#help-33
1 messages · Page 206 of 1
we know that t must be between 0 and 8 for car 1 to even fit there
but what about car 2?
For what values of t will there be space for it?
8?
Yes, for t = 8 there definitely is space for it
yea
but what are all the possible values of t?
13
there are whole intervals of them
T cant be 13
t must be between 0 and 8
can you open this graph?
yea
okay, so now try finding the interval(s) of all possible t, such that there is still a place for car2 to be parked
wdym by wiggle room?
well the first car can park within the first 3 meters, or within the last 3 meters, and the second car can still fit in
8/13?
Why 3?
because it leaves 5 meters on the other side
oh i see what you mean
the answer is not 8/13 though
no its 6/8
the first car right?
yep
if its between 0 and 3, the 2nd car can be parked on the right side
if its between 5 and 8, we can park another car on the left side
Closed by @slender comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You have the numbers 2, 3, 6, 42 and 27. You can only use one +, one -, one × and one ÷ and you have to use all the numbers, so that the math expression totals to 0
it works with
(42 ÷ 6) - (27 ÷ 3) + 2 = 0 but it uses two ÷
and no ×
is this possible?
<@&286206848099549185> is this possible?
and no multiplication
that works as well
i got one using all numbers and all operators once
so it is possible
do you maybe remember the answer?
bet
as I said, can you get 0 with a subset?
so only using some of those numbers?
yeah
no i think i have to use all of them
that will work towards a solution
0 multiplied by the last number gives 0
if you can find 0 by using only some of the numbers and no multiplication
you can multiply the rest of the numbers by that 0
to get 0
did you find a solution using that rbit?
let's say the numbers are 2, 5, 7, 102, 306, then you can just do (7-(2+5))*(306/102)
i found a solution using that method as well
it could be anything really in place of 102 and 306
so like (y)*(0) but i need to get something to 0 and a y without multiplying
why not 732502 and 83991013
yes
the y is the least interesting because it can be any combination of numbers and operators
as long as you can find 0 without multiplication
yeah theres more it seems
you can swap the 2 and 3 to get another
42÷6 was suggested too
and you can find one without this trick by doing 42 / 6
to get 7
and then using 7, 2, 27, 3, +, -, x to get 0 as well
you got the solution i found :D
or i you can just divide 0 by anything to get 0
(6-3*2)÷(42+27)
could also work
.close
Closed by @nova rivet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am supposed to do this by completing the square.
This is the one I came up with
Any way to improve it?
Should I have come up with another square or should I try to find the lowest value with this one?
I see there are (y+1) and (y-1) involved but I don't see a way to do something with this knowledge
Oh, thanks for your silence. I found the answer myself. It is even more precious.
.close
Closed by @static geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Den stokastiska variabeln $\xi \in N(0,1)$ Bestäm talet a så att a) $P(\xi > a) = 0.001$, b) $P(\xi > a) = 0.999$, c) $P(|\xi| < a) = 0.95$, d) $P(\xi > a) = 0.05$. Can someone help me understand how to solve these?
Totalani
@slender comet Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @slender comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Saw a youtube short of 70%÷14%. And the comments were having a debate if the answer was 5% or 500%. What’s the answer?
you can see the % sign as a fraction, 1/100
so (70/100)/(14/100) is 5
or 500/100 or 500%
Yeah, that’s what I thought. Most comments said the answer is 5%. So I was confused
.close
Closed by @heavy onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help integrating
tan^8(x)sec^2(x)
try a subsituion
hint: Write tan in terms of sec
i think theres a much simpler way that that
I’m still a bit confused, where would I substitute here?
consider the following: the derivative of tan is sec^2x
u = tan x
(1/9) but yes
weird order of elements, but if you mean tan^9x/ 9 then yes
Closed by @modern tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello , is there anyway to solve it without dx/dy ?
iam stuck on this step
1-cos+cos^2/x^4
Without dy/dx you mean without l'hôpital?
