#help-33
1 messages · Page 79 of 1
it looks like the a-c=7 but theres a + instead and it has an exponent
Have u not seen this identity?
(A-b)²
If not we shall continue with what you were doing
we didnt learn that i believe
Ok then
So a-c=7
So a=c+7
Converting to 1 variable will not help you
Also 2a-2c is not 7
It is 14
OHH
oopsies
so then a² + 14 + c² - 2ac
?
sory id ont know
qait buy
but
a = c - 7 too, no?
or not
@sour flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure what i’m doing wrong
first i find the scale factor, then work out the perpendicular height of the small cone, then of the frustum but something keeps going wrong and im not sure where
<@&286206848099549185>
@silent gulch Has your question been resolved?
you probably calculated the height of the original cone, which is x+5
Closed by @silent gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In every living organism, the radioactive carbon isotope C14 can be detected in a certain constant ratio to normal carbon. If an organism dies, it no longer absorbs C14 and the existing C14 disintegrates with a half-life of 5730 years.
How do I calculate the growth factor?
<@&286206848099549185>
@modest shuttle Has your question been resolved?
why do people call decay as growth factor lol
more accurate to be phrased as decay factor
use the formula
$N(t)=N_0*(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{t}{T_{1/2}}$
$Pure2$
tbh I’ve never seen that formula in school, we never used something like that. Are there other solutions as well?
.close
Closed by @modest shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a way to write (1) as (2)?
whats k1 k2
and what's with ( )
you can set them equal and solve for ( )
Closed by @tough abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just wanting to check my wording would achieve all 4 marks
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Given a<0, a is a negative value. 2^-n = 1/2^n, as n increases the fraction 1/2^n expontetially tends towards 0. as a -ve fraction gets closer to 0 it is becoming more positive (hence increasing)
@marsh blade Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @marsh blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How should I set up the trig equation for part a
The equation is already set up for you
How many days after dec 21 is dec 21?
burt how do I do part a
he just told u that i think
L(t) represents the length of daylight t days after dec 21
We've established that dec 21 is 0 days after dec 21
So trig equation = 0
So I don’t get what I’m supposed to do
If this is true, what is the value of t for dec 21?
remember that t represents the number of days after Dec 21st. We've already concluded that we have 0 days for part i. What does that make t?
0?
0
So the length of sunlight (modelled by L(t)) on dec 21 (where t=0) can be represented by what?
So L(0) = 12
L(0) I agree with, how did you get 12?
cos 0 is 1 i suppose
I think you need to go look at how L is defined
water beam can answer my questions well enough without your input, thanks
14 looks better
How indeed

The only part of L that changes over time is the cos() part, agree?
So you just need to show where the cos(...) function is at its lowest
I guess? Sorta
Not sure what that means tho
You have to find the value of t that minimizes L(t)
but how do I do that?
By finding this
It's very similar but not exactly the same
For which value of x does cos(x) reach its smallest value? (Only looking at x in the interval [0, 2pi])
just the regular cosx?
Yep
Well don't guess, I need a surefire answer
Ok yes, it's pi
cos(x) is minimized when x = pi; similarly, cos(2pit/366) is minimized when 2pit/366 = pi

If cos is minimized at -1, then what is the minimal value of 12+2cos(...)
T = -1?
We're not solving for t
It's asking what the smallest value of L is, when I thought it asked where the smallest value of L occurs
The value of L, not the input
If we found the t that minimized cos(...), and plugged that t in, what would be L(t)
t = -1?
so I’m solving for t?
No
There is some value of t such that cos(2pit/366) = -1. At that value of t, what is the value of L(t)?
To be as explicit as possible, you are not solving for t. You are computing L(t)
If we don’t do L(-1) and not solving for t and not doing t=-1
I don’t know what to do
If x = -1 what is 12 + 2x?
If cos(2pit/366) = -1 what is 12 + 2cos(2pit/366)?
Can you find the smallest value of L(t)?
