#help-33

1 messages · Page 56 of 1

tender mantle
#

AB, BC, AC then sum check

stoic saddle
#

"sum check"?

tender mantle
#

I meant if the sum of two vectors

#

Equal to third one or not

stoic saddle
#

$\overrightarrow{AB} + \overrightarrow{BC} = \overrightarrow{AC}$ is \textbf{always} true. so checking that won't tell you anything.

elfin berryBOT
stoic saddle
#

you will want to take two of these three vectors (any two) and check whether they are parallel.

tender mantle
#

We will check if they have any scaler quantity in common

#

AB = x Bc

#

Like this

#

Bc= x CA

stoic saddle
#

yes

tender mantle
#

I have a good question for you now

#

B is incorrect by my knowledge

stoic saddle
#

B is indeterminable

#

it may be true or it may be false, but we do not know

#

we cannot say either way

tender mantle
#

False how

stoic saddle
#

well it can so happen that a = 2b

#

then a won't be b and won't be -b

#

so (B) will end up false

#

(for the sake of my example i am assuming here that a and b are both nonzero)

tender mantle
#

If a =2b then it's clearly collinear no?

stoic saddle
#

yes

#

that's my point

#

the premise (a and b are collinear) is true, but statement B (a = ±b) is false

#

you ask how B can be false i give you example where B is false

#

simple things

tender mantle
#

but I don't think your example is correct.

#

example should be false

stoic saddle
#

but B is false.

tender mantle
#

a=2b is not false

stoic saddle
#

and it isn't supposed to be!

#

IF a and b are two collinear vectors,

#

this means we are ONLY considering pairs of vectors that ARE collinear

#

and we DON'T CARE when the vectors AREN'T collinear

tender mantle
#

yes

stoic saddle
#

i've known you enough not to ascribe malice to this but please see the clear logic here

willow owl
#

but B isnt false because a and b are collinear if and only if $ \exists \lambda \in \mathbb{R}$ s.t. $a=\lambda b$

elfin berryBOT
#

calculus is fun

stoic saddle
tender mantle
#

suppose we took lemda = 1

stoic saddle
#

let me repeat my original point

tender mantle
#

then b is correct

stoic saddle
#

WE CANNOT CONCLUDE EITHER WAY whether B is true or false with ONLY the premise that a and b are collinear.

tender mantle
#

we can say it is correct

stoic saddle
#

no, we cannot

#

look

tender mantle
#

a= 1(b)

#

a=(-1)b

stoic saddle
#

can i say something

#

that uses the same logic

tender mantle
#

which is clearly not collineary?

stoic saddle
#

because i think you are failing to see my logic

tender mantle
#

I think yes

stoic saddle
#

ok

#

so let's first agree on some premises:

  • every human on earth is either married (to someone, but that's not important) or not married.
  • children cannot be married, but adults can.
#

do you agree or disagree with these premises? @tender mantle

willow owl
#

we can say that it is wrong

#

because what this statement says is that $\vec{a}$ and $\vec{b}$ are collinear $\implies \vec{a}=\pm{\vec{b}}$ $\forall \vec{a} \vec{b}$ which satisfy this

elfin berryBOT
#

calculus is fun

willow owl
#

and this is wrong because you can find infinitely many counter examples one of them is the one you gave

stoic saddle
#

let's say there is a room with some people in it

tender mantle
stoic saddle
#

if we choose a person in the room and they turn out to be an adult man, then the statement "the chosen adult man is married" is?

(A) definitely true
(B) indeterminable
(C) definitely false

tender mantle
#

What do you mean turn out to be?

#

A few years later?

stoic saddle
#

no

#

let me reword this

tender mantle
#

A

stoic saddle
#

if we choose a person in the room and we find out that they are an adult man, then the statement "the chosen adult man is married" is?

(A) definitely true
(B) indeterminable
(C) definitely false

#

answer again

tender mantle
#

A

stoic saddle
#

wrong

#

you don't know that all adult men in the room are married

tender mantle
#

So you meant in the statement that adults can be married cannot be married?

#

But if we choose and find out it is children then it is definitely not married right?

stoic saddle
#

yes, adults can be married but can also not be.

#

but a child is never married.

tender mantle
#

Yes that's what I said

#

If we find out this is children

stoic saddle
#

don't care

tender mantle
#

Then we can say a definitely statement

stoic saddle
#

not what i asked

tender mantle
#

Okay got it

#

So now back to our question?

