#help-33
1 messages · Page 138 of 1
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given a function $f: \mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{R}, f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z^2$ and an $a\in\mathbb{R}\setminus{0}$
Show that $f^{-1}(a)$ is a $C^\infty$ submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^3$ with dimension 2.
How would I even begin to prove something like this?
Bob Goldham
I understand why it'd be 2dimensional I think? As soon as we fix 2 of {x,y,z} the third one is then determined by our value of a, so we really only have 2 "degrees of freedom"
How do I show that we're even dealing with a submanifold at all, let alone that it is C^infty
@earnest sundial Has your question been resolved?
inserting numbers from the definition we use gives me a definition along the lines of
Hm
A subset $M\subseteq \mathbb{R}^3$ is called a 2dimensional $C^\infty$ submanifold if for any $p\in M$ there exists an open neighborhood $V\subseteq \mathbb{R}^3$, an open subset $U\subseteq\mathbb{R}^2$ and a $C^\infty$ immersion $F: U\to \mathbb{R}^3$, which homeomorphically maps U onto the open subset $F(U)=(V\cap M)$ of $M$.
How would I prove any of that
Bob Goldham
this is basically a verbatim copy of how we defined a submanifold
with the 2, 3 and infinity plugged into the relevant places
... can we just apply the implicit function theorem here?
I actually don't understand why it's necessarily 2d anymore
fix x and y
you then get z²= x²+y²-a
which for fixed x,y has 2 real solutions z
couldn't we be dealing with 2 parallel planes?
nvm we're dealing with dimensions of manifolds, it "behaves like a 2dimensional space around any point a" because we'd have to "jump" to get to the "second plane" even if it existed
okay I understand that part again
@earnest sundial Has your question been resolved?
@earnest sundial haven't u seen any result about the preimage of a function
being a submanifold?
Someone suggested that the implicit function theorem combined with the fact that the gradient of f is never 0 for any such a should be sufficient to prove this, but I don't really see how.
Is that at all correct?
If u want an abstract way of why f^-1(a) being a 2 dimensionnal submanifold makes sense, we could tell that in a given neighborhood of any point of M, the function behaves like it's total derivative, which is a linear map from R^3 -> R which has rank 1 everywhere excepted in (0,0,0). Therefore f^-1(a) is equivalent to the 'kernel' of this map which has dimension 2
This is actually True but it's not that easy to show i think
isn't that true for any function by definition of what a total derivative is?
Intuitively yes , but u need to make assomptions on the regularity of the function in order to get cool results
U should actually take a look at the constant rank theorem
This is the key theorem to prove this result
With that, i feel like u should be able to prove it, but without this theorem, good luck ah ah
isn't that just the implicit function theorem in more general terms?
I don't think we've covered the constant rank theorem, but according to Wikipedia "The inverse function theorem (and the implicit function theorem) can be seen as a special case of the constant rank theorem, which states that a smooth map with constant rank near a point can be put in a particular normal form near that point."
So I'd assume the IFT is just the special case we care about here?
I don't remember exactly the proof given in my course but it seemed to me that we did use the constant rank theorem and not the IFT
Let me check
also is the gradient being non-zero just required so that an inverse exists for purposes of the implicit function or is there some sort of deeper reasoning to it?
well if you can prove it using IFT, then you can definitely also prove it using a generalization of that
Oh okay my bad, i just realised that in my course, we did not use the same definition of a manyfold, we used a more restrictive one, which explains why we needed the constant rank theorem
Sorry
No i would say this is the main reason to it's use given your definition
so would it be correct to assume that "if the IFT applies we're always dealing with a C^infinity manifold"?
@earnest sundial Has your question been resolved?
@earnest sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with the fundamentals of TQF, I'm confused on how this equation under the root becomes positive
what does -4 * -4.9 equal to?
19.6
sorry C is meant to be negative
@vernal forge
so you end up getting -2352
and then 8^2 + -2352 is -2288
wait waita iwat
are u solving a quadratic?
