#help-33
1 messages · Page 145 of 1
That's what I mean. If the functions are nice enough, the Maclaurin series of the derivative is just the derivative of the Maclaurin series.
So they start with the series of f(x) and differentiate every term in the series.
really?
like differentiate x/sqrt(x^2+1) to the 5th power?
for 4 points?
isnt that a bit of a stretch
That's not what I'm saying
In a) you have already computed the series for f(x).
Now, you differentiate every term of that series, instead of f directly.
ahhhh
i see
do you have to find the first term indivisdually?
since like
when u derive the series
you cant get 1
which is the first term of the derived series
What is the derivative of $\frac{1}{2}x^2$?
Azyrashacorki
x?
Seems so
/close
.close
@terse gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if f(x)=cos^2(2x) & h(x)=cos^2(4x), then what is (f ° h)' (pi/4)?
so far i got the derivate cos^2(4x)(-sen(2x)*2)+cos^2(2x)(-sen(4x)*4)
but i don't know what I'm supposed to do with "pi/4", so far i try evaluating x as pi/4, but i got -2, than that is no one of my options
Those should probably be multiplied, not added.
cos^2(4x)(-sen(2x)2)+cos^2(2x)(-sen(4x)4)
are you sure that the derivative is right?
And the function h should be plugged in the first part as well, so I guess you should just compute h(pi/4) and h'(pi/4) ahead of time.
Otherwise it becomes gnarly when you could just have those values computed before. It will make it more readable and avoid mistakes.
i mean
i redo the derivate it and i was wrong, the derivate should be -5sen(8x)cos^2(2x)+sen(8x)sen^2(2x)
good
this time i got 0 when evaluating x as pi/4, so i think it should be right now
nice
I hasn't been compiled, it's LaTeX.
dude
And it's missing most of it.
i guess I just mark the question and talk the teacher about it later
yeah
ok in this one I'm lost, not an expert of graphics
wait, no i think i can actually do it
thank you
k
.close
Closed by @trim mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone tell me im not losing my mind
im not losing my mind right
thats correct
so how df does my teach go from that to this
-5/4 a to - 1/4
??/
gotcha
Fr AP gp moment
which part is the confusing part?
i got the answer R = 2
he has gotten R = 6
what i did
what he has done
its 5am
im gonna head to bed in 2 seconds but
wtf
oh wait nvm
Yeah i was being dumb af
since a can not be 0 slap 1 on it
😭
.close
Closed by @crystal valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im getting no solution??
can you show your work
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Its messy
we cant see the full image
Took log with base y both sides
that was the first step,
what happened after that
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve problems with logarithmic power?
for 75, try applying log_2 to both sides
I would apply log_3 to both sides
if i do this like 75 then the answer is 81, which is wrong since, its supposed to be 9
Can you show your work? Because I get the correct answer
log_3 isnt the same as ln
and how does this change things
oh u also did the left side wrong aswell
hm?
wouldnt it just be log_3(x)*log_3(x)?
ye
oh
oh
i see
then its like
x*x=81
which is like
x^2=81
then i root
oooohh
yup
Closed by @rough quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
basically I have this function in desmos where if I input a degree it will convert it to radian and it will take that radian to cos and sin and plot a dot now what I did next was take that sin and cos coordinate and put it and arctan "expecting" it to result the same as d there but however for unknown reasons because of my limits it is not equal
here is the link for the desmos
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/zzqttfojus
@verbal trail Has your question been resolved?
@verbal trail Has your question been resolved?
@verbal trail Has your question been resolved?
I don't know if it helps, but did you know you can change the angle from radians from/to degrees?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@spark otter lets continue
so basically you would have done what they were doing
they did round_down(n/2) swappings
to get a traingular matrix
right?
yeah
@hazy dragon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hazy dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@red prism Has your question been resolved?
@red prism Has your question been resolved?
@red prism Has your question been resolved?
@red prism Has your question been resolved?
Zero for b?
I imagined taking a line integral over the field and it seems like the work cancels out but I'm not sure tbh
Could you send the sketch as well
Right, mostly how I pictured it
Oh ok, it shouldn't be zero I think
The electric field is constant and uniform (I assume) so the p.d. across the wire is $2 l E_0$
StrangeQuarkAL
And then workdone is $2 q l E_0$
StrangeQuarkAL
I still don't understand why the line integral didn't work tho
Wait, it did work
I just calculated it wrong
It's 1AM here so likely won't be able to read it
$$ \int_{-l}^{l} \begin{bmatrix} q E_0 \ 0 \end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix} x \ \sinh(x/a) \end{bmatrix} dx $$
StrangeQuarkAL
Tbh I'm not sure. Super groggy rn
@red prism Has your question been resolved?
