#help-36
1 messages · Page 161 of 1
By definition
largest factor smaller than root n < root n < smallest factor bigger than root n
So you didnt need to include that
lol yeah
Anyways it seems like you got the idea but this proof is quite unreadable for me
So, to clarify. Let $n \in \bN$ be a natural number. We define $f^-_n(k)$ as the number of factors of $n$ less than $k$, and $f^+_n(k)$ as the number of factors of $n$ greater than $k$. Let $k \in \bR$ be a real number such that $f^-_n(k) = f^+_n(k)$. Let $p \in \bN$ be a factor of $n$ such that $p < k$. Prove $n > pk$.
Shuba
yes
If p is a factor of n, then n/p is also a factor of n. What can we say about n/p?
remember, k is right in the middle of all the factors of n.
n/p >= root(n)
Yes.
Can you prove it?
What does that mean for k?
p < root(n)
1/root(n) < 1/p
root(n) < n/p
Well the greatest factor lesser than sqrt(n) < k < smallest factor bigger than sqrt(n)
yep, you're an the right track
the smallest factor bigger than sqrt(n) <= n/p
Here's what you need to do.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Let $k = \sqrt{n}$.
\item Prove $f^-_n(k) = f^+_n(k)$.
\item Prove $$\forall p \in \bN .; p | n \implies p < k \implies n/p > k \implies n > pk$$
\end{enumerate}
Shuba
Let us know if you want more help with either of these steps 🙂
What does => mean
implies
Point 3, in english, is "for all p, p is a factor of n where p < k implies n/p > k implies `n > pk".
let k = root(n) ?
I've bungled the maths in that TeXit a bit. Sorry. I think you understand what you need to do though
Yep. We want to find a k such that the number of factors of n less than k equals the number of factors of n greater than k. A good candidate for this is k = root(n). Now, we need to prove the indeed meets the criteria for k.
Then, once we've verified k, we can show if any factor p < k, then n/p > k
@raw merlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
wherever delta x is zero for that time v is also zero
you're pinged already so grrr the average velocity from 0 to t where it is zero is the point where the secant line is parallel to x axis
i think
in this case tfinal is where you find the delta x as zwerro or two same x values
but that is instanttaneous
notice that if the average velocity is zero, then what must the xposition be
!nosols
im talkinbout the av
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
okae
no instantanenous is the tangent line
for this instance
starting from 0 to a random point on the curve
find the secand
parallel to x axis
(which is again, close to 10 seconds)
vro
no no im just v(av) = delta x/deltaT
could you at least spoil that??
BUT THAT IS INSTANTANEOUS
HOWW
naww
the tangent at any point to the curve represents the dx/dt or inst v
It isn't.
@sage meteor Please put your suspected answer in spoilers.
What is the secant line can u explain I’ve never heard of this before (or I didn’t pay attention in my calc lectures)
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
yeaa exactly wherever ||the secand is parallel to x axis but @sage meteor that would mean the exact same thing as what i said where delta x = zero since they both lie along the same line which has slope zero||
how to
please tell
okay whatever, same same
line joining two points on a curve
that's all
Yes
like in teh diagram
Thx
@tulip atlas Has your question been resolved?
@tulip atlas Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,, A_n^k \cdot A_b^c = A_{n+b}^{k+c}
<rajel />
is this always correct
A in probabilites , forgot what it was called
but it goes $A_n^k = \frac{n!}{(n-k)!}$
<rajel />
this is usually called nPk in english
for permutation
anyway this looks sus though
i can tell you this is wrong for at least one set of values
.close
Closed by @distant scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1001000100001.....
Is this an irrational number
did you mean 0.1001000100001.... ?
if so, then yes
all rational numbers have (eventually) periodic expansion
this doesnt have eventually periodic expansion
therefore it's not rational
No, 1001000100001.....
(that or its decimal expansion terminates)
thats not any number
(aka eventually periodic 0)
You're asking about a whole number with infinitely many digits?
yea
I wouldn’t say that’s enough info to decide
anti-2adic
thereis a pattern
I see we've finally found the maths equivalent of "anti spiral"
But assuming this is just a whole number, then... well it's a whole number so it's rational
It's a functionally useless number quand-même, but still
A pattern isn’t necessarily enough
oh
good
why
One example
A pattern is there but still it’s not rational
bruh
hold on though like what is this even supposed to mean
you're gonna have to explain to us peons what your "integer but the digits go infinitely to the left" notation means
how a pattern implies rationality
a periodic pattern implies rationality
but not this
and again, this isnt even a number
"pattern" doesn't really have a mathematical meaning in this context
we are specifically looking for blocks of repeating digits
which, again, brings us to the main point: what do YOU mean with this notation?
not like theres an interpretation with a finite answer
It is an infinite sum like 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + .....
