#help-36
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
ohh
then input it into the formula
i did 8 * 31.72
ohh
mb
so its 5170 right
yes perfect
its a bit of a pain
since only given apothem
but for questions like that use the apothem to work out the side length
then apply ap/2
okay thank you so much for your help 🙂
@wind bough Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There's no way to add to 6 and multiply to -5
I'm trying to get my x intercepts
This is for graphing parabolas
note the -x^2
note that the coefficient of -x^2 is -1 rather than 1
also this equation should be 0 = -x^2 + 6x - 5
Yea I see that, do I just factor out the negative for the x intercepts?
sure, or you can directly divide the equation by -1
0 = -x^2 + 6x - 5
this equation
And this doesn't effect the vertex part or y intercept?
This is only for the x intercepts?
I feel like that'd be too far fetched
it would make the y coordinate of vertex different
but for x intercepts, you are just solving equation 0 = -x^2 + 6x - 5
and you can multiply both sides of the equation by constant -1
doing that, you get -1 * 0 = x^2 - 6x + 5
but -1 * 0 is just 0
so it becomes simply 0 = x^2 - 6x + 5
Oh I see
How would it effect them? Like I already have the vertex as (3, -4)
But that was before I was solving for the x intercepts
yes, thats correct
it would only affect it if you did the multiplication by -1 during the process of finding vertex
but since you're only using the modified equation to find x intercepts, its fine
So would this be the correct way to find the x intercepts?
And then does y intercept remain -5? Or change to 5 after the thing to find the x intercepts
Oh yea
Also it should add to -6 and multiply to 5
So that'd be -5, -1 then
And the x intercepts would be (5, 1)
Sorry this is taking so long to get 😞I have a test on this in a few hours
But would this be the correct final result?
@sacred coral Has your question been resolved?
there u go
Closed by @sacred coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just making sure am correct
yes
Closed by @fiery prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u do part a
@ancient monolith Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ancient monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this not the same as -sqrt2 - 4 , sqrt 2 -4 ??
You forgot the plus sign
where?
-4+sqrt2
thers no -4 + sqrt2
That’s the same
√2 is the same as +√2
if it was
-4 - sqrt 2, -4sqrt2 its the same right?
oh okay
i get it
yeah okay
how about this one
i did 4x^2 +10x = -15 so far is that right
You should start by dividing by 4 both sides
No 😭
You want to complete the square so, unless you do this everyday u better let the coefficient of x^2 as 1
Easier to let it be 4 imo but u do u
0/4 = 0
Correct
u saying divide just the x^2 by 4?
And the other side?
You let as a fraction
okay
What did u do?
10x/4 x 2/1
You have to do like this. (x+10/8)^2 - 100/64 = 15/4
Try your way and show how do u complete the square
Bru
You can’t multiply things unless you do the same thing to both sides
You’ll be changing the equation
Correct
Whatever you do in one side of the equation you have to do in the other
I recommend you do my way, it is very easy once you know how to do it
okay wait
Do it because the way u explain is incorrect
But maybe u mean the correct
So do it and i see
25/16
Write the whole thing
Lol just do the quadratic eq ur not gonna be able to complete the square most of the time if ur doing anything except curated problems
I mean u will do it anytime
But its slower than the quadratic eq
?
If you cant read dont talk here please
i need to learn comp the square because theres some problems like graphing rational equations
that need comp the square
Check this
Look at this for a second
Forget about your equation
x^2 +ax = (x+a/2)^2-(a/2)^2
a can be any number
Now use in your left side
x+(5/2)x
a=5/2
I am not sure i cannot read that
x^2 + 5/2 = (x + 5/2 )^2 - (5/2)^2
i dont get this
Yes
okay from how i understand it lets say i have this x2 + 8x + 14 = 0
i have to move 14 to right side right
then after that
i divide 8 by 2 to get 4
then square the thing to get 16
i wanna do this but
for this one
ur doing it differently from what im doing
Doesnt matter, the important thing is u understand why u add these numbers
x^2 + 8x + 16
u said expand (x+4)^2
Yes
so i expandded
I want u to answer my question
In the original equation
We dont have that +16
Right?
