#help-36

1 messages · Page 120 of 1

magic rampart
#

so now that u have the side length, solve for the perimeter first

wind bough
#

ohh

magic rampart
#

then input it into the formula

wind bough
#

its 253.76 right

#

the perimeter

magic rampart
#

yes

#

actually

#

i got 261.78

#

u type into calculator wrong maybe?

wind bough
#

i did 8 * 31.72

magic rampart
#

oh sorry

#

32.72

wind bough
#

ohh

magic rampart
#

mb

wind bough
#

so its 5170 right

magic rampart
#

yes perfect

#

its a bit of a pain

#

since only given apothem

#

but for questions like that use the apothem to work out the side length

#

then apply ap/2

wind bough
#

okay thank you so much for your help 🙂

magic rampart
#

all good

#

if you don't have anymore questions .close

final saddleBOT
#

@wind bough Has your question been resolved?

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sacred coral
final saddleBOT
sacred coral
#

There's no way to add to 6 and multiply to -5

#

I'm trying to get my x intercepts

#

This is for graphing parabolas

onyx peak
#

note the -x^2

final tangle
#

note that the coefficient of -x^2 is -1 rather than 1

onyx peak
#

also this equation should be 0 = -x^2 + 6x - 5

sacred coral
#

Yea I see that, do I just factor out the negative for the x intercepts?

onyx peak
#

0 = -x^2 + 6x - 5

#

this equation

sacred coral
#

And this doesn't effect the vertex part or y intercept?

This is only for the x intercepts?

#

I feel like that'd be too far fetched

onyx peak
#

but for x intercepts, you are just solving equation 0 = -x^2 + 6x - 5

#

and you can multiply both sides of the equation by constant -1

#

doing that, you get -1 * 0 = x^2 - 6x + 5

#

but -1 * 0 is just 0

#

so it becomes simply 0 = x^2 - 6x + 5

sacred coral
#

Oh I see

sacred coral
#

But that was before I was solving for the x intercepts

onyx peak
#

it would only affect it if you did the multiplication by -1 during the process of finding vertex

#

but since you're only using the modified equation to find x intercepts, its fine

sacred coral
onyx peak
#

not quite

#

3 + -2 isn't 5

sacred coral
#

Oh yea

onyx peak
#

Also it should add to -6 and multiply to 5

sacred coral
#

Sorry this is taking so long to get 😞I have a test on this in a few hours

But would this be the correct final result?

final saddleBOT
#

@sacred coral Has your question been resolved?

sacred coral
#

@onyx peak bud

#

@helper

#

<@&286206848099549185>

fathom walrus
#

@sacred coral

#

what are u trying to find

#

just intercepts?

#

,w y = -x^2 + 6x - 5

fathom walrus
#

there u go

sacred coral
#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sacred coral

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fiery prism
#

just making sure am correct

final saddleBOT
fiery prism
#

i just need to find the "cable"'s hypotenuse correct?

sleek quartz
#

yes

fiery prism
#

thank you

#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fiery prism

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ancient monolith
#

how do u do part a

final saddleBOT
ancient monolith
final saddleBOT
#

@ancient monolith Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @ancient monolith

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wise light
final saddleBOT
wise light
#

this not the same as -sqrt2 - 4 , sqrt 2 -4 ??

silver roost
#

You forgot the plus sign

wise light
whole pecan
#

-4+sqrt2

wise light
#

thers no -4 + sqrt2

topaz elbow
whole pecan
#

That’s the same

topaz elbow
#

the different answers ^

#

you gave -4√2 as your second root

wise light
topaz elbow
#

√2 is the same as +√2

wise light
#

if it was

-4 - sqrt 2, -4sqrt2 its the same right?

solar glade
#

No

#

Sqrt2 -4 is equal to -4+sqrt2

#

Not -4sqrt2

wise light
#

oh okay

#

i get it

#

yeah okay

#

how about this one

#

i did 4x^2 +10x = -15 so far is that right

solar glade
#

You should start by dividing by 4 both sides

silver roost
#

No 😭

solar glade
#

You want to complete the square so, unless you do this everyday u better let the coefficient of x^2 as 1

silver roost
#

Easier to let it be 4 imo but u do u

wise light
solar glade
#

Correct

wise light
#

u saying divide just the x^2 by 4?

solar glade
#

And the other side?

wise light
#

becuse the 10x and -15 is not /4

#

divisible

solar glade
#

You let as a fraction

wise light
#

okay

wise light
#

x^2 + 5x +25 =

solar glade
#

What did u do?

wise light
#

10x/4 x 2/1

solar glade
#

You have to do like this. (x+10/8)^2 - 100/64 = 15/4

wise light
#

the way u do it is complicated

#

cant we just take out 4x^2

solar glade
#

Try your way and show how do u complete the square

silver roost
silver roost
#

You’ll be changing the equation

solar glade
#

Correct

#

Whatever you do in one side of the equation you have to do in the other

#

I recommend you do my way, it is very easy once you know how to do it

wise light
#

okay

#

x^2 + 5x/2 = 15/4

solar glade
#

Ok

#

Now complete the square in the left side

wise light
#

okay wait

solar glade
#

No wait

#

Wait

#

Ok do it

wise light
#

i want to divide 5x/2 by 2

#

and square it right

solar glade
#

Do it because the way u explain is incorrect

#

But maybe u mean the correct

#

So do it and i see

wise light
#

take half of 5x/2

#

and square

#

?

