#help-33
1 messages · Page 108 of 1
@rocky lava Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185>
my bad
but pls help
i’ve been waiting for so long
i will actually forever be indebted to you
how can we help
aight
like it’s going down
oh
like a frown
yea
what
my fault
but it has to be <0
which
Closed by @rocky lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am incredibly stuck on uncertainties
Im guessing there’s a rule that means if you square an uncertainty it’s the same as multiplying it by 2, kinda like indices but I don’t understand the +2 whatsoever
Are you supposed to get this through differentiation?
No I was taught differentiation after uncertainties so I don’t think they’re related
but then I forgot all about uncertainties
@zinc sparrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey!
I'm having trouble with quadratic formula. I got 2.5 and 2.69, but that's incorrect, and I'm now confused - actually I was always confused, but that's ok
it's in my book, but I can try type it out
it really doesn't
you can send a pic
I don't have my phone on me atm sadly
-5^2-4x1x-1
so its equal to?
-25+4
anyway if youd get -21 there would be no solutions
so, -(-5)/2 is 5/2, and the other one would be sqrt 29/2
no 😭
I'm so lost here 😭
first is -(-5)+sqrt(29)/2
NO NO NO
and second -(-5)-sqrt(29)/2
solve D first
he solved D first
here
what did he get
29
show me your work
oh thats what happened, that's where I got lost
well what did you get?
so the answers would be 5.19 and -0.19?
so I just missed this fact, good to know
thank you all! :)
.close
Closed by @harsh iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
anyone here can with me with my data management homeowrk?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I solve for
@thin cove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it shouldnt
@lyric kelp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
reference angle
?
dont think so
thats not my answer
but
you would add 360
ti -461 right
and then do again so its positive
and then to the x axis
wait no
i tihnk its right
is it right
cuz -461 + 360 = -101
then +360 again
which is 259
that to the x axis
is 259-180=79
because 259 still in quadrant 3
-461+360=-101
this is in quadrant 3
the angle from the negative x axis to there is 79
from the positive x axis is 180+79=259
unless i misunderstand reference angle (I was)
im not that familiar with it
ah okay
yeah 79
Closed by @dull yew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
we want to see if this series converges or diverges
we want to use direct comparison test
an is the series, what would bn be?
you can maybe split the sum into 1/e^n and cos(n)/e^n
then determine if each one converges
if at least one of them diverges then the entire thing diverges
cos(n)/e^n???
how do i find out is that diverges or converges
all I did was split the numerator
the first term should be a geometric series and the second one can use direct comparison I think
let me write it out
|r|<1 yes
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{e^n} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos(n)}{e^n}$
Triaxyz
I believe for the second term you can compare it to $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{e^n}$ because it's an alternating function from -1 to 1

Triaxyz
i would like to suggest $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \left|\frac{\cos(n)}{e^n}\right| \leq \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{e^n}$$ instead
sl²a²y
but i would also like to suggest not splitting it up in the first place
just use the fact that $0 \leq1+\cos(n)\leq 2$ for any $n$
sl²a²y
also no
?
you mean adding for example a convergent value to a divergent value doesn't yield a divergent value?
no
i think what you wanted to say was "if exactly one of them diverges then the entire thing diverges"
we can have $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$ and $\sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n$ divergent but $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n+b_n$ convergent
sl²a²y
that is true but you didn't answer my question
this one?
yes
didnt see the answer mb
@glass silo 
@muted solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i know which formula to use definitional or computational..
the top one makes more sense to think about but you usually use the bottom when doing problems
so i can use any will that make a difference in my question or no??
also in some questions its not very clear if either they have given frequency or X so how am i supposed to figure if its grouped data or ungrouped
@fading cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with part B
@lethal galleon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Use properties of expectations: E[Y] = E[40X - 0.4X^2] = E[40X] - E[0.4 X^2] = 40 E[X] - 0.4 E[X^2]
Then given the expected value and variance of a binomial distribution
You can figure it out
i did that but my answer is still wrong
What did you do next then?
