#help-33
1 messages · Page 177 of 1
OK
That sounds frustrating. So, I have two questions:
- What has your overall experience with this math class been like?
- Would you like to explain (briefly) why I brought up the focus on vectors having directions, but not lines?
overall my experience in the class is fine
I understood nothing from the first 4 modules on the test until like the night before looking at the steps for solving the problems
examples I mean
and then applied those steps to the test
and did very well despite not understanding much theory
I'm kind of behind actually
I didnt learn this module in lecture because I was absent
did very well despite not understanding much theory
Congrats!
I'm kind of behind actually
That can be challenging. Math is very cumulative.
I didnt learn this module in lecture because I was absent
I'm sorry to hear
basically my goal right now is to just learn the steps in solving these problems on this homework assignment
I also have a quiz on it tomorrow
Sounds good
At some point you might want to understand the theory and catch up. If there's something from the past you've not understood, it will likely catch up with you.
So, let's go through this a bit faster OK?
yeah I'd definitely like to learn the theory but at the moment Im a bit crunched on time
sounds good to me
But please dive in deeper later
will do
The one on the right is the correct one
Vector V is the same vector in both. It has a single direction and length
The projection is supposed to make a right angle with the line.
The line goes on forever
gotcha thats really simple
Cool
weird that i missed that
All g.
Only the direction of the vector matters
right
sounds good
It'll be different than your work, but we'll go over the concept quickly
sure
OK.
Picture 1: we have two vectors C and D
2: We make D negative (literally reverse its direction)
- We can move -D. -D=-D regardless of where it is.
- C-D = C + (-D)
- We can move the vector C-D around too
gotcha
That should help w question 2, right?
yes it adds context
Actually, can you post the questions again?
yes lol
so its c - the projkc
but isnt it already in both directions because its a line?
ProjKC is not a line. K is. ProjKC is a vector that's the shadow of C on the (infinite) line K
Hold on. More drawings incoming
gotcha
Yes. You could, but look at picture 5. Shortcut for vector subtraction
C-D = from tip of D to tip of C
right
so we just create a parallel k at the tip of c going in the inverse direction?
so just inverse the green line at the tip of c?
If you mean what I think you mean, then yes
so how do we use that to solve the problem?
is it just an explaination or is there math to solve?
right
New drawing incoming
gotcha
OK. If we project C onto D, we get proj_dC
I just moved it down a little so it's not on top of D
Good?
gotcha
Note that D is on a line (this is called a span, but you don't have to know that)
We can measure the length of this projection
the dot product of c and d is the length of the projection times the length of d
what is the dot product
in your question it says (c-proj) * [1, 2]
gotcha thats dot prod form?
that's (c-proj) dot [1, 2]
yes
it's a way of multiplying vectors that results in a scalar
gotcha
so thats the length?
Not quite. Technically, it's the product of the length of the projection with the length of the other vector
I see
Hold on
sure]
If you project a vector onto itself, it's the perfect noon shadow. You get the vector back
So, proj_cC = C
then the length of that projection times the length of c is
the length of C * the length of C
But that's the dot product of C with C!
In general dot product is a measure of how aligned vectors are and their lengths
Good video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyGKycYT2v0&list=PLZHQObOWTQDPD3MizzM2xVFitgF8hE_ab&index=9
Why the formula for dot products matches their geometric intuition.
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos.
Home page: https://www.3blue1brown.com/
Dot products are a nice geometric tool for understanding projection. But now that we know about lin...
OK
so how do I do the subtraction
right but what are the measurements
It doesn't matter
when I look on chegg it has weird calculations and stuff
They're asking you to draw it
it says "What should it be"
bit of a vague question lol
like
theoretically? mathematically?
Hold on. Lemme review this
sure
the chegg?
No. Sorry it's all right. They're good. I misread the question
oh ok
OK. That makes sense
gotcha
C = (1,3), right?
yes
OK. Yeah. The projection of c onto K is 7/5K, not 7/5C. They are wrong
There'a a formula for the vector projection. It would be (c dot k)/(k dot k) all times k
But it's not necessary
The question asks you about c - projkc, right?
That's the orthogonal projection
Yeah. Don't worry about measurements. I think I did read it correctly.
