#help-33
1 messages · Page 140 of 1
so do i just use the value x = -2?
from the quadratic of course
alr i got it
thanks for the help
.solved
Closed by @austere wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have you tried
where did you get these questions from in the first place
@stone summit Has your question been resolved?
@stone summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help with a combination question
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
So I want to find the number of combinations to reach a sum of 10 with integers 1-9
I get 2^9-1
Minus 1 because I want to sum at least 2 numbers
Yes I know that
Say I want the number of combinations for the above with a new condition
Where I cannot repeat the numbers summed
how did you get this
the problem is unclear to me
so
1+2+3+4 is allowed
but
1+1+1+1+1+5 is not allowed
Yes
why is 1+1+1+1+1+5 not allowed?
.
Okay so I got 2^9
2^9 seems way too high
again, how did you get that
2^9 is 512 which seems like a lot
is the answer not just 9?
,w expand \prod_{i=1}^9 (1+x^i)
ummm... wtf?
but then you use multiple numbers, no?
are permutations allowed or not?
Combinations
is this a sudoku question?
Uh no it’s me trying to figure out an Olympiad question
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
{1,2,3…2000} find the total amount of subsets whose sum is divisible by 5
But like I don’t just want someone to tell me the answer yk
So I’m guessing ish through my way
I would just do cases 💀
Case 1: Two Integers
9 + 1 = 10
8 + 2 = 10 ....
Case 2: Three Integers
7 + 2 + 1 = 10
...
thats a wildly different question
I understand but the number can go up to 2000
In the original question I want to solve
you should reduce the numbers in {1,2,3…2000} mod 5
and see how many of each residue there are
3Blue1Brown covered this in a video :D
Yes I just don’t wanna look 😅
Hm
this is why i was asking if this a sudoku question, in killer sudoku you need to use unique numbers that sum to a certain value
Any thoughts I’ll listen just please don’t leak the answer aha
like throwing 1 into a subset and throwing 6 into a subset does ”the same thing” for the value of the sum of the set mod 5
so you only need to care about the values of the elements in the set mod 5
I’ll look into that thank you
https://projecteuler.net/problem=250 see also 🙃
A website dedicated to the fascinating world of mathematics and programming
My temptation to just type up a program to do it haha >::C
hmmmmm
I think this can get pretty messy and hard to deal with
bc you'll get sets of numbers of different resides
like
{7, 3 1}, { 8, 4, 2} but then also
{1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8}
what?
I'm just saying idk how reducing by mod 5 will help? 😭
:hmmge:
well my idea was to do it with dynamic programming but that’s probably not acceptable
the reducing mod 5 thing makes bookkeeping easier
!!
ahhh, in that case, that would probably be my first choice too!
it would be like… keep track of how many subsets for each residue mod 5 there are, starting with just 1 element available to use, and make one more element available in each dp step
on second thought this may not make bookkeeping any easier
Step 1:
2000/ 5 = 400
so 4000 numbers in [0], [1], [2], [3], [4].
Step 2:
subsets of size 1:
400 choices -- all elements of [0]
subset of size 2:
- 400 C 2
- [1] + [4] = [0], thus 400*400
- [2] + [3] = [0], thus 400*400
- (I think that's it)?
subset of size 3:
- 400 choose 3
- uhhhhhhhh
not what i had in mind
@willow vault Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @willow vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
start with
S = {1}
dp = [1,1,0,0,0]
where dp[i] represents the number of subsets of S with sum i mod 5
now imagine we wanted dp for S = {1,2}. we just keep the old subsets and also get new ones by adding in the element 2 to them
and we only need to keep track of the sums of the subsets mod 5, not the actual subsets
and we can repeat this adding 3, 4, etc to S
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if gcd(a,b)=1; c|a+b then prove gcd(a,c)=gcd(b,c)=1
so to start $a+b=ck$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
looks like you'll need ||Bezout's lemma||
Didn't we do this earlier
i haven't marked it as done in my book, so idts
or a proof by contradiction?
