#help-36
1 messages · Page 227 of 1
Oh
Im stupid nevermind
There are 8 sorry
So 8×2 is 16
Do I find the surface area of these 16 faces then subtract it from the final answer?
yes
So like 16×(3)^2?
yes
But the answers don't match up then
also since I have come this far, I've checked your original answer
I don't think it's right
how many exposed faces did you find?
don't calculate their total area. just tell me how many exposed faces you found.
In the last method or this one?
original
36 faces
cuz from your answer of 540 and a surface area per face of 9, that means you somehow found 60 exposed faces, when there are only 54 TOTAL faces on 9 cubes, not even including the hidden ones
So I did it wrong then
What did I do wrong tho I don't get it
The front has 9 faces and so does the the back
well ok, I see why now
What do you mean?
where did this 210 come from?
you only have 5 exposed faces on the top and bottom
should be clear what I mean now, right?
look through your work again
Oh is it supposed to be 180?
explain your working.
ok nvm I miscounted the hidden faces
yes, there are 9
I missed one junction at the left
my bad on that one. but either way, the two methods must agree
Okay so let me do this again
Since there are 5 faces at the top
The formula should be 5×(3)^2?
Oh okay that's what I was doing wrong
you know they're all cubes of the same size. they should be constant anyway
Mhm
the fewer calculations you make, the less the chances of making mistakes
Okay can you give me a sec to do the calculations?
so might as well just make it 9 instead of always having to write 3^2 over and over again
it's your channel, mate. take as long as you want, so long as the channel doesn't close
Oh right that's genius
Ty
Okay so the top and bottom are both 45
The left and right have 4 faces so they are 36
The front and back have 9 faces so they're 81
So do I add these now?
do you need to ask me again
You're right sorry
pretty sure I told you what to do if you're asked to find a total 
well done
also, normally if you're given this kind of problem
toss away any area shit first
just count faces
Okay
whether you want to do direct counting (exposed faces) or complementary counting (subtract hidden faces from total), just count faces first
Got it
you already know the area per face is constant, so once you're done counting faces, mult the number of faces by the area per face and you're done
Right
Again thank you so much for helping me out with this I really appreciate it
So do I just close the channel now?
Nice
Closed by @livid tangle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$dim(Null(T^*))= dim(Range T)^{\perp}$
wai
now what
You want to solve a) or b)?
(a)
I suppose dim(Range(T))^perp=. dim(W)-dim(range(T))
and dim(range(T)= dim (V) = dim(null(T))
is that it?
View linear map as matrices, then f: W->F will be a one times dim(W) row vector and T is a dim(W) times dim(V) matrix. f•T=0 becomes the usual sense of matrix fT=0, thus dim(kernel(T*)) will be dim(V)-dim(rank(T))=dim(V)-(dim(W)-dim(ker(T)))
Is my reasoning using rank nullity not right here
Definition of this ^perp
You wanted to say dim(V)-dim(Null(T)) right? Sure. It is correct
Looks good to me
Yea
thanks
Uh, so
Is it just 1
Like let $T$ be an eigenvector then we have $\mathcal{A}T=T$
Just came back. Let me see
wai
What is L(V)? Is it short for L(V,V) or something
yes
Doesn’t seem right, you have picture showing the definition?
L(V) and T*
wai
so I need to find the solutions to $T^*=\lambda T$
wai
This bracket, <>, what does this mean
inner product
Then i think the correct expression is A in L(L(V), L(V*)). Anyway, its eigenvalues, let me think…
Lambda has to be 1
$\langle Tv,v \rangle = \langle v, T^*v \rangle = \langle v, \lambda T v \rangle = \lambda \langle Tv, v\rangle$
wai
so $\lambda =1$
wai
Matrix wise, A maps T to transpose of T
choose a basis (e_i) of T, T(e_i)=(e_i)B, then T* e_j* (e_k)=e_j* (T(e_k))=B_jk. Thus T* corresponds to B^T
So it’s the transpose. Clearly, eigenvalues are 1 and -1
han't my working shown it must just be 1 though
when the field is R
Oh this space L(V) then is the direct sum of those two eigenspaces, symmetric matrices and anti symmetric matrices (A=(A+A^T)/2+(A-A^T)/2)
A^2=id so 1 and -1
Two eigenspaces, consisting of symmetric matrices and anti symmetric matrices respectively. The direct sum of two is exactly L(V)
(v, Tv) can be zero
oh right
right
Find v,w such that (Tv, w) doesn’t equal 0 then λ^2=1
This can be done since T as a eigenvector is nonzero
Closed by @warm python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I'm having a lot of trouble determining the bounds for the z part of the integral, the two planes don't seem to intersect at all in the first octant. Maybe I've completely misinterpreted the way you need to solve triple integrals.
