#help-36
1 messages · Page 85 of 1
if it has 1 it would just be 3
im pretty sure the 0's count as well
So zeros after the decimal count as a sig fig but not 0s before the decimal point
its a bit more complicated than that
0.0054 has 2 sf
but if i just wrote 0.00 then thats also 2
if theres no non-zero after the front zeros, then yes every zero after the point is a sf
@turbid sable Has your question been resolved?
I see
Btw or the very last question what is the calculation to find this out
The distance is 4.068 * 10^13 btw
<@&286206848099549185>
whats the unit
Km
no specific formula, but find how many hours it would take and then divide by 8760 (number of hours in year)
Closed by @turbid sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This isn't a vector right?
Why not?
@next pagoda Has your question been resolved?
i j and k
3 basis vectors
And a x b
Cross product
It could be other things, but it being vectors makes most sense to me
I see
I gussed it might be a vector but there wasn't any notation telling me it was
but that was because this section is all about vectors
.close
Closed by @next pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've never seen that way to compute determinants
oh
I guess I should re read how to perform this
I wasn't aware that the order mattered but I can see that it does!
ty
.close
Closed by @next pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
i thought this was simple like find the sf then time the are but its not and im not sure
well, u gotta understand what similar means
same shape but different size right?
yep
ok
give it some lengths, calculate its surface
and then draw a similar one
and see how it goes
lol idk
idk if u are wrong, but shut up. U dont help anyone spoonfeeding
Woah-
?
can you help me/
Please don't tell people to shut up, you can tell people not to give away the answer in a more polite way
And yeah don't give away answers, try to lead them to the answer themselves
Aight mb
so scale factor is7\
yeah right
whats next how do i relate that to the area
they've given u the area of the smaller one
yes
so try to find the bigger area using the smaller
and given tuff
like u found the relation b/w the sides
now turn the relation of sides into the area
and multiply em
to get the area of the bigger pentagon
Closed by @rancid kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hint: find the circumference of the wire drum
9.424
yeah thats right
What do I do from there?
it's better to express it with its precise value, but that works too
next, find how many times this circumference "fits" in the 150 feet
by the drum
I see
I got it
Thanks
I just have one more problem to solve
oh
u should first try making a diagram
@safe portal Has your question been resolved?
@safe portal Has your question been resolved?
What is the question? @safe portal
This
This one
Closed by @safe portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i get measure of XV
I tried but
Idk what I did wrong , my answer didn’t match up with andwer
I separated triangles
Where is 14 coming from
10+4
XZ has a length of 10, not 14
rip
Closed by @elfin bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this question pls
Show that 3/4 + √7/4 i is a solution for the equation 2z^2 -3z +2 = 0
If someone could help I would appreciate
go to another channel
I could maybe help you if I knew if whom was referring to men or women 😭
i know that this question is a bit ambiguous
but i think its 40% of men
as 'men' was the last subject mentioned
@hidden kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this not true
what im thinking is, cos(5\pi/6) = -1/2, so 2 + 2(-1/2) = 1 for numerator.
then for denominator, sin(5\pi / 6) is \sqrt(3)/2
how should this be written out?
oh yeah, the cos should be -\sqrt(3)/2
sin should be 1/2
so...
4-2\sqrt(3) ?
YEAHH
@final tangle thanks
.solved
Closed by @waxen crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help with this, not sure how to solve for a? like im unsure how to approach this when the bases are 2x2 matrix instead of single column
@lyric nebula Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lyric nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this
so what I was thinking is write is as a summation and try to find a genereal formula for u v and w
are we allowed to use calculus here
if yes, i'd recommend..
uhh what u mean by calculus
isn't that the name of the book
i have no idea what you refer to...
"book" ? this is your resource not mine i have no idea where this problem comes from
i suggested calculus since that is easiest way to do this i believe. but asked since sometimes teachers like to impose tool restrictions
oh calculus is a tool? I was refering to calculus as my book is called calculus so a bit confused
uh
uhm I assume it's prob meant to do like by hand i think
do you know what calculus is?
not realy
but you have a calculus book
I thought it was just math
did you skip to a random page
the book is called calculus
not realy it was just some homework
but it was at the problem plus page
so I assume it's harder then normal
so is this problem part of your homework?
not realy but it was one excercise up so I thought I wanted to give it a try
it would be fairly difficult to do this problem wihout using calculus...
this one needs tool to solve the problem?