#

A and b are collinear

stoic saddle
#

back to our question

#

instead of people we now have pairs of vectors a and b

#

instead of adults we have pairs where a and b are collinear

#

instead of married people we have pairs where a = ±b

tender mantle
#

Hmm so?

stoic saddle
#

statement B here is indeterminable

tender mantle
#

Ahhhh

#

I am sorry i still didn't get it with your example. I meant I couldn't connect it

#

@undone bane can you help me in Hindi?

#

a= +-(b) is clearly visible that it is co linear

#

How can we not determinate it?

#

My answer to the question is C

#

They should be proportional

#

The rest of all are correct to me.

#

What is your answer to the question Ann B and C?

ancient slate
#

I think you can say that only option A is absolutely true statement here. That immediately makes option C incorrect. Option B and D can be true in some cases, but not generally true.

#

I'm assuming lambda in A is nonzero here

stoic saddle
#

Option B and D can be true in some cases, but not generally true.

i tried saying this for the last hour or so, but language hard.

undone bane
tender mantle
#

If a and b are co linear and non zero then a b d co linear 1000000%

tender mantle
ancient slate
#

I'm not saying they're not collinear. I'm saying that collinearity doesn't imply anything about their magnitude

#

Option B implies they have the same magnitude, which is not necessarily true

tender mantle
#

Co linearity just means parallel

ancient slate
#

Yes

tender mantle
#

No direction and magnitude affect it

#

They can be same or not same in direction and magnitude

ancient slate
#

Key words "can be"

#

Option B is saying that they necessarily have the same magnitude

tender mantle
ancient slate
#

I'm not sure if this is language barrier or not (I hope it is) but all I can say is that options B and D are making unnecessary assumptions about the magnitude of the vectors

tender mantle
#

But they are satisfying the statement so we can't be discarded

ancient slate
#

They satisfy the statement in some cases

#

Not always

#

A is ALWAYS true, provided lambda is nonzero

#

C is ALWAYS false since A is true

tender mantle
#

Is it not always true?

ancient slate
#

In that particular case it is always true

#

but the question never said that vectors a and b are those particular ones, didn't it

tender mantle
#

What is your example like this to be fails

ancient slate
#

This is a problem with the generality of the statement

#

I'm not saying it's not true in certain cases

#

I'm saying it's not ALWAYS true

tender mantle
#

I just want to know one single example to feel it can be wrong too

ancient slate
#

In fact, you can choose b = 2a

tender mantle
#

Can you make it one example no??

ancient slate
#

b=2a is collinear with a

#

but $\vec{a}$ \neq \pm\vec{b}$

#

wait how do you do parallel again

tender mantle
#

How can you multiply it with random numbers?

#

🤔

elfin berryBOT
#

TooManyCooks
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

tender mantle
#

Ohh now i got it

#

Bingo

ancient slate
#

The plus minus guarantees they have the same magnitude

tender mantle
#

Yoooo

#

I got it yeeeeeeeee

ancient slate
#

GOOOOOD

#

nice one bruh

tender mantle
#

You meant that if a and b are co linear so we will have many vectors in a=lembda forms

#

But some of them will be a=b

ancient slate
#

yes

#

some

tender mantle
#

Others will not be equal

#

Fuck this little statement

ancient slate
#

Hahaha it do be like that

tender mantle
#

Now i can understand what was she saying

#

It is true only for a=b

#

Not for all a,b pairs

#

Okay now option D

ancient slate
#

Option D is saying they MUST have the same direction

#

sorry typo

tender mantle
#

Looool this is harassing the statement

#

Where did they say must?

ancient slate
#

by saying that a and b have the same direction

#

they don't have to have the same direction to be collinear

tender mantle
#

They are just picking some random vectors which is satisfying

ancient slate
#

exactly

#

you can't be picking specific vectors and make general statements

tender mantle
#

Set X : A,B are collinear
Set y: same direction and different megnitude

#

Y is subset of X so how can we it is false

ancient slate
#

they're talking about subsets of X

tender mantle
#

Subset will be always true

ancient slate
#

true, but what about the rest of X

#

the problem is asking about X, not its subset

tender mantle
#

We are only talking about Y only ...there always be a case for each subset to make it false in some terms

#

Is this why you guys were saying either or either not?

