#help-33
1 messages · Page 163 of 1
Because -52.244 m is the height
a we are referring to sea level that would be 0
this would mean the bird is starting underwater and diving further down'
32^2=2 (-9.8) x (0-x) (-9.8 multiply -x) =9.8 x
Okok let me step back and do it again
1024m^2/s^2 / 2(-9.8m/s) = -x
1024m^2/s^2/-19.6m/s = -x
Oh I see
its positive 52.224 m
Did I do the problem correctly?
yes
Okok
Yes I would like to know
have you been told that gravity is always to be taken with a negative sign
but that is not always the case
lets say you were measuring things from the point where the seagull was jumping from
ok
is this a rhetorical question?
no it has answer
Okok
basically what i am trying to say is if you measure along the direction of gravity you take g to be possitive
Wdym by the position of where the seagull was diving
lets say i am standing on a building and measuring from top to bottom then i would take g=+ve but if i am measuiring from bottom to top then g=-ve
Wouldn't it be the other way around?
no
you can understand it by the seagull example
write the equation from both perspective
first from bottom to top which we did
then from top to bottom
Right but wouldn't the direction from the bottom to top be negative acceleration?
yes
Since we are moving the the negative altitude
Right so then wouldn't gravtiy be -9.8 m/s because its weighting the seagull down -9.8 m/s and not lifting it up 9.8 m/s
Also are you open to help me with another problem? I'm confused on how to find the correct equations to use
Ahhh I see
We top to bottom is we are talking about the relation from the ground
yes
not from the position of the falling object
you assume ground to be initial position
but from top to bottom you take the objects falling positon to be initial positon
This problem I just need the correct equation and then I could figure it out
but the next problem I need a lot of help on
- has a lot of steps
For this is got Y initial = 0m, Y final = 1.1m, Time = ?, Acceleration = -9.8m/s
Does the guys height matter in this problem?
well his height doesnt matter
Okok
we will consider only his legs
consider his legs to be a point which goes up by 1.1 m
Right so his legs go up 1.1 m
I got the variables down
but idk which equation fits
because they all use velocity
which is not given
no one of them uses displacement
then whats final velocity?
not needed
have you memeorized all of the equations or need to refer to them
but it still doesn't make sense to me
I have a physics sheet I'm allowed to use for tests and the ap exam
so I don't need to memorize them
when intial and final velocity along with time and accelaration is given or asked use the first equation
when intial velocity displacement time and accelaration is given use second equation
when intital velocity final velocity accelaration and displacement is given use third equation
in this question you have intial velocity displacement and accelration and asked time
Ok let me try to work through this this
Our equation is
X final = X initial + Velocity Initial x time + 1/2 x Acceleration x time squared
So to rewrite it
yes
1.1m = 0m + 0m/s x ? +1/2 x -9.8m/s squared x ? squared
yes
1.1m = 1/2 times - 9.8m/s squared x ? squared
nope
rmember the signs
this concept
??
before solving a kinematics question choose where you will measure things from
ok
Ohhhh
its positive 9,8
9.8
since its relation to the ground
not to the person?
where have you decided to measure from?
are you measuring from the ground?
Yes
Okok
So what is wrong here?
since you are measuring height from ground it will be 0-1.1 = -1.1
Why -1.1?
I'm lost
don't u jump up 1.1 m and not down -1.1m
Oh wait
but 1.1 m is our ending
not our intial
so he is coming down at 1.1m
so its negative
Ok
Thank you for your help
I will probably ask someone else for problem 55 because that one is difficult af
try yourself now
you are ready for solving any question
all concepts you have need to think
time squared write
2.2/9.8=x^2
in the equation there is two t's
the eqaution is 1.1=1/2(9.8)xt^2
what is v intial value
0
Oh wait wait
@worthy obsidian so its the initial time also 0?
it confused me because it didn't state it was the initial time
there is no symbol
@ember saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ember saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i show something this obvious
.close
Closed by @lyric kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone pls explain how to do B
When I substitute y = 0, why does it not work
You are basically looking for the roots
You can use the zero product theorem
So I should sub y = 0 and solve the quadratic equation
Thanks I got the answer
B is 2 and c is -3 is that correct??