yeah
Since x -> 0, you can use the small angle approximation for cos (i.e. take the first 2 non-zero terms of its Taylor expansion, and drop the rest)
it's not cos(x)(1-cos(x))
it's cos(1-cos(x))
Do you mean $$\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{1-\cos x(1-\cos x)}{x^4}$$
or $$\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{1-\cos(1-\cos x)}{x^4}$$
SWR
then '1 - cos + cos^2' is wrong
This is what I thought at first, but his working is making me think that perhaps he just omits the variables for cosine (which is very egregious and error prone if true)
yikes
oh
anyways, you can use that 1-cos(t) is equivalent to t^2/2 when t-> 0 as suggested before
only trig identities is allowed
start by showing that (1-cos(t))/t^2 -> 1/2 when t-> 0 then
hint: cos(t) = cos(2 * t/2)
2sin^2(x/2)/x^2
2(sinx/2 / x ) ^2
2(1/4)
=1/2
That's not what I would have done
now that you found that (1-cos(t))/t^2 -> 1/2 when t-> 0
why not use it with t = 1-cos(x)
i didnt get it
can u please explain it in mathmatical solution ?
(1-cos(1-cos(x)))/(1-cos(x))^2 -> 1/2
when x -> 0
so now
use this
to find something about this limit
@faint anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hemlo
how to integrate $4\int u^4 \cdot e^{-u^4} du$
Luh Roub
you dont
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Luh Roub
i want to introduce the pi function, respectfully
(at least WA doesnt give it)
what does numerically even mean fr
approximate it
,w factorial of (1/4)
omg

i wouldnt have asked if i wanted to know it asap
I wanna do it w pi function
Hence this question
Simple closed-form expressions of this type do not appear to exist for Gamma(1/n) for n a positive integer n>2.
"just help me integrate something which no one has done so far"
Its been done before wym
if you have an answer which you are aiming for then can you share it?
uh im ideally aiming for this
And so far
Ive introduced the pi function
substituted everything in
but the integrating part
Idk ab that
need the di method and no idea how to apply it here

di method?
yea
a method to write down ibp
ibp wearing glasses and a moustache
di, chi's successor
as was mentioned, there is no nice closed form
that means that you can't write down some expression involving i.e. e, pi, sin/cos etc. that gives you the answer
you can only approximate what the integral equals
and?
different number, different thing
i.e. sin(pi/2), sin(pi/4) etc. all have nice closed forms
sin(1) doesn't
some numbers just dont have a nice form
hmm
makes sense then
how do i tell which one does and which one doesnt have a closed form
gamma(1/2) has a nice expression but gamma(1/3), gamma(1/4) etc do not
plug it into wolframalpha, if wolframalpha gives you the option for a closed form then a closed form exists
if it doesn't have a closed form it probably doesn't exist lol
but anyway in general, most integrals you write down do not have closed forms
because gamma(1/2) can be related to the gaussian integral
in some sense, if someone gave u a random mess of functions, 99/100 it won't have a closed form for the integral
so this means ones that do have a nice closed form are special
indeed
i think like school etc. can skew someone's perspective on the number of functions we can integrate and get a closed form for
ofc in school, they will only ask you things you can integrate
alright thanks lads😔
but most of the time, there just doesn't exist a closed form
nw
wait
holon
i still wanna integrate that🙏
f that closed form
I want 0.9 to appear at the end of my calculations ong
there's lots of ways of numerically integrating a function
i.e. trapezium rule etc.
unfortunately i'm not really that knowledgable on numerical methods so someone might be able to suggest better methods
integration by parts will not get you anywhere on this integral. you're welcome to try it and find out why
Closed by @rocky sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help understanding proofs in discrete math of the types
- Direct
- Contrapositive
- Biconditional
- Proof by induction
- Contradiction
I have some background knowledge on it already, but I still struggle with writing good and rigorous proofs. I struggle specifically with knowing which situation is optimal for each type. Like identifying what might be easier for me try (eg a direct proof vs a proof by contrapositive)
id like to figure out a more structured way of approaching proofs
@native garden Has your question been resolved?