ancient slate
#

The only premise they gave is that a and b are collinear

#

D is immediately saying they have the same direction, which need not be the case

tender mantle
#

Then we are just comparing X and Y subsets

#

If this is the case then the full definition case option A will be correct

#

B,C,D all are incorrect

#

C is totally incorrect

#

B,D will be incorrect in some cases

#

Say YES for my statement @stoic saddle @ancient slate

stoic saddle
#

i don't want to continue this sorry

ancient slate
#

C is always incorrect, B and D are sometimes correct, sometimes incorrect

tender mantle
tender mantle
#

Thank you all of you

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tender mantle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tender mantle
marsh citrusBOT
ancient slate
#

What do you think is the answer?

tender mantle
#

|lembda| |a|=1

stark trail
#

lambda*

stark trail
#

see if you can rearrange it to be so

tender mantle
#

got it

#

4

stark trail
#

(D)

#

yes

tender mantle
#

YOOOOO

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tender mantle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hazy lion
#

does $\frac{-y}{2} \lim _{\varepsilon \to 0} \qty( \varepsilon ^{\alpha + 1} ) = 1$ imply necessarily $\alpha = -1$

elfin berryBOT
#

jan Niku

hazy lion
#

I know this is probably a dumb question

plain stump
#

y is fixed?

hazy lion
#

yea

plain stump
#

also long time no see jan Niku catKing

hazy lion
#

sup

#

i do not remember your name sadcat

plain stump
#

Was Neko

hazy lion
#

OH

#

sup neko

plain stump
#

before the dark ages happened

hazy lion
#

lol

#

its been a long time neko

plain stump
#

you're doing your masters now?

hazy lion
#

i am

#

you?

plain stump
#

nice!!

#

undergrad still

hazy lion
#

brutal

#

pure math?

#

i dont remember at all

plain stump
#

Not so pure anymore

#

I took some stats class and some ml classes

hazy lion
#

how much longer do you have?

plain stump
#

1 year

hazy lion
#

you gonna do grad?

plain stump
#

yea

hazy lion
#

where at

#

if u can say

#

we should pomo again

#

im getting back into it

plain stump
#

im @ nyu rn for undergrad

#

theres no way in hell im doing a ms here

#

cause my scholarship wouldn't carry over

#

also yea KEK

#

i do need to pomo cause i stay at home to study a lot now

hazy lion
#

is there some study server were both in

plain stump
#

possiblly for a bit? pomodoro server or something

#

was mostly on here before they removed the voice channels

hazy lion
#

im about to be running the heck around

#

friday is a busy day for me

tender mantle
#

what is happening here?

hazy lion
#

sup arjunn

ancient slate
warped wind
#

inf arjunn

hazy lion
#

were talking abuot limits

#

sup toomany cooks

#

can you solve my problem lol

tender mantle
#

I can try it

hazy lion
#

@plain stump we can find a spot

ancient slate
#

what's the point of -y/2

hazy lion
#

how about just the study server

warped wind
plain stump
#

yea sure

hazy lion
#

youre on it?

warped wind
#

I think hmmCat

hazy lion
#

i usually go to 6

plain stump
#

not anymore

hazy lion
#

ah

plain stump
#

you could link me later

hazy lion
#

okay

hazy lion
#

its a variable

#

but for sure theres no other way for this to happen right

#

alpha has to be -1

tender mantle
#

I don't think it has to be -1

hazy lion
#

yea im confused

#

but i guess the goal is only to find a candidate

#

@ancient slate it comes from a perturbation problem

#

the thought was to assume that $\epsilon ^{2 \alpha + 1} y^2 \sim -2 \epsilon ^\alpha y$

elfin berryBOT
#

jan Niku

hazy lion
#

the limit results from this

#

im not really certain if the process is supposed to determine alpha, or just candidate alpha

#

or if multiple values of alpha can even come from this

#

this specific limit i mean

#

but if you assume its fixed then it must come out as -1?

stoic saddle
#

tfw wrong epsilon catscream

ancient slate
#

varepsilon or riot

hazy lion
#

either way

ancient slate
#

Is there more context about that expression that you can provide?