Yup
But how do I find the line of symmetry
Usually for these questions it's on a graph
But this does not have a graph so I can't just see the values
It is in the middle between the two roots
Is it (2 + (-3) ) /2
yes!
Closed by @turbid galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
x = (2+(-3))/2 *
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What you try bro
well it was originally csc2x/cotx
thats as far as i got and then i got stuck
oh i forgot
sin(2x)=2cos(x)sin(x)
Is okay, we all forget things sometimes
Earlier I forgot for 10 minutes anything about the whole entire yesterday. Thought I was losing it
My fish oil must not be working
would i also use the double angle formula here?
can someone help me with this one?
you can apply the same thing
or alternatively do something like express x^2 in the form
k * (2x)^2
or do a sub like u = 2x
it'd be 4 *,
limx--->0 sinx/x =1
the 2 gets squared too
oh so
same identity as you would've applied above
Closed by @fallen ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this?
if ur allowed to, i think l'hopital's just works
im not allowed to
no
the examples tell me to make the fraction 0/0 so asqrt(2) - b = 0 then manipulate what i got to find a and b
oh right
so if we can find the limit as x->1 of
(sqrt(x+1)-sqrt(2))/(x-1)
er i got a = 4 and b = 4sqrt(2)
then we'd be done (then just find the appropriate factor in front for a)
is this right
yeah
you can then simplify this fraction to get
oh dang
1/(sqrt(x+1)+sqrt(2))
i feel like a linear approximation is still too 'calculus'-y?
yeah
can i ask another question?
sure
I just saw this method today lol so I proposed, especially because the term (x-1) appears
yh fair
but like in order to get the linear approximation the normal way to do it is to just differentiate
there are probably some obscure ways where you can get a linear approximation without differentiating
(or without like analysis)
yeah so the same method we did up there works for this one
realise that we can take the factor of a out so it's sufficient to find the limit as x->2 of $\frac{\sqrt{x-1}-1}{x-2}$
LY
then stare at the fraction for long enough to realise it simplifies
(if we're avoiding calculus at like all costs, and we haven't done like analysis basics, it's generally quite hard to do limits)
(so a lot of the time it does end up being that the fraction we have simplifies and we get something nice)
Closed by @cunning oak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi so ik the formula
i got the intersection = 0.125
but i don’t how to get pr of B which is probability of at least one head
is the formula you are using 
jl7up~
yea
ah k
you first calculate P(A)
than you calculate P(B)
afterwards you calculate
,, P (A \cap B)
jl7up~
afterwards you substitute the values into this formula and youll get the answer
just the hint that the answer is a decimal (i would call it endless)
nice friends
@cerulean drift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if a divides b-x then does a+x divide b?
What makes you think it would 
i dont think any addition or subtraction is divisible
@brave spire Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the equation is D(q) = -q^2 -2q +517
Im just not sure what the q axis is?
Oh nvm I got it, it was 21.759, never heard it as q axis, always as x axis
.close
Closed by @open seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why I integrate from pi to 2pi and the answer is opposite
@oblique void Has your question been resolved?
@oblique void Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @oblique void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys, what does they mean? Isn’t b the same as letter A? 
A and b are different letters
no it means intersection of the tangents
Like if u extend the tangents they will meet
ohhhhh
so basically the intersection of the tangents with the points A and B that was previously answered in the first questionn?
Ya
@near elbow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @near elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thankyouuu
Thank youuu
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I'm wondering what is the most efficient technique to solve this system of equations.
Elimination should work fine
ur teacher is toxic for giving those numbers
I dont know about most efficient way but the cleanest would be to work with an augmented matrix imo
Observe the denominators
Does Elimination work on every system of equations?
Notice how you can multiply by 5, 61 and 221 to get rid of the fractions
you got a point
let me try
Now it looks easier
I think I need to learn how to work with an augmented matrix
I see people using that all the time
it's just this without a, b and c
just the coefficients
so you only focus on the numbers or have a better overview
So an augmented matrix is nothing but a cleaner format of the original matrix ?
I see
ye
You could do gaussian elimination with the equations as is. Row operations <-> combining equations in the system
Ok, what do we need an augmented matrix for ?
But you definitely wouldn't want to write x y z out for every set of row operations
Ok I see
Augmented matrix is used to write full linear equations in matrix forms
what about the non-linear ones ?