solar glade
#

I wanna see how u do it

#

Write it

wise light
#

25/16

solar glade
#

Write the whole thing

flint kettle
#

Lol just do the quadratic eq ur not gonna be able to complete the square most of the time if ur doing anything except curated problems

#

I mean u will do it anytime

#

But its slower than the quadratic eq

solar glade
#

If you cant read dont talk here please

wise light
#

that need comp the square

solar glade
#

Keep on this raileu

#

Write the whole thing

#

After completing the square

wise light
#

wait im lost

#

x^2 + 5x/2 + _______ =15/4

#

idk how u get 25/16

solar glade
#

Check this

#

Look at this for a second

#

Forget about your equation

#

x^2 +ax = (x+a/2)^2-(a/2)^2

#

a can be any number

#

Now use in your left side

#

x+(5/2)x

#

a=5/2

wise light
solar glade
#

I am not sure i cannot read that

wise light
#

x^2 + 5/2 = (x + 5/2 )^2 - (5/2)^2

solar glade
#

Not exactly

#

x^2 + (5/2)x

wise light
solar glade
#

U forgot the x multiplying

#

That is how u complete any square

wise light
#

can we agree that this so far is right

solar glade
#

Yes

wise light
# wise light

okay from how i understand it lets say i have this x2 + 8x + 14 = 0

wise light
#

then after that

#

i divide 8 by 2 to get 4

#

then square the thing to get 16

wise light
wise light
solar glade
#

(x+8/2)^2 -16=-14

#

Like this

#

Do you know why?

#

Can you expand this? (x+4)^2

wise light
#

ur doing it differently from what im doing

solar glade
#

Doesnt matter, the important thing is u understand why u add these numbers

wise light
solar glade
#

Ok

#

No

#

8x

#

Ok

#

But u have x^2+8x

#

U dont have the 16

#

Right?

wise light
#

u said expand (x+4)^2

solar glade
#

Yes

wise light
solar glade
#

I want u to answer my question

#

In the original equation

#

We dont have that +16

#

Right?

wise light
#

x^2 + 8x +16 = -14 + 16

#

i dont have the 16

solar glade
#

U add it

wise light
#

but i will eventually

solar glade
#

To make it true

wise light
#

x^2 + 8x +16 = 2

#

(x+4)^2 = 2

#

i get this question

solar glade
#

Ok if you want to do like that

#

U can do it

#

Divide 5/2 by 2

wise light
#

becomes 5/2 x 2/1 right

solar glade
#

No i said divide

#

U divided 8/2

#

Now u do the same here

#

U divide 5/2 by 2

wise light
#

dont u have to take reciprocal of 2

solar glade
#

Imagine this number

#

20/2

#

What is that

wise light
#

10

solar glade
#

Now divide 10/2

wise light
#

5

solar glade
#

Ok now divide 20/2 by 2

#

(20/2)/2

#

Isnt that 5?

wise light
#

yes

solar glade
#

Which is 20/4

wise light
#

5

solar glade
#

So when u have 5/2 divided by 2

#

U have 5/4

#

5/2 divided by 2/1

#

You can see like this

wise light
#

isnt it supposed to be

5x / 2 times 2/ 1

solar glade
#

Why, u have to divide by 2 not multiply by 2

wise light
#

dividing fractions is just multiplying it by the reciprocal

#

no

#

i did it wrong

#

the reciprocal of 2 is 1/2

solar glade
#

Yes

wise light
#

i was doing 2/1 instead of 1/2

solar glade
#

Now u are doing correctly

#

So now u have 5/4 right?

wise light
#

ok now i get why i got 25/16

solar glade
#

Nice

wise light
#

that was so frustrating

#

ok so far

wise light
solar glade
#

Yes

wise light
#

i know the right side is 85/16

#

can u go over how to get the

right side in the form (x+ __) ^2

solar glade
#

U already have it dont

#

Done

wise light
#

(x+5/4)^2

solar glade
#

Yeah

wise light
#

so the half of the b?

solar glade
#

Because when u expand that

#

U will get twice

wise light
#

its just (x+b)^2

#

?

solar glade
#

Thats why u do half

solar glade
wise light
#

x = -5/4 +- sqrt85/4

#

its same as this?

solar glade
#

Unless im missing something it looks correct to me

wise light
#

great

#

thank you

#

completing the square sucks

solar glade
#

I recommend u doing my way

#

It is easier

#

I will write here right quick

wise light
#

okay

solar glade
#

You have this

wise light
#

i dont understand the way u do it but i want to understand

solar glade
#

x^2+bx+c=0

#

(x+b/2)^2 - (b/2)^2 + c =0

#

This way u complete the square in one step

#

And u dont have to calculate anything before completing it

#

Now yoi just rearrange the terms

wise light
#

like this

#

?

