#help-33
1 messages · Page 179 of 1
$$\frac{3(-1)(x-c)}{xc(x-c)} = \frac{3(-1)}{xc}$$
Merosity
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
yeah you're welcome
One message removed from a suspended account.
Closed by @copper basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what
at x=0, y is 8.2
at x=4 y is 9
so dont do you like 0.8/4 = 0.2 rate of change
but then it says round to the nearest thousandth
@dapper snow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@dapper snow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
they're asking you to describe the curve you've been given, so plug in 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and give an answer accordingly
the curve already gives the answer but they want you to use the function here
@hallow eagle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what ques means ?
1+2+3......+k
sigma (k=1 to 20) [ sigma (i=1 to k) [ i ] ]
you're asked the sum of the 20 first integers
sigma
you were once too a sigma
i am sigma
slayla now it's layla
so using n(n+1)/2 the ans i got is not correct
off topic👾
that one is 1 + 2 + ... + n
this one you are adding a lot more things
did you use this and make n = 20?
you need to use that for the inside part
actual ans is 1540
so its sum (k(k+1)/2) from 1 to 20
i didnt get the sequence
so you know that 1 + 2 + 3 +... + k is k(k+1) / 2
yes
but why
yea
thnx
@split geode Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @split geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
allo
hello, what is your question
what... do you mean?
what is the black square? that represents a right angle, aka 90 degrees
i wqnna know if a and b are equal C :
not necessarily
in this diagram that's probably what they meant but we can't definitively say
hi am sorry to ask but where can i get help, i'm really just overthinking a small problem
@sinful thistle renegade sir
the full context^
"I" think
that theg are
equal
again, not necessarily
🤔 they look the saame and th3y xoming from the same angle
and please do not ping me
aigh sorry
how so
id they meant thwt then they wouldnt name them different variables
bro left on read
me
💀
.close
Closed by @crude fog
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
do you have any idea on how to solve this
No idea
or do you need help from the very beginning
you can substitute the denominator
4x²+1 = u
apply the same method you would apply on your pfp
.close
Closed by @stuck geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
valid
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Understanding Eulers:
I'n trying to work with Answer 1's method since my test is in 4 hours but how does the math work for when i square everything
@hushed dust Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @hushed dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @honest topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Ignore the previous screenshot, I need help with this one
Could somebody walk me thru this step by step please?
yes
This one?
This is what I have so far
I don't know where to go from here
.close
Closed by @honest topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain how they are manipulating the rhs to get the factorisation?
,rotate
@velvet tiger Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Integrals are not bad woah
I half understand what they did but i cannot follow their method for a similar question with different values for the life of me
Prwtty sure they just did backwards completing the square maybe??
@velvet tiger Has your question been resolved?
@velvet tiger Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @velvet tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is this proof?
it's a little long winded because I wasn't sure how much detail I should put in, so I decided more was better
the second paragraph feels a little bit on the less rigourous side though
if there's any logical mistakes or typos, please let me know!
Do you do such proofs in exams too?
I would put significantly less detail on an exam
just handwave a lot
this is worse than gedichtsanalyse
there's also this proof I would like verified 
that's all though
just these 2 problems
at least your proof writing is neat
I don't think you can say any open set in [0,2] is an interval
it just feels like reading a script 😭
you're right
fml
do I really need to do another double inclusion

I write my proofs in a way that I could read them and understand them without more needed
and since I'm a terrible proof reader, this is the result
actually no I don't
i think i am the problem
i dislike reading long ass stuff
I think so if you want to be extremely rigorous
wait maybe I do

okay fine
I'll go do that
how's this proof?
But it should just be a few lines 🙂
no need to delete haha
thanks :)
For 4b) one might be able to say h(x) = [f(x)+g(x)+|f(x)-g(x)|]/2
I'm still reading, but your topology knowledge is admittedly on a higher! level than mine
higher! 
that's okay, take your time
I'll go try to fix that other proof rn
yea i think icannot help on this, this time
no worries
hey... 