C?
im doing a physics problem involving TQF
yes
i know how to get the right answer, its just the essence of it confuses me
how does this equation end up becoming positive
i dont understand the logic
the answer under the square is 2416
show the equation
-4.9x^2+8x-120
is it equal to 0
yes
it doesn't
but it does
it is -2288 under the square roor which means there are no solutions
then the resource you are following has a typo somewhere
that would be the case for +120, not -120
i think i see where i went wrong
@fickle compass was right
i made the equation so
0 = ax^2+bx+c
instead of ax^2+bx+c=0
i think that might've done it
okay hold up
@fickle compass @vernal forge are you guys familiar with kinematikcs
kinematics*
kinda
i can just send the problem here so its easier for you to understand what im saying
yeah thats beter
im using TQF to solve for time
A helicopter is ascending vertically with a speed of 8.0 m/s; at a height of 120 m above the earth, a
package is dropped from a window. How much time does it take for the package to reach the
ground? [5.8s]
5.8 seconds is right and it is one of the answers i get when the equation under the root is equal to 2416
ok wait
what kinematical eq did u use
@fickle compass
in the way i did it; your quadratic equation ends up being -4.9t^2+8t-120
i even consulted chatgpt on ts and it got the same answer as my answer key
no, 4.9t^2 can't be positive because its negative acceleration
wouldnt vt be negative
no, v1 is positive because the helicopter is initially moving upwards at 8m/s
if you use the equation i gave you
you'll get the same thing as me
do you wanna work it out and tell me what you get
if ur up for it
because 5.8 seconds is the answer
u said u got root2416 in one of the answers right>?
then isnt that the answer
oh
this should be negative
but im missing something clearly because it isnt
like its just my understanding of TQF thats causing the issue
maybe the q is wrong?
q?
there might be some wrong sign conventions
cuz the roots cant be imaginary
s is obv positive
u is also positive
aka v1
and g is negative
yea
so this is what im confused ab
where am i going wrong
if you organize it with that motion equation you'll get the same answer i did @fickle compass
dawg what
what i did to get a positive answer
is i just did
64 - (-2416)
or sorry
-2352**
so 64 - (-2352)
because i was thinking that the -4 within TQF was still constant and needed to be applied to the equation
@fickle compass
how is a simple kinematics eq so tuff dang ;-;
its just the quadratic formula bro
worst thing ever made
like theoretically i could just plug 5.8 or whatever numbers i get out of tqf into another motion equation to see if it gives me the same value as a variable i already have to begin with
but im just so lost with how TQF works in this, because it shouldn't
<@&286206848099549185>
if any of you guys are familiar with physics could you please help me?
im really stumped on this
with what ?
i appreciate the help tho
this ?
Image
A helicopter is ascending vertically with a speed of 8.0 m/s; at a height of 120 m above the earth, a
package is dropped from a window. How much time does it take for the package to reach the
ground? [5.8s]
bruh i didnt send correctly
this q
ahh makes sence
wait this is really ez ?
its not
isnt this like o levels ?
because TQF works so weirdly with this
pardon ? whats the TQF
you need to use TQF to solve for time
quadratic formula
hmm in my country its diff
you mean -b + or minus ?
or the basic one
where you factorise ?
@still temple
isnt that wrong ?
this is what your equation should look like under the root
but i just dont understand because that equation under the root
lemme do it by myself
gives you a negative
yeah
but it always gives u two answers
the answer which is positive
is the right one ?
but i tried it another way where i did 64 - (-2352) and i got the correct answer
yeah
are they both negative
the number under the square should = 2416
so u js miscounted ?
no
ight lemme work from where u told me to go
if you can i would just work out the problem
i can send you the equation that i used
@still temple
is it this ? Where a = 4.9 , b = -8.0 , and c = -120 .