solar glade
#

Make the correction

#

I did a typo

#

I corrected it

wise light
solar glade
#

Yea like that

wise light
#

so u dont move c to other side>

solar glade
#

They are numbers, u do now

#

You can even do the math of c and -(b/2)^2

#

And affer that put in the right side

#

Because u already completed the square

#

In the first step

#

I will show u with an example

wise light
#

x^2 +8x +14 = 0

#

(x+16)^2 - 50 = 0

solar glade
#

No no

#

b/2 not 2b

wise light
#

(x+4)^2 -16 + 14 = 0

solar glade
#

Yes

#

Like that

wise light
#

(x+4)^2 -2=0

solar glade
#

Perfect

wise light
#

so i just move 2 then sqrt?

solar glade
#

Correct

wise light
#

to get the x 's

solar glade
#

Isnt this faster?

wise light
#

ok let me try with the oen with fraction

#

(x + 5/2 ) ^2 - (5/2)^2 -15 = 0?

solar glade
#

No

#

b is already 5/2

#

You have to do b/2

#

It should be (x+5/4)^2-(5/4)^2-15/4=0

#

Remember one thing

#

What i showed u was for x^2+bx+c

#

In that exercise u have 4x^2 in the beginning

wise light
#

is this right

solar glade
#

Yes

wise light
#

so now i can do the other way

#

since a is 1

#

yes?

solar glade
#

Yes now just b=5/2 and c =-15/4

#

Do b/2 remmeber

wise light
solar glade
#

Yes

wise light
#

and why is the first one (x+ 5/4)^2 again?

#

and not (x + 5/2)^2

solar glade
#

Because u had 5x/2

#

So b = 5/2

wise light
#

the half of it

solar glade
#

And we want b/2

wise light
#

yeahhhhhhh

solar glade
#

Nice

#

Now i have to leave, i hope u understood the method

wise light
#

okay thank you

solar glade
#

Practice with this method and u will solve quadratics in 10 seconds

wise light
#

.clsoe

#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wise light

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

faint rock
#

Hi! I need to find the antiderivative to f(x)=ln(x^2+8x+25)

final saddleBOT
# faint rock Hi! I need to find the antiderivative to f(x)=ln(x^2+8x+25)
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
faint rock
#

2 I have tried using 1*ln(x^2+8x+25) and doing partial integration from that but I can't seem to get it to work

amber holly
#

Show your work

faint rock
#

How? With a picture?

amber holly
#

Yeah, or at least just type the new thing that you need to integrate

faint rock
#

So i integrated 1ln(x^2+8x+25) and got xln(x^2+8x+25) - int(x/(x^2+8x+25)) but I kind of got into a loop

amber holly
#

I don't see any loops, you now only need to integrate a rational function; Also, are you sure the new integrand shouldn't be (2x^2 + 8x)/(x^2 + 8x + 25)?

faint rock
#

I don't see how the 1 would become (2x^2 + 8x)

amber holly
#

Tell me the derivative of ln(x^2 + 8x + 25)

faint rock
#

Ah alright i see now

amber holly
#

Anyway, start by performing the polynomial division

final saddleBOT
#

@faint rock Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @faint rock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rugged fiber
final saddleBOT
rugged fiber
#

I dont understand how they got the highlighted part

solemn umbra
#

the x-intercept is where the graph intersects the x-axis, this is where y = z = 0. if you set y = z = 0, you get what they say

#

similarly for y and z intercepts

final saddleBOT
#

@rugged fiber Has your question been resolved?

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rugged fiber

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bold badge
#

What does it mean for the right figure to be according to left cosets of K in relation to the left figure?

bold badge
#

Like, I don't get where the inside structure went

zenith pollen
#

K is like ±1

bold badge
#

so it's just included in the "nodes" themselves?

zenith pollen
#

yea you just absorb them together

bold badge
#

I see

solemn umbra
#

i think they are saying the right diagram is the cayley diagram for the group Q_8 / K, with generators {i,j,-1}

bold badge
#

so for D3 mod <s> where s is the reflections it would just be like this?

#

the arrows are multiplication by r ofc

#

actually, they should be one directional, since rrH is Hr not H

#

so pretend I drew it like H to rH to Hr to H

zenith pollen
#

yea directed

bold badge
#

I'll fix that in my drawing rn actually

#

Ah, so it's fine then

solemn umbra
#

you could also write them all as left cosets, since usually the quotient group is the collection of left cosets. but it doesn't really change anything i guess. looks good peepoHappy

bold badge
#

but the problem states that this diagram cannot be the diagram for a group

#

how come?

#

to me this looks like D3 mod s would be isomorphic to the group of just rotations of a triangle

solemn umbra
#

isn't this the cayley graph of the cyclic group of order 3, where the generating set is the generator? PepoThink

bold badge
#

that's what I believe

#

but I guess there is an issue in here somewhere?

#

but I can't seem to find it

solemn umbra
#

the book says this directed graph can't be the cayley graph of any group?

bold badge
#

I'll post what it states in it's entirety, perhaps I'm misunderstanding

#

The stuff below the problem seems to be an explanation of the issue yet I can't seem to find out why that's the case

solemn umbra
#

oh, i forgot {1,s} is not a normal subgroup

#

hmm

bold badge
#

is that important?