Hmm want to do it again?
yeah, sure
(a,b)=(a+b,b)=(c,b)=1
right
why is (a+b,b)=(c,b)?
I think you mean to say (c,b) | (a+b, b)
c|a+b
I mean that also works
it doesn't just work, that's the only thing you can conclude directly
Sure you are right
you can't say (c,b)=(a+b, b) just because c|a+b
so how would I use bézout's lemma here?
Wai I'll help you with NT when I gitgud
let $ax+by=1$
kheerii
yup
kheerii
mhm
$b(y-x)+c(kx)=1$
kheerii
let $y-x=k_1, kx=k_2$ where $k_1, k_2\in\mathbb{Z}$
kheerii
doesn't this imply ck-b and b are coprime ?
oh yeah also state that $x,y,c\in\mathbb{Z}$ somewhere here
kheerii
does it?
okay yeah you're right
but
that's not what you're after
ck-b is just a, so you just restated your original thing
ah right
so this gives you $k_1b+k_2c=1$
kheerii
yes
a symmetric proof works for (a, c)=1
yeah, makes sense
you can remember that $(a,b)=\text{min}{ax+by: x,y\in\mathbb{Z}, ax+by>0}$
kheerii
Closed by @novel juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i graph something if theres no x-intercepts but i know the max/min points?
im confused
did you find the vertex
you could still graph it by just knowing the vertex and y-int
in the previous problem
thats like the same as this one, just differnt numbers
they only asked me to find x intercepts
and the max/min
and i was able to graph it
but this problem it doesnt ask me to find vertex
so im not sure, do i need to do extra work outside the problem?
usually the problem has all the steps to graph
does it say you have to graph it?
you could do this in your head
you don't need to show it
whats the vertex form?
y=a( x − h ) 2 + k
do you know completing the square?
yes
did you teacher not taught you how to convert a standard form to vertex form
you should do this to get this
ok
i got it
im doing antoher problem rn but ill comer back to it
thank you for th ehelp
no problem
.close
Closed by @rocky steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the sum of this series
Convergence test?
No like find the value it’s supposed to be pi^3/32
Is there a way this can be connected to a special function like the digamma function or gamma function
Fourier ?
I don’t mind a Fourier series but I don’t know much about it other than you have to find the right function on some interval
@dull sable Has your question been resolved?
I think this paper might related to what you are doing https://www.ams.org/journals/qam/2018-76-03/S0033-569X-2018-01499-3/S0033-569X-2018-01499-3.pdf
and there is a nice discussion here https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/359667/sum-sum-n-0-infty-frac-1n2n13
@dull sable Has your question been resolved?
I guess for now I’ll have to remember that sum as pi^3/32 , I did see in that link you can use residues but I only know residues theorem for integrals not how it applies to an infinite series
yeah... it is quite a common one, actually. There is no quick way to derive that
@dull sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dull sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you check my work and answers please
||Chain rule||
For the first part
@misty oyster Has your question been resolved?
that's the same answer i got, but with the parts in parentheses in a different order
are you saying i need to show more steps?
Why is x² multiplying everything
Is it required?
for which question? 1,2, or 3?
nope, it doesn't earn any extra points
Sorry I have to gts
😴
make g(x) a function of i(x)
h(x)=f(x)xg(i(x))
@misty oyster Has your question been resolved?
yo which question
3?