I see if I do calculus how do I solve it
like I was thinking e^x = summation of x^n / n! right
calculus is not a "tool" so to speak.. it is an entire branch of mathematics
oh
so like uhm how do I usei t
well i can't teach you calculus in the span of 30 minutes
uh
i'm confused on how you have a calculus book but don't know what calculus is
is this not explained in the book?
don't think so my teacher also never said smth about calculus
but the book is called calculus tho
it's the 9th edition
oh u mean taking dervatives?
I can do that
do you know what implicit differentiation is?
I gotta do that ?
oohh I think I see what u mean
use implicit differentation to uget to u v w
and then just plug it in
wait how do I deriviate the u * v * w part it's like product rule with 3 elements
nvm I think I know it
u get 9 terms right
yes you treat u, v, and w as functions
i don't think so
uh
wait 3 terms right?
u take the partial derivative in each function
so u get 3 terms I think
you would be better off just sending what you have
well I gotta differentaite 3 times right
I just did it once
what is your reasoning for this?
uhm after doing it 1 time I still got 3 * u^2 * u' etc
so like to get u^2 to change to u
no
if you differentiate more, you will only be adding more complicated derivatives of u, v, w to your expression
now look back at what u, v, and w are...
but I still can't plug it in because of the square
if u add them they become e^x I think
right?
that is correct... and what else
that is also right
ok now hold on
look back at what you got after applying implicit differentiation
it's a long expression btw
why is that relevant?
so you have a bunch of squares like u^2 and differentiated terms like u'
yes
is there anything at all you can do with either of these terms
so I guess it has to be to delete the u' someway
like when I do u'
oh wait
I see it
u' = w
right?
v' = u
and w' is v
yes that is good
am I in right direction
and the solution becomes fairly straightforward once you see this
wait
so try complete problem
i stay here if needed
you need to do that
i assumed you already wrote it out because you said it was "long"
I mean the derivative = part
oh I see it
they cancel eachother out
it becomes 0
that is true
how did u knew it so well
did u made this excerrcise before?
and also did u wrote it out or did u do it in ur head everytihng
the most important observation is the cyclic derivatives
not mental...
never mental math for problem like this
always always write with pen/paper or with digital device
I haven't heard of cyclic derivatvies
u use pen/paper or digital device?
wdym
it doesn't matter what is used
my point is when doing problems it always helps to write out your work
i would never attempt a problem like this mentally unless i was very confident in my method
this is not a real topic btw... i just call it "cyclic derivative" because that is exactly what it is
the derivatives of u, v, w are "cyclic" with each other
I see but I feel like problem like these the hard part is to come up with doing the implicit differntation but I couldn't see that
yes that is true
cyclic with eachother as in the derivative of one is the expression of another
yes
I see
"cyclic" in math is a word with a somewhat loose meaning
if things sort of go in a loop, you can refer to just about anything as "cyclic"
although sometimes for harder problems there is not much better solution than "this sort of makes sense? but i don't know. so, i try it and see what happens"
ye I was also trtying but this chapter was about series and u v and w added to eachother is e^x so I thought
it had to do smth with e^x
maybe there is a good way of doing this problem using a series interpretation
but that sounds hard / strenuous
if this problem is in chapter with series then maybe it is true
but it is also possible they just put this problem in a series chapter because the problem involves series
ye most of times there are multiple ways but ye I am just satisfied if I know 1
ye but it's also in the problem plus section
so most of times it's not just easily doing 1 step
interesting
anyways I appreciated the help, saved alot of frustration lol
@foggy fable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the integration of x^3 is x^4/4
3^4 is 81
81/4 - 0
81/4 is multiplied by 1/3 (1/b-a) for MVT
But that gave me the wrong answer 🙁
I deleted the other one
you have to find the value of c
Yeah I got 81/4 after doing that
But it was wrong
These are the answers
I'm not sure what I did wrong
still cant see it >
What did I even do wrong
?
your integral gave you 81/4 then you multiplied by 1/3
and you get
27/4
and then you have what i wrote for you
f( c ) = c^3
Ohhh
That's what I forgot to do
Multiply by the 1/3
smiles
Thank you so much!
yvw)
.close
Closed by @cunning spade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i tried to do it but idk what to do
i got the force of the weight of the beam i think
or wait no
i got the torque of it
i think
idk
actually i think i got nothing
@fallen comet Has your question been resolved?
