#help-36
1 messages · Page 50 of 1
The solution the does lim (n) × lim (the other term)
So you get infinity×3 wich is infinity
Yes
Okii and when i factorise i always tell myself the sign by the the thing in front of my brackets but so is that wrong
Should i simplify
Just in case
the thing infront your brackets?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that, for every natural number n, there are n distinct natural numbers a1, a2,...,an such that a1^2+a2^2+...+an^2 is a perfect square.
I did the base case and inductive hypothesis, but I am stuck on the inductive step
Show it
Here it is
Hmm is d necessairly a perfect square
Sure you assumed you can have a perfect square from k squares
But that shouldnt necessairly mean that when you take k+1 the first k should make a perfect square
Why not?
Well for starters, you assume that there exist k squares such that they will add up to a perfect square, not for every k squares they will make a perfect square
I wont lie i dont remember the solution but id suggest trying the route of making the sum of k+1 squares a sum of two different sums whise total number of...numbers, fk English aint my native tongue, add up to k+1
Id suggest
Make your c squared
A sum of two or more squares
Which are perfect squares
And both can be achieved with less than k sqares
Which is what your hypothesis allows
Hmm no actually i think thats the wrong way
Actually nah
You can reduce the sum of k+1 squares into a sum of k or less than k squares by having some that make a perfect sqaure
Then they will make a perfect square based on your hypothesis
Wait so was my original a_1^2+...+a_k^2= c^2 right?
I wouldnt immediately write that c is a perfect square
First id say in your hypothesis that k is >=2
Then at the end id ad
Lemme look at your paper
D squared and a_k+1 squared ste distinct squares etc and we can find a perfect square for k=2
It would go Like that but i dont rly Like how its built...
They dont have to make a perfect square just cuz its a sum of squares
Right
And you should say beforehand that you selected a1 a2...ak so that they make a perfect square, not heres k of them so they make a perfect square
Cuz not all a1 ....ak will make a perfect square
But you can select them
Heres how id do it
Select a1 and a2 which make a perfect square
Which you can do because of your hypothesis
Lets call their perfect square a b
Then select a3 a4...ak + 1 so that b plus all of those ( which is k natural numbers total) make a perfect square
Itd be over then except im not sure we can state Here that for one square there are other squares so they add up to a perfect square
Just so that I can understand, we can make this step because there are less than ak squares
There should be ak squares total which is ok, the only issue is can you Pick exact number of squares for a specific square so that they all add up to a perfect square
I see
All you know is that for some number k you can take k specific distinct natural numbers and their squares will add up to a perfect square
I see, so what can we do from here?
@shy nacelle Has your question been resolved?
Well there is a hint that I received from the textbook if that helps. Use Induction. The inductive hypothesis will be a_1^2+⋯+a_k^2=b^2. Then, consider a_1^2+⋯+ak^2+b^2. This sum is not guaranteed to be a perfect square, but a related sum is. It uses one more idea: That 3^2+4^2=5^2.
Yes please
I think you can just select b squared + a_3 squared plus ...+ a_k squared such that b squared is a sum of a_1 squared plus a_2 squared and b plus a_3 plus ... a_k are a perfect square
Why?
You have a sum of k squares at most in each case
But all together are a sum of k+1 squares
But then how does this tie to the k+1 case (I have to go to pick someone up so I won't be able to repond, but I'll come back ASAP)
Cuz you have k+1 numbers in total
The trick was to just write one square as sum of 2 swuares
Thus reducing the problem into one that your hypothesis covers
@shy nacelle Has your question been resolved?
For the last part of the sentence do you you mean b squared is a sum of a_1 squared plus a_2 squared and b squared plus a_3 squared plus ... a_k sqaured are a perfect square?
@shy nacelle Has your question been resolved?
Yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do I just jump right into L'Hopital's rule from here?
