#help-33
1 messages · Page 169 of 1
2k/n² -> 0
Ohh a IIT aspirant , eh?
not like i have a choice
,rcw
just cause you dont understand,doesnt make it wrong
💀 pooki
yea i get what dx is but technically it should bee dx = (n-1)/n
why💀
I'm also one
because delta X = (b-a)/n
thats not small bro
🐥
so you used anything that is small lmao
did bro just say dx and delta are same
no bro it has to be infinitecimally small
thats the point of dx
why didnt you then take 1/n³
or 1/n²
cause you need x also whats x then
no i didnt but you said you applied the limit definition of integral
yes
,, \lim_{n \to \infty} \Delta x = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{b-a}{n} = \dd x
bacc
Bro don't argue, I don't think it's his fault
oh i am not arguing i am just trying to understnad
maybe i am missing out something
i dont think it's coincidence she got 1/3
Idk maybe it is
.>
If we integrate from 1 to n then dx would be here 1
i will just wait
I just saw it LMAO
😅
I'mma try the limit in a nice way
oh
no its not
Maybe.
,, \frac{\frac{1}{n} \left ( \frac{k^2}{n^2}+\frac{2k}{n^2} \right )}{1+\frac{k^2}{n^3}}
bacc
thats what you meant with equal powers
ykw sure i just guessed it
yup
(k/n)²
yup
can be substituted with u = k/n
yup
,rcw
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
no bro theres a reason
you remind me of my old friend
@coral cloak
two JEE fighters ⚔️
I forgot @supple hazel
that's my indian gang
I get it
pookie i get it
i saw what you did
i was just confused about your algebra
i notice how very fast thinking yall are
this should be published
i had such a good meal
you wont recover
and i came back with looking at integrals
if you see what happened
that aint for the weak
go sleep bro
thats good
if everyone had 1/3 of your brain we would be at mars
conquering the universe
fr
im not following your writing
ok i hope you understood but i have to go study more cause i have no choice
gogogog
wow
i just was confused about the beginning but i got it
ill re write it
i could see

hell yeah
now there is this Indian theorem to ignore all non-equal terms
what
and you can factor 1/n

it's very small so consider it as a differential conveniently
tbh it's as good as Rishabh's approach
💀 The Fundamental Theorem of India.
with the k²/n³
yea
am i wrong
inf/inf 💀
this is the neatest i can write
😭
yes
wasnt you last time asking me something about derivatives
huh i did?
you said somethign like does it work or i dont think it works like that
where did inf/inf and 0 /inf came from
WHY IS THERE AN INTEGRAL THERE
??????????????????????????
it was about a limit where I suggested to use the definition of derivative
scroll up i cant doit again
it's very grenzwertig
i dont remember but i probably did
but basically substitute x = k/n
i haveto go do organic chem hahahahahah illl cry
bye
who is this girl
is she einstein
??????????
then you get bounds n/n and 1/n which is like 0 if n goes to inf
fr bro
no
im generally curious how much you thought about this problem
but she prob knows what she done
like how do you get to this level
you dont
into factoring 1/n randomly
well if you know such theorem exists it becomes intuitive
indian coaching institutes,i study like 12 hours a day
i use this discord as a break
are you indian
so little?
???????
yeah
u are the math demon
what is pre university math
we need indian math battles here
?