warped wind
# hazy lion

Well, the limit only exists for $\alpha \in \mathbb{N}_{0} \cup {-1}$, right? And it's 1 iff $\alpha = -1$ and 0 otherwise? Or am I missing something \thonk

hazy lion
#

it comes from trying to find roots of $\epsilon x^2 -2x+1=0$

elfin berryBOT
#

Mikkel

#

jan Niku

hazy lion
#

singular perturbation

#

so we took $x = \epsilon ^{\alpha} y$ for finite $y$

elfin berryBOT
#

jan Niku

hazy lion
#

re sub to the problem

#

then use dominant balance

#

does that help @ancient slate

ancient slate
hazy lion
#

im not sure how the rest of the solutions are getting tossed

ancient slate
#

mm... yes... dominant balance.. mhmm

hazy lion
#

clearly epsilon = 0 is trash

hazy lion
#

i guess you just assume that one of the terms is asymptotically not important

ancient slate
#

I have no idea what it is either 💀

hazy lion
#

along epsilon

#

I guess this implies that the other two terms are asymptotically equivalent

#

so if you have A + B + C = 0 and C vanishes

#

then A ~ B

#

i guess ONLY C vanishes is maybe more correct

warped wind
hazy lion
#

y is a variable

#

oh, i see what you mean

#

yea this whole process doesnt make any sense to me

ancient slate
#

Ah I get it now

#

You said the epsilon is a tiny perturbation right?

hazy lion
#

yes

ancient slate
#

Tell me if I get this right

#

$\varepsilon^{2\alpha +1} y^2 - 2 \varepsilon^\alpha y + 1 = 0$

elfin berryBOT
#

TooManyCooks

ancient slate
#

Then you said take limit as epsilon goes to 0

#

which means the leading perturbative term is $-2\varepsilon^\alpha y$

elfin berryBOT
#

TooManyCooks

ancient slate
#

did I get that right?

hazy lion
#

the thought is that you assume that one of the terms is insignificant

#

so then the other two will be significant

#

then they should be asymptotically equivalent

#

one wont dominate the other

hazy lion
ancient slate
#

I just wrote what you gave me

#

So to clarify

#

You want the first term to vanish?

hazy lion
#

its more like we assume that a term will vanish, and then check them one by one, to see if the assumption makes sense

#

i just happen to know that the term 1 will vanish asymptotically

plain stump
#

for dominant balance

hazy lion
#

well, if you check the other two, you'll see they fail

#

so if one works, it will be 1 vanishing

hazy lion
#

i think?

#

the substitution with alpha results in $y^2 - 2y + \epsilon = 0$

elfin berryBOT
#

jan Niku

hazy lion
#

assuming that limit makes sense and provides alpha = -1

#

which is the part i dont get

plain stump
hazy lion
#

why sad?

plain stump
#

i did not nearly pay enough attention in my numerics class

ancient slate
hazy lion
#

@ancient slate the balance is gonna imply asymptotic equivalence right

#

or am i crazy in jumping to this

#

my prof just sorta skirted over everything

#

it makes sense that in A+B+C=0 if only C vanishes then A~B must be true right

#

otherwise either A or B would vanish, too

ancient slate
#

I got promoted happy

hazy lion
#

heyy welcome to helpful

#

ohhh

#

@warped wind i get what you meant now

#

about -1

#

but then this also has implications for the value of y

#

so thats a problem

#

maybe

warped wind
#

Yes

hazy lion
#

yea im not sure how to resolve that

warped wind
#

Unless something monkey funky happens for the whole expression for the cases where the limit is going to infinity

hazy lion
#

my prof just matched powers

warped wind
#

But I would assume not

hazy lion
#

but this seems dumb to me

#

ill ask him about the ~

#

i must be making some mistake in moving from the assumption into ~

#

i dont see how anything else pops out

#

thanks for the help, crew happy

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hazy lion

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

hazy lion
#

.reopen

marsh citrusBOT
#

hazy lion
#

sorry u were typin

#

👀

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hazy lion

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gray shale
#

how can i show that:

marsh citrusBOT
odd dove
#

Oh shit sorry didn't notice you had already posted here

gray shale
#

$1-cos(x \pi) =2sin^2(\frac{\pi x}{2})$

elfin berryBOT
willow owl
#

Use the fact that $\cos(2x)=\cos²(x)-\sin²(x)=1-2\sin²(x)$

elfin berryBOT
#

calculus is fun

marsh citrusBOT
#

@gray shale Has your question been resolved?

gray shale
#

ye but it's 2x not pi*x

unborn condor
#

$\cos(2K)=cos^2(K)-sin^2(K)=1-2sin^2(K)$

#

let's see if renaming the variables here help you

elfin berryBOT
#

LordFelix

gray shale
#

K = x*pi/2 then

#

ok thx

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @gray shale

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jolly sigil
marsh citrusBOT
jolly sigil
#

So I set up the integral but I feel like the smaller radius might be wrong

#

how about this, someone correct my reasonining. I don't care what the integral is rn.