#

must we have that the left and right cosets are the same?

solemn umbra
#

well, now D_3 / <s> isn't going to be a group, its just a set of left cosets

bold badge
#

well according to the diagram, it looks like a group

#

it's associative, has an "identity" H, and is closed

#

inverses would be r^2 and r

solemn umbra
#

well okay, you can define a group operation on {H, rH, r^2H} that makes it into a group. but the one induced by the quotients doesn't work out: its supposed to be defined by aH * bH = (ab)H whenever a,b in D_3.

so, you want rH * r^2H = r^3H = H, for example.

but
rH = {r, rs} = rsH = {rs, rs^2}
and
r^2H = {r^2, r^2s} = srH = {sr, r^2}.
and you would want (rs)H * (srH) = (rssr)H = r^2H. but r^2H is not r^3H = H

#

so you get weird things like rH times srH goes to r^2H, but rH times r^2H goes to H, even thought srH and r^2H are equal

#

and i think this is going to give you a weird cayley graph, since its supposed to be with respect to the generators r and s, not just r

#

(sorry for calling them cayley graphs, that's just the terminology i'm familiar with)

bold badge
#

I saw Cayley graph and Cayley diagram, that part is fine, idc either way

solemn umbra
#

yay

bold badge
#

but hmm

#

I'm gonna think about what you wrote a bit more

#

I also fcked it up since r^2s is not sr

#

sr^2 is rs

#

wait

solemn umbra
#

i think r^2s is sr

bold badge
#

r^2s is sr

#

ye

solemn umbra
bold badge
#

I wrote something else weird

#

oh I had..

#

well wait, nvm, I think It is fine rn

#

ohh I had sr^2 is rs

#

UGH WAIT

#

FUCK

#

let me share my diagram

#

I think I'm tripping

solemn umbra
#

i don't even know how i'd try to draw the cayley graph. you could write H, rH and r^2H, but now multiplying by srH and r^2H does different things to rH depending on if you write it as rH or rsH. lol

bold badge
solemn umbra
#

so maybe they want you to write tons of cosets like rH, rsH, srH, r^2H, H, r^2sH, etc

#

i don't know FeelsBadMan

bold badge
#

I see

#

I only did the cosets Hr and rH

#

but also I didn't verify that r^2H is Hr

#

idk why I did that part

solemn umbra
#

yea, D_3 / <s> in this case is supposed to mean the set {H, rH, r^2H}, i think. its just that the cosets don't form a group (under the group law induced from D_3)

#

and rH has multiple representatives, like sr^2H or rsH

bold badge
#

oh i excluded multiplication by s

#

bc if it was just r, it'd be fine

#

well

#

wait..

#

omg

#

fuck this triangle bullshit, I wish the problem was with D4 instead

#

sigh

solemn umbra
#

lol but then it would work because {1,s} would be normal

bold badge
#

yeah

solemn umbra
bold badge
#

😭

#

I'm gonna try this again later tbh

#

thanks for the help though

#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bold badge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

glad basalt
final saddleBOT
glad basalt
#

Why is this 2/3

#

I do F(b) - F(a)

#

So you get 2/3 - 0 = 2/3

#

But then there's a 2 outside

#

so 4/3?

mellow axle
#

2$\int u^2 = \frac{2}{3}u^3$ not $\frac{4}{3}u^3$

soft zealotBOT
#

chebyshev's infinite pee norm

glad basalt
#

It is bounded

#

that is why I am confused

#

0 - 1

#

I did F(b) - F(a) and I get 2/3

#

But then theres a 2 outside the integral that would make it 4/3

#

But the professor says its just 2/3 not 4/3

solar glade
#

What is the integral of u^2

#

@glad basalt

glad basalt
#

u^3/3

solar glade
#

Then where is your confusion

glad basalt
solar glade
#

I mean

glad basalt
#

This is the antiderivative

#

2/3 * u^3

#

to solve we do F(b) - F(a)

#

F(1) - F(0)

solar glade
#

That is 2 int u^2

#

Why do u want to multiply by 2 twice

glad basalt
#

Oh

#

So they just brought the 2 in

#

I gotch you

solar glade
#

U do this

#

2(F(b)-F(a))

#

2(1/3-0)

#

2/3-0

#

2/3

glad basalt
#

Ok

#

I thought 2/3 u^3 was the integral and the 2 was outside

#

thanks

final saddleBOT
#

@glad basalt Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @glad basalt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sacred lynx
#

AB and CD lines are parallel CD=5AB need to find BC if OB=3

tranquil pine
#

Because the lines are vertical and you have two vertically opposed angles (shitty translation)?

#

So if CD = 5AB implies that you can downsize the bigger triangle into the smaller one diving the sides by 5

#

Or if you want to amplify, just multiply by 5

#

Thus BC = OB x 5 = 15

final saddleBOT
#

@sacred lynx Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @sacred lynx

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jagged stump
#

how to get started on this one?

final saddleBOT
celest crane
#

$f_x \cdot (x - x_1) + f_y \cdot (y - y_1) + f_z \cdot (z - z_1) = 0$

soft zealotBOT
#

Kookiemon

jagged stump
#

ah same equation as always then. one moment

#

so dh/dy would be f_x and dh/dz would be f_y ?

celest crane
#

You have the general equation x = h(y,z). If you put that into standard form, you would get h(y,z) - x = 0.

