#help-36
1 messages · Page 77 of 1
plug in your function for f(x) then use any limit solving techniques you can to simplify and take the limit
I don't fully understand what you mean, the only function I have is f(x)=2x-5
At first i thought that f(x+) became 2x-5+2h-5 but that doesn't seem to be the case
f(x+h) means substitute (x + h) for every instance of x
similarly to how f(2) means substitute 2 for every instance of x
Okay I think I understand what you mean, in this case it would then become 2(x+h)-5?
yes
Closed by @faint rock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I retried the problem and got it incorrect- why
I suspect something to do with revolution of y axis and x given bounds, (which would then be y- bounds of 8, 10) but that answer is also incorrect
@odd tinsel Has your question been resolved?
@odd tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find these
i think ur right, you're just missing the "-"s because its in q3
For what
For both?
yeah, I havent been in trig or whatever for years but from what I remember the ‘-‘ in your 5pi/4 is indicating that you are ‘going back’, so you look where 5pi/4 is on the unit circle and you can see it should terminate at -sqrt2/sqrt2 for both x,y
Isn’t that for 5pi/4
thats your t, yes
Mine has - in front tho
right, I believe that indicates that its going backwards, idr
Maybe wait until a trig specialist comes but thats what I recall
Its either that or you negate -5pi/4 from the start of the unit circle and see what the new position is
So 360-225*
idr tho irs been years
Well I put it on both and it still says wrong
I changed it to - in the x coordinate and it worked
@quiet garden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Further
How do I simplify this
ln(a)-ln(b)=ln(a/b)
I’m looking to solve in terms of v
Replace a with v and b with t
And also, if ln(x)=y, then x=e^y
.close
Closed by @desert juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to make a formula where I put in two variables and get a third variable out so like r*p=v but I want r to have more importance but v has to be between 0 and 100 and I'm just going in circles
I should clarify
R is an unknown number from 1 to 10 inclusive
P is an unknown number from 1 to 10 inclusive
And v is an unknown number from 1 to 100 inclusive
And when I say r should have more important I mean like
r=5 p=10 leads to a larger number than r=10 and p = 5
If r = 5 it's worth more than if p = 5
Sorry if that doesn't make sense I'm a bit "impaired"
@zenith oxide Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @zenith oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question. Why can you let a variable be equal to sine or cosine of a different variable? Doesnt that only output values between -1 and 1?
in what context?
Yes you can and yes it does
well then that variable will only take on values between -1 and 1
I was integrating sqrt(a^2 - x^2) where it is suggested to let x = asinb
But what if the variable doesnt
Am I not integrating x generally?
if you let x = asinb then x will take values between -a and a and thats when the square root is defined
if x was any other value the output wouldnt be a real number
Sorry im not really understanding. Let's say a is 16. Then I can only make such substitution as long as x is between negative and positive 16?
Ooooooohh
I got that
Thank you
I have no idea how to close a room lol
.close 🙂
Closed by @sly quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I did the question but my book doesnt have answers
so it would be lit if someone could solve this and lmk when they got
I got root 12
nvm ig
.close
Closed by @placid laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you find area under curve for parametric?
solve for y in terms of x
use pythagorean theorem
$\sin^2 x + \cos^2 x = 1$
riemann
do i just add them together then
cos^2(t) + sin^2(t) = (x^2)/4 + y/3?
im kinda confused tho like why can i just add them together
[as an aside, there is another way, in that you can notice what the curve looks like, and use parametric integration]
You know that sin^2 + cos^2 = 1 is an identity, and the fact that you have x = 2cos(t) and y = 3sin^2(t)
and i could just add them?
so having (x/2)^2 gets you cos^2(t) and y/3 = sin^2(t), so adding those gets you 1
Yep, then that one you can e.g. integrate directly 
area formula?
do you have one in mind?
