#help-33

1 messages · Page 225 of 1

rapid spire
#

Did u get 2 equations?

thin bobcat
#

Yea

rapid spire
#

Now subtract one from the other using elimination

thin bobcat
#

Do you mean collect the like terms ?

rapid spire
#

Wait

thin bobcat
#

8a + b - a - b ?

rapid spire
#

U got number 1 and number 2 right?

#

So now subtract 1 from 2

#

That would give u 7a

thin bobcat
#

I got one question why are we subtracting it ?

rapid spire
#

So that we can find a and b

#

Show me your equations

thin bobcat
#

Ok got it

rapid spire
#

It should be 7a=42

#

7a left hand side

thin bobcat
#

Ok

rapid spire
#

You can find b now by substituting the value of a in the 1st equation

thin bobcat
#

Ok bro makes sense, we sub for a (6)and sub the x for 1?

#

Either equation will work right ?

rapid spire
thin bobcat
#

So I can replace the x either 1 or 2 ?

rapid spire
#

yh u would get the same answer

thin bobcat
#

6 for a ?

rapid spire
#

i meant for a

thin bobcat
#

Ok

#

Thank you

rapid spire
#

you're welcome

thin bobcat
#

👍

elfin stone
#

@thin bobcat Do you have anymore questions?

thin bobcat
#

Yes

calm harbor
#

.solved

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @calm harbor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm harbor
#

.reopen

marsh citrusBOT
#

thin bobcat
#

I don’t get it

#

What does this general rule mean ?

calm harbor
thin bobcat
#

Yes

calm harbor
#

What is the context of it?

thin bobcat
#

To find the remainder without doing the long division?

calm harbor
#

yes

#

So for any polynomial f(x) divided by (x-k), f(k) will be its remainder, right?

thin bobcat
#

Right

calm harbor
#

Right, so how do we determine whether (x-a) or (x+a) are the factors of $x^n - a^n$ or $x^n + a^n$

elfin berryBOT
#

🌙 ЅκψΑиdΝιɡħτ

calm harbor
#

This is the first question

#

@thin bobcat

thin bobcat
#

Through the remainder Therom?

calm harbor
#

Yes, what should you do specifically?

calm harbor
thin bobcat
#

I don’t get it

calm harbor
#

What does remainder theorem says?

#

Pretend that I'm a friend of yours and I've never heard of this term before, how would you explain this technique to me?

thin bobcat
#

Oh ok, you must get one of your factor (x+a), x=-a then multiply with the coefficient and add/subtract

calm harbor
thin bobcat
#

We can find the other factors and the remainder

calm harbor
#

We can find the other factors and **the remainder **

#

Fantastic, now we have the common ground

thin bobcat
#

Ok

calm harbor
#

So basically you plug a value in and check if it has a result, if no then the divisor is the factor of the polynomial

thin bobcat
#

So my sender would be we would use the remainder therom the factors and remainder

calm harbor
#

For example Let's take $x^n - a^n$ and $x-a$ for example. When x = a is plugged into the polynomial, it is obvious that the result would be zero, meaning that the latter is the factor of the former

elfin berryBOT
#

🌙 ЅκψΑиdΝιɡħτ

calm harbor
#

Do you agree with that?

#

Remainder = 0 >> factor

thin bobcat
#

I understand it, it’s the very first step before doing the remainder therom

#

You must find the 0

calm harbor
#

Alright, so can you tell me in what condition will (x+a) be the factor of x^n - a^n?

#

x+a, mb

thin bobcat
#

=0

calm harbor
#

no, I'm asking about the condition of n

thin bobcat
#

The n must be positive integer

calm harbor
#

odd or even?

thin bobcat
#

Odd

calm harbor
#

yes

#

why?

thin bobcat
#

When you subsitute x = -a in to your equation , you can get the result of 0 needed for the factored theorem ?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@thin bobcat Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quick oyster
#

Can someone please give me a starting point
Someone told me to consider triangle EOB but idk how to (O is the center of the circle)

quick oyster
#

Sorry it hasn’t been 15 mins but I have to go soon

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Where are you helpers

wispy stump
quick oyster
#

Yes I know that part

wispy stump
#

E has to be uniquely determined

quick oyster
#

But I need to use PoP

wispy stump
wispy stump
quick oyster
#

Nothing

#

But idk how

wispy stump
#

You know that point b lies outside w

quick oyster
#

Yes I know that

calm harbor
#

I drew a cute diagram for that if anyone needs it

wispy stump
quick oyster
#

YES I HAVE THE VASICS

#

I HAVE A DIAGRAM

vital oracle
#

there’s a meme for this

calm harbor
wispy stump
quick oyster
#

I gotta go sleep

#

If you guys have hints please Dm

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @quick oyster

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

night relic
marsh citrusBOT
night relic
#

oops

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @night relic

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

solemn minnow
marsh citrusBOT
solemn minnow
#

can anyone help me?

calm harbor
solemn minnow
#

2018K = 2018 (mod 10000)

#

1009K = 1009 (mod 5000)

#

and then?