ight ill do it quite quickly then
because the velocity is upwards
b is positive
@still temple make sure you consider b to be positive
its v1
yeah i get it
mate
:/
i got the correct answer
there are 2 possibilities
5.83
yes
or -4.2
i know
so b was positive ?
yes
hmm ok
because v1t is = to 8(t)
let me work around it rq
1/2(a)(t)^2 is = -4.9
because a is -9.8
yes
but
wouldnt
it be (-9.8)t to the power of 2 ?
that means the t would be positive
:/
that would mean t^2 is 96.04
you dont square -9.8
so the formulae u have at this point should be $ -120 = 8.0 t + \frac{1}{2} (-9.8) t^2$
oops made a gap
mb
$-120 = 8.0 t + \frac{1}{2} (-9.8) t^2$
Exornion
why is your d negative
but mate
the helicopter isnt underground
hol up yeah your right
16 year old or 17 year old ?
16
there is 17-18 which is a level
gr11 physics
I have a 10th grade entrance exam and i cant find this question on google, can anyone help?
ahh makes sence
open up another forum
wha, how?
okay but do you understand the issue that im getting at
not in this chat pls go to #help-1
wait lemme try to explain why the displacement is negative
thank you
its dropped
np
dude
i was boutta paste this
ong
us physicists keep messing up our plusses and minuses
i hate when teachers dont give extra context like this
ong
its so bad
it was hidden
bcz it says it was "dropped" i noticed it bcz ive been doing this for so long
these questions are literally meant to trick you into giving a wrong answer
for an average student it would be rly hard
yea just memory
this is exam review
from our first unit
yeh
A helicopter is ascending vertically with a speed of 8.0 m/s; at a height of 120 m above the earth, a
package is dropped from a window. How much time does it take for the package to reach the
ground? [5.8s]
tbh tho
this isnt the type of question
you get
in the exam
its alot simpler
idfk why you all got this
i already know that theres a question that involves TQF
yeah but not with hidden clauses
every time you have to find time in one of these problems you need TQF
its very VERY rare
to be honest id rather be overprepared than underprepared
this review is forcing me to read super carefully
i suppose so
theres so many really weird trick questions
js dont waste too much time on overdoing yourself
the examns require a lot of other stuff as well
thats true
i didnt understand potential and kinetic energy well
i hated energy
did you ever get a roller coaster
oof
question
i had one like that on a test and it was just purely deriving one formula
and it was so confusing
;-;
thanks for the help @still temple
Closed by @wary hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I approach this
TheRuleOfEngineering
idk where to go from there
do you know the specific points for triangle ABC, or are we assuming it's some generic (a, b, c)?
surprisingly the normal vector is one thing you don't need
oh
anything is appreciated
the idea was to draw a line from the origin through the three vertices of the triangle to their respective intersections with the plane
something about scaling the vector (a,b,c) to get the points on the plane
so something like p * (a,b,c), then x = pa, y = pb, z = pc
so if A = (a,b,c)
then we have the vector <a,b,c> going from the origin through A through the projection of A
i see
then since x + 7z + z = 32, p(a + 7b + c) = 32 so p = 32 / (a + 7b + c)
but then you want (x,y,z) which you know is (pa, pb, pc)
and you just found an expression for p
in terms of only a, b, and c
but i think there might be something wrong with this approach, i don't feel too confident
so 32a/(a+b+c) and so on
well its something to start so ill look into it
32a / (a + 7b + c), and so on
yeah mb 7b
hope that helps but i honestly haven't seen this kind of problem before
me either
this couse was all about double and triple integrals
and somehow im here now
and i think there might be an assumption there about the vertices being equidistant from the light and about the plane being oriented parallel to the triangle
ok so your approach IS promising
we land at
$\bar A = (\frac{32a}{a+7b+c}, \frac{32b}{a+7b+c}, \frac{32c}{a+7b+c})$
TheRuleOfEngineering
theres no "one correct answer" for this i think
because how
just random values of a,b,c that match a+7b+c=32
one such set could be 2,4,2
wait no
TheRuleOfEngineering
so $t = \frac {32}{x_0+7y_0+z_0}$
yeah idk
@exotic marsh Has your question been resolved?