The augmenting part lets you include the stuff on the other side of the equals sign
In general you dont use linear algebra techniques for non linear equations
Systems of non linear equations can require many different kinds of approaches
just like this, am I correct ?
really ?
looks good
Closed by @whole tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Sort of a dumb question but can an integral equal a complex number? The real part of this complex number is the value of the integral I want
the left side is absolutely a real number with 0 imaginary part
the right side is not
so i don't know where you get "=" from
,w int 0 to inf 1/(x^3 + 1)
yea that looks like the real part of the right side
I put it in quotation mark because I don’t know if it equals that
I just want to know if it’s okay to say the integral equals the left side and “omit” the right side
If not, must’ve done something wrong in the calculation
id assume integrals cant be complex as long as the integrand is real
cause the def is the area under the curve, which cant be complex
Can it be possible to take the real part on both sides
wdym both sides
Something like this
ya thats true
im just saying that the integral on the left shouldnt have a complex part
Let’s say I is a convergent integral that equals some real number so can I say Re(I) =I
@dull sable Has your question been resolved?
@dull sable Has your question been resolved?
what's your question ?
What do you mean by question,I already asked the question
So if that’s true, would this be allowed
Do you wanna know how to evaluate this integral
The equation itself is meaningless
Well In evaluating the integral I got that equation
I just wanted to verify if the real part can equal the integral, if not that's fine but want to be 100% sure
no dude it makes no sense a real number cannot be equal toa complex number
i can surely use complex numbers to maks computations if there is no fucking up in domains any ranges of my functions but i do not get a complex number as a "result"
suppose you had to integrate sinx
you can write it as( e^ix - e^(-ix))/2i
because that doesn't affect the overall function it will be the same
Maybe I messed up somewhere here
use partial fractions to evalute this
factorise it as (x+1)(x^2 -x + 1)
I'm aware of doing it that way but here I tried using contour integration
This was the setup, but I’m still a beginner to these concepts
.close
Closed by @dull sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@stark field Has your question been resolved?
easiest way to know if it works or not is just to plug in some random value p
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
but yes c is correct
got it my bad
Closed by @lean falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1/2quotient rule((x+1)/x)^-1/2
alternatively, do it implicitly
the square root of something is not 1/2 times that thing
or you're doing chain rule
the latter
1/2sqrtx
is sqrt(x+1)/(x) the same as sqrt(x+1)/sqrt(x)
if so can i do just quotient rule here
might be easier to just write the fraction as 1+1/x
wdym
(x+1)/x is the same as 1+1/x
the second one is much easier to deal with
no quotient rule
can you show me how
how what
how do i apply this
well you differentiate sqrt(1+1/x) instead
so sqrt2/sqrtx
Denascite
@celest folio Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, good afternoon, someone help me with this exercise pls?
Ex.4) State V or F (justifying): If R and S are relations of order in A, then:
(d) If R⊂S ∧ S is total order -> R is total order.
@dreamy hull Has your question been resolved?
The difference between a partial and total order is the strongly connected axiom, so does the subrelation necessarily satisfy this?
@dreamy hull Has your question been resolved?
not necessarily?
@dreamy hull Has your question been resolved?
if you think so then you should find an explicit counterexample
@dreamy hull Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question, does 2n! mean (2n)! or 2(n!)
$2n!$ would be $2 \cdot n!$
tobi
wat
uh
Tobi is correct
well dang mb
factorial only binds to the object directly after that
recall FPEMDAS
factorial parenthesis exponent multiplication division addition subtraction
Err, how would you apply factorial before parentheses? That would mean the factorial applied to just the ), which makes no sense
idk tbh some people might say the parentheses are implied and 2n! is clearly meant to mean (2n)!
thats what i thought
i mean the context is this if that helps
no, you always use brackets
it is ambiguous though
I challenge you to find a calculator that does this
a calculator would never do that, but often people writing math leave the parentheses unwritten
in lots of cases
my point is that it's ambiguous so you should be clear
I can't say I've ever seen that
in this case it is 2(n!)
im pretty sure
ok tysm
hey some people write $\ln x$ instead of $\ln(x)$. $\ln x^2$ is therefore ambiguous
i can tea lore
i think it's a perfectly valid question for @bleak obsidian to ask. it's not obvious imo, and seriously worth clarifying.
personally, i would write 2(n!) rather than 2n!