It’s 10
It's 10
The next one will probably feel even more confusing
oh bruh I didn’t see that
Is that 11 = trig equation
If so I’m pretty cracked at trig equations ngl
Yes
@lethal bridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi ! I am watching a '3b1b lecture' on Complex Numbers. He is solving how to calculate cos(75°) using simple construction below. I do not however get why does he only multiply the real part and the imaginary part , which in the end will cancel out the imaginary part and only leave the real part { is this the reason , or is there a deeper mathematical meaning behind this?} Thanks!
because cos theta is the real part of the complex number cos theta + i sin theta
$e^{i75}=e^{i45}.e^{i30}$ or cos(75)+i sin (75) = cos(45+i sin 45) (cos 30 + i sin 30) and he's solving only for cos 75 which is the real part
JS
So in that case, he multiplies the imaginary parts because the multiplication results in a real number?
yeah $i^2 = -1$ so if you multiply the two imaginaries together you'll get a real...
JS
Thanks!
@graceful turtle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @graceful turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does the u-sub match in the first question but not the second?
@glad vapor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glad vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help pls
,rotate
Do I make it xy^1/2=1
Then sqrtxy=sqrt1
Then make x the sub of the formula
why are you sqrt the 1
@orchid breach Has your question been resolved?
just raise it to the power of 2!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'd like help solving the first one. Then I'll do the second, and would appreciate a confirmation of my answer
$(4x+9)^{\frac{1}{2x}}=e^{\ln\left[(4x+9)^{\frac{1}{2x}}\right]}$
Soosh
you can start off with something like this, now you can use the exponent rule for logarithms to take the 1/2x in front of the ln
and your limit can be rewritten as e^ lim of...
$\frac{\ln(4x+9)}{2x}$
Soosh
now try lhopitals on that
So its 1
Bc the limit ends up as 0
And e^0 is 1
Got it
Thank you, I'll do the other problem on my own
Could you confirm my work for this?
Not sure if I did it wrong
If there is anything wrong, would you mind working me through this too :(
Wdym
it's multiply by (-4/x^2)
Oh damn wait you're right
Ah
This ends up as another indeterminant form
Bc its 0*infinity
Ugh
you can do this a different way
*10x^2
$\frac{\cos\left(\frac{4}{x}\right)\left(-\frac{4}{x^{2}}\right)}{\frac{-1}{10x^{2}}}=\cos\left(\frac{4}{x}\right)\left(-\frac{4}{x^{2}}\right)\left(-10x^{2}\right)$
cos(0) is 1
CH3
Yeah
no need to use lhopitals at all
1 times 0 times -infinity so 0*infinity
$\cos\left(\frac{4}{x}\right)\left(-\frac{4}{x^{2}}\right)\left(-10x^{2}\right)=40\cos\left(\frac{4}{x}\right)$
CH3
HUH??
x^2 and 1/x^2 divide
you can use use $\lim_{x\to0}\frac{\sin x}{x}=1$
without applying lhopitals at all
oh yeah that works too
Soosh
well whatever works
I mean if that were easier I'd do that
But given we're supposed to be applying what we've learned from the chapter
Im stuck with l'hop
How do I tackle this?
Am I supposed to do common denom
$\frac{1}{2x}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}=\frac{1}{2x}-\frac{2\sqrt{x}}{2x}$
CH3
I'm still lost😭
which is also equal to $\frac{1-2\sqrt{x}}{2x}$
CH3

make a new tickett
This is just dne then right
should be positive infinity
Bc I mean you dont really have to L'Hop anything after this step
Since its 1-0/0
Or 1/0
Which is just pos infinity yeah
But that can also be written as dne no?
Lol
I mean the limit is said to not exist at infinity bc it isnt set in real numbers right
So you can write infinity as dne?
