#help-36
1 messages · Page 198 of 1
choose small enough epsilon
that it does
well you can choose $\epsilon = \frac{\epsilon_\lambda}{4}$
lifelong dumbass
since it was arbitrary
that works, so does /3
if u use /3 it looks very similar to the proof of fn cont => f cont 😉
ohh ok
oops
well we got there anyway
go ahead with /4 anyway, its not very important
np!
hey do you think this argument works the same way
cause i realise that they're really similar
or if theres anything i could add
maybe but im kinda lazy to fully think it out haha
mhm epsilon is pretty hard bc the million quantifiers
uniform convergence is hard because like
you have to worry about two things
instead of just one
yep u drown in quantifiers
Closed by @still drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
less quantifiers in PDEs, more fun 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i feel wierd on changing a divergent function to a convergent function, then back to a divergent function
how can you do that?
it feels like it defies what i know on functions
generating functions dont care about convergence
@jagged flare Has your question been resolved?
eugh thats wierd
alr ty
.solved
Closed by @jagged flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
are the functions here even divergent
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
National geometry olympiad tomorrow, what should i do
Get good sleep
do you have any questions you are stuck with?
Win
sleep.
Sleep
Sleep, for sure
Thats good
But not too much
Bring also real food
Sandwitch/hot meal
Maybe a fruit
ah yes
Dark chocolate is okay if you only eat 1 or 2 squares
what about during the olympiad?
Water
should i start from the easiest?
Start from what you can solve
only 3 problems kinda wild bru
Eat 2 squares of dark chocolate so you can get the benefits of flavonoids increasing blood flow to the brain without the excess sugar
Solve what you can
don't hesitate to put a question aside for later if you feel stuck doing it.
Wow
But tbh
That doesnt really matter
If ur that dude ull win regardless so get ur ass in bed and be well rested
hell yeah
thanks for sharing yall
i will cook tonight

Closed by @bitter zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need a quick confirmation, and I've read the definition of it.
Proposition is like a "claim", and it does not need to be true, is that correct?
Propositions can be false yes
Closed by @ornate tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Proposition: This is sad 😢 is bad at helping
is an example
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the sin(x°) when there is rectangle ABCD and length of AB = 2,BC = 8 and CD = 4, and point E is on between point B and C?
ok so ABCD isn't a rectangle
anyway i think the way to proceed would to be to find some measurements in triangle ADE -- the most straightforward imo is to find all 3 sides and then apply cosine law
I tried flipping the triangle ABE to create a 90° triangle that has angle x°
how are you flipping exactly?
It creates new 90° triangle I think
Perhaps the 90° triangle formed by the intersection of the extended line of DE and the newly drawn line and points A and E is identical to triangle ABE
√20 / √68 was not an answer
@arctic fiber Has your question been resolved?
what is school like in korea?
@arctic fiber Has your question been resolved?
Apply Pythagoras theorem in triangle ABE to get AE,
Apply Pythagoras theorem again in triangle DCE to get DE,
If you draw a perpendicular from point A on side DC(call the intersection F), you'll divide the line DC into 2-2 ratio. Now if you apply Pythagoras theorem in triangle ADF as well, you'll get the third side of triangle AED.
After that use cosine rule to get cos x -> sin x
The heck is cosine rule?
Then cos(x°) is (√32 + √68 - √20) / ( 2 * √32 * √20 )?
There is square in the numerator
So the result is sin(x°) = (2 * √32 * √20) /( √((2 * √32 * √20)² - (√32 + √68 - √20)²))
Side opposite to the angle you take isn't there in the denominator.
So, cos x would be (68+32-20)/(2 * 8 * root(34))
Then just use the identity of sin & cos to get sin x
I think I solved it
Nice 👍
i find the following version easier to remember, btw:
a²+b²=c²-2ab cos(C)
because this reduces to Pythagoras when C=90⁰
@arctic fiber Has your question been resolved?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was trying to solve a rational equation by eliminating the LCDs but I came across this problem & I can't figure out what went wrong🫠 I'd appreciate it if someone pointed out what I missed
.xy
Why is this a problem?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Because there is a right answer that is 4
I usually denote that as | *4b^2
But I got whatever is on the bottom
I multiplied the whole thing by 4b^2 first and then 2b^2
On the right that should be 4b^3 + 16b^2
After the first multiplication
Yeah, I usually denote it by | (...), if your class does it like this then it's fine
Ohhhh I see
Let me try it out
hol on
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Post this in e.g. #help-3; after the first message in that channel is from you, you automatically occupied it
Closed by @slow vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
NOT YET @final saddle
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Just click on ❌ next time
@ruby kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
when we construct a line equation from 2 vecotrs, our domain on the graph becomes t right?