I don't think there's a general strategy here, maybe it'd be easier to give you help if you gave a specific problem where you were having trouble figuring out which type of proof to try?
The thing is there’s no specific problem it’s just
Okay
Firstly here are the course definitions
Here’s an example
Let n be an integer. Prove that if n^3 + 5n is divisible by 6, then n is divisible by 2 or 3 or both
I’ll explain how I’m thinking about the problem and how I would approach it
So we have a few definitions to work with here
We know n exists in Z
We can say that n^3 + 5n = 6m where m is some integer
And now we need to prove that n is divisible by 2 or 3
Well we rewrote n^3 + 5n as 6m
We can set 6m = 3 and solve for m
Set 6m = 2 and solve for m
But I still don’t think this gets to the heart of showing that the proof works in general
And at this point now I’m lost and not sure where to go
For modular arithmetic stuff, when you're thinking about divisibility, I think it's often helpful to argue by cases
Here you could consider six different cases
It's okay, it's not a difficult concept
I literally feel like I can’t get this no matter what
The idea is like this
You just consider all the different possibilities for what n could be
And then prove the statement for all of them
Have you learned about modular arithmetic yet? Like n = 0 (mod 6)
I sort of know it but not really
It wasn’t taught to us exactly
I just know from programming what the mod of a number will be
alright well let's write it like this then
n could either be a multiple of 6
so n = 6k
or it could be a multiple of 6 plus 1, like n = 6k+1
or n = 6k+2 or n = 6k+3 or n = 6k+4 or n = 6k+5
and those are all the possible cases for what n could be
does that make sense?
Maybe?
I get n = 6k
I am not sure on n being a multiple of 6k + 1
Because then this doesn’t cleanly go into what we wanna prove anymore no?
We wanna prove it’s divisible by 6
we want to prove what's divisible by 6?
Wait no
Ugh
We want to say that If It’s divisible by 6 then it is also divisible by 2 or 3
that n is divisible by 2 or 3 right
Yeah
So if we represent it as 6m
Or 6k
Maybe we can prove it’s divisible by 2 or 3 by just dividing it by those values and showing there’s no remainder?
How do you know if it's gonna be divisible by 2 or by 3
If you're dividing by one of them
Ig I don’t
Ugh
Well
Wait
What if I
Take 6k and divide it by 3 to get 2. Then we know for a fact it’s divisible by 2
And then divide it by 2 to get 3
Maybe I’m mixing this up
Ugh
@native garden Has your question been resolved?
@native garden Has your question been resolved?
If you're having trouble with a direct proof, sometimes that's a good sign to try a contrapositive proof instead
What would be the contrapositive of this statement?
(In general, there can be plenty of ways to approach a proof, not just one correct answer)
The contrapositive would be
If n is not divisible by 2 or 3 then n^3 + 5n is not divisible by 6
yup
so now judging based on the cases we said earlier with n = 6k, n = 6k+1, etc.
which ones are possible if n is not divisible by 2 or 3?
@native garden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am doing the part b of this question, and the answer said using the -b/2a method to find the midpoint coordinates. I don't really understand how this -b/2a works and I also remeber there is another few similar rules of these types of equations. Can anyone explain it to me please?
The -b/2a here will give the midpoint of the function and the absolute minimum
It is because the quadratic will form a parabola
And the cordinates of its vertex are -b/2a, -D/4a
The circle equation should have y^2 coeff too
The last equation is terms of x and k
I dunno what you have done but every quadratic in 1 variable has a vertex
Is the definition of vertex mean that its the midpoint of the whole quadratic formula
So you're trying to find the midpoint of a line which cuts a circle
Yes
The whole function is symmetric about its axis , so in a way yes
Lemme think a bit , this is the first time I've seen someone use -b/2a for midpoint of a line
I am processing the correlation between the vertext and the midpoint of the line
Oh
I dont understand the correlation
Hmm
I suppose a better method would be to use sum of roots
Since we can find the cordinates where it will intersect the circle through that quadratic
Wait
They have used that
Basically
x1 + x2 will be -b/a
Sum of roots of a quadratic equation
The midpoint is simply x1 + x2 / 2
Which is
-b/2a
This relates to the graph as well
If you graph the quadratic and find the midpoint of its roots , it will be the vertex
Yeah
There should be a better way too
Use the equation of the line
To find a relation between x1 + x2/2 and y1 + y2/2
Should be easier
Since x1,x2 and y1,y2 satisfy the equation of the line
Yea
Same for y2
Just add them and divide by2
Bro is NOT a chill guy
y1 + y2 / 2 = -(x1 + x2)/2 + k
Use this after finding x1+x2/2 by -b/2a
Ahhhhh
This was a pretty decent question
Lmao this is one of the pass papers for our entrance exams
What are you studying for?