I probably write with more words than I need but idk
do you see any problems with this one though, snow?
yea it's too long 😭
luckily I don’t write them by hand anymore
its just like
my TAs used to have to read stuff like this with my messy handwriting
too long to follow 
in theory the proof should be quite short
prove that {(x, y) | x <= y} is closed, i.e., {(x, y) | x < y} is open
then {f(x) <= g(x)} is the preimage under (f, g)
and the fact that {(x, y) | x < y} is open should follow directly from constructing an open cover
well this should be true of any order topology
X isn’t ordered though
given an ordered set Y, the set {(x, y) | x < y} in Y x Y is open
well i feel like what you're doing is shoving all the details of the two steps i outlined into one thing
and my eyes are just falling off the page as i try to read your proof unfortunately
I see
snow can't

just like you
if snow can't nobody can
maybe riemann but we know he the laziest helper
as I said, I didn’t know how much detail I should’ve put in lol
I could just say that the closure of U is clearly [0,2] and the interior of that is clearly (0,2)
wait he said counter example and you wrote proof
I need to prove that it’s a counterexample
ah
maybe the example is more complicated than you need
why not give just one
like
I did!
i thought you rather tried to prove that it's true not false 😭
say you pick the space to be (0, 2) and U = (0, 1) \cap (1, 2)
then clearly the closure of (0, 1) \cap (1, 2) \subseteq (0, 2)
but 1 is also in the closure because any neighbourhood intersects U non-trivially
but U is already open
and thats it
oh i guess you dont need the U is open part
i thought it was Int U \ne Int U bar
wait I don't need why we're done

like you've written more than you need
because you've proved things that don't need to be proved

like this first paragraph is redundant
[0, 2] is a closed superset of U
so the closure of U must be contained in [0, 2]
by definition
and then you just need to show that 0, 1, 2 are in U for the other containment
these are just checking neighbourhoods intersect non-trivially
I did that, didn't I?
but the better thing to do is to just choose (0, 2) to be the topological space though
so you yeet everything out of existence
and just deal with 1
yeah but I put it there for completeness idk
like it's obvious, but I wanted to say it anyways
but like
at the end of the day
you probably only need to show that 1 point is in Int U closure
and not in U
so you don't need to compute the whole thing
anyway
i should be doing work 
okie dokie
thank you snow
ig the main issue I have is that
I write too much then?

probably try to be more concise and to the point
Closed by @void elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is cos(3 -sin x) wrong? The correct answer for the derivative is supposed to be f'(x) = cos(3x cos x)[(-3x sin x) + (3 cos x)]
Er rather where did I go wrong
!flip
how flip
.flip
.help
Commands:
- clopen:
.close,.reopen - consensus:
.poll - factoids:
.tag - help:
.help - version:
.version
Type .help <command name> for more info on a command.
your working out doesn't really make much sense, what technique were you trying to use?
I know im supposed to put the outside derivative multiplying the let side, which is the derivative of u times the inner function
I wrote it badly, I know du is cos[3x cos x] but i got confused after that
ok and what is the derivative of the inner function?
3 -sin x right
because cos dx is -sin
x
and the derivative of 3x is... 3
3 -sin x?
yes but that isn't the product rule
o
so I should have used the product rule and not the chain rule?
no you have to use both
oh
first the chain rule because you have a function inside a function
and then you have to use the product rule for differentiaing the stuff inside of sin
There's like different layers to the functions in this case the first layer was dealing with the composition
So chain rule came first
yeah
That product rule would be the "derivative of the inner function" part of the chain rule
so f(x) would be 3x and prime being 3
and g(x) would be cos x and prime being -sin x?
Yea you can do it that way
is there a better way ._.