@fallen comet Has your question been resolved?
@fallen comet Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fallen comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I factor this
Do you know the quadratic equation?
Have you been taught the AC method?
It's basically multiply by 3 here
No clue what that is
You get (3x)^2 - 2(3x) - 15 = 0
I only know the box method
I’m lost in the sauce rn
I skipped a few steps
Okay so if you multiply everything by 3 what do you get?
3x^2-6x-15=0?
You need to multiply 3x^2 by 3 too
So 9x^2
Now notice 9 is a perfect square
So 3x × 3x = 9x^2
(3x)^2 = 9x^2
Npnp
@sacred egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sacred egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where did (-4) * 3^n come from?
The particular solution
It has to be in the form constant * 3^n
Cause when you sub n + 1 and n + 2 you also get multiples of 3^n
so we have xn^p= an^3?
Npnp
.close
Closed by @final venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure what the easiest way to go about this is
@long ether Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @long ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me proove this
i asked in the other channel ive been waiting 40 mins no one
Because Angle 1 is congruent to angle 3
So Angle 1+2=Angle 3+2
So angle AED must be congruent to angle BEC. (it's just like adding numbers together, for example, if a=b then a+c=b+c)
Set the price of that item before discount is x. We have the following equation:
x-20%*x=60
=> x-0.2x=60
=>0.8x=60
=>x=60/0.8=75
So the price of the item before discount must be $75.00.
@waxen thistle Has your question been resolved?
Thank you!!
you're welcome, close this channel
It's not my channel anymore. It's @waxen thistle s channel
oh yea
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this question pls
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@hidden kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo can someone tell what the pattern is when u keep multiplying multiples of 2 by 2 i know the last digit will always be 2,4,8 or 6 but theres more to it no?
like whats the rule
Let's say we have 2^x
If you divide x by 4 and get a remainder of 1, the ending digit is 2
If you divide x by 4 and get a reminder of 2, the ending digit is 4
If you divide x by 4 and get a remainder of 3, the ending digit is an 8
If you divide x by 4 and get no remainder, the ending digit is a 6
@vocal coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
then what would the rule be?
@vocal coyote Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@vocal coyote Has your question been resolved?
oh sorry i miss understood it
Closed by @vocal coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im back,
Sorry,
I dont understand how the red works
How they got -2 to become a positive
logic is a crucial part of maths
X??
If the question requires it, sure. But n is always positive since it's just the number of terms
n is a seires and its always +tive
n is obviously greater than 0
You wanted to say n is odd ig
It would have been a contradiction if (n-1) were odd
But you can't reach that without making the right assumptions
Right
They wanted you to make that observation
Your right side is positive, you have to assume left side is positive to move forward
^^yep
Ok, just because im a bit new to 'making observations' as I never rlly had to do that
How would the question be formated
To make +2 into a -2
Nvm now youll be able to do that
is it just if its -1024?
Split the (-1)^(n-1) from the term and use words like they did in the comment
Ya
Had it been -512 instead
Then you would have -2^(n-1)
And that would have checked out
There, n-1 would be 9, n would be 10
ok this is very interesting to me
Ill have to do a few more questions on this
to understand properly
It's still correct what you did, but in the end you have to be careful about it, if it magically ended were n-1 = 11, then that's broken
Obviously it won't happen in this case
Yeah, you'll pick it up, it's not too tough
No problem
.close
Closed by @tired knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what am i doing wrong?
missing an x?
show work
your approach to pfd is incorrect
A(x-1) + B(x+1)
won't result in a quadratic with constants A,B
also doesn't show how you ended up getting the value of 1/2 and -5/2
first recognise that the degrees of the numerator and denominator are the same,
so you should first start with long division
yes. and then you do pfd on remainder/divisor
@fossil bronze Has your question been resolved?
