#help-36
1 messages · Page 170 of 1
Updating limits?
yeah that was that
and
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt 5} , \mathrm dx = 2 \sec \theta \sec \theta \tan \theta , \mathrm d\theta$$
gfauxpas
This seems complex
$$\int_{\arctan(1/5)}^{\arctan((t+1)/\sqrt 5} \frac{2\sqrt 5 \sec^2 \theta \tan \theta , \mathrm d\theta}{1+\tan^2 \theta}$$
hmm what happened
$$\int_{\arctan(1/5)}^{\arctan((t+1)\sqrt 5} 2\sqrt 5 \dfrac{\sec^2 \theta \tan \theta , \mathrm d\theta}{1+\tan^2 \theta}$$
see the problem?
!
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
gfauxpas
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$$\int_{\arctan(1/5)}^{\arctan((t+1)\sqrt 5} 2\sqrt {5} \dfrac{\sec^2 \theta \tan \theta , \mathrm d\theta}{1+\tan^2 \theta}$$
!
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$$\int_{\arctan(1/5)}^{\arctan((t+1)\sqrt 5)} 2\sqrt 5 \dfrac{\sec^2 \theta \tan \theta , \mathrm d\theta}{1+\tan^2 \theta}$$
there we go!
gfauxpas
okay ill skip the rest but
you see how to do it now
in the simple case of
$$\int_0^t \dfrac{\mathrm dx}{x^2 + 1}$$
gfauxpas
Ooh
you get arctan(t) exactly
Cool
Btw
Do u have any tips fo integration?
For*
Solving methods as well as tricks if u know any
School level is enough yk
just, look at a lot of different approaches so youre exposed to new techniques
Closed by @gray mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i was doing this
i solved it and i tried to check my answer but the derivative calculator says its wrong
I mean
twin
just include one x inside the square root
what do we get
include 3x
arcsech(3x)🥀
Welcome to mathcord Licht! 
x multiplied by 3x sqrt (1/9x^2 - 1) = x sqrt(1-9x^2)
hehe ty twin
fellow tensura enthussiast
Well
its -1x^2 not -1
the calculator us tweaking
check
i tried wolfram too but it also gave some weird form
x^2 is outside the square root
your answer and the calculator
ok so the answer i got is correct then ya?
both sre right
Yes
ok i was like triplechecking cuz it was just basic product rule i thought
ok ty thats all then
.close
Closed by @wanton crater
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,calc sqrt(17)^2 + (4 * sqrt(17))^2
Result:
289
,calc 17^2
Result:
289
riemann
,tex .double angle
riemann
i see yes you did
Closed by @coral wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oh we helped you cheat on your test? nice
riemann got manipulated ):
criz might have meant that he used the server to study for the test
having prior knowledge regarding the exam's content is cheating
idk the context so ill step out
The thing they were asking about was definitely already graded so cheating on that seems hard.
studying is doubting your potential 
exactlyyy
Closed by @cyan kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Hello 
This channel is closed. Please claim an open one.
Okay
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
dont ping helpers immediately
😭
!15mins
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Frr
if you need to turn degrees you have to divide that pi
and basically numerator should be 180 degrees
what?
[Your number]* (180 degree/pi)
14*180degrees/pi ?
14/9 * 180/pi
your pi..
$\frac{14\pi }{9}*\frac{180}{\pi}$
Sarin
Be sure to add ° symbol yea
put it in reverse
180/pi ---> pi/180 degrees
huh?
so that degrees cancels out
@kindred cove do you know how to do unit conversions generally?
like between m and km, or minutes and seconds, or feet and inches
$280 degrees \cdot \frac{pi}{\180i}$
\cdot for multiplication btw
yea
.close
.close
Closed by @kindred cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
is .close
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
😢ok
thx both of you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I thought this was gonna be easy until I saw F wasn’t completing a triangle
ABCD is a parallelogram?
Yes
find the value of x?
How do you have EB ?
notice that DF is the height of the parallelogram dropped from D
there's no need for pythagoras here
First I did Pythagoras on ADE then I know DC =AB so I just subtracted
Hm?
do you notice the idea?