Check this out. This should be the last drawing then we'll review
ok
no shadow?
Note that the projection of purple vector onto the blue (or any vector along blue)
Yes. Has no shadow
That should be all you need
Do you have a text book?
I understood like the concept of the inversion of projkc since its negative
but thats all
sure
I'm not sure if this works in this room
yeah its a text room only i think
OK. You get that a projection will be positive if the two vectors point the same way?
And negative if they point in opposite ways
yes
What's between positive and negative? 0
So if they are perpendicular, the projection is 0
and no shadow
Exactly
The book is trying to get you to derive the orthogonal projection
how do i derive it?
OK. A few notes. Your first drawing was (almost) perfect:
That dark arrow under C is the projection of C onto K
(almost)
But the angle is a little wide. projc should be longer so that the shadow makes a right triangle
it just needles to be straight yeah
right
yep
so c - projc goes from the tip of projc to the tip of c
it's the right angle of that triangle
does that make sense?
(we're just doing the subtraction)
So to correct this drawing.
- Make it a bit bigger to give yourself more space.
- That black arrow is (almost perfect), just make it have a right angle
(not like the one on the left)
Show me that much, even a rough sketch and you'll be well on your way
This is the (almost) correct drawing:
Almost!
It looks like that arrow is going from C. We want it to go to C
Unless I'm seeing it incorrectly
But still, that's great
I thought it comes off the k line in the direction 1,3?
so I did 1,3 on 1,0 where k starts
No. I'm not talking about C
oh
That's perfect
Please add labels too!
It might help to move the label of K away since the line should be looooong
ok just did
OK. Nice!
now what
yes
Turquoise is?
c?
K
projkc
projcc?
Nope
-projkc?
oh ok so its c-d
Well in our case, we don't have d
so what do we call it?
still c-d even though we dont have a d?
c-projkc
Exactly!
it's ok. take a break after this and congratulate yourself, you're literally trying to learn vector addition, subtraction, scalar multiplication, dot products, parameterized lines and projections in one night.
Last part is: what's the shadow of c-projkc on the line containing (1,2)?
ahhh ok so the answer is to just say that it is a vector that casts no shadow?
If you want. Your teacher might have a different metaphor or explanation. They might prefer saying that the vectors are perpendicular so the dot product is 0. Or that cos(pi/2) = 0. But the gist is the same
Once you establish that, your last question is asking you to solve an equation set to zero.
Let the first parts sink in, take a break, and you should be able to get the last one.
Nice. Go chill for a bit, then review and try the last problem.
Well, we've reviews a lot of concepts:
- What is a vector in space?
- Subtraction: C-D is the vector from the tip of D to the tip of C
- Vector projection: The shadow of one vector onto the line containing another (line connecting should be perpendicular)
- Dot product: the length of the vector projection of C onto D times the length of D. Also a number that relates how much two vectors point in the same direction (positive means similar, negative means opposite, zero means perpendicular)
- Orthogonal projection (orthogonal also means perpendicular)
yeah I do feel like im studying at the same time
which is good for the quiz tomorrow\
Im ready for the next one when you are
I gotta drop soon. But please give your mind a rest. A short break will do you good
oh gotcha how long you have left?
Just a few minutes
oh ok
Well I appreciate the help, definitely one of the more dedicated sessions I've had on here
wayyy better than the net tutors as well
No problem!
Thanks
Take care! Also, if you missed a whole module, you might want to ask your teacher for more time to catch up. And they might say "no" in which case, you might want go above their head
Ciao!
You too thank you
@dreamy lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Looking for some help with this question, my steps to get here were:
it is a bit hard to read your handwriting from a small image but here is what i would do
rewrite it as
x dy/dx - y = 8xlnx
which turns into
dy/dx - y/x = 8lnx
turning into
d/dx (ylnx) = 8lnx
then integrate both sides iwth respect to x
ylnx = 8(xlnx -x), i did integration of lnx by inspection because it is a common integral to do but u can do it by parts just to make sure
so therefore ylnx = 8xlnx -8x + c
your integrating factor should be $e^{\int -1/x \ dx}$
higher's secret brother
oh i also made that mistake
oh ok you got that
yea I could try to take a better image but after integration my rho(x) is e^-lnx which I said simplified to 1/x
I did xy` = y + 8xlnx
y' = y/x + 8xlnx
y' - y/x = 8xlnx
rho(x) = e^integral(-1/x) = e^-lnx = 1/x
y/x = 8*intregral(lnx) + c
y/x = 8xlnx - x + c
y = 8x^2 lnx - x^2 + cx
Initial condition is y(1) = 8 so
8 = 8ln(1) - 1 + c
8 = -1 +c
c = 9
y = 8x^2 lnx - x^2 + 9x
@humble lichen Has your question been resolved?