\lim_{x\to5^-} \frac{\sqrt{25-x^2}}{x-5}
,align
\lim_{x\to5^-} \frac{\sqrt{25-x^2}}{x-5}
Ratatosk
I can't think of any way to get rid of the sqrt, but i mean, it stays even after l'hopital and it's undefined afterward, so idk
@forest rose Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @forest rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
heyyyyy...
im back
i need help with just the first part i thought this was math not science
i know the height, its 6
i think
but a...
freaking A
question a is so c
con
confusing
if someone wants to help ill send a piece of my hair /j
@wooden gorge For Question A you just plug in the values given for volume and base into the equation given which is v = 1/3(b)(h)
Then you solve for h
@wooden gorge just subtitue the values you have for the given variabkes
im very bad at volume so i have no idea what any of this or that means
i only know to divide the volume and the base
for the second one i think
?
for question b
yeah that one
the question tells you the equation you need to use
B
uh huh
the 1/3?
OH
volume is given as 216
so you put the numbers where the letters are
yes
ohh
are you new to variables?
not new, just terrible
im a 9th grader and my 8th grade teacher kind was bad at his job
It's ok, just understand that the letter is just a placeholder essentially
oooh
once you know what the letter is, you can put in the number value
writing this down rn
ok ok, can you show the equation you have now?
It's ok to be wrong
but you don't know the height of the shape
so that would be your unkown or x value
yes
then you isolate the x value
on one of the side
then it's just calculator work :)
sorry to ask but how do i do that
first, get rid of the fraction
and how would it be calculator work 
then
no
oh
do you know how to multiply 1/3 to = 1?
so i write dhat equation down? (Minus the numbers slashed out ofc)
yeah, then you get rid of the 36 and voila
216-36?
no, since it's multiplication
the oposite would be division
think of the pais of operators (+ and -) (x+ ÷) (^2 + sqrt)
@wooden gorge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
first image gives original function and its derivative; second image shows what i am stuck on.
i'm aware that second derivative is just taking the derivative of the first derivative, but how would i apply it to the point (1,2)? do i apply it to the point after getting the second derivative or do i apply it on the first derivative before solving for second derivative?
looking through it again i would presume applying it after as it would equal to zero if i plugged them into the first derivative
i think
now i cannot find the derivative, i get stuck when i do the quotient rule
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
@dense crescent Has your question been resolved?
mmm in the line just before the last one, why do you have dy/dx twice in the end? 🤔
(2xy)' = 2 y + 2 x y'
do i not multiply the numerator by derivative of denominator making it (6x^2 - y^2) * 2 y' ?
oh
wait
oooh
after that, it's ok to factor dy/dx
substitute what you have for dy/dx, and that should be it 🤔
could you elaborate? sorry its just not clicking in my head right now
I mean after you do that correction, it's ok to factor dy/dx as you did. Remember that you already have an expression for dy/dx, so just plug that in
wait oh my god its all coming together
@dense crescent Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @dense crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm a bit confused with how I should proceed
Have u tried plugging in (x-3) for f yet
no like
It says y = 1/x
That's ur f
f is y
x is x-3
If u just plug it in then the rest is algebra
Like adding fractions with common denominatora and shizz
OOOOHHH
So it'd be 1/x-3
Thanks
.close
Closed by @fathom stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
25a⁵×5a⁴÷a³
5⁶
no, 25 isn't equal to 5^6.
5a⁶
do you mean "I think the answer is 5a^6. Can someone tell me if I'm right?"
No, I dont know how to calculate
ok well first what can 25 be rewritten to
5²
Yes
so you have (5^2 a^5 x 5a^4)/a^3
do you think you can combine on the numerator
5a¹⁴/a³?
No
5^2 is just 5 times 5 remember
What is 5 times 5 times 5
written as 5 to an exponent
5³
Correct
so you have 5^3 times a^5 times a^4 on the numerator
Can you combine a^5 and a^4
a⁹
Yes
now you have
5^3 times a^9 over a^3
do you think you can get rid of the a^3 at the bottom to make the entire thing not a fraction
5³×a⁶
Thank you for helping me
no problem
.close
Closed by @finite blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
each day john leaves home at the same time and cycles to same route to work
on monday, his avg spd was 18km/h and he arrives 4mins late
on tuesday, his avg spd was 24km/h and he arrives 6 minutes early
time taken to travel on monday is t minutes, form an eqn in minutes for the time taken to travel to work on tuesday
well
imagine this
let's say john's work day begins at 10:00
on monday, at what time did he arrive?
and on tuesday, at what time did he arrive?