@hidden tulip Has your question been resolved?
@hidden tulip Has your question been resolved?
Well, i got a slight clue of what it could be
This is the two planes restricted to the first octant
If you connect that little triangle looking directly perpendicular to the plane, you get something as follows.
Something like a slab
it's weird that slab is unbounded though
ik
But thats about the best you can do ig. Its just the positive part of the function used as floor.
We assume the bounds are also restricted to the 1st octant
These problems are computer generated by my school (not ai)
they might have missed something
So there is a non-zero chance this is a bugged question
hiii
I'll try working with the bounds of the slab I guess
I've given up and will just make a discussion with the professor
There's no point doing it if it's so crudely defined
.close
Closed by @hidden tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you approach an exercise where you're asked to give the classification (up to isomorphism) of covers of the Klein Bottle ?
I know that you can cover the klein bottle with R^2, T^2, mobius strip etc, but how do you formalize it ?
What do you mean a “cover”?
if p1 and p2 is the covering space function of resp the first and second covering, then two covering are isomorphic if there's a function that renders the diagram commutative
There is a chapter 10 in Rotman, algebraic topology. In it, covering mappings are classified kind of like an analogy of Galois theory
A bit long to put it here…
You need to find the universal covering, then all covering is between this universal covering and the Klein bottle itself. Very similar to Galois theory
ok, should you use a group theory approach to it then ? With only generators etc. ?
No. It’s just very similar to Galois theory from appearance. But totally within algebraic topology.
hmmm ok, and how would I know when I have all the coverings ?
It’s proven in the chap 10
The result is
Let G be a subgroup of π(X, x_0), this case X is the Klein bottle. Let X_G be the set of equivalent classes of paths in X starting from x_0. Where the equivalent relation is defined by: two paths f, g. f(0)=g(0)=x_0, are equivalent if f(1)=g(1) and f* g^-1 is in G. Denote the equivalent class of f by <f>. This set has a topology defined by a basis A(U, <f>)={<f * λ>: λ is a path in U with λ(0)=f(1)} for all open U and <f>.
X_G is a covering space , i: X_G->X, mapping <f> to f(1) is a covering map
It has the property that i_{*} π(X_G, <constant path at x_0>) is isomorphic to G. When you take G={e}, X_{e} is the universal covering
So a one to one correspondence between coverings of X and subgroups of π(X, x_0). Very much like Galois theory
Though you need to read that chapter for proofs
Closed by @unborn matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do you mean by example?
show the prouduct of two n-cycles doesn't commute if n≥3
that’s overkill and not true in general
(1,2) and (2,3) ig
but we have to take an example for that right
sure. problem done
i was asking for any other way
since i just don't want to prove for S3
you have proven it for all the other ones too
OH WAIT
FUCK
what am i doing bruh
those are also elements in S_4
mentally going insane
that don’t commute
just realized that omg 😭
just take two 3 cycles that don't commute
Closed by @bronze grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get some help
I can't promise to help you depending on what the question is, but it's faster if you just ask the question outright, rather than waiting for someone to respond.
Sure
I’m taking Calulus 2 about integration and I have a homework I need to solve by tomorrow I need some help with explaining 3 questions
Question 1
Question 2
Question 6
Regarding to question 2
For the integration the start point should be 4 and end point could be 5
Because we need a number that is higher than 3 right for the start point
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question!
Sure I’ll show my work the formulas and writing are not in English does that effect?