@exotic marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was doing an exercise with radicans and ran into a curious scenario i think im just being silly but.
we have an exercise:
$5\sqrt{2}*\left( \frac{\sqrt{ 2 }}{2} \right)$
Now nothing special here really.
I solved the problem with 2 methods.
but the first method makes me quesiton my understanding even if i got the right answer.
method 1. (something fishy here)
$5\sqrt{2}*\left( \frac{\sqrt{ 2 }}{2} \right)$
Combine the terms:
$\frac{5\sqrt{ 2 }\sqrt{ 2 }}{2}$
Since $\sqrt{ a }\sqrt{ a }=a$
$\frac{52}{2}= 5$
**Here is my question **
if $5\sqrt 2$ can be written as
$(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })*(\sqrt{ 2 })$
we have a curious case since this is equal to 8 not 10.
and thus the previous example should give answer = 4
I got a second more reliable method of calculating this but im just wondering is there some radical rule im missing here or is it simply fundamentally wrong?
HydroH
Sorry for the horrible syntax
$5\sqrt 2$ can’t be written as
$(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })(\sqrt{ 2 })*(\sqrt{ 2 })$
smaysurable set
yea because the last sqrt 2 cant be interpeted as 6\sqrt 2 i think i just realised this...?
smaysurable set
yea pardon the extra was related to the exercise
with the correct number of sqrt 2’s
like the exercise is just fine
the beginning part is indeed correct and has correct reasoning
what we can say about $5\sqrt2$ is that it’s $\sqrt2+\hdots\sqrt2$
smaysurable set
it won’t be multiplication of 5 sqrt 2’s together
oh
which can’t really be simplified as much
as you might have suspected
or maybe not, which is also fine
sqrt 2 / 2 can be simplified to 1 / sqrt 2
that as well
so just to be clear since $5\sqrt{ 2}=\sqrt{ 2}+\sqrt{ 2}+\sqrt{ 2}+\sqrt{ 2}+\sqrt{ 2}$
the radican rule $\sqrt{ a }\sqrt{ a }=a$ wont be applicable
HydroH
what the sigma 💀
it will after you distribute out the product over the addition
sorry for the brainrot
i dont understand
but you can just leave it as $5\sqrt 2$
smaysurable set
and trust that it works out if you wanted
let sqrt(2) be equal to x
now 5*sqrt(2) = 5x
you can also write 5x as x+x+x+x+x AND NOT AS 5*5*5*5*5
its not your fault tho i too do silly stuff like this when im brain fatigued
Bro wrote it before me
Couldve told me to not waste time
idk i just saw a silly porblem and wrote a silly answer
i guess he got confused due to the root sign so i simplified it into a variable
I love you (platonically)
i love you too bro (platonically)
5 x 6 = 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6
Sinilarly
5 x sqrt 2 = sqrt 2 + sqrt 2 + sqrt 2 + sqrt 2 + sqrt 2
the computation to show that it work either way is to EITHER: do it the way you did in your image (which was perfectly acceptable) or write out
$$
(\sqrt2+\hdots+\sqrt2)(\frac\sqrt22)= \frac{\sqrt2\sqrt2}2+\hdots+\frac{\sqrt2\sqrt2}2= 1+\hdots +1$$
smaysurable set
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Closed by @mighty pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im having problems understanding whats being done in this table
i can send full question if needed, its using euclidean algorithm to work out gcd
Its finding the GCD
Hope this helped
i know it is lol
thats not what im confused about
ij ust dont understand whats actually going on in that table
do you have a screenshot of the sequence of remainders in regular order
i htought it was just, i take the 1 sub it in, 2nd line is 6 and i just keep feeding in each number and getting new result
but then i scrolled down adn thats not how you do it
so im kinda confused
dont know what you mean by that and I dont see a 6 anywhere
youre trying to look for two amounts of m and n where adding 324m + 149n is 1
in other words youre trying to see how many 324s and 149s you add/subtract to get 1
ohhh wait
so the last number is just whatever u multiply the other number by so it equals 1
i think i get it now okay
thank you
np
@tough monolith Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tough monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi! Can someone walk me through this quesiton please
tan2x + tanx = 0 for 0<=x<=180
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
hmmm..