In the sense that you vary t to get all points on the line yes
In some sense, a line is a function in t, where the domain is ℝ and the range is the line
and what makes us able to give it that domain? like as soon as we create the equation we just slam it on its own graph?
same argument that justifies the real numbers being order isomorphic to a straight line in any context
it might be living in a 3d space, but it's still a straight line
can you please elaburate on this a little more
real numbers being order isomorphic to a straight line in any context
have you ever used a number line
or graph paper
im going to assume yes to graph paper
the axes are a representation of (a copy of) the real numbers, associated with an infinite line called the x-axis or y-axis
yes
also can you have 2 inputs on the same graph at the same time?
for example heres the question i was working on
i got up to this point
i had to construct 2 equations for the line
for each line
💀
i just need help finishing this off
thats it
i know i need to figure out if the lines interesect or not
so i equated the pointsa
<@&286206848099549185> how do i solve for this
i need to solve for if the points equal one anothert
a, b or c
heres the original work
a
wait i didnt get it
its okay
so A0 is the starting position, A1 is the finish, the difference is supposed to be A
same with B
are you saying i need to check if the lines are parallel
But in this specific case, we dont even need that because Ax is between 2 and 12, Bx is between 1 and -8
which means their x wont intercept
i dont get this
i thought i was supposed to solve for something
like for s and t
yes but how do i do it the algebriac way
told you
like by solving the equations
the x ranged dont intersect thus there is no way for the paths to intersect
idk about that you're overcomplicating
well thats for practice
cause were gonna have questions like that on the test
and they might intersect
can you please explain this
whats there to explain
nevermind but how do i do the equation way
idk i have never done that
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey @tranquil pine
?
Do you have a question?
@gray yacht Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this 1/2? shouldnt it be 1/4?
$\int\frac{1}{u^2+2^2}\dd u=\frac{1}{4}\int\frac{1}{(\frac{u}{2})^2+1}\dd u=\frac{1}{4}\tan^{-1}(\frac{u}{2})$ no?
ihave<skissue>
consider the constant from the change of variable / reverse chain rule
are you asking about this step?
you're forgetting du. do the proper u sub with v = u/2
wait
on the right side it’s 1/2 not 1/4
$(1/2 \arctan (u/2))’ = 1/2 \times 1/2 \times {1\over (u/2)^2 + 1}$
Médicis
therefore
$\int {du\over ({u\over 2})^2 +1} = 2 \arctan ({u\over 2})$
Médicis
@jagged flare
oh yea i see
.solved ty!
Closed by @jagged flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The triangle being stacked on top of a larger segment of a circle instead of a half circle kills me
yes but AB ≠ D or 2r
Yeah it isn't
I really dont know how to find another measurement
if I could, I could probably solbe it
Well
Let's start with drawing the image
Also mark the center of the circle and connect it to all the vertices of the triangle
lets mark the center of the circle as D
The convention is O, but do whatever you feel like
i thought of that I just dont know what to use and how to approach it from there
Well send the diagram after doing that
Forgive me for being bad at kt
at first, I was reminded of a problem where a lying cylinder and figuring out the volume of the water but this one for me really lacks given measurements 😓
it rests on top of the circle? Is there anything else?
It's perpendicular to the radius at that point
no way really?
