#help-33
1 messages · Page 123 of 1
Sure thing 
@hazy lion Has your question been resolved?
Okay here's the thoughts
jan Niku
We can create a subspace, call it Z, which is the span of $x_0$: $$Z = { \alpha x_0 : \alpha \in \mathbb K }$$ and as $X$ is a vector space then $Z$ is for sure a subspace
then exists some linear functional g on X such that norm of g is equal to norm of f
but norm of f is norm of x_0
but norm of x_0 isnt 0
then g cant be equivalently 0
then g is missing from {0}
@glass silo
how close tried to get it all on one page
Happy with that 
Closed by @hazy lion
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for 5
I think its left to right... but idk they are the same actually
You can find the answer from the left side to right
also you can do the other way round which is easier
Closed by @desert prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(non calc paper)
faiyrose
bro
i get it now
oml im dumb asf
i was doing it right i just didnt have to continue
i was finding the square root of x which I had to re square
thx for the help
.close
Closed by @tranquil elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a car moves 60km/h. How many km/h does the car need to increase the speed so the car goes 1km half a minute faster
How long does the car take to go 1 km now?
1 min?
1 min
No, I mean after it accelerates
Wdym after it accelerates
Right now it takes 1 min to cover 1km
It just gies 60km/h always
so after it speeds up (accelerates), how much time should it cover 1km in?
previously it was 1 min
2
No, the question says "so the car goes 1km half a minute faster"
If it currently goes 1km in 1 minute
0,3
so x in 1.5mins
So i need x
Is x 2/3?
So 2/3 times faster?
@small berry
So 40km/h faster?
30km/faster
No, half a minute is 0.5 minutes. The car needs to cover 1 km in 0.5 minutes less. If it initially covered 1km in 1 minute, it needs to cover it in 1-0.5 = 0.5 minutes
Closed by @main mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Cylinder A and Cylinder B are similar right cylinders. The radius of Cylinder A is 4, and its surface area is dπ. The surface area of Cylinder B is tπ. What is the value of t-d ?
Volume of Cylinder A is 480π
Volume of Cylinder B is 12960π
.close
Closed by @rigid vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I lost an argument against irrationals but I know he is wrong. He claims that irrationals do not exist, and gave this proof.
My friend said that
Have any “irrational” number a, and let n be a value so that a is a whole number.
We can represent this number as:
a10^n/10^(n+1)
This makes a rational number, since both the numerator and denominator are integers, and integers are rationals, so irrational numbers do not exist.
This looks correct and I wasn’t able to think of a way to contradict this proof.
That’s what he said
what the heck does that mean
Assume this irrational number isn't irrational, therefore it isn't irrational
So we start with assume a is irrational, then assume there exists an n that makes a whole number in the form of a10^n/10^(n+1)
ok, even if this number is whole
it doesn't change a
No he just means the numerator be a whole number
the number a10^n/10^(n+1) is not necessarily rational, why would you assume it to be?
if a is irrational then this number must also be irrational
therefore this number is completely irrational
this proof is irrational
what are you guys on about?
Irrationals being a real thing
I argued that irrationals were a thing and cannot be represented as a fraction
His proof basically is opposite of what I said
Has he ever heard of the square root of 2 proof?
You know pythagoras died on that hill
what hill
of there being no irrational numbers
Oh
Pythagoras had a problem with beans and irrationality. What really happened? I don't know! The square root of two is irrational, and beans are delicious.
My personal website, which you might like: http://vihart.com
What the flip 😭
Ok
Learn how Euclid proved that the square root of 2 is an irrational number.
also this
also this expression simplifies to a/10 and since a is irrational this new number must be too so it is irrational
I'm done with this lol
@mental kayak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I’d start by finding the relationship between the areas of the triangles
Then turn that into the ratio with the quadrilaterals
Do you have an idea of how to do this?