Yeah
Ahhhh $E[X^2] \ne (E[X])^2$
south
Those two are very, very different
right i see
Do you know the formula Var X = E[X^2] - (E[X])^2
i think i do, i rmb doing something similar for a different question
let me check my notes
Yeah it definitely should be in your notes
Anyway that's how to find the value of E[X^2]
You know Var X is np(1 - p)
And you know E[X] = np as you told me
No worries
Closed by @lethal galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! I meed help understanding the geometric demonstration of the next problem:
so
i have find for which r (the radius created by the modulus of z-3i) the system |z|=1 and |z-3i|=r has only one solution
and my teacher said that this is happening only when the circles formed by both the modulus are tangent
and i will get r=2 or r=4
and my question is, what really is the intersection between these circles?
and why do we get the answer by intersecting them?
some materials that explain this would really help me
Essentially all points that satisfy the above given modulus equalities lie on the respective circles. We want there to be a number which satisfies both equalities so it should lie on both circles
If it is lying on both circles, it is nothing but their intersection point
Simple observation will tell you that the circle can either cut at two points, not cut at all, or cut at exactly one point
If they cut each other at exactly one point then there will be exactly point which lies on both circles, hence exactly one z which satisfies both equalities
Hence only one solution of the problem
So we want the circles to 'touch'
yes … but i still have a question
lets say the circles are not tangent
why is there no z that satisfies the equations?
i mean… two circles are still formed
As I said, the point which satisfies the equation should always lie on the circle
And for it to simultaneously lie on two circles
It HAS to be the intersection point
do you have any materials reffering this?
i mean, i understand that this right
but something seems off in my mind
considering the circles are tangent in that point
how do i know the same z satisfies the equations?
and the intersection between the circles is only the peak of the modulus
that shouldnt really represent something
but it does
When we say it lies on the circle |z|=1 we mean it's distance from the origin is 1
So it contains all points being at a distance of 1 from origin
i.e. a circle
Why shouldn't it
The circle represents all points at a certain distance from a certain point
And when we say a point is at that very distance from the centre
We mean it's ON the circle
The point where they 'touch' is at a distance of T( whatever that symbol is) from 3i
bruh i think i lack information somewhere
And at the same time
At a distance 1 from 0
So it satisfies both the equalities
i mean i understand the equality between two functions represents the points where they intersect
however when it comes to complex numbers , the problems are brain rotting me
okey
They've given you a point (0,3) and want a point at a certain distance away from it
That should represent a circle
alright…and my radius is variable
yes
Yes
And then we have another circle centred at origin
Which represents the first equation
Now say the circles don't touch, that means AMONG ALL the points on the one centered at (0,3), none is lying on the other circle, that means among them none is at a distance of 1 from the origin, that means among them none is satisfying the first equation
It is only when they intersect
That we get a point
Which simultaneously lies on both
so the intersection would satisfy both circles equations ? (x^2+y^2=1 and x^2 + (y-3)^2=r^2
Yes
You can go ahead and set the D=0 there of the quadratic you get
You'll arrive at the same answer/conclusion
hm…
something starts to sort in my mind
but it still comes back to the question “ it’s the same complex number that creates both moduluses?
Wdym
i mean , as you can see , the complex number can be represented as a line in the complex plane. If we take r=2 the circles are “exterior tangent”. and the intersection between the two circles is given by a conplex number that is pointing up and one that is plinting down
pointing*
Not quite, there's only one position vector for one complex number
now i know im lacking information somewhere
ok!
i will look through my 10th year book 💀
thank you for helping me out!