The way that I’ll use the formula
The formula is
In English
I suppose ill try to understand
This is the first question I have wrote a list of formulas for integrations but the first one I’m not quite sure how to start with it I’ve wrote the start point which is always the below and the upper is the end point afterwards as I remember you should just look at denominator
On this question I’m stuck at that part
I dont understand whats happening . Which one are you trying to do and whattt
These are the rules i use to solve these types of questions depends on the question
I'm not good at explaining
if you could explain for me the question i'll be thankful
I would just simplify all the integrals then split them to parts
Like at the first there is the term which can be turned into x^2+x/(x^2+6x+10)
6th one is the easiest
(\int a^{x}dx) = (a^x)/lna
nigerian man
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Yep that is
Question 1 is a bit tricky for me
could i ask another question please
it would be the last question
Yea
I would like to inquire if my steps are right and the reason why that we are allowed to use a calculator which is much easier for us I’ve been studying online but most of the channels explains the material without a calculator
I dont understand the confusion here but i doubt you should use a calculator because it will just give you the answer
I meant to ask am I doing the right steps while solving the question
Apologies for not explaining well
For this question as I saw on YouTube that you just directly put it on the calculator
Its probably that you just started calculus and your professor/teacher prob asked for you to do some steps to help you understand
I dont know what steps you should do, but you’re prob doing it right
I'm good for now tyyyyysm
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@vivid crystal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys i need help
did you manage to find any other angles
no
i only know 82
cuz it says 82
wait
do i have to do 82 + 82
and than take that away from 180
and the answer is k
im gonna try that actually
im srry
if you wanna do math as a "find the right answer" exercise while giving 0 shits about understanding anything then thats on you
ok, then you phrased it poorly
you must have spotted that this red angle was alternate with the purple angle.
and then you used the fact that this triangle in the pic is isosceles, so it had angles 82, 82 and k
how do i end this ticket
that's weird
it should
.close
...no?
bot's down, huh.
wait let's try this again
.close
nope ok i guess she is down
.close
Closed by @tired walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@sour helm there you go, now bot's back up
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
part B
what have you tried?
umm i constructed CG (point G lying on AB) || DF
and then applied BPT but still i can't prove it
is there work you can show? I wanna see what's stopping you
@teal glen Has your question been resolved?
not yet
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to dip, I attempted it myself and couldn't conclude it so I can't help you. <@&286206848099549185> if anyone else could
So C = 90.
AEF = CED (angles).
D = A
B = F.
then we use these and... it works out, right?
it's just that the sides opposite equal angles are proportional.😭 sorry if im wrong; just saying
maybe it helps.
C = 90 is written nowhere in the ques
it doesn't make a difference anyway, because to prove they are similar, we only need to prove that two of their angles are equal, and that's already the case here
hey try using BPT for the traingle BDF with line CG you constructed
you should be able to figure it out after that
just remember BG+GF=BF nad BC+CD=BD
its a pretty old question i think i remember doing it when i was in 10th too
@teal glen Has your question been resolved?
do you want me to verify or your done
If so close ticket
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i need help with this part of my working out i know i have to multiply something by something else to get the missing ratios however i forgot the process
seems like some info is missing here
its just a part of my working out however if the numbers dont work out, then my process is wrong and i need to try something else
We need to know what exactly you're working out to know if it's right or wrong
@vital crag hi
i can show the question
moment
Yes please
Yup
And now there's two ways to do this, one is algebraic and one is just some numerical manipulation
i went through it in class, but i dont remember how we did it
it was on my mock paper and we used the sort of ratio thing i had here
yea
If you can make the M value equal for both, you can combine them into S:M:L
yeah i was asking how to go about that
Well the first one has M = 4 and the second has M = 1
yea
How do we make them equal
Well which one would be "cleaner"
^
So do that
sooo the top ratio would be 3:4:8?
Yup
thank you
.close
Closed by @plucky rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How I do this
which part?
A
look at the examples near the end here: https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/ConservativeVectorField.aspx
it has a systematic procedure for finding potential functions
In this section we will take a more detailed look at conservative vector fields than we’ve done in previous sections. We will also discuss how to find potential functions for conservative vector fields.