Yk how if you have two similar figures
The ratio of their perimeters is the same as the scale factor
I’m asking if you know this
<@&268886789983436800> troll
Let’s say you have two figures
If you multiply each side by the same thing
Then you multiply the perimeter (the sum of all of the sides) by that same value
The idea is similar for finding the ratio of the areas
Let’s keep it simple: you have a base and a height
Both the base and the height are multiplied by that scale factor
Based on this, what can you guess abt the relationship between the areas of two similar figures?
So …?
For similar shapes, the ratios between the "parallel" (i forgot the word, but corresponding or whatever) sides are all equal to a factor
Just focus on what I said
We’ll get there eventually
Once you get that, it’s relatively easy to finish
how do you find the area of the triangle
you know the ratios, 1:2:3 right
given to you by the problem
the ratios hold true for every part of the triangles (except the angles)
momentarily ignore all triangles except the larger one
its area would be B x H / 2 right?
you dont need it
you're working with theoretical stuff here
BB x HB / 2 = Areas of Big Triangle (B is for Big, M will be for Medium and S for small)
you know that, the Base of the Big Triangle, and its height, have a ratio
in your case its 3:6 or 1:2
use the ratio and rewrite the areas of each triangle as the area based on the sides of one of them
Closed by @grave shadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you eval this limit?
write it as a summation first
@proper kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @proper kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure how to begin
How would you approach this?
Oh wait sorry
Well it looks complicated but in simplified terms
what does this really say?
It wants the area of the square
Rectangle to be precise
yeah
it says that the function is given by h(x,y)
does any1 know how to read vernier calipers?
I do, but this help channel is occupied go find your own
So we have this gamma which is basically a set of points right?
notice that your functions is linear
that would make the surface area a rectangle
Gamma gives us points from (0, 0) inclusive to (2, 1) inclusive right?
mhm
Going through all values
Okay so this set of points is the domain for function h right?
mhm
This function is given by 2x - y + 1
this is the graph if it helps
In order to get the surface area of the rectangle that results from this function we really only need to look at the edge cases
that is, the end points of the rectnagle
mhm
right
What are the other 2?
Good
Let's call those points, in order of writing in this chat, A, B, C and D
Calculate h for those points
1,4,0,5
Good
Now you have points in space
in format of (x, y, h)
these are the points of your rectangle
So just calculate the distances between them and then calculate the surface
i got sqrt(2) for both
idk if thats correct
Let me just check that real quick
Did you calculate all the disctances?
or only for 2 pairs?
for 2 pairs
and then multiply
is that wrong?
distance between (0,0) to (0,1)
and distance between (2,1) to (2,0)
Ah, but you calculated the lengths of 2 opposite lines in the rectangle
You need 2 adjacent ones
oh
Yes, that works
then I get 2*sqrt(10)
For the surface?
yea
i love your pfp
Where did that come from?
what is that?
Oh, well
If you wanna take the integral approach you can
I don't know why you would but... go ahead...
Unless this is some super math basics course where you have to calculate area by definition and not by formula
yeah I kinda want
just not sure how
Yeah, that's a bit above my level atm, sorry
Its called a surface integral
you first parametrize the surface
For your surface, a simple parametrization would be
[ \Omega : [0,2]\times[0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^3 ]
[ \Omega (u,v) = (u, v, 2u - v + 1) ]
shsgd
can you send your working
norm is like sqrt(x_1^2+x_2^2+...+x_n^2)
crossp is cross product
yeah, well 2root6 is your answer then
@lost stratus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the radius is whatever u want it start from
we would have to choose where we make the linear speed measurements
since, in this scenario, their feet would be moving at a different linear speed than their heads
so the radius we consider is based on the speed measurement we consider
Closed by @obtuse python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question, what does the composite o thingy mean for matricies? Thanks 🙂
you can think of it as just matrix multiplication
basically you are finding T2 times that vector and then applying T1 to that
which is the same as multiplying T1 and T2 and then applying the product to the vector
sweet, so I got the vector (7 38 122) from multiplying T2 and the vector, so I would just multiply this new vector by T1?
yup
thanks for the help!
@delicate pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I really have no idea how to do this, I could use any help
correspondence theorem
I haven't heard of that
but now you have!! 