before university
+1
bro there are kids better than me in my class
average indian reply if they get complimented
im like rank #5 in my class
there is no way
sorry i cannot believe that
i cant
no im not joking
some people achieve this playing fortnite solo
that's like every reply i got from indian friends i have I complimented on their math
im #2 in my class at maths
but i fw gang frfr
there is this kid who has straight A+
i mean youre doing better than the american highschoolers they dont even learn this shit
there is a spectrum on math skills to say the least
you are in school right
my professor haven't even taught us limits or matrices
i just learn them on my own
damn
i mean i was forced to learn them,but they are easy so idc
yeah i have been self learning for ab 2.5 years
why you dont care
good job
i can tell you care the most
fr
i mean even if i dont want to i am good at it so its ok
its only cause its chem homework i just dont want to
have you tried to solve milenium problems
whats that
OH NO
guys dont tell her
PLS
dont
i do pathfinder and blackbook
just dont tell her
idk what mellenium is
you get much money
ooh noice
mathematical problems that have been unsolved for over thousand years or some
theres no way i could do that
YEA
there IS
im not that smart
ty deer
entrances
i wish i had the ability to torture myself 12 hours
i dont i have adhd once my meds run out im over
now you also take meds
me too
thats where i cross the line
and if i forget to take it then also over
ah now i understood
you do methmatics
bro jkjk
fr
i am the worst in my class i just cant remember
you dont have to
if you try to remember IN CHEMISTRY you will never be good
bro what do you even have in your sylabus
i dont remember even 10% of the things my teacher taught me
but i can do any exercise anytime
we have over 40 chapters in chem and i need to know everything
chill
i also have same
exeptions mechanisms etcetc
yes
mechanisms are the best
really cute things
ill give you a question ill see if you know
points at TNT mechanism
go ahead
no wait
nah u gotta chill
i will give you a easier one
i dont know if i can understand chemistry in other language
its just so weird
i learn it in my natal language(hint: its not english)
the names of the elements are same in every language
not really
ph is benzene substituent
i is iodine
c is carbon
naoh is sodium hydroxide
o is oxygen
there you go
now can you understand?
yeah
D
i think
im not sure
i havent done chem in like 1 year
bcz summer break
what is that *
i never seen that in my entire life
i did it hehehehhehe
its haloform test
what is halofoorm test
i have no idea what heat does tho i just eliminated options
is it D
?
noh
its c
ok im actually going now
bye
see ya
.close
Closed by @scarlet folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys does someone knbow
why sometimes without adj(A)
swear i saw without the adjunct matrix
did i see wrong?
or this is formula for non 2x2 matrices?
thats for all invertible matrices
hmmm
oh w8 adj(A) would then have to be " matrix of algebraic cofactors" not the adjunct?
denoted as A* or C
thats included in the adjunct

@stark field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my professor punking me
is it just false because the initial point p on line L is not within hte half plane
ik its reversed, can i just say the contrapositive is true or is that wrong
@crude valve Has your question been resolved?
@crude valve Has your question been resolved?
is what false?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone got advice with this
just not really sure how I should show that it repsresents a circle
what relationships do you know with sin(theta) and cos(theta)
yeah exactly
is there any way you can use that in this context
yeah see what happens
sounds good, will try that and check back
I think I am getting it but let me work it out fully before I say its solved
This look right?
yep
perfect, I'll leave this open while I try 50 but if I get then ill mark it solved
thank you
yeah seems all good, thank you so much and have a nice day
.close
Closed by @terse brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what would be the most precise definition for f(x) = |x-1| + |x-2|?
or
They're both equal numerically, but the first one seems weird to me
formally
"se" is translated as "if"
Neither one is more precise, they're exactly the same
Are you referring to the < or <= signs?
Yes
Either one is fine, in both cases f(1)=1
I guess. But there isn't really any reason to prefer one over the other
Neither one is more typical than the other
That can be personal bias, but I've seen more resolutions using this structure
|x| =
x, if x >= 0
-x, if x < 0
I only needed to show that f(x) = |x-1| + |x-2| equals this
But I've reached that first instead
Took me alot of time to realize that they're both the same
What exactly is the prompt? Just to express |x-1| + |x-2| as a piecewise function?
or did they tell you specifically to prove that it is equal to this exact function
express f(x) as
That's actually how the problem is given?
Or is that just the solution they give?
It gave me the resolution. I just needed to show that It's true
Yeah I really don't think either one is that much more common than the other
You can just show that f(1)=1 and f(2)=2
and that pretty much shows that both definitions are equivalent
since at every other value of x they are explicitly equal
The only thing that confused me there, was this different way of defining f(x)
Just need to get used to this representation too, I guess
Yeah, honestly the most common and convenient way to define this would just be |x-1| + |x-2|
They're just trying to get you used to piecewise functions, I'd guess
in practice, there's really no reason not to just do |x-1| + |x-2|
@willow bloom Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @willow bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure I understand y=3x so m is 3 and both the x and y intercept are 0 so how can I have two ordered pairs to graph
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help guide me on how to work this out 🙏
NOOO
Or do you wanna learn Newton's method of optimization
That's what I thought
smarter baby smarter 😞
OMG
THNAK YOU SO MUCh
i guess i was trying too hard to find a simpler solution by like
idk finding a way to factor the num and denom
.close
Closed by @sinful atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Plug in the intervals for X but for 8+h h will replace X
Average rate of change is basically the slope from (8, f(8)) to (8+h, f(h+8))
Hmmm got it
you should close this channel
Do it by typing: .close
@timber knot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've got the following form:
(b^4 - a^4)/(b^3 - a^3)
and i'm trying to figure out the behavior as b approachess a
im pretty sure this is a limit problem, on which imm a bit rusty
intuitively, due to the context of the problem, I expect this to go to zero
but i cant articulate why this is
i mean obviously either term invidivually goes to zero
but how do I know the top goes the zero faster than the bottom? if it were the other way around, this woud surely blow up yeah?