I agree that no one should write ln x, but that's a different thing that people actually do in practice
2n! is just awful. at least add a \, so it's 2 n! or something
never said that. i do it all the time
i mean i would write ln x instead of ln(x), but writing lnx^2 is just bad
(sin²(x) is also dumb notation while I'm at it)
(good notation)
yeah and that's kind of my point. if you write ln x, then you should be very careful when potentially ambiguous situations arise.
notation can be ambiguous when parentheses aren't clear. so the answer isn't always obvious. and parentheses can clutter things and they take time to write, so it's not as simple as write parentheses around everything like you're typing it into one of those tiny calculators.
writing 2((x)^2)+3(x)-3 is dumb
anyway, im glad you asked about this rather than try to prove an incorrect statement. good luck proving it
tyty 🙏
.close
Closed by @bleak obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the value of sin∅.cos∅ if tan is equal to root 2 minus one
How are tan, sin, and cos defined?
?
The 3 functions that you're taking about, what are they?
How would you write down an equation for each of them?
If tan∅= √(2) -1 then find value of sin∅.cos∅
If you answer my question then you'll work out how to solve that pretty quickly
I know tan∅ is written as sin∅/cos∅
Maybe find theta first
If you want a hint, trigonometric functions are just illusions of each other
That's probably the less direct way to do it, but it works
I mean idk how to proceed after doing $\frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}=\sqrt{2}-1$
0_א
we know tan
so making a triangle and finding other trig ratios is not difficult at all
I was thinking tan = opposite/adjacent rather than tan=sin/cos
oh nice
no prob
how are you getting that?
use sin theta = root(1 - cos^2theta)
what else are you applying
Wait is he finding the product of sin and cosine?
i think thats abt it
I didn't notice the dot
ohh
@vague raven Has your question been resolved?
But how
And how would u find opposite and adjacent
do you know about the pythagorean identities in trigonometry?
like sin^2theta + cos^2theta = 1
Yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is there a y-1
oh is it just doing some weird way of showing that they cancel since it equals 0 when you plug in 1
.close
Closed by @native iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys how do i do this>
apply the property concerning the angles of an isosceles triangles
to set up an equation
thank u
mhmm
u got what i did?
yea
since opposite sides of isosceles triangle is equal
the first equation then do the thingamabob
both equations should be equal since opposite angles are equal in isosceles triangles
alr
@quaint sentinel
tanks
no worries!
@quaint sentinel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quaint sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve this problem:
given that 1 is approaching from the left, meaning that its gif if 0. then i substitute it
it becomes 0/(0-1)+0 = 0
is this correct?
<@&286206848099549185>
calculate lhl and rhl differently
oh wait they asked only 1-
i assume [x] is integer part of x
right answer but wrong method
yea
whats the proper method?
didn't saw that 1- too☠️
answer is 0 no?
exact 0
There is a lemma saying that $\lim_{x\to a-} = \lim_{x\to a-\text{ and }|x-a|<\epsilon}$
uop
choose a small enough epsilon, then you simplify the expression inside
numerator exactly equals 0 so...
its exact 0/0 approaching
thats 0 exactly
yes, and the denominator is not 0, but it only works when x is close to a, hence the lemma
if numerator exaclty equals 0 then theres no other question arised
???
0/0.0000000000001=0
you can't say the whole limit is zero unless, denominator is non-0
what?
numerator is exactly 0
and denominator approaches 0
so thats 0/0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
it does not
which is 0
in this case it really doesn't matter, because the numerator is a zero constant
i dont understand 
wdym it does not
denominator is -1exact +1 approaching, which is 0.00001
but you may send the wrong message that the same argument works with something like x/x
something
whats your doubt
logarithm is whole vast topic
so, what you can say instead is $\frac{[x]}{[x-1]+x} = 0$ when $x$ is close to $1$ from the left, and it really has nothing to do with the denominator, as long as the denominator is not exactly 0, i.e. the expression is well-defined.
uop
thats what i said, literally homie 😭
thats what i said, that since the numerator is exaclty 0, and denominotr is a number that is NOT zero
so the overall limit is 0
@topaz rock did youunderstand?