well i don't think that's right so just write infinity
because dne would be something like 1/x as x->0, it would be negative infinity from the left and positive from the right
while in this case it's infinity
lol
For this
And you're free ofc to not help if you're tired, etc
I ask many question I sorry
But for this
it's ok lol
yeah
e^ln(5x^2+2^4/ln(x))
Then I just
Do the limit of ln(5x^2+2^4/ln(x))
Yes
Itll be a product rule
you wrote this right? $e^{\frac{4\ln\left(5x^{2}+2\right)}{\ln\left(x\right)}}$
CH3
yep
also i don't see a product rule
wuh
How do you type this out so fast
desmos lol
copy paste from desmos
Ohh
i don't see how this is the case
oh wait
i see what you mean
but that's wrong
But
remember l'hopital
Yes
I must
No ik
I was js
Oh wait
Yeah
It wouldnt have worked
Bc I have to have a quotient
Yes
Lol sorry
Im burning out and I still have like 6 word problems to do after this
Plus a practice exam
i feel you lol
$\frac{\frac{4\left(10x\right)}{5x^{2}+2}}{\frac{1}{x}}=4\left(\frac{10x^{2}}{5x^{2}+2}\right)$
CH3
nope if you l'hopital on the above it becomes 4(20x/10x) which is just 4(2)
?

Then l'hop that
I see
Thats where I messed up
Threw my problem way off
So it all becomes e^8
Got it
Now these I hate more
We know Area = l*w or in other words
A=x*y
The diagram for this would be something like
Right
So the equation is
A=2x*3y
wouldn't x be y
they said "x be the length of the shared side"
no
Brain hurt
no
But we have a total of 2000
the perimeter is equal to 2000
No
Ah
Yeah
Idk
Like the last problems I at least had an idea of what to do
But these are like being blind
the perimeter is just the sum of all sides
My worst problems
so 4x + 3y
4x + 3y = 2000
So we just solve for y
actually since we replaced x by y
it would be 4y + 3x = 2000
Right
so find y in terms of x
yep
Hm
Okay
I mean
This seems weird
Bc for the first equation
y=500/3x
So when we plug in
We get 2x(500/3x)
From here
its 1000x/3x right
wuh
4y + 3x = 2000
4y=2000-3x
y = (2000-3x)/4
take a break
🫡
lol
So
Using that equation
and plugging in
We're left with 2000x-3x^2/2
Do I like
Differentiate this
Then set it to 0?
find the maximum yeah

OKAY BUT LIKE
I DID IT WRONG
AND STILL END UP WITH 1000/3
Lmaooo
I love that
Hmm
Idk
lol but at first you found the area to be equal to 1000/3
but this time it's x = 1000/3
yes
2000(1000/3)*3(1000/3)^2/2
Im not allowed calculators on my exam later
So it has to be in my head
And that seems like
(x(2000-3x))/2 at x = 1000/3 -> 1000/3 (2000-1000)/2 -> 500(1000)/3
do you have the answer?
same thing
are you asking what to do or are you saying what you're going to do
no
Kill me

And my dad is cool
Got it
Okokok one sec
0kok
I get 10/3
But
Thats wrong
Oh
Nvm
Im right
More suffer!
draw it, write out the coordinates and it should be easy
Similar process to the other problems right
somewhat yeah
@vivid river Has your question been resolved?
the whole area of this triangle is 18 so it's impossible to be 50
this is a new question...
i'm talking about this one
OH YEAH
LMFAO
OOPS
Theres 2 questions
That are similar MY BAD
LMAO
Oops
Sorry
So Im uh
Having trouble with this
Ill be having so solve for 2 equations right
Instead of 2xy
I have to do
x*y of one equation
Plus x*y of the other equation
Right
Is it not 9?
woops yeah it is
Have a great night or day
you too 
.close
Closed by @vivid river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
*buy me space engineer on steam *
lol

if i had the money
aww
alas i do not
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there some trick or easy way to break up a fraction? I assume the denominator is gonna be four but I cant figure out what to put for numerator.
Try that and tell us.
Closed by @ashen crown
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I do not know how to start the question. My math teacher said I need to use differentials
total derivative is the sum of the partials
so would i plug in 5% and 2% into r and h of the partials when im adding them?
sorry I dont know where to go from this point 😭
dV = pi r^2 dh + 2pi r h dr
actually not enough info
you also need r and h
you are only given dr and dh
yeah thats where i was stuck
😦
thank you for your help
ill try bringing this up with my math teacher
you cannot get a numerical answer here
because the percentage error gets arbitrarily large as r and h get arbitrarily small
because then you're just basically dividing by 0
oh dang
thank you so much for your help, im just gonna skip this one then 😭
.close
Closed by @coarse bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this good
yes, its correct
is that the final solution?