U add it
but i will eventually
To make it true
becomes 5/2 x 2/1 right
dont u have to take reciprocal of 2
10
Now divide 10/2
5
yes
Which is 20/4
5
So when u have 5/2 divided by 2
U have 5/4
5/2 divided by 2/1
You can see like this
isnt it supposed to be
5x / 2 times 2/ 1
Why, u have to divide by 2 not multiply by 2
dividing fractions is just multiplying it by the reciprocal
no
i did it wrong
the reciprocal of 2 is 1/2
Yes
i was doing 2/1 instead of 1/2
ok now i get why i got 25/16
Nice
yes?
Yes
i know the right side is 85/16
can u go over how to get the
right side in the form (x+ __) ^2
(x+5/4)^2
Yeah
so the half of the b?
Thats why u do half
This is correct
Unless im missing something it looks correct to me
okay
You have this
i dont understand the way u do it but i want to understand
x^2+bx+c=0
(x+b/2)^2 - (b/2)^2 + c =0
This way u complete the square in one step
And u dont have to calculate anything before completing it
Now yoi just rearrange the terms
Yea like that
so u dont move c to other side>
They are numbers, u do now
You can even do the math of c and -(b/2)^2
And affer that put in the right side
Because u already completed the square
In the first step
I will show u with an example
(x+4)^2 -16 + 14 = 0
(x+4)^2 -2=0
Perfect
so i just move 2 then sqrt?
Correct
to get the x 's
Isnt this faster?
No
b is already 5/2
You have to do b/2
It should be (x+5/4)^2-(5/4)^2-15/4=0
Remember one thing
What i showed u was for x^2+bx+c
In that exercise u have 4x^2 in the beginning
Yes
Yes
the half of it
And we want b/2
yeahhhhhhh
okay thank you
Practice with this method and u will solve quadratics in 10 seconds
Closed by @wise light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I need to find the antiderivative to f(x)=ln(x^2+8x+25)
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2 I have tried using 1*ln(x^2+8x+25) and doing partial integration from that but I can't seem to get it to work
Show your work
How? With a picture?
Yeah, or at least just type the new thing that you need to integrate
So i integrated 1ln(x^2+8x+25) and got xln(x^2+8x+25) - int(x/(x^2+8x+25)) but I kind of got into a loop
I don't see any loops, you now only need to integrate a rational function; Also, are you sure the new integrand shouldn't be (2x^2 + 8x)/(x^2 + 8x + 25)?
I don't see how the 1 would become (2x^2 + 8x)
Tell me the derivative of ln(x^2 + 8x + 25)
Ah alright i see now
Anyway, start by performing the polynomial division
@faint rock Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @faint rock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the x-intercept is where the graph intersects the x-axis, this is where y = z = 0. if you set y = z = 0, you get what they say
similarly for y and z intercepts
@rugged fiber Has your question been resolved?
Aaaaah
Thankyou so much
Closed by @rugged fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does it mean for the right figure to be according to left cosets of K in relation to the left figure?
Like, I don't get where the inside structure went
K is like ±1
so it's just included in the "nodes" themselves?
yea you just absorb them together
I see
i think they are saying the right diagram is the cayley diagram for the group Q_8 / K, with generators {i,j,-1}
so for D3 mod <s> where s is the reflections it would just be like this?
the arrows are multiplication by r ofc
actually, they should be one directional, since rrH is Hr not H
so pretend I drew it like H to rH to Hr to H
yea directed
you could also write them all as left cosets, since usually the quotient group is the collection of left cosets. but it doesn't really change anything i guess. looks good 
but the problem states that this diagram cannot be the diagram for a group
how come?
to me this looks like D3 mod s would be isomorphic to the group of just rotations of a triangle
isn't this the cayley graph of the cyclic group of order 3, where the generating set is the generator? 
that's what I believe
but I guess there is an issue in here somewhere?
but I can't seem to find it
I'll post what it states in it's entirety, perhaps I'm misunderstanding
The stuff below the problem seems to be an explanation of the issue yet I can't seem to find out why that's the case
well, now D_3 / <s> isn't going to be a group, its just a set of left cosets
well according to the diagram, it looks like a group
it's associative, has an "identity" H, and is closed
inverses would be r^2 and r
well okay, you can define a group operation on {H, rH, r^2H} that makes it into a group. but the one induced by the quotients doesn't work out: its supposed to be defined by aH * bH = (ab)H whenever a,b in D_3.
