#help-33
1 messages · Page 225 of 1
Yea
Now subtract one from the other using elimination
Do you mean collect the like terms ?
Wait
8a + b - a - b ?
U got number 1 and number 2 right?
So now subtract 1 from 2
That would give u 7a
I got one question why are we subtracting it ?
Ok
You can find b now by substituting the value of a in the 1st equation
Ok bro makes sense, we sub for a (6)and sub the x for 1?
Either equation will work right ?
yh
6 for a
So I can replace the x either 1 or 2 ?
yh u would get the same answer
6 for a ?
i meant for a
you're welcome
👍
@thin bobcat Do you have anymore questions?
Yes
.solved
Closed by @calm harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
How do you do 11
I don’t get it
What does this general rule mean ?
Do you still remember remainder theorem?
Yes
What is the context of it?
To find the remainder without doing the long division?
Right
Right, so how do we determine whether (x-a) or (x+a) are the factors of $x^n - a^n$ or $x^n + a^n$
🌙 ЅκψΑиdΝιɡħτ
Through the remainder Therom?
Yes, what should you do specifically?
I don’t get it
What does remainder theorem says?
Pretend that I'm a friend of yours and I've never heard of this term before, how would you explain this technique to me?
Oh ok, you must get one of your factor (x+a), x=-a then multiply with the coefficient and add/subtract
okay, but what does the result represent after we do all these work?
We can find the other factors and the remainder
We can find the other factors and **the remainder **
Fantastic, now we have the common ground
Ok
So basically you plug a value in and check if it has a result, if no then the divisor is the factor of the polynomial
So my sender would be we would use the remainder therom the factors and remainder
For example Let's take $x^n - a^n$ and $x-a$ for example. When x = a is plugged into the polynomial, it is obvious that the result would be zero, meaning that the latter is the factor of the former
Oh ok
🌙 ЅκψΑиdΝιɡħτ
I understand it, it’s the very first step before doing the remainder therom
You must find the 0
Alright, so can you tell me in what condition will (x+a) be the factor of x^n - a^n?
x+a, mb
=0
no, I'm asking about the condition of n
The n must be positive integer
odd or even?
Odd
When you subsitute x = -a in to your equation , you can get the result of 0 needed for the factored theorem ?
@thin bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please give me a starting point
Someone told me to consider triangle EOB but idk how to (O is the center of the circle)
Sorry it hasn’t been 15 mins but I have to go soon
<@&286206848099549185>
Where are you helpers
Start with symmetry observations
Yes I know that part
E has to be uniquely determined
But I need to use PoP
Whats the current status
Yep
You know that point b lies outside w
Yes I know that
I drew a cute diagram for that if anyone needs it
@quick oyster
there’s a meme for this
what's PoP?
Power of a point
Closed by @quick oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
its a very cute diagram :D
Closed by @night relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me?

K= 1 (mod 5000)
but
You didn't do it here
Wait I'm stupid
wwww
,calc 2018 * 5001
Result:
1.0092018e+7
Yeah I'm stupid I forgot how modular division works
its okayy
Anyway I don't think you can do any better
You want the number so you want k = 1 mod 5000 such that 2018k is less than 10^9
yes
i don't think your initial system of congruences is correct, or at least you're missing one congruence
hmmm
unless you baked it into this one, which I don't think it is
consider that you also want the answer to be a multiple of 2018
i think i have, but of course it would be better for you to work it out
(i'm not sure i'm right anyway)
just show me your solution
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
after forming your two congruences, you should probably find out how often the solutions repeat (by finding the distance between each repeat).
then, find out the smallest such solution, and figure out how many repeats you can fit within your size constraint
as for how often the solutions repeat, you're gonna have to do a little finicking with your congruences and perhaps use a property common to both mods (maybe the smallest of them...?)
so i have to do that over and over again until i find the smallest solution?
the smallest solution should be obvious
what modulo should i use
now that's the fun part
^
between 2018 and 10⁹?
if you mean the new mod, yes
it's definitely between those two numbers
but you'll need to use the two original mods to find the new mod
damnn
I will say this: one of the original mods you should use is 10000, not 5000
and then 100000?
nope
the other mod is a 4-digit number
it's also given in the question statement and is the other mod I mentioned that you did not consider
Is there a pattern in the congruence results?
