwriting :3
🫂
i’m so done
by the power of democracy you lose here
Wonderul handwriting 
people are so mean
you can say they are average
my handwriting sucks ik but
good one aorts
🥁 tss
its the internet, people can be mean with no consequence lol
thank u thank u, i will see myself out
fuck my handwriting i dont need it the results are what matter
my opinion counts more since i am a handwriting authority
i mean, its important its comprehensible no?
but if people can't read it then they can't get a result tho
uh okay?
yes but people can read it
i mean im not sure if its 78 or 18, and is that a c or a u ?
what was the original question again? 💀
okay
so im kind of stuck
18
so if d = 0 then c =-1
but wouldnt that mean we have x 1 and x 2 = 3
???
Well, they must be indeed equal
because we have 3 + , - square root of 0
Yeah this should be something very well known from quadratics
so if d=0 then x1,2 = 3? not just x1=3?
because the quadratic factors as (x-3)(x-3) in that case
so there's information being conveyed by referring to x1,x2
hi guys
so?
but for your purpose, all you care about is that this is the case where there is one solution
hmm
I mean, how would you write the solutions to x² - 4x + 4 = 0??
yeah x1,2 = …
but if i had to sketch the determinant then how do i draw a double zeropoint in a tangent line
damn
since you're doing calculus, i'll mention as a side note that when a polynomial has a "double root" (like x1,x2 = 3) then 3 is a root of both the polynomial and its derivative
there are contexts where that is of interest
oh
hm okay
okay so ive done it like this
basically when d>0 and c<-1 then we have 2 different zeropoints
when c>-1 then none
but im a bit confused
seems ok, what's the confusion?
i would word it slightly differently: instead of "when d > 0 and c < -1" i would say "if c < -1, then d > 0, so there are two solutions"
the way you said it suggests that d and c are independent of each other, but they are not
so is there like a trick for finding out the c<.. part
because
i had to like actually think
and put values into c
bcs i got like 45 minutes for the whole exam
well you can just solve the inequality like this:
D > 0
<==> 9 - (9c + 18) > 0
<==> -9c - 9 > 0
<==> 9c < -9
<==> c < -1
or i could just like think about when a positive number would come out from the stuff inside
yea you can do it that way too
ok nice
or as you said, just plug in a number for c that is greater than -1 and see what you get
also my teacher does some stuff with
]-1 ; infinity
or some stuff
i forgot that notation
yea that's just another way of saying c > -1
yw
@copper roost Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @copper roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So do you know the formula for a weighted average?
Uh no
i need help with something, im new in this server so i dont know if im in the right channel
its math
!help
and about areas
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
So a formula for a weighted average is $\frac{ax + by}{a + b}$ where $x$ and $y$ are the values that you're taking the average of, and $a$ and $b$ are the weights.
OmnipotentEntity
I see
so what we have is $\frac{a \cdot 0.5 + b \cdot 0.25}{a + b} = 0.4$
OmnipotentEntity
now, $a$ and $b$ can be general weights, but we can simplify this by recognizing that we let $a$ and $b$ have the meaning of the volume used.
OmnipotentEntity
So @warped phoenix can you make a second formula which relates only a to b in a different way?
using the idea above?
Hmm lemme see
Read the last line of the original problem
that's OK!
that's the feeling you get when you're learning
in the last sentence of the original problem, how much volume total are you shooting for?
10 liters
ok, so if a is the volume of the 50% concentration acid, and b is the volume of 25% concentration acid, then 10 liters represents what combination of a and b?
a + b = 10
Yess i can do this by my self now i think
x = 6, y = 4?
I use x and y for simplicity
a = 6, y = 4
Uh do i close
.close
Closed by @warped phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
This is correct.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{n}f(n)^k = \frac{1}{1-\lim_{n\to\infty} f(n)}$
Axe
this is allowed?
did you try doing an intermediate step with partial sums formula
oh
Can you explain. I thought they just used the GP formula
that could be a way to justify it
They did, but the question is - can you use it. It would not be unreasonable to suspect that the convergence needs to be uniform in order for it to be allowed.