Then it's an f×g situation
Nooo not necessarily xD
That's perfect
I only mean to suggest there's often many ways to frame the derivative
You could factor the 3 out
And do x*cosx
Then multiply 3 at the end
It's not necessarily better or worse
Just another way
Like dis
Yea good
So that entire thing is the "derivative of the inner function"
Finish the chain rule with that in mind
I can't simplify it or anything, like don't touch it?
Nah it's usually fine
Unless you need to do more than just find it
Most calc courses I've seen have a low threshold for simplifying
But each professor is different
Many times there's no neat way to simplify
So then I get cos[(3x)(-sin x) + (cos x)(3)] and thats... like the final answer
as long as you realise what you've shown us isn't the final answer
o
It would be
howd they get this?
forgotten a bit of the chain rule again
Cos(original inner function)×[derivative of inner]
yeah
oh
The first part always keeps the original inner function intact
The derivative you took is just multiplied to the side of that
So then finally >
Close the cos on the original g
or -3x sin x is a different way to write it..
wym
Cos(3xcosx) × [product rule]
You're missing a bracket to properly close that cos at the front
You have it
Cos[(3xcosx)
isnt it the original function times all of that other function?
yeah and I put the bracket at the end because they both need to be multiplied before cos right?
o
thats confusing
cos(original) * derivation
Yeaaa
strange
Just like that
gotcha
It's only weird now cause you didnt practice it enough
chain rule is h(t(x)) = h'(t(x)) * t'(x)
It's easy once you practice
I learned all this in the past 2 days tbh
yeah it make a lot of sense after it gets ingrained into your skull
well I didnt know trigonometry at all
so I had to learn all that
and now I kinda get differentiation and stuff now
Yea exactly once you do it more you'll think it's easy too
I got a midterm tomorrow with integrals
good practice drill is to do the 100 differentiations and 100 integrations
so im like almost there
You're doing chain rule after integration?
lol
naw im just really slow in math
im in calc 2 but i didnt know anything so I just caught up from basically beginner trig and now im up to differentiation
I think I can learn integrals before I sleep so I think I can get a good score
Eh its like a nother operation
if you can do these kind of questions in your head you should be good to go
so good luck
howd I get up to calc 2 with this knowledge whooo knows, but I hope its enough for the midterm xD
thank yous for all the help
👍
close it
.close
Closed by @misty mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it right or wrong ? please
my teacher said thats yes but think no ?
It's true
knief
a can be zero
Another way of saying it is
Sqrt(a^2) = | a |
(and the right is the standard definition of absolute value)
Exactly
-(-2) = 2
2 is the negative of the original number in the root, -2
This happened precisely because -2 < 0
yes so why it didnt do -2 ?
.
no its -2 not -(-2)
brother
Sqrt of a positive number is always positive by definition of the radical symbol
look at your definition
The radical symbol means "take the positive square root of the number"
Another way to think of that
so when she mean -a, she mean that the minus (-) is out of the parenthèses ?*
a is -2, so a<0, so -a is -(-2)
like this -(a)
okay thanks
realy
I ve exams tomorow
french teachers are bad ...
yeah but french system is ...
Use .close lol
@left geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
( talking about b ) i understand that 2 theta - 60 = 45 is one solution, i do not understand how to get the other solutions or how to determine how many there are
idk either
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
repost your question correctly next time
because you deleted it
Closed by @fiery valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
trying to understand
lim x->0 cosx = 1 (makes sense w unit circle), lim x->0 sinx is NOT = 1? lim x->0 sinx/x = 1 however?
wait that kind of makes sense bc if lim x->0 sinx = 1 then lim x->0 sinx/x = 1/0
which = 0
undefined
I'm a little confused as to why you can justify the limit of cos(x) with the unit circle but not the sin(x). Isn't sin(x) just the height? Why shouldn't it go to 0?
i honestly forgot how it works but that's why the limit is 0
yes me too
it does
I mean why do you think it should be 1?
No it isn't.
wat
sin(0) is 0
im tweaking
x is the angle
The distance on the x axis is cos(x)
so to the right would be x = 0
Yep.