#

From there, you would evaluate the partial derivatives, of which you are given two by the problem.

jagged stump
#

ohoh ok

celest crane
jagged stump
#

yippeee ill try it

#

it worked ! thank you

#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jagged stump

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gentle trout
final saddleBOT
gentle trout
#

no clue

#

any theorem i can use that i can just research

hybrid heath
#

this is just a system of linear equations

warm python
gentle trout
#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @gentle trout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

fathom walrus
#

dang bruh

#

i was just about to share a nice explanation

#

oh well

gentle trout
#

my fault

#

.reopen

final saddleBOT
#

gentle trout
#

always nic to see different ways

fathom walrus
#

nah its the same method, just a textbook explanation lol

gentle trout
#

.close(cool)

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @gentle trout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

fathom walrus
#

lol thanks for the (cool)

#

🦦

vital surge
#

do not use linear system

#

do not use polynomial interpolation

#

use method of finite differences

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vital surge
#

k

final saddleBOT
vital surge
# vital surge use method of finite differences

notice ur given x-values -2, 0, 2, 4, 6 satisfy an arithmetic progression
then, u may apply method of finite differences

so, set up figure that looks like this:
(each successive row is determined by finding the "difference" between the two terms above)

x-values -2     0     2     4     6
y-values  ?     1     15    133   427
             ?     14    118   294
                ?     104   176
                   ?     72

then, this method tells us that the bottom question mark is a 72. by finite differences, this is because the 4th row from the y-values must be a constant as we are dealing with a cubic

then, complete the figure as follows:

x-values -2     0     2     4     6
y-values  19    1     15    133   427
            -18    14    118   294
                32    104   176
                   72    72

hence, p(-2) = 19

#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vital surge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

vital surge
final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

final saddleBOT
#

@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?

zenith pollen
#

all the answers are true so we need an image of those postulates

#

also I need the skullcry emoji

final saddleBOT
#

@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?

brave forge
#

@zenith pollen how genius

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

plucky obsidian
final saddleBOT
plucky obsidian
#

4.8/2.5=9.7/MN MNx4.8=24.25  MN=5.05

#

are my ans

#

corect

#

guys pls i need help fast

final saddleBOT
#

@plucky obsidian Has your question been resolved?

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tidal idol
#

Need help with (b). Thanks in advance

final saddleBOT
#

@tidal idol Has your question been resolved?

final saddleBOT
#

@tidal idol Has your question been resolved?

tranquil pine
#

you should first use partial fractions to expand out f(z)

tidal idol
tranquil pine
#

oh wait i misread

tidal idol
#

So it becomes 1/(u+1) + 2/u, and for the first term can be expanded into (1 - u + u^2 - u^3...) I think. And that's the final result?

tranquil pine
tidal idol
#

2(z-2)^-1 + (1 - (z-2)^-1 + (z-2)^-2) + ...)

tranquil pine
#

that doesnt feel like it would make sense

tidal idol
#

How so?

tranquil pine
#

one sec ill try writing it out

tidal idol
#

Alright

#

Did you find the solution? @tranquil pine

tranquil pine
#

as the help channels are usually meant for highschool level content

final saddleBOT
#

@tidal idol Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @tidal idol

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frosty swift
#

Using the double angle formula find the exact values of cos 15

frosty swift
#

cos 30 = 2 cos ^2 15 - 1

#

root3/2 = 2 cos^2 15-1

#

cos 15 = root(root3 - 1 / 4)

#

where'd I go wrong? or is it the wrong formula

#

i know we can use compound angle identities, cos (45-30) = sin45sin30+cos45cos30

wintry kindle
#

how did you get root(root3 - 1/4)

frosty swift
#

but is compound angle identities the same as double angle formula?

frosty swift
#

cos 30 = root 3/2

wintry kindle
#

solve stepwise

frosty swift
#

root3/2 = 2 cos^2 15 - 1

#

okay

wintry kindle
#

yop continue

frosty swift
#

root3/2 +1 = 2 cos^2 15

#

(root3/2 +1) / 2 = cos^2 15

#

root ((root3/2 +1) / 2) = cos 15

wintry kindle
#

yop

frosty swift
#

root ((root3 +1) / 4) = cos 15

#

is that right?

wintry kindle
#

no

frosty swift
#

what can I write root ((root3/2 +1) / 2) as?

wintry kindle
#

do you need to rewrite it?

frosty swift
#

cant I do root ((root3 +1) / 2 * 2)

frosty swift
wintry kindle
#

is it root(3)/2 or root(3/2)

frosty swift
#

former

wintry kindle
#

k well then the +1 becomes +2

#

since you exclude /2 from the brackets

#

root(3)/2 + 1 = 1/2 * (root(3) + 2)

frosty swift
#

HUH

wintry kindle
#

what's confusing you :D

frosty swift
#

wait

#

OH

#

that makes sense

wintry kindle
#

so you get root((root(3)+2)/4)

frosty swift
#

i had to write it down on paper

wintry kindle
#

but in essence the root(3)+2 term will hinder you from further simplifying I think

frosty swift
#

oh

#

so after root ((root3/2 +1) / 2) = cos 15

#

what should I do?

wintry kindle
#

prob nothing

frosty swift
#

sweet

#

also, this is called the double angle formula right?