What's the meaning of 'tbh'?
I think it is To BE Honest
Yes
Crazy
OK I got an idea
Rewrite either pv1 or pv2 in terms of pv2 or pv1 respectively
@red prism Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @red prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I complete part d, i know half of the terminal velocity is mg/2k but cant acheive the result in the Q
yes
have u subbed in mg/2k for v?
yes
then what did u do after?
i simplified the equation out, I used the part(c) eq
what did u simplify it to?
(2m/k)ln(mg/mg)=0
ln(mg/mg)=ln1=0 ?
whoops its equal to 2m/k[ln(mg/(mg/2))] = 2m/kln2 ??
yes
now it works out nicely thx for helping me spot my error
all good
.close
Closed by @lucid hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in defining a lcm of two integers for instance, why is it if a divides m, and b divides m, then e divides m given that e is an existing multiple, then e is the least of the common multiples
an example of why I ask this is: let a=100, b=50 and m=400
a and b divide m
but if e =200
then it also divides m
but is not the least common multiple
definition of what?
i'm certain I made it clear enough
that last part doesn't make sense to me, wouldn't m be that least common multiple ?
i saw this in a book
oh wait
sorry
is there anything else useful you have to say?
well now that is just the definition, but it depends how your book defines it to begin with
unless
given that there are other existing multiples
you continue dividing
until you get the least
yes?
to be more specific
i don't understand
ok
because this particular value of e does not satisfy the criterion; "least common multiple"
it has a divisor that is also a multiple of a,b
well it does, if it is a common multiple and divides every common multiple of a and b, then it is the lcm
when I said "particular value"
this is just the definition, but I need to know the approach your book takes
I was referring to 200
oh
the criterion says that it needs to be true for every common multiple m of a and b
e=200 doesn't work because for instance m=100 contradicts the criterion
e is the LCM if, for any m such that a and b divide m, e divides m.
.close
Closed by @toxic pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m unsure why we stop where we stop. Why don’t we fully reduce to rref? How can we just say b3=b1+b2 is the only condition?
@obsidian bobcat Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
wait im sorry is the final form here
1 1 2
0 1 1
0 0 0
?
That’s what the professor stopped at yes
I can see that after that we already have a zero row
And therefore a free variable
Right?
Gaussian Elimination
But the first row could be 1 0 2 for example
By reducing the middle 1
I’m just confused why we stopped where it stops
because you can solve a system of equations once youve reduced it to row echolon form
going all the way to reduced row echolon form is just a personal preference
Hmm to me, it looks like each row has its own conditions because none of them is just flat out x1=this
That sort of was confusing me
to be honest i dont know what the b's here are referring to exactly
are you doing gaussian elimination?
Yeah, this is just basically algebra but in the context of linear algebra so like matrix algebra
i know that
ohh
So A is our coefficient matrix
X are the unknowns
Basically, the final assertion at the bottom right that’s written out is what’s confusing me
yeah it wont always just be x1 = c or x2 = b
when youre just reducing it to row echolon form, youll usually end up with a system of equations like
x3 = c
x3 + x2 = b
x3 + x2 + x1 = a
where a b and c are constants
so you plug the value for x3 into the second equation, then the values for x3 and x2 into the third equation, so youve solved for all of the variables
I get that but here what will you plug into what concretely?
the b3 = b1 + b2?
basically that zero row means that b3 - b1 - b2 is equal to zero
so that means that b3 = b1 + b2
sorry can you clarify what you mean exactly?
Yeah, get the logic for that actual row, but I’m just confused how we can immediately know that that is the only condition we need to satisfy in order for it to be consistent
Like we still have row 1 being
X1+x2+2x3= b1
And row 2
X2+x3=b1-b2
well because if its true then that means that the bottom row imposes no problems, and the middle and top row can just be solved to get a solution
but if its false, then you get a contradiction that 0 doesnt equal 0. so that means it isnt consistent in the first place
For me its more the if it true that is a problem. If it’s true, what about the other rows conditions?
they dont pose a problem since solutions can be found for them im pretty sure
Hmmm ok
@obsidian bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obsidian bobcat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help with the geomtery
My teacher told me that I got wrong for the ambiguous case check
I got the angles right, but really don't know what to check
It's law of sine problem
your values keep changing
You need to check the 2 values
improper notation at the start
your angle for y in the ambiguous case is also wrong
Yeah that's what I wrote 2 triangles exist
sometimes only 1 exists
Are the equations you mentioned on top the ambiguous case checking equation?
