#help-33
1 messages · Page 74 of 1
The way you solve this is you split this into 4 cases
$x+2+x-2 \leq 6; x+2 \geq 0, x-2 \geq 0 \ -(x+2) +x - 2 \leq 6; x+2 < 0, x-2 \geq 0 \ x+2 - (x-2) \leq 6; x+2 \geq 0, x-2 < 0 \ -(x+2) - (x-2) \leq 6; x+2 < 0, x-2 < 0$
okhh
USS-Enterprise
You solve each of the 12 inequalities, find the intersections on each row then the union of everything at the end
I see I used x, meant to use z
Anyway you get $x \in [-3, 3]$
USS-Enterprise
This is not something you can do
.close
Closed by @violet relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the range of y = log(sin(x))
I've already found the domain; x \in U ] 0+2kΠ, Π+2kΠ [
I dont really get how to start with this problem
@orchid oracle Has your question been resolved?
Well
if it was just log(x)
do you know what the range would be
All of R
okay
but what if I said
you can only put a limited range of x's into log(x)
like says
from x=-1 to x=1 is all that you can put in
what would it then be?
well you atleast should know immediately you can't input negatives
so really this is just 0 to 1 right?
Well log neg is undefined
yes 0 to 1 can be put into this log(x)
0 not included
btw
and then what would be the possible outputs? the range?
yes
or graph it?
,w plot y=log(x)
as x->0 (from the right) log(x) approaches negative infinity
but at x=1, log(x)=0
so do you now know the range?
and if that is including 0
then yes golden
Okay but anyways that was just an example right? a digression from the real question
I asked you, what is the range of log(x) if you can only input x from -1 to 1
and you told me it is (-inf, 0]
correctly
But here's the real question
What is the range of log(x) if you can only input y where y=sin(x) ?
Well this is a bit different right
how do we know what y is?
Well we don't exactly, but we do know that y is at most 1, and at least -1
right? because -1<=sin(x)<=1
coming from the definition of sin?
yh
So was our example really an example? Or did I trick you into solving it
you should be familiar with basic functions like sine, cosine, log(x), e^(x)
and their graphs
Ah
it isn't as complicated as you might think
Closed by @orchid oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no problem
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i determine where the hozirontal asymptote is, if it even has one
brother the answer doesnt help me
do the lim
never touched limits
divide the function by x^2
you will get:
2 divided by (1/x^2) - 1
then when x --> infinity
then 2 / (1/x^2) - 1 --> -2
since 1/(x^2) --> 0
when x --> infinity
Closed by @dusky viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Finding rank of matrix by determinant works for all type of matrix?
Augmented matrix rank and rank of matrix doesn't equal for option A but i want to know about Determinant method
<@&286206848099549185>
@violet relic Has your question been resolved?
@violet relic Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
didn't you understand?
No
why?
yeah that's true
replace all the thetas by 1
and it would work
x+y+z=1
@violet relic Has your question been resolved?
@violet relic Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @violet relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Can you tell how to do this
.close
Closed by @violet relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why are you not allowed to divide matrices? isn't it just the inverse of multiplication?
like if you write it correctly so that it's clear, not using fractions
A ÷ B
for addition, subtraction is just the inverse of addition
isn't it the same idea here?
for starters, is $\frac A B$ supposed to mean $AB^{-1}$ or $B^{-1}A$ ?
Denascite
no one actually writes ÷ anywhere
that's why I said, not using fractions
ok
why tho? it's a math operator
does A ÷ B mean $AB^{-1}$ or $B^{-1}A$ ?
