Channel closed
Closed by @neat elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 194 of 1
Closed by @neat elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you as well
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello!
I’m having trouble finding the rest of my dots in this quadratic graph
I was wondering if anyone can lead me in the right direction
Almost got the hang of this but so confusing
I’m on question D I tried to lay out my steps as best as possible
Sorry if it’s messy
in other words, graph ur quadratic?
@toxic dome Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @toxic dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i just want to check if the final answer is okay, going from polar coordinates to cartesian
@fallen swallow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Looks fine so far
Oh no
r = sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
So r^3 = ?
oh [sqrt(x^2 + y^2)]^3
i get stuck when operating with this, i recognize the form of each term in polar coordinates but my teacher said to also graph the equation. basically i get lost trying to simplify
Square both sides at this step
you mean this?
i know that step but after doing so i struggle to simplify and obtain a familiar polar equation
i was thinking of a Lemniscate but i cant get that form
No idea what this is supposed to be
I meant square your last line once you fix the mistake
cartesian to polar and then finding the graph
why though? that would just make the right side a mess with a cubic root. or is it necessary?
No
,tex .exp rules
riemann
@fallen swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fallen swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i have found that the rank of the rref is 2. does this mean it spans a plane?
yep that's what it would mean if the rank is 2
I don't understand this at all could someone help?
@ruby matrix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ego
Haha
ego
@bright meteor Has your question been resolved?
@bright meteor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what will the terms be?
sure
you need a description of how the terms are ordered based on the b_i
that is true but you need more than that
find a simpler way to describe when one term is bigger than another without actually using the /7 stuff
b1 = 3, b2 = 6, b3 = 6, b4 = 6
b1 = 4, b2 = 0, b3 = 0, b4 = 0
which one is higher
ah whatever
this is just decimal expansion in base 7
the digits are b1, b2, b3, b4 in order
$0.b_1b_2b_3b_4$
Dreyuk
so you do this the same way you compare decimals
yes
No it's not gonna be both of them
Oh wait
what are you getting for all 4 values?
oh maybe i'm off by 1
2020th from the top is 402nd from the bottom
,w 402 in base 7
ok yea looks good
Closed by @rocky oriole
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no worries lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i calculated the individual probabilities using the binomial pd list function on calculator and tried to use the complement rule to find 1-P(1st group has less successes) but that clearly takes too much time
so what's the correct way
if the number of successes in the first is at least the number of successes in the second then x_1 >= x_2 hence x_1 - x_2 >= 0
@vague tendon Has your question been resolved?
im srry but im not rlly fully getting it
<@&286206848099549185>
@vague tendon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
b right?
.close
Closed by @lyric kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yes, if I’m not stupid
ok tyty
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @hollow ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
idk
what is the equation of f(x)
We don’t know
Answering something that the data wasn't given
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Extremely sorry I'm making another channel
A question came in my test today, it said: Let $L$ be a line $x + y + 1 = 0$, find the inclination of it from the y-axis.
I answered $\frac{\pi}{4}$
But I want to know, what's the complete definition of inclination of a line from another line.
@misty plume
If I say let my line be $L_1$ whose inclination from $L_2$ is asked, is it necessary that the angle swept must be taken from $L_2$ to $L_1$ counter-clockwise ?
@misty plume
@misty plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @misty plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I
No
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how am i supposed to calculate the tolerance?
i'm solving a for now
do i use R_s and then make a jacobian matrix?
a 1 row 3 collumn jacobian matrix
first partial wrt R_1 second wrt R_2 and third wrt R_3 ?
then what can i multiply it by?
@sharp sonnet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
damn no one
no
its in my math book
its first order approximations
no partial derivatives
but it ain't physics 💀
.close
Closed by @sharp sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lim x->- inf of (x^3+x+1)/e^x
you can use l'hopital when you have an indeterminate inf/inf or 0/0
both x³ + x + 1 and e^x go to infinity as x grows
oh mb i meant x-> - inf
what do you get if you use l'hopital
so you can't use l'hopital then
because it's not of this form
so this
riemann
if i get something like inf/0 it just means that my approach is wrong?
the signs generally have to be the same, but you can just factor out a - sign from the fraction outside the limit
this implies they have to be the same sign
Closed by @burnt abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I find the diagonal asymptote for this function? (x^2)/(x-1)
I'll have to search that up but thanks!
one second, and I'll show you a different example.