does the set {{null}, null} have two elements or one?
you need to check this
That's out of topic
there are so many errors there
using sin(a+b)=sinacosb+cosasinb
im in the wrong chat nvm
you shouldn't be setting
<C = sin(C)/8 = ...
like that
wdym law of sine
I agree
why C is a value?
angle C
you start with
sin(C)/8 = sin(30)/6
and that leads to C or <C = whatever
yeah basically
not angle C= balabala
Ohhhh mb
So Sin C = 42
Sin A = 108
you're also missing () or using the inappropriate sign when calculating <A
sinC<1
180 - (30 +42)
or
180 - 30 - 42
Sin C/8 = Sin 30/6
they didn't say sin(A)= 108
Gives me Sin C=42
nonono
And by using the theorm of triangle, 180 - (42+30)=108
Sin C/8 = Sin 30/6
leads to
sin(C) = 2/3
and that gives
C ~ 42° as one of the solutions
Oh wait, since it's ambiguous case, u mean I can't just confirm that the sin c is jsut 42 right?
no
you're again msseeing up the angle with the sine of the angle
sin(C) is not the same as C
sin(C) = 2/3
Can ya'll write a equations on your paper or smth and upload it
angle 0 degrees tp 180 degrees
It's lwk hard to understand without visual components or
$\frac{\sin(\angle C)}{8} = \frac{\sin(30\deg)}{6} \implies \sin(\angle C) = \underbrace{\frac23}_{\text{NOT } 42\deg}$
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
one of the solutions for <C is approximately 42°
i again must repeat that this is not the same as sin(<C)
So after I plug this in to my calc I got 0.66666666... which is equvialent to 2/3
Also the a can be two values
yes, and that is the value of
sin(<C)
Yo
there are two possible triangles
So what you are saying is <C and sine c is totally different value
6>8sin30°
sin(<C) is sine being applied to the angle <C
there are two solutions to
sin(<C) = 2/3
for 0 < C < 180°
taking the sine inverse gives you one of the solutions which you found to be approximately 42°
from the supplementary properties of sine, the other solution would be 180° - 42°
So when i'm checking the ambiguous case check
I shoudl've do 180-42 not 180-72 right?
yes
Ok, then let me start it from the beginning
This is the first step
that sin(<C) is equal to 2/3 or 0.66666666...
the second equelity
why you always use incorrect "="
You should turn to another line of your notebook
and changes the formula
Why don't u write it down on ur own notebook and jsut show me?
That will be way easier for me to understand
if you write like that
@late geode Help
You admit 2x=x
you should start at another line
That is not what I'm saying tho 💀💀
by using an equal sign like that, you are
$$1+1\foreach~in{2,...,9}{\overset\thonk=~+1}\overset\thonk=10$$
$$2\foreach~in{3,...,10}{\overset\thonk=~}$$
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
Dont write many things at one line and connect them with"="
It is a terrible thing
U can tell ik how to use equal signs from the first attachment
because it is not correct
.
that's why we're telling you to correct the issue
because they're not being used appropriately
Yes
if you really want to write a logical continuation from one equation to another, then use arrows \
$\to, \implies$
Now should i go for Sin (<A) or a
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
now you should to the candidates for <C
if you insist like before, you admit sinC/8=sinC
By 180-42?
arcsin(2/3),
and 180° - arcsin(2/3) for the potential ambiguous case
yes
and then try determining <A
when <C = 138
and see if you get a valid value
So when <C = 138, I get <A for 12
yes
<A value is for the other potential angle of <C right? the 138 degree
6 is between 8 and 8sin30°
so there are 2 triangles
if it is shorter than 8sin30°
No answer
each <C has a respective <A
when <C = 138, <A = 12
when <C = 42, <A will be different
When <C is equal to 42, <A should be 108
Ohhh i see the problem
So just to clarify
if AC is longer than 8, one answer
Whenever I'm checking for the ambiguous case, I should seek for the angle C right
You can draw a vertical line from A to BC
use whichever angle you're trying to solve for
Name it AD
Wait then I also have to calculate for a right since we got 2 different triangle
and compare AC and AD
So it should be 2 different value
Value of sine cannot define an angle 0to180°
you need to check the total sum of 3 angles
you need to check 2 possible triangles
.close
Closed by @brazen lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help with derivatives
ok hi
there
hiiii
okok
lemme do the problem
wait does it matter
which order
in the quotient rule
so $\frac{x^2+1}{x-1}$
Dinciii
right?
yes
you wanna go through it or wanna try alone first?
can I try it first
okok
I think I can do it
tell me when you're done
-1?