monday he would arrive at 10:06
tuesday he would arrive at 9:54
Closed by @sacred inlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need some help with this guy. I've been assured that it's possible to derive a clean condition on z such that the inequality holds (it's a line segment in the complex plane): $$\qty| 1 - \frac{ z^2 \pm z\sqrt{z^2-4} }{ 2 } | < 1$$
jan Niku
IDK if there is some kind of obvious algebra trick im missing

trivially $4 > z^2 \pm z \sqrt{ z^2 - 4} > 0$
jan Niku
i was working on this last night
but what the actual hell do you do from here
its challenging
yes, it is possible
i said ah fuck it ill just plot it
but matlab hates it
i cant get the line to show up for any mesh size i pick
so my understanding is that it's stable if the discriminant is >= 0
is that correct?
hmm? how do you get that
Well this is supposed to be a solution to $x'' + \lambda^2 x = 0$
TooManyCooks
My guess was that you don't want complex roots
because you can have exponentially increasing functions
complex is fine? are we talking about two different polynomials
Youd have to explain more which discriminant you are talking about
hrm?
So you did the substitution right? The one with linear recurrence relation?
yea
That's how you got the equation you have
i mean i can track through it or send a pic, if youd like
the quadratic
correct
No that's fine, i got it on my notes
I was thinking of what you meant by "stability" last night
Since the problem was adamant about certain values < 1
well the roots of the polynomial depend on a parameter
since the roots pop out into the z^n they clearly have to be < 1
so you require |z(b)| < 1 and solve for b
because we aren't interested in solutions that just explode to infinity
right
or does it even matter
right. so x will blow up to infinity if lambda is complex
the original recurrence is $A^n_k = z^n$
jan Niku
can you derive that condition strictly from the quadratic equation or no?
here
because that doesn't seem to follow for me
|z|< 1 came out of nowhere
well for the same number
it just doesnt seem to me like all of this additional context is helping
the problemt can be entirely divorced from everything here
yeah nvm
up to the inequality
so i dont know how much of this drudging is going to assist in moving forward unless im really really misguided

Do you want to do a poll, ask a friend or eliminate 50% of the options
i just want help lol
I'm starting to think now that this is wrong, isnt it
this doesnt make sense because b isnt real
i have to do it some other way
@mint orbit Has your question been resolved?
@mint orbit Has your question been resolved?
No
@mint orbit Has your question been resolved?
@mint orbit Has your question been resolved?
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 6
@mint orbit could you remind me of the equation from which this inequality arises
this is probably all of the context you could desire
my teacher gave me a hint but im on a mental verge so i may be misremembering
that we really want to find the boundary where |z| = 1
which is something sometning z^n = 1 or something?
so you have radius 1?
i cant remember
isn't it 1 if $\lambda \Delta t = 0$?
TooManyCooks
this wont be true
i'm just looking at the quadratic you had last night
i think it corresponds to either a string with no tension or a non-numerical scheme
yeah i think so too
from where did you get this
when I do the problem I wind up with the condition $$\left|z + \sqrt{z^2 + 1}\right| < 2$$
rat says
jan Niku
,w z^2 + (b^2-2)z + 1 = 0
and it's small
b is lambda delta t, right?
it is
oh I see
i think this is wrong, unless youre using some kind of nice substitution
yes I am using a different substitution
all i did was collect the coefficient of $z$ into a single variable
rat says
you mean the b^2-2
yes
i had hoped this would make resolving the sqrt easier
it has not
there will be some substitution trick that makes this doable, I suspect
maybe we can do this by just solving for the region or whatever my teacher was saying
aka just solving $\qty| b^2 \pm b\sqrt{b^2-4} | = 2$
jan Niku
although idk how to solve this either 
would squaring both sides not work?
sorry if I'm like just not braining here 
idk if im being really honest im not even sure what nice way exists to express the magnitude of a complex expression like that
.
yeah ok idk half of those words, think this math may be a bit out of my sphere of math knowledge sorry man 
i mean im not sure how to talk about the size of the expression absent some trick
some method might exist but idk it
take cases on whether b^2>=4 or b^2<4
Assuming b is real
b is complex
I read the rest of the convo
Oh nice
i know the answer i just cant get there
idk im having mental issues today my teacher told me a good hint but i couldnt gather it
i dont know the steps
he said somethign about how we only want the boundary
so you can solve this as an equality with one
and then its z^n = 1
which means something?