I don't think I can use it
What are the ideas
lift a normal subgroup of G/N to G
I have no idea what you mean by lift
i thought you worked out?
not much group theory in the gym
worked out what? the problem?
no i don’t think he worked out the problem yet
ok do the easy direction first then
Which is what direction?
Closed by @stark trail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me how to factor this its for trig identities,
break 8sin^2x into 4sin^2x + 4sin^2x
you can convert cos2x to 1-sin2x
and then let sinx = t
and solve it like a norma quadratic
after this you get 4sin^2x + 4 = 7
sin^2x = 3/4
sin x = root3/2
aight hold on, lemme try
how is that possible
$\cos^2{x}+\sin^2{x}=1$
yajat
$\cos^2{x}=1-\sin^2{x}$
yajat
that's just an identity
yh
idk how u dont know about this if you're solving such questions
what happened to the other "4sin^2x and 1-sinx
4sin^2 x + 4sin^2 x + 4cos^2 x = 7
4sin^2x + 4(sin^2x + cos^2x) = 7
then after i get
sin^2x=3/4 do i square rooth it
@errant loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @errant loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A company produces widgets with an average weight of 50 grams and a standard deviation of 8 grams. A quality control inspector randomly selects a sample of 36 widgets.
Is there an error to the problem
@unkempt goblet Has your question been resolved?
$$ z = \frac{50 - 50}{\frac{8}{\sqrt{36}}} = \frac{0}{\frac{8}{6}} = 0 $$
misha
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t have any work for this question because I’m unsure where to start as it’s a written question and I suck at them. The question starts like this: A small radio transmitter broadcasts in a 45-mile radius. If you drive along a straight line from a city 63 miles north of the transmitter to a second city 62 miles east of the transmitter, for how much of the drive in miles will you be able to pick up a signal from the transmitter? Round your answer to 4 decimal places.
start by drawing a pic
@quick hollowpoor pic, not enough of the info represented
that's a very precise representation
the lengths and radius should be indicate on your diagram
as well as the path the car
It just occurred to me that the car can’t be going negative miles so it has to stay in the first quadrant. I assumed the cars path started at the top of the circle then went to the bottom my bad. Do you want me to draw that representation?
@late geode
the car doesn't start on the circle
the circle represents the range of the broadcast
the car start starts outside of that
Ik, the circle only has a 45d radius I’m just saying I thought the line started at 63 on top of the circle and went to 62 under the circle.
But that doesn’t really matter, now that ik what the problem actually looks like, how do I solve it?
make equations based on the cooridnate system
Treat me like I’m learning this for the first time, whst is the coordinate system? @late geode
coordinates of the xy plane
Btw tell me if you want me to stop pinging you I just don’t know if your seeing my msgs
And how do I make the equations, all ik is the radius and where the line starts and ends.
@late geode
Ik 2 but I’m assuming your talking about this one?
If you are then I think I got it I’ll try the rest by myself.
This one?
still no
well its related to the equation for a circle, but not quite what i want from you
@quick hollow Has your question been resolved?
Then I don’t know
look up equaiton of a circle
?
yes
you have you radius r
and for convenience, have your station located at the origin(0,0)
now you'll need to get your equation for the path of the vehicle
i.e. the equation that passes through (63,0) and (0,62)
Is it a different formula than the ones I’ve already showed?
yes
Well I have to go. Does this (help 33) stay open till tmrw?
its going to time out, just repost when you come back
if you know you're going for an extended amount of time, just close
Alright good bye
@quick hollow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does this give me the wrong answer
Better off using DeMoivres theorem I believe
[ z^n = r^n(\cos n\theta + i\sin n\theta ) ]
shsgd
use is with how you're using arctan
due to its range
you'd need to consider the location of your complex number and perform a quadrant shift if needed (which it is here)
essentially use what's called arctan2
Does the range have to be from -π to π?
not necessarily
some places use 0 to 2pi for the principal argument
the range of arctan being from -pi/2 to pi/2 is insufficient regardless
How do you tell when a quadrant shift is needed?