#

what should i do

solemn minnow
indigo nest
#

You wouldn't divide the base of the mod

solemn minnow
#

but

indigo nest
solemn minnow
#

GCD (10000,2) = 2

#

am i wrong?

indigo nest
#

Wait I'm stupid

solemn minnow
#

wwww

indigo nest
#

,calc 2018 * 5001

elfin berryBOT
#

Result:

1.0092018e+7
indigo nest
#

Yeah I'm stupid I forgot how modular division works

solemn minnow
#

its okayy

indigo nest
#

Anyway I don't think you can do any better

#

You want the number so you want k = 1 mod 5000 such that 2018k is less than 10^9

solemn minnow
#

yes

bleak meadow
#

i don't think your initial system of congruences is correct, or at least you're missing one congruence

bleak meadow
#

consider that you also want the answer to be a multiple of 2018

solemn minnow
#

oh yea

#

you have solution?

bleak meadow
#

i think i have, but of course it would be better for you to work it out

#

(i'm not sure i'm right anyway)

solemn minnow
#

just show me your solution

bleak meadow
#

!noans

marsh citrusBOT
#

The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.

solemn minnow
#

lemme check

#

damnn

#

tell me the steps

bleak meadow
#

after forming your two congruences, you should probably find out how often the solutions repeat (by finding the distance between each repeat).
then, find out the smallest such solution, and figure out how many repeats you can fit within your size constraint

#

as for how often the solutions repeat, you're gonna have to do a little finicking with your congruences and perhaps use a property common to both mods (maybe the smallest of them...?)

solemn minnow
#

so i have to do that over and over again until i find the smallest solution?

bleak meadow
#

the smallest solution should be obvious

solemn minnow
#

what modulo should i use

bleak meadow
#

now that's the fun part

bleak meadow
#

if you mean the new mod, yes

#

it's definitely between those two numbers

#

but you'll need to use the two original mods to find the new mod

solemn minnow
#

damnn

bleak meadow
#

I will say this: one of the original mods you should use is 10000, not 5000

solemn minnow
#

and then 100000?

bleak meadow
#

nope

#

the other mod is a 4-digit number

#

it's also given in the question statement and is the other mod I mentioned that you did not consider

solemn minnow
#

Is there a pattern in the congruence results?

bleak meadow
#

well, yes I suppose?

#

your new mod is exactly the distance between each solution

solemn minnow
#

waitt

#

so first, 2018K=2018 (mod 10000) am i right?

bleak meadow
#

I would rather say $N \equiv 2018 \pmod{10000}$

elfin berryBOT
#

Céline

bleak meadow
#

and ofc i screw my LaTeX up lol

solemn minnow
#

wwww

bleak meadow
#

also, I have been informed there are more solutions than at first I thought

#

so let me recheck

solemn minnow
#

okii

#

how if N<10⁹/2018

bleak meadow
#

ok nvm I stick to my guns

solemn minnow
#

hmm

bleak meadow
#

we'll deal with that size constraint later

#

first, identify the second congruence

bleak meadow
solemn minnow
#

first N=12018 right?

bleak meadow
solemn minnow
#

second congruence, i should multiply by2?

#

idk how to find second congruence

bleak meadow
#

look at the question again

solemn minnow
#

N=2018+10000K (mod10000)

bleak meadow
#

what is the other condition that a number should have?

solemn minnow
bleak meadow
#

you have only dealt with the last four digits

#

you have not dealt with one other condition

solemn minnow
#

first condition is 4-last digit 2018

#

N=2018K+2018(mod10000)?

bleak meadow
#

no

#

the mod itself should be different

solemn minnow
#

hmmm

#

10001?

bleak meadow
#

the mod is a 4-digit number

solemn minnow
#

3000

#

?

bleak meadow
#

how do you write the congruence for the multiple of a number?

bleak meadow
#

first, do you know what a congruence is?

solemn minnow
#

a=b+kn

#

a= b (mod n)

bleak meadow
#

in other words, a number x is congruent to another number y, mod some N, if x divided by N leaves the same remainder as y divided by N

#

agreed?

solemn minnow
#

yeah agree

#

so, we use CRT?

bleak meadow
#

not yet

#

we need the other congruence, then we can CRT our way to victory

#

but first

#

what does being a multiple of another number mean?