The TLD;DR is that you need to think about it well before doing so.
Right
Makes sense
Closed by @winter lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-36 message
my mistake
the exponent on the second line
ok it still works as f(n)^(n+1) doesn't give any indeterminate form
.close
Closed by @winter lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay so I still need help clarifying the argument in the second and third quadrants
So for these examples the argument = theta
So fir the second quadrant theta=pi-alpha
And third quadrant
Theta=pi+alpha
Are you talking about the argument of a complex number, as in arg(z)?
Yes argument in modulus argument form
It's always the angle with the positive x axis
So
It's mod 2pi and can be considered within (-pi, pi] but the starting point of the angle stays the same
Right
So my diagram is correct?
Nvm
It's incorrect
So is the argument the arrow?
Yes
Ok ty
@rain sentinel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct
appears so
but i would use a more obvious colour than dark blue
could barely see it
Closed by @hardy jackal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know the values of cos and sin of (6pi) ?
0 times anything equals ?
Closed by @rain sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i do this? Explain in ez words im braindead
@distant inlet Has your question been resolved?
gang
.close
Closed by @distant inlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you want the 3rd quartile, or 75th percentile, or top 25%, so the probability in invnorm is 0.75 (75th percentile). so with the other parameters you should have invnorm(0.75, 119, 16)
Exactly, I did that, but it gave me the same exact answer as Q1, and I do NOT know what went wrong lol
I pasted it to the right, if that was incorrect
well you could compute without it then, you have the mean and standard deviation, so just with the z score for the 75th percentile you can calculate it normally i.e. no shortcut functions
So I just have to find the z-score?
yeah, typically in class (or at least in mine) you'd get a table of z scores
so it shouldnt be disallowed knowledge or anything
I see. I don't have a table of z-scores or anything. I was just told to use the invnorm function
I didn't even know you could find that from calculating the z-score
i will say im not sure why you're getting 108.21 for both Q1 and Q3 using invnorm
I got -7.39 for the z-score
I don't know either. I pasted left for Q1, then right for Q3, but it got me the same answer for some reason
well you shouldn't be swapping the tail
the z score formula won't really help because you're solving for the x-value
you rearrange it to get x = mean + (z * std_deviation)
X-value? I thought it was q3
yes we're solving for the x-value at q3
I guess they want you to use invnorm only for some reason ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Yeah, I don't know
She said that because the written calculations can sometimes be messy and take up time so we use calculators, TI-84s
So the answer is 129.78 after doing this calculation
something like that
you should be getting something similar with invnorm
Agh no its not
im not sure whats different between the two
Likeee.. To 130?
no by 0.01
129.79
give it a shot
How does the rounding work that way tho
fwiw this is what i was talking about with invnorm
I see
Yeah, we don't have that lol
I dunno what is going on with this math anymore
it doesn't, but if you recalculated with the more accurate z-score of 0.6745 you'd get the appropriate decimal which rounds to .79
I see, I see
Yeah, I didn't know I was supposed to use a site, I just calculated with what you gave me lol
My bad
its fine im hardly learned in statistics since its not important to my major/career
That's fair
i would recommend figuring out why invnorm wasn't working out for you though
It's not to mine either, I don't think, it's just required for my major and is good if I switch my major, I guess
I'm trying to do psychology bro
lol
Will do, I'll ask my prof!
Thank you for the help :,)
.close
Closed by @whole hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why did the top intergrand change from 1 to -1
Good handwriting
upper bound/limit, not integrand
@plush haven when we do u substitutions we must also change the bounds of the integral. So we go from x = 0 to u = 0, but when x = 1, then u = -x^2 = -1
(we also substituted for the lower bound it just happened to not change)
Closed by @plush haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with a geometry problem which I'm like 90% done
Given triangle ABC inscribed in circle (O). T is an arbitary point on (BOC). The line thorugh T perpendicular to OT intersects BC at X. Construct paralellogram ATXY. AY intersects BC at Z. Prove that AX and ZT intersect at a point on the radical axis of (BOC) and (XYZ).