A = int from a to b (top-bottom)
[if you'd like, I can explain this way too if you would like after? If you haven't seen it before]
yes pls
there's no bottom curve tho, so would it just be the y
Yea - if you sketch it out somehow, you should find something like this, so the bottom is just the x axis, y=0
if you didn't know what it looked like, would you just assumed the second ones is x-axis
Well it might depend on the curve I think, but something like this, seeing they say "area under the curve", it's safe to assume the bottom is just the x axis
ohhh okay
if they give you parametrics where one is like sin^2t or cos^2t and then sint or cost, is it safe to just assume you can use pythagorean and add them together
Yea the idea is that you want to try to make use of trig identities where you can (maybe alongside some restrictions on t) to find an explicit equation
So say something like x = sin(t), y = sin(2t) for t between -pi/2 and pi/2, you could use double angle formula and then the fact that for those values that cos(t) = sqrt{1 - sin^2(t)} to get y = 2x * sqrt{1 - x^2}
ahhh i get it
i think i messed up somewhere
😭
i plugged in 0 and pi for a and b in the integral
am i supposed to plug it into x and y values
i realized its t
You want the limits as x values, so find the corresponding x values to those 
[also just realised that the parametric added in the restriction 0 <= t <= 1, it should really be this for t between 0 and pi]
so would it be a negative integral then since -2 or x(pi) is supposed to be on the bottom?
Well you want -2 at the bottom and 2 at the top
You want the lower x value for the bottom and the higher one as the top
yeah but like
pi > 0
but the value when plugged into x
is like -2 and 2
like for ftc before u plug it into u it could be like int from 2 to 3
but after plugging into u its like from -1 to -5
and then u have to turn integral into negative to flip the values?
Note that for the integral here, you already want the smaller x value as the bottom limit and the higher one as the top limit
Say you ignore the whole parametric equations they gave you and that I tell you to find the area under the curve y = (3/4)(4 - x^2) that was sketched here
You'd want to find the integral $\int_{-2}^2 \frac34\pqty{4 - x^2} \dd x$, right?
@tulip coyote
yeah
And here you aren't really doing any substitutions really (other than the rearraging and finding the x values)

Anyways, this should be not too bad to work out I hope 
,w int (3/4) * (4 - x^2), x from -2 to 2
Yep 
Sure thing 
i missed the lesson on this one, but i understand how to find dy/dx
but idk how to find the point
I mean, if they give you theta, you can find what r is from there
What did you find as dy/dx?
Don't worry
thought you already had it, take your time 
[and ping me when you're done!
]
@tulip coyote
Looking good to me! 
Happy with that now? 
As in the radius r given the theta, or the x and y coordinates?
it says to find the equation of the line tangent to the polar
so how would i find the points for the equation
i don't know
if they want it in polar form, I'd probably mess it up tbh 
maybe cartesian form?
I would guess it's polar form they want it in
but if Cartesian, then for that one you just know that when theta is 3pi/2, that r is 6pi and from there you can find x and y
You have dy/dx, the gradient from there, so line equation should be fine from there
ohhh so plug the theta into x and y equation i set
Yep 
so (0, -6pi)
y+6pi = -2/3pi x
ok
i have one more sorry 😭
do i just integrate this?
to find position
ftc
its supposed to say dx/dt = sqrt(t^2 + 3t + 1)
those don't look too easy to integrate 
can use a calculator
In theory integrating the dx/dt and dy/dt would be fine
hmmm, maybe those might help I think if a calc can do it for you, but nonetheless those functions' antiderivatives are a bit something 
should i integrate them separately
like integrate dx/dt from 0 to 2 = x(2) - x(0)
and do the same for the y
to get the position coord?
That would work out at least theoretically
worth trying!
okk
Just so it's neater for me haha, $\dv{x}{t} = \sqrt{t^2 + 3t + 1}$ and $\dv{y}{t} = e^{t^2 - 1}$
@tulip coyote
Gonna take your word for it, you have the right method at least 
Interesting they give it like this, would have expected something a bit nicer and exact 
But otherwise is that all good? 
yes
thank you SO SO MUCH
i understand everything sm better now
Perfect
alsooo do you want that parametric integration thingy explained too? 
yes sure
Cool cool, so basically the idea for parametric integration is that it's basically like doing a substitution, you have that (ignoring limits for a second) $\int y \dd x = \int y \dv{x}{t} \dd t$
@tulip coyote
The first integral, you have the limits being in increasing order of x
The second one, the limits correspond with the t values that get you those
So going back to our example, $x = 2\cos(t)$ and $y = 3\sin^2(t)$, then that is basically saying (putting the limits back in)
[
\int_{-2}^2 y \dd x = \int_{\pi}^0 d \dv{x}{t} \dd t = \int_{\pi}^0 3\sin^2(t) \cdot -2\sin(t) \dd t
]
@tulip coyote
(with the pi being at the bottom because that's what corresponds to the smaller x value, so it looks "the wrong way around", if that makes any sense and I've explained it properly?)