Do you have any ideas for what to do now
Yes that's what tangent means
any tangent line to a circle is perpendicular to the radius
!nosols once again
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
I got it till here
Please let people make observations and solve things themselves
<@&268886789983436800> can one of you delete the solution posted please, thanks
Pythagorean theorem to find OC
actually none lol, they only introduced it to us and started throwing stuff like this
Hmm ok so that's off the table
Can you mark the intersection of OC and AB as something
D
Cool
Now we already know DA
We wanna find OD
Oh actually we don't know DA
Have you done congruent triangles
nope 😓
Interesting
How else are we supposed to show DA = DB
Tbf that should be a property you're allowed to use
We dont know D yet, do we? How do I get it
The line joining the point and the center perpendicularly bisects the line connecting the tangent points
Well D is the intersection point of OC and AB
I mean OD
And then we use this cuz I'm assuming you're allowed to use it
We don't know OD no
We're trying to find DA and DB here
Use this
i'm sorry what?
I gotta leave to grab breakfast, someone else feel free to take over
Alr thanks!
just checking, so you're up to here so far right?
yes
ah, so you actually do need some right-angled trig
you want to find angle POB
P?
I've labelled the top point as P here
oh wait, that's what you've called C
We havent been taught trigonometry ☹️
oh no wonder
Should I just cry
well, you have these similar right triangles
DBO and DCB
ah you still need trig even then
you need to find the area of major circle sector AOB to continue
so that requires finding one of the angles in the diagram
alright, if I give you that angle DOB = 67.38 degrees, can you continue?
I sent the same pic and Xavier cried over it and made me delete it
What injustice
bruh
That was before she had solved it
Are you dumb or are you just acting like it
just r times sin 67.38? Idk im just guessing at this point
so 10 • sin (67.38°)
no, you're not using sin or cos or anything
what is angle AOD?
hence, what is major angle AOB (the one more than 180)?
Major angle?
Can you not antagonise other helpers, and not send full solutions please 
It doesn't work like that
This server bans/restricts full blown solutions and just impinges on the fact that the person who asked the question learns something rather than just seeing the solution and giving up much further thought on solving it
Can we go in a different approach and go on from finding OD then finding the chord AB 🥹
the issue is, that doesn't let you find the area of the circular sector
Yeah we really need the angle here
Once again, the reason for nosols is so that people can't just copy shit as homework solutions and not learn anything further
Having access to solutions can be a good thing for specific people sure. But we have no way of knowing that. And guiding people through the solution still leads to the same outcome without the risk of them copying it and moving on.
But south also made the same diagram which I had made and sent right? Why not ask him to delete? Why bias?
Alright guys, it's a help channel, let's keep it that way.
If you’d like to complain about server policy you’re invited to do so in meta, otherwise please keep help channels on topic. Arguments with other helpers are best done outside of help channel.
Fine @steep hatch
Is AOD the same angle as DOB then?
I won't repeat such insistent behavior again
That is correct as well
Let's step back a little
What properties of tangents do you know
Maybe you could send images of the parts of your book talking about it
Well those could help too
After finding out the angles, how do I proceed?
from here
the major angle is the central angle of the circular sector that is more than 180
so that's still AOB yes
then you can do (sector area) + 2 * (right triangle area) for the total area
search up the formula for the area of a circular sector if you don't know it
doubling the angle gives AOB, but that's not the one more than 180
what do angles around a point sum to?
360
Result:
225.24
Ohhh then I use that in the sector formula?
196.559
,calc 225.24/360 * pi * (10)^2
Result:
196.5589803596
yep! and then the 2 triangles
how? for what? Im sorry im confused
.
ohhh okayokay mb 😓
436.559?
You must be really pissed off based on how bad I am at math 😓
Wait is that it then
@pliant shore sorry for the ping but its done right?
And one last questions, is 67.38° the DOB angle or DBO
,calc 196.5589803596 + 240
Result:
436.5589803596
yep!
I'm not angry
it's DOB
DBO is 90 - that
anyways well done, sorry there was a lot of drama
yesyes I got it now, thankyou very muchhh
I will be coming back later with what I think is definitely harder than this one 😓
Thankyou so much
.close
Closed by @obsidian rivet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it possible to expand this equation into the second equation?
I am not really sure on how to go about this as what i thought of was regular cubic expansion which wouldn't apply for derivatives right?
usually when we expand powers like this, we’re working with addition and multiplication, and we get nice formulas
part of the assumption of how this works is that addition is commutative and associative, multiplication is commutative and associative, and multiplication distributes over addition (so like a * (b+c) = ab + ac)
If we can replace addition and multiplication with operations that behave in that same way, then we can still obtain the same results
in this case, we replace addition of numbers with addition of operators on functions, and we replace multiplication of numbers with compositions of operators on functions
the operators here are just the derivatives, and we can verify all of those nice addition and multiplication properties still work here
(a+b+c)^2 would apply here?