I would rather say $N \equiv 2018 \pmod{10000}$
Céline
and ofc i screw my LaTeX up lol
wwww
also, I have been informed there are more solutions than at first I thought
so let me recheck
ok nvm I stick to my guns
hmm
this is the first
first N=12018 right?
nonono, this is already the first congruence
look at the question again
N=2018+10000K (mod10000)
what is the other condition that a number should have?
you have only dealt with the last four digits
you have not dealt with one other condition
how do you write the congruence for the multiple of a number?
and no, not the other congruence here
first, do you know what a congruence is?
in other words, a number x is congruent to another number y, mod some N, if x divided by N leaves the same remainder as y divided by N
agreed?
not yet
we need the other congruence, then we can CRT our way to victory
but first
what does being a multiple of another number mean?
if I take a number A that is a multiple of some other number B, what is the remainder of A/B?
0?
so in other words, $A \equiv 0 \pmod B$
Céline
okayy
see where I'm getting at now?
yea i see
so what's the second congruence?
is it a multiple of 2018
yeah, but how would you write it as a congruence like this?
funny you should do that, because 2018 is ofc going to be 0 mod 2018, so you could have skipped writing it
2018N+K = K (mod 2018)
well, I said to skip writing something, and you added to it
the second congruence is $N \equiv 0 \pmod{2018}$
Céline
that's it
what should I do actually, is look for another modulo that has four digits?
does 2018 not have four digits?
yes
exactly.
from this we can conclude N multiple by 2018
this is our second condition
now, we need to know our common modulus
and here you can bring out your CRT. find the common mod of 2018 and 10000
(the new mod is 8 digits long.)
you can use the CRT directly on the mods themselves.
it is mod10090000?
yes
whats next?
now, what's the smallest solution to the problem?
so N=2018(mod10090000)?
5000 neither ends in 2018 nor is a multiple of 2018
just 100090000-2018?
ohhh
(super direct hint: you're already looking at the smallest solution. in fact, you have seen it said multiple times throughout this conversation)
umm
2018?
finally!
2018 is a multiple of 2018, exactly (1 times 2018), and for obvious reasons it ends in 2018
so it fits the bill as our smallest solution ✅
i forgot if 2018=2018(mod10090000)
a number is always its own multiple, ma'am
i see
yeah youre right
anyway
we now know our smallest solution
and we know the distance between solutions
yes
so we can express solutions in the form 2018 + 10090000k
and now, we will finally bring in our size constraint
because N=2018(mod10090000) right?
we know that we want whatever solution to be less than 10^9
and we know that we have a solution for every integer value of k
so now, we need to find the applicable range of values of k
set up an inequality to solve for k
tysm @bleak meadow
wait
lmaoo im sorry
so what's your final answer?
I meant your final answer
ohh
^
99
idk
what grade are you then, if I may ask?
im grade 11
Is this a common question or do you think it needs further study?
wdym?
i mean
Do you think this is a normal problem or do you think it hard problem?
if you understand the constraints, and the CRT, then you can kill this in 10-15 minutes if you're meticulous and used my method
while guiding you through I was notified of another solution that could kill this faster, but it jumped quite a few hoops
the original problem you had with the question was that you formed the wrong congruences
(or straight up missed one)
so I would say, it's hard until you know exactly how to translate the words into math and apply the math you know
I mean, you seem to know the math well enough
except for the whole "number is a multiple of itself" thing, which is worth remembering
ohh okay
so overall, I would say, if you said this was an olympiad question, I would say this would be on the easier side
if this was homework though, then this was indeed quite a good mental workout
wdym
like from this question
first i use mod10000
and then we should find the smallest modulo?
no
we translated the constraints to a system of congruences
we aren't deliberately looking for another modulo (well, other than the CRT -> new mod part)
it all depends on the question
i see now
So we need a lot of practice so that we know which modulo to use in certain questions?
that, and know what multiples/divisors mean
ahh okayy
tysm @bleak meadow
sorry if i look stupid solving this problem
.close
Closed by @solemn minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, can anyone check my work on this exercise pls.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Closed by @dreamy hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Correct
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Dont know where to start limits and derivatives
do you have a question you're stuck with?
ya i did till there
wait
lemme factor
im getting x^2/x-3
-4 ?
cool
it was easy
boom
Closed by @full oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me check if my answer is correct
Sure
Send it here
think you slipped up here
what the issue?
is there a difference?
you have no justification to \pm the 1 here
How can it be the same??
now think about it
yeah it is not multiplication
it is difference
so the answer is x=2.32 or x=-0.32?
first answer wrong sign
isnt it 1+1.32?