#

if I take a number A that is a multiple of some other number B, what is the remainder of A/B?

solemn minnow
#

0?

bleak meadow
#

so in other words, $A \equiv 0 \pmod B$

elfin berryBOT
#

Céline

solemn minnow
#

okayy

bleak meadow
solemn minnow
#

yea i see

bleak meadow
#

so what's the second congruence?

solemn minnow
#

is it a multiple of 2018

bleak meadow
solemn minnow
#

2018N= 0 (mod 2018)

#

?

bleak meadow
#

funny you should do that, because 2018 is ofc going to be 0 mod 2018, so you could have skipped writing it

solemn minnow
#

2018N+K = K (mod 2018)

bleak meadow
#

well, I said to skip writing something, and you added to it

#

the second congruence is $N \equiv 0 \pmod{2018}$

elfin berryBOT
#

Céline

bleak meadow
#

that's it

solemn minnow
#

what should I do actually, is look for another modulo that has four digits?

bleak meadow
#

does 2018 not have four digits?

solemn minnow
#

yes

bleak meadow
#

exactly.

solemn minnow
bleak meadow
#

this is our second condition

#

now, we need to know our common modulus

#

and here you can bring out your CRT. find the common mod of 2018 and 10000

#

(the new mod is 8 digits long.)

solemn minnow
#

ohhh okay

#

so from N=2018(mod 10000) and N=0 (mod 2018) we use CRT right?

bleak meadow
#

you can use the CRT directly on the mods themselves.

solemn minnow
#

it is mod10090000?

bleak meadow
#

yes

solemn minnow
#

whats next?

bleak meadow
#

now, what's the smallest solution to the problem?

solemn minnow
#

so N=2018(mod10090000)?

bleak meadow
#

yes, sure

#

but we're interested in the smallest solution

solemn minnow
#

5000?

#

ehh

bleak meadow
#

5000 neither ends in 2018 nor is a multiple of 2018

solemn minnow
#

just 100090000-2018?

bleak meadow
#

no

#

what's the smallest multiple of 2018?

solemn minnow
#

ohhh

bleak meadow
#

🤔

#

,w 7018 mod 2018

elfin berryBOT
bleak meadow
#

(super direct hint: you're already looking at the smallest solution. in fact, you have seen it said multiple times throughout this conversation)

bleak meadow
#

finally!

#

2018 is a multiple of 2018, exactly (1 times 2018), and for obvious reasons it ends in 2018

#

so it fits the bill as our smallest solution ✅

solemn minnow
#

i forgot if 2018=2018(mod10090000)

bleak meadow
#

a number is always its own multiple, ma'am

solemn minnow
solemn minnow
bleak meadow
#

anyway

#

we now know our smallest solution

#

and we know the distance between solutions

solemn minnow
#

yes

bleak meadow
#

so we can express solutions in the form 2018 + 10090000k

#

and now, we will finally bring in our size constraint

solemn minnow
#

because N=2018(mod10090000) right?

bleak meadow
#

we know that we want whatever solution to be less than 10^9

solemn minnow
#

yea

bleak meadow
#

and we know that we have a solution for every integer value of k

#

so now, we need to find the applicable range of values of k

#

set up an inequality to solve for k

solemn minnow
#

so K=9?

#

max of K

bleak meadow
#

too small

#

there are way more solutions than that

solemn minnow
#

ehh wait

#

2018+10090000K<10⁹?

bleak meadow
#

mhm

#

solve for k

solemn minnow
#

99?

#

10⁹-2018

#

and then divided by 10090000

bleak meadow
#

could have just put those two parts in the same sentence

#

but yes

solemn minnow
#

tysm @bleak meadow

bleak meadow
#

wait

solemn minnow
bleak meadow
#

so what's your final answer?

solemn minnow
#

my first solution was very far

#

hehe

bleak meadow
#

I meant your final answer

solemn minnow
#

ohh

bleak meadow
solemn minnow
#

99

bleak meadow
#

wrong

#

did you remember that 2018 is also a solution (corresponding to k = 0)?

solemn minnow
#

damnn

#

i forget

#

so all solution is 100?

bleak meadow
#

correct

#

curious, what grade is this question?

solemn minnow
#

idk

bleak meadow
#

what grade are you then, if I may ask?

solemn minnow
#

i think math olympiad

#

in my country

solemn minnow
bleak meadow
#

I see.

#

okay, so is there anything else you would like to ask?

solemn minnow
#

Is this a common question or do you think it needs further study?

bleak meadow
#

wdym?

solemn minnow
#

Do you think this is a normal problem or do you think it hard problem?

bleak meadow
#

can't it be both?