I only understand the first part for integrating x
I don’t get the stuff afterwards
so once you integrate with respect to x, you are left with some function
(result of integral) + g(y,z)
the g(y,z) has to go there because it stands for all the functions depending only on y and z which were lost due to the partial derivative
But it says g(y,z)=0 so what’s the point
And it says differentiate but I don’t see any chnages
g(y,z) is only sometimes 0
So what am I suppose to do after integrating the x
All they did was add g(y,z) and removed it. And then it wasn’t even part of final solution. Same with z
let's take a super basic example, $\vb F(x,y,z) = \langle 1,1,1 \rangle$
Since $\grad f(x,y,z) = \vb F(x,y,z)$ we know $\pdv fx = 1$, $\pdv fy = 1$, $\pdv fz = 1.$ therefore we have
[ f(x,y,z) = \int \pdv fx \dd x = \int 1 \dd x = x + g(y,z) ]
Taking derivative wrt $y$,
[ \pdv fy = 0 + \pdv gy = 1 \implies \pdv gy = 1 ]
Integrating wrt y:
[ g(y,z) = \int \pdv gy \dd y = \int 1 \dd y = y + h(z) ]
So so far we have $f(x,y,z) = x + g(y,z) = x + y + h(z)$. Then again differentiating:
[ \pdv fz = 0 + 0 + \odv hz = 1 \implies \odv hz = 1 ]
Therefore
[ h(z) = \int \odv hz \dd z = \int 1 \dd z = z + C ]
So our potential function is
[ f(x,y,z) = x + y + z + C ]
we can choose any value of $C$ we want
cloud ☁
fuck yoiu man
How is dg/dy =1
dont ask quesitons. it just equals one
it will always equal one if its just dg/dy
im lying
<@&268886789983436800>
@hollow bough if all you are going to do is come into here is be rude and unhelpful, you can take some time off
Also how is df/dz 0+0 and =1
we know that $\pdv fy = 1$ and we previously found a formula thay says $f(x,y,z) = x + g(x,y)$. just comparing the two gives
[ \pdv fy = \pdv{}y (x) + \pdv gy = 0 + \pdv gy ]
for the first expression and
[ \pdv fy = 1 ] for the second
cloud ☁
they must be equal, therefore dg/gy = 1
So I just put dg/dy same as the y equation from the given vector
?
you find df/dy from the expression you got from integrating f wrt x and compare that to the df/dy from the vector. that gives you an equation to solve for dg/dy
Bruh what
I don’t understand anything after this
ok so if i know f(x,y,z) = x + g(y,z), what is df/dy?
So I find derivative of x+g(x,y)?
you just write dg/dy, nothing more to it than that
0+dg/dy
it should depend only on the variables we haven't integrated yet
I meant do I derivative the x also
no, there is no need
That’s how I got 0+ here tho
we are doing this in order to figure out what g(y,z) is so differentiating wrt x would be unhelpful
I did it with respect to y
so both of our expressions for df/dy must be equal
the one from the vector, and the one we got from differentiating
Ok
So mine I have x^8 +dg/dy
dg/dy =-x^8?
So I replace dg/dy with the y in the vector
no
you have df/dy = x^8 + dg/dy from your previous work and df/dy = x^8 - 2y/(y^2+z^2) from your vector
knowing only these two facts, what is dg/dy?
-2y/y^2+z^2
yes
Now I derivative with respect to z?
not yet, now that you have dg/dy you should use it to find what g(y,z) is
So I integrate -2y/y^2+z^2
yes
With respect to y?
yes, you have dg/dy so integrating wrt y is what undoes that
Ok I got -ln|y^2+z^2|
ok that's mostly correct but you must add a "constant of integration"
since you had a function which dependend on y and z, and you integrated dg/dy, this erased any information you have about functions depending only on z
so you must add a function depending only on z now
So I set -ln.. +h(z) = to the z from the vector?
Or I derivative with respect to z first
well have g(y,z) = -ln(...) + h(z), so plug that into your f first
@quiet garden Has your question been resolved?
I plug z from the vector as g(y,z)?
you previously found that f(x,y,z) = x^8 y + g(y,z)
plug in your new expression for g(y,z) into that
X^8-ln..
So that +h(z)?
remember this is what you got, x^8*y + g(y,z)
so x^8 y - ln|...| + h(z)
How do I find h(z) now
I derivative with respect to z? Then integrate it?
same procedure, you differentiate wrt z and compare to your vector to find out what dh/dz is, then integrate that
@quiet garden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am writing a report and i have this integral as one of my functions. how do i explain that this cannot be solved by hand and must be done through a calculator?
$\int_0^\nu\sqrt{1+(R_0+\omega x)^2\sin^2(\varsigma x)-2(R_0\omega+\omega^2x)\varsigma\sin(\varsigma x)\cos(\varsigma x)+\omega^2\cos^2(\varsigma x)}dx\
\omega=\frac{R_H-R_0}{H}$ and $\varsigma=\frac{2\pi}{P}$
Amby
tf
lol
💀 gl
@zealous stump Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I mean you can just write the integral as it is. Need not solve it if its for a report and its this complicated
i know i don't need to solve it but how do i justify that it cannot be solved or that i shouldn't solve it
why dont you ask your supervisor
i don't have time its due tomorrow...
if theres no simple closed form you can say that
so i can just say that the integral cannot be solved using elementary functions because it consists of a square root function with multiple parameters?