Basically you know like with some substitutions, where if you put them in, like the sizes of the limits change
how are u getting the bot to do that
So like if you had some integral, say $\int_0^1 f(x) \dd x$, if you chose (just for demonstration purposes) $u = 1 - x$, that when $x=0$ you have $u= 1$, and when $x=1$ you have $u = 0$, so then that gets you
[
\int_0^1 f(x) \dd x = \int_1^0 -f(u) \dd u
]
@tulip coyote
If you type LaTeX out, the bot will recognise it and render it for you (basically the stuff between dollar signs in my messages, if you're not used to it - you can see #latex-help for some resourses on it
)
thanks
oh yeah i remember that
it's similar here, it's like the parametric substitution means that when x = -2, t = pi and when x = 2, t = 0
Of course it's kinda like the other way around in that you have the "substitution integral" first, so in general you want to check the order of the limits and then order them according to that(!)
Anyways, back to the above for a moment-
Of course, with a bit of manipulation and making use of that negative, that integral is $\int_0^{\pi} 6\sin^3(t) \dd t$, you can then use e.g. power reducing to get that as
[
\frac64 \int_0^{\pi} 3\sin(t) - \sin(3t) \dd t
]
and then evaluating that should hopefully get the same thing, evaluating $\frac12 \pqty{-9\cos(t) + \cos(3t)}$ between 0 and $\pi$
@tulip coyote
Of course, I'm gonna be lazy and just check with the bot 
That's using the power reduction formula
,w int 6sin^3(t), t from 0 to pi
And it does work out to the same thing 
[in this case, the parametric way is a bit more painful than the direct way, but in other cases the parametric way is much easier]
And I guess it makes a nice example too, cause you can see both ways 
yeaaa thank u
i think i'll stick to pythagorean tho
its interesting to see the other way
Yea, it's just to see another way, and maybe hopefully might be useful if they give you other examples where it's easier to do it like this 
Hopefully everything was useful! 
You too 
.close
Closed by @radiant reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t get it
Someone help pls
when things are similar
their ratio is same
think
corresponding similar sides
have equal ratio
@coarse badger
Yeah, but idk how to find the scale factor
@tardy sigil
you find scale factor by comparing 2 sides on the triangles you know correspond to each other
@coarse badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Whats the point of recursive definitions? like ie for addition, how do you typically find them?
what kind of recursive definitions?
you mean how addition is defined in foundational mathematics?
maybe? like for multiplication, m * (n + 1 ) = (m * n) + m
how else would you define it?
But like, how do you think of these definitions intuitively
its capturing the notion of "multiplication is repeated addition"
intuitively you know m*(n+1) is adding m to itself n+1 times, well that definition is just saying "add it to itself n times" and then add one more m
and then you follow the tower all the way down and finally use m * 1 = m
by the time you've reached the bottom you really have just added m to itself n+1 times
Closed by @fluid steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m trying to figure out the relationship between these numbers, the total pot last year was around 1700 and the payouts were as follows:
700 - 41.1%
375 - 22.05%
260 - 15.3%
210 - 12.4%
155 - 9.1 %
Are there any straightforward methods i can use to figure out why these were weighted the way they were?
@grim glen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Those percents seem to be just the straight proportion of the total
700/1700 = 0.411 = 41.1%
etc
In other words, 700 is literally 41.1% of the pot, if the total pot is 1700
@grim glen
or are you asking why those specific percentages were used instead of something else?
Yeah
I cant seem to find a real reason why they were used that way
Is there a common pattern im missing?