because we know its e^itheta
i have no idea what he was talking about
How z^n=1?
im not sure
Hmm
i was hoping itd make sense to someone else
x^2-z^2x+z^2=0
If the solutions to above is x, then we have |1-x|=1
And only z^2 is involved so I think we can just let z^2=a
But how do we use this
@mint orbit not that I think a numerical analysis class would cover this, but have you learned Rouche's theorem
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rouché's_theorem
i have not, ill take a look
im gonna close this because i think im going to bed for several hours
but i appreciate all the thoughts yall
.close
Closed by @mint orbit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
I was given a hint that im supposed to factorise this and conclude something from there, i arrived at f(x)=(x^2+ax/2)^2 +(3-a^2/4)x^2 +bx +1
not sure how to take it from there. what i can see is that the left term is always positive
but im not sure whether making the (3-a^2)... part >=0 will suffice
because its possible perhaps that it is negative but less in magnitude
wait
?
if all the terms are positive
and perfect squares are positive
isn't there no maximum
*bx may be negative btw
one sec
Hmm might be a little overboard but u can try calculus, if you know how to find maxima and minima
i want its derivative to have 3 real roots, and the points where f' is 0 needs to be above x axis. but doing that is harder than it sounds especially with these variables, i got that a^2>8 for f' to have 3 real roots
Could factor as x^2(quadratic) + (another quadratic) maybe, and completing the square
To f(x), there isn't, but a^2 + b^2 should have a maxima
yes that is what i had attempted and arrived at the expression i sent above
no
which would be a higher a^2+b^2 value
hop into desmos and put random values
why not
just keep them positive?
there has to be a certain set of values of a and b
for which f(x) is never negative
Sometimes certain values give complex roots too
well it looks annoying ngl but you could try completing the square on the 2nd quadratic also
please elaborate
don't get
wait am dumb
You could set f(x) = product of two monic quadratics and then solve for their coefficients, and find the roots, and then set them all > 0. But that does seem like a metric crap ton of work
@cerulean igloo ?
By which I mean (3-a^2/4)(x + b/(2(3 - a^2/4))^2 +(1 - b^2/(4(3 - a^2/4)^2))
. Then on the constant term we want 4(3 - a^2/4)^2>= b^2, then 4(9 - 6a^2/4 + a^4/16), then 36 >= 6a^2 + b^2 -a^4/4, 12>=a^2, maybe write as 0>= -a^4 + 24a^2 +(b^2 - 144) and solve for a^2 in terms of b^2

this is messy af but it's going somewhere maybe
@cerulean igloo Has your question been resolved?
a^2 = 24 +- sqrt(24^2 + 4(4b^2 - 144))/2 then can set discriminant equal to 0 i think?
Wait don't need that
Closed by @cerulean igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused on how i can find the area of bdc
Closed by @zinc bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question
The triple scalar product
u · (v x w)
Its a scalar, right? First you compute the cross product, then the dot?
Oh, derp, I guess that's right in the name. There's a typo in my teacher's notes which threw me a bit
yes
Closed by @errant sigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with an integral
$\int\frac{dx}{x^2+ax+1}$
skittle
hi
hi'
yes?
(x+1/2a)^2 +1-(a^2)/4
$(x+1/2a)^2+1-a^2/4$
skittle
thats wolfram's way isnt it
i dont quite understand
yes
so the denominator is equal to: $\left(x+\frac{1}{2a}\right)^2-\frac{a^2}{4}+1$
skittle
ok in ur integral u dont have $\frac{a^{2}}{4}$
binibini
yes
now what
?
binibini
so the denominator is equal to: $\left(x+\frac{a}{2}\right)^2-\frac{a^2}{4}+1$
skittle
yup
now what
binibini
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
wait
skittle
what is t???