plot your point on the argand diagram/plane or otherwise to determine which quadrant its in
here it is i - 1
so it is in the second quadrant
consider the periodicity of tan
identify
tan(what angle in Q2) = -1
what even is your question jonnyboy
you are in the one i asked
make your own, it is easier
3pi/4
Sorry my bad
didn't realise who's channel this was
yeh
what formula do i use
consider the periodicity of tan
identify
tan(what angle in Q2) = -1
yes
ok, but dont i sitll need you use the formula tan^-1(b/a)
not really
if you want to explicitly use that,
you'd perform a quadrant shift here by adding pi to that result to get something in Q2
Hi im so happy im back
how you do it, whether a shift is needed will depend on what you have
as a basic trig question you're essentially looking for theta in (-pi,pi] where
tan(theta) = -1
sin(theta) > 0
cos(theta) < 0
and use whatever method you want to find that
why -3pi/4
that is the angle
no?
how no
how are you getting -3pi/4 for the angle
yeh and you said 3pi/4 earlier
which i said was correct
you've now changed it to something incorrect
@cerulean oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cerulean oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help determining the magnetic moment of a spinning charged sphere
@tight meteor Has your question been resolved?
you need to explain your question a lot more than that
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Well uh
I'm given the radius, angular velocity, and charge uniformly distributed acrosss the volume
7 I guess?
I have a vague idea but I'm not quite sure
well you need to post the actual question haha
Alright hold on let me translate it and type it out
Determine the magnetic moment $\mu$ of a solid sphere of radius $r$, and charge $q$ distributed uniformly across its volume, with an angular velocity $\omega$ about its diameter.
jewels!
Is that better?
yes, but i have no idea how to solve this one sorry, i think ill be learning it soon, but now that the question is more visible, people who know will now try to help you
It's alright, I appreciate your time!
also, if you dont get anyone to help, there is a physics server which will be a better place to put it
It's pretty dead 😭
I was helped with electromagnetism last time here by an indivudal in college
yea
If they show up again I'll be lucky :)
Good luck with that!
havent done moments + magnetism rn so im sorry
Haha don't apologize its alright
maybe try calculating the force from the magnetic field
and do the torque formula
Year 12?
"grade 12?" i dont know, im in australia
Is it undergraduate?
I don't think there is electromagnetic momentum in my specification (A level)
yeah, im not doing electromagnetic momentum, OP is
Give us some equations from your book
What induce the motion?
What equation?
Uh nothing, it's just spinning
But is force applied to charge?
It's not in a magnetic field so I assume not
Do you know Biot-Savart
should be a direct triple integral to compute
yay the cavalry has arrived
I do but how would I use it here
out of my scope 😭
Physics Ninja shows you how to calculate the magnetic moment of a uniformly charged spinning sphere.
Magnetic Moment of a Disk: https://youtu.be/4F0p_VvYvMc
Magnetic Moment of a Shell: https://youtu.be/4pFlrDIh4Yo
I found it easy
What I thought was $dq = \rho 4\pi x^2 \dd{x}$
jewels!
Onky thing I don't know is how to derive expression for infinitely small volume dt but who cares
doesnt that feel like cheating
I just need some guidance
What kind of cheating? That's just proof you suppose to know, by using what you have been taught.
For me it is not cheating because I haven't new what is magnetic even is
But once you define variables precisely it just trivial
I'm supposed to derive it
and then $di = \frac{dq}{T} = \frac{\omega dq}{2\pi}$
dt only important part to define infinitely small volume on a sphere
jewels!
bruh finally
yeah im doing that
i know it goes down to elements
and I guess then $d\mu = Adi$ but i dont know what A would be
jewels!
I don't know maybe you can use left hand rule + definition of angular momentum to derive first equation
angular momentum?