@zealous stump Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @zealous stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im getting nowhere on this question pls help
Do you mean $\binom{n}{r-k}$?
Cogwheels of the mind
$\sum_{k=0}^{r}(-1)^{k}(k+1)(k+2)\binom{n}{r-k}=2\binom{n-3}{r}$
Cogwheels of the mind
@north marsh Has your question been resolved?
^
Oh second line k is still from 0 to r, I wrote infinity
(Even though generating functions we use series, derivative, antiderivative it is still pure algebraic, elements of the Laurent ring Q[x,x^-1]. So it won’t affect your taste.)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im trying to find the convolution of this function but don’t know how to proceed
@safe oyster Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @safe oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Perhaps calculating the length of the vertical slice inside that region for a given x could help?
.close
Closed by @frosty sigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me integrate this💔
Do you know u substitution?
take out the constants first
yes a bit
you mean take out 2?
Not only the 2
Yes
a
You know it
So what goes outside the integral?
a
someone help me get the RHS
More precisely ?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
like how we got the RHS
root a
Yes
OHH
So whats lasting now
You can do it from now im sure
like this?
this channel is occupied. #❓how-to-get-help to figure out how to claim yours (it's a very complicated process)
Exactly
YAYYY THANK YOUUU
You're welcome
.closed
no d
Closed by @unborn pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The answer is C for this question, but I don't know why.
I thought it was A, because if x = y = z, then surely this just forms a diagonal square, which has all right angles?
you want necessary and sufficient, not merely sufficient
C is less of a constraint than A
you can have SPQ=90° without A
SPQ=90° iff triangle SPQ satisfies converse-Pythagoras
SP^2 = x^2+z^2, and PQ^2 = x^2+y^2
and SQ^2 = y^2+z^2+2yz
as someone who sat this exam previously i would suggest censoring that, the Pythagoras hint is already pretty significant and this exam rewards the struggle
i mean op is presumably looking at a past paper
the issue isn't academic honesty it's the fact that there are limited resources for this exam and wasting a question is p significant
but also I recommend reading the logic notes by UAT
and maybe book of proof by hammack for enrichment
wait wdym?
i see, will do
i assume you are aiming for top UK unis if u are doing TMUA, with only ~16-18 papers every question should be done with struggle
if you're applying for CS/math at least
this was a comment to Ann though, not you so dw
ok well what's done is done ig, im not gonna say more
you can get upset if you want but I'd argue helping OP takes priority, @tulip panther, if you'd like extra support feel free to DM or ping me in a help channel
im struggling to understand what you've done here
i understand this
i dont understand where this comes from
and whats converse pythag?
i see
if a triangle's sides satisfy a^2+b^2=c^2 then the angle opposite c is right
(regular pythag is if the angle opposite c is right then a^2+b^2=c^2)
well then look at the diagram. what's SQ
ah
the hyp of SPQ?
I believe what confused you here is the wording, because when A is sufficient, it is not necessary
i do realise that now
it never hurts to go back to basics and plug in your own set of values to double check
what's its length
i would assume its root of SQ^2
which is root of SP^2 + PQ^2
so root of 2x^2 + y^2 + z^2
i dont understand where 2yz comes from
@tulip panther Has your question been resolved?
$(y+z)^2 = y^2 + 2yz + y^2$
maxtsg
ohhhhh
i was thinking of it through the two sides
i get it nowwww
thank you
.close
Closed by @tulip panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is a past final
i still am super shaky on all types of problems relating volumes and applications of integrals
what does lnx look like in general?
that is unfortunate because it is one of 2 quadrants ln(x) is in
well yeah
how is ln(x) defined
uhm
like what is it
ln of x
what's ln(1)
No
nvm
Why?
cuz e to the 0 is 1
yes
soooo
yes
so to plot it you just need to know how to plot e^x
and that's easier
do you know how to plot e^x
So r we good on this now?
