#help-36
1 messages · Page 83 of 1
this is how the book proved the same statement previously
manipulating sides independently is the same thing as starting from one side and getting the other
because I could have kept going by transforming 1 to r^0 for instance
That’s okay, the manipulations were independent
they didn’t set the two sides equal and deduce a true statement
i see so that's why they explicitly say left hand side this right hand side that
but cant you just treat this like a shortcut for independently manipulating the left hand side and right hand side?
like you're just putting the equality in advance
that’s what you would think, but the book provides an example as to why you really don’t want to do that
in this case, it was true, but it need not always be
especially when the equalities are not between numbers, but weirder objects
then you can run into serious trouble if you start with the equality
alright so then to prove equalities, i could either:
- to start from one side of the equality, transform it to look like the other side
or - to independently transform one side, then independently transform other side, then in the end show that they are equal
is this correct
yes, the two methods are actually identical, just dressed up in different clothes
no problem
.close
Closed by @austere spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Here's how I'm currently trying to work it out:
363570: (units x 9600)+(12 x 3840)
I also can't figure this question out
I just did that now on the calculator and got 'June'
@ebon lance Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@ebon lance Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
-4,-5 find the magnitude and direction
I get the magnification of the square root of 41
n for direction I do tan-1(5/4) to get 51 then 270-51
For some reason it says it’s wrong
.close
Closed by @idle blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@white ether Has your question been resolved?
?
Is my answer correct?
Then I could explain you where you went wrong
Are allowed to do this S(x-y)dx = S -x dy ?
you need the e-function
hmm
well I just know that we are supposed to use subsitution at least for this problem
and I don't see where I went wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
@white ether Has your question been resolved?
@white ether Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help understanding why this "dimension" refers to counting the non-zero elements while other dimension problems i've had seem to be related to counting the linearly independent vectors
im not understanding what dimension is i guess
same with the polynomial one, I thought it's n+1, but in this case its just 6
the dimension of a finite dimensional vector space refers to the number of elements in any basis for that vector space
it should be 7...?
answer key says 6
huh. strange
i also dont understand c
and also, in previous problems the dimension has been related to the linear indep columns, so what's going on there
@slow blaze Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Earlier you must have seen matrices playing the role of things that act on column vectors
In this question however, matrices themselves are thought of as elements of a vector space
If it helps to visualize, imagine stretching that 5x5 matrix into a 25x1 column vector
So the space of 5x5 matrices has dimension 25
@slow blaze Has your question been resolved?
i still dont really understand what's going on with these, so in earlier questions I would have a 3x3 matrix for example, and the number of columns with lead variables was the dimension, how is it different now for part b
"the space of all 3x3 matrices has dimension 9" are you okay with this statement, first of all?
No, i think that's where the confusion comes from
cause i mean, a 3x3 matrix is just [a,b,c],[d,e,f],[g,h,i]
let me give you another problem for comparison
i think maybe im confusing rank and dimension
heres a definition i wrote earlier that is correct
That's nine different numbers that can all vary freely
When you have a collection of 9 independent variables, you can call that a vector space of dimension 9
For this particular problem, don't think of a matrix as a linear transformation acting on vectors with a column space and all that. Just think of it as a bunch of numbers
Ok, that's where i think im messing up, thanks
.close
Closed by @slow blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I used the FTC to get -(x/3+6x^2)
but its incorrect and I don't know where I went wrong
You need to apply the Chain Rule.
but isnt the derivative of x just 1
The Chain Rule needs to be applied to sqrt(x).
yeah but the derivative of the inside part is just x
and the derivative of that is 1 right
or am I missing something
Closed by @wild gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
to be honest im reading this and just have no idea what it means or where to even start lol
<@&286206848099549185>
@oblique dome Has your question been resolved?
@oblique dome Has your question been resolved?