= -1/12
which is rational
thats just not how any of that works
... well ok then can you spell out your infinite sum for us in more conventional, non-genius-friendly notation?
also yeah no. cut it with the -1/12 BS.
until you do this, we'll just have to assume this is either a gloat or an ego-stroke.
you're saying zero point 1 followed by 2 zeroes, then a 1 followed by 3 zeroes, etc. (generally a 1 followed by n zeroes)?
read the channel. no he does not mean that
ah did not load fully for me, sorry :)
Idk if it's a joke or not, but 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... diverges. It's certainly not -1/12
shhhhh he's clearly ramanujan II /s
@last cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @last cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know any google lassroom codes for stem groups
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Uhhh this isn't what help channels are for
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@vague token Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @vague token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this right?
this seems like an economics question
flour gets more expensive and bread gets cheaper as a result?
It is! 🙂
Wait yeah what
Hold up
So it’s A
I’m loosing it sorry on 3 hours of sleep
if you have cheaper flour, you get more bread and cheaper bread
the movement of equilibrium point described by the question is a result of shift left of demand
Yes
Thank you
I don't actually know any economics, but this is the only reasonable answer to me 
Thank you guys so much
an increase in the price of rye bread shouldn't make white bread cheaper, I feel? 
Yes I did A and it was right
there'd be more demand for it, but like
Yes and it would be a demand thing
Yup

more demand but not more supply, so the price of white bread should go up too
mhm
(maybe not as much as rye)
Closed by @lost sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the underlined ones 😭 except for the first one, i alr get that
just the next perfect square + why c =/= 1,2,4,5
@storm haven Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
c=/=2 and c=/=5 is cause its always increasing (there is no square residue 2 mod 3)
for the next perfect square it was the mod 3 reasoning as yesterday
at least one of $(\sqrt{c}+d)^2)$ must be 0 mod 3 for $d \in {1,2,3}$
no way gci reference??
lol whats gci
ok wished too much
grass cutting ubcremental, one of the characters is called grassman
lol my name is just from the cryptids 
I dont really get it tbh
What's the matter?
Here, i dont understand the 2nd underlined one
I understand everything else
A sequence is a pattern of numbers
Arithmetic progression is a + (n-1)d
This is about continuity
That's why we take c to be an input on real line
Breaking things down like this will help
didnt it say integers??
its fine, i understand the basics
justt the underlined things in the first picture
Sorry
yep its fine
In the question, the taken variable C, representing function A0 is greater than 1 and since the questions caps at 3, there can't be any number greater than 3 or less than 0
So 0, 1 and 4 is out of question
sorry for the late reply
i donnt understand how they got the next square after c
the (floor(root(c)) + 1)^2
oh, and what do you mean by "the question caps at 3"
Guys ping me if reply
Mod 3 means 0 to 3
Oh yeah
Since A0 is less than 1, we get 2 or 3
It's in the question. Probably a variable relating to 0
a is the variable for arithmetic progression
yeah
0 is subscript yes
Note
huh
We don't have to define the sequence, it is already defined in the question
So first check for continuity
i just need to know where this comes from
what "continuity"?
F(c) = Lim x -> c f(x)
huh
how will that be relevant?
to the next square
plus doesnt contunuity only work for reals? we are working with integers here
You have to check whether they approach from the left hand limit and right hand limit and f(c) is the same .-.
Continuity works for even trigonometric functions
I believe
ofc 💀
cause trig works over the reals
this sequence works over integers
Oh
well, can you just explain where this comes from?
It's true that integers are discontinuous
So we don't have to find continuity lol
yep
err, @brittle breach could you just explain this?
thats all i need, no continuity or other things
Yes
The periodicity of 3 is the repetition of a_n + 3
Sure
Lol
Since we add 3 repeatedly, it will raise up to infinity
hmmm, if it never hits a square right?
as in, a_0 is 2 mod 3?
if it hits a square, it wont blow up
It will never hit a square
huh??
how about 3-> 6-> 9
it hits a square?
or did you mean the a_0 = 2 mod 3 case?