Out Of Nosh
that no one except kids uses
oh right
AB is different from BA
and since addition is commutative for matrices, we can use subtraction
but since multiplication is not commutative for matrices, we cannot use the inverse of multiplication on matrices (division)
interesting insights... how those things (inverse and commutative property) are directly correlated to one another for matrices in very important ways...
but wouldn't it be AB^-1? that's the only way to read it
so the real issue here, is with division we can only divide with respect to the right side
the real issue is that no one uses the symbol ÷
A/B, B\A 
so why introduce it again for matrices
it's still used
i was about to bring that up, snow
o
not for matrices it's not lol
there is absolutely no advantage to introducing it

ok but no like. MATLAB, a language specifically designed for manipulations with matrices of all kinds, has two operation symbols
I mean, it's not a made up symbol.. i guess it's for kindergarten/elementary tho
we use fractions now
and negative exponents
A / B is the same as A * B^-1 while B \ A is B^-1 * A so you can distinguish left vs right division.
yes thats my point. you stop using it and start using fractions
that way it is unambiguous and nobody has any doubt as to what you are writing
it's like partial fractions, I hear there is an issue with them in the math community
what?
mixed fractions?
don't use those either
also just for kids
if you must: $2 + \frac{1}{4}$
Ann
well thats the point of why it is awful notation
for kids it means 2+1/4
wtf
"two and a quarter"
is how you read that
the notation causes confusion the moment you try to do anything remotely complicated with it
i guess the lesson learned
2 1/4 = 2 and 1 quarter
2(1/4) = 1/2
brackets are important?
the lesson is to not use one of them
Useful in speech more than in writing
but really, brackets or × or ⋅ should be used to begin with, if it's gonna be multiplication
2 1/4 doesn't show any of that, so red flag already
.
× shouldnt be used for multiplication either
I don't know if I would necessarily assume these to be multiplication, as much as we "want them to be"...
for the reasons above
but I can also understand why people hate them
maybe because we are so used to bringing the term next to a fraction up to the numerator?
like what if it was a variable instead of a number on the left side
are we always gonna need to use brackets to indicate multiplication?
i guess that is the biggest issue with them.. absolutely horrible for math with variables
.close
Closed by @long cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @long cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
according to my red and white labellings we can say that x=R=r
but i dont think x is equal to R is equal to r
R is the top radius of this paraboloid while r is something radius inside the paraboloid
like first he wrote R in place of x and then r in place of x
Arey sir namaste
oh bade din bhai
chal sawal bata abhi
ya x=R neq r
Yahi sahi hai
toh tum keh rhe ho ki ye iit madras mechanical ke sir ne isme hag diya?
Halaki x = R bhi possible hai, par yaha jo diya hai
Usme unhone r assume kiya hai
x = r rakha unhone y = kx² => y = kr² jisko unhone H height maanli
Han
UNLESS
mere ko toh y=kR^2 dhik rha hai
H is the total height of paraboloid
y=H
Abey sunn
Diagram mai chotta h hai
Likha BADA H HAI
Bada H is height of paraboloid
Chotta h is height of particle instable orbit
Par phri tan(90-x) mai sir ne hagg diya
Hatt bc
x = r hi hoga
Diagram dekhle
bada R rakhne pe to Height of paraboloid milega
Apne ko to height of particlechahiye na
@high niche haramkhor
left side mai H nhi dikh rha diagram ke????
are sun rha hu smghne de bhai
dhik rha hai but smgh me nhi aa rha kuch
ruk zara dhekne de
12 gahnte se mu*h nhi mari toh dikkat ho rhi hai
NNN bhai
kya?
Abey y = kx² mai
R rakhega to H - Total height of praboloid
r rakhega to h - height of particle
Samjha?
Tere liye limit badhake aata hu rukk
?
ho thoda thoda smgha ruk
Abey 6 second mai tab band hone wala tha
Samjh aur bata
?
Tu question pe dhyan de
Han aur wo white mai jo x likha hai , wo r hi hai
Chotta r hi samjh
Han
y=kx parabola ki normal equation hai like general equation
toh isme k ki jgay H R ke terms use krliye kuki uske sath relation lana tha
are ha feeling smgh
haina fir uske baad
Na sunn
jaise tune x ki jagah pe r dala na
to tujhe y milega, usko h mana
ha whi bolne ja rha tha pura sunegga bkl
Han sir bolo, sorry sir
are yrrrr tum bade tharki ho ksm se mere pas hai bhi nhi uske
toh iss equation ka slope nikalne ke baad hamse x=r and y=h leke substitue kardia usi me kuki ab hame usme relation chahhyiye
toh hamlgoo ko sari cheej ka sath me relation mil gya
right baby?