#

so basically you want to know how hard I think the problem is

solemn minnow
#

yes

#

hehe

bleak meadow
#

if you understand the constraints, and the CRT, then you can kill this in 10-15 minutes if you're meticulous and used my method

#

while guiding you through I was notified of another solution that could kill this faster, but it jumped quite a few hoops

#

the original problem you had with the question was that you formed the wrong congruences

#

(or straight up missed one)

#

so I would say, it's hard until you know exactly how to translate the words into math and apply the math you know

#

I mean, you seem to know the math well enough

#

except for the whole "number is a multiple of itself" thing, which is worth remembering

solemn minnow
#

ohh okay

bleak meadow
#

so overall, I would say, if you said this was an olympiad question, I would say this would be on the easier side

#

if this was homework though, then this was indeed quite a good mental workout

solemn minnow
#

umm okayy

#

i have last question, when should we look for another modulo?

bleak meadow
#

wdym

solemn minnow
#

like from this question

#

first i use mod10000

#

and then we should find the smallest modulo?

bleak meadow
#

no

#

we translated the constraints to a system of congruences

#

we aren't deliberately looking for another modulo (well, other than the CRT -> new mod part)

#

it all depends on the question

solemn minnow
#

i see now

#

So we need a lot of practice so that we know which modulo to use in certain questions?

bleak meadow
#

that, and know what multiples/divisors mean

solemn minnow
#

ahh okayy

#

tysm @bleak meadow

#

sorry if i look stupid solving this problem

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @solemn minnow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dreamy hedge
#

Hi, can anyone check my work on this exercise pls.

marsh citrusBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

dreamy hedge
#

.end

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dreamy hedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

full oyster
#

Dont know where to start limits and derivatives

bleak meadow
#

do you have a question you're stuck with?

full oyster
#

i cant solve a basic equation which has limit

#

but to be particular heres the ques

full oyster
rancid geode
#

ds gives 0/0

#

consider factoring

full oyster
#

wait

#

lemme factor

#

im getting x^2/x-3

rancid geode
#

good

#

so whats the answer

full oyster
#

-4 ?

rancid geode
#

cool

full oyster
#

damn

#

thats it ?

#

what

rancid geode
#

ye

#

,w lim as x-> 2 of (x^3 - 2x^2)/(x^2 - 5x + 6)

full oyster
#

it was easy

elfin berryBOT
rancid geode
#

boom

full oyster
#

wow

#

idk why does it look so hard

#

thanks a ton

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @full oyster

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bronze sparrow
marsh citrusBOT
bronze sparrow
#

can someone help me check if my answer is correct

indigo nest
#

Sure

blazing dew
#

Send it here

bronze sparrow
#

it mention that i shouldn't use quadratic formula

bleak meadow
#

think you slipped up here

bronze sparrow
#

what the issue?

wanton sphinx
#

plus minus should be on the square root

#

not the 1

bronze sparrow
#

is there a difference?

bleak meadow
#

yes

#

big difference

bronze sparrow
#

damn

#

when i write i was like " whatever, it should be the same"

bleak meadow
#

you have no justification to \pm the 1 here

glossy flint
bronze sparrow
#

now think about it

#

yeah it is not multiplication

#

it is difference

#

so the answer is x=2.32 or x=-0.32?

bleak meadow
#

first answer wrong sign

bronze sparrow
#

isnt it 1+1.32?

bleak meadow
#

actually both answers wrong sign i believe

bleak meadow
indigo nest
#

,calc sqrt(1.75)

elfin berryBOT
#

Result:

1.3228756555323
bronze sparrow
#

ohhhhhhhhh

bleak meadow
#

when you shove that 1 over to the right it had better not be still positive

bronze sparrow
#

wait

#

x+1 no?

bleak meadow
#

uhuh

bronze sparrow
#

ohhhhhhhhh

#

yeah i got it

#

0.32 and -2.32 right?

#

thanks

#

btw

#

i got a question

bronze sparrow
#

can i do the squareroot first then divide by 4?

bleak meadow
#

no

bronze sparrow
#

or i must do the division first

bleak meadow
#

if you do the square root first, you'll also have to sqrt the 4

bronze sparrow
#

ohhhhh

bleak meadow
#

a quick reminder that you cannot selectively apply operations to some terms and not to others

glossy flint
#

You can do the square root and then you can divide by 2 (not 4)

#

But I don't recommend it, because you'll need the absolute value on x+1

bronze sparrow
#

yeah

#

thank guy

#

i think i got it

#

but i think you will see me again very soon

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bronze sparrow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

bronze sparrow
#

.reopen

marsh citrusBOT
#

bronze sparrow
#

i forgot to ask something

#

when should i apply the plus and minus?

#

is it that there is negative?

bleak meadow
#

when taking the square root of both sides

bronze sparrow
#

when putting square root?

bleak meadow
#

this step right here

bronze sparrow
#

so when i square root another side

bleak meadow
#

specifically

bronze sparrow
#

i have to put minus and plus?

#

ohhhh

bleak meadow
#

technically you rooted both sides

bronze sparrow
#

yeah true

#

thank

#

.