actually both answers wrong sign i believe
x+1 = 1.32
,calc sqrt(1.75)
Result:
1.3228756555323
ohhhhhhhhh
when you shove that 1 over to the right it had better not be still positive
uhuh
ohhhhhhhhh
yeah i got it
0.32 and -2.32 right?
thanks
btw
i got a question
no
or i must do the division first
if you do the square root first, you'll also have to sqrt the 4
ohhhhh
a quick reminder that you cannot selectively apply operations to some terms and not to others
You can do the square root and then you can divide by 2 (not 4)
But I don't recommend it, because you'll need the absolute value on x+1
yeah
thank guy
i think i got it
but i think you will see me again very soon
.close
Closed by @bronze sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
i forgot to ask something
when should i apply the plus and minus?
is it that there is negative?
when taking the square root of both sides
wdym
when putting square root?
this step right here
so when i square root another side
specifically
both sides
technically you rooted both sides
Closed by @bronze sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Blud the boxes are there so you write inside them 🥀
Boxes are a suggestion
You didn’t multiply properly
forgot to multiply
Yes
Was just me checking dw
Closed by @bronze sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,w 2x²-3x+2=0
Try using the quadratic formula then complete the square
And see if you get the same thing
it said that i shouldn't be using quadratic formula
You can use it to check though?
true
And I don't think it's a good idea to convert the fractions to decimals
Except in your answer
i=√-1 btw
,, \sqrt{\frac{x}{y}}= \frac{\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{y}}
David
in this step the -3/2 x suddenly disappeared
and you replaced it with -3/4
yes, so because you subtracted (3/4)^2
you need to add back (3/4)^2, so as to not change what you started with
@bronze sparrow Has your question been resolved?
This algebra video tutorial explains how to solve quadratic equations by completing the square. It contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
Quadratic Equations - Free Formula Sheet: https://www.video-tutor.net/algebra-formula-sheet.html
Quadratic Equations - More Video Content:
https://www.video-tutor.net/quadratic-equations.htm...
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think the answer is D right?
S2 has to be necessary and sufficient for S1 surely
because if it had any other factor then suddenly it's not sufficient for S1
like 1/15 or 1/14
yes they have factors of 2 and 5 but they have another factor
so I think I can exclude B, C, E from being solutions for sure
and then for S3 and S1 i just test the contrapositive
wait is S2 not the opposite of S3?
so then the statements are basically S1, S2, Not S2
there is a slight problem with numbers like 2/1
and we know if not S2 then not S1 is true because s2 is necessary for s1
no...
imo S2 is not well formulated
oh
imo S3 is also not well formulated, unless voluntary
e.g is 10 a power of 2 or a power of 5?
fair
10 = 10/1 = 10/2^0 = 10/5^0?
q=10 has a factor 10 which is not a power of 2 or 5
i'm talking about S3, so it's the denominator
thats not the denominator
and so, S3 is correct
it has a power of 2 and power of 5 as factors though
i think thats what the question means
but thats not what S3 says
but S2 is correct too
oh wait
the question is problematic then
i should probably change the question to say it has no factors that aren't a power of 2 or 5 other than itself?
is this your own question?
just say prime factors
let's say, to fix the question, that S2 : "The only possible prime factors of q are 2 and 5"
and we don't change S3
if im being honest
yeah i tried to make a question
then S1 ≡ S2 and -S3 => S2
here
S2 isn't equivalent to "the only possible prime factors...", in your statement you're implying q has exactly those as factors
and so 3/2 for example doesn't verify S2 as 5 isn't a factor
?
and again, 2/1 doesn't verify S2 because it has neither
why not just rewrite it properly and say "if z is a prime factor of q, then z is 2 or 5"
aka \forall z dividing q, z prime, z in {2,5}
and S3 is \exists z dividing q, z prime, z not in {2,5}
(and in that case A is correct)
(the benefit with writing it like this is that you can easily negate statements like this by just swapping all quantifiers etc)
no
S3 is fucked up
yes
@tall pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$$\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{6x - 10}{20 - x}$$
@fickle vessel
i dont understand what to do with infinity
Divide the numerator and denominator by x
Have you done any work so far?, any attempt at simplifying the fraction or anything?
Point is that the -10 and 20 in the numerator and denominator don't matter
no
So you can think of it as 6x/(-x)
whats the logic behind it
.
why does -10 and 20 not matter
.