@misty oyster
@misty oyster Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am in calculus 1 and trying to learn how to create a graph of a function but I feel like I don't have enough information so I can't make sense of it. How can f(3) = 5 but the limit as x ->3 of f(x) != 5 at the same time and how would I graph that?
you can make a function defined piecewise, for example: [ f(x) = \begin{cases} \frac 2x & x \ne 3 \ 5 & x = 3 \end{cases} ]
cloud
then you would make a hollow circle at the place the function "should be" (the limit) and make a solid circle at the value of the function
for full context these are the conditions:
lim x-> 0- f(x) and lim x-> 0+ f(x) are infinite
f(3) = 5, but ;im x -> 3 f(x) !=5
lim x -> -3- f(x) != lim x-> -3+ f(x)
wouldnt the circle be in the same location though? How do I make a hollow and a solid circle both at (3,5)
I don't understand how I am supposed ot know that. I feel like I dont have enough information
do I just put it literally anywhere else?
you're free to make the limit anything as long as it isn't 5
So the only thing I know for sure is there is a vertical asymptote at x=0
the second rule tells me there is a solid point disconnected from the function where f(3) = 5 and then I can make a hollow point at basically any value other than 5 for the limit of f(x)
so so far I am looking at something like this
yes, then the hollow point is the one that the graph should pass through
oh oops right I mixed it up
so then for the last part lim x -> -3- f(x) != lim x-> -3+ f(x)
do I just pick any 2 values that are different at x=-3?
like would this work?
@mortal lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mortal lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to prove the fundamental theorem of Algebra (for fun). Specifically what I'm trying to prove is that the polynomial $$P(z)=a_nz^n+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+...+a_0$$ with $a_i\in\mathbb{C}, a_n\ne 0$ can be factorised as $$P(z)=a_n(z-z_1)(z-z_2)...(z-z_n)$$ with $z_i\in\mathbb{C}$
kheerii
I realised that I only need to prove that P(z) has at least one root, after which I can prove that that factorisation must exist using the factor theorem and strong induction
|p(Z)|>0
actually, before I continue
do you want me to just give you the method
or are you trying some things
no, maybe some sort of hint
we need to prove that g(z) has a root
its fairly unintuitive imo
heres the first 2 steps without any work as a hint
there are certainly other better methods to prving this btw, this is just what I know using CA
hmm
I think even if I give you all the steps, its still some working out to do
incase i go away
open this if u want later
can we write $p(z)=c+a_r(z-z_0)^r+a_{r+1}(z-z_0)^{r+1}+...+a_n(z-z_0)^n$
kheerii
Closed by @lucid zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
69
a=a/2+a/2
b=b/3+b/3+b/3
C=c/4+c/4+c/4+c/4
a+b+c/9 >= (a^2b^3c^4/(4^5×3^3)
2^9 4^5 3^3>=(a^2b^3c^4)
First, let’s clarify a,b,c > 0
Yes
@valid hinge Has your question been resolved?
Why?
No problem, we can do your way too. Give me a moment
Yes sir
So you have this (a/2+a/2+b/3…+c/4)/9 >= ((a^2b^3c^4)/(2^2 + * 3^3 * 4^4))^(1/9)
Numerator is 18
18/9 = 2
2 >= right side
Can u continue from here?
Ok so
...
Yes right
What do u get
6^3
2^4 is 4^2
And 4^5 * 2^2 how much is it?
Start by making 4^5 in base 2
Then multiply and then let raised another base to 4
U mean (2)?
Yes
Yes thats correct 4^5 is 2^10 and 2^10 * 2*2 is 2^12, which is (2^3)^4 = 8^4
.close
Closed by @valid hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
They have utilized a manipulation of the AM-GM inequality
Like how?
Look up the AM-GM inequality
I have solved the whole question with am gm
I am looking for another method which they intrduced
@ivory sundial
The AM-GM inequality has equality when all terms are equal, hence its minimized when they are equal
I see
You should always look for using these inequalities instead of calculus in questions like this
a+b+c=18
I'm sure you could use vector calculus here but it would be so lengthy
lagrange multipliers moment
Yes
But i will not do that because it is competitive exam
What should I next?
Help
.close
Closed by @valid hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why
why
4c^3 + 7c^5 is 11c^8 sorry
?
Is the ans 11c^8 d^5
The answer to what, i don’tsee any question
no
.
That is not a question
That is a picture of a product and you should say what you want to do with that
What would it be
For example expand
What do you do when you have a product?