#

and compound identities is (A+-B)?

wintry kindle
#

Ys, since you used cos(2A) = 2cos²(A) - 1

frosty swift
#

sweet, but then how do we do tan 15?

wintry kindle
#

note tan = sin/cos

frosty swift
#

sin 15/cos 15

#

okay so ill like try it

#

oh wait

wintry kindle
#

yop

frosty swift
#

i feel like im gonna go horribly wrong

wintry kindle
#

In case the fraction isn't easy to simplify you can also try tan(15) = tan(45-30)

frosty swift
#

im trying to solve it through double angle

wintry kindle
#

k then the before method

frosty swift
#

sin 30 = 2 sin 15 cos 15
1/2 = 2 sin 15 cos 15
1/4 = sin 15 cos 15
1/ 4 cos 15 = sin 15

#

is that right?

#

cos 15 = root ((root3/2 +1) / 2)

wintry kindle
#

neat

frosty swift
#

okay so, do I replace cos 15 into sin 15?

#

1/4 ( root ((root3/2 +1) / 2)) ?

#

(1/4 ( root ((root3/2 +1) / 2))) / root ((root3/2 +1) / 2) = tan 15

#

this looks disgusting omdifnm

wintry kindle
#

and therefore sin15 / cos15 = 1/(2*(root(3)/2+1) after you insert

#

don't worry since you multiply roots

#

You can combine them

#

rootX * rootX = X

frosty swift
#

sweet okay wait ill write it on paper

wintry kindle
#

I'll hint that you can get rid of the fraction entirely

frosty swift
#

THIS IS so ew

wintry kindle
#

:]

wintry kindle
#

= 1/(root(3)+2)

#

= [magic...]

#

= 2 - root(3)

frosty swift
#

WAOAH WHAT

wintry kindle
#

experiment with it 🦑

#

gtg but wish thee gl

frosty swift
#

THANK YOUUU

final saddleBOT
#

@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frosty swift
#

find tan 15 using double angle

final saddleBOT
frosty swift
#

tan 30 = 2 tan 15/1-tan^2 15

#

1/root3 = 2 tan 15 / 1-tan^2 15

#

what next tho

final saddleBOT
#

@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?

frosty swift
#

GOT THE answer for this one

#

another question

#

Given that cos A = 1/2 and A lies in 4th quadrant, find value of cos of A/2, sin of A/2 and determine in which quadrant the < A/2 lies.
Cos A/2
cos A = 2cos^2 (A/2) -1
1 + 1/2 = 2 cos^2 (A/2)
3/4 = cos^2 (A/2)
+- root3/4 = cos (A/2)

Sin A/2
Cos A = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = root 3/4 - sin^2 (A/2)
-root1/2 + root 3/4 = sin^2 (A/2)

#

is this okay? and where do I go after this?

midnight sparrow
#

So what IS A here

frosty swift
#

im not suree

midnight sparrow
#

Try

frosty swift
#

A is the angle in 4th quad?

midnight sparrow
#

Yes so what IS the angle A

frosty swift
#

UM

#

Cos A = 1/2

#

so 60?

midnight sparrow
#

Not exactly

frosty swift
#

UM

#

i dont get it

midnight sparrow
#

So with cos A = 1/2 WE have A = pi/3 or A = -pi/3 right ?

frosty swift
#

ya

midnight sparrow
#

Knowing that A is in 4th quadrant what IS A ?

frosty swift
#

UM

#

pi - pi/3?

midnight sparrow
#

?

frosty swift
#

2 pi / 3?

midnight sparrow
#

Why

frosty swift
#

IS IT NOT

midnight sparrow
frosty swift
#

yeah

midnight sparrow
#

So A can't be 2pi/3

frosty swift
#

okay

midnight sparrow
#

So what IS A ?

frosty swift
#

A IS - pi/3

midnight sparrow
#

👍

frosty swift
#

YAYO MG

midnight sparrow
#

What is A/2 ?

frosty swift
#

-pi/3 / 2?

midnight sparrow
#

👍

#

Which IS ?

frosty swift
#

1/2

#

HELP

midnight sparrow
#

?

frosty swift
#

I didnt write that

midnight sparrow
#

-pi/6 right ?

frosty swift
#

-pi/6

midnight sparrow
#

👍

#

Now you need to know cos -pi/6 and sin -pi/6 and it's done

frosty swift
#

WHAT IS THIS METHOD

#

I WAS TRYING TO USE THE OFRMULA 😭 😭

#

ive just been blindly following the formula lmao

midnight sparrow
#

It's good to use formula sometimes but when you don't know what to do draw a picture Can help sometimes

frosty swift
#

i got it like conceptually

#

but i still dont know how to apply the formula

#

im pretty sure its wrong but idk why

midnight sparrow
#

Do exercises and you will know what to use don't worries

frosty swift
#

OK BUT IN TERMS OF FORMULA

#

im doing something terribly wrong

#

and idk what

#

Given that cos A = 1/2 and A lies in 4th quadrant, find value of cos of A/2, sin of A/2 and determine in which quadrant the < A/2 lies.
Cos A/2
cos A = 2cos^2 (A/2) -1
1 + 1/2 = 2 cos^2 (A/2)
3/4 = cos^2 (A/2)
+- root3/4 = cos (A/2)

Sin A/2
Cos A = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = - root 3/4 ^2 - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = 3/4 - sin^2 (A/2)
sin^2 (A/2) = 3/4 - 1/2

final saddleBOT
#

@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?

frosty swift
#

<@&286206848099549185>

tranquil pine
#

is A in 0 to 2pi

frosty swift
#

ya?