Bro is literally yapping 😭
Wait no its not called entrance exams
Wha...
Is more like diploma for secondary exams
I have no idea what does any of that means
I am only finding the midpoint in terms of k
I dont need exact numbers
Totally
He's just saying anything bro 😭
Ok buddy
.close
.close
Closed by @past comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
please post an actual question you need help with (e.g. a picture of one) in an available help channel
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any idea for this? i'm stumped
initially i want to use this theorem
but again i'm not sure what function to divide it by
my thought was (sqrtx + 1)/(sqrtx + sin^2x)
asks to determine convergence/divergence btw
this is one where i think direct comparison would be simpler
0<= sin^2 x <= 1
yeah, but the problem asks to use comparison theorem
does it specify which? it seems like you have comparison theorems I and II
wait quick check, does comparison theorem I work if it's an improper integral of type II?
what is type II?
type I is the improper integrals where the bounds are infty
type II is the improper integrals where there's a singularity in the interval of the integrals
it does work
interesting
sin^2x is only from 0 to 1
so if we pop that out, the function only gets bigger
sqrt(x) <= sqrt(x) + sin^2(x)
note that if the denominator is smaller then the overall function is larger
crazy
is it
double check your power rule
i love when my integral of x^-1/2 is x^-3/2
oh wait
ok ok i see
oh it converges to 2
thus the original integral must converge
must it?
i mean, yeah?
no?
you did say comparison theorem I also works for type II imp. integrals
it was a trick question you were supposed to say yes
Closed by @valid cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
quick question about this theorem
it said that "Suppose that f and g are functions with f(x), g(x) >= 0"
should they be nonnegative on only the integral's interval, or on its domain?
it does specify that on the slide
wait i misread. but it does for this slide, and it's the same idea
the behavior of the function is only relevant on the integration interval
Closed by @valid cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if 4l^2-5m^2+6l+1=0 then show that the line lx+my+1=0 touches a fixed circle. Find the centre and radius of the circle
@median stag Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@median stag Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which part
your argument of a is (-3pi/4)
for a purely imaginary number we want the arg of a^m to be +-pi/2 or +-3pi/2, the +-pi/2 is not really doable eg if -3mpi/4=pi/2 then -3m=2 so m isnt an integer
so we go for 3pi/2 or -3pi/2 (or equivalent angle)
arg a^m = -3pi/4 * m, lets say we go for -3pi/2 then we can choose m=2, -3pi/4 * 2=-3pi/2 so a^2=i|a|^2
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
I understand your working, but why must a^m be +-pi/2 or +-3pi/2 ?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I expand cubics/quartics fast?
For example (x+1)(×+2)(×+3)
Usually I would just expand them per 2 groups but for a topic in fm (roots of polynomials) I cant be spending ages expanding out brackets where I have alpha and beta and gamma and delta, especially when the risk of making mistakes is high when doing this
Have you heard of the binomial theorem?
Guess it works better for polynomials raised to a power but it has implications here
yes but that would only be for when it's like (2x+3)^3 etc
If that's what ur thinking?
It is
And while it isn't directly applicable here, it has implications about how you can approach this
how so?
hmm perhaps is there another way to approach this whilst there being low implications?