you can factor the numerator & denominator using difference of squares/difference of cubes
you can factorize both the numerator and the denominator and see if it does go to 0
hmm okay let me think about that
Did you progress?
@stoic tiger Has your question been resolved?
I was able to decompose the top into (b^2 - a^2)(b^2 + a^2), and then that into (b-a)(b+a)*(b^2+a^2)
and then after that
the denominator into (b-a)(b^2 +ab+a^2)
then we lose a factor of b-a which is nice
but not quite clear to me where to go after that
You're going correct
The whole becomes
(b+a)(b²+a²)/(b²+ ab +a²)
Now put the limit
well if I plug b = a, Im pretty sure a lot of that reduces, ending p with just 2a
oh
hold on
i make error
You want help?
i think it actually reduces to 4a/3
no problem!
.close
Closed by @stoic tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for the rescue
thank u sir
yeah part c
Do you know whats a double root?
How can we start?
(I think the quadratic formula might come in handy again)
no?
Right!
$\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$
moaforlife
Yeah right!
Closed by @raw quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
Closed by @balmy root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi is this correct?
@patent stirrup Has your question been resolved?
total standard deviation should be 0.7 * √18
@patent stirrup Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @patent stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know how to do the others
but trig function i have no idea how to do algebraically
just sub theta =0
I wasn't given a chart of their values so idk what they are
0/1
ig it's fine to just use my calculator
¯_(ツ)_/¯
pretty sure ill have on my test
ty
.close
Closed by @swift olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the limit can be simplified further
you cannot put that yet
.reopen
✅
what do you mean?
put sin(2theta) = 2sin(theta)cos(theta)
I don t understand ...if the function is continuous at x=0 then the limit if f(0)
cos theta cancels out in numerator and denominator
I don t see the reason to add another step to the computation
f(x) / g(x) != f / g
you can't just get rid of the input to a function 
bro
bri
the answer key just put's the answer as 0
that's fine as well but the question says to simplify it algebraically
yeah ig
.close
Closed by @swift olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
that works this way as well
i think it's fine
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Graph the following function...
How could I have known that the answer is C and not D.
you can start by graphing log(2 - x) then using absolute value properties to continue
(in truth, neither C nor D is a very good match for what this graph looks like, but C is slightly better i guess…)
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have answered what i can. all i need is for someone to help me whether my answer is correct
1.) AB = 0 -> A = 0 \/ B = 0
2.) 2(A+B) = AB -3
kin hell yk what ill just take a picture of my paper
14.) is neg(P) -> neg(R)
@frosty thicket Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the question states Use the symmertry of each quadratic function to din the maxiumum or miniumum points sketch each graph showing all axes crossing points . Am trying to solve for 1A I just need to know how to find the range for my graph
How do i know the range for my quadratic equation\
@proven ridge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@proven ridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @proven ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bacc
I would like to know if my proof is correct or if there is some fallacy
how did you get this
that term looks to be between 0 and 1
which would mean that this inequality should be reversed
.close
Closed by @red nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to find if true or false
consider the dimensions
its when they said multiply A
like how do i mulktiply a whole matrix by a row
row vector, so it's just matrix-vector multiplication
treat the row as a matrix with 1 row and however many columns
do you eman column row expansion
like this?