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bronze sparrow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bronze sparrow
marsh citrusBOT
bronze sparrow
#

feel wrong

indigo nest
#

,w 3x^2 + 5x - 7 = 0

#

Oof

tawdry rampart
#

Blud the boxes are there so you write inside them 🥀

indigo nest
#

Boxes are a suggestion

bronze sparrow
#

question not even that deep

indigo nest
bronze sparrow
#

ohhhhhhhhhhh

indigo nest
bronze sparrow
#

forgot to multiply

indigo nest
#

Yes

indigo nest
bronze sparrow
#

how about now?

#

lmao

#

wait

#

forgot to square root

#

thank guy

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bronze sparrow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bronze sparrow
marsh citrusBOT
bronze sparrow
#

should be last question

raw hawk
#

,w 2x²-3x+2=0

elfin berryBOT
bronze sparrow
#

what is the i for?

raw hawk
#

Where did the - sign go

#

Anyways I think you should try it again

bronze sparrow
#

isnt it here

raw hawk
#

Try using the quadratic formula then complete the square

#

And see if you get the same thing

bronze sparrow
raw hawk
bronze sparrow
raw hawk
#

And I don't think it's a good idea to convert the fractions to decimals

#

Except in your answer

bronze sparrow
#

ohhh

#

ok

#

let me just redo it

raw hawk
#

i=√-1 btw

bronze sparrow
#

how do you square root fraction btw?

#

i still got the same answer

raw hawk
elfin berryBOT
bronze sparrow
#

ohhh

#

Still doesn't feel right

amber birch
#

in this step the -3/2 x suddenly disappeared

#

and you replaced it with -3/4

bronze sparrow
#

because -3/2 should be divide by 2 when got square

#

which is -3/4

amber birch
#

you need to add back (3/4)^2, so as to not change what you started with

marsh citrusBOT
#

@bronze sparrow Has your question been resolved?

bronze sparrow
#

I'm confused

#

Do you have a worked example?

amber birch
# bronze sparrow Do you have a worked example?

This algebra video tutorial explains how to solve quadratic equations by completing the square. It contains plenty of examples and practice problems.

Quadratic Equations - Free Formula Sheet: https://www.video-tutor.net/algebra-formula-sheet.html

Quadratic Equations - More Video Content:
https://www.video-tutor.net/quadratic-equations.htm...

▶ Play video
marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tall pond
#

I think the answer is D right?

marsh citrusBOT
tall pond
#

S2 has to be necessary and sufficient for S1 surely

#

because if it had any other factor then suddenly it's not sufficient for S1

#

like 1/15 or 1/14

#

yes they have factors of 2 and 5 but they have another factor

#

so I think I can exclude B, C, E from being solutions for sure

#

and then for S3 and S1 i just test the contrapositive

#

wait is S2 not the opposite of S3?

#

so then the statements are basically S1, S2, Not S2

devout mauve
#

there is a slight problem with numbers like 2/1

tall pond
#

and we know if not S2 then not S1 is true because s2 is necessary for s1

spark otter
devout mauve
#

imo S2 is not well formulated

tall pond
spark otter
#

imo S3 is also not well formulated, unless voluntary

#

e.g is 10 a power of 2 or a power of 5?

devout mauve
#

fair

tall pond
devout mauve
#

q=10 has a factor 10 which is not a power of 2 or 5

spark otter
tall pond
devout mauve
#

1/10

#

q=10

tall pond
#

10 = 5*2

#

?

devout mauve
#

but 10 itself is not a power of 2 or 5

#

and it is a factor of q

spark otter
#

and so, S3 is correct

tall pond
#

i think thats what the question means

devout mauve
#

but thats not what S3 says

spark otter
#

but S2 is correct too

devout mauve
#

all around, throw the question away

#

you cant do logic with imprecise statements

tall pond
#

the question is problematic then

#

i should probably change the question to say it has no factors that aren't a power of 2 or 5 other than itself?

devout mauve
#

is this your own question?

glass quiver
#

just say prime factors

spark otter
#

let's say, to fix the question, that S2 : "The only possible prime factors of q are 2 and 5"

#

and we don't change S3

tall pond
#

yeah i tried to make a question

spark otter
#

then S1 ≡ S2 and -S3 => S2

devout mauve
#

no S1 and S2 are not equiv

#

2/1

devout mauve
#

ok thats how you meant it

#

vacuous truths my beloved

ashen fog
#

PayPal

spark otter
#

S2 isn't equivalent to "the only possible prime factors...", in your statement you're implying q has exactly those as factors

tall pond
#

2 or 5

#

mb

spark otter
#

and so 3/2 for example doesn't verify S2 as 5 isn't a factor

spark otter
#

"the only prime factors of q are 2 or 5"

tall pond
spark otter
#

and again, 2/1 doesn't verify S2 because it has neither

devout mauve
#

why not just rewrite it properly and say "if z is a prime factor of q, then z is 2 or 5"