#

i mean i understood A = 60/-60

#

but idk how to do through formula, where am i fucking up

tranquil pine
frosty swift
#

OKAY ya could be that too

#

BUT LIKE LOOK AT THE FORMULA

#

why cant i solve through formula

#

actually no, it is 300 cus its 4th quadrant

#

which is -60

tranquil pine
#

what about 660

frosty swift
#

but where am i going wrong in formula

#

HELP

#

OKAY

tranquil pine
#

i dont have the answer lmao, im more conufused than you B)

frosty swift
#

😭 😭 😭

#

Given that cos A = 1/2 and A lies in 4th quadrant, find value of cos of A/2, sin of A/2 and determine in which quadrant the < A/2 lies.
Cos A/2
cos A = 2cos^2 (A/2) -1
1 + 1/2 = 2 cos^2 (A/2)
3/4 = cos^2 (A/2)
+- root3/4 = cos (A/2)

Sin A/2
Cos A = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = cos^2 (A/2) - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = - root 3/4 ^2 - sin^2 (A/2)
1/2 = 3/4 - sin^2 (A/2)
sin^2 (A/2) = 3/4 - 1/2

#

<@&286206848099549185>

midnight sparrow
#

What's the problem WE already solve that

frosty swift
#

THE FORMULA

#

how do i solve it

#

through the formula

midnight sparrow
#

K first Can you decide whereas it's plus or minus Root 3/4 for cos A/2

tranquil pine
#

acc to his eqn, it should be positive

#

but it can be negative too :v

midnight sparrow
#

No

#

Remember A lies in 4th quadrant

#

WE talk earlier of what IS A but he don't remember

#

I can't help if you make no efforts

tranquil pine
#

why does it matter tho

#

it can be negative

#

A/2

midnight sparrow
#

So what IS A ?

#

WE have litteraly thé value of A

tranquil pine
#

A isnt a single value

midnight sparrow
#

Yeah sure but it can't be 20 for example

tranquil pine
#

its infinite

midnight sparrow
#

So A = x mod 2pi if you want to bé rigorous

#

What is x

tranquil pine
#

A = x |2pi| ?

midnight sparrow
#

Maybe you don't know this notation

#

Hum just Say 1 value of A so

#

You are in high school ?

tranquil pine
#

..

tranquil pine
#

what value are you taking of A?

midnight sparrow
#

What is A pls 😂

tranquil pine
#

its 5pi/3

#

+2pi

#

-2pi

midnight sparrow
#

Yes finally 😂

tranquil pine
#

uh.

#

?

#

i dont get how this proves the value cant be negative

midnight sparrow
#

Cause when WE divide this angle WE got also in the 4 th quadrant so -root 3/4

#

Hum plus sry

#

Calculation seems ok I think

#

Ye all good

tranquil pine
#

what..

final saddleBOT
#

@frosty swift Has your question been resolved?

tranquil pine
#

dont close due to timeout blobcry

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hard mist
#

$ln(p^2+1)=2y$

final saddleBOT
soft zealotBOT
hard mist
#

How do I solve for p here?

#

i can do:

#

$p^2+1 = e^{2y}$

#

but that doesnt help me i think

tranquil pine
#

no.....

#

shouldnt it be e^(ln(p^2+1)) = e^(2y)

#

holy hell so many brackets

soft zealotBOT
hard mist
#

fixed

#

So like this then?

tranquil pine
#

no

#

you need p

#

u have p^2

hard mist
#

yeah i mean ^ is my starting point

#

from there i can solve

#

just needed to get that ln out

tranquil pine
#

yea thats correct

hard mist
#

Ok thanks

#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hard mist

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hard mist
#

I dont know how to continue with this

final saddleBOT
hard mist
#

usually what i do is substitute p' for dy/dx

#

but idk if its dy/dx, dx/dy, ...

#

ah, apperantly i have to replace it by dp/dy

#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hard mist

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

shut helm
#

Hi! How can I prove/disprove that an integer n is a sum of 8 integer cubes? So far all I have tried is trying out different values and since 1 and 0 are part of the cubes list, it seems like almost any integer can be represented as a sum of 8 integer cubes.

versed crater
#

I’m not sure but perhaps something about base 3?

mellow axle
#

Well 2^3 is 8

sturdy cypress
#

or base 2

mellow axle
#

And you can represent any number k between 0 and 7 with k * 1^3

shut helm
#

I am sorry I am a little dense . Then how would I go on with the problem?

mellow axle
#

Well how can you express numbers between 8 and 15?