1 s
this is a substitution method
but what did you substitute
so you will replace thex with some "t".
i dont really understand
$(x+\frac{a}{2})=t* \sqrt{\frac{-a^{2}}{4} +1}$
binibini
where
u have it in denominator of ur integral, and we want in denominator $x^{2}+1$
binibini
1 s
?
can you just expain what do i do after that step?
nope
binibini
$t^{2} +4$
binibini
WHAT THE HELL IS T
some example
to solve
what x will you substitute to get $x^{2} +1$
binibini
in what expresssion
u have intergral of $\frac{dt}{t^{2} +4}$
binibini
this is just an example
can you solve such an integral?
i think so
show ur work if u solve
this is your new unknown that you substitute for x
yup , good
u see , u took 4 before t, in ur task u can too
$(\frac{-a^{2}}{4} +1)$
binibini
u can take it before x
like u did here
factor it out?
yup
how?
it=P (for easier writing )
this is what i get
yup
out it , before ur intergral
binibini
i rewrote it
how do u know
look, here u had $\frac{t^{2}}{4}$
binibini
t/2 is ur "u" here
binibini
this is the question
and this is the factored denomionator
@sour sentinel Has your question been resolved?
@sour sentinel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there's a way way way easier way to approach this
do you know the formula for u x v involving sin(theta) and the formula for <u,v> involving cos(theta)?
yes
i recommend using those here
hmm, okay. Is there a reason im failing at this method?
I assume I simply cant add then subtract the equation in blue to try and solve
oh hell nah
@hasty cipher Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello could someone please help me graph this?
im unsure
would i graph y=-7 as a point?
and then x<1 as a line from 1 to infinity?
<@&286206848099549185>
@tidal granite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
plz <@&286206848099549185>
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
isnt it just the graph of y=-7 on the domain of x<1
yes
graph it
ive tried
i dont know how to graph this
how do i graph smth like that in general
idk how to graph (x,-7)
ah its a set rooster
or x<1
set rooster bro
whats that
set rooster method in set theory
ive never heard of that
how do i do that
well for such element of x tending to y you have to include its functions and its graphical representation including its limits, asymptotes, domain, range, and y - intercepts
what should i start with
i have no info on this how am i supposed to graph with only this information
just put x = -7
and color the area behind x = 1
how do i make an equation out of this
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @tidal granite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is the hint from the book
@wary parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wary parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So question
Would this be the proper way to write out my equation? My biggest concern is 4yt as to whether or not that is the correct way to input it
@livid meteor Has your question been resolved?
I think you should write y instead of y(t) as your question specifies.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone know what the line in the middle means??
@forest topaz do you mean |
yea
no, other way around. a|b means a is a factor of b
thanks
Do you know
What that symbol with three dots mean?
Like the inverse three dots
Also universal statements can be disproved by counterexample right?
But that cannot be proved by example
i said in context,
not a tiny image that contains only the symbol itself and nothing else...
right now it looks like a slightly fucked up letter y
=
can i have the entire page, please
uncrop
i THINK it might be $\because$, meaning ``because''
Ann
exactly
Yeah that symbol
And that turned upside down 180 degrees is therefore right?
yes
i have to say im not really happy with how it took 2 tries before you could properly show me what you were asking about
Sorry my first answer was definitely vague, I only had a very low quality screenshot of my professor's lecture notes so its my bad
well you could've sent the entire thing still
At the time I though that the image might be good enough but I apologize if it wasn't clear
@forest topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please explain this solution? Especially the underlined part
it says that, you can use 2005x1 instead of 2005x2005 cause every hxw rectangle in the 2005x2005 can be put in 2005x1 as 1xw
yup
The question now is about how many rectangles which contain the middle square over the total amount of rectangles
right
i don't understand why 2005 + 2C2005
oh wait i got it
it is 2005*2005/2
...
i mean
2005 squares + 2005*2004/2
so 2005*2006/2
for rectangles 1 - 1002, the amount of rectangles which include middle square is 1003
so for 1004 - 2005 too
wait a second. why can these be the same in 2005 ways, and different in 2c2005 ways?
what do yo mean by 2005 ways?
look at the underlined sentence in the solution
you mean when transitioning from 2005x2005 to 2005x1?
no
so for 1003 there are 2005 rectangles
oh
cause for 1x1 there are 2005 ways to put in a line
and for othere there are 2C2005
right
okay
so 1003*2004 + 2005
or, as it says 1003^2
so 1003^2/(2C2006)
1003 squares to choose from the left side, 1003 squares to choose from the right side? (that forms a beginning and an end
right
yup, thank you so much:))
no problem
.close
Closed by @wary parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Rational Equation
I'm confused on where should I start multiplying
multiply both side by 2x(x-2)
you have to get $3x*2x - 4x(x-2) = 5(2x)(x-2)$
TimK
no
Use this
i have to multiply 5x twice right?
right
both
so i could just use any of them?
right
my answer is 6x - 4x - 8x = 10x^2 - 20x
but i still have to find the value of x
im still confused cuz this is how my teacher taught us
ok, what is $3x*2x - 4x(x-2) = 5(2x)(x-2)$ simplified?