I don't think so. It seems pretty arbitrary
Yeah im looking through all other values and it doesnt seem to be based off anything i can see atm
@grim glen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey so if I wanna find out if a function is homogeneous, I count the degree of each term, and if they're all equal the equation is homogeneous right? okay so what about trig functions like sin(x), what's the degree of x in this case and what about if x is under a root, will it be 1/2?
degree is only defined for polynomials, sin(x) is not a polynomial
so it would have a degree of 0?
undefined, i'd say
i don't think so, unless there's some more general definition of homogeneous
if so, i'm unaware of it
okay what about under a sqrt
sqrt is also not a polynomial
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Closed by @dense badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yea that looks valid
sure, why not?
P(A) = P(A intersect B) + P(A intersect B^c), right?
by disjoint additivity
you're just using a rearranged version of that
(twice)
Closed by @undone kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okie so
y' = e^(x^3) * 3x^2
wouldn't this mean the derivative is INDEPENDENT of y, meaning that for the slope fields, it shouldn't vary for y?
And because the derivative isn't symmetrical when you do x & -x, doesn't that mean it shouldn't reflect?
I got the answer correct (B) BUT IDK WHY
@hoary oxide Has your question been resolved?
This is one differential equation for which y=e^(x^3) is a solution
but it is not the only one
for example y' = y * 3x^2
is also satisfied by y=e^(x^3)
ahhh gotchya
thank uuuu
'rep
idk how to d it
+rep
t!rep
Command: Reputation
By using Tatsu Bot, you agree to follow our rules. View them with t!rules.
To get verified:
- Check if your email is verified by Discord
- Login to our Dashboard once.
Don't worry about it lol
sorry : (
It doesn't really do anything, I didn't even realize it still existed lol
but thanks anyway
@hoary oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hoary oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my answer correct?
are you for sure
can you help me with more
can you help me agian
ok
is this right?
thanks
.close
Closed by @raw sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how they make this approximation to get to the bottom line?
@calm tangle Has your question been resolved?
try using taylor/geometric series expansion in s/r
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
write in parameter form an equation for the line (in the plane) determined by : 2x - y = 5.
I understand why y becomes 2t -5 but why does x become t?
I don’t know but I thought that I was supposed to solve out x and get the answer
Like why can’t I switch out y to a t and solve for x?
Oh okey but is that a valid answer to this question?
yes it is
there are multiple parametisations that are valid
x=t and y=2t-5 is one of them
X = (5-t)/2?
Okay, in my book they only gave the first answer where x=t so I was confused
Would this question be solved differently if the question said “write in parameter form an equation for the line (in the room) determined by : 2x - y = 5.”?
The book talks about lines in the room and lines in the plane
I think the room is when you have three variables
Like this next question where 2x + y - z +3 = 0
Is one answer to that question z = 2t + s + 3, x = t and y = s?
.close
Closed by @proper yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could anyone please give me an idea on how to solve the fifth question in the second part? (integrals aren't allowed in that specific question)
ᑎᗩᑕᖇᗴᝪᑌᔑᗞᗩᗯᑎ596
<@&286206848099549185>
could you translate the question
@slow belfry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okie, 1min
prove that Un+1 = ...that stuff
or you mean the translation of the whole exercice?
you have these
U_n is a decreasing serie
Where do i request help
Read #❓how-to-get-help , this channel is occupied.
Aight
and also convergent
fn+1 - fn <= 0 in [1; e]
ig that's what we have so far
@slow belfry Has your question been resolved?
@slow belfry Has your question been resolved?
@slow belfry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im not even sure what i+j = k means
i forgot lol
its i+j modulo k right? so the remainder when i+j /k?
if and only if m is prime, can I just translate that to m does not divide by 2
but that would be saying m is odd
and not all odd numbers are prime?
well that doesnt work
cause 2 is prime
m=2 also forms a field, a field with two elements (it's pretty easy to show that's a field)
The idea is that you want to show that along with other ring axioms, you can find an inverse for all the nonzero elements if m is prime
And that if m is composite, you want to somehow break a field axiom
hint that might help: ||all fields are integral domains||
@flint perch 
As in actually showing the field axioms? 
yea , this is all i have down rn
stolen from the other one
Worth of course noting down the field axioms if you have them
Hopefully it's only 8 that you need to think about
(but if you haven't shown the others elsewhere in general, we can do those?)