.close
Closed by @orchid wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
It's not that
It's -arccos(1/7)
If x = arcsec 7, sec x = 7
cos x = 1/7
npnp
.close
Closed by @lyric kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a little question about variables, suppose I’m solving an equation and I get 2+5x, there the equation can still be solved?, as far as I understand 2 and 5x are different things, so those values can’t be added, subtract, multiply or divide among themselves, please could they help me better understand that part?
a couple of things:
2+5x is an expression not an equation because it doesn't have an equal sign
you can simplify expressions but for this one you have the right idea that this cannot be further simplified.
in which cases an expression could be simplified?
if you have "like terms" for example 4x + 7x could be simplified to 11x
and no matter what value x is, those two things will be the same
Another example, in the case of 2+5x=7, I think that could be solved by passing the terms on the other side of the same, right?
yes, in this case you have an equation and so you're allowed to manipulate each side however you want, as long as you do the same to both sides
so you could subtract 2 from both sides, as you're suggesting
Ok thanks!
Thank you for helping me understand that point.
.close
Closed by @stiff swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, what's the use of injection in set theory ?
in set theory
this thing?
yes
I mean...
what is both an example of application and an analogy of injective functions in human interactions?
For example let's consider a table of relations (human number and names) as a function,
10 folks have a name , then it's not injective on an imaginary set I don't know how to define it but that is defind by possible names (some king of regex for the names) : because two different people can have the same name, it can't be injective
But the relation between names and people is a surjective function kinda because one name can correspond to more than one person.
What do you think? How right is it? Do you have practical examples closer to the truth maybe?
In every potential example there should be the mention of a range, to be compared to function types it seems
@dreamy swift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where am i going wrong in this intergral
@drifting ingot Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
damn it should be 1/y^2?
yeah
Closed by @drifting ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the sides of a parallelogram if their lengths are 8:19, and the diagonals of the parallelogram are 15 cm and 25 cm.
mistake
actually before i give any hints
what exactly are you stuck on
do you need somewhere to begin or are you partway
I'm stuck at the beginning
ok so
I can only say that the sides are 8x and 19x
lets say that we have two unknowns, the sides of the parallelogram
yeah perfect
so now its in terms of one variable, yes?
yes
now you just have to use whatever is in your toolset to attack the problem
hint: Pythagorean theorem
draw altitudes
so
from triangle ABD need to find AD?
oh no
but from the triangle I only have 8x
ok now
is there some information here that youd like that would help you?
what information would you really like to have
yeah you want x, but if you tried to use Pythagorean theorem to solve for x
what happens?
try to apply Pythagorean here
but I only know the hypotenuse
so (BF) is perpendicular to (AD) right?
you dont only have the 8x
yes
you also have the 19x
ok thx
and the diagonals
why are you assuming thats the only right triangle to try?
i see lots and lots of right triangles
😉
hmmmm
this?
But I don’t know if it’s possible to say that the side is 25:2
but is that a right triangle?
if its not a right triangle you cant use Pythagorean theorem
it can be if ABCD is a rhombus
except its not
this?
does that feel like a right triangle?
not really
actually i think we can work something out with this triangle
using trig laws or something
because CD is 8x
how about try triangle BFD
I think this can be solved more simply, but how?
this?
but in it we only have BD
true, but are you scared of making more variables?
check this out
let BF = h, since its the height
AF = d just because i like that letter here
can you write an expression for FD?
using x, d, h
FD=AD-d
good, but what is AD
19x
perfect
FD=19x-d
also dont forget you can drop altitudes outside the shape too
drop an altitude from C
down to the ground next to AD
extend AD
yeah give that bad boy corner a name
that?
we only have AC
ohhhh I forgot that we decided that it was h
19x+d
bingo
so now we have three triangles
BFA, BFD, ACE
all right triangles
write out Pythagorean for each one, you get 3 equations
but look, you have 3 variables!
isnt that promising?
state Pythagorean theorem
?
after you have it stated correctly, we can check to see if we applied it correctly
what is the Pythagorean theorem?
what does it say?
the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the legs
yep
but i dont see any squaring in your equation
i see the edit
dont sqrt yet, just keep it as squares
because you are going to be manipulating the equation
its going to be way harder to do stuff when its inside the sqrt
good
now do the other two equations and solve for x
unfortunately i gotta go so
good luck, sorry i cant see this through
But I’m thinking, isn’t there a theorem (The sum of the squares of the diagonals of a parallelogram is equal to twice the sum of the squares of its two adjacent sides)?