Yeah maybe. I mean look you have current passing through the area of a sphere inducing rotation at particular strip of a sphere this strip define circle since sphere solid there is charges on this strip then Area * charge density over time * volume which have this charge density
here
I think first equation do no need prove, and dt component to describe infinitely small volume is also trivial approximation, and maybe you can just quot it?
ugh ill come back to this later when my brain has cleared up
Area will be just pir^2
But r is not radius of a sphere
So you should multiply radius of sphere by angle sinx to find the r. Because you make angle x with r and radius of a sphere upon touching required circle. Just do right angle triangle there for horizontal conponent
but for the shell element that I do have it would be 4pir^2 for all the current
wha
what sin(x)
Give me a minute
$d\mu = 4\pi x^2 \frac{\omega dq}{2\pi}$
jewels!
$d\mu = 4\pi x^2 \frac{\omega 4\pi \rho x^2 \dd{x}}{2\pi}$
jewels!
okay uh I have
Then define current as Q/T
Where T=time period
For w=2pif
f-frequency=1/T
Therefor I= wQ/2pi
thats what im doing yes
jewels!
Is this right?
Maybe I can't read this notations
Define derivative of I then Area separately
Then you can combine them
Yeah I know.
Have you defined dQ as pdt?
pdt?
P=Q/volume of sphere
Yeah dt is infinitely small volume of a point where rotation occurs
idk i used spherical shell elements
Like rotation occurs at the strip of a circle but in reality there is infinitely small vertical component
I mean just compare with video, there is no cheating in video as long as you can remember the proof because it is trivial and not a problem solving
😭 man I need to derive it myself
Yeah you do by knowing a couple of identities which are used in the video, otherwise you can't derive it from scratch
So if you can't remember required identities just look them up, that's what this video is doing
here
why is he using 3 integrals
what
I don't know, I am not pr0 either I just can explain steps done on the video, so I can't really do much of a rearangments
Just multiplication :/
You know what makes function integradable?
Terms like dt, dx, ds
If you have them separately just multiply out :/
That's pretty simple actually
I mean it is really nice proof, really clear unlike those maths proofs
i havent been taught stuff like that before
i doubt thats the way im meant to do it
You mean that you can distribute integral?
anything involving more than one integral
look if you have
dy/dx=y/x
Find y
y = mx
Just isolate variables and integrate both sides
It is similar here because you have dt, dx terms
Alright so what is dt
Represent if t is time?
Alright Integral of dt =dt because integration reverse differentiation, so you need to have this dt term under integration
@still temple You seemed to have been typing for a while 😅 I don't want any of it to go to waste I'll be back in like an hour save it for then
Is it the only question you have?
integral of dt = dt what
Closed by @tight meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@still temple I checked the answer with a friend of mine and I think what I did was right
Although I'd still be interested in listening to what you've got to say
what did u do? i forgor
I used spherical shell elements
also my explanation was more or less building up the intuition to forming the triple integral in spherical coordinates
yeah
I didn't have no angles involved though
I defined $dq = \rho dV$ where $dV = 4\pi x^2 dx$
jewels!
And then $d\mu = Adi$ where $di = \frac{dq}{T}$, and since $T = \frac{2\pi}{\omega}$ we end up with $d\mu = (4\pi x^2 ) \frac{4\pi\rho x^2\omega dx}{2\pi}$
jewels!
yeah
ok thats cursed notation
x is the distance from the center
use dr instead 
sorry im used to it 😭
could have but the radius of the shell is r so
dr'
🙄
okay 😔
ok but yeah carry on
yeah so thats the volume element
the only part that im still a little doubtful is the value of A
I just chucked in 4pi r^2 because it felt right??
and it is right
i mean
:/
the surface area of a spherical shell is [
4\pi r'^2
]
so whats the issue

yeah but
the magnetic moment of a loop has the area be that enclosed by the current
if I had a loop, the moment would be iA where A is the area of the loop
in this case though is the current really "enclosing" the surface area of the sphere?
hmmm 
I think
every shell can be deconstructed into an infinite number of rings
and the total area enclosed by those rings perhaps?