nvm i found it.
i have another problem i want help with, but i am trying to solve it myself first. pls wait
does anyone know what the derivative of square root of x is?
its
1/2(sqrt(x))
basically you are differentiating
x^(1/2)
you can use
y' = nx^(n-1)
this is the problem if you want to solve it. i need to solve g'(3.5) if g(x) = ...
do you have doubt in this?
in this question
you dont need to do this
wdym
its just
x^(1/2) / x^4
= x ^ (1/2 - 4)
= x ^ (-7/2)
ah
you know power gets subtracted when 2 same variables are in division?
never learned that
um, its basic
wait maybe you thinking something diffrent
do you know this?
you talking about x⁴ and x⁴?
x to the power 1/2 and x to the power 4
yes
I cant see the whole thing you have written but if its
x to the (-7/2)
then its correct
now you can put down the power (-7/2) in front as its in log and just differentiate
yes, you are going correct
now use this formula
to get -7/2 down
and differentiate
you have to find g'(x)
by the way you can tag me or reply to get my attention, I may not be looking here
What rule is that? And it says log instead of ln
this?
ln just means log base e
yes
i think i'm supposed to use derivative rules to solve this. the chapter is about derivatives. not really fair to simplify instead of using the chain rule or the product rule.
can we do both methods?
if you want you can absolutely just differentiate as it is now,
but maths is about making connections with all the chapters, the thing I told you was just to make things easy, if you want you can do it other way too!
chain rule ND division rule
yes you can use both
its just one can be easier than the other
so there are less chances for you to make mistakes
yeah
@agile sinew Has your question been resolved?
@spark condor
oops sorry I was eating
no no,
chain rule is applied when the variable you are differentiating is inside a function which is inside another function,
here (-7/2) act as a constant number so you take it out and just differentiate the "ln x" part
@agile sinew you knwo this??
um, okay
you forgot to differentiate
ln (sqrt(x)/x^4) first
$\ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}}$
anshu
i'm doing the inside of the parantheses first. then i will do chain rule for ln and (x)
okay
I will let you finish then send my method
ok
Here. Also brb
I dont understand what you just did here
honestly you dont have to even put half the work in second method
here it is
I have elongated the step for you to understand easily
its waaaaaay simpler
its this here. the chain rule
yes
I will explain the chain rule too
but just tell me first do you understand this?
wouldn't -7/2 be 0 if you use derivative? derivative of a constant is 0
yes, but its when its a constant term
like 1, 3, 4, 7, 2039, 12930, 1232134.41245
but if you got a x in the term you cant just write it as zero
like you cant write derivatives of these as zero
2x
4x
513x
heres the same thing in formula
you are saying the first thing
but you see here we have a function of x which is "ln x" here multiplied with 7/2
great! so now about chain rule as I said
you need to understand first whats g(x) and f(x) here
you have taken $\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}$ as g(x)
anshu
thereforce f(x) which means an outer funtion becomes $\ln{x}$
as you assume $\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}$ is x in the f(x)
anshu
nah this will confuse you more
wait lemme think how to explain it to you
do you know differentiation by subsitution?
no
um
how did you get to chain rule then?
chain rule is a short trick to do subsitutions faster
i used the quotient rule since $\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}$ is division
Crawling Ham
yes but you cannot forget that its inside a log function
ok lemme do it like this
LET t = $\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}$
anshu
so now you have $\ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}} = \ln{t}$
anshu
you understand this?
hmm. yeah
we use quotient rule to differentiate "t" here which is $\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}$
anshu
so $\frac{dt}{dx} = \frac{-7}{2x^4\sqrt{x}}$
anshu
this was the answer you got
yeah
now what we needed to do in the actual question was to differentiate $\ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}}$
anshu
and to do this i used the chain rule. thus $\ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}}$ becomes this
Crawling Ham
becomes?