The big important property we need to verify is distributivity, and the reason why composition distributes over addition here is because the derivative is a linear operator
In case you haven’t seen linear functions before, a linear function f is any function such that
f(ax + by) = af(x) + bf(y)
in other words, f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y), so composition directly distributes over addition
(Here, f is the derivative operator, and x and y are functions)
because composition and addition of linear functions works like multiplication and addition of numbers, yes we can use that
And this generalizes to any addition and multiplication of numbers
cubic formula works fine etc
ah alright
tysm man'
i think i got it
but my main query is
d2y/dx2 wouldn't be equal to (dy/dx)^2
that is where my confusion arose
dy/dx is not an operator, that’s a function
or to be more clear
A function maps some input to some output (like y = x^2)
the derivative operator maps functions to functions (like d/dx (x^2) = 2x )
dy/dx is a function, but it’s not an operator on functions. d/dx is the operator
and (d/dx)^2 is just notation for saying we compose the derivative with itself. In other words, apply it twice to whatever we want to apply it to
and operators undergo the same properties as numbers
not necessarily, we have to verify those properties I mentioned earlier
linear operators behave very similarly to numbers, yes
Specifically when we replace multiplication with composition
linear functions do too
these things are very flexible and can be very abstract
you just have to define your operations conveniently
hmm ok
Alright ty
here’s one more example to illustrate the difference between cases a bit better
f(x) = 4x is a linear function from R to R
g(x) = 3x is another linear function from R to R
let h(x) = 2x etc
there’s lots of ways I can combine these functions. I can add them, or I can multiply them, or I can compose them.
If you think about multiplication and addition of generic functions, this behaves like multiplication and addition of numbers
eg f * (g + h) = 4x * (3x + 2x) = 20x^2 = 12x^2 + 8x^2
instead I can think about composition of functions instead of multiplication, and then
f ° (g + h) = 4 (3x + 2x) = 20x
f ° g + f ° h = 4(3x) + 4(2x) = 12x + 8x = 20x
so we can see that composition distributes over addition too
multiplication of functions and composition of functions are clearly not the same thing, but they satisfy very similar properties that we use during expansions, so if we pick one and use that as our interpretation, everything will work out
I could think of d/dx * d/dy as “compute each derivative separately, and then multiply the functions together”
I could also think of
d/dx * d/dy as d/dx ° d/dy, or the composition of the derivatives
there’s lots of ways to interpret this. That latter case is what we actually care about, because we want to compose derivatives together. When I write
(d/dx + d/dy)^2
I don’t want to square functions, I want to apply this sum of derivatives twice. That’s indicating the composition, and we can nicely expand our derivative compositions thanks to linearity
that’s all I have, it’s a little tricky at first but hopefully it’s easier to process the more you see it
Closed by @stoic totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with b, proving that is differentiable in the point 0,0
Closed by @gentle zephyr
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is 2. 8
_. - _
9 7
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Like photo?
Yes
This
On the photo
At first a was checking
Now the photo
Nah
I think we have to remove the 2 on the left of the 1/10
I think u mean 1×2+10
Ye?
no
Then how
you miltiply the 2 by bottom and add the top
imagine the 2 as full fraction meaning 10/10 and now multiply it by 2 giving it 20/20
In iraq the teacher say to remove the 2 we have to do the up × 2 then the number we got plus the down number
Btw i dont understand u
Im not that good at english
U speak arabic?
no..
.solved
Closed by @craggy plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A
xy + 7z
yes, what's the entire question?
lol
Hello there @civic sundial do you have a math question/exercise that you would like to get help with?