and magically that is the surface area of the sphere 😭
i mean i am not sure about the theory of it rn but i am pretty sure the two situations between just having a loop and a solid sphere are not completely synonymous in their physical meaning here
I actually understand that
Because a bar magnet's magnetic moment is defined analagous to that of a loop
Despite having no "area"
also i can see what u did being purely mathematical in terms of ease. Because basically setting up the triple integrals i mentioned involves creating differential volumes of "loops" in the sphere
(so instead of dV being a spherical shell concentric to ur actual sphere, it is a sort of plate-ish circular volume which u integrate over)
I see
like uh
It's alright if I'm too dumb for it 😂
hard to draw with a mouse
but ont he right is what u did more or less
yeah
on the left is the other method that gets u the loops and the triple integrals
i mean i guess both are equivalent at the end of the day but the first is more reasonable in like
the loop idea u mentioned
yes sadly hs EM is really constrained in what it can explain
It's alrighttt
I appreciate the effort
If there's nothing left to say, I'll close the channel?
you might wanna turn that off btw haha
Closed by @tight meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thats a thing? damn
It is for me 😭
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if $H(x) = max {f(x),g(x)}$ where $ f C \in [a,b]$ is $H \in C[a,b]$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Also, put \s before the { and }
if $H(x) = max {f(x),g(x)}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
where $g,f \in C [a,b]$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
then is $H \in C [a,b]$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Can you give an example?
Dont worry about giving exact representations for f and g, just a picture that proves this statement
You will see why H must also be continuous, and then we can formulate a formal argument
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
on $[0 , \frac{\pi}{2}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
And what is the point of discontinuity here?
Also, tan(x)-1 isnt continuous on [0,π/2]
oh, because of the asymptote at $\frac{\pi}{2}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ok
is this supposed to be an easy problem, feel like I'm missing something obvious
You feel that there are continuous f and g such that H is discontinuous, so try drawing the graphs of f and g which give you discontinuous H
You will see why H must be continuous (|| intermediate value theorem ||)
I don't get what IVt has to do with this
The only points that can be candidates for the discontinuity of H are when H switches from taking the values of g to taking the values of f (or vice versa). And that switch can happen only at points where f=g, so H must be continuous. If that makes sense
It will become very obvious if you draw a picture(and try to construct a counterexample), which is why ive been advocating for you to do it
wait, why must $f(x)=g(x)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
did you draw anything yet?
yeah
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
why does that one work?
oh
H is a piecewise mix of f and g
it's slightly cumbersome to iron out the details, but the idea is simple
no difference, it's symmetric wrt f and g
but then H won't be continuous
Not sure what you mean
Can you draw a diagram like this? What you sent rn doesnt make much sense
how do I do that on my computer
Ms paint
F and g must be defined for the whole interval
Here f and g are defined for different intervals
ah
that's what I was missing
got ti
*it
seems so trivial now
D
thanks
.close
Closed by @novel juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How should I approach such problems? Is there a trick?
draw it out
do some doodling
usually it works
@proper kiln Has your question been resolved?
@proper kiln Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @proper kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does this suffice?
the proof looks good. Since we assumed |x| >= |y|, you can drop the outermost modulus after the first equality, but it's fine either way
Closed by @void elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
quick question, couldn't you just use the result from C here
.reopen
✅
Compelx numbers
but this is R^n
Closed by @void elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can u show me different ways u can type this equation
help
wdym
Denascite
is that what you are looking for?
what the dash above a mean?
@hallow edge Has your question been resolved?
sqrt of 3
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Which part are you stuck on?
you don't need to solve an equation there
i didn't solve?
i just sub in (4,2)
the function is already in his canonical form
(4+p)=0
p=-4
where does = 0 come from

they're giving you the function in its vertex form
where p is the x coordinate of the vertex
and q the y coordinate of the vertex
and since you already know p and q, you only need to state their values
.close
Closed by @orchid zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with this one
why is this wrong solution
im so confused
ah nvm
you forgot about the differential after substituting
m = z^3 => dm = 3z^2 dz
are you sure they asked u to solve the integral? this is pretty hard
i dont remember the problem description exactly but i think so
wait so
it would be (tanm)^-1 x 3z^2 ?
on the second line
no
you cant integrate m with respect to z. You need the entire integral to be in terms of one var iable in order to integrate
so how would i write the differential in terms of m
$m = z^3 => z = m^{\frac{1}{3}} => dz = \frac{1}{3m^{\frac{2}{3}}}dm$
Obotron
as i said earlier this integral is hard. unfortunately, substitution is not the way to go about it. it''s more likely the original problem involves differentiating the integral with respect to x
Closed by @drowsy bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, can somebody teach me how to solve this? Thank you!