Because the numbers are vanishingly small
As x goes to infinity 6x >>> 10, and 6x - 10 becomes approximately equal to 6x
Think about it this way
Another way to see it would be that 6x and -x grow very large in absolute value compared to -10,20 as x->infty
@main fulcrum 1/infinity = ?
so its so small that it wont even make a difference?
If I tell you, your glass of water has 6.022 * 10^60 molecules of water, but when we actually count them, it comes out to be 6.022 * 10^60 + 10, would you care about those extra 10?
nah
Exactly
i see
so we just divide the coefficients ?
so just -6
Yup
You're welcome
.close
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @main fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when i end up with 0/0 while dealing with limits how do i know what to do next so i dont end w zero
it really really really depends.
that's generally a sign that you need to do some algebra to get something on the numerator and denominator of the fraction to cancel. what sort of algebra is very context dependent
the general idea is to factorize numerator & denominator, locate the factors which are causing the zero, and cancel them out or otherwise get rid of them somehow
(by legal means, which doesnt mean just poofing them out of existence!)
show what limit(s) you're dealing with.
sometimes im able to see through the equation and i just factorise them (if they can be factorised) but manier times im left clueless about what to do next
show some of the limits that left you clueless
this looks factorizable to me.
what the indian guy did was made the 81 into 9^2 and made the x^4 in whole square
if you confirmed you got 0/0 then you know for free that (x-3) is a factor of num and denom.
x^4 - 81 can be factorized by applying the difference of squares identity twice
you know the difference of squares identity, yes?
yes
so like
every equation can be factorised ?
there has to be some
that cannot be factorised
Not every, but this one can be
these are not "equations"
Also true
what shall i do when they cannot be
anyway, when it comes to specifically rational functions, factorization can p much always help you.
you may encounter shit that got roots in it.
yes
or shit with trig functions in it.
a common trick for dealing with rooty shit is multiplication by the conjugate.
specially the roots
thats it ?
just multiply with conjugate of denom
multiply with conjugate of the problematic part
wherever it might be
maybe you could show an example problem with rooty shit that i could explain in detail
wait
i guess i forgot the timestamp where he solved the root one
ill notify u when such type of rooty ques occur next time
do you have anything else to ask right now
Closed by @full oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do this integration
i took sqrt cos theta common
and got it to
(1+t^2)/(sqrt t+1)^8 from 0 to infinity
huh what did you do??
tan theta = t
mhm
then thats what i got...
did you try u = sqrt(t)
think of another substitution
Try factoring out $\sqrt{\sin(\theta)}$
btw this is the original question, the msg im replying to is what i got it down to
wai
i cant think of anything..u=tan^2 theta? but i feel like thats going in circles
i mean from here
yes don't go in circles
isnt that the same as factoring out cos theta
do i put u as 1/u?
no
i still dont understand how you got that
prob because im dumb
you have a polynomial on top and another polynomial at the bottom
yea that integration by parts no?
you can do a simple sub to get just powers of u
then you just use power rule to integrate
u+1 = t?
yea try it
bet bet
2[(t-1)+(t-1)^5)]t^8 from 1 to infinity
the t-1^5 still looks kinda tough
shouldnt it be t-1
oh ye sorry
yeah nvm i got it from here we can just split and for the second integral u-->1/u
.close
Closed by @lavish pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Like an Excel command?
do you actually want th enumbers rounded or just have the display rounded
i figured it out
then .close , glad you figurd it out
.close
Closed by @elfin badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@knotty trellis the other channel closed?
channels timeout. can you just repost your question and progress here
Do u also have the corrected version or are u working on that?
Now its pretty solid, id just add "Note that projc(a) + projc(b) = projc(a+b)" somewhere and the arrow u drew shpuld really be pointing from projcb, not the |c|
In general, dont be afraid to use words in proofs
Proofs dont have to be only equations, in fact, there is usually more text than equations
But anyway, your proof is pretty solid and i think ur prof should understand it
okay i added the note thanks
Np, enjoy ur prom
can you check the first problem for me as well. part 1 of the problem gave me a bit of hassle but part 2 was simple enough but itd be good for you to check so i dont make any mistakes
Ill prolly head to sleep now, but if u just post it, someone else will definitely check it soon
thank you i will
Problem 1. Consider a particle in one dimension, whose position as function
of time t is given by
x(t) = α t cos(ωt).
- Give the dimensions of the constants α and ω.
- Give the velocity v(t) and the acceleration a(t).
can anyone check if its right
@vernal mica Has your question been resolved?
@vernal mica Has your question been resolved?