.solved
Closed by @craggy plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Sorry my net is slow
Brother, we need the question
are you deliberately getting us to not see the problem
Nice ragebait
Either send an unobscured picture or stop hogging the help channel
hi raphael
watch the question just be "if xy+7z = 9 then what is xy+7z + 1/6 * 1?"
seems believable
Closed by @plucky rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
eh
It's not like any progress was made or lost in the process
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help me please
god today is mixed fractions haunting me day
2/3
2/3 rs?
fraction form of percentage
hi ann
cost prices of flour and sugar are 7x and 3x rupees per kg respectively
Converting this to fraction is easy
in addition to this, the fact you're making 66⅔% profit (a.k.a. profit equal to 2/3 of CP) means SP = 5/3 * CP
work out:
- for 1 kg of rasgullah, how much of each ingredient you need
- how much that'll cost you, in terms of x
- an equation which says 5/3 of that total cost equals the sale price (per kg)
its just a joke about how a helpee earlier insisted on using mixed fractions and it threw me off majorly
ok so it is. can you name which of my 3 steps you're stuck with
i am selling a kg rasgullah at 15 rs per kg..and getting a profit of 2/3..
so CP = 3, Profit = 2, and SP = 5
?
with x
14 /kg is the answer
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
- you have it rather deeply backwards
- you did not follow my instructions
i did
for 1 kg of rasgullah, how much of each ingredient you need
i see this nowhere in what you've written
or maybe you decided to do your own thing or something and then you also dont think to tell me that
,rccw
idk
can you tell the meaning of this 35:9 ratio which you got?
if you can then maybe it's a step in the right direction! but if you cannot then it is not.
i might need to disappear now.
I am coming back to this..after 15m..(dinner time)
Sugar price = 7x = 7 × 2 = ₹14 per kg
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
actually <@&268886789983436800> GPT answer
Left the server?
What's the current process?
ok..now..let me see this again
is this the order of the solution
@tired walrus is this correct?
- I need 7a : 3a of sugar and flour resp. to make 1 kg of rasgulla
- 9x
7:3 is the ratio of COST PRICES. not masses.
mass ratio is 5:3.
im afraid all of this is just full of mis-steps and i will just need to tell you how to do it right
mass ratio of flour and sugar is 5:3
you lined up your ratios wrong
in the question, they purposely altered the order in the other sentence
therefore for 1 kg of rasgullah you need 5/8 kg of flour and 3/8 kg of sugar.
honestly i dont think even lining up ratios is a good approach, but i think i'll soon give up on trying to preach that because subjectively my success rate with it is low
mm i see. it's just that in the end, when you multiply the 7x and 3x, you might mix up the sugar and flour 🙂
thank you for pointing out the reversal anyway
cause i was about to get bamboozled by it
haha
the CP ratio of flour to sugar is 3 : 7 therefore sugar costs Rs. 3x per kg and flour costs Rs. 7x per kg.
therefore total cost price for 1kg of rasgullah is 3x * 5/8 + 7x * 3/8.
rupees.
oh..
i feel as if i should not continue the solution so much that i just do the entire question for you.
but the next step will be to use the info about profit % and sale price
I will try
@soft heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am wondering why the thing I wrote is true, you can find the full theorem in 2.1.5
If something is not clear I can translate
@chilly carbon Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @chilly carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Best way to integrate this?
first thing that comes to mind is simplification via roots of unity
no idea what that is
A simple u-substitution
actually nvm, i doubt that would work
what do I make u
Think a bit
thinking
Don't let yourself be spoon-fed 😉
its either x-1 or just x right?
u ideally wanna cancel out something when doing a u-sub
also u-subbing x would just give u the same integral in terms of u
might as well put x^7 - 1, no?
u right
since when u differentiate, u'll end up with the same derivative
then its ln u
wait would you even need to u sub
yups
bcs its in the form of x^n/(x^(n+1) +c)
i would think you can directly integrate it without any substitutions
X = cos (x) and use linerisation
how would u direct integrate this?
the numerator is a scalar multiple of the derivative of the denominator so its derivative would be a ln function + C
yes that is what a u-substitution does
.solved
Closed by @ivory island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
im doing quadric equations and surfaces and stuff
im just trying to understand the graphing more
so if i had an equation for a cylinder x^2 + y^2 = a^2
to me this looks 2D
but then its also graphes in 3D
bruh
<@&268886789983436800>
<@&268886789983436800>
Oh so u want to understand how the graph of x²+y²=a² extends in 3d?
