#help-33
1 messages ยท Page 115 of 1
its sqrt(171)/2 ๐ญ
huh
but ya did it right

now we do final step
the rhombus area is already hinted by them
yessir
two infact
wait so i just add 16.25 + 16.25 right??? or what
yeh
now add them all together
no need to thank 
@alpine gulch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @alpine gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help
,rotate
what question is it?
number 8
yep
so from here the top lenght is 10-x
from here we can use pythagoreom theorem
and see that $(10-x)^2+7^2=10^2$
Project_Nova
so then it would be one hundred minus x squared plus 49=100 which will equal 149-x squared =100 which that will equal -x squared equals to -49
south
hold on so what does this mean
Project_Nova
yeah
this is what it actually equal to
So here a = 10 and b = -x
yep
so its $10^2-20x+x^2+7^2=10^2$ for ya
Project_Nova
i have no idea what to do with these ๐ญ
worded problems are just difficult idk why
wheh?
do you know what next to do here?
do you know the quadratic formula
i believe we have forgotten one step also
a condition
that $x>=10$
Project_Nova

youre overcomplicating it
do tell how
(10-x)^2 + 49 = 100
(10-x)^2 = 51
since 10-x is positive,
10-x=sqrt(51)
x=10-sqrt(51)
wohh

i see, thanks sir
also your answer is here john
honestly this the first time ive seen it solved this way
letting x to be the required length was more confusing
you can see it more easily if you considered x^2+7^2=10^2
oh okay thanks
i kind of get it
those questions make absolutely no sense
!close
.close
Closed by @sacred ermine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me see what I did wrong here? (Markscheme says the answer is C
Please tell me if my handwriting or any of my steps are unclear
The blue paper is my working
it is A
how would it be C?
idk
๐ญ
what is markscheme
answer sheet
are you sure that it says C?
Closed by @meager glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm given to planes s_1 and s_2
"Determine the tangentline T to the curve ฮณ in the point A
How do I solve questions like these?
Since i want the tangentline which i assume is :
y = kx + m
I'm therefor missing k and m.
So i input A:s cordinates into r(t) ?
@glass silo Are you awake? ;-;
Or should it be :
y = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a)
You have to find the tangent vector using differentiation.
what is r(t)?
But if i were to find the tangent vector, would it be by using this: ?
r(t) is a vector
Weird of him to write tangentline then
If it's a vector that i want to find
I would assume it's any of these formulas
vector equation of line, also you don't need partial derivatives as r(t) is a function of t only
not that it really matters
Don't need a formula just find dr(t) / dt
I'm sorry i don't think i understand
I already figured out r'(t) in a previous step a)
do i just plug in A:s cordinates into the vector?
to find the tangent vector at that point, however u still need to go through the process of finding the equation of the line
Ideally i'd like to understand what you are talking about
He never mentions a gradient vector
or a vector
"Determine the tangentline T to the curve in the point A"
I can't read whatever language ur sheet is in and I can't see the full question, but what u essentially want to do is get an equation of the form X(t) = X0 - Vd
I'm supposed to determine the tangentline T to the curve in the point A.
So don't i just derive r(t). Input the x,y and z coordinates for A which results in a vector that is the line of the tangentline?
this is the form of equation you are looking for indeed. The difference is f(a) and f'(a) are vectors, and so y is a 'vector equation' of a line
last point the x will obviously change to t
$r(t) = \pmqty{e^t + e^{-t} \ e^t - e^{-t} \ e^{2t}-e^{-2t}}$
Merineth
So this is a curve in R^3 space, right?
what is the full question in English ?
"Determine the tangentline T to the curve in point A"
what is the point A or is it not given?
I have no idea what that says
ok lol here. The tangent line : y(t) = A + t*r'(a) where a is the value of 't' that gives A [that is r(a) = A]. I mean to find the value of t you could try writing the expressions in r(t) as hyperbolic functions. I have somet to do tho so if u really can't get it after trying what I have just said ping helpers.
<@&286206848099549185>
@ebon depot Has your question been resolved?
@ebon depot Has your question been resolved?
the tangent line would have to be perpendicular to the gradient vectors of both surfaces at the point and i think in the question it gives you the equations, gradient F dot product tangent vector
f1 f2 and r are given so i think u can find it this way (solve for t)
This is very hard for me to understand
I understand that i'm suppost to find a line
A line has the equations
L : (x,y,z) = A + t * v
Where:
A = The point A
v = directional vector
yes
And i'm looking for a directional vector on the point A
yes
If i input the point A:s x, y and z into the system of equation
Like so?