#

16 and 23?

sturdy cypress
#

what about 23

#

maybe you have to use negatives

mellow axle
#

no no

#

er

#

I see I confused my idea because I was thinking in base 8 after you guys said base 2 lmao

versed crater
#

No that’s not quite right

#

2 in one particular digit?

#

I’m not too sure where I was going, it just sounded like a good idea

sturdy cypress
#

you can't do 23 unless it's 27 − 1 − 1 − 1 −1

versed crater
#

I guess the other 3 are 0’s?

sturdy cypress
#

yeah

#

or 8 8 8 −1

mellow axle
#

So it's known that you can express n as the sum of 5 cubes, but I'm trying to think of there's a nice way to express it as 8 without just using the decomposition for 5 cubes

versed crater
#

Hold up

#

2220 is a cube number in base 3 is it not?

#

,w 2220 base 3 to base 10

versed crater
#

Or not

#

But 2222 is

mellow axle
#

2222 is 80?

#

If 2220 is 78

versed crater
#

No that’s a 4th power

versed crater
#

I think

#

Wait no it’s 80

mellow axle
#

3000 is a cube though

#

Cause it's 1000 cubed

versed crater
#

1000 you mean

mellow axle
#

er 10 cubed not 1000 cubed

versed crater
#

No 10³ is 1000

#

Even in base 3

mellow axle
#

Yeah

#

yea

versed crater
#

What about 11³

#

,w 11^3 base 3

versed crater
#

,calc cbrt(1331)

soft zealotBOT
#

Result:

11
versed crater
#

,w (11 base 3)^3

mellow axle
#

so find an expression for each 6k + r

#

And induct

final saddleBOT
#

@shut helm Has your question been resolved?

shut helm
#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @shut helm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cloud portal
#

Why can you always do multiplication in any order?

nova iron
#

because multiplication is commutative on the set of real numbers

marble agate
#

its also associative

cloud portal
#

But why? What is the proof

hybrid heath
#

there's a number of ways to get there

#

at the root, you want to look at what a Peano System is

#

and you'll need to know proof by induction

#

ultimately though, everything is based on a set of axioms

cloud portal
#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cloud portal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

unique phoenix
#

Hi! I have the following linear algebra exercise to solve:
$A = \begin{pmatrix}
1 & a & b\
0 & 1 & c\
0 & 0 & 2
\end{pmatrix}$. Show A is diagonisable if and only if the polynomial $x^2 -3x + 2$ annuls A.\

I immediately thought about using the characteristic polynomial which should always be annuled by A so I calculated
$\chi (x) = (x-1) \cdot (x-1)(x-2) = (x-1)(x^2 -3x + 2)$ and this got me thinking. Normally we'd only care about the unique roots when looking for roots i.e. since $ (x^2 -3x +2) $ is equal to 0 exactly whenever $\chi (x)$ is equal to 0 we don't care about the extra factor of $(x-1)$. However this only holds for numbers. If you put A into the polynomial, we can still have $\chi (A) = 0$ without necessarily having $(A^2 - 3A + 2I)$ if I am understanding correctly, so how can I prove that $A$ annuls $(x^2 -3x +2)$ if and only if it annuls $\chi (x)$?

soft zealotBOT
#

mippen

unique phoenix
#

.close

final saddleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @unique phoenix

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

final saddleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bold needle
#

how do i approach?

final saddleBOT
terse siren
#

the sequence converges

#

100 seems sufficiently large to just set n to infinite and calculate the limit

bold needle
#

can you speak in layman terms

terse siren
#

it means as n gets bigger the sequence gets closer and closer to one value

terse siren
bold needle
#

oh yes i get that

#

but

terse siren
#

and stop when the 1st decimal place is constant

bold needle
#

but my original idea was to get a bound in terms of n

#

there was another idea i had
generating functions! but i have never used gen functions in recursive relations when its in denominators

terse siren
#

oh

#

you can just calculate the limit though

bold needle
#

i have never calculated limits of recursive relation

terse siren
#

1st step is realizing that it converges

bold needle
terse siren
#

when n goes to infinity

#

a_(n) = a_(n-1) = l

#

then solve for l

pseudo knot
#

I can do it with python, not sure about mathematical solution

terse siren
#

oh wait

#

that doesn't work here

bold needle
terse siren
#

yeah

#

where did I go wrong

bold needle
#

i found a similar problem on mathstack but i didnt get the cruxx of it

#

also idk about the converges part

terse siren
#

oh

bold needle
#

but the sequence sure is increasing

terse siren
#

it doesn't converge

#

it's a harmonic sum situation

#

bruv

bold needle
#

what do i do with it now

terse siren
#

uhh

#

approximate with integral?

bold needle
#

💀
how do we do that

terse siren
#

happy reading

terse siren
bold needle
#

the mathstack had diff approach of bounding idk

terse siren
#

a_n = a1 + 4S + 4/(a1 + S)

#

if my math isn't off

#

where S is the sum of 1/a_k from 1 to k

#

ok this is already complicated

#

okay

#

that's not helpful either

pseudo knot
#

Ok I got it