Use tan=sin/cos and double angle identity?
maybe try considering a right angle triangle and draw a angle bisector
the question shouldnt need that
sorry you want the (2tanX)/(1-tan^2X)
identity/
?
i did that andit gets me nowhere
I would analyze the function tan(x) + tan(2x) in each of those 4 intervals :
0° <= x < 45°
45° < x < 90°
and so on
(assuming 180 means 180 degrees above)
And you should be able to deal with each parts, for example, between 0 and 45 degrees, the function is strictly increasing
what do you mean by analyse
Is it increasing? decreasing?
in the first part its positive
like you mean using a graphing calculator?
oh by logic ok
you already know how does the function tan behave, right?
bit foggy but yeah
0 and 45 its increasing and +ve
45 to 90 its increasing gbut -ve
What is the value of tan(x) + tan(2x) when x approaches 90° from below? for example, when x = 89.99°
infinity?
Yes
And what about when x is just above 45°?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
45 to 90 is increasing but +ve
0 to 45 is decreasing but +ve
negative
No, it is wrong
Between 0 and 45 degrees, the function is also increasing
oh
Correct
For example, between 0 and 45 degrees
tan(0) + tan(2*0) = 0
and f(x) = tan(x) + tan(2x) is strictly increasing
meaning there is only one solution in the interval [0, 45 degrees[
Now in the interval ]45 degrees, 90 degrees[, it is strictly increasing, and it approaches -infinity close of 45, and approaches +infinity close of 90
Meaning there must be one (and only one) solution
This is called the intermediate value theorem, it is quite an intuitive result
This should work
for equations involving trigonometric functions, you should always look for a possible substitution to make your life easier
Closed by @past sequoia
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question, are the value wrong or am I doing it wrong?
blue and red lines are the tangents
those two points are where they are supposed to touch the parabola
no such parabola can ever exist?
It doesn't want you to find lines tangent to that parabola, it only tells you that the slope of said parabola at 3,2 and 2,3 are 31 and 14. So you know the derivative there is equal to those
that'll help you find the constants
Thank u
But but when you eliminate the constants
the parabola you find doesnt even satisfy the two points
(3,2) and (2,3)?
Idk if the question is wrong
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
iss thiss all good or im missing something?
,rotate
@worthy obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My answer is not close to the mark scheme, they have different measurements on the lengths of the triangles. Have I done something stupid?
@cinder lion Has your question been resolved?
@cinder lion Has your question been resolved?
@cinder lion Has your question been resolved?
Bruh just use quadratic equation
I already did xd
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
https://gyazo.com/242191f13b41bb8fc5fad8b860c5567c how is csc not negative as well also how is tan and cot wrong?
Csc is 1/sin(x) right
yes
The way you visualize the angle is wrong
Remember that theta is negative
So you’re doing a negative rotation
omg
2 pi is 8pi/4 lol
not your fault
wait 3 rotations?