Is it 1 and -2x+3 as the remainder?
yes
now i can intergrate i see using partial?
@fossil bronze Has your question been resolved?
I got an answer but I am unsure whether it is right or wrong?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fossil bronze Has your question been resolved?
if you have work show it
none of us will know either
and will be unable to advise you on what to do next
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what would be the double integral to evaluate the volume inside all the functions?
it is a supermario kar road ?
no tf
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
Why is your z coordinate parameterized in 2 different ways?
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
What is this program?
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
.
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
you can also use https://desmos.com/3d to graph the functions
first, the x bounds
the lower x-bound and the upper x-bound are at the corners where all three graphs meet
so z = 1 - x^2, z = y, and y = x^2 - 3
1 - x^2 = z = y = x^2 - 3
1 - x^2 = x^2 - 3
4 = 2x^2
2 = x^2
x = ±√2
so the x bounds are -√2 ≤ x ≤ √2
then, the y bounds
the lower y-bound is y = x^2 - 3
the upper y-bound is the edge of where z = 1 - x^2 and z = y meet
z = y = 1 - x^2
so y = 1 - x^2 is the upper y-bound
so the y-bounds are x^2 - 3 ≤ y ≤ 1 - x^2
then, the z bounds
the lower z-bound is z = y
the upper z-bound is z = 1 - x^2
so the z-bounds are y ≤ z ≤ 1 - x^2
from this, the integral is $\int_{-\sqrt2}^{\sqrt2}\int_{x^2-3}^{1-x^2}\int_{y}^{1-x^2}\dd{z}\dd{y}\dd{x}$\
or $\int_{-\sqrt2}^{\sqrt2}\int_{x^2-3}^{1-x^2}((1-x^2)-(y))\dd{y}\dd{x}$
mtt07734
@fleet maple Has your question been resolved?
The owner is missing!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a quick integral question
I just did it by hand then inputted it into Mathway and got the same answer but web assign says it’s wrong
Is there something I’m doing wrong or is there another way to write this answer

Nvm lmao I typed 366 instead of 336
.close
Not sure about this, but maybe 6 is a cause you’re going up the same amount as the others but you’re also moving in x more
Hello, how are you? Excuse me if my English is not so good. Can someone explain to me the properties of logarithms, exponential functions, logarithmic functions and radical functions?
plis
is cos(-x) just going to be -cos(x)
ye
so its considered an even function rite
wb sin(-x), is that also equal to -sin(x)?
uh i’m not sure I just know -cos(x) = cos(-x)
put it in #1021175428326633542
I beilieve it is even tho
since the graph is symmetrical across the y axis I believe
sin would also be an even function I believe
even more broken bot 😦
uh oh
much nicer when it was just not adding new channels lol
wait a second it might be fixed actually
No
cosx is an even function
Meaning cos(-x)=cos(x)
sinx is an odd function, so sin(-x)=-sin(x)
,rotate
what the fuck
samething i said and its on my alg 2 exam 😭
what are b and c?
alright
so
lets look at the numerator first
its cube root
if you express that as an exponent
what would that become?
3y^3 cube root(y^2 x^2 sqrt(x))
huh
ooh
okay
i was thinking you could express it as
$(27x^5/2 y^5)^(1/3)$
ugh weird ass bot
but u get what i mean
ye
now u can write that as pretty much
(27x^5)^1/3 times (y^5)^1/3
correct?
thats that for now
mk
now look at the denominator
if a power comes from denominator to numerator
what happens
<@&286206848099549185> need an individual to help the lad i gotta dip
Sorry to bother you but do you know why there's hardly any available math help? There's 1 vacant but it says owner is missing
Not quite sure as such
can you help
With what
algebra 2
how do you make this -r(x)
@young coral Has your question been resolved?

Closed by @young coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help
idk where to start
@grave oyster Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what would answer be
@pseudo nymph Has your question been resolved?