,w differentiate a t cos(bt) with respect to t
,w second derivative of a t cos(bt) with respect to t
thank you
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
No
Do you know about the rule for a triangle with points on a circle with one side being the diameter?
I think
Yh
Let D be the centre of the circle
All the edges coming out of D are the same length, so all the points A, B, C can be on a circle
@loud temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @loud temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so like i dont understand this at all
like i understand a bit but other than that i dont understand most of it like i feel slow
can you paste a screenshot of whatever it is?
its like a whole topic but its about the Sampling distribution of the sampling mean
and like Central limit theorem, Z-value etv
etc
well can you single out a specific question you have?
help channels aren't really for teaching an entire lecture of material
YEAH i know but its like
i literally cannot grasp it no matter how much videos i watch
id like to atleast have someone explain to me like the general idea
and not the entire lecture material if that makes sense
like maybe tell us the first thing from the lecture or video that you're not sure about
all of itttt...
@ancient thunder Has your question been resolved?
@ancient thunder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
trying to decipher my teacher's solutions for implicit differentiation- im confused with how he goes from line 3 to line 4? specifically how he went from (1+y') to y' (1/2 (x+y)^-1/2).....
like its kinda late so maybe i missed smth but huh???
he distributed it over the left factor
oh wait. yeah the first term in line 4 is just the 1 from 1+y' ?
yup
.close
Closed by @stable quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
to find the linear speed of the bicycle I just need to find the linear speed of the back wheel right? and just ignore the front one
what I've done so far was use this formula
and got
nevermind
I did it wrong
how do I find displacement when its given in this weird form? because typically you just multiply by 2pi but it doesn't work in this case I believe
right now, you have the RPM of the pedals, and you want the RPM of the back wheel (the front wheel will have the same angular velocity, or RPM)
what can you use to find the RPM of the wheel?
mmm
~ microwaves
I'm trying to think
we have the RPM of the pedals
but I just don't see how we can use what we have to get the RPM of the wheels
well, what facts do we have relating the pedals and wheel?
we have the diameter
which gives us the radius
and the radius of the rear sprocket
and the RPM of the Cyclist
theres an additional piece of information: "Thus every time the cyclist makes one full revolution with the pedals," then how many revolutions does the wheel make?
4?
wait that doesn't sound right
somthing to do with this
I just can't figure out what
yeah exactly
what this sentence is saying is: 1 revolution of the pedals = 2 revolutions of the wheel
it also gives you the 4 and the 2 with the chain, so you can do it yourself
but then they also gave you the ratio, which is nice :)
anyways, what we have now is $$180 \frac{\text{pedal rotations}}{\text{min}}.$$ We want to multiply this by something to get $\frac{\text{wheel rotations}}{\text{min}}$
χασιβ ♥
2
then we can get the radians/minute, and use the radius to get linear displacement, like the example u showed
uhhh
I don't know what the conversion factor is
if there is one
oh wait
its 180pi right!?
i was just going off of this lol
assuming that's from your notes or something?
thats from our textbook
*free online textbook
okay
so it wouldnt be 180pi
it would be
360*2pi
which is
720pi
and then we take that
and multiply it by 9
and get 6480pi as our final awnser
this is what i got too :D
: D
yay
it was correct
and then to get ti miles/hour
is pretty simple
just multiply numorator by 12
and then 5280
and denominator by 60
and get
which simplifies to
6842880pi
and it was wrong : ((
wait I did that wrong and my textbook litteraly explains it : /
you had the right idea, just flipped
you are currently at $\frac{6; 480\pi}{63; 360} \frac{\text{miles}}{\text{minute}}$
χασιβ ♥
also, they want it to two decimal places, so probably an approximate answer
they didn't care about that on the first problem
interesting
yep, aka multiply the whole thing by 60
i would recommend writing all of these steps out, tedious as it may be, just to make sure nothing gets missed :)
hmm im not getting the same thing
that would explain it lol, i was off by a factor of 10
so it should actually be this
looks good to me
🤞
OMG
FINNALLY
2 hours of my life
have been spent on this problem
thank you so much for helping me!
.close
Closed by @pliant coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just say anything that doesn't start with a period
claim
It's already yours to use
discord won't put periods in channel names
ok
can help me with alegbra
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
But no, I cannot. Someone else will though. I must head out
Does anyone know about algebra?
again, no need to ask if anyone knows. Just ask your question
what kind of algebra
ah, can you make the denominator the same on the left
i dont know how to solve it
at all
The thing is I have a class now, so I can't help, sorry