@oblique dome Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
theres no diagram but the question explains it
i dont rly know how ur meant to do this
use conservation of momentum twice
in fact, this is a special case called a perfectly inelastic collision
my only question is: are the second and third masses stationary, as my instinct tells me?
they are stationary until they get hit
nice
that makes our lives easier
so let's use conservation of momentum, which i'll abbreviate to COM
do you know the COM equation?
we can do it one step at a time
close
it's actually m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2'
where the ' is just indicating final velocity
read it as "prime"
oh so if theres no second mass is my thing right
so then is this m1v1+m2v2+m3v3=m1v1'+m2v2'+m3v3'
woah, careful there
thats not going to work
because the first two masses stick together first, gain a new velocity while doing so, and then collide with the 3rd mass
as i said earlier, we need to do this in steps
its not possible to rush the calculation
there are a total of two collisions here, so we must apply COM twice
let's start with the first collision, shall we?
looks good to me
okay, so this vf is going to become our new "vi" in the second collision
and the "m1" in our next collision is actually going to be m1 + m2
here
you've missed this
because the combined two masses are colliding with the 3rd mass
not just the first mass, m1
looks good to me, but i would highly advise against using the same variables over and over
if i had to mark this, i'd be very confused by your notation lol
its right, but it makes the life of your teacher harder
it also makes it much easier for you to make a mistake too
even if i put step 1 and 2?
i thought if the grader has the solution they just need to find it
(m1+m2)vi2 + 0 = vf2(m1+m2+m3)
oh i get it
then vf2 = (m1+m2)vi2/(m1+m2+m3)
okk
also, i highly recommend leaving everything in variable form and only plugging in numbers at the very end
it makes physics, especially high school physics, a lot easier to do
ok ill start doing that
do u know how to do this
i think its the same time
if you choose to do any physics in uni, they usually dont give you any numbers to begin with
so its best to get used to it now
wdym?
there are no numbers given in questions
like just variables?
for instance, something like this
this is actually a problem i just solved like 3 hrs ago lol
there are no numbers here
one time we had a question like that on our test i liked that question
thats good
i think i figured this out nvm its the same bc the impulse is the same the force is the same and if the momentum is the same then the time has to be the same because the change in momentum is force times time
she didnt put an answer tho
this is also kind of like that right
should be the same yeah
yes, do you have an answer for this?
wait lemme actually check my thought process lol
2mv=2ft
you'd be right
i'd be too
but i wasnt confident enough to just state my answer without checking lol
is there anything else?
is the 60 degrees in this question relevant?
is there no difference between impulse and momentum if nothing is changing?
cuz then i think its C
the 60 degrees is indeed useless
it only matters if you wish to state the direction of the resulting momentum vector
they fr trying to trick me
if your only concern is the magnitude, then no
the word "magnitude" does show up in this question
so that's your clue
now, if they wanted you to find the momentum in the x/y direction, then the 60 degrees would be relevant
60% of a physics problem is understanding wth is going on lmao
see im worried on my test that shes gonna give us some problem where i have to remember something from another unit
physics is only seperated from math by that one point
invidivudally usually im ok but she always brings stuff back
from like kinematics and stuff
and then i lose the question
this is very common, and very important to know too
imo, one should not forget the older, more foundational units
especially not kinematics/dynamics
and conservation of energy
that too
i dont really forget it i just dont remember how to use it
i know it can be difficult to remember everything, but the truth is that there arent many interesting physics problems that dont integrate other units, especially in hs
the most fun i've had in physics in hs was from topics like charge deflection in a parallel plate capacitor
because it called back kinematics and dynamics along with using concepts in E&M
we didnt learn e and m yet
yeah ik
thats normal, but unfortunately theres not much to be done about it
you simply have to be comfortable with the foundations of the older units
you may not need to remember all of the specific details, but the basic principles cant be lost from unit to unit
do you have any other concerns?
no worries
i understand this problem but do u know how come
the velocity of the center of mass at the start is the same as it is at the end
and if its always that way
i didnt write that my teacher did
ah, the velocity of the centre of mass isnt going to change unless theres a net external force on the system
does that make sense?
or would you like a further explaination
i understand
theres only one last thing im worried about
everything else is good
theres these kind of questions
and its very confusing to me
okay, whats the issue?