Hmm, I realized that I should have distributed the 8, corrected it, and it's still wrong 🫠
.close
Closed by @humble lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
4x + 10 = -26
i dont how to algebra at all i started a month late
subtract 10 in both LHS and RHS
what does that mean
isolating variables and numbers
so you subtract 10 from both sides
4x +10 -10 = -26 -10
oh
4x = -36
-4?
i keep forgetting negatives 😭
np
.close
Closed by @stiff yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im so confused how am i supposed to get exact points or zeros from this
you kind of can't, so what i would do is assume the roots are integers and use visual inspection to find them in accordance with the fact that you know the locations of two points with x-coordinates 0 and 2
@frail violet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frail violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
difference between
- $Mat_{m \cross n} (\mathbb{F})$
and - $\mathbb{F} ^ {m \cross n}$
is nonexistent?
the first one is very false
Ayanokoji (ALWAYS PING ME)
ok now its the same
so just notation?
yes
Closed by @hazy dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
!15mins
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
is (x-a) multiplied with (x-b)(x-c)?
hint a^3+b^3+c^3-3abc=0,iff a+b+c=0
||a+b+c=3x ||
||(a-x)+(b-x)+(c-x)=0||
do you know how subraction works?
yeah so i can write 3x=x+x+x right
ok
ok
now use this
the answer is zero
yes
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys, how to solve 4cos^2 x = 1? I’m new to this topic
isolate cos^2(x) first
What is isolate? Is it making cos^2(x) = 1/4?
yep
now notice that cos(x) is either +1/2 or -1/2
Ohhh we can move the squares?
Yess
after that all you need to do is solve cos(x) = 1/2 and cos(x) = -1/2
(important values of trig circle can help)
Ohhhh
Okayyy thank you so much
Thank youuu so much
@near elbow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In part(c) it says to find tanACB which should be -8/15, but the answer is 15/8?
The answer
The answer in the textbook is correct, Check the steps carefully again.
@snow plank Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why am I getting two different answers?
I put the answer from my physical calculator first and got it right, but when I used the calculator on my phone I got 8/3 instead of 1/24
your phone is being dumb
it did multiply instead of divide
Closed by @floral tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if $W_1$ and $W_2$ are vector subspaces of $V$ show that $W_1+W_2$ is a vector subspace of $V$
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
I'm having trouble proving closure under addition
like $v_1 \in W_1$ and $v_2\in W_2$ from that how do I conclude that $v_1+v_2 \in W_1 + W_2$
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
by definition of what W_1+W_2 means
but just considering v_i in W_i is not enough to show closure
yeah, $v_1 \in W_1 + W_2$ too
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
try to find au + v in W_1 + W_2
ie:
Let u be element of (W_1 + W_2), then scalar multiplication au is still element of W_1 + W_2
Then there exists u1 in W_1 and u2 in W_2 s.t. u1+u2 = au
then do the same for v where v1 element of W_1 and v2 element of W_2
since subspaces are closed under addition, then we know au1 + v1 element of W_1, au2 + v2 element of W_2, then au1 + v1 + au2 + v2 = a(u1+u2) + (v1+v2) = au + v is element of W_1+W_2
im not sure if what i said is rigorous because my textbook im studiyng off didnt come with written solution for exercises
i did a similar exercise from a few weeks ago
Thanks!