$ln\left(x\right):=:\frac{1}{\frac{7}{2x⁴\sqrt{x}}}\cdot :\frac{7}{2x⁴\sqrt{x}}$
Crawling Ham
ln(x) being the original thing
isnt this equals to 1?
so your answer is 1?
but I got -1
didn't get that far. i'm stuck here lol
oh
its wrong basically
did you follow upto here?
wdym
I mean did you understand this statement so I can continue with this
I will tell you a interesting thing about this method in the last
i have understood
so you basically want $\frac{d \ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}}}{dx}$
anshu
just lemme know if you understand this by yes or no
ok so by question
$g (x) = \ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}}$
and you need $g'(x)$
anshu
yes
so this is basically $\frac{d}{dx} g(x)$
anshu
I just wrote ln function in place of g(x)
i get it now
okay
so now we are going to connect all the dots
we will be using this you sent earlier
ok
$\frac{d }{dx}\ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}} = \frac{d }{dt} \ln{t} * \frac{dt}{dx}$
anshu
I used this and wrote it as ln t
and multiplied and divided by dt
$\frac{d}{dx} \ln{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}} = \frac{d}{dx} \ln{t} = \frac{d }{dt} \ln{t} * \frac{dt}{dx}$
anshu
yeah
you know what $\frac{d }{dt} \ln{t}$ equals to?
anshu
$-\frac{7}{2x}$
Crawling Ham
anshu
1/x
anshu
yes?
yes
so here you got $\frac{d }{dt} \ln{t} * \frac{dt}{dx} = \frac{1}{t}* \frac{dt}{dx}$
anshu
so what i got wrong was $\left(\frac{1}{\frac{7}{2x⁴\sqrt{x}}}\right)$
Crawling Ham
do you understand this?
oh yeah true lol i used g'(x) instead of g(x)
?
yeah
we just then put in the value of t we assumed here : #help-33 message
and put in value of dt/dx we got here : #help-33 message
and you get your diffentiated function
$\frac{1}{\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x⁴}}\cdot \frac{7}{2x⁴\sqrt{x}}$
Crawling Ham
and the interesting thing I told you about earlier was
this whole process is called differentiation by subsitution, where you subsituted t in place of $\frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^4}$
and the more interesting thing about this is what you took g(x) in your solution is the t here!!
so you see how chain rule is short method of subsitution?
anshu
yes
yes
I think you understand now how chain rule works and what you did wrong in your solution
yep. i realized back here
by the way DONT FORGET YOUR MINUS!!
that too
now you just solve this you get g'(x)
then just replace x with 3.5 to get g'(3.5)
just lemme know what your final answer came by this method and we can wrap up
$:-\frac{7}{2x}:=:-\frac{7}{2\cdot 3.5}:=:-\frac{7}{7}:=:-1$
Crawling Ham
bullseye!
thanks
your welcome :)
.close
Closed by @agile sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone can help me to understand the green part? (RSA Algorithm) ,this is what I have done for now.
@buoyant quest Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @buoyant quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Everything up to you finding lambda looks ok
only thing i can think of is to chuck all the negative signs
The step where you plug lambda into the right side of your initial equation seems to be the mistake
what is lambda
$\lambda$
Steakanator
whats the mistake when plugging it in
the negative signs should cancel right?
Your initial equation involves Pe^(-4lambda), but when you plug it in, you seem to be treating it as Pe^lambda
The negatives and the 1/4 should both be affected
no b/c the initial equation was to find the half life that occured at 4 years
we don't know the time for quarter life
Ah right i misread that
Well the negatives should also cancel, hopefully that's the only issue
yeah i just put my answer into symbolab
it still ended giving me an 8
so ig you can just rewrite it like that
log(1/x) = -log(x) so you can simplify your final answer still yes
Closed by @restive sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find surface area
find the area of all the sides of a shape
then add them together
all of them is 2 m obviously right bc that’s what the porblem says?
then i do
oh wait
i do 2x3
2x2*
and then that’s the area?
then i add the answerr from 2x2 3 times?
@void igloo Has your question been resolved?
@void igloo Has your question been resolved?
@void igloo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @void igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone have a quick mnemonic of sorts to get down the main trig identities?
Also bonus points if theres one to learn the main integration rules
@proper kite Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> Anyone there?