thy dont stick if its perfectly elastic right
i just dont understand cuz she wrote all of this stuff
and i dont know if im supposed to make a system or something
looks like a derivation of the fact that the sum of velocities before the collision equal the sum of velocities after the collision
and then when im lookig at the work it just seems very confusing
i dont understand at all how she is doing it
oh actually its a bit different
for elastic collisions, there are formulas that are equivalent to doing all of the hard work actually
i see she used the m1v1 +m2v2 = m1v1' +m2v2'
yikes
these are the shortcut formulas to the whole system of equations stuff
elastic collisions are annoying in the sense that you either have to solve a system, or else remember these formulas
i prefer the formulas
but if you must, you may solve the system
i think it will bee asier to remmeber to do the system
ok i understand it now
i feel like the questions on the test are not gona be tlike these though
every time on the test the questions are different
in my experience, the test questions for hs physics usually seem harder/different, but if you really understand the basic ideas of the unit and all of the ones previous, no problem is unapproachable
are there any other concerns you have?
not realy im gonna just keep practicing
i should probably sleep but if i sleep im gonna not practiced enough
i have like a problem focusing and then i do everything in the last minute
i would not recommend staying up too late
its easy to underestimate how poorly a tired brain performs
and lots of hard life stuff happened recently so its hard to sleep too
it makes the focusing thing worse
well, if you want to go practice, and have nothing else to ask
you can close the channel if you'd like
thanks for helping 🙂
and focus on prepping for your test
im not so good at math and physics stuff
best of luck! i'm sure you'll do well
im a right brained person
honestly, i dont think i am either, but one's willingness to learn is more powerful than we imagine
i actually do so unbelievably well in english and history type subjects without even trying but even if i spend hours to study on math and physics and chemistry i still dont do that well
as long as you are willing to learn, and take intiative in your learning, you'll see better results
i firmly believe that
it's alright if you're not "naturally good" at a subject
all that's important is that you try your best
because that's all you can ask from yourself
it's unfair to yourself to ask of more than what you're capable of
keep that in mind, and dont be too hard on yourself
just doing my best over here too haha
have a good night
you too, i wish you the best of luck on your test
.close
Closed by @fallen comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @fallen comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain why i'm getting a different answer
why is the surd x in the numerator not meant to to 1 over surd x
<@&286206848099549185>
working over here
@buoyant yarrow Has your question been resolved?
im pretty sure you did it right
its just written in a different form
ohk tysm for clearing it up for me
Closed by @buoyant yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no clue where to start
We don't help with exam questions
Question 2 is smart
I am thinking of markov chain
Don't play dodgeball with 3 players lmao
ikr
I would just start to bruteforce it. just go through all the options. there shouldn't be that many
good point. let me try
The problem is if Paul goes out first, the length of the game is unbounded
So your probability space is garbage
but then you notice a pattern probably
markov chains
well if they know what those are and how to use them, sure
i kinda know how to use them but we didn't study them and i feel like it should be much simpler than that
but just from the way this question is worded I would lean to no
Make a tree
By turn 3 only 1 branch goes on
It's most likely geometric and you can find each player's odds
"each player always aims at the most skillful player still in the game"
so if we have just Mike and Bill and Bill is throwing, does he throw at Mike or himself lmao
I wanted to point out the same bad wording
The most skilled besides him
Let's assume reasonable common sense from the players
good point
progress so far
there are 2 ways to get to the same state (Mike; Bill) with Mike's turn

idk how to account for that
yeah precisely