#

aka \forall z dividing q, z prime, z in {2,5}

#

and S3 is \exists z dividing q, z prime, z not in {2,5}

spark otter
#

(and in that case A is correct)

devout mauve
#

(the benefit with writing it like this is that you can easily negate statements like this by just swapping all quantifiers etc)

#

no

#

S3 is fucked up

tall pond
#

pls tell me it isnt fucked this time

devout mauve
#

yes

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tall pond Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

main fulcrum
marsh citrusBOT
main fulcrum
#

is this clear

#

its x-->infinity

fickle vessel
elfin berryBOT
#

@fickle vessel

main fulcrum
#

i dont understand what to do with infinity

umbral oasis
#

Divide the numerator and denominator by x

fickle vessel
umbral oasis
#

Point is that the -10 and 20 in the numerator and denominator don't matter

umbral oasis
#

So you can think of it as 6x/(-x)

main fulcrum
umbral oasis
main fulcrum
#

why does -10 and 20 not matter

umbral oasis
balmy shadow
fickle vessel
#

Think about it this way

umbral oasis
#

Another way to see it would be that 6x and -x grow very large in absolute value compared to -10,20 as x->infty

wispy stump
main fulcrum
#

so its so small that it wont even make a difference?

fickle vessel
#

If I tell you, your glass of water has 6.022 * 10^60 molecules of water, but when we actually count them, it comes out to be 6.022 * 10^60 + 10, would you care about those extra 10?

main fulcrum
#

nah

fickle vessel
#

Exactly

main fulcrum
#

i see

fickle vessel
#

As numbers approach infinity

#

the smaller numbers lose significance

main fulcrum
#

so we just divide the coefficients ?

fickle vessel
#

in case of addition and subtraction at least

#

Yes

#

Well

main fulcrum
#

so just -6

fickle vessel
#

Yup

main fulcrum
#

ahh

#

I see

#

Thanks to everyone for helping

fickle vessel
#

You're welcome

main fulcrum
#

.close

fickle vessel
#

!done

marsh citrusBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

#
Channel closed

Closed by @main fulcrum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

full oyster
#

when i end up with 0/0 while dealing with limits how do i know what to do next so i dont end w zero

stoic saddle
#

it really really really depends.

fervent rampart
#

that's generally a sign that you need to do some algebra to get something on the numerator and denominator of the fraction to cancel. what sort of algebra is very context dependent

stoic saddle
#

the general idea is to factorize numerator & denominator, locate the factors which are causing the zero, and cancel them out or otherwise get rid of them somehow

#

(by legal means, which doesnt mean just poofing them out of existence!)

#

show what limit(s) you're dealing with.

full oyster
#

sometimes im able to see through the equation and i just factorise them (if they can be factorised) but manier times im left clueless about what to do next

stoic saddle
#

show some of the limits that left you clueless

full oyster
stoic saddle
#

this looks factorizable to me.

full oyster
#

what the indian guy did was made the 81 into 9^2 and made the x^4 in whole square

stoic saddle
#

if you confirmed you got 0/0 then you know for free that (x-3) is a factor of num and denom.

#

x^4 - 81 can be factorized by applying the difference of squares identity twice

#

you know the difference of squares identity, yes?

full oyster
#

yes

#

so like

#

every equation can be factorised ?

#

there has to be some

#

that cannot be factorised

fickle vessel
stoic saddle
#

these are not "equations"

fickle vessel
full oyster
stoic saddle
#

anyway, when it comes to specifically rational functions, factorization can p much always help you.

#

you may encounter shit that got roots in it.

full oyster
#

yes

stoic saddle
#

or shit with trig functions in it.

full oyster
#

roots

#

yes trigs

#

what to do during that time

stoic saddle
#

a common trick for dealing with rooty shit is multiplication by the conjugate.

full oyster
#

specially the roots

full oyster
#

just multiply with conjugate of denom

stoic saddle
#

multiply with conjugate of the problematic part

#

wherever it might be

#

maybe you could show an example problem with rooty shit that i could explain in detail

full oyster
#

wait

#

i guess i forgot the timestamp where he solved the root one

#

ill notify u when such type of rooty ques occur next time

stoic saddle
#

do you have anything else to ask right now

full oyster
#

nope im done

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @full oyster

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lavish pelican
#

how to do this integration

marsh citrusBOT
lavish pelican
#

i took sqrt cos theta common

#

and got it to
(1+t^2)/(sqrt t+1)^8 from 0 to infinity

noble geyser
#

huh what did you do??

lavish pelican
#

tan theta = t

noble geyser
#

mhm

lavish pelican
#

then thats what i got...

main idol
#

did you try u = sqrt(t)

lavish pelican
#

ok that will give 2(u+u^5)/(u+1)^8 from 0 to infinity

#

after that what to do

main idol
#

think of another substitution

novel juniper
lavish pelican
# lavish pelican

btw this is the original question, the msg im replying to is what i got it down to

elfin berryBOT
lavish pelican
main idol
#

yes don't go in circles

lavish pelican
lavish pelican
main idol
#

no

noble geyser
#

prob because im dumb

main idol
#

you have a polynomial on top and another polynomial at the bottom

noble geyser
#

yea that integration by parts no?