Yeah, a quarter turn.
so lim x->pi/2 sinx = 1
That's correct.
Closed by @gloomy salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
How do I show that $$ \frac{a}{a-1}= 1+ \frac{1}{a-1}$$ ?
aguirre27
Right, start from the end
$$ \frac{a}{a-1}= 1+ \frac{1}{a-1}= \frac{a-1}{a-1} + \frac{1}{a-1} = \frac{a}{a-1}$$
aguirre27
Closed by @charred abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How many bit strings of length 10 containing at least 5
consecutive 0’s or at least 5 consecutive 1’s are there?
full disclosure i might not be the most qualified to answer this problem but i'll try anyway
my general strategy is to use PIE:
count number with at least 5 consecutive 0's
count number with at least 5 consecutive 1's
add them together, and subtract count where there are at least 5 consecutive 0's AND at least 5 consecutive 1's
Let's count the case with there are at least 5 consecutive 0's
At the top of my head, there are two ways to count it:
- Complementary Counting / Recursion
- Casework
What have you tried?
@tight pebble Has your question been resolved?
I've tried focusing on solely the 0's. at least 5 consecutive would be equal to exactly 5 + exactly 6 + ... + exactly 10.
for exactly 5 you could have 2(2^4) + 3(2^3) different outcomes but i dont think this is the most efficient way to calculate it
I do agree that inclusion exclusion is a good idea
I haven't tried putting the problem into code, i was hoping to get an equation to represent the problem
Yeah, recursion isn't just for code tho
Anyway recursion might be nasty
I think we can casework based on the "leftmost 0" of the chain
does that make sense?
im not sure im familiar with casework? do you mean just going through each scenario?
Yeah, like you did here
ok I think that is possible, since I got 2(2^4) + 3(2^3) for exactly 5 0's. My reasoning for this is that 2^4 is for both cases when the 0s are on the left or right edge of the string, leaving a 1 as a buffer and then the final 4 bits are 0s or 1s. 2^3 is for the 3 cases where the 0's are not in the center and need a 1 bit buffer on both ends, leaving 3 bits as 1s or 0s
If that makes sense
instead of exactly 5 + exactly 6 + ... + exactly 10, i think it might be better to casework on the where the left most digit of the consecutive zeros is
so instead we will do
00000...
100000...
_100000...
__100000...
does that make sense?
it's hard to explain what i mean
i think i understand, where _ can either be 0 or 1
yeah
so for 00000...
we can have any of the following
000001____
0000001___
00000001__
000000001_
0000000001
How many possibilities are there?
2^4+2^3+2^2+2^1+2^0?
Yep!
How about this case?
1000001___
10000001__
and so on
wait oops
the first digit must be 1
it would be 2^3+2^2+...+2^0?
so the pattern would just keep removing the highest power until the final case 0000000000 would just be 2^0
Well the next case would be
_100000___
_1000000__
_10000000_
_100000000
Each time, we are moving the 00000... one to the right
wouldnt the final case of 10 0s be missing?
you're right i'm sorry
000001____
0000001___
00000001__
000000001_
0000000001
0000000000
This should have been the first case
1000001___
10000001__
100000001_
1000000001
1000000000
this is the second case
_1000001__
_10000001_
_100000001
_100000000
this is the third case
instead of determining its length and then position,
we determine its position and then its length
i see, ty. I have to run for the night but if the chat doesnt close ill send my solution. thank you for your help, ive been stuck on this problem for a couple days!
alr before you leave
honestly now that i think about it this way might be easier
😆
all good! your way helped explain it for me
2(2^3)+3(2^2) for length 6
yeah and then
for the white ones
its symmetric
and then finally you subtract 2 for the cases where both are true
and then the overlap would just be 2: 1111100000 0000011111
yep!
thank you so much!
np!
@tight pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what can help me to select variation of parameters, reduction of order, or indeterminate coefficients to solve an ODE
@lyric laurel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lyric laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help in iv
How did you get the coordinates of C and D, from your diagram?