yes but notice the difference between this and the question you are asked
uhh thing is
idk whats matrix vector multiplication
matrix vector multiplication is multiplying a matrix by a vector (where a vector is a matrix with only 1 row or only 1 column)
which im not sure how its different from this
the size of the matrices determines whether they can be multiplied together and the size of the result
so if i have a matrix A with size m×n and a matrix B with size r×s then:
- for AB to make sense we need n = r
- AB will have size m×s
- for BA to make sense we need s = m
- BA will have size r×n
ah then from this can i assume that
you can assume that A has the appropriate size to be multiplied with B, but you should not make any further assumptions
then
its false beause it would have to be multiplied by the jth row of A column
to get ith row of matrix AB
cuz otherwise it might not be ith row
if taken the whole matrix
oh it was false okay i got it tysm
.close
Closed by @lyric kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need research help in discrete math / computer science
help channels are for specific problems/questions. do you have something
yeah, basically I need to choose a good research problem
but is specific in discrete math
"picking a research problem" isn't really specific, and probably out of scope to most helpers
try cs server in #old-network
or ask in #discrete-math
also you cant just say research and expect that people know what you mean. do you mean actual research? I doubt it
sorry lol, ok I will be more specific
I found a wiki page about the partition problem, and there were a lot of problems there.
so I am thinking what is a good problem to try in there
or a generalization variation etc
without being too hard for undergraduate lol
try whatever looks like you can do on your own or watch youtube videos on the problems
I am interested in how can we apply the partition problem in other areas of mathematics
still too vague
do this
ok I will look on youtube. or something
can giveme some general ideas for thinking in a research project?
I am trying to do something new (without being too much professional, I am just at undergrad lol)
I mean, still good, but maybe something short in extension
no, again nobody knows what you know. and again, help channels are for specific math problems
oh lol , sorry
I will check then
where could I ask this when I find something interesting?
Closed by @full canyon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have problems progressing in my calculations in this question. The question states:
'Given three linear independent vecotors A, B and C, construct a vector X who builds the same angle with all three vectors. Where X can be written as a linear combination as i have done in my calculation. Then i am to decide the scalars, alpha, beta and gamma only using the vectors A, B and C.
Thanks for any help!
@signal dove Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
whilst you can do it like this
we have problems with the fact that A.X has A.B and A.C terms
we'd like all of that junk to cancel out
||instead, consider what happens if we write X in terms of AxB, BxC and CxA||
Is in your case A•X the standard inner product?
Yeah it should be
Well i guess it has to be
yeah
did this make sense @signal dove ?
Yeah i get what you meant but i don't see how that would simplify anything
lemme upload a photo
The only thing I could add if X is a linear combination of the basis then A•X is equal to A•(a*A)
(With a being the coefficient for the part of A in the combinations of X)
Since you can write X as the combination, apply linearity for each vector component and it will all turn to zero except if you look at the A component (since they all create a basis)
You mean if A =(a,0,0)?
and now note that A.BxC = [A,B,C]
so the problem is easy now
(i.e. set alpha = |A|, beta = |B|, gamma = |C|)
Ah yes i see what you mean, but wouldn't then A,B and C have to be orthogonal, which it never states in the problem description that they have to be? or am i wrong?
wdym?
CxA is perpendicular to A so dotting it with A always cancels out etc
Yeah that i get, but don't you consider BxC=A which isn't necesarilly true?
now if you look at my expression here, dot X with A to get
alpha(A . B x C)
now A.BxC is the scalar triple product
so if we set alpha = |A|, beta = |B| and gamma = |C|
we get that A.X/|A| = [A,B,C] (i.e. the scalar triple product) so all of them are equal
What the fuck, im in my 6th semester of studying math and never ever have I heard of the scalar triple product
Im gonna check my scripts of my firsr courses but I have never seen this occuring
But that was a smart way to solve it
Just intuivly this seems like 'to simple' of an anwser,
but i guess it should work
thanks for the help, gonna do som testing with it to see if it holds
nw!
ngl i didn't come up with it myself lol, it appeared in a past exam paper i did
haha thats nice!
I see but still, its something I have never heard in my life. Particularly vector product was done in one really short subchapter about the concept of orthogonality
.close
Closed by @signal dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
huh interesting
i might have done my algebra incorrectly somewhere but that's the idea
It should work though, since the triple scalar product is commutative
Isn't this the problem, or am i wrong, but that since BxC not necessarily = A then we change the equation?