?
uh oh
I got -1
after simplifying
ummmmm
I took the derivatives
and used the quotient rule
so lemme remind you, quotient rule: $(\frac{a}{b})' = \frac{a'b - ab'}{b^2}$
Dinciii
right
in your case a is what
x^2 + 1
so if you differentiate x^2+1 u get what
2x?
1
so if u sub those back in
(x - 1)(2x) - (x^2 +1)(1)/(x - 1)^2?
does it simplify to 1?
alright then that's it
oh I was about to you give one from my previous test
can we do mine if you don’t mind
okok
f(x) = 3x times square root of x
$3xsqrt(x)$
Dinciii
do yk the definition of a derivative of sqrt(x)?
power rule?
yeah
ahh yeah
so square root of x
would also be written as x^ 1/2?
is that the only law I use????
yes
3/2?
yup
try again
power rule is $(x^n)' = nx^{n-1}$
right
Dinciii
so we get
1/2x ^ 1/2 - 1?
$\frac{1}{2}x^{-\frac{1}{2}}$
Dinciii
yes
ohhh right
Dinciii
Dinciii
thats the derivative of $\sqrt{x}$
Dinciii
but we had $3x\sqrt{x}$
Dinciii
right
yes
remember the product rule: $(ab)' = a'b + ab'$
Dinciii
ofc
I thought you just find the derivative of 3 and multiply it together?
so now we have $(3x\sqrt{x})' = (3x)'\sqrt{x} + 3x(\sqrt{x})'$
Dinciii
right?
right
now that is $3\sqrt{x} + 3x\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}$
Dinciii
right sorry
but
yea
nvm you can do this way easier im a dummy
so $3x\sqrt{x} = 3x^{\frac{3}{2}}$
Dinciii
wait what
hold up
Dinciii
right
Dinciii
right
$3\frac{3}{2}x^{\frac{1}{2}}$
Dinciii
yes
yes
thats it
can you simplify the 3 and 3/2?
yeah thats your 9/2
ahhh okay
yay
okay wait
so how we did it
first we used the product rule?
for the 3x times the square root of x?
and then we used the power rule for that?
to use the properties of powers
oh
we just did 2 ways of doing it
the power rule?
yes so
1st way
2nd way
OHHHH
gotcha
thank youuuuuuu
I have about 8 mins I’m gonna review some stuff
.close
Closed by @torn cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got to this step
I mean here
and the method I thought I could use
would be to square y
and reaarange it in terms of sint
idk why
that doesn't give me the right answer
it is a valid method isn't it?
fak nvm
.close
Closed by @limpid bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
do you mean x?
both terms
could you elaborate on what you did?
damn, that's gotta hurt
wdym haha
$$ y = a + b $$
$$y^2 =/= a^2 + b^2 $$
StrangeQuarkAL
oh
not equal
shit right
wat
😭
But i see so many times
'square root both sides'
'square both sides'
oh
it would be
(a+b)^2 innit
ah ok thank you
.close
Closed by @limpid bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no problem
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I type a matrix in the online office-365 (website) version of Microsoft word?
\matrix()
website
Then & to create new columns and @ to create new rows
\matrix(1&2&3@4&5&6)
I imagine you mean the version on the website
I'm giving you offline instructions, but if it's different for website, then I cannot help you
it's different
thank you anyway
@toxic pelican Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @toxic pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do this??
We only got the area formula for a regular polygon A=1/2ap
I did this
Do you know what the other sides are
No
Have you learned the side lengths of a 30-60-90 triangle
Yes
When I tried to find the long side it was wrong
Or idk
It’s Times Square root 3 right?
Np
@eager dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is just a way of saying the the limit goes to infinity in both directions
yeah, but it says limmit to a, so may be something missing
basically he meant to say that limit in a+ it's +infinity
and limit in a- is -infinity
no
got me confused now ;-;
It looks like it`s just an explanation for the general case.
Like if the derivative tends to either infinity or -infinity at some point a, then the tangent is vertical.
And x^(1/3) is drawn as an example
Yes essentially. Either f'(x) -> infinity or f'(x) -> - infinity.
what an embarrassment ._.
about my answer xd
how dare i say it's even negative... x)
@untold brook Has your question been resolved?
Like understand why an infinite derivative hints at a vertical tangent?
Well if you think about it in terms of the slope of a tangent line, then you might recall that high slope are very steep.
So if you imagine this happening to infinity, it would look like a vertical line
Yes essentially.
@untold brook Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
where did i go wrong here?
i followed previous examples in my notes exactly but i got the wrong answer
i can’t spot my mistake
you just missed the negative sign of first term in the last step
like what?