#

I chose 27x^3 as the larger raidus because it was the furthers way from x= 2

#

and x = 1 to be the smaller radius because it was closer to x=2

sacred kestrel
#

look at it geometrically, is the inner radius changing at all?

jolly sigil
#

ummm

#

hmm

#

Is the inner radius changing

#

no?

#

hmm wait

#

you've stumped me. Cause I wanted to say that I don't think the radius would change but then how do I explain the larger radius

#

that will change depending on x

sacred kestrel
#

its been a minute since ive done this let me look at my old notes

jolly sigil
#

okay

sacred kestrel
#

okay so this should be shell method, with respect to x ( same axis of rotation ) if memory serves.

jolly sigil
sacred kestrel
#

you are using washer method, which would be a y integration i believe

jolly sigil
#

I was told you can use them both

#

I thought dx because the width was determined by the x axis

sacred kestrel
#

in this case, x axis radius, not width.

#

width of the washer would be dy

#

draw it out

#

its a horizontal washer

jolly sigil
#

horizontal washer meaning like it's laying flat

sacred kestrel
#

right

jolly sigil
#

instead of say, on it's side

sacred kestrel
jolly sigil
#

so dy is the width

#

okay

sacred kestrel
#

right, but i would 100% use shell method here

#

if you've already covered that, that is.

jolly sigil
#

Sure

sacred kestrel
#

shell method allows you to use the same axis of rotation if rearranging the function in terms of the other var gives you something ugly.

jolly sigil
#

so that's 2pi times height times radius

jolly sigil
#

idk why

#

when we talk about axis of rotation I start to gloss over

sacred kestrel
#

good rule of thumb is disc/washer method uses the other axis that didn't rotate.

#

don't stress, there's only two ways to rotate, by x or by y.

#

in this case, its rotated "around" an x value, so we use the other axis for disc/washer, since we integrate by width.

jolly sigil
#

the other axis being the y axis?

sacred kestrel
#

yes

#

if we rotated around a y value, then x would be used, since our width would be in the x axis.

#

dx/dy is shorthand way of saying how we slice things

#

you wouldn't slice the volume with dx here, because you'd be cutting straight through the volume, instead of getting only a uniform slice.

#

with shell method it allows us to use the same axis and makes it way easier to deal with something like this when the washer method will give us an ugly cube root.

jolly sigil
#

what do you mean use the same axis

sacred kestrel
#

axis of rotation

jolly sigil
#

like you can use either or

#

or that you're using both

sacred kestrel
#

with washer/disc you are forced to use the axis that didn't rotate.

#

shell i think can be either/or

jolly sigil
#

ughh

sacred kestrel
#

listen, shell is easy here

#

so you know the formula?

jolly sigil
#

yes

#

It's just I'm not getting some of this stuff. I have the main idea, computing the volume using integration. Boom, got that down.

#

But some of these smaller details I'm lost

sacred kestrel
#

i struggled a bit too on this stuff.

#

just takes practice

jolly sigil
#

yeah

sacred kestrel
#

the key is drawing it out

#

it helps a ton

#

and remembering that when we slice, we must get the shape we need. otherwise its the wrong axis.

#

so if you draw out the cylinder we will integrate

#

i marked the inner and outer radii

jolly sigil
#

I see that

sacred kestrel
#

so when x = 1, we need the radius of 1 from x = 2

#

but

#

if we take x at 0.5

#

radius will need to be 1.5

jolly sigil
#

what's the relationship of those points?

sacred kestrel
#

if we just rotated at x = 0

#

we could just use 2pi x * height

#

but since we are rotating at a specific x, we need to modify that x

#

2pi ( circumference ) * height

#

what formula would give us the proper radius at every x from x = 2

#

sorry my book says circumference for the formula, but technically we are replacing that with the distance from the point of rotation

jolly sigil
#

it's fine I recognize that from my own reading

#

I don't know

#

but now I think the height would be y = 27x^3

sacred kestrel
#

hold up we aren't at height yet

#

but yeah that would be the height

#

lets say i give you x = 0.5

#

whats the formula for finding the distance from x = 2, to that 0.5

#

its very simple, dont overthink it

#

just look at the graph and tell me the distance from 2 to 0.5

jolly sigil
#

would you just take the difference between 2 and 0.5 ?