U mean DE
DE and DF are both heights of the parallelogram
How
it's just they have different bases
yeah
there's a simple idea here we can use
what is the formula for area of a parallelogram?
Idk I haven’t memorized that but I probably should
you really should
Oh it’s really simple
otherwise this is gonna get a little complex with similar triangles and stuff
alr now you should be able to find x easily
yeah
Dang
Does that means rectangles have 2 different heights too?
And triangles
Some
triangles have 3
Not all right
An equilateral one has 1 height
Well 3 heights with the same value
they have 3 but they have the same length
yea switching between heights and bases is what they use to torture 5th graders here
Where do you live
vietnam
Wdym switching between heights and bases
exactly
Lowkey isn’t even hard I just didn’t know about the concept
Gonna need a translation
Even with translation I can’t do it though so
Save your fingers
😔

no problem
.close
Closed by @nocturne cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
property of even functions
dang yeah I never learned that
$\int_{-a}^a f(x) \dd{x} = 2\int_0^a f(x) \dd{x}$
knief
knief
yea
Closed by @quasi plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
9 - x² da y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32 9 - x² y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (X4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x -x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) 9 - x² produce y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V =230
9 - x² da y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32 9 - x² y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (X4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x -x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) 9 - x² produce y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V =230
9 - x² da y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32 9 - x² y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (X4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x -x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) 9 - x² produce y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V =230
9 - x² da y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32 9 - x² y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (X4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x -x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) 9 - x² produce y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V =230
9 - x² da y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32 9 - x² y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (X4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x -x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) 9 - x² produce y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V =230
9 - x² da y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32 9 - x² y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (X4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x -x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) 9 - x² produce y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx19 V = x [-x-12 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V = π12 (x4-18x² + 81) - (x² + 14x + 49) dx V = pi / 12 (x4 - 19x2 - 14x + 32) dx 19 V = x [-x-12x3-7 y = x + 79 - x² = x + 7 x = 1 y x = -2 V = π112 (9-x2) ² - (x + 7) 2dx V =230
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone know how even functions work on a table?
This table for example
okay so x values always give same y value, signs don’t change
yeah because its symmetrical
and then for odd funcs it’s just both signs flip?
f(-x)=f(x)
yea f(x)=-f(x)
all that this means is if u put in -x u have same result as u would for x
wait inthibk i weotr that wrong
yes thats even
and then this f(-x)=-f(x)?
okayy
$odd: f(-x)=-f(x) , even: f(-x)=f(x)$
qimmah
got ittt, that’s what I thought it was
And then just apply this same idea when given tables
or ig it’s just visual on tables
yup
yes and in graphs
evens are symmetric along the y-axis
whilst odds are symmetric along the origin
so just look for a 180 rotation in odds?
yes
Closed by @coral wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just want work checked
qimmah
btw in the third integral i wrote 1+a^2 instead of (1+a)^2 by mistake
Seems correct
Last line-closing bracket is missing
integrating techniques be messin me up
thanks
.close
Closed by @dapper hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@dapper hull
Did u consider 1/(1+a)² as v?
no dv
Why tho
idk felt like it
felt the integral of ln(a) is a little messy for the working
just did it and alna-a is in the f'g integral lol
Wdym
simply it made things messier
Well it did make me confused
But that step was cool
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im baacckkk
how do i do this?
doesnt look too hard im just confused where on the line i plot the points
anyone know how these work?
match up the x values with the endpoints. then use the function to find the y values at these endpoints
wait do i have to do real math or can i just read the formulas and plot points
yes, the math you are doing is over the real numbers so it's real math 
no i mean do i have to solve equations or are the answers in the formula
sorry. no equations, just subbing in the x-values into the proper part of the function
how do i know what formula is what line
second is the straight line im assumiung
first is red?
makes sense, because straight lines are constants
idk what the square root means thats whats confusing
well, look at the slope of the red and blue lines
out of x^3 and sqrt(x), which do you think would have the steeper slope? i.e. which one increases quicker?