Oh and another question is, realistically how many trig identities should you know for calc 1
i dont think a mnemonic is the right way to go about learning trig identities
Hm
id argue taking time out to understand them will help your recall and application of those identities better than some meaningless memorisation pattern
Right
So mnemonics won’t particularly help that much
they can help you pass the test but in a way that kinda defeats the point of the test
Now realistically, how much should I get hang of till smth like calc 1?
idk how deep calc 1 goes im european
Fair enough, my teacher just told me to chisel to make it less of a strangle
Iirc the American calc 1 is equivalent to gr12 calculus for Canada so yeah
i know even less about the canadian system
any chance you could convert to british?
Iirc tho my teachers did say they don’t particularly apply integrals with identities till first year uni calc
When do you guys first learn calc? Year 10?
year 12 usually
Ah I see
this is a surprise though
What does it look like tho?
I think I can find an ss for a gr12 textbook
differentiation, u sub, trig sub, ibp, parametric differentiation and integration, improper integrals, volumes of revolution, linear diffeqs, simple dynamics problems
oh also hyperbolic sub
Huh I see, interesting
Wait so how much trig identities are you guys expected to know before like year 12?
Or within
Huh I see, since here since Imm gr11, they only taught us the first main 3
which are?
The pythagorean one
The quotient one
And reciprocal one
I think the textbook said smth about 6 or smth
ur gonna have to be more specific im afraid
Like y’know csc=1/sin
For the reciprocals
Sin^2+Cos^2=1
For Pythagorean one
And ah what was it
Sin/Cos for example tan and Cos/Tan for cot
For the Quotient Identitt, apologies
Phone battery dropped
sin/cos you can remember by looking at a triangle
sin^2+cos^2 you can remember by looking at the unit circle
then the reciprocal functions just have names you need to remember
Ah I see, wait aren’t their like 30 smth of em used for functions?
wdym
Isn’t there like 36 different trig identities or so?
As in the main ones
that depends entirely on your notion of "main"
and what exactly you mean by "identity" because some people wouldnt consider tanx=sin/cos to be one for example
Well I mean in like sphere for general mathematics and calc.
Since ik you only need like 3-6 here for like highschool
And by identity I mean moreorless unique ones
i dont think counting how many there are is ever useful
Ah fair enough
also this still depends entirely on what you consider to be unique
is sec^2=1+tan^2 unique given sin^2+cos^2=1?
complletely subjective
Hm I see, fair enough
Wait so how are trig identities exactly applied when doing integration?
Since ik its just moreorless used as a way for simplification
when they can simplify an integral you use them to simplify the integral
eg if i gave u the integral of 1/(1+x^2)
Oh I see, is there any particular steps or rules when applying so?
youd see that
be reminded of the tan^2 +1identity
Ah I see
and then make a trig sub
eh
just do the obvious things mostly
Since ik if you apply them too early it can mess some things up
and stuff like cos^2 is harder to integrate than cos(2x) so use double angle formulae to simplify that etc
Right, I see
Trig identities, very handy
So @red dagger
How similar are arc identities and trig ones then?
Like smth of arctan of the sorts
im not sure that ive ever used any
except obvious stuff like arcsin(sqrt(1-cos^2 x))=x
Ah I see
Oh right, is there any particular trick to make it factoring and dealing with rational expressions easier or does just all come from practice and practice
add 0 to the numerator
eg
x/(1+x)
=1-1/(1+x)
thats all of everything youll ever want to do with rational expressions
Huh
Wait are you able to draw smth to make it a bit more easier to visualize
?
Are you able to like draw a quick visual of it
I mean of the equation or whatever
Idk, I’m not good with words
Interesting, wait are you able to like draw a quick rational expression equation thats harder than the one you gave, Using the 0 numerator method
(Sorry if I’m sounding like I’m asking for a bit much)
$\frac{x}{1+x}=\frac{x+(1-1)}{1+x}=\frac{x+1}{x+1}-\frac{1}{1+x}=1-\frac{1}{1+x}$
bruhh
I see, so what would it look like if you had an equation which required you to factor everything and applying the 0 numerator methodology
example?
Ah I’m not particularly good at examples, but lemme find some practice question
@red dagger So a rational expression like this, how would it to be solve applying the 0 numerator method if applicable
oh thats a division not a partial fraction
Huh, so you have to just factor and use pemdas?
Thats all?
p much