you dont have to bring any closure under scalar multiplication in here
I was thinking of something along the lines , by definition the sum of two subspaces is the set of the linear cobination of every vector in W_1 with every vector in W_2
So as of now in our course,we're only dealing with $R^n$
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
what you want to say is that if x is in W_1, then x=(x_1,...,x_n) for some x_i in R
so $W_1+W_2 = { (x_1+y_2 , x_2+y_2 \dots , x_n+y_n \ | x_i, y_i \in \ R}$
which is really just W_1 subset R^n rephrased
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
so $v_1+v_2 \in W_1+W_2$
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
Atleast for $R^n$ vector spaces
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
you have shown that R^n + R^n = R^n
how come, depending on the subspaces, some of $y_i$ for instance, can always be zero
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
your notation doesnt reflect that at all
actually reminds me i skipped 0 vector
How do I make my notation reflect that?
you basically just dont
restricting yourself to R^n doesnt help here
it makes you try things which lead you down wrong paths
also denascite, if u dont mind writing a more rigorous proof if u have spare time that would be appreciated as well, im self learning off textbooks because sitll in highschool so i dont really have a grasp of whats considered sufficient
there aren't solutions to most of the exercise questions either with the textbook
open your own channel
i think i wll just follow the conversation in this channel
sry for botheirng above, that was not appropirate in hindsight
I mean I can help you, I would just prefer it if you opened your own channel
you will have different questions than wai
better to separate it
If this question comes in the exam, I will HAVE to restrict myself ot R^n as we haven't done arbitrary vector spaces in class
the point is the following: thinking that all vectors have to look like x=(x1,..,xn) and trying to work with that representation will not help
at least not in the way you tried
it is very much enough to just leave the vector called x and work with only that
x can still be in R^n
okay, sure
$x \in W_1, y \in W_2$, by definition $X+W$ contains $x+y$ thus $x+y \in W_1+W_2$
ok, but to show that W_1+W_2 is closed under addition you need to take x,y in W_1+W_2 and show that x+y is in W_1+W_2
I just have
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
no you didnt
But this shows $x+y \in W_1+W_2$, right
Veni, vidi, perii is not f(wai)
but x isnt a general element of W_1+W_2
x+0 does , so it does
x is a very special element of W_1+W_2 is what I meant
it is an element of W_1+W_2, sure
but not every element of W_1+W_2 looks like that
So what am I missing
take an arbitrary element from W_1+W_2
not one that is already in W_1
similarly for y
and then show x+y is in W_1+W_2
Closed by @novel juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
u should either stick to your previous channel or close it btw
@gilded ember Has your question been resolved?
@gilded ember Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys im stuck
very neat work btw
you came so far
dont let that quadratic make you give up
Alrighty
Imma try quadratic formula
😭😭😭
@near elbow Has your question been resolved?
Guys i think im doing it wrong

(seems you got the numerical value right actually
)
Oh, actually
here too
seems like for the value of x, you used the wrong one, but the numerical line above it is fine 
Yesss i got the correct answer alreadyy
Thank you soso much!!
Thank youuu
Well done 
Hii
I have another question 
Is sin^2(x)/cos^2(x) = tan^2(x)?
Since tan x = sin x/ cos x 😀
Okayyy thankyouuuu
Gonna close this channel
Thanku sm everyone!!
.close
Closed by @near elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
The dino didn't go extinct after
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ohh alright tysm!

@chrome coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does one solve this? No matter how if i do the determinant the ordinary way or do gauss elimination before getting the determinant do i get an expression i can solve? Any tips/solutions? 🙂
just compute these two dets, whatever way you want to
then you'll get two polynomials on both sides
like this i get using the ordinary method
like how does one solve that? you cant move stuff between the left and righthand as that might break the inequality right?
you completely can
as long you just do additions or substractions it doesn't break the inequality in any way
really?
I can get to this top step then but how does one get to the factorization below?
How do i know what the factors will look like?
or is there a better way to solve it
than factoring it
yea I tried finding a proof of that online, but I found nothing interesting :/
there's the rational root theorem that can help you factor
Thx for looking 🙂
ok will look that up
@flat bear Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flat bear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone knows how to do this? Can you show me the ways pls?
<@&286206848099549185>
For the first one A will be 17
@unreal fern Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Some help on this would be appreciated
@queen swan Has your question been resolved?
did you try to draw it out?
Yes I just don’t understand bearings in general
oh i see
for bearings, it's always start from 0° as the North, and the angle will become larger and larger going clockwise, until i reaches back the North
can you show it here?
@queen swan Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
periodic table is needeD?