i might just get it wrong and get a new question
i only have 1 attempt and im not confident at all
i think you've nearly got this one, if you're not sure i can walk you through it a bit
tbh i have to do this whole module in one day and ive literally done 7 hours of math so far
my brain is cooked
its hard to think
i have 2 more units to do and i have 2 hours
and the next unit is so complex its nauseating
my advice would be to take a break, let the math simmer in the back of your mind, then hopefully your intuition will be a little better to finish it off
but idk your life and im not your dad
i cant i just took an hour and a half break and 2 hours for 2 units is cutting close on the place i have been on
so just explain things more indepth and laymans term-like i guess
not trying to trauma dump my day lol just need a little more help
no fair enough
these functions are elementary enough that i'll just show you some, hang on
i just dont understand what each section of the formula correlates too
for the line one do i put it flat on negative 2?
yes, flat, because it's a constant line
if you had -2x, it can vary in height, because x is a variable
the red one is x^3, and the blue one is sqrt(x)
are red and blue right?
if you make purple flat thats my best attempt
BRO I HAD THE WHOLE THING RIGHT AND BLUE IS ONE POINT OFF
fuck math
it like follows a line
red looks correct, but your blue starts at 2 instead of 4
yea i got it wrong sadly
oh that helps
yeah, because x >= 4, your sqrt(x) line should start at 4
does sqrt(x) include the endpoint, and why?
idk what u mean
yea honestly its just hard to think with that many variables right now
i like step 1 2 3 kinda math
the endpoint on sqrt(x) (the blue), is that included or not?
yea blue was supposed to be 4
yea if they are holo or whole
but ik thats if its equals to or not
i have to predict what this looks like
ok W just checking
i think it would be best to mess around with this graph first and get a feel for which lines are which
oh i forgot constant lines. eh you know them
yea its not helpful i think im using it wrong
im on a time crunch
i got it qright
my fucking mortal enemy
what do i do if its just x < 0
this ones more complicated ngl
3 is purple
do i start on 0?
is it infinity
what’ the value of x^2-2 when x=0?
-2?
So you know the red parabola has the open endpoint at (0,-2)
closed to include -2
huh
open end point is just hollow circle that implies that point is not included
now what is the minimum y value, x^2-2 can take
bro i really want to just give u the answers since ur so tight on time LMAO
not correct
which ones wrong
parabolla ok, but blue and purple should not overlap
is purple right?
no
kinda educated guess on blue
im just gonna explain piecewise fucntions to u lmk if u dont understand
so you know how the functions are f(x), and f(x) is just a y value that you get after plugging a x value in
wtf do i do when its not giving me 2 points
basically in your case the problems are giving you some ez functions to plot piecewise funcions, what u r doing is just plotting the actual functions except, on the right of the functions there is a domain, which is the restriction of the given functions
lwk might just get this wrong its been 20 minutes and im not any closer
so simple words u r just plotting the functions in the giving restriction and erasing it if its not inside the domain
just draw the function in the domain, and deterine if endpoints are included by looking at inequality sign
i have 2 end points and only 1 number
thats all im confused about atm
i appreciate the help
so for example f(x) = 1 just means y=1, so its just a horizontal line, and the domain is x>4, so u r just plotting y=1 starting at x = 4 and its going to the right cuz its increasing
^ does this make sense
is that not what purple is rn?
and its not included because x is greater than 4 and not greater and equals to 4
or is purple supposed to be blue
im so lost what do i do with the other point then
like its in between the x-values 0 to 4, its supposed to be greater than 4 so it starts at 4 and goes to the right cuz x coordinate starts increasing going to the right
just drag it off the scren im assuming...
@dense badge am i getting something wrong its just f(x)=1 starting at x=4 going to the right forever no?
now what do with purple
no you good
i’m just not a fast typer
point not included because its not greater AND equals, its just greater
i did that
x+1 0<x<4
x+1 is slope?
yes
its not just x+1, its f(x)=x+1 and only "exists" between 0 and 4
it’s x+1 for the interval [0,4]
yes
and the points are included because x can be equal to 0 and 4
correct?
almost
look at inequality sign
and blue is NOT included
because it will not be equal to 4
cuz x>4 not x>=4
what’s x+1 when you plug x=0?
bingo
💀
blud next time just wait for us to finish typing
is there next problem? u dont have muhc time left right
what’s x^2-2 at x=-1?