I attempted this but there is no t that solves all of these equations
No sorry that's r(t)
we want r'(t) ?
or if u are doing a or b
ok
My assumption was that
a tangentline can be written in the form
y = kx + m?
But that doesn't work right? For R^3
I went back to my onevariablecalculus and found that a tangentline to the curve y = f(x) can be written as $y = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a)$
Merineth
Some other dude said it's correct but f(a) and f'(a) are vectors instead?
But i'm not sure at all what i'm supposed to do
i was thinking find t by getting dot product of gradient F and r'(t) = 0
Hm that does not seem right
If i understand it correctly, i have a curve in R^3 and it's asking me what the tangentline on the point A is
But what kind of line do they mean? y = kx + m, y=f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) or (x,y, z ) = A + t * v
why = 0?
ok nvm i think you would also have to consider that the tangent vector is perpendicular to the other surface as well
i think someone else could probably explain this better/correctly
I severely doubt it, been waiting 3 hours for someone who might know. And for the past week none has been able to help
Seems like multivariablecalculus is just to advanced now
.close
Closed by @ebon depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
What's the problem?
#help-48 Summed it up more clearly here
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I am not able to find the mistake in my solution
ill send the pic
if i understood the question correctly, the problem is with my dr integral
however wolfram seems to agree with my calculations
so the problem is probably with dA itself
idk whats wrong tho
wait nvm
my power is wrong, it should be r^26
.close
Closed by @robust heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need some help
how are they getting from the penultimate step to the last
same with this
for first one
idek
integration by parts
secx is not a standard function tho
how did you figure that out
it's a standard integral
Learn how to integrate sec(x) with this Calculus 2 tutorial for your AP calculus or college calculus class. We will do the standard way of multiplying the numerator and the denominator by (sec(x)+tan(x)).
Check out my 100 integrals for more integration practice for your Calculus 1 or calculus 2 class. https://youtu.be/dgm4-3-Iv3s?si=lTybJlpTMF...
i thought only sec^2x was
i mean "standard" is relative but intregral of sec is pretty well known
figure it out idk
?
now you know it so
idk how you want me to answer this question
ok nvm
what about
the second one
OK
ok
such as
can you use double angle
or smth
uh the method ik is weierstrass substitution
im sorry
but this is nonsense
they dont tell me anything about how to integrate the cotx
you're telling me i need to know all these standard integrals >?
you don't need to memorize them
i thought if i get cotx
but it's not difficult to do
it would just be -cosex^2x
it's just a simple u sub
i dont get it tho
like
look what at what i said
i am answering what you said
no
look
if cosec^2x integrated
gets you - cotx
wait i bugged out
yeah so anyway..
.
what's the simple U sub in cotx
u = sin
i mean, it's just experience
^
if you're inexperienced, it doesn't make sense that you would "just know" which u to take
1/sin/cos
re-write that as cos/sin, and make the substitution u = sin(x) and try it out
.close
Closed by @sharp hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i got ti
yh yh ofc ofc
nice
but they write the answer directly
which makes me think they want us to just know it
lol
but it doesn't tell us these 'standard' integrals anywhere
also you could also notice that since cot = cos/sin, and cos is the derivative of sin, this intergrates to be some func with ln (natural log)
like i said, "standard" is relative
yeah that's not rlly relevant tho
what you're saying
i just meant that it's simple to integrate and the result is well known
how is standard integral defined then
like
it can't be that arbitrary
i thought there's a given list of integrals
if you want to change the description of it then that's on you
sir i don't really wanna debate the semantics of this
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the integral $$\int_{-1}^1 \frac1{x} \ dx$$ not defined as a Lebesgue integral? What are the positive and negative parts of $1/x$ in $[-1,1]$?
Philip
.close
Closed by @frank eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure conceptually how to go about this
at first i found her horizontal velocity... should i then find her vertical velocity and then find the angle between them?