The answer key says the answer is 86.60 but I just don't understand how they got there.. I need the solution
What function relates the opposite and hypotenuse?
sine
yeah
i recently got this problem, if u need help somewhere ask
I wanna know how they got to 86.60 m
is it sin 60° = 100/AC?
oh
From my point, Hypotenuse and Adjacents could be remembered as lengths or distance of an object
And opposites are just Heights
u got it?
opposite
OHHHHHHHHHH
II GET IT NOW
i just misunderstood the question this whole time
sin 60° = h/100
100 sin 60° = h
h = 86.60
thank u
so much
.close
Closed by @jagged zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ur amazing
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
LOGIC AND PROBABILITY PROOF
Is this proof valid or does it contain some mistake? see #help-35 message for context.
-
P(A|B&C) ≈ 1 [Premise 1]
-
P(A|B&C) = P(A&B&C)/P(B&C) [Definition of conditional probability]
-
P(A&B&C)/P(B&C) ≈ 1
-
P(A&B&C) ≈ P(B&C) [Result 1]
-
P( ~A | ~B) ≈ P( ~A & C | ~B) ≈ 1 [Premise 2]
-
P( ~A | ~B) = P( ~A & ~B)/P(~B) [Definition of conditional probability]
-
P( ~A & ~B)/P(~B) ≈ 1
-
P( ~A & ~B) ≈ P(~B)
-
P( ~A & C | ~B) = P( ~A & C & ~B)/P(~B) [Definition of conditional probability]
-
P( ~A & C & ~B)/P(~B) ≈ 1
-
P( ~A & C & ~B) ≈ P(~B)
-
P(C|A&B) ≈ 0 [Premise 3]
-
P(C|A&B) = P(A&B&C)/P(A&B) [Definition of conditional probability]
-
P(A&B&C)/P(A&B) ≈ 0
-
P(A&B&C) ≈ 0
-
P(A&B&C) ≈ P(B&C) from Result 1
-
P(A&B&C) ≈ 0 from Result 15
-
P(B&C) ≈ 0
-
P(~B) = P(A&B&C) + P( ~A & C & ~B) + P( ~A & ~B) [Law of total probability]
-
P(A&B&C) ≈ 0 from Result 15
-
P( ~A & C & ~B) ≈ P(~B) from Result 11
-
P( ~A & ~B) ≈ P(~B) from Result 8
-
P(~B) ≈ 0
-
P(B|~A&C) = P( ~A & B & C)/P( ~A & C) [Definition of conditional probability]
-
P( ~A & B & C) ≈ 0 [Given P(~B) ≈ 0, and sub-events of ~B must be ≈ 0]
-
P(B|~A&C) ≈ 0
Therefore, we have proved ¬(P(B|~A&C) ≈ 1) using the given premises in the style of a logical proof.
@gaunt gale Has your question been resolved?
**LOGIC AND APPROXIMATE PROBABILITIES (slightly advanced) with additional premise (in p2.) **
*the problem: *
I want to prove ¬( P(B | ¬A & C) ≈ 1 )
from the premises (probably not all parts of all premises are required)
- P(A | B & C) ≈ 1 ≈ P(A | B) [premise 1 (hereafter, p1.)]
- P(~A | ~B & C) ≈ 1 ≈ P(~A | ~B) ≈ P( ~A & C | ~B) [p2.]
- P(C & A | B) ≈ 0 ≈ P(~C & ~A | ~B) [p3.]
- P(C | A & B) ≈ P(C | A & ~B) ≈ 0 ≈ P(C | A) ≈ P(~C | ~A) [p4.]