well generally these types of trees shouldnt meet again
just compute the probabilities for each way separately
of course you can reuse parts of the calculation for that
wait wdym
is it wrong
no I just mean that I wouldnt draw it as meeting again
ah okay
you could instead draw it as a whole map of all the possible states and how they relate to each other. but then you are basically in markov chain territory
i see
okay so
OKAY
one by one
i'll start with Bill
since all of these routes are independent, Bill's probability of winning is P(leftmost branch) + 2P(GP) where GP denotes geometric probability (case between Mike and Bill)
it would help to draw a separate tree just for GP
i will
$P(\text{leftmost branch}) = 0.5\cdot 0.7 = 0.35$
0.35
Result:
0.35
oh nvm
artemetra
oooohhh h hh h h hh
okay i figured the values out
Mike winning in GP case is $0.5+0.5\cdot 0.3 + 0.5\cdot0.3^2 + \cdots = \frac{0.5}{1-0.3}$
wait no
huh
ohhh
Mike winning in GP case is $0.5+0.5\cdot (0.5\cdot 0.3) + 0.5\cdot(0.5\cdot 0.3)^2 + \cdots = \frac{0.5}{1-(0.5\cdot 0.3)}$
artemetra
you should be able to set up a simple equation for the probability
you dont need a series
why not
if you call it p, then you should have something like p=prob(other branches)+something*p
well that's what i get on the RHS anyways
so it's fine
$P(\text{mike}) = 0.35 + (0.5\cdot 0.3 + 0.5\cdot 0.7)\frac{0.5}{1-(0.3\cdot 0.5)}$
artemetra
$P(paul) = 0.5\cdot 0.3\cdot 0.5$
artemetra
so $P(\text{bill}) = 1-P(\text{paul})-P(\text{mike})$
artemetra
@stone wagon Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @stone wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im using the quotient rule and idk whats going wrong
i calculated
,tex $ \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{x}{(1+x)^2}
suds
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
but -y^2 is
what is the quotient rule
recall it
derivative of top function or bottom function we find first in the numerator?
f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x) / (g(x))^2
right
so youd get 0- something
so you get a negative right there
where is your negative
bro i am so so sorry
lmao
but 0!
i love math but i do too much of it in a day
i have 2 maths classes and then i go home and do like 2 hrs of work so its like 4hrs of maths
and i have physics and economics which is mathy too
what are you doing rn?
yr 12
SAME
i have phy chem math eng and cs
india
english is compulsory here
im australian
yes here also
but we have
competitive exams
u wanna do engineering?
unfortunately yes
life wouldve been so much easier if i just chose anything humanities related
yes ofc
my nickname in yr 8 used to be rattus mctattus so similar names
SAME my mums a lawyer and im pretty good at that sort of stuff
I WANTED TO BE A LAWYER
MY MUM WANTS ME TO BE A LAWYER
hes right tho
i hate memorising stuff
plus idt i could defend obviously guilty ppl
yeah but my mum does commercial law for like businesses
what if like a mafia boss
targets u
cause u
ruined his business
idk
more like rio tinto tho
he blasts ur family
Closed by @severe cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We haven’t learnt this and I’m stuck
Are you aware of a * a = a^2, and (a^2)/a = a?
Nope
Then that's something to learn.
Okay
$$a \cdot a = a^2$$ $$\frac{a^2}{a} = a$$
Good
I can see the reasoning
Alright, start with this then $\frac{16 \cdot a^7 \cdot b}{(2 \cdot a^2 \cdot b)^5}$
Good
You expand the denominator, divide the common ones out, and continue with $(-2a^3b^2)^2$
Good
Closed by @royal comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats happening between first and second step
they're taking stuff common
because they took the (2t+1)^3*(t^3+1) common and not 8 multiplied by that thing
what?
and not 8 multiplied by that thing
okay they took the common then what
can u please be more specific
okay if you have x^3 + 5x^2 and you take x^2 common, what do you get?
x^2 (x+5)
correct
so now let 2t+1 be x and t^3+1 be y
so what is your equation? 8x^3 * y^2 + 6t^2 * y * x^4
now if you take x^3 * y common, what is left?
so now let 2t+1 be x and t^3+1 be y
.close
Closed by @rancid flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it correct to first integrate on z
and then using polar cordinates for x and y
bu integration on z i get 3sqrt(x^2 +y^2) -1
then using polar coordinates i get double integral of (3r^2 -r)
theta going from 0 to 2pi and r from 2 to 4
but i don't get any of those alternatives
.
you got a 100?