Some of these are basically automatic for you anyway 
sure, Im stuck on this whole thing :(( but a few examples and I'll prob start getting the gist of it
Awww
well I'm not exactly sure how much they actually want you to do
But for now, let's assume that all of those, with the exception of 8, are true, and that we have m being prime
Then of course, all the nonzero elements 1, 2, ..., (m - 1), what can we say about them and m?
if the set is A, there is are two x in A and x =/= 1 or m-1 such that x times x is m-1
x times b in A
Not necessarily (in fact you need m to be 1 mod 4, considering m prime, if I recall right)
May be worth e.g. comparing each of these separately: m is prime, so 1 and m are...?
you mean like factors of m
Yep, compare the factors of m and each of the elements 1, 2, ..., (m - 1)
wait i’ll be back in 15 min
Alright sure! Ping me when you're back 
@flint perch Has your question been resolved?
@tulip coyote
you're back 
why would you compare factors of m? because m is not in the set. also, you mean like this? for the comparision?
i’m very lost
The idea is that you want to work with the knowledge about how each of those and m relate to each other (the word I was looking for was "coprime/relatively prime") - in other words, their greatest common divisor is 1 (does that hint at something you can do from there?)
Remember that the conclusion we would like is that, say that p is in {1, 2, ..., (m-1)}, you want to be able to find an b such that p * b = 1 (remembering that means that p * b has remainder 1)
Im so screwed
i dont know what to do
the tetbook doesnt have solutions I can look to
i am so so screwed
we are just startring this course too
i dnt know what to do anymore
no its just for practice
we have an assignment due in a week ish but I dont understand anything so thats why Im going through the textbook
this is so stupid, if theres no solutions in the textbook how are you gonna learn? or if you get stuck you cant do anything
Awww
I see 
Where is the book from? How comes they don't come with solutions(?)
I guess the expectation is that you'd have either someone helping you, or if they're particularly not great, they expect you should be able to figure it out 
M. Laczkovich, V. Sos, Real analysis. Foundations and functions of one variable.
Published by Springer, 2015.
Like the one we're working on does require a bit of thought and remembering stuff
i went through two weeks of calc content in a day
linear algebras not too bad as well(I havent started but looks doable)
but this stuff
i do like 1 question a day🥲
some topics do be a bit like that 
[anyways, to help you out, Beizout's lemma might be useful to remember here
]
i dont know how gcd(a,b)=d and ax+by=d is gonna help
Well, letting, say, n be any integer between 1 and (m-1), you know that the gcd of m and n is 1, so you have an a and b such that an + bm = 1
Remember you wanted n to have a corresponding something such that when you multiply by it, you get a remainder of 1 modulo m
Does that make it any clearer? 
1 mod m is just m, assuming m != 1 so its a(n) =m...
would it be possible if you just provide a solution to this
and possibly a few others and then I can just look it over and fill in gaps where I dont understand
Well we aren’t really supposed to give solutions 
maybe I should drop out of this course, seeing my level of comprehension how would you say my chances are of passing
I think you’ll be fine, it just might take a bit of time 
@flint perch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flint perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@opal plinth Ive got my final solution
do you have a question
yea i did and Nel helped me not too long ago and i mentioned that i would let him know once i was done
you don't anymore?
well i just want to verify that ive got it right
Closed by @eager junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Number 48. I used a = 2 , b = 1, and c = -1
(also, using your example, only F works)
🗿 I am still confused
Yes
where you get negative from?
3/-1 and 2/-1 ?
oh ok
what you said about the sign flip?
swagmafia3000
oh
because whenever there is negative in inequalites you flip sign?
alright
thanks
.close
Closed by @granite bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls
It’s A
Choice A
is that a formula
When k > 0, it goes up. When k < 0, it goes down.
The horizontal shift is a bit trickier to remember. If it's (x + h), it goes left. If it's (x - h), it goes right.
Oh okay thanks bro
.close
Closed by @granite bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 22
,rccw
Can I divide the whole equation by 3
Yes
Also you didn't complete the square correctly
Oh
y^2 + 2y - 1 =/= (y-1)^2
I have to go so don't keep me waiting too long
@dense dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@rustic sequoia
@sour viper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find a , b ?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
thing is, since the denominator approaches something nonzero (3+3 = 6), evaluating this limit would have required nothing but direct substitution...
and it just becomes $\sqrt{3a + b} - 2 = -\frac{3}{2}$
Ann
so you only have one equation, but two variables.
you cannot solve for both.
oh, the value of the limit is +1/4, not -1/4.
my point still stands, bc the denom is x plus 3 ...
yes my bad
idk it’s a exam question
it's an impossible question, you're literally deprived of info.
are you 120% sure that the denominator is x+3 AND x approaches positive 3?