Yes
in the paragraph with the circled things, they assum a_0 =/= 2 mmod 3
That means when we don't consider 2, the perfect squares would be the squares of sqroot. C + 1, 2, and 3
yes, but why
Which is a logical way to calculate since we already coined that it can never hit a square
but it wont hit a square if and only if a_0 is 2 mod 3, but they assumed a_0 is not 2 mod 3?
wait normie, i dont understand you
So if we use it as 3 itself
waiittt
Here's the main catch
reply to mmy message
3 itself will give you the perfect square I guess
well, reply to this?
can you elaborate on this? Wont it have to hit a square if a_0 is not 2 mod 3?
If it's using 2 in mod 3, it would never hit a square. But likelihood of hitting a square increases if we use 3 in mod 3, as in those places you underlined
yesh
so, how did they derive the "next sqyare" thing that i circled
i dont get it still..
You mean how they get there?
It's simple, it's a logical method. When using 3 which is the only remaining value, canceling out 0, 1 and 2, we now add constants 1 , 2 and 3 to square root of a_n and find their perfect squares by squaring them
Determine all the values of a_0 for which there is a number X such that a_n = X for infinitely many values of n
That's the real question
umhm, yes.
and i understand the proof except for 1 thing
i just mneed the "next square" thing
thats it
Here's some reasoning
When we find a perfect square there like you reasoned earlier, the sequence is smaller
ok, i get it
When we don't find a perfect square there, then the sequence will become larger to reach the perfect square
yes
Can also lead to infinity
mmhmmm
So there you have it
??
how do you derive tthe next square with that?
(floor(root(c)) + 1)^2
or 1 can be 2 or 3
hmm, why?
If an is a perfect square
oh ofc
👍 ill wait for ur immage / typing
a_n+1 = a_n + 3 = 0 (mod 3)
why?
Now consider when an is 0 or 1
wait, isnt this false?
3 + 1 =/= 3 + 3 mod 3
in the case a_n = 3
For A to repeat infinitesimally
We need a cycle
For that, we need to consider that an is NOT a perfect square
i dont understand
Then it would increase by Y, Y + 3, Y + 6, Y + 9
sorry, @brittle breach its been like 2 hours and weve been getting nowhere
Sorry, X
i think ill just close the help channel
.close
it feels like what your saying is wrong,
Not my channel
.close
Closed by @storm haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused here it says we set z = to some constant + or - C but earlier it said C>0 or is this only for x^2 + y^2 = C and not x^2 + y^z - z^2??
they are different surfaces
first one:
[ x^2 + y^2 - z^2 = 1]
second one:
[ x^2 + y^2 = z = f(x,y)]
k
Closed by @sonic crystal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
so im coding
in a random number generator
its used for a rng game
so set ranint(1;100000)
and given the chances of 20 identity
which the chances goes as 1/2n
and i have to find the between value for each
entity
nvm i got it now
ty yall
.close
Closed by @hallow fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have two variables: z_geometry and z_field. z_field is located at z = a, and z_geometry is at z = -a. E is the electric field z component. Is my reasoning right here? I wanna get E(z_geometry) in terms of E(z_field). (also assume E(-z) = -E(z), electric field points upward at z = a and downward at z = -a, z_geometry = -z_field).
If this line is correct and ur assumption is correct
Then you're right
Idt i have enough info here to check if your first line is correct
z_geometry = -z_field
i forgot to add that
wait nvm i added it
what's missing?
the E-field direction?
Hm idk wait for a different helper am not sure about this
are these supposed to be boundary conditions?
wdym?
@tough shard Has your question been resolved?
You can ping @Helpers now if you wish
If E Z geometry is - E Z field. Then E - Z field is E Z field.
But it looks like if your image held true then at the second step, something must have already been calculated
@tough shard
Shouldn't there be a negative sign on line 4?
How do we know when the second line is incorrect
since E(z_geometry) point downward, E(z_field) points upward
why is it incorrect
E(z) is an odd function
OK so we don't use basic algebra methodologies here?
= E (z field)
Minus cancels minus so there is no more minus behind E
yea but, at the fourth step, E(z_field) points upward, E(z_geometry) points downward, so we can't have E(z_geometry) = E(z_field), we gotta include a minus sign, don't you think so? Like we included a minus sign at the first step
@tough shard Has your question been resolved?