he finished the problem and got it wrong already 💀 hes showing the answer key to us
this one is ez if u undestood what i was saying to u just compare the graphs
is it b
i can give u a hint look at the y interceptss
bc 2x-3 is slope and y
thats right answwer but gimme a better explanation than this
cuz idk wut u r trying to say
uh -3 is the y and 2x is the slope
and the other 4 are wrong for that line
process of elimination
yes -3 is the y intercept
rut row
start with the constant function
try it first so we can help u
which one do u think is the NOT striaght line of the 3
whats the domain
-2?
check the end points
its either -1,-1 1,1 0,0
and u get the right y-values by plugging the x values
1,1?
idk what ur trying to say
what’s -x^3 when x=-2?
best attempt
go do the other 2 first they r slightly easier
again you can’t have overlap the function f(x) can only spit out one output for each x input
ok then just chill for a sec and let us explain
i dont htink u r listening u r just placing random stuff on the graph, think abt the domain first, which x-values does the graph "exist"/reside in
all the lines i placed i used like basic logic its not like im just guessing at random
think abt which x-values they start at
this say f(x) outputs x+2 when x is less than -2
x+2 is the slope and the y intercept thats why purple is where it is and 3 is the y so its straight so i just slapped it on 3
thats the way im thinking about it
im 8 hours into this math session my brain is soup its hard to understand new concept
try to explain it
just anxious asf i planned on being done with this 20 minutes ago
im for sure not finishing both in time
you will finish on time if the rest r just easy equation algebra solving problems dw its just hard to help with grpah plotting problems without drawing
x+2 is equation, u draw it starting at x=-2 and it goes to the left because its values r smaller than -2
is this part ok?
beacuse it tells u x < -2
the graph of f(x), the curve you try to draw is the set of points of the form (x,f(x))
here f(x) is defined by part meaning different range of x different procedure to get the output
so for x<-2 f(x) is computed by adding 2 to x
x<-2
just look at this graph u r just drawing the shaded area
so for instance if x=-3 f(x)=-3+2=-1 is on the curve
it shouldnt be this diffivcult
its fine i undestand u r like low on time and youve been wokring for too long so just try to do as fast as u can and finish so u can take a break
the time constraint is impeding you from understanding sadly
its like IXL it resets you if you get it wrong
i just wanted to watch the video explanation and it reset me
i didnt even get to answer
ok just skip it for now then ig and do this one
honestly this makes me feel like i have down syndrome like i take upper division classes and destroy them and then this shit kills me
its so frustrating
92 in anatomy and i cant do graphs
allg u r just stressedcuz ur running out of time
looks good
im doing inverse functions
well
idk why but the inverse function unit was 4 questions
I have 50 minutes to slay this fucking titan
explain away i have time now
this is the last question
u will definitely efel better
bro wants closure
yes which is y i want our explanation to actually make sense to u
ok
what’s f(4)?
welcomeback
purple starting point is good and endpoint is correct
however your slope is not correct
whats the slope of f(x)=x+2?
easy fix: blue not high enough
its 1/1 because x is not getting multiplied by any number
oh mb i meant to put it on 3
attempt 2
is it right?
i refuse to lose progress atp
sweet
thank you
longest 9 hours of my whole life omg
im gonna play the game and destroy my cart now
.close
Closed by @hollow hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.










w closure
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the answer says each triangle is 1/4 of the square but without assuming that the top vertex is at the centre of the square how would we figure that out?
well it is not assuming that the top vertex is the center
it can be proved that the top vertex IS the center
how do we do that?