Oki
ok sorry
going to start now
I'm going to divide x^3 + 3x^2 + 3 by x+2
First, we write down our division in long division form. Except instead of powers of 10, we're concerned with powers of x. Other than that it's remarkably similar, and actually somewhat simpler (as our "ones" cannot affect our "tens" so to speak)
_____________________
x+2 | x^3 + 3x^2 + 0x + 3
Now we consider x^3 + 3x^2, how many times does x + 2 go into this value?
It goes into it x^2 times!
x^2
_____________________
x+2 | x^3 + 3x^2 + 0x + 3
Now we multiply x^2 by x+3 to get x^3 + 2x^2 and subtract.
x^2
_____________________
x+2 | x^3 + 3x^2 + 0x + 3
-x^3 - 2x^2
-----------
x^2 + 0x
Next, we consider how many times x+2 goes into x^2, this is x times.
x^2 + x
_____________________
x+2 | x^3 + 3x^2 + 0x + 3
-x^3 - 2x^2
-----------
x^2 + 0x
-x^2 - 2x
---------
- 2x + 3
How many times does x+2 go into -2x + 3? That's -2 times.
x^2 + x - 2
_____________________
x+2 | x^3 + 3x^2 + 0x + 3
-x^3 - 2x^2
-----------
x^2 + 0x
-x^2 - 2x
---------
- 2x + 3
-(-2x - 4)
----------
7
Finally, we can't put x+2 into 7, so we have 7 as our remainder.
So this mean:
[
\frac{x^2 + 3x^2 + 3}{x+2} = x^2 + x - 2 + \frac{7}{x+2}
]
OmnipotentEntity
And so our asymtote is going to be the parabola x^2 + x - 2
and the remainder goes to zero as x becomes large.
this is eally amazing
ahh okay
I WAS WATCHING THIS THE WHOLE TIME
It's literally the same thing.
It's the same thing, one is just a shortcut
nope synthetic is simpler and faster
Yes, but I'm doing this to teach why it works
at the end you get the same result
I switched schools and I have no clue what those things are😭 I'm writing a test tomorrow
CaptainNova22
oh good, at least I didn't screw up 😄
Synthetic is shortcut to long division
yeah
oki
wow you can do poly divisionhere ??
I'll go over it and see if I get the write answer then
anyway, use synthetic division or polynomial long division, whichever you feel more comfortable with.
to find the limiting behavior of the function
will do
!!!!!!!!!!
remember
synthetic division only works when the polynomial you're dividing by has degree 1
otherwise you have to use long division
okay
Thank you!
slick latex function btw
CaptainNova22
There's teh synthetic division
.close
Closed by @red parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone can help with this? i need to use first order approximation to find the overall tolerance.
You could also subtract and add 1 in the numerator (and then split the fraction)
no worries take you time
if you can help that'd be great
three ?
😂
790 and not 20%
less
yeah
what did you do to get it
damn
yeah
and the resistance
,
not .
should come out to about 59.96
for B its 5.64
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
thats what the answer key says
yeah
probably
its an approximation so
yes please
uhh okay
you used this to find the final value
yeah
nono i did understand
thank you
.close
Closed by @sharp sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How did he get the -1
@quasi cedar Has your question been resolved?
I dont understand
this is correct yes
Im confused
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I solved a) pretty easily, slope =-1 and intercept @ L.
For b, I've managed to find that $\beta = \varphi - \theta$ since using the interior sums of the triangle $\beta=\pi - (\theta + z)$ where $z$ is $\pi - \varphi$
This feels like it should be simple trig rules but i've been inventing so many new useless angles and I could use some help 🫠
NyanSequitur
@jaunty idol Has your question been resolved?
this angle is $\pi-\pi/2-\sigma$ i think
NyanSequitur
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed by @jaunty idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is it asking?
Graph the following piecewise functions, using graphing techniques. Also, determine their domain and range.
Can you graph $3-(x+2)^2$?
Azyrashacorki
I need graph 3 - (x+2)^2; if -4 < 4 < x < -1
2 + √x+1; if x > -1
I know. The point is that if you can graph $3 - (x+2)^2$, then you can draw it between $-4$ and $-1$.