@still temple idhar aao zara
Padhne de
ok babe
ha dalne pe milega
ha
ye sahi hai
ha ok smgh aa rha hao
hai
@summer trench
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @summer trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could somebody walk me through I would simplify this? Is this just FOILing then dividing as much as possible?
You can notice that $\frac{3}{4} \cdot (8x^2 - 20) = 6x^2 - 15$
Jelle
so the left numerator and right denominator will cancel and just leave 4/3
and the right denominator can be factored with difference of squares
That is a really cool trick I didn't see that
If I were doing this the long way would I do it like this?
wait no the 32 is in the wrong place ugh
could i even divide these?
im seeing how google did it, but how the hell do you remember how to do this? like is there not some long method that will always get you the answer?
Not to mention the answer it gives isnt a possible answer for my work sheet what the heck is going on here?
Like how would I solve a huge polynomial being divided by another polynomial like this and be able to get a definitive answer
@narrow gate Has your question been resolved?
@narrow gate Has your question been resolved?
I will help
If it asks just to simplify then this might help.
only need to factor out some numbers and see that difference of squares.
@narrow gate
okay im stupid give me a refrehser on difference of squares
could you write in discord? Im having trouble reading your handwriting
yes!
so using this you are factoring out numbers and you can just keep doing that to simplify it?
instead of doing it the super long way I was doing it
quesiton would this even work or is it jusut so big and unweildy theres no way
i really like having a "this method will always work even if it takes forever" card
only use it when you see difference of two numbers that can be written to the power of two
I see, it is okay to try diffrent methods
long division?
yes like i was doing here
i actually multiplied them here then wanted to see if i could just straight up divide it to simplify
seem it didn't work out.
yeah i gave up it was way to big
the best way to aproach these is to use identities like (a+b) squared (a-b) all squared
that difference of squares is helpfull too
sorry for bad spelling
there are more but it depends on your grade
im not sure if we've actually learned this yet or if theyre just testing me
It is great that you tried at least
so basically you use a mix of things to try and simplify it (and ill probably learn more methods to be able to actually do it)?
yeah thats true
yes
you know the basic rules of these algebraic expressions right?
like x+x is 2x etc
yes yes
theyve taught me that its just a lot to try and do it all at such a big scale
these identities help you spread out these expressions and simplify all of it
like~~ 2x^2/y^2 = ((x+x)(x+x))/(y*y) ~~ this is wrong im stupid
2x^2/y^2 = (x(x+x))/(y*y)
why are you calling them "identities"? what does that mean?
as they are general formulas to help you solve
like some rules
not rules but you get it
like a short way
want me to write the basic ones for you?
sure
i think ive only reeally seen the difference of squares atleast that i can name
What are the names for these?
also ive seen these ! things are they factorials 🤨
or does that have nothing to do with what your showing me
These are called algebraic identities
there are more formulas but for the moment i think it is great to practice more on problems that are using these
nono factorials is that n!
the product of all positive integers less than or equal to a given positive integer
those formulas help you "FACTORISE"
as a really simple exercise
try factoring x squared - 4
a what now
I would just be able to turn x^(-4) into 1/(x*x*x*x)
atleast thats how i think im supposed to do it
i know nothing about factorials i just know that ! at the end of the number means its a factorial and that means something important i think i get into it next math subject
but it is correct!
yeap, pay attention
oh nono
there is a missunderstanding
factorise this expression 4x^2 - 8
x(x+x+x+x)-8 ?
if i knew how to use the bot
that bot uses LaTeX if you want to use it youd have to learn how to write in latex which i think is pretty easy i havent used it in a while though
$\4x^2 - 8$
Wolfgang Composer
$\4x^2 - 8$
```Compilation error:```! Undefined control sequence.
<recently read> \4
l.57 $\4
x^2 - 8$
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.```
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
Wolfgang Composer
$\4x^2 - 8$
```Compilation error:```! Undefined control sequence.