if you have an equation not involving z, then it will just be the same 2D equation solutions copied for every value of z
if you go on desmos 3D and enter that equation, then click the "extend to 3D" button, it has a nice little animation of this
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
yes
i dont see how thats possible
i just dont understand how thats possible when the book says the standard equation of a cylinder is x^2 + y^2 = a^2
thats just a circle to me
since z is not mentioned, for the purposes of 3D all values of z are solutions
but z isnt even there
How does the graph of x=1 look like?
so how does it extend
yeah but y isn't mentioned is it?
yes
A straight line parallel to y axis. Yea.
wait what does that mean
so we figure out from context that our "base space" for y = 1 is in 2D with (x,y)
if it was in 3D with (x,y,z), it would still be a straight line but we would graph it in a 3D space
so what the graph looks like depends on the context of what coordinates we're assumed to be using
are we being serious
i dont think i understand tbh
can we go over the x = 1 analogy
that is similar
in the context of being 2d, x^2+y^2=a^2 is a circle. i nthe context of being 3d, its a cylinder
for every possible value of z its a circle
so lots of circles stacked on top of each other
aka a cylinder
one circle for every possible "height" z
how does it go up and down though
in a 1D context, x = 1 is just a point (on the number line). it's only a line in 2D and 3D and so on
since y isn't mentioned, we just "copy" that point for every value of y, since every value of y is automatically a solution
but y will just become 0
Y is not 0
y*0?
why should y be 0? y could be anything unless we specifically restrict it
thats just 0
anything * 0 = 0 innit
yeah but it simplifies to 0
its literally not there
When u plot the graph of x=1 in 2D , it contains points like (1,2) (1,3) (1,-2)
y is not 0
y * 0 = 0 has the solution set y = all real numbers
if x = 1 and y= 0, the graph would just be a point (1,0) not a line
bc all real numbers multiplied by 0 are 0
it is only there from the context that we are working in 2D
it's not actually in the equation itself
now that i think of it i dont even understand why x = 1 is a line
when graphing equations, you need to know the context in which you're doing it. this context is usually implied/not stated explocitly
and not a point
if you plug (x,y) = (1,4203) to the equation x = 1 you get true, don't you?
the graph of x = 1 in the xy-plane is by definition the set of all points such that plugging in (x,y) to the equation returns true
x= 1, this equation just says x is 1, and ntg else.
It says ntg abt y.
There's is no constraint on y coordinates.
Just x has to be 1.
y is just chilling, it can be anything since x=1 says ntg abt y.
So the graph of x= 1 would contain points like (1,0), (1,1) (1,2) (1,2.3) etc
but wheres the y 💀
Dude there is no y.
i think i confused u sry :c
y can be ANYTHING
y can be 1, 2 ,3 , pi , e anything
because x=1 doesn't tell us what y is
if there is no y in the equation then it just isn't used when plugging in 
it doesn't prevent you from plugging in (x,y)
it’s ok
yeah but when you say y can be anything
youre inplying there a y to even be able to be something
why can't y be something?
but there isnt a y so how can nothing be something
.
Lol that's smart but when we plot the graph of x= 1 , we plot the points that satisfies this equation
Does x= 1 and y= 2 satisfy it?
y exists in the first place because of the outside context (not in the equation itself!) that we are working in 2D with (x,y)
if I write it as x+0y=1, are you now happy that "there is y in the equation" ?
isnt the graph tied with the equation
graph = equation + context
yeah 😂
I thought thats what it was initially
but theyre saying no
Well 0*y = 0 right
right
that's why theres no y, but u can leave it as 0*y cuz u like it that way
that's fine
u got it?
ye
yea
so x = 1 - y0
umh ya
No
dude stop u r hurting maths
bro what is this
maths is crying
how am i even able to divide by 0 here
im doing simple algebra
that's apparently not simple algebra
and the equation should hold true
you can solve for x but you can't solve for y here
so how can i graph y
if i cant solve for it
💀
when i say to u to bring me a red apple. And u bring me a red apple and a potato, would that be fine to me?
no because you want an apple?