yeah that should be correct
thank you
yes
Closed by @ruby lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
alright im in this calculus class currently stuck on a limits problem.
original problem is
lim x -> -1 x^2+3x+2 / x^2+4x+3
im on the second step where i factored x out from the first part of each side of the fraction
x(x+2)+x+2 / x(x+3)+x+3
i really dont know where to go from here, photomath suggests i factor out x+2 from the expression, but i dont fully understand how that works and turns into (x+2)(x+1) / x(x+3)+x+3
i can take a picture if needed if my typing cant be understood
(x+1) will be a factor
do you get this?
not really
lets say you have ab+b, you can factor b and get (a+1)b
ah ok so i would get uhhh
so to get (x+2)(x+1) i would
to get from x(x+2)+x+2
i factor 1 out of x+2? i dont understand how to get to (x+1) at the end
x(x+2)+x+2 / x(x+3)+x+3 thats where i am right now
right
so
id make it
x(x+2)(x+2) / x(x+3)(x+3)
?
You could have just written a as x
,w x^2 + 3x + 2
yes
what is going on 😭
(x+1)(x+2)/(x+1)(x+3)
@compact breach plz delete the Wolfram alpha it's getting messy
x(x+2)+x+2 / x(x+3)+x+3 is where i am at
i am confused as to how we get to x+1 from x+2 and x+3
without making it like x(1+3/x)
replace b by x+2 here
and a by x
with parentheses around x+2
on god i still dont understand it im not trying to be difficult
tbh I might be a bad explainer but I have no idea how to explain it more
so what am i trying to factor out of x+2
The one is there because if we have (x+2) then behind it there's a 1 no matter what because anything times 1 = itself
okay i get that
but my assumption is to factor out x to make it (1+2/x)
thats incorrect though right
x(1+2/x)
Send the original thing again please
I will probably need to leave in a minute my bus stop is soon but maybe someone else can help
thats the original problem
this is the step i am on
i am wondering how to get to this point (i photomathed it)
obviously you cancel the xs on top and bottom at the end but how do i get to that pointis what i'm wondering
Do you know how to get here
somewhat yes
you make 3x 2x+x
then factor x^2+2x+x+2
x(x+2) +x+2
thats where i am
Ok with x(x+2)+(x+2) you can treat it like factoring by grouping
i follow you
Then it's equal to (x+1)(x+2) it's really just one step
Remember the one behind x+2
Yeah so you can combine the x+2s if rhey are multiplies by the x and 1 in front of each of the other two parts
You can prove it yourself by expanding the factors
im so real i dont understand
can you put it in like
step 1 step 2
1: x(x+2)+(x+2)
2: combine ___
Ok step 2 identify the factor you see twice, that will be one of the factors you end with
Then step 3 the numbers in front of each of the repeated factors are put together
If you can't understand why expand each step yourself and you'll get what you started with
alright step 2 identify what i see twice
i see x+2 twice
so i just get x(x+2)
and since i have an x in front of that and a 1 in front of the other one i get
(x+2)(x+1)
?
Yes
This never existed though
This is just so you can understandn
but it does exist im so confused
this is the og problem
factor out x from everything
x(x+2) +x+2
x(x+3) +x+3
Yeah you need both x+2 until you finish what I told you
Its one step
That's why putting it in steps is weird
Here is another example
Maybe the colors will help
but why do you cancel the (x-2)s i thought you could only cancel from the numerator and the denominator
what i understand is that if i had like 12(x+2)(x+2) i could just cancel the x+2's?