I guess it's not as similar as I initially thought but there's a similar process
The first and last coefficients are easier to get as they involve the first and last terms of each binom directly
We know the first will be x^3 and the fourth will be 3*2*1
Yupp
There is a pattern that the middle two follow that can be used for problems of this nature
Try expanding (x+a)(x+b)(x+c) and see what you get
Yup
That applies to any problem like this, I imagine knowing that would be the fastest way of doing these
"Any problem like this" being three binomials multiplied together
basically I'd have to memorise this form 🥲
If your goal is to expand those problems fast, yeah
Unless you get really quick at multiplying them out
Closed by @heavy blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I already did part a) and b)
I am not sure how to proceed for task c)
-
the eigenvalues are v1=(1,-1) and v2=(0,1)
-
for task b) i have the following solution: first case: stable node; second case: marginally stable (bifurcation point); third case: saddle
according to gpt it should be stable but i don't know how to show it mathematically
@digital gate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
same question as before
<@&286206848099549185>
@digital gate Has your question been resolved?
@digital gate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I solved for sin(2x)=cos(x) where
0 =< x <= 360
and got 30°,90°,150°,270° are my answers correct ?
sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x)
So cos(x) = 0 or 2sin(x) = 1
Did you get the above?
@limpid pond
Yea
I did
Cool, your solution looks correct to me, sorry I had to double check.
Closed by @limpid pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i tried solving it by using a function but i didn't found a way to prove that the derivative is positive for every number in this interval. any help ?
salut
hi
tu es francais?
nah actually im morroco and we study sci things in french
ok sorry i have very bad in maths
does taylor expanding around x=pi/2 work?
im not allowed to use it
it's okay 🙂
wait so what's ur defn of sin then?
but I think you should pass the sin(x) to the other side and expand then factored
and after doing the variation table and after using Maths gpt to check
sin is sin nothing defferent im just not allowed to use the taylor expanding cuz it is not a part of the chapts i studied this semester. i think the arcsin will work because of the interval and stuffs but i dont know how to use it in this case
as in how do you define sine?
normally sine is defined in terms of its taylor expansion
just like sin = y-coordinate on whatever?
ooh talking abt it we dont have a def for the sine not yet we just work with it as a periodic function and to find a special point we just use the formulase to add or multiply sine ans cosine (as i know i will have the taylor series next semester)
i tried it but it doesn't work (i dont know how to prove it )
if you shift everything to one side to get f(x) = sin(x) - 3x/pi + 4x^3/pi^3
you can show that f is concave
f(0) = f(pi/2) = 0
so it must be >= 0
although i'd imagine there's probably some other way of doing the problem tho
cus the RHS feels motivated
but i don't see the motivation
i dont really know how to show that it is concave (i know how to prove it in general but i dont know how to prove it in this cas becuase of the sine thing)
differentiate twice to get 24x/pi - sin(x)
remember ur small angle approximations: sin(x) ~ x
in fact, recall that sin(x) <= x
so that gets you f is concave
great if so it is solved then
this feels unintended tho so there'll probs be some alternate soln
yeah this is what i believe too, but i didnt found any (i have been thinking abt it for the last three days)
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tawdry imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How I do this
either product rule or quotient rule
and chain rule
$u=1+x$
Tenant
Pretty sure that's not needed here
oh sorry
IBP is needed IMO
Well, yeah, as $e^{-2x}$
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
Also, this isn't a test, is it?
yes
@wise oxide Has your question been resolved?
$\int (1+x)/e^2x dx = \int dy$
Tenant
$\int \frac1/2 dx = \int dy$
Tenant
Tenant
frick
$\int e^{-2x} (1+x)$
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
right, so how would you integrate this
yup
Tenant
$dv = e^{-2x}dx$
Tenant
$\int dv = \int e^{-2x}dx$
Tenant
$v = -\frac12 e^{-2x} + c$
Tenant
Who’s even the one asking the question anymore?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gcd(x,y) and gcd(201x + 2y, 100x + y), they’re not always equal right?
since the determinant isn’t 0
wait
they’re always equal cuz the determinant is 1
?