so, you want rH * r^2H = r^3H = H, for example.
but
rH = {r, rs} = rsH = {rs, rs^2}
and
r^2H = {r^2, r^2s} = srH = {sr, r^2}.
and you would want (rs)H * (srH) = (rssr)H = r^2H. but r^2H is not r^3H = H
so you get weird things like rH times srH goes to r^2H, but rH times r^2H goes to H, even thought srH and r^2H are equal
and i think this is going to give you a weird cayley graph, since its supposed to be with respect to the generators r and s, not just r
(sorry for calling them cayley graphs, that's just the terminology i'm familiar with)
I saw Cayley graph and Cayley diagram, that part is fine, idc either way
yay
but hmm
I'm gonna think about what you wrote a bit more
I also fcked it up since r^2s is not sr
sr^2 is rs
wait
i think r^2s is sr

I wrote something else weird
oh I had..
well wait, nvm, I think It is fine rn
ohh I had sr^2 is rs
UGH WAIT
FUCK
let me share my diagram
I think I'm tripping
i don't even know how i'd try to draw the cayley graph. you could write H, rH and r^2H, but now multiplying by srH and r^2H does different things to rH depending on if you write it as rH or rsH. lol
I guess that's the point of the problem then
so maybe they want you to write tons of cosets like rH, rsH, srH, r^2H, H, r^2sH, etc
i don't know 
I see
I only did the cosets Hr and rH
but also I didn't verify that r^2H is Hr
idk why I did that part
yea, D_3 / <s> in this case is supposed to mean the set {H, rH, r^2H}, i think. its just that the cosets don't form a group (under the group law induced from D_3)
and rH has multiple representatives, like sr^2H or rsH
oh i excluded multiplication by s
bc if it was just r, it'd be fine
well
wait..
omg
fuck this triangle bullshit, I wish the problem was with D4 instead
sigh
lol but then it would work because {1,s} would be normal
yeah

Closed by @bold badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is this 2/3
I do F(b) - F(a)
So you get 2/3 - 0 = 2/3
But then there's a 2 outside
so 4/3?
2$\int u^2 = \frac{2}{3}u^3$ not $\frac{4}{3}u^3$
chebyshev's infinite pee norm
Yes thats what it says in the picture?
It is bounded
that is why I am confused
0 - 1
I did F(b) - F(a) and I get 2/3
But then theres a 2 outside the integral that would make it 4/3
But the professor says its just 2/3 not 4/3
u^3/3
Then where is your confusion
I mean
@glad basalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glad basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
AB and CD lines are parallel CD=5AB need to find BC if OB=3
Do you understand the parity between the angles of the two triangles?
Because the lines are vertical and you have two vertically opposed angles (shitty translation)?
So if CD = 5AB implies that you can downsize the bigger triangle into the smaller one diving the sides by 5
Or if you want to amplify, just multiply by 5
Thus BC = OB x 5 = 15
@sacred lynx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sacred lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to get started on this one?
$f_x \cdot (x - x_1) + f_y \cdot (y - y_1) + f_z \cdot (z - z_1) = 0$
Kookiemon
ah same equation as always then. one moment
so dh/dy would be f_x and dh/dz would be f_y ?
You have the general equation x = h(y,z). If you put that into standard form, you would get h(y,z) - x = 0.
From there, you would evaluate the partial derivatives, of which you are given two by the problem.
Looks good.