Consider n=3, we have 1 way
n=4 we have 3 ways
n=5 we have 7 ways
For each n, we can build into subcases
For n=4, we have the sub case that 111 is at the end or beginning or at the end
Consider it at the beginning first
Then the last value has 2 choices (either 1 or 0)
Now considering what I said before, if 111 is at the end, remember it cannot start with a 1 otherwise we double count so there is 1 way
So for n=4, there are 2+1= 3 ways
Now for n=5, consider 111 at the very beginning, we get 2^2 ways to choose the end
If 111 was in the middle, considering the previous sub case we have to exclude the cases that have 1 at the beginning (since we already counted them), so 0 must be at the beginning and the end must have 2 ways
how is there 3?
1110, 1111 and 0111
Continuing from here, with in mind of the previous sub cases, if it ends in 111, remember it cannot have 1 and 1 at the beginning since we already counted that, so both beginning digits are 0 and 0 so we count this as 1 way
Yes
From there, the total number of ways for n=5 would be 4+2+1=7
So we previously saw that for n=4, it would be 2+1 and for n=5 it would be 4+2+1
The intuition here is that you keep on adding a power of 2 to the previous number, (particularly 2^(n-3)
So for n=6, it would essentially be the n=5 case and then plus 2^3=8
So 7+8=15
Notice that this is 2^(n-2)-1 for any n if you use the geometric series formula
So basically tn = 2^(n-2)-1
Here for t=5, we get 7, and t=6, we get 15
So this formula is correct
Now we can substitute this formula into each of the options and find which one is mathematically correct
Sorry, for my longwinded explanation, I am sure that there is a very simple way
I just wanted to derive a formula for Sn in your question
If you need any clarification, personally dm me because I gtg now, but I hope u find this somewhat helpful
And I hope someone else can give a simpler way as to how the recursion works for this problem!
cyaaa
ok thanks
@pseudo nymph Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
your inverse function doesn't look right
if you plug in an x greater than 5 then you're taking the log of a negative number
@thorny coral Has your question been resolved?
this look better?
looks ok now
thanks for the help man it was correct
nice
.close
Closed by @thorny coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lol
.close
Closed by @dusky marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @dusky marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @dusky marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @dusky marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Closed by @dusky marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
<@&268886789983436800>
@dusky marten dont abuse help channels
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got stuck on this question:
This is what I did:
$$y=e^{2t}v$$
$$y'=e^{2t}v'+2e^{2t}v$$
$$y''=e^{2t}v''+4e^{2t}v'+4e^{2t}v$$
BigPenguin
After that, I plugged in the corresponding y, y', and y'' to get:
$$e^{2t}(tv''+4v'+8v)$$
BigPenguin
After that, I have no idea how to proceed.. apparently they say that the v' term is supposed to disappear if you do it correctly, but I triple checked my work and it always appears in the end? WHAT DID I DO WRONG!!!
THIS IS DA QUESTION
what program is this?
this is LWTech HW
community college HW
dw I get 99 tries
I can show snip
Canvas!
can you please help me 🥺
I showed my work!!!!
WITH LATEX
😭
relax i'm reading rn
omg yayyy
I am going to redo this problem from scratch!
i just tried it and the v term cancels for me, your 8v is wrong
in the meantime
i was thinking
wait what
something was wrong with his eqn
lemme reread
wait is the first latex thingy I wrote correct tho?
when you plug in all your crap, the terms involving v have this coefficient:
4t e^(2t) - (4t + 4) 2e^(2t) + (4t + 8) e^(2t)
and that equals zero
shouldn't the v' cancel out, or just the v?
lemme get my paper
my recollection of ode's is very slight, i had to look up the method
but according to paul's online notes:
first example here: https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/classes/de/ReductionofOrder.aspx
YOU ARE RIGHT
nice
$$te^{2t}v''-4e^{2t}v'$$
BigPenguin
that is da final thingy I got
ohhh so v drops out, not da v'
and then i guess you do something like let u = v'?