Find vert and Boris
Horiz
And then you can use pythag
To find the velocity of them combined
nono the angle
oh woops
ok i corrected the arctan mistake and its still wrong
i got 18.8449 degrees
its ok! not time sensitive
i just have 2 attempts left so i wanna make sure its right so i dont lose points
ok sry
im back
ok
so you have two componets
copx and copy
first off, copy is going to be easier
both jill and jack aren't heading the vertical direction so
idk what u did here tbh
idk how u got this velocity
and in the end jack has a vertical y component
right here
did i just type it wrong maybe
46
yes
yeah it shouldnt be more than 5 huh
i thought 8 should be negative because its going in the opposite direction
should jills velocities still be negative then?
ok
her horiz, no
vert, yes
but when you express an angle you wouldnt express it as a negative angle
you would BH
meaning below horizontal
54.046
x/y
y/x
woops my bad i think im slow rn
yeah TOA
and horizontal is x componet
35.954
rahhhh thanks for sticking with me
np
u aswell
.close
Closed by @tardy idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I expand and simplify
First I put in -2 into the first bracket
you dont need to, but sure
Closed by @flint reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i solve this
my first approach wil be break the whole thing into x^3-2x^2 and -4
so that it gets easy to solve then
am i right
?
cool
i reluctant a bit for that method cause i thought that this is rate of change of the function not the actually function
but i can use that manupilation
ok
.close
Closed by @oblique musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so im just not sure when applying the divergence theorem when I converted to spherical coordinates
I get the correct answer with dv = dz dr d theta
but not with dv = r dz dr d theta
oh sorry thats a bad picture actually
i wonder if it's being integrated incorrectly?
the textbook says this answer is correct for 620 pi
heres the problem again
ok so our integrand is the divergence, which you found is: [ \nabla \cdot \vec{F} = 3x^2 + 3y^2 + 3z^2 ] What is that in polar (cylindrical) coordinates?
pnoืษ
6cos^2 (theta) = 6sin^2(theta) + 3z^2
like I wrote above
in polar coordinates we have: [ x = r \cos \theta, \quad y = r \sin \theta, \quad z = z ]
pnoืษ
r is a variable, not a constant, so we can't just substitute a value yet
ok
maybe the solution is incorrect?
you can get the same number without necessarily having the right approach
so returning to this, what is this expression in terms of r, theta, and z?
3r^2cos^2 theta, 3r^2 sin^2 theta and 3z^2
oh wait
is that my mistake
is that I substituted r for the constant value
Ok I think I get what you mean
but now im getting 120 pi
is there something wrong with my integration boundaries
nvm
I forgot to square r also
ok I got the correct solution the right way
@fervent rampart also is this a typo
is that supposed to say divF = 10
F = 10 means nothing to me
i would assume so
@topaz latch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @topaz latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@oblique holly Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just wanted to check my answers on this
Closed by @late salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- A 50.0 kg person on a trampoline bounces to a height of 5.0 m. On their second bounce they end up only 4.5 m high. On their third bounce they end up 6.0 m high.
a. If they just bounced without using any effort, how much energy was lost in the second bounce to sound and heat?
@waxen nest try the physics server in #old-network
you can say Energy at beginning = Energy after bouncing + Energy lost
ok know what don't trust me
hey friends
i was here, testing some calculus II questions, and im stopped in this:
the mission is integrate by substituition, but i failed, anyone can help?
@waxen nest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct or wrong
The reason I think my answer is wrong is because of the isomorphic invariant that includes the shades regions being different than eachother, therefore the graphs are different
G has 5 shaded parts and H has 2 does that mean this graph isn't isomorphic
@reef hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to prove this equality
either by going from right to left or left to right
been trying the whole day
(calculus 3)
(its a long proof)
I can show my game plan if needed
Do you know how to use the chain rule?
Ok
okay so here is my game plan to proof this
my goal is to make a proof from left to right
but before that I did my tree to see what are the variables in question and what depends on what
Ok
here is my tree thats how I view it
I know Z is my dependent variable
and he depends on both the function f(u) and g(v)
Yes
and both of these functions depend of x and y
Indeed
but we cant forget this little thing
since I did u=x-y and v=x+y I need to transform my 1/x to Us and Vs since I did a variable change
so I did the following
Ok
so 1/x= 2/u+v
Seems legit
Fair enough
and I can start my proof from here
How did you proceed?
my game plan is going from right to left
I started off like this
we know this:
so I have to find dz/dy
yes
z is now in terms of u and v
So chain rule right?
Yes
ok buddy
then I calculated the du/dy and dv/dy
it gives 1
wich is like saying this:
Fair enough
from this point things get heated
I have to find dz/dv and dz/du right
so I did this
I replaced my z basically
thoughts?
my logic is I know Z is a multiplication
Ok, it looks complicated but good
so I did the multiplication rule u'v*uv'
Good job there!