Azyrashacorki
Yes
@steel moth Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
ziming
solve for the 2 x intercepts
y intercept
vertex
and you should have enough to graph
this is a piecewise function?
ah nvm i see
plug in the x boundary values of this inequality
you have your vertex
so plot your vertex first
plot it up to -1
then plot your second function
@steel moth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @steel moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i need one helper let him speak spanish
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @quiet lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How they know R=1
The geometric series converges to 1/(1-t^3) if |t^3| < 1, so that is equivalent to |t| < 1.
Multiplying by t and integrating doesn't change the radius
So I always put the r in 1/1-r into <1 and that’s it?
So it will always be 1
I mean in this case yes, but if you had like $\frac{1}{1 - \frac{t}{2}}$, then your radius would be 2
Azyrashacorki
So u cube root the 1 also right? Cus u always wanna get x alone in order to get radius?
Is that how it works
Yes
Ok also for all these types of questions that says evaluate the integral that already has an integral in front I don’t need to find what c is?
No, because C can be anything, so you couldn't find C even if you wanted.
Yeah I meant for any single question that asks for power series representation that has an integral sign already
@wise oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi just had a quick question
this question here i got an awnser like (−∞,−4)∪[1,2)∪(2,∞).
but when i saw an lecturer example of a simular question like
they gave an awnser like
do i need to reformat my solution to what my lecturer did im not sure anymore
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@hot island Has your question been resolved?
yeah i would but this coursework due in too soon
so i dont rlly have time
however if the awnser above is also correct
its still an interval isnt it
uhhh well its a university lecturer
so your not rlly personal with them
but if i was to guess im not sure tbh
yeah alright ill give it a go and see what he say
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @hot island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
couldn't part (ii) be done without bringing in the supremum norm?
WHy even mention it
seems so random
neither the definition of the unfirom convergence nor uniform cauchy requires it
do you have brain damage
??
gone
you don't have to explicitly use the supremum norm, but the condition:
f_n(x) - f(x) < epsilon for all x in D
is equivalent to
||f_n - f||_infinity < epsilon
so you can say it either way
so basically, I get to save a few words
and not say "for all x in D"
yes
but then you have to do extra work for the triangle inequality part
using the fact that uniform convergence is equivalent to convergence in the sup norm just makes life easier in general
@alpine basalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys, in which situation do we use Way A, and in which situation do we use Way B?
Way A is adding the column of “others (other letters beside P and E)”
Way B is adding all multiplying all columns (Letter O, Letter R, and other letters beside O and R) in each row and then adding each row
@near elbow Has your question been resolved?
@near elbow Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @near elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
🦕
🦕
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I do part B ?
Im new to matrix my answers for 1a) is k = 2 , and eigenvalue = 12
great so you need to find the eigenvectors of A now
you need to solve the system $6x - 3y = 12x$ and $2x + 7y = 12y$ then
south, just south
well the point is to find m, n
this comes from $Ax = \lambda x$
south, just south
um ```
A = [6 -3; 2 7]
A =
6 -3
2 7
eig(A)
ans =
6.5 + 2.39791576165636i
6.5 - 2.39791576165636i
it also can be arranged into $(A - \lambda I)x = 0$
south, just south
oh good point
did I do something wrong in part a?
well first of all, the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
so they can't be 4 and 12
oh
so use that to find the second eigenvalue
then use that the determinant is the product of the eigenvalues in order to find k
very very smart
so use det(A-eigenvalue2) = 0?
yea you can do it that way
how to i stop occuping this chat ?
dot close
.close
Closed by @amber birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solving this
which part?
@sly fractal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo mathcord
its been a while
STEMS by CMI, problem 5, 2024, Category-A
Where do I even start?
linEx
linEx?
linearity of expectation
uhh i think u mean i gotta do sum prob*outcome?
whats the expected minimum of any random 2tuple
then you have 5 tuples
et voila
done
i dont know 😐
that is precisely the problem
i know the expectation is a+b/2 i think
given a pair, what is the probability 1 is the minimum of said pair
better question
how many items are in your sample space
and how many of them have one as a minimum
9?
well..thats almost always true no?
until and unless its a doublet
which cant happen in this case
oh right cus 10C2
so its 5*9/45?