right
to turn it into a afirst order equation
I GET IT
that way
in u
oh my god how are you so smart yall
I'm so jealous
I wish I could steal your brain
nooo i need my remaining brain cells
i mean i'm lookin at a book rn
aight lemme do dis rn
wait is it better to do my work on paper
or latex
i just googled reduction of order ode and it took me to paulie's
sometimes google is the brain you need
🫡
personal preference of course
i like to do latex unless there's much drawing/sketching/plotting involved
u=t^4
gotchya
we usually skip reduction of order. that being said, you may find this useful in other problems. this is a general formula for finding the 2nd solution when you have the first one:
what do you use?
like is there a fancy pancy latex website to notes thingy
this seems so complicated
I think i'm just gonna forget it after a week haha
I'm gonna use the Bungo strat
well i'm sure there are such things (like overleaf?) but i'm old school, i just have a local installation of texworks/miktex
and not memrozie da formulas
yeh that's fine. it comes from the base equation:
that's not necessarily the optimal strategy, it's just my workaround for being very bad at memorizing things haha
so it won't always work
big penguin big heart haha
so true lol
wait guys
tragic news
it said I got the problem wrong
😭
wait lemme show you my work
WITH THE MAGIC OF
latex
uh oh, the pressure is on
$$te^{2t}u'-4e^{2t}u=0$$
BigPenguin
(we turned it into a first order equation)
i suppose you can cancel out those e^2t's
$$\frac{u'}{u}=\frac{4}{t}$$
BigPenguin
and then you have to stop procrastinating and actually solve a differential equation 😭
shush you are stealing my thunder
$$u=t^4$$
BigPenguin
$$v=\frac{t^5}{5}$$
BigPenguin
BigPenguin
hold up
WE GET
mhm
so once we get this
we integrate both sides
ln(u)=4*ln(t)
u=t^4
i fast forwarded past the boring parts and plugged in your t^4 and saw that it worked and happiness ensued
LOL
from all of the way up here!!!
so that means that the FINAL ANSWER
dun dun dun
should be t^5/5*e^(2t)
BigPenguin
YAY
but it said that I got the problem wrong when I plugged this in : (
see I remember from trauma cause' a couple problems back I forgot to plug it in and then spent 30 minutes crying trying to figure out what i did wrong
"give your answer in simplest form (ie no coefficients)" - might this be a clue?
haha
thank uuuuu
the perils of software-graded assignments
I hope you win your game 😎
I miss linear algebra
so much cleaner
AND BEAUTIFUL
than diff eq
well except manually doing row reduced echelon form
linear algebra is so nice and tidy compared with horrid differential equations
XD
wait, the third part automatically follows the second part right?
yeh showed em that earlier XD
wait would I not have to memorize the third part of this thingy?
all right, this has been a joy, but i'm overdue for hitting the hay
enjoy the rest of your ode assignment haha
that is like saying "enjoy the rest of your torture"
smh
very much like that
cheers
I don't understand what the triple equal sign with the slash through it means
i jsut wrote a formula for the general solution of any such equations like yours, when you have known one of its solutions
y_1 is yours
and y_2 is seen in general form
since he general solution ius a lineaer combination
it is based on wronskian
so y_2 is everything
behind C_2
this triple sign fo equality means = identity
👀
okay I got this
so y_1 (the initial solution that we are given) can be derived by the second equation in your three-equation thing, correct?
you did very well with yoru way too, this what iw rote you can use everytyime if you need some very fast thing
like we get y(t)=y_1(t)*integral stuff
where does the y(t) go exactly?
direclty to the initial equation of yours
ohhhh got it
i omitted al details here just gave you final thing
yah makes sense
but it works great if you make such quick tests
the only confusion remaining is where did z(t) come from?
that is new vairable , i wud cal it as helpful one, or auxialiry one
you can usse other letter
look:
such 2 order eqautins
ohhh I think I did v(t)
comes to 1 order euqstions
but for you, z(t)
yes
coem sto 😭
wait I am going to copy paste this into my notes
Thank you so much Joanna!!!
< 3
yvw)
@hoary oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for the at what time does the rock hit the ground
Idk what to do after this
Because I used quadratic function which gives 0 = -16t^2 + 20t -875
And there’s no solution
not sure why you designated the starting height as 875 feet below the ground but it certainly couldn't hit the ground from below like that
?
plugging in t = 0 gives a starting position of -875 feet, i.e. 875 feet below ground
ahhhhh
right tyty