Yes
ok then yeah
it's unsolvable
so if your teacher is holding you at gunpoint about it im so sorry but your life will be in danger then
(but the stakes are probably a lot lower in reality)
Closed by @sudden geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are these lemmas of equality of functions equivalent? I have written below that they are not since in the first one we have to equate the images of f and g and in the second and third one we have to equate the codomains. But it need not be the case that the images and codomains are equal, is that the reason why they are not equivalent?
I have to go in a while so can someone respond?
can you rephrase the last sentence
@vivid tapir Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this one?
ok so u can establish a pattern here
u know the original price is 15000
so what do u think the price will be after one year
if it increases by 10%
@cursive wave
@cursive wave Has your question been resolved?
sorry
but it increased by 10%
so at let’s say t=0 where time is zero years have passed
it’s 15000
so after one year, t=1 what’s the new price
u can think of this is a geometric sequence
if u know what that is
no worries
do u know what a geometric sequence is
Mhm
ok do u know the formula for finding the nth term
sn = t1(r^n - 1) / (r-1)
this is the sum formula
this is saying if u added up the first n terms
t1r^n-1
15000
and what’s r
.1
no
No?
because think about it
Yeah true
Yeah
Yeah
Yeah
then it’s new price is 1.1 times the original
Got it
So it's 100% + 10%?
u would have 1-0.1=0.9
yes because if we have increase by 10% of x it’s really x+0.1x=x(1+0.1)=1.1x
this is if it decreases by 10%
ok so
Okay!
no worries
so what is it
after 10 years
don’t get tricked by the n btw
in the formula
576000?
No-
that’s too much
what’re u typing in
why 1.5?
where’d u get 1.5
Yeah
Okay
Okay, that makes sense
i thought of it like ok increase by 10% so multiply by 1.1 for the first year then again for the second
and u notice
it’s really 1.1^t
where t is what year it is
lmk what u get
38906
lol no problem
.close
Closed by @cursive wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
have u heard of completing the square
yes
yeah do it
perform it here
if i remeber correctly i think you half the b term
to get 3 over 2 x
and u get (x+3/2)-9/4 -20/4
after that point im stuck
wait
u collect like terms
-9-20 is -29
not quite!
oh
what havw i done inncorectly
i think there is a fundamental error in what you think of how completing the square works
do you want me to intuitively explain to you hoe completing the square works or do you want me to jump straight to the formula and just guide you from that
explain how it works
alright would u mind like waiting 5 minutes my phone battery is like 4% so ill get to my pc lol
no i wouldnt ,take your time
wot?
huh
do you still need help or
yes
why
i didnt understand what that sentence meant but its whatever
lets continue
so like
a perfect square trinomial is expressed as [
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2
]
the idea behind completing the square is that for SOME quadratic of the form [
ax^2 + bx + c
]
you can do some modifications (completing it) to get something with a perfect square similar to the above
so what we can do is this:
lets start with ax^2 + bx + c
okay
@tranquil pine i want you to try and factor 'a' from all 3 terms
what do u get
(x+a)^2
no
by factoring i mean like
ax + bx -> x(a+b)
oh right
the 3 terms are a b and c right
no
ax^2, bx, c
those are the three terms
x(ax+b) + c
okay great but like
im asking you to factor a not x
a(x^2+bx)
nope
that gets you ax^2 + abx if u distribute it back
is ax^2 + abx what u had to begin with
no
yes
so
you need to get rid of that a that u made appaer in the bx term
consider dividing by a for that term
a(x^2+b/a)
great!
but u missed x
in the second but im guessing that was a mistake
anyways like
a(x^2 +bx/a) + c
doing the same process for c gets you
a(x^2 + bx/a + c/a)
all clear?