I only need TA^2 = TZ.TF
Also AX intersects (XYZ) at a second point E, TZ intersects (BOC) at a second point F
ok ty
@toxic pike Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@toxic pike Has your question been resolved?
me not a geometry pro, is TA a tangent to the leftmost circle ?
if yes, then this is a direct result of the tangent secant theorem
Thats what we need to prove rn yes
@toxic pike Has your question been resolved?
@toxic pike Has your question been resolved?
@toxic pike Has your question been resolved?
@toxic pike Has your question been resolved?

I think you should ask gemini or chatgpt
That's the worst thing you can ask an AI.
AI sucks in geometry.
<@&268886789983436800>
may not work, but this looks suspiciously the same as if in a circle ABP is a secant and PT is a tangent for some exterior point P, then $PT^2 = PA\cdot PB$
Annie Maqionde
exteextend TA from point A on the left circle
@toxic pike Has your question been resolved?
It wont cut yes but we need to actually prove it
heart attack 😭
is this question a real question?
woah woah woah woah
what is the need for you to ping here
-# ||oh yeah he blocked me for no reason kek||
What grade is that.
<@&268886789983436800> spam
Yes
I dont really know tbh
Help
if you can get DAB+DCB=TAC then i got a solution
Holy. The fact that I've seen shit worse than this...
Would maybe explode the circles to make their curvature 0. Then it would just be angle chasing I think
sob
Hi, do you still need help? If so, on which part?
this question will return on doomsday 🙏
Have you tried an analytic approach @toxic pike
😭yo put a spolier or smth
💀
I have no idea what that is

This puts mental health of people on this server in danger bro😭
discord is a not a safe place in general
With is that question
😶
I guess at your place geometry is different
Probably some of the Descartes Oxy stuffs
Oh I meant as in analytical geometry, like using coordinate geometry
there's some pretty nice properties like S1-S2=0 being the radical axis of two circles where S1 and S2 stand for the circle equations/power of a point, T=0 being the tangent equation for a point where there's a nice transformation you can do to S to obtain it, and more
it would be very algebra heavy and grindy but possibly worth it if you haven't got a solution yet
Oh I understand but I’m not allowed to use that thing on this problem 
@toxic pike IMO ?
What the question
Vietnamese Math?
Ya
Đợi sáng mai có kq
This is the whole question
😃 ok
Dậy t ra rồi
Bây giờ muốn TA^2=TZ.TF
Thì TA.TA=TZ.TF
=> TA/TF = TZ/TA
Mà ATXY là hình bình hành(Given)
=> AZ//TX
=> góc TAZ = góc ATX ( 2 góc so le trong)
Xét đg tròn BOC có
TX là tiếp tuyến tại F và TF là dây cung
=> góc ATX = góc TBF
Vì TX là tiếp tuyến BOC
Và AZ//TX
Do t/c hbh ATXY
I wonder how TX is tangent to (BOC)
You're saying TX is tangent of (BOC)?
where’s the original problem statement screenshot
it's in vietnamese
what on earth is this thing
geometry 😄
try asking on aops
geometry jumpscare
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
this is your time of dying
send it, ill translate to yall
I already translated it to English
.
original problem
hmmmm
can u draw a better one?
ý tôi là bạn có thể vẽ hình bé hơn được không, cái đường tròn BOC to quá :/
holy geom
what's the original version
Vietnamese geometry welcome
how do i solve that
Funny enough, my lecture a few weeks ago was on that!
math oly shyt?
Given triangle ABC inscribed in circle (O). T is an arbitary point on (BOC). The line thorugh T perpendicular to OT intersects BC at X. Construct paralellogram ATXY. AY intersects BC at Z. Prove that AX and ZT intersect at a point on the radical axis of (BOC) and (XYZ).