yes
they are probably equal
how do you show this
without this
just a moderately rigorous “proof”
euclids division algorithm?
it’s a multiple choice question
bezout's lemma, probably may work
uhhh looks like effort though
what’s the fastest handwavy way to make an assertion
gcd is preserved under transformations with determinant 1 matrix for 201x + 2y and 100x + y determinant is 201 × 1 - 2 × 100 equals 1 gcd property holds since any linear combination of x and y has the same gcd check using matrix transformations and gcd definitions
gcd(201x+2y,100x+y)=gcd(201x+2y-2(100x+y),100x+y)=gcd(x,100x+y)=gcd(x,y)
it’s not a proofs class so i don’t need to “prove it”, just need to show they’re always equal (to an extent)
hmm okay yeah this works
okay then thanks guys
.close
Closed by @honest creek
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
George is about to get a certain amount of change less than one dollar from the cash register. If he gets the most quarters possible and the rest in pennies, he would need to receive $3$ pennies to meet the amount. If he gets the most dimes possible and the rest in pennies, he would need to receive $8$ pennies to meet the amount. What is the sum, in cents, of the possible amounts of change that he is trying to get?
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
like
25Q + 3 = 10D + 8
Q is number of quarters and D is number of dimes
25Q + 3 < 100
because 100 cents is a dollar
the amount x satisfies two conditions:
- x ≡ 3 (mod 25)
- x ≡ 8 (mod 10)
solve this system of congruences to find the possible values of x
how
substitute x = 25k + 3 into x ≡ 8 (mod 10) then solve for k
(25k+3) = 8 mod 10
25Q + 3 = 10D + 8
25Q - 10D = 5
5(5Q - 2D) = 5
5Q - 2D = 1
(5Q - 1)/2 = D
Case Q = 1
Case Q = 1, D = 2
Case Q = 2, D = Impossible
Case Q = 3, D = 7
28 + 78
,calc 28 + 78
Result:
106
.solved
Closed by @buoyant jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is 1
I forgot to add the floor in last two lines, assume it is there🙏🏼
I am evaluating the integral at the top of this page
@kindred kernel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yeah but a finite zeta
Yeha ig i could have zeta approximated too
But euler-maclaurian seemed straightfoward so i did it
One second. I dont wanna take a photo so imma whip my notepad out
The expansion is consistent with the formula, but the higher-order corrections could use clearer notation to show B little 2(x-⌊x⌋)
think Bernoulli polynomials
B subscript 2(x−⌊x⌋)=(x−⌊x⌋) exponent 2 −(x−⌊x⌋)+ 1 over 6
rewriting the integral term would look like
While 𝐵 subscript 2 is well-defined, higher-order corrections (like 𝐵 subscript 4) are computationally intensive, so explicitly truncating the series or providing a bound on the neglected terms is helpful
fhis approximation works
but it disregards the slower-decaying terms, which could be significant for small 𝑖
As for the second one, it looks consistent, yet I am not 100% sure.
Sure but R_p in Euler-Maclaurin’s can be adjusted no?
And here since we just need a closed form
Shouldn’t this be sufficient(further terms decay tremendously fast)
Im in geometry
my dads a math professor at the university in my town
Okay wait back to locking in
If precision is required for small 𝑖 the higher-order corrections or numerical summation may be necessary. For large 𝑖 the existing approximation is indeed sufficient.
I can elaborate on practical ways to adjust 𝑅 subscript 𝑝 if needed maybe
@kindred kernel
Hmm yeah that would help, since the form im getting now( that infinite sum of g(i)) doesn’t seem to converge
“In geometry” as in?