$4\cdot7\cdotc^3c^5d^5$
Skill_Issue
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Of 2 bases with different exponents
Add
Is it 4x7 because of the ()()
C^8 d^5
Ty
What happens with 7 * 4?
Why is it multiplication instead of addition
What
When u have a number close to a variable you multiply them
Oh
For example 4c^3 means 4 * c^3
This * means multiply
So (4c^3d^5)(7c^5) means 4 * c^3 * d^5 * 7 * c^5
And here you use commutative property to multiply
4 * 7 = 28
.close
Closed by @golden pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
using euclid's algorithm obtain integers (x,y) satisfying the following
Right
You will gave to use the process of algo
Did you got it
You "work backwards" through euclid substituting jnto the equation above
let me try
or say the numbers are small and notice they're easily found by hand (||91-90||)
could you elaborate ?
the steps are
Write your process of euclid
72=56+16
56=48+8
48=6*8
Yea
Youre better off watching a vid of.someone doing it
Now sub a and b at the place of 72 and 56
ok
instead of telling me the steps, could you give me a hint, like what'
what's the idea here
You gotta see it once
16 = 72-56
8 = 56-3*16
So 8 = 56 - 3*(72-56)
= 4*56 - 3*72
and you keep subsituting
making bigger numbers and distributing at each step
reading the gcd computation backwards
it's much easier to see than to convey
if you think you understood, just try with other numbers, there's infinitely many practice examples for this
Closed by @novel juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,, \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = \frac{1}{x+p+q} solve for x
CrazyGamer547
you can move everything to the left
then find lcd
then multiply everything with it
then set the numerator equal to 0
factor and then you will have a quadratic equation
and by using the quadratic formula you can find the solutions
yeah
your textbook answers are correct btw
its just a very long and tedious process to do
if i move everything to the left, the lcd will be (x)(p)(q)(x+p+q) ???
oh
its because the lcd will be (pqx)(x+p+q) and then for the quadratic equation a= q+p , b- 2qp+q^2+p^2 and c=qp^2+pq^2
the methodology is quite simple but the process of doing everything correct is the hard part
CrazyGamer547
yeah pretty sure its correct
so now just simplify?
remove the parentheses
and then remove the opposites and collect like terms
and then factor everything and then identify the coefficients of the quadratic equation
CrazyGamer547
yeah
yeah since the answers are -q and -p you can factorize it
the discriminant will factorize to $(p^2-q^2)^2$
Miliski
oh
it will be way easier with the quadratic formula in my opinion
ohk
btw i can remove (p+q) right
cuz all 3 terms hv it
divide the whole thing
so
you dont know if p+q is zero or not
just do the last parentheses here
so i expand $(p+q)^2$ and then use quadratic formula?
CrazyGamer547
Miliski
oh
and then identify the coefficients of the quadratic equation
CrazyGamer547
,, = (p^2 + q^2 + 2pq)^2 - 4(p^3q + pq^3 + 2p^2q^2)
CrazyGamer547
how do i take the root of this?
you need to expand everything and then do the operations that are possible and then you will be able to factor it
it should factor to $(q^2-p^2)^2$
Miliski
lemme see
so then you can simplify the root with the exponent
what joy does school get with giving these kind of problems to 10th graders 😭
,, ok yeah it simplified to (p^2 - q^2)^2
CrazyGamer547
you can now simplify the root and then just seperate the solutions and find them
np
Closed by @plush blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
AD = AE = BF
Prove that G = 90 degrees
And I figured out that ADE is congruent BCF
But what now
And i know that E = F
But i don't know how much is e or f
something like that
<@&286206848099549185>
Is AD = AE = BF all that was given? I don't see how you arrived at the fact that ADE congruent to BCF.
Did you assume/is it given that ABCD is a paralelogram?