well it depends
if you dont like potatoes you’re gonna complain
but i get what youre saying though no you’ll be fine lol
😭 lemme give u diff example brother
Suppose you go for a job interview
ok
And they want u to atleast know java language
And u know java and python both
is there any problem?
no
similarly
when i say x=1
i just want x to be 1
I dont give a damn abt y and z
idc what they become
until and unless x is 1 x=1 equation is happy
yea
that's why the graph is a line and not a point
Can u think of how would x=1 would look in 3d?
well for all z and y
itll be 1
the output
for x
yea x would be 1
And what abt y and z
they can be anything right?
now think of the graph of x= 1 (which looks like a straight line in 2d)
yes
yea
like a rectangle
its okay thank you tho
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
can someone please explain this to me
What don’t you understand
You’re gonna have to be a bit more specific
the trace of the surface
and then the circle equation
i dont get how they came up with that the trace of the surface is z = z_0
and idk what z= z_0 is
and idk what happened where they plugged into the circle equation
can you imagine this surface of revolution as a stack of rings?
each of the ring has a different radius, and all those rings are stacked along the z axis
yes and those stack of rings are called traces right
idk, I never heard of the traces thing. But thats not very important here tbh
lets say its called traces ok?
so each of these traces correspond to a specific z coordinate
and are all circles of different radii
so the radius r of such a trace is entirely dependent on the z coordinate
you might as well write the radius as a function of this z coordinate, r(z)
yeah
i see
but then
so you obviously know the equation of a circle very well, its x^2 + y^2 = r^2 when the center is located at x=0 and y=0
how do you come up with all those radii
yes
from the given generating curve
r(z) is something you would need to know to get such a surface of revolution
just like you know what is x, y and z axis, you would also know the r(z) function that tells you the radius at each location
This is the r(z) you need to be given
When you spin that line around the z axis you create a surface of revolution
The surface area of this surface is the goal of these problems
The point is if we know this then we can find the surface area when you spin the curve
i see
like integration?
btw whats a cross section
what you called a trace is cross section
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
No
Well
Normally cross section refers to the cross section of a 3d object (which would be a plane)
But I guess the cross section of a surface would be curves, which are level sets
the surface of revolution forms a boundary of 3d solid
Well you need to integrate this r(z) later to get the surface area so it’s not like integration it is integration
Yes but then the cross section will include the interior not just the boundary, but here the boundary is the trace
everything in the plane of cuting is just the trace in this case, so the trace would be the cross section here
its a surface here, not a solid so the cross section has only the curve
so the circles stacked up?
yeah i meant each one
btw
@odd seal is the equation of the circle here with the radius function plugged in what forms those cross sections or traces? the circles?
for all values of z
i think the screen shot just answered my question
but also
why do they have z_0
and not just z
cause its supposed to be for all values of z right
they are looking at some specific z coordinate with value z_0
i see, btw do we always use the circle equation for this
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
can anyone help me?
yes, post
Ok 1 esc
well i know i can use a graph to complete this quesiton , but i want to know how to read the graphs without using calculator, better for my undersatnding like how can they tell what function complies with whatever graph its so confusing
well here u can use limits
I dont understand that sry
They probably never took calculus.
Ya sry this is pre calc
for eg
for the graph of C(x)
we know as x tends to infinity graph y tneds to 0
we have 2 graphs fulfilling this
and as x tends to 0 the value of y will be -2
and that is only the case with graph (c)
hence the graph of C(x) is option c
sry 😭 i dont take caculus ever
no no limits ain that complicated like how should i put it
For example, we know B works because the graph is undefined at -1.
Do you see how it blows up on both sides?
That's called an asymptote.
well in that case u'll need to find values at particular valies of x and then try to like plot the graph a bit uk
Yes
Sry i don understand much 😭
The others work similarly.
C works the same way. It's undefined at 1.
So it blows up at 1.
For A and D, it's basically the graph of 2/x but they just moved it up or down.
also i have a quesiton , so the 2/x is a horizontal stretch of 1/2?
I think it's better to say a vertical stretch of 2.
yeah i can see
it makes sense now
Same my teacher said that
OK i understand now
Good good.
thanks alot ❤️ 😃
No problem!
are. u a teacher?
Yup.
High school yeah.
Same.
Same lol.
30-1?
Yes