Why should that be an issue
It doesnt matter what basis we used to contruct as X, as long as the coefficient were picked dependant on A,B and C
But lets say here we put alpha=|A|, we are then left with A*(BxC)
And from the next one we will get: B*(CxA) right?, but what says that these are equal?
isn't it anti-commutative
I just read on it and it says its commutative
LY could prolly say it with 100% guarantee
@mellow crag (sorry)
Yeah you are right!
BUT WHY DOESNT IT WOOOORK
im to tired for thiss
wait one minute
i'm stupid
brb
OH MY FUCKING GOD I JUST REALISED WE DID TALK ABOUT IT
But I was getting hammered by college level math back then, that I was unable to understand it
OH RIGHT IT ISNT COMMUTATIVE BUT IT RETAINS ITS VALUE WHEN YOU "ROTATE" THE VECTORS IM THERE
Ups Caps lock
yeah right but it actually holds in this case
Yeah thanks to how we constructed the new basis
Closed by @signal dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Well, can you identify any similar triangles here?
i have no idea
t r and s make one
p q s
Yep
my brain doesnt comprehend all of this
And can you tell me how long QS is compared to RS?
Exactly
is it 20
Because pqs and trs are similar,
That means if QS is twice the length of RS, PQ is twice the length of TR
Bingo 🎉
i finished the assignment thank u
You're welcome!
.close
Closed by @cosmic plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
?
Well, consider EPC and ENA ( the triangles)
It looks awfully similar to the last question you had, no?
There's a lot of irrelevant information
And I'd hardly call it a different shape
It's just presented a bit differently
Whoever wrote this question was trying to be tricky
Don't let them trick you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this question, I am confused a little. I understand that the question is trying to trick you by saying that these values are part of the increasing techincally. But aren't there 2 non increasing points? It isn't increasing at -2 or 2 since those are exclusive brackets
I mean just x^2+4 seems like a possible equation for f(x)
yes
but the function isnt increasing or decreasing at -2
or 2
because the bracket is exclusive
if it was [2, infinity) that would make more sense for example
does the question state that it must not be increasing at 2 or just that it is increasing from 2 to inf
yeah the given intervals are exclusive but it doesnt necessarily mean something else must be true at those points
okay so its liek a trick question kindas
maybe
how would i algebraicly get x^2 + 4
its a thinking question which means not a regular question
quadratic implies that the highest exponent of x in the equation will be 2, the info it gives about the intervals shows you that the parabola will be open upwards, and the given y-intercept shows that f(0)=4; so from the 1st and 2nd facts you can start with x^2 and with the 3rd fact you get x^2+4
yeah okay, so just logic basically. i get it, i was just wondering if there was an algebraic way. thanks tho
.close
Closed by @round gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. Is this a good place to ask about "significant figures" in physics?
Closed by @stark glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
i think so
the digits right
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
?
So I have this question:
"
The time for 30 pendulum swings is measured 10 times.
53.1s, 53.3s, 52.8s, 53.4s, 52.8s
52.8s, 53.4s, 53.4s, 53.2s, 53.2s.
a) Find the average value of the measurements and the uncertainty.
b) Determine the period (the time for one pendulum swing) and the uncertainty in this.
"
And another question:
"
The acceleration of a body with initial velocity (1.8 ± 0.3)m/s is given to be (3.4±0.3)m/s^2.
a) What is the speed of the body (3.5±0.1)s after start
b) How far has the body moved during this time?
"
===================
For 1a) the first bit, I simply added all the measurements together and /10 to get the "mean". Then I found the uncertainty by recognizing the highest and lowest measurement, and took mean - (highest OR lowest) = uncertainty value.
so for 1a) I wrote 53.1 +- 0.3 as my answer.
For 1b) Since the mean time was calculated for entire 30 swings, i took (mean time)/30 to get the Period.
I got 1.77, and I know that uncertainty doesn't change in value when dividing by a constant. But in the answer, I wrote "2 +- 0.3" because (mean time) was divided by a number with one significiant figure.
When I sent those answers written, I only got 1/2 points and I don't know what I did wrong.
Would you like a quick anwser?
To compare with mine yes.
I don't want to type all the explaining
I simply need to see what I did wrong in terms of sig figures.