um, kinda hard to explain without drawing
could you draw it :>
the thing is, if you can prove that so example this triangle is a 90,45,45 triangle, then it is easier to see
ohh wait it bisects that corner right
i think i get it
yeah
Closed by @fresh basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there's a hint
but how can i find the radical axis of these 2 circles
maybe i constructed it wrong because we need AQ' to be tangent to the circle Q'RS
idk im confused
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
Do you know the radical axis of intersecting circles?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not getting any real solutions for x
yeah
oh wait i didnt flip the sign on the log term
yeah i looked on wolframalpha and it has no real sols
damn
maybe the question writer wanted a - instead of a + before the log
hmm
that gives me cbrt(10000)
but the options are 100, 10, 1 and 1/sqrt(10)
they probably made a mistake somewhere else im not gonna dwell on it
thanks
.close
Closed by @novel kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given the function f(x,y)= from the image above for x,y /= 0,0
and f(x,y)=0 for x,y=0
study its continuity
the usual argument when discussing continuity is to take limits at the problematic points (in this case, x = y = 0)
if any limit where x,y approaches 0,0 equals f(0,0), then the function is continuous
ok
since this is in two dimensions, you don't have a "left hand limit" and a "right hand limit"
there's infinitely many ways (x,y) can approach (0,0)
you either have to find a counterexample where the limit doesn't equal f(0,0) (i.e. the function is discontinuous)
or prove that it equals f(0,0) for every limit (i.e. the function is continuous at that point)
how do i prove it for every limit
Along x axis , it's 0
you need epsilon-delta
as in approaching from every possible angle?
Polar
Mhm
Well if along line it's 0
Then ofc polar!?
I mean you could take r costheta and r sintheta
But what next?
x=costheta
y=sintheta
R tends to 0?
that's still not enough, you also need to prove it for paths that are not a straight line
Uh wait
like y = x^2
Along the line it's zero
so the only way is eplsion delta ?
Y = mx try
yep
I'm interested in your polar suggestion
that undefined
this isn't sufficient
the denominator is r^2
I was in middle of writing
yeah sorry
this is what i did too but i do not know if it is correct
Then limit exists fr
this isn't enough to say that the limit exists
Function must be continuous at (0,0)
Why can't you?
let's take another function as an example
g(x,y) = 1 if y = x^2 and 0 otherwise
At f(0,0) it is 0 right?
what's the limit of this function as (x,y) approaches (0,0)?
@fossil plaza you have the answer?
of what ?
Question
if you are talking about this then no
By my method you could absolutely say that the function is continuous at origin
by your method, this limit exists
but it doesn't
We had (r,theta) → 0
i mean it is a singularity but the limit does exist
if you approach it along any straight line path, the limit is 0
but if you approach it along y = x^2, the limit is 1
so the limit doesn't exist for the function i gave as an example
ohh i see than that is correct
The function is bounded to go zero bro
Go along y = 0 path
Then limit is zero
Go along x
Still zero
But in this
We can't bound the function
But with my method
The function goes zero as it is bound
|f(x,y)| ≤ r² → 0
my point is you can't make a conclusion just by testing every straight line path
i'm not talking about the original function
Oh
As r → 0
This is absolutely correct tho
Since the function is bound
you need to use epsilon-delta if you want that to be rigorous
Idk what 8k doing wrong
Bro but what's wrong with my method?
Wait then
Let's try epsilon delta
the limit of f(x,y) as (x,y) approaches (a,b) is L if and only if
for every epsilon > 0
there exists a delta > 0
such that if 0 < |f(x,y) - L| < epsilon
then 0 < |(x,y)-(a,b)| < delta
this is epsilon-delta
if you can prove this for L = 0 and (a,b) = (0,0), then f(x,y) is continuous at (0,0)
0 < √x²+y² < epsilon
that's for delta
epsilon is the upper bound for the distance between the function's value and the limit
other way around; 0 < |f(x,y) - L| < epsilon should imply 0 < |(x,y)-(a,b)| < delta
.close
Closed by @fossil plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
I used another definition for topology generated by a basis, though I found myself more clear with it but I am unsure if my current approach is correct and whether it’s more clearer
It felt more constructive this way
@blissful zenith Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.
Im getting this as (tan theta)/2
And not tan (theta/2)
Nah im getting getting either of those
How do we get tan theta/2 here?
.close
Closed by @summer lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, i think im supposed to use the intermediate value theorem but im not sure about that
any hint will be wonderful
but just hint not full ans
btw i made g(x)=f(x)+x and ik its continous between [-1,1]
can i just say that becuz of IVT there must be a g(0)..? i think it aint much
Kinda
we have to prove that there exist g(x) that is positive and negative
No information on its monotonie?
so i thought abt this
cuz 0 is between [-1,1]
well g is in between -2 and 2
-1 <= x <= 1
-1 <= f(x) <= 1
-2 <= g(x) <= 2
Just check g(x) at endpoints
And use IVT
Not necessarily
f(x) could be 1 when x is -1
yep
but this is still true, no?