They said
wait atomic number
Titanium
Closed by @humble river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone check what I am doing wrong?
Closed by @fossil badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question 1:
How to find the coordinates of the circumcentre? Coordinates of vertices are given.
Question 2: How to find the circumradius? Length of sides are given.
Question 3: How to find the coordinates of the orthocenter? Again, the coordinates of the vertices are given.
yah
and the condition for perpendicularity is m1*m2 = -1
both are slopes
say AB is perp. to CD
find the slopes
we have m1 (slope of AB) and you have to find m2(slope of CD)
once you get slope find the equation of line (CD)
Repeat this process for AC perp. to BF
you will get two equations of line
Solve those two equations of line in terms of x and y to get the coordinate of orthocentre
Circumcenter is easy to find. Circumcenter is equidistant to all the three vertices of a triangle
you can use OA = OB = OC
distance formula
you can find just two for the coordinates
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a
treat the 7 pieces of card as separate things first, how many ways can you pick 4 cards out of those?
7C4
yes
btw order doesnt matter in part a
yup
like
we already said each piece of card is a separate unique piece
(at least we treat it that way)
wdym each pice of card?
ok
we can call them cards instead of pieces of card
you have 7 different cards
so if you tell me you got the letters M I N U
does that tell me which cards you picked exactly?
oh right
so each M isn the same
i thought what whole point of the q was that we remove any choicse like MMII
also i think 7C4 is wrong
why?
cause that doesnt account for repetitions?
so 2 Ms are not the same?
picking cards 1 2 3 4
is not the same as picking cards 2 3 4 5
even though you get the letters MINI for both
we treat each card as a unique card
so thats 3 choices for an M, 2 choice for I and 1 for N and 1 for U
3 * 2 * 1 * 1
= 6
so we get 6/35
answer meant to be 1/11 tho
its written at the bottom
the first number on the bottom right
wait
yeah so like 7C4 double counts, cause choosing an M, not matter what M should just be 1
i think?
but that doesn't really make sense
thank you very much @grand radish
because each letter configuration has a different probability
no but like
its shoudnt be that bad
wdym exercise correction
I understand how one can think 1/11 is the answer
how
out of the 11 possible "4-letter configurations"
only one has each letter different
M I N U
so you would think the answer is 1/11
me neither
I'm trying to explain how one MIGHT come to the conclusion
so 7 C 4 is just saying choose any 4 letters from the 7 right
I'm not saying said conclusion is correct
choose any 4 cards from the 7
yep
right so 7 C 4 accounts for M1 M2 I1 I 2 and M2 M3 I1 I2
rghjt?
but we conisder the Ms to be the same
so thats a double count?
7 C4 thinks they are all different
not in our possibility space
but in really they are not
like the EFFECT will be the same
wdym
but if you number the cards 1 to 7
think about this:
two dice are rolled
fair dice
we wanna know the probability the sum is 7
right
even though
there are 11 possible sums
2 to 12
it doesn't mean
the probability you roll sum 7
is 1/11
well
even though M I N U is one of 11 possible letter configurations
uhuh
there are actually 6 instances where you get M I N U
M1 I1 N U
M2 I1 N U
M3 I1 N U
etc...
nooooo
so all those 6 instances are teh same
u just need M I N U
it's like you number them
think smaller example
all that matters are the letters
seperate doesnt mean didfferent
what's the probability of picking an M?
2/3
yeah u have 3 things altogether
ok ok no
how many ways can u arragen them
if all Ms are the same
thats all its asking
just cause they are the same doesnt mean they are one thing
u just put that number over the total
exactly
so
What class is this?
M I N U is one thing
it is EXACTLY like that
the cards arent numbers
Is this statistics?
do you wanna go back to the previous example?
perms and coms
and we pick 2 distinct cards
why the probability of picking an M is 2/3 and not 1/2
thats a smaller version of the quetsion
u get I M
theres only 1 way
assuming order doesnt matetr
If u have a clone
so the probability of picking M would be 1/2?
are u two teh same ppl or different
no in ur case its 2/3
how is it 1/2
why though?
And I'm asking how is THE PROBABILITY 1/11 in your original problem
probability its how many ways can u get what yu want/ total choices
im assuming there are 11 different ways to pick 4 cards out of 7
in total
M I N U is one
I I M N or U
BUT
is every letter combination with the same probability?