@tough shard Has your question been resolved?
@tough shard Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tough shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i simplify this / why is the answer 1
Hmmm a method we can use is take it as x
And cube it
So x³ is this expression cubed
i'd say
take those two as a and b
and use the formula for (a+b)^3
basically what you said
@raw escarp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @raw escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So for part (c) here, I thought of something but I need help making it rigorous
If you have a point x (irrational) in F, then it would be possible to find rationals a and b such that a < x < b, but due to the construction of O, there would be open intervals around a and b and these intervals would engulf the irrationals around x too, and thus x must be isolated?
drawing not to scale
@gritty solar Has your question been resolved?
jan you have a dirty mind
sorry the image has a striking resemblance to my face i feel called out
Why'd x be isolated? What if the intervals contain x? What if there is some rational closer to x whose interval contains it?
I mean we choose x so that that doesn't happen
If it's possible for O to be perfect, then you cant always choose such x
If it was possible to be perfect then why would there be a second part to the question 
I guess it would depend on the ennumeration chosen
indeed
But say for a specific ennumeration it doesn't work
i think that some enumerations will lead to non-perfect F and some to perfect
your goal is finding examples of both
I need to actually find ennumerations for Q then?
i think so
thats a good question
well I would try making just one isolated point
say sqrt2
any irrational will work
Okay
now the enumeration can be almost arbitrary, except for when the rationals are close to sqrt2. Youll have to carefuly work with those and make sure that you never get too close to sqrt2 with the intervals
basically the enumeration of rationals will contain more and more points closer and closer to sqrt2 the further you go
and somewhere inbetween, youll just add the remaining rationals
I'd think that if a rational is 1/2^n away from sqrt(2) then let it have an eps-nbhd of that size
But we can't do that from both sides
Wait lowkey if we just
Oh no
that wouldn't work
Because of the closure property of Q
😔
you techniically can
one rational from below, one rational from above, one random rational, one rational from below, one rational from above, one random rational...
haha
as long as you can carefully enumerate the rationals from below, from above and all the remaining randoms (which is simple), then you can just use the enumeration above
Okay, I'll have to devise a system to do that
Okay, let's say we're looking at sqrt(2) and for the sake of this proof we only focus on [1, 2]
We can map 1 --> 2, and 2 --> 3
so the interval cuts to [1.25, 1.875]
now map 1.25 --> 4 and 1.875 --> 5
like that?
I feel like some axiom of choice bullshit might come up here
that could work, but you'd be leaving lots of rationals behind
which might not be that much of an issue actually
Q is countable
oh nvm it is an issue
the problem is that you'll then need to somehow enumerate all those rationals
who cares ennumerate them however
which you didnt enumerate in here. And the ones which are close to sqrt(2) cant be enumerated arbitrarily (arbitrary enumeration would make some of them have intervals overlapping with sqrt2)
and the ones close to sqrt2 will overlap with it
yeah
so like
we slowly back track
😭
thats why i said this
Yeah, the question is how exactly do we use choice
oh and we will also need to make sure that sqrt2 is actually isolated
i.e. that we have O everywhere around it
that's probably the easier part
"Pick an ennumeration such that sqrt(2) is isolated therefore it is isolated by construction"

Who cares if it exists lol
can I come back to this in about 20 minutes? I'll ping you
i gtg as well for 5 mins, ill try coming up with sth after that
@gritty solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gritty solar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I confirmed my answer with differentiation short cut
they dont igve the same
answer
are you sure that f is even
missed that mistake earlier when looking over it
oh did i mess q1?
which one
uhhh i haven’t finish reading so idk if it’s relevant to the next parts
did i forget the bracket again
all good, lmk when ur done
sorry for the delay, but first principles is the definition of derivative right?
like the limit definition
im assuming you are confused on part b?
sign issue mentioned in part a)
() issue in part b) and wrong expansion
if you are confused on part b it is because you expanded 4(t+h)^2 wrong, should've gotten 8th as second term in numerator
my apologies
read the question wrong
@timber plume Has your question been resolved?
did i get al of them right this time
the one in red highlight is all part of Qd
wait 8t +1 is nto
yep, but you wrote -1/17 under (c) instead of -1/15
not equal to 8t-1
oh i missed that ._.
i noticed that rn haha
definitely sub f(t+h) using brackets, you expanded -(t+h) = -t+h
and f(t) isn't -f(-t)
I cant spot it, do u mind if you could screenshot it
$(t+h)^2 = t^2 + 2th \red{+h^2}$
ℝαμOmeganato5
and for part a)
$$-f(t) = -(4t^2 - t + 2)$$
that doesn't then equal $-4t^2+t+2$ \
which isn't $f(t)$ either
ℝαμOmeganato5
can't you do the work with pen/paper?