Ah okay
Well, you have that the opposite angles are congruent in ABCD
oh really
And you have a bunch of angles that are equal to each other bc of isosceles triangles and angles opposite to each other like AED and GEF.
mhm
Perhaps start by calling at these angles x, and if you have an angle that you dont have info on, you can call it y, z, ...
alright
Yeah. Do you know Thales Theorem?
no
Ok, nw.
As long as angle A matches angle B is shouldnt matter the other, as they are isosceles triangles.
So like, ADE congruent BFC or ADE congruent BCF
so i got it right?
Yeah, this is right.
Well, say that angle ADE and DEA are x, given that the triangle is isosceles.
alright
If angle A is y, it follows that y + 2x = 180
right
yeah
mhm wait why D = y
Isn't it just 2x?
oh right
yeah
so you called b as y
alright
Give me a moment, go back to this.
alright
mhm i think i solved it @vital forge
C = 2x
A = 2x
2x + x + x = 180
x = 45
Thats the asumption I made, but I made a mistake in the process.
ADE is not congruent to BCF.
I thought the congruent theorem was SS for some reason.
Anyway.
Lets go one-by-one.
alright
We know that ADE is isosceles, so the equal angles we denote them as x and angle A as y such that y + 2x = 180
alright
Similarly, is BCF, we end up with angles a and b such that 2a + b = 180.
yeah
Now, the little trick here is to notice that triangle GEF is congruent to triangle GDC.
Can you see why?
Why is that correct?
Well, the third angle is G itself.
Angle G is in both the triangle GEF and triangle GDC.
And I believe we can agree that angle G = angle G.
Angle GDC equals angle GEF because AB is parallel to CD>
yeah
lol
Well, because these two are congruent, and angle GEF = x, then it follows that GDC is also x.
Now you can see the euqations that I put in the bottom of the paper.
But basically, y + 2x = 180 and b + 2a = 180 bc of angles of a triangle. b = 2x because of opposite angles of a parallelogram.
Substituting back yields 2x + 2a = 180 => x + a = 90.
Now we look at triangle GDC.
In that triangle, we have the relationship G + a + x = 180. Given that a + x = 90, it follows that G is 90 degrees.
wait why a + x = 90
2x + 2a = 180, right?
yeah
If we divide both sides of the euqaiton by 2, it yields x + a = 90
Closed by @pure compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pls help me with this integral
its 4x cube plus 5x squared
factor the bottom then use partial fractions
Closed by @terse dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate 3
Is this a good way to approach this question?
I might have drawn something on wrong
Or this may be completely wrong do I make an equation for the car and the trailer and solve simultaneously
Because I need a, but I have an r in the way
<@&286206848099549185>
@cinder lion Has your question been resolved?
the net force on car is Fe - T -2r = ma
and on trailer is T-r=Ma
Your diagram is corect but your equation arent
What does Fe mean sorry?
Force by engine
So at this point I should exclude the trailer?
And write an equation for the car only
yes for writing equation on car you only see force acting on the car
So it would be like this?
My problem is I don’t have a value for the tension on the trailer
Ohh so when it’s light, the tension is the same
yes for a string having mass the force changes
That’s my answer
Looks right to me
ya mee too
Do you think I could ask you another quick question?
ya sure
I believe I did the first part right
But I’m honestly not sure where to start on part b
And is the displacement allowed to be negative or would I change it to a positive?
as you have taken the upward side possitive the displacement should be possitive
but in the question the total time of particle till it hits the ground is 10sec
thus the time at which the particle reaches the top will be half of that
So it goes up, then down past 0 and then hits the ground
Wait, so I’ve done something wrong there?
no it hits the O at t=10sec
yes
you have taken total time = time of ascent which is wrong
time of ascent = (total time)/2
It says it hits the ground when t=10
Alright
I’m fairly sure I’d need to use two equations but I’m just not sure how
Not my strong point
for 2nd part 1st find when the velocity is equal to 24.5
Alright so I’d just say u=24.5
v=24.5 u=39.2
you will get two times when v=24.5
lets say it to be t1 and t2
now as the particle moves between t1 and t2 you will its speed will always be less than 24.5
as gravitational accelration will pull it down
Oh right yea
then just find the time for which its greater by subtracting
No prob
.close
Closed by @cinder lion
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont rlly understand how they got "n"
How exactly did they get log_10 a + log_10 b for this
how many repeetitions does the program make?
with a given b = n input
repetitions/calculations
@wary bluff Has your question been resolved?
are you talking about the while loop here?
like how many iterations
I think they're defining n, not getting n
n is the number of digits of both numbers.