no
you have to figure out the probability that 2,3,4... are minimum
and add that to your expected value
Closed by @brave spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
end part
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i did the whole Lagrangian and then minimised it
$\mathcal{L}(w, \lambda, \gamma) = \frac{1}{2}w^\prime \Sigma w + \lambda(1 - w^\prime 1) + \gamma(\mu - w^\prime z)$
DW1
$\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial w} = \Sigma w - \lambda 1 - \gamma z$
DW1
$\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = 1 - w^\prime 1$
DW1
$\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \gamma} = \mu - w^\prime z$
DW1
@spare idol Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@spare idol Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> quick douibt, what is integral from 1 to 2 ,x^2 d(lnx)
here since its wrt lnx, so lnx belongs to [1,2] right? and not x
yea but obviously limits will change
no
wont it be from e to e^2
wait sorry my brain is completely fried
honestly im pretty sure the limits dont need to be changed
idk tho
its bedtime
@spare idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure how id solve this tbh
Venn diagram it
yeah I think this question is conditional probability
but the Venn diagram part helps with finding P(woman AND goes out of business)
@vague tendon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help solving this?
@summer geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I have this it says study the continue and the derivability of F and G and then calculate G'
What steps should I do here?
Also consider if the bound goes to inf what will change?
@last hound Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
E
E?
are both supposed to be F
Oh sorry, second one is G
g looks straight forward you can bring e^x(x+1) out of integration sign
as we are integrating wrt to t
Yeah, but I wanna study the continuous and the derivability of these 2 integrals and I guess using theory , not directly calculate the integers
i mean g is just a normal exponential function so it would be continous and dif on R
Alr, so what about F
im not sure honestly are sure its -x^2.t^3 in the power
@last hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would the finished product of constructing a parallelogram ABCD look like if AB = 7cm and AD = 5cm but A=30°
@turbid tinsel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
@turbid tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Sketch Re(ln(z)) = 2 on an argand diagram
.close
Closed by @hot pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@hot pewter did you get it?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yh i did
.close
Closed by @hot pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
Help especially with 3.1 is the anyone with macro economics knowledge
🙏
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Closed by @proven stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Me and my classmate took a 20 item multiple choice exam and we got the same score and even had the same answers in each item, what is the probability of that happening
theres a 1 in 4 chance that both of you match on one question
so there'll be a (1/4)^20 chance that you match on all 20 questions
$\left( \frac{1}{4} \right)^{20}$
DW1
@green plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a question from a national high school exam in a central european country.
Complex numbers are not a part of the high school syllabus there so students are not expected to know they exist when writing the exam.
The task is to solve the equation:
the equation has 3 real solutions, and 2 complex solutions.
According to the markscheme the correct answer is the 3 real solutions.
And now the actual question:
,w solve (x³ + 125)(x² - 64) = 0
“Solve the equation:”
do you have a screenshot?
- is the markscheme wrong? The three real solutions are not all the existing solutions
No. If the equation exists in the domain of real numbers, then there are only three solutions
- if a student answers with real and complex solutions, can their answer be then treated as incorrect?
Probably.
If the student cannot explain that they choose 3 real and 2 complex solutions, then the grader has no way to know. Ultimately, the wording of the problem is poor. It should ask "find the number of distinct real solutions", or the beginning of the exam should clarify that all solutions are expected to be real-valued numbers.
The wording is as it is, and there is no clarification at the beginning. The domain isn’t mentioned. It’s just assumed that no one who takes the exam knows what complex numbers are. The markscheme says to reward the two points only if the answer is -8, 8 and -5. Any other answer, less/more solutions, etc and the student receives 0 points as the grader must follow the markscheme
Considering all the facts, is the question/markscheme wrong or am I missing something?🤷♂️
It has left the realm of right or wrong. It is simply poorly worded.
@slate gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Discrete Fourier Transform Q
I have some signal [0,1,0,-1] and the DFT of it is [0,-i/2,0,i/2] and I have no interpretation as to why
I get that the first DFT value must be 0 since the constant component of the signal is 0
but why for frequency 1 the value -i/2 and for frequency 3 the value i/2 idk
I thought I'd use this signal as simple example as it mimics a sine curve, so I thought I'd get only one component in the DFT with magnitude 1, but instead I have 2 now
did you get this DFT from python?
or did you calculate it
for python you have to be careful because it returns the FFT in a specific way
@lilac siren Has your question been resolved?
calculate
yes numpy doesn't normalize, it'd yield [0,-2i,0,2i] instead
I mainly don't get how the DFT explains the initial signal
oh i see
i understand ur q now
your signal [0,1,0,-1] is a sinusoid
a REAL sinusoid
aand
$\sin(x) = \frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$
rain
so you decomposed a sine into its two complex exponentials
and also
if the signal is real
then the transform is conjugate symmetric
@lilac siren Has your question been resolved?