main idol
#

you can do a simple sub to get just powers of u

#

then you just use power rule to integrate

lavish pelican
main idol
#

yea try it

lavish pelican
#

bet bet

#

2[(t-1)+(t-1)^5)]t^8 from 1 to infinity

#

the t-1^5 still looks kinda tough

noble geyser
#

shouldnt it be t-1

lavish pelican
#

oh ye sorry

noble geyser
#

shouldnt this be integration by parts now

#

?

#

oh wait no you can just solve it

lavish pelican
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lavish pelican

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

elfin badger
marsh citrusBOT
elfin badger
#

does anyone know how to round these numbers to 1d.p

#

and keep the table?

jagged relic
#

Like an Excel command?

fringe nacelle
fringe nacelle
#

then .close , glad you figurd it out

elfin badger
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @elfin badger

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vernal mica
#

@knotty trellis the other channel closed?

main idol
vernal mica
#

this was my progress and i was correcting my errors

knotty trellis
#

Do u also have the corrected version or are u working on that?

vernal mica
#

im nearly done

#

i forgot to add .[C] near the end i fixed it tho

knotty trellis
#

Now its pretty solid, id just add "Note that projc(a) + projc(b) = projc(a+b)" somewhere and the arrow u drew shpuld really be pointing from projcb, not the |c|

#

In general, dont be afraid to use words in proofs

#

Proofs dont have to be only equations, in fact, there is usually more text than equations

#

But anyway, your proof is pretty solid and i think ur prof should understand it

vernal mica
#

okay i added the note thanks

knotty trellis
#

Np, enjoy ur prom

vernal mica
#

can you check the first problem for me as well. part 1 of the problem gave me a bit of hassle but part 2 was simple enough but itd be good for you to check so i dont make any mistakes

knotty trellis
#

Ill prolly head to sleep now, but if u just post it, someone else will definitely check it soon

vernal mica
#

its quick dw way easier than the second part

vernal mica
#

Problem 1. Consider a particle in one dimension, whose position as function
of time t is given by
x(t) = α t cos(ωt).

  1. Give the dimensions of the constants α and ω.
  2. Give the velocity v(t) and the acceleration a(t).
#

can anyone check if its right

marsh citrusBOT
#

@vernal mica Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@vernal mica Has your question been resolved?

cunning fiber
#

,w differentiate a t cos(bt) with respect to t

elfin berryBOT
cunning fiber
#

,w second derivative of a t cos(bt) with respect to t

elfin berryBOT
cunning fiber
vernal mica
#

thank you

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

loud temple
marsh citrusBOT
loud temple
#

Is this correct?

queen sun
#

No

#

Do you know about the rule for a triangle with points on a circle with one side being the diameter?

loud temple
#

I think

queen sun
#

Let D be the centre of the circle

#

All the edges coming out of D are the same length, so all the points A, B, C can be on a circle

marsh citrusBOT
#

@loud temple Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @loud temple

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ancient thunder
marsh citrusBOT
ancient thunder
#

like i understand a bit but other than that i dont understand most of it like i feel slow

static quarry
#

can you paste a screenshot of whatever it is?

ancient thunder
#

its like a whole topic but its about the Sampling distribution of the sampling mean

#

and like Central limit theorem, Z-value etv

#

etc

static quarry
#

well can you single out a specific question you have?

#

help channels aren't really for teaching an entire lecture of material

ancient thunder
#

YEAH i know but its like

#

i literally cannot grasp it no matter how much videos i watch

#

id like to atleast have someone explain to me like the general idea

#

and not the entire lecture material if that makes sense

static quarry
#

like maybe tell us the first thing from the lecture or video that you're not sure about

ancient thunder
#

all of itttt...

marsh citrusBOT
#

@ancient thunder Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@ancient thunder Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stable quail
#

trying to decipher my teacher's solutions for implicit differentiation- im confused with how he goes from line 3 to line 4? specifically how he went from (1+y') to y' (1/2 (x+y)^-1/2).....

stable quail
#

like its kinda late so maybe i missed smth but huh???

fringe nacelle
stable quail
#

oh wait. yeah the first term in line 4 is just the 1 from 1+y' ?

fringe nacelle
#

yup

stable quail
#

ok yes

#

htan kyoyu!!!!!!!

fringe nacelle
#

np

stable quail
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @stable quail

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pliant coral
#

to find the linear speed of the bicycle I just need to find the linear speed of the back wheel right? and just ignore the front one

pliant coral
#

what I've done so far was use this formula

#

and got

#

nevermind

#

I did it wrong

#

how do I find displacement when its given in this weird form? because typically you just multiply by 2pi but it doesn't work in this case I believe

night relic
#

right now, you have the RPM of the pedals, and you want the RPM of the back wheel (the front wheel will have the same angular velocity, or RPM)