yes
okay so lets ignore that a thats getting multipled
we will get to it
lets look at [
x^2 + \f{bx}a + \f ca
]
so lets compare it with what we want this to be
which is [
a^2 + 2ab + b^2 = (a+b)^2
]
its a whole different equation
[
\c g{a^2} + \c r{2ab} + \c b{b^2} \
\c g{x^2} + \c r{\f{bx}a} + \c b{\f ca}
]
i tried to colour code it for clarity sake
but do you see how a^2 = x^2 here?
they are both the same in the sense that it is some number squared
so we can also say that a = x
right
okay so i will modify it further a bitr
[
\c g{x^2} + \c r{2xb} + \c b{b^2} \
\c g{x^2} + \c r{\f{bx}a} + \c b{\f ca}
]
so we are starting to get to something that makes this work
now
were did the c term dissapear to
its still there
c/a
we factored a if you remember
oh yh
yuh
so like now
i will actually ignore the c/a part
for now
but we will come back to it
so like
[
\c g{x^2} + \c r{2xb} + \c b{b^2} \
\c g{x^2} + \c r{\f{bx}a}
]
so this is the spicy part
we want to find some term so that like
[
x^2 + \f{bx}a + {???}^2 = (x + {???})^2
]
okay so lets try and think of it slowly alright
so like
a^2 + 2ab + b^2 = (a+b)^2
thats what a perfect square is yes?
yes
we want to find the ??? that makes this exactly happen
so so
we said a = x yeah?
so we got the first term a^2 down
but for the 2ab part
how do we compare that with the bx/a term?
so like, there is a 2 missing there
[
a^2 + 2ab + b^2 = (a+b)^2 \
x^2 + \f{bx}a + {???}^2 = (x+ {???})^2
]
b^2
okay i dont think this will work very well if im going to do it this way
how about i show it to you and you can just ask questions okay?
i feel like this is too complicated for me
i will try to make it simple as much as i can
so like
thank you and if u wanna give up i wont take offence
[
\c g {a^2} + 2\c g{a}b + b^2 \
\c g{x^2} + \c g{x}\f ba + {???}^2
]
the greens are like directly together in the comparison we are making
so we want to try and find b
but like
do you notice that there is no 2 in the second one?
we can make a 2 appear by multiplying and dividing by two
so like
[
\c g {a^2} + \c r{2}\c g{a}b + b^2 \
\c g{x^2} + \c r 2\c g{x}\f b{2a} + {???}^2
]
what i did is multiply and divide by 2, which is 2/2, which is equal to 1 so it doesnt change anything
if you notice, the only thing left is the b
so we can conclude that b = b/(2a) and thus the question marks are b/2a
so in conclusion we have
[
\c g {a^2} + \c r{2}\c g{a}\c b b + \c b {b^2} \
\c g{x^2} + \c r 2\c g{x}\c b{\f b{2a}} + \p{\c b{\f b{2a}}}^2
]
i tried to illustrate it the best i could
but from this we get like
[
x^2 + 2x\f b{2a} + \f{b^2}{4a^2} = \p{x+\f b{2a}}^2
]
which is why we did all we did
ok so if u remember we had like [
ax^2 + bx + c =a\p{x^2 + 2x\f b{2a} + \f{b^2}{4a^2} + \f ca}
]
so we can come back to that
with what we did here we added the (b/2a)^2 term
we need to subtract it again to avoid breaking the equalityt
okay sigh i think i really lost you so there is no good way for me to do this with my way of thinking
how about i link you some videos about it instead yuri? @tranquil pine
sure go ahead
view all of whats being said here
alright
thank you for trying to help
,tex .cts
riemann

thats all you have to do?
yes
the reason why my thingy is
a lot more fucked up is because we are trying to consider it for any general quadratic ax^2 + bx + c
so to get this, we needed to factor a 'a' from the expression
so if you get like uh
3x^2 + 4x + 6 or something
factor 3 out so you get
3(x^2+ 4/3 x) + 6
and then complete the square on the inside
that makes alot more sense
i get it now😭
wooo
thank you for your time
bye bye
.close
Closed by @vale hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A fair die is rolled once. A is the event the score is even and B is the event the score is 5 or 6. Determine, giving reasons, whether or not events A and B are independent.
I don't really remember how to do these types of probability questions, how can I start?
basically, if two events are independent, then there couple of rules, it's pretty easy question, just brush up the rules once

awwww 