ooh that's slick
sry for delay btw
Closed by @lilac siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I watched 3B1B's DFT series in parallel :]
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
missed a day in class what is this vector chart????
x vs t being displacement vs time and v vs t being velocity vs time
how do i relate that visual to the graphs?
well you already drew v vs t it looks like
sort of
are you having trouble with x vs t?
okay, well let's think about what the visualization means in real life
suppose you move at a constant velocity for 1 second.
you have some x0 before you started moving, and some x1 after
what can we say about the relationship between x0 and x1? assuming your velocity is positive, is x1 greater than x0, equal or less? if it's greater or less, how does it change with respect to time (is it linear [smooth] or quadratic [curved])
looks pretty smooth to me
suppose these two lines describe a points position with respect to time
can you visualize what their motion might look like
are either of them moving at a constant speed (initially)? what does the flat line mean?
the speed and velocity of the line and the curve are the same though the speed of the linear lines is constant and the red speeds up with respect to y
the blue ones speed and velocity are faster because the path is more direct
you are right that the blue line is linear, and that that implies constant speed, but an important thing to realize here is that this says nothing about path
these particles are both traveling in a straight line
but the total distance of the red one is higher because the path is less direct
the path is not less direct, they are both traveling along the same path
let me try to illustrate this
the velocity which is the x of the graph
time is x, displacement is y
"position with respect to time"
1/3(y/x) is the velocity but the distance is different, if you integrated and then found the +x and the +y of a couple points the distance would be different??? this is what my teacher taught me
im just confused about the motion map
im trying to build your intuition for the motion map
imagine each of these slivers as being different momentsi n time in the motion of these particles
you can see that they both take a straight line to get to their destination
the path is, literally, the same
the blue line in the graph i drew represents the motion of the blue dot, you can tell it has a constant speed because it moves the same distance between every instant (assuming these instants are equally spaced, which they are)
the red line represents the red dot. you can tell its speed isnt constant because it starts out slower, and then ends up getting to the end first. essentially, it accelerated.
the flat line at the end depicts when they stop
even though there speed is zero, they are still displaced from their original starting position
they arent moving, so it doesnt go up, but they are still displaced. if they returned to their starting positions, the graph would show a fall back down to 0.
let's look at this example now
this is sort of what you should "see" when you look at a visualization like that
it moves at a constant speed, then stops. then repeat.
the reason that this visualization is so helpful is because it actually draws the line for you
does any of this not make sense?
yeah i never got told any about the motion map i dont get why its going up
the y axis is displacement
the further away from your starting position you go, the more it should go up.
where from the map does the displacement come from
velocity
its velocity vs. time
if you move at a constant speed, then in a given amount of time you move a set distance (the same distance no matter what)
look at these side-by-side
in the first "section" of the velocity graph, you are moving
so from t=0 to t=1, you move some distance
in the second section, you arent moving
so from t=1 to t=2, you havent moved
in the third section you move again, so from t=2 to t=3, you've moved the same distance you moved the first time (i.e. "constant" velocity)
awesome i see so velocity 4/7 bc 4up 7right?
i mean, sure, but units, units, units. each of those gaps could be 10m, and so your velocity would be 40 meters in 7 seconds.
the numerical values aren't really the point, its more the trend you have to see
but yes, 4/7 is a constant, so if you wanted you could say (4/7 m) / second, you'd get the same trend
still confused?
on getting the motion map to the t,x graph not really i think but could you explain the v vs t
0
right, so if its velocity vs. time, where will the line be during those times?
+1v
on the ground and the other one is +1v
how do you write a math expression for that
well, you wouldnt normally need to. but if you are curious, let's say you have constant velocity for c time, and then 0 velocity for c time, back and forth
t is current time & v is the constant velocity you travel at, and v(t) describes the function of velocity vs time,
v(t) = v*mod(floor(t/c), 2) i believe?
im not sure thats what im asking lol
nvm this is wrong, its something like v(ceil(mod/t/c, 2) - 1)
oh weird
i was trying to find that earlier i couldnt get it lol
oh wait
no i think i was right, lol
yeah i just put it in wrong
well actually its v*mod(floor( (t-c) / c, 2)
for intervals of length 2 and velocity 10, for example
strange ill just ask him tomorrow
i do find that question odd i wonder if thats actually what hes asking
im not sure you can do that without modular division and it seems unlikely to see that in a physics course
well, an introductory one
i dont think your answer to part d is right
4/7= 0.57?