If you want exact answer then you may try to convert cosine to sine in your answer
There are dozens of forms by trig manupulations, so I think any answer should be considred correct
oh yeah i didn’t think of that
yeah
or you may try by substituting sinx as u
instead of cosx
Closed by @wheat gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the parallel line of ax+by=c?
which question
b
It’s just I have to convert the linear equation into the parallel line of it
Where it says 3x+2y=2
@proud basin
ok do u know what it means if the line is parallel to the other
It’s like same slope but different y-intercept
It’s just idk about how to find the y-int for that parallel line
isn't y intercept just the value of y for which x=0?
you don't need to do it through y intercept
Ik y intercept is (0, y)
is it question b?
do you have a specific point that needs to lie on the line or something?
because i don't see the second condition
(unless you need to find just some parallel line)
It’s like I just need to know what the parallel line of 3x+2y=2 is
infinitely many
So it can be any y-int?
3x+2y = z for z in R\{2}
yes
Oh ic thanks
@fast stream Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are all scalar products of (real) vectors always commutative or is it just the standard scalar product that happens to be?
ie. does the commutative property hold in general for some operation <a, b> of form
I would assume that it should, since this just expands to a sum of products of real numbers and swapping a, b should only really affect the order of factors within products, so this should follow from the commutative property of multiplication in the real numbers?
But I'm not sure that's right
@earnest sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
evaluate the integral of x3/sqrt(a4+x4)dx
Closed by @jolly ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
ok so i had x2=a2tanu
so x4=a4tan^2u
2x=a2.du/dx.sec^2u
and so the original simplify to integral of a^2.secu.tanu/2 du
bruh you edited the power here to be 3 instead of 5
do you realize what that means
what
that means?
we dont give out answers on the server
Im not going to spoil what you can do with that x4 that the x3 now allows
no tell me
but its really simple, once you see it youll know it
ive never heard of anything like that before
no cheating
its not a test
bro is not going to bother figuring it out
yes you have
I didnt say its a "cool new trick"
if its simple, that means youve already done it before, its a standard trick and this time youre having a hard time seeing whats otherwise really simple
theres a simple trick to do with the a4+x4
all i see from that is a trig sub
and the numerator just being x3
you gotta think here: in what calculus-related scenario have x4 and x3 related together?
oh fuck me
Im not seeing you connecting what could plausibly work here
so much for a "never heard of anything like that"
and next time, type ^s to notate powers instead of placing the numbers and letters next to each other like multiplication
mybrotherinchrist
doyouthinksavingspacewillsavetimeonreading?
itsshorterbutthatsnothowthatworks
aight
no
thank you
anything strung together is always multiplication
in typing
a4 is a common formatting error you get when you improperly copy-pasting math
so if you read it as a^4, thats expected, but heavily not recommended
then now's your chance to know how youre supposed to properly type math with a keyboard
ok ill change
what else am i supposed to do
not say that
okay
lmao take it easy
gotta put some manners into this guy is all, no hard feelings
alr bro you do you
realistically the only real scenario you can do this is if youre working with polynomials only, so theres no room for error like here
Closed by @jolly ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If x belongs to A and x belongs to B then A is subset of B
e.g. let A = (x, y, z) and B = {x,y}
How
<@&286206848099549185>
?
A isn’t even a set here
And if an element is simultaneously in both sets then that does not imply one or the other is a subset of the other..
@upbeat haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Multiple choice question
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
are there any of these that you can eliminate right away?
Okay, see
Let's work through the options
Ok
Don't you think working with option D is a good idea?
Hint:find roots of second equation
Yup ig so
Now iam not gonna tell more
How to find the common root
See first find det of second equation
you know about Quadratic formula right?
,w calculate 4^2-(4x1x5)
So det. Of second equation is -ve
This means it has ______ roots
Fill in the blank sun flour
Yes
@candid thunder
Imaginary
Yes
oopailol I thought you were not going to say more
And imaginary roots occur in _______
I calculated the roots are -2 +/- i
Lol
Idk
Pair
Ohh ya
If coefficients are real
I remember
And here they are real
1 4 5
So this means
That if the first equation has one root common with 2nd
This should mean what tell me?
It will be the same as the second one
How to check option C??
Cause it's mcq
Both equations have same roots
Both option c and d are correct options
Does that not mean that both the equations can be same
They will be on same ratio
Then the ratio of their coefficients is same
Since both roots are common, the ratio of coefficients of variables will be same
Yes
The coefficients will be in ratio
Thanks a lot @jagged oracle @eager tinsel
?
Welcome
To her
Ty