Wth is this
I mean im vietnamese grade 10 and I'm pretty familiar with these
My weakest area is 2D geo so I usually dont don't do these but usually you do one part then similar prove for the others
That's the case with most cluttered problem but sometimes you do have to use every info
Guys can y'all help me to solve this problem
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
if you mean just 3^40 + 3^40 + 3^40 part i think it's just 3^41
i mean my idea is to prove TA is tangent to (AZF) but i think you have to get more extra lines
Yes
since there isn't anything know by AF
so there's no way it's solvable with the current shape
also how does proving TA^2 = TZ*TF solve the problem
AX intersects TZ at D
DX intersects (XYZ) at E, TD intersects (BOC) at F
Therefore we need to prove that TXFE is a cyclic quadrilateral
Sorry I had to go grab some stuffs
This is equivalent to EFT = EXT
EXT = EAZ
So we need to prove that EFT=EAZ
Or AEZF is a cyclic quadrilateral
or AFZ=ZEX
ZEX=ZAX+AZE=ZAX+YXE=ZAX+XAT=ZAT
So we need to prove AFZ=ZAT
or TA^2 = TF*TZ
And then I'm stuck ther
e
Ur cooked
I don't think that is a very helpful comment to make.
<@&268886789983436800> Commenting in many help channels, unhelpfully
(already got dealt with
)
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
K I asked the problem to my teacher and he solved it (credit to NguyenLePhuoc on Facebook)
Let AZ cut (O) in N, we have AN // TX so TA = TN
After that AFNT is cyclic which lead to AEZF is cyclic
same lol tho
@toxic pike Have you made any progress?
Ur every where@tranquil jackal
I look around
well first step i would do is showing AZ // TX
Since $Z\in AY$
Minhh
But, TX is perpendicular to OT (as given), so AZ also perpendicular to OT
now we will need to show that OTXZ is in a circle
Consider the circle centre O where the ABC inside, we see that OB=OC= radius
Then thecircle where OBC (O not centre) is symmetrical across the perpendicular bisector BC
But TX perpendiclar to OT and AZ perpendicular to OT that you can prove this quadrilateral inside that circle
Wait we're solving this question right?
ye boss
Let me state it clear first.
I didn't construct this diagram.
So we are supposed to prove that P lies on the radical axis right?
How hasn't this channel timed out?
still no somehow damn
@toxic pike do you still need help
Oh It's done
then you should close this
.close
Closed by @toxic pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you're welcome
This has been closed for 7 hrs how isn't it available yet
idek
If you need help open a channel
Aight mb
Can we get someone to close this because I see no reason for it to still be open
Even after it's been closed
This is by design
A long channel will stay open for a little while after it's been closed
Where does it say that 🤔
It's not documented if that's what you mean

<@&286206848099549185> i need help with this equation
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
It's not occupied
oh nvm
Type the bot too fast
This channel is in an evil limbo
but next time, go to an empty channel like #help-14
Not quite open, not quite closed
Ok good to know
dw there was one which was here for four days after it was closed
this one will go faster
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-36 message
.close reset timer
Closed by @whole halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone have the time to list which formulas i need to use to solve these?
From left to right
1- The x^n integral
1- And the e^x Intgeral
2- algabric factorization of quadratic
Second picture
1- x^n Intgeral
2- multiplie the x to the root
The down picture
1- x^n
2- e^ax Intgeral
by 1 and 2 do you mean a and b?
Yes
great thank you so much
Any time mate
Closed by @pine lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it possible to split a circlr into three areas of equal area with 2 NON intersecting chords
No bro
wait actually you can
by making 2 parallelels chords but must be on the opposite sides of the centre
and each of these segments must make 1/3 area, which is compulsory
and to show this you cant just use ruler or normal calculator but need to use Area of a segment of a circle's formula
they don't have to be parrallel either, it's just harder to do
well you can but i think parallel would be easier
@red tree Has your question been resolved?
i see