Anyways, you have the coordinates of A and B given to you, if you call the point C (-c, 0) and the point D (0, d), then... 
Ping 
@buoyant cave Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sorry was afk
is this correct
Lemme read through it 
Careful, while OC is 16/3, remember that the point C has negative x coordinate, so C is the point (-16/3, 0) and so your denominator is 0 - (-16/3)
oh
(also notice that CD has positive gradient from the diagram too, so you should get a positive answer)
But if you fix that, I'm happy with the gradient
+27/16
so just the signs are incorrect right
Yep the signs in certain places 
then the final eqn is just the same just pos
Yep, y = +27x/16 + 9 it is 
Have a good one 
.close
Closed by @buoyant cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Thank you in advance if someone gets it!
Hint: Remainder theorem says when a polynomial p(x) is divided by x-a, the remainder is p(a).
@sand beacon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i keep getting this question wrong 😭
so for this i tried to get the derivative then found the derivative of that
i ended up with (y+2-y-2)/x^2
for double derivattive
(y+2)/x
wait chain rule?
riemann
(you're forgetting some negatives, if you're claiming that this is dy/dx)
wait huhhhh
Do this
okay i got 2-(x dy/dx +y) for first derivative
That's equal to 0
yeahh
and then i found the derivative of that
which is [x(dy/dx)-(y+2)]/x^2
right ? 😭
and then i just plugged dy/dx back in
For the first derivative, you've claimed that $2 - \qty(x\dv{y}{x} + y) = 0$, which is correct - what is $\dv{y}{x}$ equal to from that?
@glass silo
hint: not this
OHHH
oops
i forgot to distribute 💀
okay so derivative is (y-2)/-x
yea i think i get it now
thanks 🙏
cstbittttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
@swift bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @swift bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
each little clump of atoms is a separate molecule
you are aware that this is mathematics?
He is, he just doesn't care
So why isn’t it CL12
<@&268886789983436800>
.close
Closed by @quaint elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
go to the chem server
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
we must find a 2x2 so that ker(T)=col(T)
i think there is no such T, how could elements transformed to 0 even be a basis of the column space?
but the problem makes it sound like there must be one, so i need to know if im just being silly
it is definitely possible
Closed by @fresh oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{ \sqrt{cos(x)}}{1+cos^{2}(x) }dx$
Dootud
scope highschool math, currently i have about not a lot (zero) ideas where to go with this
take cosx as t squared.
differentiate and then resubstitute
change limits ofcourse.
try the ones ive mentioned if u got no clue come over to dms.
what happened.
you yield $-\int_{0}^{1} \frac{2t^{2}}{(1+t^{2})(\sqrt{1-t^{6}})}dt$
Dootud
well, my bad.
no worries
kings rule?
so far ive tried:
application of symmetry for definite integrals (didnt work)
subs for u^{2} = cosx
u=-x
ok but what if were going to assume cosx is some u
by parts (100% a no)
no differentiation of course
just letting it
and then letting u as some z squared
this is no different to t^2 = cosx sub that was suggested earlier
i dont think subs like this will work for this integral
try diving by cos square x
whats the motivation behind that though
ill try and lyk
aight
im not sure bout this one
were just letting
nvm
we still have to replace dx
oh wow
i was right
divide by cos squared x
@naive stump
what does that do to the integrla tho
wait no nvm.
it wont change the limits.
just division
yeah as in like
whats the goal after that
just gonna ping helpers as well
<@&286206848099549185>
u can if it has been 15 mins
$\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{ \sqrt{cos(x)}}{1+cos^{2}(x) }dx$
(reposted for convenience)
Dootud
is this another trig sub
no clue.
so ugly
i think ive kinda got it.