#

what can you use to find the RPM of the wheel?

pliant coral
#

mmm

night relic
pliant coral
#

I'm trying to think

#

we have the RPM of the pedals

#

but I just don't see how we can use what we have to get the RPM of the wheels

night relic
#

well, what facts do we have relating the pedals and wheel?

pliant coral
#

we have the diameter

#

which gives us the radius

#

and the radius of the rear sprocket

#

and the RPM of the Cyclist

night relic
#

theres an additional piece of information: "Thus every time the cyclist makes one full revolution with the pedals," then how many revolutions does the wheel make?

pliant coral
#

4?

#

wait that doesn't sound right

#

somthing to do with this

#

I just can't figure out what

night relic
#

yeah exactly

#

what this sentence is saying is: 1 revolution of the pedals = 2 revolutions of the wheel

pliant coral
#

but 4/2 is 2

#

so isn't it saying 2 = 2 revolutions?

night relic
#

it's saying 1 pedal rev = 2 wheel revs

pliant coral
#

oh

#

okay

night relic
#

it also gives you the 4 and the 2 with the chain, so you can do it yourself

#

but then they also gave you the ratio, which is nice :)

#

anyways, what we have now is $$180 \frac{\text{pedal rotations}}{\text{min}}.$$ We want to multiply this by something to get $\frac{\text{wheel rotations}}{\text{min}}$

elfin berryBOT
#

χασιβ ♥

pliant coral
#

2

night relic
#

then we can get the radians/minute, and use the radius to get linear displacement, like the example u showed

pliant coral
#

so

#

180*2

#

=

#

360

night relic
#

exactly!

#

so 360 rotations/min is how many radians/min

pliant coral
#

uhhh

#

I don't know what the conversion factor is

#

if there is one

#

oh wait

#

its 180pi right!?

night relic
#

assuming that's from your notes or something?

pliant coral
#

thats from our textbook

#

*free online textbook

#

okay

#

so it wouldnt be 180pi

#

it would be

#

360*2pi

#

which is

#

720pi

#

and then we take that

#

and multiply it by 9

#

and get 6480pi as our final awnser

night relic
pliant coral
#

: D

#

yay

#

it was correct

#

and then to get ti miles/hour

#

is pretty simple

#

just multiply numorator by 12

#

and then 5280

#

and denominator by 60

#

and get

#

which simplifies to

#

6842880pi

#

and it was wrong : ((

#

wait I did that wrong and my textbook litteraly explains it : /

night relic
#

you had the right idea, just flipped

pliant coral
#

it said thats wrong too

#

: C

night relic
#

you are currently at $\frac{6; 480\pi}{63; 360} \frac{\text{miles}}{\text{minute}}$

elfin berryBOT
#

χασιβ ♥

night relic
#

also, they want it to two decimal places, so probably an approximate answer

pliant coral
#

oh

#

so

#

I need to divided the denominator by 60

pliant coral
night relic
#

interesting

night relic
night relic
# pliant coral

i would recommend writing all of these steps out, tedious as it may be, just to make sure nothing gets missed :)

pliant coral
#

mk

#

I've kinda done that on paper

pliant coral
#

this is my last try on this problem

night relic
#

hmm im not getting the same thing

pliant coral
#

hmm

#

oh

#

I think I divded by 6

#

instead of 60

#

by accident

night relic
#

that would explain it lol, i was off by a factor of 10

pliant coral
#

so it should actually be this

night relic
#

looks good to me catthumbsup🤞

pliant coral
#

OMG

#

FINNALLY

#

2 hours of my life

#

have been spent on this problem

#

thank you so much for helping me!

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pliant coral

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

prime scroll
#

.claim

#

?claim

marsh citrusBOT
proud ice
#

Just say anything that doesn't start with a period

prime scroll
#

claim

proud ice
#

It's already yours to use

prime scroll
#

oh ok

#

it never say my name

proud ice
#

discord won't put periods in channel names

prime scroll
#

ok

prime scroll
proud ice
#

!da2a

marsh citrusBOT
#

No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/

proud ice
#

But no, I cannot. Someone else will though. I must head out

prime scroll
#

Does anyone know about algebra?

proud ice
#

again, no need to ask if anyone knows. Just ask your question

novel juniper
prime scroll
#

uh

#

like

#

this is myf irst question

#

its simple for u i think

#

but not for me

novel juniper
#

ah, can you make the denominator the same on the left

prime scroll
#

i dont know how to solve it

calm harbor
prime scroll
#

at all

novel juniper
#

The thing is I have a class now, so I can't help, sorry