That's one case
this is all the cases
Actually not.
This works fine
Nope
Yeah
if u consider all possible g max(g(x)) is 2 and min(g(x)) = -2
can you explain a lil bit
You know ivt right
Calculate g(1) and g(-1)
Try to deduce something from that
Yeah, if we consider all possible cases.
so whats wrong 
.
@terse crypt sothen i cant assume that there must be g(c)<0 g(a)>0 for example and then say that g has a root by IVT
You can but not for that specific case
That case sorts it out by itself
but g cant be always positive or negative cuz then there was no g(0)
Did you do this?
yep not sure what to do with that..
alright so you have g(-1) = f(-1) -1
yeh and g1 = f1 +1
ok g(1) must be positive and g(-1) must be negative is it right
gg then
Closed by @round cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,,\int \frac{3}{(1-x)(1+x^2)},dx
!
,,3=\frac{A}{1-x}+\frac{Bx+c}{1+x^2}
!
what "help" do you need exactly?
And i got $A=B=C=\frac{3}{2}$
seems like you know what to do
!
My ans is diff from book
Ye
what answer did you get? (i'm too lazy to infer)
Ye
which there is but
Its const is 3/2
integrals give you a family of curves
We multiply num and denom by 2
they could have different forms
So we take 3/4 as common get that extra 2 in square of 1-x
the answer here is the correct answer
why do you say that your answer doesn't match when you haven't solved it
okay sure
be sure not to miss any algebraic manipulation stuff
that could lead to an incorrect solution
Have u read previous msgs?
Ohh
,w integrate 3/[(1-x)(1+x^2)] dx
lets check the decom
I got +2
it depends on if you're working in (-infinity,1) or (1,infinity)
you need log|x-1| anyway
if you're working in (1,infinity)
Uhh nothing is specified like that yk
oh ic ic
(x-1)^2 = (1-x)^2
so as long as you keep that square
you're fine
So mines right?
we'll check the coeffs you got
Closed by @gray mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yeah
integral of 1/(1-x), as we said
is - integral of 1/(x-1)
which is -log|x-1|
so -log(1-x) if you have x < 1
Yes
check back that
-log(1-x) differentiates into - (-1)/(1-x) = 1/(1-x)
(derivative of log u = u'/u)
.reopen
✅
integral is supposed to be the "inverse" of derivative
you need to come up with a function that IS the derivative of your original integrand
so when you tell me that 1/(1-x) integrates into log(1-x)
allow me to have my doubts
Ooh ye
Ye i got it noe
Now*
Ye i have one more like dis
,,\int \frac{\cos x}{(1-\sin x)(2-\sin x)}, dx
!
Closed by @gray mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@vital kelp Has your question been resolved?
@vital kelp Has your question been resolved?
@vital kelp I might be wrong, but if I'm recalling my group theory right, then {5^2 * 7^2, 3^2 * 5 * 7} is isomorphic to {3^2, 5, 5^2, 7, 7^2} by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, and similarly {3^2 * 5^2 * 7, 5 * 7^2} is also isomorphic to {3^2, 5, 5^2, 7, 7^2}. So 1 and 2 are isomorphic. However 1 and 3 are not, because {3, 3} is not isomorphic to {3^2}.
Sure, notice that 1 had a subgroup of order 9, but 3 does not.
They're both isomorphic to the same group {3^2, 5, 5^2, 7, 7^2}
by decomposition via the chinese remainder theorem
yes, and this is what I did
{5^2 * 7^2, 3^2 * 5 * 7} = Z_{5^2 * 7^2} x Z_{3^2 * 5 * 7} = Z_{5^2} x Z_{7^2} x Z_{3^2 * 5 * 7}
Z_{5^2} x Z_{7^2} x Z_{3^2 * 5 * 7} = Z_{5^2} x Z_{7^2} x Z_{3^2} x Z_{5} x Z_{7}
= {3^2, 5, 5^2, 7, 7^2}
Closed by @vital kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @shrewd yew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i just figured out what i did wrong while rereading it 😭 😭 😭
it's alright at least you got it on your own 😭