It's driving me nuts, because it's not easy to ask
1a) Average time: 53.14 ± 0.28 s
1b) Period: 1.77 ± 0.01 s
2a) Speed after start: (13.7 ± 0.5) m/s
2b) Distance moved: (31.5 ± 1.8) m
And you considered significant figures?
I have
I have a friend on a call with me
He believes what I said is right
I might be wrong
I don't really know why 0.28s is an accepted answer, because it has two sig figures but the question/values in calculation contains 3 sig figures.
many small details, im lost lol
Well
Wait
OH
Its 0.3 not 0.28
I think
That's what my friend said to tell you
Now I think about it he's right
how about 53.14? Isn't it supposed to be 53.1 because the question contains 3 sig figures?
Because when you calculate an average or any derived quantity, the result should be rounded to reflect the precision of the measurements involved.
The rounding rules
Don't forgot
53.1 +- 0.3 is the correct answer for 1a)? 0.28 rounds to 0.3 and 53.14 rounds to 53.1
And for period, how did you end up +- 0.01?
Step 1
do uncertainties change when you divide it by a constant?
Wait
When dividing by a constant, the relative uncertainty remains the same.
The relative uncertainty in the average time is:
0.3/53.1 apply this relative uncertainty to the period
but 1.77, how many signficiant figures do you include here? You divide 3sig/1sig, so aren't you supposed to round this value to 1 signfigcant figure?
are you using chatgpt?
No
ok.
I have a friend whos helping me
That's how I talk/write
wait.
What
(0.3/53.1)*1.77, where did this come from?
Here
Not there
Wait
Here
I think I understand.
Closed by @stark glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I need help understanding why 1.77 is the answer and not "2" because of significant figures.
alright. i'll be asking others who may be passing by this chat.
""
The time for 30 pendulum swings is measured 10 times.
53.1s, 53.3s, 52.8s, 53.4s, 52.8s
52.8s, 53.4s, 53.4s, 53.2s, 53.2s.
a) Find the average value of the measurements and the uncertainty.
b) Determine the period (the time for one pendulum swing) and the uncertainty in this.
"
And another question:
"
The acceleration of a body with initial velocity (1.8 ± 0.3)m/s is given to be (3.4±0.3)m/s^2.
a) What is the speed of the body (3.5±0.1)s after start
b) How far has the body moved during this time?
"
.close
Closed by @stark glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The constant term is 168. Find k.
Honestly, I am so clueless...
Pascal's Triangle and combinations really aren't helping.
you can find which term it is
itll happen when [x^4]^(7-n) * [x^{-3}]^(n)=x^(-7)
n starting at 0, if thats of any help
I fear I understand nothing
consider the bottom, im saying you can use it to find the term where you have a x^(-7) in the expansion, which when you distribute the x^7 from outside of it will leave you with the constant term
so if you find n, you also know what the 7Cr value will be since youll have r
(the n in my original message)
or you could just do the expansion wholly, 7 isnt that much
WHAT-
I HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT
IN MY LIFE
Im so sorry but i have no clue what that is
Ive done sigma notation but we havent learnt that exactly
but we learnt sigma notation just this week
eh? i assumed this is what you meant by pascals triangle
No
1
1 1
1 2 1
1 3 3 1
etc.
yeah i know
& also the other option of calculating the term
the nCr follows that
the
here the thing that look like vectors are nCr
n is the top value r is the bottom one
what are vectors?
the nk represent
n and r?
Oh we learnt that format
but not with sigma notation-
im not entirely sure how to explain it in a way that really adds anything to the picture
Oh that's fine
but would u admit my teacher is insane
literally refreshed ourselves on pascal's triangle and learnt this nCr today
AND WE DIDNT EVEN DO QUESTIONS LIKE THAT
AND HE EXPECTS US TO DO ALL THEESE QUESTIONS
if theyre asking you to do that without yet teaching binomial expansions, then yeah
its probably in your next few lessons though
binomial expansions?
no he said our unit is done
we're having a quiz next monday
odd
this is a binomial expansion
well ive seen it in
for natural n
(x+2)^7 or so
and ive expanded those
but i dont see how that can possibly help w/ figuring out k
The constant term would be
7C7 wouldn't it?
Which is just 1
Since the constant term is last?
the last term in your expansion would be k/x^21
Wouldn't it be
but even when you distribute the x^7 its still not a constant