.close
Closed by @visual wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Easy question here, but I don't understand how the answer is C instead of B, I did got 2/5 but apparently I have to add 1/3 and I don't understand why
did you maybe compute the distance between 1/3 and x? then you would have to add 1/3 to reach what x actually is, if that's what you mean
@lavish granite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i did (7/9-1/3)*9/10
.reopen
✅
and got 0.4
yeah so do you see why that isn't the answer?
your calculation is correct but it's just the distance between 1/3 and x, now what is the coordinate of x?
oh yea i understand that
but i dont get why i need to add 1/3
so do you understand or do you not
you just said you understand but then you asked a question showing you don't =\
i don't know which to believe
ok, say i have the coordinate x = 2 and another coordinate 5 to the right of it on the x axis, what coordinate is the second one?
so same idea, does that clear it up?
@lavish granite Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lavish granite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
May someone check question 13 to see if I did it right
@red sierra Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@red sierra Has your question been resolved?
what's your answer?
If I'm not wrong, rotating by pi/2 clockwise means you add pi/2 to the angle
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let us call a whole number "lucky" if its digits can be divided into two
groups so that the sum of the digits in each group is the same. For
example, 34175 is lucky because 3 + 7 = 4 + 1 + 5. Find the smallest 4-
digit lucky number, whose neighbour is also a lucky number (i.e. the
whole number next to it is a lucky number as well).
Let us call a whole number "lucky" if its digits can be divided into two
groups so that the sum of the digits in each group is the same. For
example, 34175 is lucky because 3 + 7 = 4 + 1 + 5. Find the smallest 4-
digit lucky number, whose neighbour is also a lucky number (i.e. the
whole number next to it is a lucky number as well).
<@&286206848099549185>
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
@faint hare Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have to find the zeros of this but I don’t understand
zeros of what?
could you type in in TeX
trying to solve $e^{\sin\left(x\right)}\cos\left(x\right)$?
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
@fringe prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you simplify this? ((1/x) - (1/8))/(x-8)
$((1/x) - (1/8))/(x-8)$
wakamole
how do i simplify this?
you can multiply the top and bottom by x
you could also multiply the top and bottom by 8 to get rid of the fraction
?
how
a/b = 8a/8b
$\frac8/8x - \fracx/8x$
damn that fdidnt work
i got a common denominator
8/8x - x/8x
so thats 8-x / 8x ?
those two things are equal yea
ok then that over x-8
how do i simplify it
ok well think about it
if i divide a by b, and then divide that by c
thats the same as dividing by b * c
right?
b times c?
yea
no
= 4/(2*1) = 2
you can see that its true by multiplying both sides by bc
((a/b)/c) * bc = a/b * b = a
and (a/bc) * bc = a
at any rate, you can use (a/b)/c = a/bc to simplify your equation
since you have something of that form
i do?
good
so bring down the 8x
yep
so its 8-x / (8x/x-8)
no
i dont get it then
reread this
oh mulitply
sry
no worries
8-x / 8x(8-x)
so thats 8-x / -8x^2 - 64
or 8 -x / 8x(-x-8)
?
im actually trying to find the limit as x approaches 8
thats correct
i did this calculation already but wolfram is saying it is -1/64
idk how it got that
i already got that equation but thought i did something wrong
i think so too
i dont think the limit of what you sent exists as x -> 8
wait
maybe im being silly
ok fair
this is fromwolfram
from this eq or my simplified
ill think for a sec
ok this is the actual problem
oh
you can factor this out
there is an error here
it should be -x+8 on the bottom
that allows you to cancel it out
but it is 8-x on topp
yeah and 8-x on the bottom
and x-8 on bottom
ha
ok
hold up
omg
that was so confusing
i didnt know you can cancel out if they are revrerse signs
like
for ex
oh ok i get it
well (x-3)/(3-x) = -(x-3)/(x-3) = -1
yea that doesnt simplify
yes
np
Closed by @rigid kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i guessed 1 but i have no idea why that was correct
why are you guessing? you have the hint, work with it.
so i make it $e^x(1+e^-x)) / e^x(1-e^-x))$
wakamole
you can cancel those out??
it should be $\frac{e^x(1+e^{-2x})}{e^x(1-e^{-2x})}$ instead
y0shi
take e^x out u will have 1+e^-2x/1-e^-2x substitute limit e^-infinity is 0 ur answer is 1
since if you distribute what you have up there, it wouldn’t go back to your original result
thank you and why -2x?