You aren't cancelling x^2 and 5 are each being separately multiplies by x-2 this is just being condensed
In the example I showed u
They are being added
Not multiplied
Neither of the x+2 are ever being multiplied by each other
Nothing is cancelled you are just rewriting
The + is the 1
yes
Yes
thank you
im still extremely fuzzy on this but
i barely understand it
but i guess i get it?
are there any other examples you can show me with stuff like that
is there a name for that type of thing
I have to go
Closed by @hollow hearth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Would try more
thank you for your help anyways
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi there i was watching this video "can force change the velocity of a particle moving perpendicular to it". it mostly dealt with why centripetal force is able to change the direction of tangential velocity of a particle in circular motion whereas if we have projectile motion, the y-component of force cannot affect the velocity in x.
and i found this comment underneath
Actually the key thing is that when we work with Cartesian coordinates, the motion in one axis is independent of the motion in other axis and that is why in the case of projectile the motion in the x-axis is independent of the motion in the y-axis, so the z-axis velocity remains unaffected. But in the case of circular motion, WE ARE NOT USING CARTESIAN COORDINATES, instead we are using POLAR COORDINATES. In this case also if we use cartesian coordinates, there will be no issue and the motion of different axes will be independent, but it is difficult to use cartesian coordinates in circular motion.
can someone help me understand whats going on
i dont mind linking the video but i think it's a mix between english and hindi so might not be that effective
there is an acceleration vector going inward due to centripetal motion
you are mixing up linear velocity and angular velocity
if you find a vector from a point on the circle to the center youll find it is in the same direction as the acceleration vector
just a quick way to check
oh i am sorry i meant direction of tangential velocity
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil pine
What are you asking, again?
$\vec{a} = \dv{|\vec{v}|}{t}\hat{v} + \omega \cross \vec{v}$
! What the hell am I doing here?
tbh at this point im so confused that idek myself
The first one is parallel to velocity, the other is perpendicular to velocity. This is always true.
why the omega cross v?
Well
oh yes
yes i understand
i understand what you have done here yes
but what difference does it make if we use polar coordinates or not
It doesn't really, it seems like you're paraphrasing and missed their point.
Or they're just not sure what they're saying either.
idk it sounded pretty confident though lol
In something like a uniform circular motion the first component is zero, so it's always perpendicular to the velocity.
In something like a projectile, both of these accelerations are individually variable but their sum is the same as gravitational potential.
I guess that's about I can tell you with given context.
understand
thank you very much
i'll be off for now
you have a good day
.close
Closed by @raven blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi is there a way to solve for the area enclosed by this curve without double integrals?
Double integrals are just integrals of integrals
So solve the first integral of the double integral, then you just have a single integral
how do i set that up for this problem? we havent learned double integrals yet
what if i define a piecewise function
f + g (orange + blue) from 0 - 1
integral of that from 0 to 1
then subtract the integral of the green
<@&286206848099549185>
@devout plaza Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@devout plaza Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
riemann
And integrate the difference
ok but how do i find the top and bottom functions
just randomly adjust x^2 or some trig function till i get it?
time to wait 2 more hours :/
Nothing about this problem is random
you cannot isolate y with y^2 -2xy + x^3 = 0
.
Closed by @devout plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Not on x
Read above
.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i use the direct comparison test to show that the series is divergent
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Close one of your channels
Compare the largest powers of each numerator and denominator
As n gets large, only the highest powers matter
This series is divergent
So how do you show something is also divergent
comparing?
if 1/n is bigger than our original series i know that An and Bn are both divergent
but idk 1/n is bigger
Showing 1/n is bigger than a series doesn't prove anything about the series
@fathom sonnet Has your question been resolved?
i thought that if Bn diverges An also diverges
What do you think An and Bn are
An is the picture i sent, Bn is 1/n?
Yes just show An >= 1/n
but i thought Bn is supposed to be the bigger series
sorry im confused about this whole thing
Read the comparison test again
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me explain how they got these answers? Or what I would do to get to these answers?
@outer dove Has your question been resolved?
@outer dove Has your question been resolved?
no
@outer dove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
ok
revise the properties of parallelogram
@ebon peak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So lokey I don't understand how to do the second part of the problem
We know that, because we cannot divide by zero, that 7t^2-3 != 0
getting us that T0 can't be sqrt(3/7) plus or minus
but I don't get how the found out the y0 part?? Y = 1/6 doesn't break the derivative, just makes it zero?? Why is that bad haha
Solve for y'=0
why is y'0 mean that existence and uniqueness is not guarnteed tho?