Bits not digits
shoudnt it be log_2(a) + log_2(b)
Oh, I see the comment defines it as bits
In that case, yes it should be log2, not log10
Not that it makes a difference to the final statement
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
yes
If I drew a graph, would there be a line curing right of the Y axis top right ?
you could leave it as exact number too
ye
Is this correct ?
,w 5=\sqrt{4x-3}
it is
,w (6-5i)/(1-6i)
it looks good
are you doing a test or smth?
It’s a review
Do I need the pro to do it. Or just regular
@winter osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @winter osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I kept getting different answers for 6 and 7, is someone able to look over my work? Thank you
How did you get d=48^2 ?
Wait that doesn’t make sense, I re did it and now I’m getting d= 144 feet
The problem in 6 is that u replaced wrong number
I think I did it completely wrong. I’m getting 144 feet which makes more sense
@calm vessel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
in problem 6, you missed the square root in the 16
remember that the square root is for the whole fraction
Closed by @calm vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi im having trouble figuring how to do this concisely
What have you tried
...
Ok
So there are 6^3 possibilites
216 possibilites
with the highest being 216
How many perfect squares are in 216?
i don't think you can
I'd say that's consice
because you gestured at the solution
the solution would be three times as long
wait what are you suggesting
there's 14 sqaures or something
that doesn't help
So its 14/total
$P(PS) = #PS / \omega$
Max-Cat
$P(PS) = #PS / \omega$
```Compilation error:```! You can't use `macro parameter character #' in math mode.
l.49 $P(PS) = #
PS / \omega$
Sorry, but I'm not programmed to handle this case;
I'll just pretend that you didn't ask for it.
If you're in the wrong mode, you might be able to
return to the right one by typing `I}' or `I$' or `I\par'.
Preview: Tightpage -1310720 -1310720 1310720 1310720
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2023/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}{/usr/l
ocal/texlive/2023/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/lm-mathit.enc}{/usr/local/texli```
you have omega (6^3), now you just need the perfect squares
not, here, ask in a free channel
as, I was saying,
if you had 2 dice you could do a double entrance table, but with three it gets exponentialy more difficult
the Probability of getting a perfect square is the number of possible perfect squares over all the possible outcomes
how did you get 14?
product means multiplication
ok, how many ways can we multiply numbers to get a PS?
and consicely
like, 121 is a square
i get it
how do you multiply 3 numbers to get 121
i have to factor those
you can't, sqrt121 is 11, which is a prime number
i think you count 4 x x and 1 x x and an extra special case
it's concise but also totally guessing
thing is im not even sure if it goes to 216, like the highest square probs isnt 216
ah
i have no idea how to do this
find all of the combs that are sqrts and just over the whole prob
but the sqrts
do i need to just list the combs out
or is there a way or formula that shows it more concisely
it is
6x6x6
thats a cube tho
i suggested a way, there's 18 − 2 combinations that look like 1 x x
i thought the higest would be 4x4x4
6×3 − two repeats of 1 1 1
there 16 more that looks like 4 x x, and there's 3! that look like 2 3 6
is the 6x3 6 x 3!/2?
yea thats the problem
idk if theres a surefire way to get all the combs instead of like this
yea i think this is the most concise its going to get
thanks
.close
Closed by @bitter terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i negate this with the negation symbol and without it?
@rugged gust Has your question been resolved?