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
well try distributing the e^x back in
oh right exponent mult is addition and subtraction
ok but still
how can you cancel them out thoufh
its positve e on top and negative on bottom
ok so how would you take the limit of whats left over
well what’s the $\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} e^{-2x}$?
y0shi
i dont know how to do that yet i just startefd learnin limits last week in class and our teacher didnt teach us with 'e'
okay so we can rewrite that as $\frac{1}{e^{2x}}$
y0shi
gets bigger
i meatn thee fraction getssmaale
so how is that 1 then
the value of the fraction would go to what
we’ll get there
yep
so if you plug that in whenever you see e^-2x
it will all turn to 0
which leaves only 1 in the denominator and the numerator
which evaluates to 1
oh if we have $a^{-b}$ that’s equal to $\frac{1}{a^b}$
y0shi
i dont get how we went from (1+e^-2x)/(1-e^2x) = $\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} e^{-2x}$? = $\frac{1}{e^{2x}}$
wakamole
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
well it’s not necessarily equal to that
we’re just observing what happens to that e^-2x
ok instead of = ->
when x goes to infinity
ok
but what happened to the equation
its just e^-2x in the limit all of a sudden
ill have to ask my tutor at school in person might be easier i have to go to the bathrooo,
alright
ok that leaves us with (1+ex^-2x)/(1-ex^-2x)
not just e^-2x
Yes
so why is the lim -> inf = e^-2x @open kayak
So we have $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1 + e^{-2x}}{1 - e^{-2x}}$ after cancelling out
yep
Well now think about what happens to those + e^(-2x) and - e^(-2x) terms
As x goes to infinity
Will those get large, will those get small, ...
E.g. is e^(-100000000000000) a big or a tiny number
small
Yes
It's not, he just meant to ask you exactly what I asked you
"Will it become huge, will it become tiny, ..."
thats why i was confused cause it just left the building
so the equation is still lim -> inf = (1+e ^-2x) / (1 - e ^ -2x)
e^, not ex^
$\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1 + e^{-2x}}{1 - e^{-2x}}$
Kepe
No, we of course care about the whole thing
cause they have highest order
We just looked at them to see what happens to them
yea
ok
thx!
i think i get it more now
i still have some questions but im too tired
but i will figure it out
thanks
np
Closed by @rigid kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do anyone know how to do these types of questions
use middle-term splitting method example 1st ques 6x^2-7x+2 multiply Coefficient of x^2 and constant( say some a ) and express coeffecient of x as product of a , so 6 x 2 = 12 and -7 can be written as -4+-3 ,-4x -3 = 12
huh?, can you explain it more i still don't get it
but how do you do question24 then
treat y as constant
do the same thing
x^2 +5xy - xy -5y^2 , here coeffecient (5y) x( -y ) = -5y^2 which is constant term
oh
i do the same process for all questions right
yea
Closed by @rugged wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me with the second part?
how did your argument go for the first part
for the second part you should carefully look at how you used positivity of the weights
First, we show that the subset of edges of minimum total weight that connects all the vertices is a tree. To see this, suppose not, that it had a cycle.
This would mean that removing any of the edges in this cycle would mean that
the remaining edges would still connect all the vertices, but would have a total
weight that’s less by the weight of the edge that was removed. This would contradict the minimality of the total weight of the subset of vertices. Since the
subset of edges forms a tree, and has minimal total weight, it must also be a
minimum spanning tree.
I think i have alreadt figured it out
If you have a graph with 3 vertices that is a cycle. and all edges have weight -1 that means the minimum weight would be -3 but this would mean that a tree with 3 vertices would have 3 edges which means it cant be a tree.