<recently read> \4
l.57 $\4
x^2 - 8$
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.```
bruh
yikers
$(4x^2 - 8)
Wolfgang Composer
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
big bruh
🙀
you see the formula we use here?
is that in here
err i dont see anything in here that looks similar to this maybe im stupid
don t say that
no im just staying im stupid not dumb theres a difference
((2x)^2 - (2\sqrt{2})^2)
Wolfgang Composer
now seeing something?
writing it as a square
okay!
tateorrtot
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
hmmm
lemme just draw it
this
whats the point of doing this espically the sqrt of 2 thing
Wolfgang Composer
Wolfgang Composer
tateorrtot
yee!!!!
YESSS
we initially have 8 right?
yes
Wolfgang Composer
does that make sense?
nope ive never seen that before
is it like 8/4=2 so then they both become two or something im trying to figure out how that happened
well then you are getting a too advanced leasson 🥲
(2\sqrt{2} = \sqrt{2^2 \times 2} = \sqrt{4} \times 2 = \sqrt{8})
no
i ll write again
(2\sqrt{2} = \sqrt{2^2 \times 2} = \sqrt{4 \times 2} = \sqrt{8})
Wolfgang Composer
yes like this
i think i mightve but skimmed over it and forgotten it since i havent done this in forever
well hope i helped you a little
bye!
Closed by @narrow gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys, can I get some help on a standard to vertex form?
I was wondering how my teacher got that answer.
the reason that I am confused is that I got everything right. I thought I had to multiple -38 by -16 before putting it behind the parenthesis
it might take awhile before I get some help so im going to shower
.close
Closed by @rain dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
people of mathamatics
i need helpo
how do i make the fins stop
or the shading i mean
how do i make the shading stop at the rocket sides
it appears your best bet for desmos here is use the polygon() function
cause desmos doesn't like inequalities with two variables
the polygon() functions takes points as inputs
oh
wha tis the polygon function
oh
so u just insert cords
albeit those curves could be kind of annoying, but desmos just really doesn't like inequalities of two varables
idk why
ok ty
so like
theres no way i can do a curve though
i can't just limit that
?
@paper raptor
.close
Closed by @frozen python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
woah wait desmos does 2 variable inequalities now 
ok that makes this easier
@frozen python what's the equation of the outer body of ur rocket?
@frozen python Has your question been resolved?
uhm
y<-\left(x\right)^{2}+50\left{y>20\right}
for the uper half
@paper raptor
i think i got it now though
so its alr
a friend helped me do that part
and i think i can use the polygon equation you rpovided
thank you
.close
Closed by @frozen python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there any way of finding the derivitave of this without applying ln to both sides
using the chain rule, yeah
nicest thing would probably be to rewrite $x^{\cos x} = e^{\cos x\ln x}$
Edward II
(or if you know the rule for exponentials with other bases which I always forget and rederive using that, just use it directly)
Closed by @quaint kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it impossible for something of the same dimension as it’s parent space to have an orthogonal counterpart? E.g. is it impossible for a plane to have an orthogonal counterpart when it is a sub space of R^2? And so on upwards?
@scarlet salmon Has your question been resolved?
@scarlet salmon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there is a forumal for this
Hmm I'm not too aware of the formula
i will personally using heron
but if you have a pretty good at visualizing i think you dont need a formula (if I not mistaken
What's the formula for the triangle area with the cross product thing
@umbral eagle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @umbral eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okay the sum of a1 + a2 . . . + an-1 + an = (2a1 * d(n-1)) * n/2. What if i want to find a1 + a3 + a5 . . . an?
well, sum of a1+a2+a3...an is equal to (n/2)*(2a+(n-1)d)) IF AND ONLY IF they are in AP
common difference is d
so, a3-a2=a2-a1=d
now, a1,a3,a5 would again be in AP.