Ok
But not the other ones that aren't constant
yup
I end up with this
after doing the derivates
the law I used is this one:
thats how I did the 2/u+v
Ok, so far so good
I used the red thingys so I can see my terms and not get mixed up
I end up with this and a bunch of things end up canceling themselfs due to the minus
this is after calculating d/dy
still used u'v+uv'
Give me a sec, I'm trying to check all of it
no problem
I know there is a lot of ''writing'' mistakes so ill apologize for that
a bit messy
but the idea is there
Ok, my recommendation is to cancel those terms that occur with opposite signs to simplify the following equation
But everything seems ok
I end up with this
only 4 terms and 2 can get simplified to 0
from this point there might have been a mistake
do you think im allowed to say the first and third therm are equal to 0?
No, cuz 'u' and 'v' depend on 'y'
if everything before is correct, it means that this expression (ignore the 0s) is equal to this
do you have in mind a way to transform that to this?
or do we restart
Wait no, srry my mistake, forgot that $x=(u+v)/2$, so $1/x=2/(u+v)$
bondalton
So the y-derivatives are zero indeed
ohh yeahh thats the logic I used
mb im awake for like 18 hours
because there is no y so its a constante
and equals to zero
Yep
so after that I did this
Sorry for the confusion
all good
I end up with this and this is where iv been stuck for the past 5 hours
idk how to do this
the one in red
I still havent transformed my x^2 we can do it if you want
That's just the chain rule again
For instance
[\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial v}\right)=\frac{\partial}{\partial v}\left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial v}\right)\cdot\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial v}\right)\cdot\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}]
it says failed to render
Omg, give me a sec haha
no problem man
bondalton
hmm
It's just the chain rule applied to $\frac{\partial g}{\partial v}$
bondalton
So, you see how like $z$ depends on two variables and you used the chain rule here in a similar fashion?
bondalton
yup
Same thing with $g$, it depends on two variables and it's partial derivative depends on those two variables as well
bondalton
thats where you lose me because g isnt a variable its a function
I cant grasp my head around that
The thing is that $z$ is also a function! Indeed, $z=z(f(u),g(v))$, so $z$ is a function of $u$ and $v$
bondalton
Ok
but I know the behavior of the function Z tho
how would you write g(u)=
sry f(u)
in order to derivate it
all we know is the value of u
Well, $f(u)=f(x-y)$
bondalton
yup
And that's as much as we know about $f$ and $g$
bondalton
I agree
BUT we are assuming that $u$ and $v$ are functions of $x$ and $y$
bondalton
Indeed, writing $u=x-y$ for example
yes because of the variable change we did at the begening
bondalton
So taking the $y$-derivative of $u$ makes sense right?
bondalton
if I continue down this path do you think at one point its going to prove the equality?
Totally!
would you have chosen a different game plan that is shorter?
I know someone told me to evalute both sides of the equation and see if we end up with the same value but he didnt try it
I would've tackled the problem in a straight forward manner
Pretty much all you did, but without the $u$'s and $v$'s
bondalton
That's the thing, I wouldn't use a tree
But that's just me
Try to use what I told you, give it a shot ๐
ill try it
do you think after I use it ill be close to it?
we still havent touched the x^2
also where are the d/dx gonna come from?
I have trouble viewing how we can end up with the left expression ngl
Yup, it's just tons of work and chain rules
can I show you what my teacher did?
Sure!
because idk why but I feel im doing it 4 times longer than her
Her game plan was the same but instead of going from left to right , she did right to left
This is what she wrote on the board
I got inspired by her to do similar
Yes! She's doing the same thing I'm telling you, applying the chain rule once more to the partial derivatives
No problem! ๐
is there a way to give a tip or its against the rules?
since u took a lot of time
its my first time using this server
also what are your credentials if I may ask just curious
No need for that, it's fun helping others ๐
Credentials? Like what am I studying?
I'm a grad math student
alr again thank you for your time
ah okay sounds cool im a first year engenieering student
Hey, good luck with the maths!
Yep, same trick, lots of work ๐ฆ
No problem!
.close
Closed by @devout oak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Equalavent pentagons neighboring sides are MN and NQ in that pentagon there is a point P so it makes MPN equalaveng triangle. Need to find angle NQP
Equivalent pentagon?
MNP is equal all sides are equal
So far ik that pentegons each angle is 108
Equal triangles every angle is 60
Are you sure?
Wdym?
Wait, is it what the question said?