I still have to word it better
but this is the general idea
yes that works
Closed by @fallen yew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did 4w become 4w^3
multiply by w^2
where did they get the w^2?
to get rid of the w^-2
u can do that??
whay is (w^2)(w^-2)
w^-4?
no
oh wait its 0
no
oh
@true bluff Has your question been resolved?
@true bluff Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @true bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong with this 3D summation approximation.
@merry mulch Has your question been resolved?
@merry mulch Has your question been resolved?
@merry mulch Has your question been resolved?
@merry mulch Has your question been resolved?
@merry mulch Has your question been resolved?
@merry mulch are you sure you did the calculation right?
I'm not a pro on numerical integration but the formula looks right to me?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Asked to deduce how therea = 360sin(a/2) (where a= vertical angle) of a cone, while considering the arc length of the sector (l, l behind theta/360 * 2pir)from which the cone is formed, hitting a roadblock
previous question asked to deduce how r (r being the radius of the base) is equal to s * sina/2 like this (picture) but unsure how to do the other one
@drowsy sundial Has your question been resolved?
@drowsy sundial Has your question been resolved?
I may have not been in the correct mode for angles 
lmao sorry fam
i just got suspicious since your answer was so close to the total volume of the 5x5x5 box itself even though cosine should be sufficiently smaller than 1 most of the time
Apparently no matter how high of a math level I make it to, the wrong mode is still going to haunt me
What is theta?
maybe you can draw up a quick picture in paint, that would probably help you and any helper
yeah sure bear with me
not the best artist but lmk if this is what you need
ye i think that helps
Oh so the idea is that you make the cone out of this sector by pushing the edges together?
so the radius of the sector is equal to the side s of the cone, right
yeah exactly, it's investigating the dimensions that are changed/added when this happens
yup
Now I'm just wondering if you're making the cone out of the big sector (with angle theta) or the small sector
Big one, small one is just discarded
gotcha! never seen that problem before but i'll think about it a bit
it definitely clears things up
yeah, pretty interesting 😁, it's an investigation/assignment so not just a problem, this is literally the last part i haven't done, fucking with my head 😹
cheers
Were you able to do anything with the "by considering the arc length" comment of the exercise?
I was trying to do something with it, as part of the investigation was using l = θ/360 * 2pi * r but couldnt get anywhere
and the arc length of the sector is equal to the circumference of the cone's base (C=2piR) but couldnt really get anywhere
awh you're so close man
😭 really
what do you get when you set these two equal?
solid, so getting rid of the 2pi you have theta/360 = R
uuuh with another r
theta/360 *r = R
can you think of any way you can bring your angle alpha/2 into this equation
uhhh
hm wait
bro i just know im so close i was looking at it like this before
i did something similar to this before i think on another question
fuck
it's always the same with trigonometric problems
u can do it fam, give it a couple minutes
hmm
what do you mean by get rid of it
you already know that s is equal to some other variable
and it's easier if you have less variables in the system, so just replace s with the other variable and forget about s
but i might be confusing you so don't take what i'm saying too seriously hahaha
nah its alright lol
ohhh
oh i get what you mean
replace s with r?
haha alright alright
idk man right now i'm at θ/360 R = R/r
oh sorry for ghosting you
wait how did you get that
dw about it
no yeah youre right i did have it like that
you just need to bring those two equations together now
holy fuck yeah i think i got it
wait give me one sec
okok so
theta/360 * r = r * sin(alpha/2)
based
yes sir
the geometric construction of this 3d-object out of a 2d circle sector might seem complicated mathematically
but all you needed is to rely on this construction keeping the radius of the original disk the same, and the circumference of the original sector
b/c that translated to r = s and theta/360 = R
super cool & super nice
so you don't always need to understand everything about a complicated system, it's enough to understand what things don't change
the math pros call that the invariants of the system
that was fun, good luck with your math future
yeah yeah, i have trouble with visualising stuff like this which makes it a little hard but thanks for the nudge, understand it really well now man cheers
i will 👍