Now the common difference would be 2d instead of d
yes its an AP
also, number of terms would be (n+1)/2 if n is odd and (n/2) if n is even
so, the sum a1+a3+a5...an=(n/4)(2a+((n/2)-1)2d) for even n
$n=2k,\ \ a_{1}+a_{3}+a_{5}...+a_{n}=\frac{\left(\frac{n}{2}\right)}{2}\left(2a+\left(\frac{n}{2}-1\right)2d\right)$\$n=2k+1,\ a_{1}+a_{3}+a_{5}...+a_{n}=\frac{\left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)}{2}\left(2a+\left(\frac{n+1}{2}-1\right)2d\right)$
B-eard
okay thanks👍
@sterile scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
if i find the area of sector XYW and subtract area of triangle XYZ from it will I be left with part D only?
- I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
anyone?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@summer trench
won't u be able to help me?
IMHO no.
ok
then umm is this equal to 5?
if so then why?
@spark siren sire, u there?
if I do this my answer matches
with the book
but doesn't make sense
on that D thingy
i think you should be more detailed in what is given and what is asked. posting a sketch with nearly no information and asking if something is 5 doesnt make it easy to help
sorry sir,
each side of the square is 10cm as it is the radius of the circle
all the lines i added have length oft the radius (and there are some more). therefore you should be able to determine the angles i marked (an much more). so you should be able to solve your example.
so you should be able to calc the small square, and the 4 parts outside the small square.
@formal raft Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why if PxD=Hf(D) i can obtain P doing this
some context available?
I need to get a invertible matrix P that PxD is equal to the hermite form of D
i know how to do it but i cant understand why
I would use an amplied matrix (D|I) and then transform D into Hf(D) and the thing that is on I place is P
But I dont understand why
<@&286206848099549185>
@glad yoke Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@glad yoke Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the LCM of
I'm trying to find x
For compact two-dimensional surfaces without boundaries, if each loop can be continuously compressed to a point, then the surface is topologically homeomorphic to a 2-sphere (usually just called a sphere). The Poincaré Conjecture, proven by Grigori Perelmán, states that the same is true for three-dimensional spaces.
Someone to solve it
You want x or what is that lcm?
Isn't that the LCM?
in other words multiply by the lcm 
You litearlly just described the LCM to mebruh
Isnt that depends on x
polynomials have lcms too
It's the lowest multiple of all 3 denominators
Anyway just multiply by the lcm then
Closed by @flint reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can't seem to find the mark scheme for this past paper
@amber sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand transformation and enlarging
I think you can just multiple all the perimeter values by -2 (?)
Idk
no, you have to take the coordinates of the vertices, and multiply them by -2
eg, (3,1) becomes (-6,-2)
Ah ok that make more sense
What about the 'around a centre' bit?
you just imagine that point as (0,0)
since its already (0,0) you dont have to worry in this one
basically move the axes over to that point? if that makes sense
I don't understand
so if it said to scale by a factor of 3 around center (2,2)
you would pretend that that point is (0,0), and you would count the coordinates from that point
or, actually you can think about it like this
if you need to scale the point (3,4), you would subtract (2,2) from it to get (1,2), then multiply by 3 to get (3,6), then re-add (2,2) to get (5,8).
that part is hard to explain properly, sorry
Closed by @amber sequoia
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no
He is dead
this equation was postualed in the 1500's
just cube both sides, i think?
I mean if you wanna establish the equality sure
yeah thats it
you can always assume that (2+11i)^1/3 has the form a+bi and then cube both sides and compare stuff. that should probably work
yeah that too
well complex number
some guy said that
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
im watcing a video about it now
ill be back later for some questions
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
This belongs in #old-network message
Oh ty
@small canyon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @small canyon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi can someone explain why part b is 0 and not 1
i thought it was one because if you do f(-x) the first part will be -5x^5 and the rest would be positive i think? so wouldn't there only be one sign change ?
well if u graph the function it has a negative root so might be error
so you think it should be one neg real rool as well?
@spark vale Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @spark vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
i need help
send the question directly
@sweet rune Has your question been resolved?
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
accurate name
@sweet rune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where did i go wrong on this question? not sure what to do
Ya but that happened some times so don’t worry about it too much
You got all the harder factoring correct so
is there any reason why the 3 should be negative? i haven't written it out so im just assuming the multiplication works out so that the 3 should be negative
Well I can’t think of anything besides it works
But I guess you can take out the negative if you want
But ya it just works
Closed by @sinful vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the function of the negative side -5(t-2) because it starts at 2?