sacred kestrel
#

right

#

0.5 was the x we chose

#

BUT

#

that relation will hold for ALL x on the axis

jolly sigil
#

ohhhhhhh

sacred kestrel
#

so we get (2 - x) for our radius of the shell

jolly sigil
#

so 2 - x would work for every x

sacred kestrel
#

right

jolly sigil
#

ahhhh

sacred kestrel
#

so thats our circumference for the formula

jolly sigil
#

I see

sacred kestrel
#

so then put it all together and integrate

jolly sigil
#

I think I've seen that before

#

I just didn't follow it very well

sacred kestrel
#

that will be a key concept moving forward

jolly sigil
#

good

#

that's not very difficult

#

I see why it works now

sacred kestrel
#

you'll need to be able to visualize distances along the axis for later stuff like hydrostatic pressure

jolly sigil
#

oh man

#

is that calc 2?

#

or calc 3

sacred kestrel
#

yes

#

calc 2

jolly sigil
#

okie

#

I'm in calc 2

#

can't wait

sacred kestrel
#

calc 2 is fun because it has so much variety, but also terrible because of it haha

jolly sigil
#

variety with what? Applications?

sacred kestrel
#

just so many new things

#

differential equations, integration with respect to force/work done, series,

#

logistic growth, etc.

jolly sigil
#

I'm sure I'll like it. I get in a real bad mood when I don't get something so I just sit in a hole for a bit unfortunatly and it becomes harder to learn. But now I feel like I'm getting this better.

sacred kestrel
#

series is where shit gets real

jolly sigil
#

I got a workbook on differential equations I haven't used yet.

#

stoked

jolly sigil
sacred kestrel
#

you find out there are approximations for everything lol

jolly sigil
#

oh man

#

idk what you even mean by that

sacred kestrel
#

you'll know when you get there lol

jolly sigil
#

does it have any applications to stats

#

I usually try finding examples to get me exicted if it has a translation to stats

sacred kestrel
#

stats relies on approximation... so yes 😛

jolly sigil
#

or probability

#

I meant series specifically

sacred kestrel
#

oh yeah. the meat of calculus is in series imo

#

you've touched the surface

jolly sigil
#

hellll yeah

#

well thank you for walking me through that

sacred kestrel
#

series allow curve fitting and all that

jolly sigil
#

ah

#

okie okie

#

I'd love to go over a disk/washer method but I don't want to take up your time

sacred kestrel
#

good luck! glad i could help even though my memory was a bit fuzzy

jolly sigil
sacred kestrel
#

key is drawing it out. the more you draw it out, the easier it gets, eventually you wont need to draw.

jolly sigil
#

Sometimes your professors forget what it was like to learn the material so they gloss over some stuff

#

gotcha

#

will do

#

have a good one

sacred kestrel
#

you too 🙂

jolly sigil
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jolly sigil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

modest python
#

I want to know what's the best way to decide how to check if a system of linear equations is inconsistent?

modest python
#

for example here, I need to find a value of p so that the system is inconsistent

marsh citrusBOT
#

@modest python Has your question been resolved?

modest python
#

<@&286206848099549185>

marsh citrusBOT
#

@modest python Has your question been resolved?

bright jay
modest python
#

yes, but I don't know if I should check every existing number for p to know if it give an inconsistency

#

or if there's a way to know what numbers to check

bright jay
#

What does an inconsistent system mean?

modest python
#

when the rank of the augmented matrix is greater than the rank of thematrix

bright jay
#

In other words, there's no solution correct?

#

Like one line is parallel to another

modest python
#

yeah

#

but I still don't get it

bright jay
#

Do you know how to reduce that into REF?

#

Because having it in that form would help out

modest python
#

like, with Gauss-Jordan?

bright jay
#

Yeah

#

It's two more steps you can do

modest python
#

okay yeah, I have it

#

Excuse my handwriting

bright jay
#

Solve the last row, you'll see that you'll end up with two values of p

modest python
#

with the augmented matrix?

bright jay
#

Yeah, you can just focus on the last row

modest python
#

okay, thanks

#

I got 7 and 11, I just need to test those out?

bright jay
#

Yes

bright jay
modest python
#

okay, thank you so much!