I can do it on paper but im tryna save some ink
you can look at the question / copy it down
and do the calculations on paper
how much do they actually give you? no separate writing booklet?
It depends on the question, I think they can give writing booklet if we ask
I never asked
And also I finished Q5
Just want to confirm, there is only one stationary point on the curve correct?
Lmao
If 4t² - t + 2, you can write it as 2t (t - 1) + 2
No way, did I still make a mistake
Which q are you talking about
OK sorry
to qb
I believe Qb is separate from Q5
It’s part of it
^
looks ok now
Closed by @timber plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uhhh im not sure which topic specific channel is the most approriate for this q so imma jus ask it here- if we have a number h->0 then can we consider there are numbers between h and 0
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
theres no specific problem question to show- it jus kinda entered my mind while i was studying limits
alright but why cuz if its ->0 then isnt like elemental enough to be next to 0
"elemental"?
small enough
???
i meant small enough
i do not know what "small enough" is supposed to mean
isnt it a yes? consider h/2
okay so if we have h->0 so then does tht mean h is really small or is it right next to 0
There is no "right next" to zero
There can always be other numbers inserted between h and 0
No matter how small h gets
That's how real numbers work
You might say 0.0000000001 is right next to 0
But then 0.00000000001 is even closer
So you can never be right next to 0
a subset E is dense in T iff for all a<b in T there exists x in E such that a<x<b of smth
thats what google says
if h keeps getting closer and closer to 0 it means the number of numbers between h and 0 keeps reducing so then
okay no wait
ur right
thanks
what does dense mean 😭
the second part of ny aentence after iff (atleast if i read it correctly)
OHHH Okyayay got it
thankssss
.close
Closed by @lofty canyon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given the stereographic projection is a homeomorphism from R^n to the punctured ball in the higher dimension and the ith coordinate of the projection of (x1,...,xn+1) is x1/(1-xn+1), prove the ball is homeomorphic to the one-point compactification of the lower dimension space
Time to throw the punctured ball into the 7th dimension
all my homies love the 178635289th dimension
anyways
i can send a screenshot of the answer and explain what parts i dont understand, but i will appreciate it very much if u could explain from the ground up
parts i dont understand:
in lines4 and 5, since S^n is a subset of E^n+1 ... implies 1-epsilon>xn+1
oh i only dont understand that part. neat
@errant basin Has your question been resolved?
@errant basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @errant basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i was solving this and i got c is less than or equal to (-infinite,0] U [1,infinite)
is it possible to draw any conclusion from this??
what do you mean by
less than or equal to (-∞,0)?
less than or equal to should be used with a number
like <= 4
did you mean that the expression is always real for c in (-∞, 0] U [1, ∞)?
well i got an equation with, c is less than or equal to (quadratic)/(quadtratic)
and the (-infinite,0] thing was its range
oh
@fringe sigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
parts i dont understand:
in lines4 and 5, since S^n is a subset of E^n+1 ... implies 1-epsilon>xn+1
<@&286206848099549185>
@errant basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @errant basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is the question I have to do and here is my force diagram, what exactly am I doing wrong? And is there an easier way to do it?
Bruh! Th C thing is not defined!
torque? i dunno if thats what youre already doing
@rancid depot Has your question been resolved?
yeah exactly
and if the length of the string and radius are the same, it would make a very very wierd diagram i think
Isn’t it still solvable?
@rancid depot Has your question been resolved?
Radius of sphere = a
Length of string = a
Tension in the string = 2W/sqroot 3
equate anticlockwise torque to clockwise torque
you can take about what ever point u want but i suggest take about C
okay ill try that thank you
no wait sorry
take about A not C
cause u cant write torque for tension
Closed by @rancid depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(243)^1/5
,calc (243)^1/5
Result:
48.6
no
ok
3^5 = 243
,calc (243)^(1/5)
Result:
3
Hi
hello, if you have a question check out #❓how-to-get-help . if you want to chat then look at #360643390594875392 or the discussion category in general. this channel is currently occupied by another user.
oh sry
np, welcome to the mathcord! 