thats for a straight line, though. if you evaluated that at t = 1 you would not get what you expect
yeah it woulld be 0.60x/t
no, in general you cant use slope here
notice how at the yellow line the blue != red
red is your actual line, blue is what slope (rise/run) will give you
well the red line linearized is the blue line which is what he wants i believe i missed a day lol
actually this is more accurate but same idea
blue line is basically just an average
if that's what he wants thats what he wants
but that's an odd way to phrase it
no the velocity of the red line is constant
the graph on the right is what the velocity of the red line is
it doesnt increase w time
ik the velocity of the red and blue is the same right
the blue line doesnt really have much significance here; its basically a heuristic to guess where the particle is given t. without knowing what intervals it stops at
on average.
same distance/time overall but in general red is either faster or slower depending on if its moving or not
its like if you raced usain bolt, except he took breaks
well yeah i forgot it is called Vsubscribt(avg)
oh
well, yeah if that's what you are looking for. still dont think that the way the question was asked implies that at all
so would it would like 1xbreak1,1xbreak1,so on
if u get my thinking
like how would you write one
that one is a bit harder, tbh
i added bc i saw the mutual server
im not really active there anymore
also i have another question about the graphs
ye
you can see i sorta added the area and got 6.5xt @ t=5 and the other was 3x^2/t @=5 obvioulsy it happens because they are different kinds of graphs but the units i got are different and could or couldnt be equal???
is this a weird question?
why are you adding the area ? basically just integrating
im sorta a nerd and just thought to for some reason
yeah basically
yeah this was the idea but the integration is crossed out bc my teacher said integration bad
do you think the answers i got for each graph could be the same?
you shouldnt integrate displacement, you get something called absement which is a topic you'll probably never see
the integral of velocity is displacement, though.
so if you sum up all those areas you under v vs t you should get the final displacement
why doesnt x*t work though?
displacement * time?
thats absement
its just a unit you wont use
it works but it doesnt mean anything useful
but is it equal to the disp or you cant know bc its with time?
you are confusing me .-.
dt as in Δtis change in time
dt as in dt in an integral, is the integration of any function with respect to the variable t, usually velocity or acceleration with respect to time t
the velocity / acceleration comment was an analogy. im saying the units you create by completely arbitrarily choosing to take the integral of position, create "absement" and that "absement" is as different from displacement as velocity is from acceleration. neither pair really makes sense to compare to each other.
distance / time is speed
distance / time * time = distance, which is displacement
so, distance * time would be absement. the integral of a constant displacement d with respect to time, is d*t, yes. this would be in units of "meter seconds"
metre-second is wild
not meters per second or feet per second, just.. "per second"
weird
its was just a bunch of random units on x and y
welp goodnight im not active on osu server but i play
@lime pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know of a variant of the Bradley-Terry model that deals with ties and player-/match-specific control variables? Is it a sensible approach for a logistic regression implementation to just add explanatory variables on top of the player dummies? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley–Terry_model
The Bradley–Terry model is a probability model for the outcome of pairwise comparisons between items, teams, or objects. Given a pair of items i and j drawn from some population, it estimates the probability that the pairwise comparison i > j turns out true, as
where pi is a positive real-valued score assigned to individual i. The comparison i ...
@weary trench Has your question been resolved?
@weary trench Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to know when is x^2 - x is decreasing in magnitude after 0
you mean on what interval?
yes
find the derivative, set it equal to 0 and solve for x, this is the "critical point"
when its not changing at all, that means its flat, and on either side of that point it must either increase or decrease
find the side its decreasing on and then you should have the interval
for example if it decreases after the critical point (from x = k to infinity), then your interval is $[k, \infty)$
if it decreases before the critical point, your left bound is 0 (per the problem), so the interval is $[0, k)$ (or if 0 is not included, $(0, k)$
actually its been years since i did cal 1, i dont remember if you include the critical point here
i dont think so though
Karma
wait
What's the answer then?
I am asking decrease in magnitude, not decrease in value
huh? is this something i havent heard of lol? is the magnitude not the y value?