Closed by @jagged stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is just a system of linear equations
use matrices to solve the system of linear equations
.close
Closed by @gentle trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
.close(cool)
Closed by @gentle trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no
do not use linear system
do not use polynomial interpolation
use method of finite differences
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
k
notice ur given x-values -2, 0, 2, 4, 6 satisfy an arithmetic progression
then, u may apply method of finite differences
so, set up figure that looks like this:
(each successive row is determined by finding the "difference" between the two terms above)
x-values -2 0 2 4 6
y-values ? 1 15 133 427
? 14 118 294
? 104 176
? 72
then, this method tells us that the bottom question mark is a 72. by finite differences, this is because the 4th row from the y-values must be a constant as we are dealing with a cubic
then, complete the figure as follows:
x-values -2 0 2 4 6
y-values 19 1 15 133 427
-18 14 118 294
32 104 176
72 72
hence, p(-2) = 19
.close
Closed by @vital surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(if this explanation does not not make perfect sense internet will help you probably)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
all the answers are true so we need an image of those postulates
also I need the skullcry emoji
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
@zenith pollen how genius
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
4.8/2.5=9.7/MN MNx4.8=24.25 MN=5.05
are my ans
corect
guys pls i need help fast
@plucky obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with (b). Thanks in advance
@tidal idol Has your question been resolved?
@tidal idol Has your question been resolved?
ok what have u tried?
you should first use partial fractions to expand out f(z)
Yes, I did the partial fraction for (a). After that should I assign u = z-2 and u+1 = z-1?
oh wait i misread
i think so yes
So it becomes 1/(u+1) + 2/u, and for the first term can be expanded into (1 - u + u^2 - u^3...) I think. And that's the final result?
hmm what is ur final result in terms of z?
2(z-2)^-1 + (1 - (z-2)^-1 + (z-2)^-2) + ...)
that doesnt feel like it would make sense
How so?
one sec ill try writing it out
yeah sorry i am not so sure. Although u might be better off asking in #real-complex-analysis
as the help channels are usually meant for highschool level content
@tidal idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tidal idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Using the double angle formula find the exact values of cos 15
cos 30 = 2 cos ^2 15 - 1
root3/2 = 2 cos^2 15-1
cos 15 = root(root3 - 1 / 4)
where'd I go wrong? or is it the wrong formula
i know we can use compound angle identities, cos (45-30) = sin45sin30+cos45cos30
how did you get root(root3 - 1/4)
but is compound angle identities the same as double angle formula?
i bet i did something stupid okay so
cos 30 = root 3/2
solve stepwise
yop continue
root3/2 +1 = 2 cos^2 15
(root3/2 +1) / 2 = cos^2 15
root ((root3/2 +1) / 2) = cos 15
yop
no
what can I write root ((root3/2 +1) / 2) as?
do you need to rewrite it?
cant I do root ((root3 +1) / 2 * 2)
well not really i just supposed i had to simplify it
is it root(3)/2 or root(3/2)
former
k well then the +1 becomes +2
since you exclude /2 from the brackets
root(3)/2 + 1 = 1/2 * (root(3) + 2)
HUH
what's confusing you :D
so you get root((root(3)+2)/4)
i had to write it down on paper
but in essence the root(3)+2 term will hinder you from further simplifying I think
prob nothing
sweet
also, this is called the double angle formula right?
and compound identities is (A+-B)?
Ys, since you used cos(2A) = 2cos²(A) - 1
sweet, but then how do we do tan 15?
note tan = sin/cos
yop
i feel like im gonna go horribly wrong
In case the fraction isn't easy to simplify you can also try tan(15) = tan(45-30)
but thats compound identities right?
im trying to solve it through double angle
k then the before method
sin 30 = 2 sin 15 cos 15
1/2 = 2 sin 15 cos 15
1/4 = sin 15 cos 15
1/ 4 cos 15 = sin 15
is that right?
cos 15 = root ((root3/2 +1) / 2)
neat
okay so, do I replace cos 15 into sin 15?
1/4 ( root ((root3/2 +1) / 2)) ?
(1/4 ( root ((root3/2 +1) / 2))) / root ((root3/2 +1) / 2) = tan 15
this looks disgusting omdifnm
and therefore sin15 / cos15 = 1/(2*(root(3)/2+1) after you insert
don't worry since you multiply roots
You can combine them
rootX * rootX = X
sweet okay wait ill write it on paper
This can be further simplified, but it's a little tricky
I'll hint that you can get rid of the fraction entirely
THIS IS so ew
:]
WAOAH WHAT
THANK YOUUU
@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find tan 15 using double angle
@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?