divide by cos squared x and then the denomiator would be sec squared x + 1 which is 2+ tan squared x
tan pie / 2 is ugly
your numeratour is sitll (secx)^{3/2}
did u not divide by cos^2{(x)
cosx/cos power 4x is sec cube x
no ur correct but u do get 1/(cos^3x)^1/2
even then
which is (secx)^3/2
i got the value inside the root.
all good
so split it
sec^2x
and then sec^[-1/2]. x
oh nvm
@naive stump
split it as under root sec squared x and under root sec x
works right?
then divide and multiply by under root secx u shud end up taking another variable
but like where are u going with this
jus let me cook
aight
if its wrong its wrong i mean
u ride by the ship u die by it
anyway.
do that rn.
u shud end up here.
assume tanx as t
root secx would be root 1 + tan squared x
tiny error.
uh u get root sec ^2 x into root sec^x into root sec^x
so the numerator would be sec^2x
oh nvm solved it
my sub ended up being let $cosx = tan(\frac{u}{2})$
Dootud
i appreciated the help
ok
ok.
.close
Closed by @naive stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
u gotta use partial at the end by my method
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone recommend me some good material to learn episilon - delta limits and stuff?
im new to those and i dont understand anything :c
Probably something on YouTube
just do example problems until you get stuck
Closed by @raven sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nw
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
resuming my last question , do u have any good epsilon - delta questions?
tho let them be easy ish , so i can do them
what kind?
like i said
blackpenredpen
he has like 15 videos on the topic
reimann said it would be best if i solved them
like starter type questions , new to them
you can always pause the videos and try for yourself
but like limits or something else?
what are the use for epsilon delta limits?
is it just to proof the limit we found is correct or not?
formal proofs of limits, yes
ye , epsilon delta proof for limits
uhh no not really
then what are they used for?
will they be useful in future calculus?
if that means analysis then sure
different things?
Functional analysis is a branch of mathematical analysis, the core of which is formed by the study of vector spaces endowed with some kind of limit-related structure (for example, inner product, norm, or topology) and the linear functions defined on these spaces and suitably respecting these structures. The historical roots of functional analysi...
go read
and go find problems
don't ask for them here
ok
nobody knows what you know or don't know
(i havent studied those , im just in calc 1 :c)
tho ty for the help , ill research furture
.close
Closed by @raven sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
hi you
i believe the third time today
no, second?
second only?
then it was yesterday also
thats a bit straight forward
i thought of putting it all to ^3
which will give directly
27 / 3
yea
how did u get cbrt 9
is that a 9
1^9/ 32 ?
i guess not
or
just see that
ren
then simply negate the exp
how tho
ren
no...
..
negative exponent
well yeah that's derived via quotient
but the one above that should be the first thing you think to apply
actually just use this from now
lmk if you need any assistance tho
mhm
now for this one
we just multiply by msqrtm + n sqrt n
we get 2 formulas
one up one down
(m sqrtm + n sqrt n) ^ 2 / (msqrtm)^2 - (n sqrt n)^2
(m^3 + 2mnsqrt(mn)+n^3 ) / (m^3 - n^3)
uhhhhh
yeah checks out
this one is to calculate it
same shit ig
firsto ne we use sqrt 2 + 2
we get them like at the last one
the next one same thing
for the last one just sqrt 2
mhm
yeah
second one is 3 - 2 sqrt 2
last one 2 + 3 sqrt 2
wym
simplify -3 - 2 sqrt 2 + 3 - 2 sqrt 2 - (2 + 3 sqrt 2)
-2 + sqrt 2
@queen prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @queen prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
mb i went to take a shower
yea thx a lot
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so sirry
Ok so
487 kj to J right
would be 4.87x10^5J/mol photons
but how do i find wavelength if im not given frequency (V)
.
what are the two equations that you do know
well you dont have v explicitly, but you can write v in terms of something else
i need to think harder...
Interconnect the given formulas whenever possible
use the outer two
v can be something else?
isolate v then plug into the other equation
so E=?
but you can still solve for it if you want lol