TimK
TimK
simplify: $28x = 8x^2$
TimK
then $x(8x-28) = 0$
TimK
@spark nova
honestly i dont know what to do cuz i cant keep up with the lesson so i have no idea if it should be simplified or not, all i know is that we have to find the value of x
look at the steps i sent
how did it became 4x^2 + 8x? why did the sign change?
-(-) = +
oh right
how did it came to this?
-28x from both sides
where did the -28x come from?
it is to cancel out 28x
ohh okay i get it now
@spark nova Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spark nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
very dumb question but why is the domain of 1/|x|-x (-∞,0)
Closed by @green quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let ABCD be a parallelogram and M a point inside it, if angle MBA is congruent to angle MDA, demonstrate that angle MAB is congruent to angle MCB.
@undone owl Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @undone owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
With what @undone owl
with the problem
Let ABCD be a parallelogram and M a point inside it, if angle MBA is congruent to angle MDA, demonstrate that angle MAB is congruent to angle MCB.
What?
YouTube is there or chat gpt
Iam a highschool student
I tried both
Oh
9th?
<@&268886789983436800>
what the
<@&268886789983436800>
Yeas
why are you pinging the mods
ok
so?
?
What's going on here?
How did you know
bro just decided to call mods to help
I guessd smh?
with this punchline
Pak?
It doesn't look like any moderator action is needed here. The OP was a bit trigger happy with the helper ping, but we usually don't punish that.
trigger happy? what does it mean?
You're only supposed to ping helpers once.
ok thx ill remember in the future
As for your question, the first step is to draw a diagram. Do you have one?
yes
You should show it then; that will make it easier for helpers to see if they have any ideas.
(I've drawn my own diagram now, and I don't immediately get any ideas, sorry. Interesting property if it holds.)
(You'll probably want to move M a bit out of the way so it doesn't look like it lies on AC. But, as I said, I don't really have any ideas).
Thank you anyway
Well, I suppose you can't just move M willy-nilly. Perhaps if you make the side lengths of ABCD more different, you can get M to fall more clearly off the diagonal.
Idea: If you select a coordinate system where the slopes of AB and AD are minus each other, then "angle MBA = angle MDA" simply means that the slopes of MB and MD are also minus each other, and "angle MAB = angle MCB" means that the slopes of MA and MC are minus each other.
and "angle MAB = angle MCB" means that the slopes of MA and MC are minus each other.
No, that is nonsense -- it doesn't hold :-(
Yes it does!
(Tropo doddering around and arguing with himself).
Since we're now talking about slopes rather than angles, the assumptions and conclusion all stay the same if we scale the y-direction independently of the x-direction. So without loss of generality we can assume that the slopes of AB and AD are ±1, in other words that ABCD is a rectangle!
@undone owl Has your question been resolved?
And we know we can assume ABCD is a rectangle, we can pick a much nicer coordinate system for it: one where the coordinates are A(0,0), B(0,h), C(w,h), D(w,0).
In this setting "angle MBA = angle MDA" becomes x/(h-y) = y/(w-x) and we need to prove that is the same condition as x/y = (h-y)/(w-x). But that is clearly the case.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help to prove Q2b with induction
Closed by @sleek epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I was doing an exercise and I found myself stuck at the second step of the exercise:
Ex:
U0=0 and for any natural number n, Un+1=1/2-Un
-
calculate U1, U2, U3,U4
I found U1=0.5, U2=1/1.5, U3=0.75, U4=0.8 -
Deduce a conjecture of the explicit form of Un as a function of n.
I've tried several things here, but nothing seems good to me.
Could you help me and explain to me how to do it please?
1/2 2/3 3/4 4/5
?
don't forget to .close if there are no more questions
Closed by @spare light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @subtle lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