@cosmic sleet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey is there any geometrical meaning of an integral over a curve of a 2 input function ?
like there is with reimann integral where we can interpret it as sum of rectangles with very small side dx
that would be surface integral
where you have dx dy
this you got ds on a curve
Just show an example
is this what we refer to as contour integral?
Well in the context of complex analysis you would call it that, but this a real valued function so you'd just say line integral usually.
whats the difference
The contour lies in the complex plane
What canbe 3D?
not 3d uhm i mean
if we use z for the imaginary axis
and x for real
can there also be a y axis
i mean like is there a case where curve is not on 1 plane but on a xyz coordinate system
There is this thing I know of
Like you can have real valued function, and add a third dimension to visualize the complex roots of it for instance of a quadratic, what is above only shows the relation between exp function and trigonometric functions.
@exotic shale Has your question been resolved?
ok
yea alr thanks
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Aye, how to find cosec 300000 degrees?
@round harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @round harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks bro 😁
Yw
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I’m not sure why I’m getting this wrong
What rule did you use?
I use the power rule
But it seems you power ruled the wrong thing.
ik the power rule is fast but try using the definition yall
You would take down the 3/2 and subtract 1 from that power.
unless stated otherwise, it is always more convenient to use the rules we proved using the definition
ig so but math is about showing
So I used it at the wrong time
like use the definiton for 3tan(sinx)
You dont sit and prove the power rule in every differentiation 
I don't know, what time is it for you?
sometimes i do
weird
u gotta do wat u gotta do

why am i keep forgetting simple algebra
uu, what were you trying to do here?
see thats why u use the def to upgrade ur algebra
cuz if u differentiate x its 1
Broski, you said power rule, not product.
okay so if you have f(x)g(x) and you want to differentiate it, this is not equal to f'(x)g'(x)
i wish it was
if u havent learnt the product rule, use the method of universe
but no u use gf'+fg'
which is the power rule
is that chain rule?
chain rule has to do with compositions of functions
makes sense
f(g(x)) is a rule that says we take g(x) then plug it into f(x)
we sometimes want to differentiate that
g(x) = x 
that is when we invoke the chain rule
thats the indentity function pretty sure
yes that is the id map
Prove it 🫵🏻
wdym prove it, its already like that
im confused what do u mean
for all x in D, if g(x) = x then thats the definition of identity
Why would you differentiate x seperately?
why cant i differentiate x
number 1, u would be able to do it if it was a constant multiple
Because you did consider them as one thing x^3/2 not as a product
Closed by @timber plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
yes bot, slayyy
what were you saying @tranquil pine
real
💅
I only saw the original qn 😂 so i wrote the exact same thing someone else said
f’(x) = fg’x + gf’x
Closed by @timber plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I approach with this without simplifying into sin and cos
Did you try u=sqrt(tan(x))
he did
Did I try it?
Can you show what he did
||you need sec^2 to cancel out tho?||
No. Try u=log(x) too
@arctic mica Has your question been resolved?
Im imagining a u=theta-pi/4 sub
oo ur right
I was thinking of converting it into π/4 + θ by cancelling the minuses in num and denom but that didn't work
Lemme try that
That leaves a sec and tan in the numerator and a √tan in the denominator
Would it be wise to write the denominator as a form of sec and substitute that?
They're still different though
I don't see how a sub would work around it
Combine that into the denom
Then you get something like $\sqrt{\sin 2\theta}$
Element118
Would it be possible to solve this integral without ever simplifying into sin or cos
cuz I wanted to solve this without simplifying into sin and cos terms
eh why do you want to restrict yourself
Just looking for other methods
Already got the answer by deepseek in sin and cos terms but it seems to have trouble finding the correct answer without simplifying into sin and cos
weierstrass sub?