GOT THE answer for this one
another question
Given that cos A = 1/2 and A lies in 4th quadrant, find value of cos of A/2, sin of A/2 and determine in which quadrant the < A/2 lies.
Cos A/2
cos A = 2cos^2 (A/2) -1
1 + 1/2 = 2 cos^2 (A/2)
3/4 = cos^2 (A/2)
+- root3/4 = cos (A/2)
Sin A/2
Cos A = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = root 3/4 - sin^2 (A/2)
-root1/2 + root 3/4 = sin^2 (A/2)
is this okay? and where do I go after this?
So what IS A here
im not suree
Try
A is the angle in 4th quad?
Yes so what IS the angle A
Not exactly
So with cos A = 1/2 WE have A = pi/3 or A = -pi/3 right ?
ya
Knowing that A is in 4th quadrant what IS A ?
?
2 pi / 3?
Why
IS IT NOT
Do you understand this ?
yeah
So A can't be 2pi/3
okay
So what IS A ?
A IS - pi/3
👍
YAYO MG
What is A/2 ?
-pi/3 / 2?
?
I didnt write that
-pi/6 right ?
-pi/6
WHAT IS THIS METHOD
I WAS TRYING TO USE THE OFRMULA 😭 😭
ive just been blindly following the formula lmao
It's good to use formula sometimes but when you don't know what to do draw a picture Can help sometimes
i got it like conceptually
but i still dont know how to apply the formula
im pretty sure its wrong but idk why
Do exercises and you will know what to use don't worries
OK BUT IN TERMS OF FORMULA
im doing something terribly wrong
and idk what
Given that cos A = 1/2 and A lies in 4th quadrant, find value of cos of A/2, sin of A/2 and determine in which quadrant the < A/2 lies.
Cos A/2
cos A = 2cos^2 (A/2) -1
1 + 1/2 = 2 cos^2 (A/2)
3/4 = cos^2 (A/2)
+- root3/4 = cos (A/2)
Sin A/2
Cos A = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = - root 3/4 ^2 - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = 3/4 - sin^2 (A/2)
sin^2 (A/2) = 3/4 - 1/2
@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
is A in 0 to 2pi
ya?
i mean i understood A = 60/-60
but idk how to do through formula, where am i fucking up
why not 300
OKAY ya could be that too
BUT LIKE LOOK AT THE FORMULA
why cant i solve through formula
actually no, it is 300 cus its 4th quadrant
which is -60
what about 660
i dont have the answer lmao, im more conufused than you B)
😭 😭 😭
Given that cos A = 1/2 and A lies in 4th quadrant, find value of cos of A/2, sin of A/2 and determine in which quadrant the < A/2 lies.
Cos A/2
cos A = 2cos^2 (A/2) -1
1 + 1/2 = 2 cos^2 (A/2)
3/4 = cos^2 (A/2)
+- root3/4 = cos (A/2)
Sin A/2
Cos A = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = - root 3/4 ^2 - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = 3/4 - sin^2 (A/2)
sin^2 (A/2) = 3/4 - 1/2
<@&286206848099549185>
What's the problem WE already solve that
K first Can you decide whereas it's plus or minus Root 3/4 for cos A/2
No
Remember A lies in 4th quadrant
WE talk earlier of what IS A but he don't remember
I can't help if you make no efforts
yea
why does it matter tho
it can be negative
A/2
A isnt a single value
Yeah sure but it can't be 20 for example
its infinite
A = x |2pi| ?
Maybe you don't know this notation
Hum just Say 1 value of A so
You are in high school ?
..
why 1 value
what value are you taking of A?
What is A pls 😂
Yes finally 😂
Cause when WE divide this angle WE got also in the 4 th quadrant so -root 3/4
Hum plus sry
Calculation seems ok I think
Ye all good
what..
@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?
dont close due to timeout 
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$ln(p^2+1)=2y$
rainy
How do I solve for p here?
i can do:
$p^2+1 = e^{2y}$
but that doesnt help me i think
rainy
yeah i mean ^ is my starting point
from there i can solve
just needed to get that ln out
yea thats correct
Closed by @hard mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont know how to continue with this
usually what i do is substitute p' for dy/dx
but idk if its dy/dx, dx/dy, ...
ah, apperantly i have to replace it by dp/dy
.close
Closed by @hard mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! How can I prove/disprove that an integer n is a sum of 8 integer cubes? So far all I have tried is trying out different values and since 1 and 0 are part of the cubes list, it seems like almost any integer can be represented as a sum of 8 integer cubes.