If a triangles every side is equal all angles are 60 wdym
Itโs not equal
So i need to find angle NQP
Itโs loading
NP=NQ
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @main mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey i need a quick help with my activity just one here it is
i quite lack of knowledge at the moment and that is why I'm confused at 3 and 4 (reason side)
ah
so what do you notice with angle 2 and 3
the form two intersecting lines right?
meaning you can apply this
when you have opposite angles in an intersection like that
you can say that those opposite angles are congruent
for example, the blue ones have the same measurement with each other
while the yellow ones have the same measurement with each other
to be specific, these pair of angles are called "Vertical Angles"
so the reason will be
Vertical angles are ???
@cloud token Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need to find the black parts area if one legs middle point is connected to the other legs corners.
@main mica Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what's the original question?
there isn't enough info here
Trapezoid
then you can split it into two parts
with 3 lines parallel to each other
then you can
let l be lower base
let u be upper base
let h be height
and try to calculate the areas
The blu one is the middlelin right?
yes
note that the length middle line within the shape is (l+u)/2
Why/4??
hmmm
Mhh do i need a system?
Btw i think this can be done simpler were not using the legs middle line fact
Middle point
well, you'll just have to write and out and spot a pattern instead of solving for the variables
do you recall anything from here? @main mica
.close
Closed by @main mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me if my answers correct
@limpid heart Has your question been resolved?
@limpid heart Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @limpid heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I show that this diverges?
dont you need a limit
compare it to $\frac{\frac{-\pi}{2}}{x}$
y0shi
the lowest value arctan can give is -pi/2
ah, right, so it's always lower than that, and that diverges. I tried to compare it to $\frac{\frac{\pi}{2}{x}$, which obviously didn't work
Michael
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Hm
Don't think so no
but alright then I get it lol, thanks
.clos
.close
Closed by @potent rain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does it go from there
did you crop the image
you conveniently cropped out the important presence of the fraction and 3 in the denominator
sec^2(t)(1 + tan^2(t)) expands to
sec^2(t) + sec^2(t)tan^2(t)
you shouldn't know the integral of the first term
you could do a sub like u=tan(t) for the integral of the second term
ah so i go from this
sec^2(t) + sec^2(t)tan^2(t)
ok its not a one step solution right
ok ty
.close
Closed by @tame ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What am i doing wrong here????
How did my notes get those answers
0 + 2/5 โ2 |v| - 2/5 โ2 |z|= 0
5 โ38/38|u| - 3 โ38/38|v| - 3 โ38/38 |z| = 0
5 โ38/38 |u| + 5 โ38/38 |v|+ 5 โ38/38 |z|= 300
I plugged systems of equations into calculatorโฆ and it was onviously wrong
Answwre key says
@proper lintel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@proper lintel Has your question been resolved?
๐ฆ
I am cooked
Noone can solve this
PLEAAASEEE ::(((
Itโs over
It is so over
@proper lintel Has your question been resolved?
No, but I donโt need it to be resolved anymore
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is like 9th grade math but I haven't learned everything yet, so I am I need of help!
The figure shows two squares (black lines) with parallel sides. The big square
has side length 3 and the small one has side length 2. What is the area of โโthe blue shaded quadrilateral?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
the area is the sum of 4 triangles + the square
we know the square's area
so we need to find the sum of the 4 triangles' area
the area of a traingle is base*height/2
use that to solve the problem
I got about all the info that is the triangles bases are 2 but I can't find the heights
The height of like the whole thing?
the sum of the heights of the triangles
all the heights added together
how do you see that?
see what
The heights
the height is the perendicular distance from the opposite vertex to the base
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I haven't learned that and I can't understand that sentence
lemme translate
Yeah, I got all that but all the heights like different
but the sum?
How do you find the sum?
well look at the sum of the heightns of triangles on opposite sides
what do you notice?
They're bigger
no
and 2 of them are the same?
no
what????1!! im so dumb
hint: 3-2
1?
what does 3-2 represent here
the height between them? like its fully in the middle?
wdym
ok i'll just give you the hint
yeah ty
the sum of opposite heights is 1
let the first height be x, and the second be y
then we have x+y+2=3
because the sidelength fo the big square is 3
and the side length of the small sqyare is 2
the 2 heights and the side length fo small square comprise of the side length of the big square
are we talking about the heights of the bottom one and the one that is over?
or the sideways one?
right to left
either one
Okay can you just give the answer for now and I'll figure it out
sorry we cant do that
translate
is it this
Okay but, my school we do geometry last semester so I haven't learnt everything
So this is like unknown
And I still don't understand in my native language
the sum of the opposite heights is 1