The magnitude is abs(f(x))
oh, duh
wouldnt it just be inverted
at the critical point in the normal function, it is decreasing on the left and increasing on the right
in the abs function, it is decreasing on the right, increasing on the left
So the answer is from 0.5 to 1?
well, yes, but the abs adds extra steps to get there
in general:
solve for the 0s of the original function
take the derivative
find the critical point
plug that into the original function
if its positive, dont invert when checking increasing/decreasing
if its negative, invert
the answer is then the critical point to the (post inversion if applicable) zero of the original function in that direction, if there is none, the infinity in that direction, unless you have another bound
i believe
in this case, critical point is x = 0.5, and it decreases on the left. but in the original function, f(0.5) is negative, so we go right. the zero to the right of x = 0.5 is x = 1, so the bound is 0.5 to 1, in this case
if you want to do this analytically just note that the derivative of |x| is x/|x|
would you like to know why?
$|x| = \sqrt{x^2}$
knief
hence
$\frac{d}{dx} |x| = \frac{d}{dx} \sqrt{x^2} = \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2}} = \frac{x}{|x|}$
knief
knief
2x-1 from chain rule
then for it to be decreasing we require this to be < 0
$\frac{(x^2-x)(2x-1)}{|x^2-x|} < 0$
knief
denominator is always nonnegative, so for this to be less than zero we need 2x-1 < 0 and x^2-x > 0 or x^2-x < 0 and 2x-1>0
for the first the intersection of the two intervals is x<1/2 and (x<0 or x>1) hence we have x < 0 but we said we were ignoring that in your question
we get x<0 btw because x<1/2 and (x<0 or x>1) is equivalent to (x<1/2 and x<0) or (x<1/2 and x>1) the second part is the empty set since x cannot both be less than one half and greater than 1, so we just consider the first part and the intersection of x<1/2 and x<0 is just x<0
now for the second intersection we have 0<x<1 and x > 1/2 hence we just have x > 1/2
@still temple
@red nimbus did you really just 🔥 because i said positive instead of nonnegative lol
in fact
lol
the denominator must be always positive
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fresh rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the disrespect is crazyy
what
wdym
I'll look at your messages later
damn, you helped them and they hit u with that
?
lol
$\frac{d}{dx} |x^2-x| = \frac{(x^2-x)(2x-1)}{|x^2-x|}$
anjali
How you got 2x-1
this step
why
idk chain rule lol
nope
oh lol then yea this won’t help you
the channel had already been closed
you’re welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the domain and range of this function
What I usually do for the domain x > 0 and solve
And the range I get from the graph
But I can’t draw this function
domain is "what values of x is it defined on"
we know we cant sqrt negative numbers
and we know we cant do 1/0
everything else is fair game
so if we cant do 1/0,
When is $\ln(1-2x^2) = 0$
Karma
Karma
your domain is "everything else"
@deep grail
as for range, its the max and min value you can get out of this function. can you think of how we might approach that?
When is ln =0?
ln(x) = y means e^y = x
so e^0 = 1 - 2x^2
so 1 = 1 - 2x^2
so 0 = -2x^2
more simply, any log(x) = 0 when x = 1, so just set the inside = 1 whenever you see that
let's see if you can figure out the logic. start somewhere, and we'll go from there.
think about what makes the function really small, and what makes it very large.
Find the limit when x approaches infinity and negative infinity?
not quite
when x is negative infinity, the sqrt term is undefined.
these things are case-by-case, honestly
limits are a good spot to start though, the thinking is similar
Ok right
We said that the domain was R/{sqrt(1/2)}
So we get the limit there and infinity
We should have alp the values there
?
Oh I miss calculated mb
The smallest value $f(x) + g(x)$ can produce is $\min(f(x)) + \min(g(x))$.
Therefore the smallest value $\frac{1}{\ln(1-2x^2)} + \sqrt{x}$ can produce is $\min(\frac{1}{\ln(1-2x^2)}) + \min(\sqrt{x})$
Karma
i dont even know what you meant by that, where'd you get sqrt(1/2)?
Nvm😂
lol
its undefined for negatives, and for when the ln term is 0
so whats the domain?
(0,infinity)?
yup
now this for the range
I don’t get it
whats the smallest value for 1/u
If its 0 it approaches infinity but its not 0
1/0.1 is 10
1/0.01 is 100
1/0.001 is 1000
we want the minimum value
that's getting larger
well whats the minimum value?
Close to 0
yes, why?
And that gives us infinity
Because at zero its undefined