I’m not sure but perhaps something about base 3?
Well 2^3 is 8
or base 2
And you can represent any number k between 0 and 7 with k * 1^3
I see yes
I am sorry I am a little dense . Then how would I go on with the problem?
no no
er
I see I confused my idea because I was thinking in base 8 after you guys said base 2 lmao
I was more so thinking to partition the base 3 number into 8 parts that all have 2’s in every digit
No that’s not quite right
2 in one particular digit?
I’m not too sure where I was going, it just sounded like a good idea
you can't do 23 unless it's 27 − 1 − 1 − 1 −1
I guess the other 3 are 0’s?
So it's known that you can express n as the sum of 5 cubes, but I'm trying to think of there's a nice way to express it as 8 without just using the decomposition for 5 cubes
No that’s a 4th power
1000 you mean
er 10 cubed not 1000 cubed
,calc cbrt(1331)
Result:
11
Ok well my idea was between consecutive cubes, n^3 and (n+1)^3, there are 3n^2 + 3n = 3n(n+1) terms which is divisible by 6
so find an expression for each 6k + r
And induct
@shut helm Has your question been resolved?
Interesting! Will try. Thank you for the idea
.close
Closed by @shut helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why can you always do multiplication in any order?
because multiplication is commutative on the set of real numbers
its also associative
But why? What is the proof
there's a number of ways to get there
at the root, you want to look at what a Peano System is
and you'll need to know proof by induction
ultimately though, everything is based on a set of axioms
.close
Closed by @cloud portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I have the following linear algebra exercise to solve:
$A = \begin{pmatrix}
1 & a & b\
0 & 1 & c\
0 & 0 & 2
\end{pmatrix}$. Show A is diagonisable if and only if the polynomial $x^2 -3x + 2$ annuls A.\
I immediately thought about using the characteristic polynomial which should always be annuled by A so I calculated
$\chi (x) = (x-1) \cdot (x-1)(x-2) = (x-1)(x^2 -3x + 2)$ and this got me thinking. Normally we'd only care about the unique roots when looking for roots i.e. since $ (x^2 -3x +2) $ is equal to 0 exactly whenever $\chi (x)$ is equal to 0 we don't care about the extra factor of $(x-1)$. However this only holds for numbers. If you put A into the polynomial, we can still have $\chi (A) = 0$ without necessarily having $(A^2 - 3A + 2I)$ if I am understanding correctly, so how can I prove that $A$ annuls $(x^2 -3x +2)$ if and only if it annuls $\chi (x)$?
mippen
.close
Closed by @unique phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i approach?
the sequence converges
100 seems sufficiently large to just set n to infinite and calculate the limit
idk anything about sequence convergence and divergence
can you speak in layman terms
it means as n gets bigger the sequence gets closer and closer to one value
alternatively you can just calculate the first few terms
and stop when the 1st decimal place is constant
but my original idea was to get a bound in terms of n
there was another idea i had
generating functions! but i have never used gen functions in recursive relations when its in denominators
can yyou walk me through it
i have never calculated limits of recursive relation
1st step is realizing that it converges
okay ! then
that would give 0 = 4
which is false
i found a similar problem on mathstack but i didnt get the cruxx of it
also idk about the converges part
oh
but the sequence sure is increasing
what do i do with it now
💀
how do we do that
In mathematics, the harmonic series is the infinite series formed by summing all positive unit fractions:
The first
n
{\displaystyle n}
terms of the series sum to approximately
ln
n
+
γ
{\displaystyle \ln n+\gamma }
, where
...
happy reading
we need to write the sequence as a sum first
how do you even do that?
the mathstack had diff approach of bounding idk
recursion
a_n = a1 + 4S + 4/(a1 + S)
if my math isn't off
where S is the sum of 1/a_k from 1 to k
ok this is already complicated
okay
that's not helpful either
Ok I got it