if u guys mean that 0/1 = 0, then yeah lol
limits is so confusing man
i just dont understand whats the "proper" method
0(exact)/any number which is APPROACHING zero=0
this is not an indertiminant form
but 0 approaching/0 approaching
is an indeterminant form, and then u have to use methods to solve the limit
idk much about logrithms rules
ahh i see
take a clas
is the numerator 0 exactly?
yes
isn't this server where u can learn maths? 💀
1- means like 0.9999999999999999999
and gif of 0.9999999999 is 0 exactly , correct?
yup
well, we cant explain a whole ass vast topic like that, can help you with questions
logarithm has a whole world to itself
I see
i suggest, search up a lecture for logarithm in youtube
since logs are very important
thanks @still temple imma leave now
youre welcome
.close
Closed by @topaz rock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm doing a physics report where I measure the magnetic field strength and its effect on the time it takes for a simple electromagnetic train to complete a set distance. I need to derive a formula that can compare the directly this effect, but I am currently facing several problems, such as how to correctly calculate the work done by the magnets. Any help is appracited thanks!
@fathom jay Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm doing a physics report where I measure the magnetic field strength and its effect on the time it takes for a simple electromagnetic train to complete a set distance. I need to derive a formula that can compare the directly this effect, but I am currently facing several problems, such as how to correctly calculate the work done by the magnets. Any help is appreciated thanks!
I'm doing a physics report where I measure the magnetic field strength and its effect on the time it takes for a simple electromagnetic train to complete a set distance. I need to derive a formula that can compare the directly this effect, but I am currently facing several problems, such as how to correctly calculate the work done by the magnets. Any help is appracited thanks!
@fathom jay Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fathom jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me find the area of fbgk and explain it
bro what
can u atleast describe
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
bro uses ms paint for making diagrams
bro is tryinf to summin a demon
much better lol
i cant type :(
tryst me, FBGK was nkthing like what u drew
lol
There's no point E
could you translate? google translate is kinda dum dum
yes
abcd is a recangle, ak=ae, ef=fg=gc
i just need the forth
ak=kd=ae=4
ad=8=bc
@delicate smelt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @delicate smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys is this not homogenous f(x,y) ?
@stark field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me how you do this question, pls?
This is the answer, but i dont understand it
why is it PR instead of PQ? and wut is unit vector j
a unit vector is just a vector with length 1
the unit vector pointing from south to north is often called j
I'm not sure about the PR thing
that might be a typo?
I think it is a mistake yes
but you can do the same thing with PQ
@tawdry summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tawdry summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cant solve
I don't understand [bla] notation
@night lion Has your question been resolved?
im cooked 😭
lemme write it n< sqrt(n^2+n+1) <n+1
n^2 < n^2 + n + 1 < (n+1)^2
how did u square
this is wrong. It has to be without []
the inside term
i squared everything in the inequality
ohhh
i squared n and n+1 too
fuck i am so dumb
yea i am cooked
i got it
what u did
i just didnt think of it
i should have
...
[sqrt(n^2+n+1)] =n right
@knotty trellis why tho?
there isnt writte n that n is integer
This is usually assumed when they use the symbol n
in context of limits
if n could be any real, then the limit wouldnt even exist
got it
btw
@knotty trellis
i solved it
but i have a question about it
i used the fact that since f(e^a) is gonna be meeting that point its value its 0
i replaced limit with x->0 and f(x) with x
and then i expanded the taylor series
took common x and got my ans
they used some weird derivative stuff here in the book
I think your approach works
yeah
it did give me right answer
but im wondering
what does it mean when they did that
idk what they did
wait lemme show
there are some special cases though. E.g. f(x) = 0. In that case the whole thing wouldnt even be defined
what do you mean?
I mean that if f(x) = 0, then the problem doesnt have an answer
or better, the answer is that the limit doesnt exist
yeah
this
then they simply removed the derivate f?
are they using the definition of derivative here?
they assumed it's non-zero
factored it out
and canceled
yeah
pretty shady to do that tho what they did
the only thing they used is that there is a tangent line, meaning f'(x) exists at that point
and around it
hmm got it
they used the fact that a tangent is there then it must be differentiable
thanks
.close
Closed by @night lion
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Stop advertising everywhere
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
factorise!