Yeah if you dont want to touch sin and cos you can always just tan theta/2 those expressions
Alright I'll try that approach
vibe mathematician
uses AI to do math
what
Vibe coding is an approach to producing software by using artificial intelligence (AI), where a person describes a problem in a few natural language sentences as a prompt to a large language model (LLM) tuned for coding. The LLM generates software based on the description, shifting the programmer's role from manual coding to guiding, testing, an...
uh okay
@arctic mica Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @arctic mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
careful: 1 - x^2 is not equal to -(1 + x^2) = -1 - x^2
so x is equal to1
you missed a solution
1 - x^2 = 0 has two solutions
yep! that's correct
product rule in derivatives
write out the product rule form where you leave the d/dx (...) for now
then d/dx (x^2) should be no problem
for d/dx (2x - 1)^3, you need the chain rule, which tells you to multiply the thing you get after the power rule by what?
or have you already found f'(x) but you haven't factored it yet
@timber plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please explain this? why can we surely find such p, q and r?
consider the span of {1, sin(x), cos(x)} in the space of all functions from R to R
errrr wait hold on.
are we sure thats what we want the linear independence of
i think the linear independence of {d cos(x) + e sin(x) + f, -d sin(x) + e cos(x), 1} is rather more important
for which we need like... d and e both nonzero i think
which means they span the same space as {1, sin(x), cos(x)}
what is meant by 'span in the space' ?
do you know what span means in linear algebra
no
If you dont know much linalg, just skip it for now and jump to equating the coefficients. It will give you a linear system of equations and if you at least have some intuition about linear systems, you'll see that the system has a solution
If i say to you that R² = span((1,0), (0,1)) does that remind you something ?
if you do insist on knowing why we require linear independence, just know it forces unique solutions onto the coefficients
The coefficients being the coordinates in the basis of the span, so thats why its unique
(Two distincts vectors having same coordinates is not a thing)
What class is this?
no it doesnt
yeah i was thinking why cant it have more than one solutions
Span(.) is the space created by the linear combinations of what is in ()
So all the functions of the form acosx + bsinx + c for the span(1,cosx,sinx) and a,b,c being reals
oh
Its like when you say that (5,3) in the canonical basis of R² is 5*(1,0) + 3(0,1) and so the coordinates are (5,3)
Same here but with functions instead of R² vectors
and that function can never be equal to zero? so they are linearly independent?
for all values of x
Linearly independant means that you can't express one of the function with a linear combination of the others
And yeah for all values of x
More like that the function = 0 implies coefficient being all 0
For all x again
yeah i had studied a bit of linear independence in vectors
Same concepts with functions then
how can we prove it for sinx cosx and 1 ? it just feels like they are linearly independent but i dont exactly know why
Set it equal to 0
And choose wisely the value of x to get that all coefficients must be 0 if its equal to 0
You can look at limits, derivative also but here it doesn't brings much since sin and cos do not have limits and the derivatives are cycle
the derivatives actually can help here i think
but there is like a thousand ways to prove it
i can make a degree 2 equation in sin x and if both roots of the quadratic are either less than -1 or more than 1 then maybe all the coefficients will have to be equal to zero
"Maybe" no, be sure
Can take the derivative and see what happen in x = pi/2 for example or x = 0
-asinx +bcosx = 0
tanx=b/a
we found a solution other than a,b,c = 0 so its linearly independent?
No
Linearly independant means acosx + bsinx + c = 0 ==> a,b,c = 0
For all x in R
tanx not being defined on all x in R this do not work
So -asinx + bcosx = 0, if we take x = 0 we have :
-asin(0) + bcos(0) = 0
bcos(0) = 0
b = 0
Ok
So now we can fast deduce that -asin(x) = 0 and so a = 0 by going back to the derivative
yeah
So now the initial equation is acos(x) + bsin(x) + c = 0 but we have seen that a = b = 0 with the derivative
so c = 0
so because s,c,1 are linearly independent
we get
a = pd + qe
b = pe -qd
c = pf + r
from the first eqn we get one value of p,q
and from the third one value of r
so theres only 1 solution?
independant but yeah
If its dependant there is infinitely many sol
And you can't make the equations you wrote
typo
wdym?
Yw
also, i had once learned how to find if a system of three equation has no solutions/1 solutions/inf solutions using determinants
i know the method but not the proof/ logic of why it works
do you know where can i learn it properly
online
i think its related to this
@iron panther Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the correct answer is the black bit my answer is the green bit why would my answer be wrong and for the black ink working out why is it correct why do we just multiply?
you completely misunderstood the problem
70% OF the 80% wanted big screen
draw a diagram
venn diagram maybe
venn
helps visualize for begginers no?
yh so wouldnt it be 0.7/0.8
okay so
since is OF
yh
You okay with this?
okay
so 80% OF the people who said yes
which is 80% * 0.7
Want a big screen
oh yh
and can you calculate that
so 0.8 x 0.7