- P(C | ~A & B) ≈ P(C | ~A & B) ≈ 1 ≈ P(C | ~A) ≈ P( ~C | A) [p5.]
we don't have precise numbers, just approximate one's.
can this be done? If not, what other premise would be required to prove this? Is this set of premises consistent?
@gaunt gale Has your question been resolved?
@gaunt gale Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @gaunt gale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
LOGIC/PROBABILITY PROOF
there are 15 premises (you probably only need 4 of them tho)
- P(A | B & C) ≈ 1
- P(A | B) ≈ 1
- P(~A | ~B & C) ≈ 1
- P(~A | ~B) ≈ 1
- P( ~A & C | ~B) ≈ 1
- P(C & A | B) ≈ 0
- P(~C & ~A | ~B) ≈ 0
- P(C | A & ~B) ≈ 0
- P(C | ~A & B) ≈ 1
- P(C | ~A & ~B) ≈ 1
- P( ~C | A) ≈ 1
we want to conclude that ¬(P(B | ¬A & C) ≈ 1) it's very important that these are approximate premises. This for example, means that you cannot use P(C | ~A) ≈ 1 to mean if ~A then C, that makes an assumption that you would need to support, i.e. P(C | ~A) ≈ 1 ≠ P(C | ~A) ≈ 1. Curious to hear what you come up with. Ping me if you want some preliminary results
<@&286206848099549185> anyone here who knows a bit about logic/probability theory? I really need some help, im super stuck....
- P(ABC) ≈ P(BC)
- P(AB) ≈ P(B)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~BC)
- P(~A~B) ≈ P(~B)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~B)
- P(ABC) << P(B)
- P(~A~B~C) << P(~B)
- P(A~BC) << P(A~B)
- P(~ABC) ≈ P(~AB)
- P(~A~BC) ≈ P(~A~B)
- P(A~C) ≈ P(A)
this is in a different format
Along with the proposition to prove:
P(~ABC) << P(~AC)
(note that I just removed the & signs for brevity, ~AB means ~A & B, not ~(A & B))
@knotty trellis are you still interested in this problem? I got a more advanced and probably provable version
I'm interested, but my free time is quite limited in present days :/
@gaunt gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone walk me through step by step on how to do question 11 im so very lost 😭😭🙏🙏🙏🙏
(a+b)/c = a/c + b/c
ok now i have 1 - 1^n/n
where do i go from there>
?
what do you think
im not really sure because i dont really understand any of the steps im supposed to take for this problem
like i know i need to find the limit as n approaches infinity
but i dont know why
or like what doing that does
you don't need to do that
oh
you need to determine if the sequence is bounded, monotonic, or both
do you know what those mean
bounded means like it cant go above or below a certain value?
monotonic means its either increasing or decreasing
yes but to be more specific
the sequence {a_n} is bounded if |a_n| <= C for a constant C, for all n
agreed?
why is it only less than or equal to?
if it's less than or equal to C
it's strictly less than C+1
or C+ (anything positive)
so it doesn't matter
Okay so try determining if the sequence is bounded then
i.e determine the maximum value of |a_n|
this sequence is not less than or equal to 1, as n=2 is 1 + 1/2 = 3/2
oh
would it be less than 2?
Why do you think that?
wait sorry one sec isnt this supposed to be 1 - 1/2?
and also be specific what you mean by "it"
(-1)^(2) = 1
ohhh
would it be less than 3.2
3/2
sorry idk the proper way to say it
like the sequence is bounded by 3/2?
I gave the proper way to say it here
and if you think it's bounded by 3/2, you should try proving why
you'd have to prove
|a_n| <= 3/2 for all n
is there a formula or something i can use to prove that?
I just told you
|a_n| <= 3/2 for all n is what you must prove
start by replacing a_n = 1+ (-1)^n/n
then what
ok now i have (-1)^n <= 1/2n
?
like i subtracted both sides by 1
(-1)^2 = 2 which is not less than 1/2(2) = 1/4
You need to pay more attention to what I'm saying
reread from here
appreciate it