It’s 3 half rotations
NEGATIVE rotations
And a negative pi/4 rotation
np
@tranquil sparrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
tangent
toa
no info on hypotenuse
so
tan 18 = x/12
x is on top so we multiple
so x = 12 tan 18
but I get a negative
Make sure your calculator is in degrees
on that calculator Idk
I tried doing this
on my phone calculator
but
I do 12
the tan
and it calculates tan 12
doesn't let me finish the euation on phone
ok
and then multiply by 12
3.9
Looks good 👍 Maybe 3.90 since it says two decimal places
ok
but yeah that's right
np 👍
.close
Closed by @torpid marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys, this is a question for people familiar with NCERT books and isn't exactly a question about a specific math problem, rather about understanding what the textbook is trying to say. I am currently doing class 9 chapter 2.4 after finishing exercise 2.2, the topic before 2.4 was 2.3, finding zeros of a polynomial, which i understood with no issues, now it starts referring to some example 10 above which hasnt come up yet and also starts talking remainder theorem, which also havent been mentioned yet, and now i am really confused as to what's happening as its just going on about a topic that it expects me to know but it never mentioned up until now. Is this an error on their end or am I just tripping, what can I do about this, thanks. You can see the chapter here: https://ncert.nic.in/textbook.php?iemh1=2-15
@feral scaffold Has your question been resolved?
Looks like they messed up.
This looks like a preview page, so maybe they mixed pages from more than one edition
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do you mean? that is the full chapter from the official website
it isn't a preview
@feral scaffold Has your question been resolved?
B.c. of the watermark
Ok, but it still looks like an error. I couldn't find a reference to example 10 or a q(t) that has a factor 2t+1
Unless it's referring to the previous section...which it should have said if that was the case
I can confirm it is indeed an error on their end
pretty silly from a government organization
but it is what it is
that's there for the online copies, it's still the full textbook though
Gotta make that textbook $$$
Also
The remainder theorem
iirc, it just says that a linear expression divides a polynomial if the remainder is 0
If only there was a quick way for me to be sure...
the chapter doesn't mention anything abt dividing polynomials either
No
they've just removed some major parts from the textbook
I still don't understand 😕
the textbook is just missing pretty important information the topic before this was perfectly fine, it appears they removed some information between these 2 topics without patching it up
but thanks for helping, my peanut brain just can't comprehend this stuff 😂
hopefully this gets resolved
Under division by a binomial (specifically, and more usefully, an expression of the form x-a), a polynomial p(x) has a remainder of p(a)
Here's an example of what that means
so how would you divide a polynomial by a binomial?
Say you have the polynomial
alright
p(x) = x^3 - 4x^2 - 7x + 10
alright
Evaluate this at 2
meaning?
p(2) = -12
ohh
Meaning plug in 2
yep
so p(2)/(2-2)?
We should still get a (constant part) remainder of -12
No
this entire polynomial
divided by (x/2)?
is that right?
Mb I meant x-2
I'm going to use synthetic division b.c. it is fast
alright
If (x-2) had been a factor, the last number would have been 0, but it was -12, so we write it over the divisor x-2
That's good
np
Closed by @feral scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is r/q equal to sin y°?
sin y degrees will be perpendicular/ hypotenuse...
which in this case is r/q
hence, yes r/q is equal to sin y°
@reef trout Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@deft nova Has your question been resolved?
@deft nova Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @deft nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There is someone in the freshman class who doesn’t have a room-mate.
The negation would be everyone in the freshman class has a room mate
is this right?
yes.
hm?
how do you negate statements like this , wwhere multiple intereprtations exist ?
Like I could say there's noone in the freshman class who does have a room mate
oh. I hate those questions
yeah see, it's better to put things in quantifers then negate for this reason
"there is someone" => there exists
"everyone" => for all
so the original statement is
∃x such that P
and the negation is
∀x we have not P
where x is a classmate and P is not having a roommate
Closed by @novel juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

@novel juniper this is generally how negations get "pushed through" quantifiers
the for all's turn into existence, the exist's turn into for all
and the statement gets negated
yes, I should've said that
my mistake
but you should convert English sentences to logical statements before negation still
got it
it's just less ambiguous that way
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I got a question, so in this question do i need to find f(t) and then solve f(2)?