are we talking first or second
As in geometry one 😭 I just needed an extra math credit
Op
First pic
I mean thats actually the second page
But yeah
agh I need to re go through it one second
Im thinking it has to do with the periodic nature or slower-decaying terms that weren't sufficiently like addressed in the approximation
Higher-order terms involving said B subscript 4 (x−⌊x⌋), 𝐵 subscript 6 (𝑥−⌊𝑥⌋) etc., would add similarly structured corrections. These are crucial when g(𝑖) is being ssummed over a like range where the periodic terms accumulate without decaying quickly
If 𝑔(𝑖) represent a contribution from the periodic correction terms, and the resulting sum doesn't converge, then I think the issue if there is any is that of insufficien\t Damping
Periodic terms like ⌊𝑥⌋−𝑥 decay slower than the main terms in the expansion, especially for small 𝑖 Including higher 𝑅 subscript 𝑝-terms will provide additional damping.
or Improper Approximation of Remainder
If 𝑔(𝑖) is derived from an incomplete 𝑅 subscript 𝑝-term (e.g., only using 𝐵 subscript 2 without adjusting higher-order corrections) could lead to divergence I think
@kindred kernel Has your question been resolved?
These terms rapidly damp out for large 𝑖 but also ensure convergence for smaller 𝑖
If the same divergence continues, maybe try techniques like zeta-function regularization for the periodic components to handle the slow decay
Excuse me if im wrong, im not too good at this
@kindred kernel What are we thinking
Ahh ok so we move back to zeta
Nice
Oh yeah i tried adding the B_3 term and doing again, still getting divergence
So i’ll try zeta later
Thanks a lot
Im all over the place w ts
Sorry 😭
Closed by @kindred kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do iii
use that fact that $1+\cos {2\theta}=2\cos^{2}{\theta}$
convergence
@wispy ledge Has your question been resolved?
Ok one sec
@wispy ledge Has your question been resolved?
@wispy ledge Has your question been resolved?
@wispy ledge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please explain why we aren't considering the D in the middle of PDP^-1
OOOH NVM I GET IT
Lol
LMFAO 🤦 hahaha
,close
.close
Closed by @unkempt violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What differentiation rule is used to get from the 1st image to the 2nd?
.close
Closed by @spark hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think you have a typo in your second integral
Show the original question
It should be squared
vsr
vsr
(vsr = volume of solid revolution)
@narrow bay Has your question been resolved?
@narrow bay Has your question been resolved?
@narrow bay Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there is a function in x,y say $f(x,y)$ we would like to decrease or minimize so I will take the partial derivative of $f$ wrt $x$ and $y$
$$
\begin{align}
\text{let } x' & =\dv{f(x,y)}{x} \
y' & =\dv{f(x,y)}{y} \
\end{align}
$$
here $x'$ and $y$' are in the direction in which the $f(x,y)$ increases so we will do $f(x-\Delta x',y-\Delta y')$ then is it guaranteed that $f(x-\Delta x',y-\Delta y')<f(x,y)$ for $\Delta$ small enough is not can you give me an example
greenflame41
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
@void pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Asta, Bronya, and Clara all have different numbers of cats. They had the tollowing conversation.
i. Bronya to Clara: You have the most cats.
ii. Asta to Bronya: I have exactly 30% more cats than you.
iii. Asta to Clara: The number of cats you have is the average between the number of cats I have and the number of cats Bronya has.
iv. Clara to Asta: You have at least 4 more cats than me.
However, not all of these statements are true. When speaking to someone with fewer cats, the speaker always tells the truth, and when speaking to someone with more cats they always lie.
Wanted to check that I did this right
looks fun
Statements 1 and 4 are contradictory
So they’re false
If clara had more cats than bronya then she would be lying meaning it’s false
So bronya has less cats than clara
what if the two has the same amount of cats
It says they have different numbers of cats
the negation of > is < ^ =
That would be a catastrophe wouldn't it?
ah
ba dum tiss 🥁
So we can use same logic for statement 4 right
maybe I'm stupid but I think you can only conclude that they can't be both true
or equivalently at least one is false
due to contradiction
why are they both false?
For statement 4
If clara was telling the truth, then asta has more cats than clara which would mean she is lying.
So the order is BCA
And then we just use equations
A = B * 1.3
And C = (A+B)/2
This is where I got a bit confused
yea?
just to make A an integer?