I don't think that's factorable
@deft jewel Has your question been resolved?
OH shoot
not yet
i don't know how to factor it tho
thats my issue
<@&286206848099549185>
pls again?
it says "solve"
You have to find the value of y?
so how do i solve this
Complete the square
yes
Or use quadratic formula
what can I help?
This or quadratic formula
so, im going to be a sophomore in hs going into honors alg 2
my last math teacher did not teach the quadratic formula
in fact, on the final i couldnt answer nearly half the questions and got a 94% bc of the massive curve
so how do i.. figure this out, for lack of better words
what do u know
so far
in math
know how exponents work?
yes
Have you learned quadratic formula
for quadratic function
learn how to factorise
complete the square
quadratic formula
i'm sorry, i dont quite understand what you mean by complete the square?
i think this can't bef actored any further
Closed by @deft jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
k
@deft jewel use the quadratic formula when yo8 can't factorise
Over here a is 1 <the number infront of y^2, b is 8 the no infront of y and -10 is c
This is the formula like they said
i see
It's in the form ax^2 +bx + c
Also u can use your calculator it Solves for you
Remember if B^2 -4ac is less than zero then there is no real answer and the root is imaginary
If u see the formula you'll understand why as you cannot square root a negative number
thank you
If b^2 -4ac is 0 that means there's only one value for x and if more than zero that means 2 values for x
You're welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ai
just put the integral symbol, dont try to solve the integral out
unless you couldn't put the integral symbol....
have you considered the axis of rotation y=4 and the fact that f(x) is sec(x) translated up by 4?
yeah you would have to translate the line y=6 too to y=2 and rotate around 0
Closed by @magic jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no
Closed by @lunar jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- A car moved from one city to another and turns back by using another way. First way is 48km and the second way is 8km shorter than the first way. In the return way, the speed of the car is increased by 4km/h. trip in the second way took Ih less time. Find speed of the car in first way.
Closed by @drifting musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i need to factor this polynomial: x^2 - 3x - 28
would it be (x + 28)(x + 3) or (x + 4)(x - 7)
isn't it just the opposite
i used a calculator
the opposite?
a calculator is good
so is graphing
you could use wolfram here
in #bots
,w (x+4)(x-7) = x^2 - 3x - 28

ohhh okayy
i get it thank you
np
i have another question if ur still here
so i have to divide these two
and (x + 4) cancels out right
does that mean theres a hole in the graph
so long as x doesn't equal -4 (otherwise x+4=0 and you can't cancel zero
yes, there's a hole in the plot at x=-4
okay got it thank you so much
wait where would the vertical asymptote be
<@&286206848099549185>
Yes @lean falcon
for this equation here would the vertical asymptote be x + 7
I'll figure it out
To find the vertical asymptotes, we need to look at the denominator. Vertical asymptotes occur at values of x that make the denominator zero, but not the numerator.
In this case, the denominator is (x + 4)(x - 7). Setting each factor equal to zero gives us:
x + 4 = 0 --> x = -4
x - 7 = 0 --> x = 7
However, we notice that (x + 4) is also present in the numerator. This means that x = -4 is a hole in the graph, not a vertical asymptote.
Therefore, the only vertical asymptote is at x = 7.
Let me know if you have any further questions!
@lean falcon does that help
is that chatgpt
Kinda
it's because sometimes its wrong so i can't go off that
I checked it
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
thats why i said that
Good I don’t need to pull up my host of examples lol
thank you man
lmaoo
sorry to bother again bro i'm trying to find the coordinate of the hole which is x = -4 in this case
i cant seem to find it
,w x^3-21x^2+130x+600, x=-4
Is this the original
Cause if so, the numerator is wrong
thats after i factored the polynomial
here's everything i did
disregard the wording stuff the work is the most important
the wording is just for me to understand better
,w factor x^3-21x^2+130x+600
,w true or false (x+4)(x-10)(x-15)=x^3-21x^2+130x+600
Take that as you will
wait i factored wrong?
Yeah
Yeah
can you help me with this factoring here
i'm confused now
can you see everything
,w x^3-21x^2+130x+600=0