Considering they want you to estimate the amount of solid, it's likely that they want you to compute the derivative at t=2 and use the tangent line there as an approximation for t=3
Alrighty, so f'(2) would be equal to
-24 right?
Yeah that looks good
ok so now do i plug in t=3?
Well get the equation of the tangent line first
So this means y-y_0=m(x-x_0) right?
Yeah
so now i'm a bit confused,
how would i find the equation of the tangent line then?
You have m, that is the derivative at t=2.
You also know that the tangent line goes through (2,2) since that's where you computed the derivative
ok so our m value is =-24
oh and (2,2) because its 2 grams of solid at 2 seconds right?
Yep
ok so out y_0 value is 2?(and our x value)?
so our equation is gonna be y-2=-24(x-2)?
because m= -24
Yeah but like, physically this is the mass of solid inside the beaker
ok so lemme just send in my working
so this is our equation, and we find out slope right?
do i plug in for t then?121/60?
so i'd get -24.30083...
now i plug this back into the equation of the tangent line formula?
No. you don't need to compute the tangent line again
oh mb
You can use the old one
so y =-24(24.3008-2)+2?
im still getting a negative number guh
OH MY GOD WAIT
nvm i still got it wrong its so joeover
so now
y= 24.3008(3-2)+2 would be the way tofind out new y right?
No. y = -24(121/60 - 2) + 2
HOLY HECK THANK YOU I WILL NAME MY FIRST BORN AFTER YOU
.close
Closed by @dark crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need some help
i dont understand the algebra steps
how did they isolate f so nicely
very frustrating been stuck on this for 45 min
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone able to help real quick? need some sleep
why would you expect there to be any relationship between ABC and PQR at all
the transitive property doesn’t guarantee what they’re claiming
The current time for smayday is 04:23 AM (EDT) on Wed, 26/06/2024.
lol
get some rest before it gets to 4 am
Closed by @frigid lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Did you do a)
erm the turning point is at -1,13
it cuts through the middle of the graph
at x = -1 tho
so its that
Right
Closed by @limpid bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How am I supposed to know which graph is correct? I know that it is VERTICALLY stretched by a factor of 2 but I can’t tell the difference between any of them? I know the y axis is changing (some of them are at y = 2) but idk which is the right answer
@rocky steppe Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can't figure out how to do the required line integral in this question. I know how to do the Stokes' theorem part, but I can't figure out how to do the parametrization for the given region.
@wet laurel Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @wet laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi everyone. I'm French and I want to improve my english for my studies and I need help in a math problem. I have a project and if someone are interested to correspond with me, that could be nice for me. Thanks 🙂
what do you need help with
!2ada
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
!2adt
almost meolve
you'll get there eventually :)
@rain walrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
what do you have so far
I find slope
of both lines cuz paralle
then i try to put slope intercept form cuz reciprocal intercepts
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
which question?
or is it multiple choice?
yup that one
What even is a reciprocal intercept
.
i think
ya guys any progress
<@&286206848099549185>
.
I dont even know
Though the answer is between a and b
Since they have same slope
Aka parallel
i would assume recipricol intercepts mean that x intercept is the recipricol of y intercept
you can just find the intercepts of A and B to see if the have this property
since C and D are not parellel to the original equation
@exotic walrus Has your question been resolved?
im suggesting to literally find the intercepts of each of the 2 equations
like for example A has x intercept at +-2 and y intercept at +-1
these arent inverses so this isnt the answer
and continue
.close
Closed by @exotic walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
reciprocal intercepts means that x.y = 1. So you can evaluate each option. the way to evaluate is to find the intercepts. The intercept in x is when y is zero and the intercept in y is when x = 0. If you evaluate them you will find x and y, and the product of these two values should be equal to 1. After you find that you need to evaluate if the slope is the same as the given line (that means that both are parallel)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the reference angle i get is 20 degrees
but like their is no similar triangle for 20 degrees
any other way of doing this?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @karmic sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HELP
So maybe it cannot be determined then?