B = 20 ends up working
sure
Yeah
So idk if that’s the way to do it
Seems a bit weird wondering if there’s a nicer way
It was asked in a quant trading interview
So I’d expect it’d have a nice solution
c = 1.15B anyway this requirws B to me a multiple of 20
wait rhis means c>b a conteadiction
No c>b is correct if 1 is false then then clara has more then bronya has less than clara
Yh true ig
c > b implies the first is true
but you concluded its false
anyway I might gtg sry feeling sleepy now
If Clara has less than bronya then then bronya would be telling the truth to Clara
In statement one
.close
Closed by @quick sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I have the following problem. I have troubles writing a formal, rigorous proof that what I've came up with so far is indeed correct - I don't really know how to start going about it.
I'm sorry, there should be a n^2th root, not just square
@prisma dock Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @prisma dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got the idea to change it to 16((cos50-cos10)^2+cos10cos50) but im not sure how to continue
Is this the original expression
yes
you could expand the square
I think you can do cos10^2+cos(60-10)^2-sin(60-20)sin(60+20) and then like relate the 20 with the cos10 thing maybe?
cos10^2+(cos60cos10+sin60sin10)^2-(sin60cos20) ^2-(cos60sin20)^2 could lead to smth ig
@proud basin Has your question been resolved?
hm ok
@proud basin Has your question been resolved?
.close oh i got it tyy
Closed by @proud basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with these two questions:
You can depress a general cubic $Ax^2+Bx^2+Cx+D$ with the substitution $x=y-\frac{B}{3A}$
SWR
interesting... what does this formula mean
If you replace x with y-B/3A, the x² term will disappear
That solves b for you, does it not?
@nova dagger Has your question been resolved?
oh alr
ok but for 8, idk how ur meant to prove the following equation by completing the square. the only way i could prove it is by substituing those values and eventually making both sides equal
you have an $a^2$ term, a $b^2$, and an $ab$ term. By completing the square correctly, you can get an $(a+b)^2$ term. You also have an $c^2$ term and an $ac$ term. So you turn that into an $(a+c)^2$ term. How you do that exactly is where you need to use the completing-the-square technique.
SWR
hmm
where did I lose you?
(sqrt3a+2b)^2 + (a+3sqrt2c)^2 = 4ab+12ac+a^2+4sqrt3ab+6sqrt3ac
@nova dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @nova dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
implicit differentiation idk where to start
what's the differential of $x^2$ wrt x
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
2x
now differentiate $-5xy$ wrt x
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
remember to use the product rule
5xy'+5y
6y*y'
2x-5xy'+5y+6y*y'=0
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
Closed by @tropic bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me ex 109
For part a), I think it would suffice to write all of those squared norms as inner products and expand both sides
and part b) says to me triangle inequality but I haven't tested that theory out (as does every problem in anything adjacent to real analysis, linear algebra, or any field really)
@cursive flower Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cursive flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there any formula for this?
@kind iris Has your question been resolved?
Just some things that come to mind that may or may not be useful
If P=S then trivially the answer is 1.
If S = P - 1 then the answer is 3.
if S <= 1 then No solution, and T<1 then also no solution
A complete graph has $\frac{n(n-1)}{2}$ edges, so the lower bound of subgraphs you need for a full cover is $\frac{P(P-1)}{S(S-1)}$
LooseEthics
$\frac{P(P-1)}{T \cdot S(S-1)}$?
S1p3k
well, the thing is that this is not the soltuion every time and doesn't have to satisfy the result all the time
Not necessarily, since some subgraphs can't coexist
So is there a solution?
I mean obviously there is, worst case scenario you can just brute force it
how?
Found the name for this, it's called the clique problem. The minimum number of cliques that form a cover of the complete graph is what I posted before. Accounting for multiple tables then the solution should be $\lceil\frac{P(P-1)}{min(T, \lfloor\frac{P}{S}\rfloor)S(S-1)}\rceil$
LooseEthics
if T = 1, S = 500, P = 2, then it is min(1, floor(2/500)) that is min(1, 0) that is 0 so the denominator is 0?