idk
Well, the fourth quadrant is when x is positive and y is negative
first question is ln(x) increasing
no
yes
but in the 4th quadrant like its still increasing but like
i just got confused cuz its negative
its increasing but its negative
yah
and then, the fourth quadrant well it starts at x=0
and from what we've just observed
ln(x) will become positive at x=1
so
we only have to figure out how to plot ln(x) for 0<x<1
does that make sense
(because that is what will remain in the fourth quadrant)
well as ln(0) approaches infinity so its just like this curve until it his 1 in the fourth quadrant
well, if it was rotated about the x-axis would you know what to do
no
There is a formula for that
whats it called like cross section washer disc idk
theres cylindrical shells
im like aware of them but idk how to use any
i dont feel like i dont understand the process of how to use them
I can recommend you a good video
it would be better and have visuals than what someone can explain here just chatting
ok
Volume of Solid of Revolution rotated about different lines. Disc method vs. shell method for calculus 1 or AP calculus students.
Visit my site for the file and the answer key: https://blackpenredpen.com/calc1
If you enjoy my videos, then you can click here to subscribe https://www.youtube.com/blackpenredpen?sub_confirmation=1
My math T-shirt...
this one is quite good
and if you have questions about something in the video, the u can like point out the timestamp and ask here
i watched that one
optional 2nd video
There are two ways to find the volume of three dimensional objects in calculus: the disk washer method and the cylindrical shell method.
What is the disk washer method? What is the cylindrical shell method? That's exactly what I'm going to talk about today. I will show you the differences between the disk washer and the cylindrical shell method...
ok ill try the second one
also what about cross sections is that something that i need to worry about or is it more simple
that’s how we derive the formula, you don’t have to directly deal with them in the computation
it’s just we sum up the cross sections to make the volume
infinitely many times -> integration
yup
were u taught any formulas tho, like a standard one to use in ur hw
ok so i draw like a sort of infinite cone going down
yes !!!
so the intregral im guessing is from -infinity to 0
and A(y) would be the area of a circle
if the radius is x then it would x=e^y
YES but would be x²
yes
yesss
no u cannot
,tex \int_{0}^{\inf} \pi e^2y dx
aoba
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$\int_{0}^{\infty}\pi e^{2y}dx$
Austin
Ok it's dx?
Isn't it negativity infinity to 0
dy ur right
Yeah if it was dx do we use shells?
aoba
im tryna put the graph on this
hold on
wait how to put the shaded region on the graph again on desmos
oh nvm i did it
yayy let’s see
also in terms of formulas, now that u already derived em let’s re paste em
$\int_{a}^{b}\pi y^2 dx$
aoba
this is what we are looking at for a revolution around a vertical line
i think this is the picture for the question
for rotating around x=-1
legendd
is from int -infinity to 0 right
Arent the bounds -inf to 0
waitt isn’t this dx
you can do it both ways
and cone has radius 1
dx or dy
yeah true
since is the volume
we can stick w dy
man is the inf
im only done calc 1
lim when ln x goes to -inf
let me calc that
okay i don’t wannna confuse u ninoo does it make sense u can do dx and dy
okay for now let’s stick with doing dx when rotating vertically since the radius would be on x axis and that dy for rotating horizontally would be dy since radius is on y axis
does this make sense ^
Sort of
if i spin it around vertically, the x axis will be on the flat top of the cone right
I guess yeah
wait isnt this should be 2pi?
since this is doubled the region
from -infinity to 0
if you times 2 then it should be flipped upwards from 0 to inf, and 2pi times [e^y]^2?
I'm just confused atp
ykw i don’t like about this question is that it tries to confuse u by rotating around x = -1, when rly the function doesn’t exist beyond zero
i found my pencil so imma draw to not confuse u gimme a sec
my syllabus question it just tells you
the function
or draws it for you
and rotating 360 degrees vertical or horizontal
to avoid confusion
basically just like that
but to beyond inf?
this is like involving calc 2 (improper integral)
a bit
i assume this question just ask rotating x=-1 which is horizontally
since the x=-1 is legit on the right side of the graph ln x so yea is gotta be the cone shape towards upside down
so this is gotta be
EpicalNerds
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
nice diagram for 3D, Upvote THIS GUY
tyty
yea it should be 2pi
i’m ngl the x=-1 is throwing me off
since is -inf to 0
what do u think epic
the volume of the revolution is
perhaps we can just f(x+1)
i agree w this formula, radius changes right
im not sure about this after evaluatin the integral using dx if you'll get the same thing
u also changed the dy bounds from -inf to 0 to 0 to inf
ans should be 5pi/3
mbmb
OH YEA BOUNDS
when you change the x functions
the bounds also change
so thats why that integral for dy is so odd to me
i’m ngl tho i don’t rly understand using dy for this so i’ll leave it for someone else to explain cus i’ve confused myself tryna understand that
but i can do this with dx though thats not what u may be looking for
sry to confuse u even more nino !!
for that question just look at this
or that vid i just sent you
ans should be that
it should fully detailed explained
lemme fix it for you the dy bound.