No idea what you just said
so the question is asking
?
"Existence and uniqueness is guaranteed at all points except those with..."
and you said solve for y'=0
but why does y'=0 mean that existence / uniqueness is not guaranteed?
Basically I want the intuitive understanding why that is the case, instead of just the formula
You can only find the general solution when y' is not 0 for all t
ohhh I got it
wait so if y' = y * t, would t = 0 and y = 0 be the answer?
?
Did I do something confusing?
No
Answer to what question
If you make up questions and answers, you have to tell me the question if you want me to check the answer
"Existence and uniqueness is guaranteed at all points except those with"
sorry haha my brain it a little bit messed up right now
Yes
so if we had the equation:
y' = y * t
then the answer to "Existence and uniqueness is guaranteed at all points except those with"" would be y = 0 & t = 0
got it!
so to generalize this, "existence & uniqueness" thing holds whenever y' = 0 or Undefined
?
just curious, would existence hold if y' was equal to an irrational number?
"Existence and uniqueness is guaranteed at all points except those with"
wait let me say my question again in one message
Oh sorry!
"theorem:
to figure out the points where "Existence and uniqueness is guaranteed at all points except those with..."
Then we find all points where y' is equal to 0 or Undefined
Would this be correct?
I just wanna generalize your statement to make sure I got all cases covered haha
@hoary oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hoary oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solving for the slope of y=x^3-3x^2+4 at P(2,0) and figuring out the tangent line equation, doesn't -(8-12+4) cancel out to zero, leaving 8 as the sole constant? If so, do we remove the 8 from the numerator somehow? Only turned to gpt after trying to solve multiple times and getting 4/h (undefined slope) when the slope is really 0.
this looks so weird, is it from gpt?
we would recommend not to use gpt for maths
I almost never use it bc of stuff like this lol
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong on my end though using the difference quotient
do you mind showing what you have tried?
no worries, if you dont mind you can show your draft too, but since you are already writing, i bet we dont need the draft now 😛
you can ping me after it's sent 🙂
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @surreal apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i figure out the arc
i have segment BC's length
||notice that ABC is a right triangle||
so?
i knew that, its how i got BC's length
do i use trig ratios?
yes
Closed by @burnt pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
if that is right then notice that angle ABC and ADC are right angles and sum of angles in q uadrilateral is 360 deg
i just used circum angle thm
well that is another thing you can do to get to angle BAD
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Which of the following represents te result of multiplying 3.45 by 2.1 and rounding the answer to three significant figures? a) 7.245 b) 7.23 c) 7.28 d) 7.2
i thought it was b
but when i realize if i calculate it its equal to 7.245
and after i round it to 3 significant figures
it's equal to 7.25
which is not an option
they might just mean 3 decimal places
the question says significant figures though
that dont mean much
it just wants 3 decimals
id just say a and if they say its wrong the other 2 are even worse answers as they are incorrect
7.23 and 7.28 are 3 significant figures
if they said decimal points im sure they would say it
but they are wrong
yes
ah i see
so just put a and if your teachers says your wrong ask them what its supposed to be as it is none of the answers shes given
maybe theyre just tryin to confuse you
or just write 7.25 on the side or something
i don't know if this is a question to confuse, because it's just totally wrong
yeah i will do that for sure
also tell them tomorrow
thanks!
both of you
.close
Closed by @mossy bobcat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the book says the answer for this is (x,y,z)=(-4,2,9)
Im losing my mind because I did this 4 times and I got -6,2,11 every time
can someone else confirm
have you tried plugging in to see if youre correct?
oh. i didnt, one sec
also check your spot on the answer key just to be sure
Closed by @tepid forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Plane Trigonometry! I have no clue how to even start this question.
If I had to describe where my confusion is coming from, it's probably that I don't understand where the x,y coordinates are, and even if I did I would have no idea what to do with them. Can anyone help me work through a problem like this?
the (x,y) coordinates are the points on the circle
this is the "Unit Circle", which has a radius of 1
the points shown are for some special right triangles that are drawn inside the circle