.close
Closed by @sharp mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so basically from one vertex to the complete opposite vertex?
first we need to find the total resistance of the cube
resistance is 2 ohm per edge
use a lot of logic and symmetry exploit to find the equivalent resistance across the total system
it can be set up as a bunch of equations
But we fucked it up somehow and dont get the correct result
or simpler
the equivalent resistance of cube containing R resistors on each edge is 5R/6
where R is the resistance
so , as you said R is 2
so $R_{eq} = \frac{5}{3} \Omega$
Its actually not for a physics class
Thats why we are putting it into a list of equations
Bettim
then im sorry im of no use
but
if you can calculate it with omega
then its fine too
@random palm
I just have to calculate with python hehe
yea but this way you can check your final answer
alright
basically I need to get all the values for I_1, 2, 3..
how would I go about that? @random palm
hold on i had a reference
yes
but what I don't understand is how to get the values of u
kirchoff alone wont do it
U = 12.6
we have to loop law and symmetry
but
U-u_1 = R * I_1
U-u_2 = R * I_2
U-u_3 = R * I_3
but I don't know how to find the rest of the equations
yeah, but the problem is that this doesnt show me how to get equations
well yea thats what, idk either how to form equations for loops
simpler systems add up
but those which require kirchoff is hard
@lost stratus Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@lost stratus Has your question been resolved?
@lost stratus Has your question been resolved?
@lost stratus Has your question been resolved?
@lost stratus Has your question been resolved?
@lost stratus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lost stratus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@toxic adder Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
@sonic stag Has your question been resolved?
not yet
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@sonic stag Has your question been resolved?
not yet
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does the system
α + iβ = 3 + 2i
αi - β = -2+3i
gives 0=0 ??
same as normal simultaneous equations
row2 <- row2 - i*row1, that's the operation that was done on the system
understood thanks
.close
Closed by @paper cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I turn into a characteristic equation this:
ik it becomes x^2-x-6=0 but how
make like the substitution r^n = a_n
becomes x^n and so forth
yes then just factor the smallest exponent
идеята е да намериш такива стойности на $x$, че редицата $a_n = x^n$ отговаря на уравнението
Ann
x^n-2 ?
слагаш $a_n = x^n$ в рекурентната релация (не знам как точно се казва на български, но говоря за това $a_n - a_{n-1} - 6a_{n-2} = 0$) и делиш с $x^{n-2}$
да, така се казва
Ann
добре
$x^n - x^{n-1} - 6x^{n-2} = 0$
Ann
$\frac{x^n}{x^{n-2}} = x^2$, $\frac{x^{n-1}}{x^{n-2}} = x^1 = x$
аа деля просто двете страни на x^n-2
точно така
Ann
ъм, аз имам още по една задача за решаване
но да затворя ли това?
можеш да затвориш и да отвориш нов канал или да стоиш тук, както си искаш. препоръчваме обаче да има само по една задача в един канал
Closed by @fossil grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i times this
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a larger number than (Fish Number)^(Fish Number)?
fish number?
ye
what is a fish number
its a googology thing
I have been scrolling in the googology wiki for 30 minutes
oh nvm
@analog meadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple what do you need to solve
Did you used the sinus theorem?
For and triangle that does not have and 90° angle
Yes
Sorry I am not from england
I cant say every Word right
What do you need
Is it unit circle
Okay
Are There any proportions
Or only a And b are 1 cm
But radius of the circle is 1cm
Or no
Bro
I am lost
Side a And side b
Is 1cm
It is unit circle
Sides a And b are practicaly radii
Am I right?
I know sin
A And b are sides of trianhle
It is a circle with radius 1cm
Then sides a And b have 1cm
If you need side c you can't use pythagorean theorem Bc the triangle is not right angled
You can see that the angle B has 45°
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why did Zeller's Congruence formula fail here?
nvmd I found my mistake, since m = 13, then the date would be 13th month of 1981, thus D = 81