@rugged gust Hey. What are we doing here?
trying to negate this
Got it. My tip is to try to negate it step by step, starting from the very left.
ive never seen it where the for every x in the set of real numbers is in the middle of problem though
normally i substitute everything to f(x) and work from there but here im confused
Ah, I see what you normally do. I wouldn't remember "formulas" for negations. Always treat it by parts, it'll be easier.
so is it ¬∃ M > 0 --> f(x)
oh okay
👍
what about that implies at the end there
Yes, for that you treat it as an implication. P implies Q.
And negate it as a whole.
not left and not right
Not quite.
left and not right
Perfect.
so does that turn into left implies f(x) less than or equal to M?
Yes, that's exactly the negation for that implication.
thank you so much
Not a problem.
.close
Closed by @rugged gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What have you tried
i tried to expand the r^2(r-1), which ended up as r^3-r^2, then i split the summations as the sum of r^3 - the sum of r^2
And then?
then, i expressed the sum of r^3 as 1/6(n^2(n+1)^2) and the sum of r^2 as 1/4(n(n+1)(2n+1))
then i subtracted them and tried to factorise but failed
you put the 1/6 and 1/4 in the wrong expressions
ah
so would you end up with this
Perhaps we could factorise that
should i take out n from the polynomial
and then factorise the cubix
Look at this
And think to yourself
There’s an n outside in the answer
Yes, I should factorise an n out
i did factor the n out, but idk if i can factorise it further
i checked on mathway and apparently the expression isn't factorisable with rational numbers
so what should i do with it then?
do you mean i have to set the equation equal to m?
No set it equal to the right hand side here
i'm still stuck
@spice widget Has your question been resolved?
@spice widget Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i was actually trying to diffrenciate data type values between integer and float, i.e. 5 and 5.0, and gpt helped this with using epsilon value , so for variable b = 5.0, b - int of b (type casted) is less than a epsilon value than its integer else float. so my question is that 5.0 is bigger than 5 if epsilon take in account to compare?
you are taking the absolute value of the difference
so it doesnt matter whether b or (int)b is bigger
moreover, 5.0 happens to be exactly 5.0 when represented as a float!
https://www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/IEEE754.html this is a handy tool
i don't understand what you're asking
it's the only way what do you mean
well there could be lots of situations where you might want to check whether a number is an integer
curiosity
just type things properly
what
this isn't gonna work well if b is something like 4.9999999
you might have intermediate results for which you need to use floats
const double tol = 1e-6;
const double remainder = fmod(some_num, 1.0);
if (remainder > 1.0 - tol || remainder < tol) {
// close enough
}
I'm struggling to come up with a convincing example where this can't just be attributed to bad programming
so the absolute diff i.e. 0.0 is less than epsilon value
Yeah, so 5.0 is an integer
Kind of makes sense 😂
Because computer use binary systems so it can't represent some numbers exactly. That is why b - int(b) doesn't always equal 0 so we need to compare it to a small number epsilon
i see
The common case is 0.1 + 0.2 = 0.3000000000004 😂
thats actually helpful thnx
Do you still have any questions or nah
im done , thnx for the help :>
Closed by @idle ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a mistake in this?
Didn't this person mean AA' not unit matrix?
Wikipedia gives me
Probably yes
Actually I'm confused, what does ' mean?
Does it mean transpose or conjugate transpose?
It should just mean transpose, the person wrote $\overline A'$ for the hermitian condition, so that should mean conjugate transpose
Kepe
Ok so you also agree with the German Wikipedia article and not what the person wrote
Thanks
.close
Closed by @open kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it doesn't make sense then, AA' = I for an orthogonal matrix, not unitary
.reopen
✅
That was never claimed..?
Everything is correct just not the second line I think, no?
It should say "AA' \neq E so not unitary"
First and last line seem fine?
It should be a conjugate transpose.
Closed by @open kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question. how would you solve this question. A man walked 440 m [50.0° N of E] and then 580 m [5.0° S of W]. The entire trip took 150.0 min. whats his displacment.