$\int_{a}^{b}\pi y^{2}dx$
where y is= $e^y$, a is $-\infty$, b is 0
so the integral becomes
$\int_{-\infty}^{0}\pi e^{2y}dy$
to learn latex u can use overleaf, desmos also natively writes the equations in latex so you can copy paste from desmos paste in latex
EpicalNerds
@carmine plaza Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @carmine plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
volume question again not sure how to draw this one
You want to draw the graph?
do i have to
No
ah
You can just solve for the intersection of y= 0 and y= x^2-x^3 without drawing any graphs
But drawing a graph will definitely make things more intuitive imo
x=0,1
Can you do the rest of the question?
no im not sure how to do the rotations
Have you learnt washers method?
Okay then, if we rotate it about the x axis, what do you think the radius (r) should be?
x? idk
Then maybe we should graph it first
That's okay let's try to graph x^2 - x^3 first
As we know, its roots are at x=0, 1 right?
yes
Okay, so, when x< 0 is x^2-x^3 positive or negative?
negative
You sure 😭
when x is negative x^2 is positive - a larger x^3 number which is negative
oh but its negative
So you end up getting
Positive - (negative) = positive + positive..?
Yeah
Okay, so when x<0 the graph is above the x axis
hi 
And at exactly x= 0, the graph meets the x axis
How about when 0<x<1?
positive?
And when x>1?
negative
You should know what cubic equations look like in general
i do
So this information is enough to piece together a very sketchy graph
but this one had x^2 as well so i assume it would change something in it
Actually not
It's still a cubic
Anyways you should go ahead and graph that
And then I can continue explaining what r should be
Could you send the picture of your graph 
my camera is terrible at best i can send you a desmos picture
Okay that's alright
I'll send the desmos picture then hold up
If we are going to rotate it around the x axis, the radius at 0.5should be the green line
And in general r would be the distance from y=0 to the point f(x) at any point 0<=x<=1
Do you get why?
no
Wait imma plot it in 3d to help you understand better
like for this problem i understand everything except for how they get r0 and ri why do they add +1
So you see this is a rough estimate on what the volume looks like
We want to chop up the area into a bunch of slices, and calculate the radius of each of those slices
Wha
Sry there's too many lines
Those lines are the graph rotated 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°
Do you get it now 😭
I mean I understand the image
It's ok 😭 we can keep going
You understand this right
Yes
The center of each of those slices would be on the x axis right ?
Because we rotate it around the x axis
radius = distance from any point on the circumference to the center of the circle
Right
From this, we know that r = x^2-x^3 - 0
y= 0 is the x axis, and that's where 0 comes from, because that's the center of the circle
So the thing you're subtracting is the place where the intersection happens?
Not intersection
Wdym
The like line it's being rotated by
So here it's rotated by -1 so you subtract -1
That's the one part I find confusing but I think I understand ish
Because y = -1 is the center
Do you understand this or do you want me to elaborate more
Right
Ok let me see if I can do it
Yup I understand
If y= something else it would just be minus that right
So integral from 0 to 1
pi (x^2-x^3)^2 dx
@carmine plaza Has your question been resolved?
@carmine plaza Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @carmine plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the definition of an improper integral?
i see ppl saying like -inf to inf integrals are improper
but arent indefinite integrals proper
im not sure like what it properly means
haha
yeah idk 😔
thats kinda not the point of asking here
an improper integral is generally one that is unbounded
its when the integral either has infinite bounds or goes to infinity within the bounds
Google is best for small stuff like this
i dont udnerstand google
ok
indefinite intergals are unbounded
good for you
unbounded as in (in the most basic sense) you cant draw a rectangle around it
so this one seems like it goes to infinity within the bounsd due to the denominator
yeah, at x=0
an integral without bounds is an indefinite integral though
thats what sorta confuses me
yeah
indefinite is completely different to improper
when its just $\int$ instead of $\int_a^b$
c2b7
like you've done integral problems right?
😭
yes
my god can people stop interrupting if they have nothing useful to say