M M M I or U or N
let me give you an example here
no these are sepcific cases
of ways tottal ways to arrange
yes
so you agree
that this doesn't mean each way to arrange has the same probability
no bro ur misundertanding the probability part
its just ways to get different/total ways
ur thinking about th eprobabiilty too much
no.
(number of ways that work)/(total number of ways) only works when each way has the same probability of happening
please listen
o go on
for a quick moment
what 1/11 IS, is the number of letter choices that give different letters (only MINU), divided by the total amount of letter choices
that I agree
what I DON'T AGREE on
is that 1/11 is the PROBABILITY
of getting different letters
just in words, how do u suggest we find the probability
whats like ur oevrall plan
if you want to get the probability
you need to find a way to describe the problem
so that each outcome has the same chance of happening
this way, the formula
"(number of ways that work)/(total number of ways)"
WILL give you the probability
and guess what
we get this
thats why for the cases we set some letter in stone
and only look at the probabilty of 1 letter
which all haev equal chance
ok but do you agree that in real life
the probability will not be "setting letters in stone"
no thats how we think about it to solve the problem
most of maths hs thinking "not nreal life"
what I'm telling you is that your exercise is wrong
at least I'm 99% sure about it
now take what you will
im telling u taht there there is only on way to get M I N U
should we get third part
i just wanetd to understand why 7C4 was wrong 
I'm telling you 7C4 isn't wrong...
I'm telling you the exercise is wrong
1/11 is wrong
yeah it's wrong
do u agree that thats all the possible cases we can get
we can get all differnet
2 Is
2 Ms
3 Ms
okokok listen
or 2Ms and 2Is
remember the 2 dice rolls problem
wanting to find probability of the sum being 7
even though there are 11 cases for the sum
yeah tehre are differnet distinct sums
doesn't mean the probability is 1/11
for the two die problem u dont look at sum u want/a ll possibble sums
u dont look at sums
look. I don't know why you're fixated on saying your solution is correct. I'm telling you that what they computed is NOT the probability
u look at outcomes
no its is correct
but i want to know why 7C4 is wrong
it's not. It's not a probability
how is not a probability
ok
let's go past this and just go general
probability means
if I repeat the experiment a near infinite amount of times
what's the proportion, on average, of the times it did work the way I wanted
right
yh
so If I'm asking what's the probability the sum is 7 on two dice rolls
I'm asking
If I repeat my two dice rolls infinitely
how many times on average will the sum be 7
no. that's not the same thing
go on
ok, imagine something else
There are two events that could happen:
- either nothing happens
- or a plane crashes into my house
there are two cases here
yh
Does that mean that if I repeat the experiment an infinite amount of times
that half of those times a plane is gonna crash into my house?
depends on the probability of plane crashign
exactly
okok so follow me for a sec
just because there is 1 case where a plane crashes into my house
and there are 2 cases in total
doesn't mean the probability a plane crashes into my house is 1/2
yes
ok
so, do you understand
that just because there are k cases that work in my favour
and there are n cases in total
doesn't mean the probability that it works in my favour is k/n
it depends on the probability of each case right?
yeah
ok
so
just because there is one case where all letters are different (M I N U)
and there are 11 cases in total
doesn't mean the probability that all letters are different is 1/11
it depends on the probability of each case
is that no the theoretical probaility
so just one last thing to recap
we didnt do the experiemtn
it's not even the theoretical probability
either it's the probability or it isn't
what your solution computed
I will agree that 1/11 is (cases that work)/(total number of cases)
but this is NOT a probability
is that not he definiton of aprobaility
on average
no
I'm telling you
if you do the experiment as stated
meaning pick 4 letters at random out of your 7 letter bag
yes
and you repeat the process an infinite number of times
I guarantee you
the number of times you get M I NU
is not gonna be 1/11
this the def right
this is the "definition" that applies everytime
I agree with rafilou btw.
You have 3*2*1*1 combinations of cards to draw that give MINU, in 4! Different orders. That divided by the total number of arrangements you could draw (7*6*5*4) is 6/35
so why is the solutio wrong
are you asking why the reasoning is wrong or are you asking "how could my teacher ever ever be wrong"?