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @modest python

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

bright jay
modest python
bright jay
#

And you got?

modest python
#

11

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

feral summit
marsh citrusBOT
feral summit
#

how would i do this one

#

ive never done it in like fraction percents

marsh citrusBOT
#

@feral summit Has your question been resolved?

quick moth
#

7 1/4 percent is just 7.25 percent

#

7 5/8 percent is 7.625 percent

#

@feral summit

#

Here’s your equations

feral summit
#

Oh

quick moth
#

It’s either 32 or 31 dollars depending on where you round

quick moth
#

its like 108 or 109 dollars

#

i would just assume they want you to round after each person

#

so i would put 109

#

@feral summit

feral summit
quick moth
#

what did u put on the last question

#

did u put 31 or 32

#

@feral summit

#

i guess its 108 then

feral summit
quick moth
#

one sec

#

ok they dont want u to round until the end

#

so its gotta be 108

feral summit
quick moth
#

haha

#

do understand it now tho

#

if its fraction just put 7/8 in your calc

#

you get .875

#

so its 6.875 percent which just turns into a rate of .06875

feral summit
#

ohh

marsh citrusBOT
#

@feral summit Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @feral summit

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

exotic magnet
#

Could someone please check my work I have a feeling I messed up somewhere

brave spire
#

Can u provide the question

exotic magnet
#

Calculate the shortest distance from point C to any point along point along AB

#

And the points are A(3,5) B(-1,7) C(-7,-3) and D(5,-7)

willow bison
#

essentially what you want to do is the following:

#
  1. find the equation line connecting A and B
#
  1. find the line that is perpendicular to line segment AB such that it passes through C
#
  1. find where these lines intersect
#
  1. find the distance between the point of intersection and point C -- this will be the answer
exotic magnet
#

Our teacher doesn’t let us use Desmos she wants us to do it by hand

#

That’s why is so complicated

#

This is what I get in desmos

#

I think I messed up one of the equations

#

@willow bison

willow bison
#

sorry i'm a bit busy

#

you don't need desmos

#

you can easily graph this by hand

#

do you know how to find a linear equation using two points?

exotic magnet
#

Ya

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @exotic magnet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thorny jungle
#

@wet holly Sorry to pin, i do have a follow up qeuestion

thorny jungle
#

I am not sure how to argue from -sup(A) = inf(-A) to sup(-A) = -inf(A)

marsh citrusBOT
#

@thorny jungle Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @thorny jungle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

torpid owl
marsh citrusBOT
torpid owl
#

!status

marsh citrusBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
torpid owl
#

1

#

<@&286206848099549185>

velvet vine
#

Line EF is the perpendicular bisector of segment BD and the bisector of angle BAC

still temple
#

Only the last option is correct..
BD is a curve hence EF does not form a 90 degrees with it

velvet vine
#

It says segment BD, which means that it is the line segment between points B and D

marsh citrusBOT
#

@torpid owl Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

torpid owl
#

.reopen

marsh citrusBOT
#

torpid owl
#

@velvet vine @still temple so what's the answer?

#

there's probably only two correct options.

#

(if that helps)

velvet vine
#

Line EF is the perpendicular bisector of segment BD and line EF is the bisector of angle BAC

marsh citrusBOT
#

@torpid owl Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

worthy spindle
#

Can anyone numerically confirm my answer is correct?

worthy spindle
#

i've attached work

marsh citrusBOT
#

@worthy spindle Has your question been resolved?

worthy spindle
#

<@&286206848099549185>

marsh citrusBOT
#

@worthy spindle Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@worthy spindle Has your question been resolved?

worthy spindle
#

<@&286206848099549185> please 🙏

marsh citrusBOT
#

@worthy spindle Has your question been resolved?

strong jewel
marsh citrusBOT
#

@worthy spindle Has your question been resolved?

open relic
#

,w integral from 0 to 120 of (230-2/120 h) dh

open relic
#

Yes it's correct 👍🏽

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fallow jolt
#

f(x+h) = 5/(6-x+h) - f(x)= 5/(6-x)
Common denominators:
f(x+h)= 30-5x/(6-x)(6-x+h) -f(x) = 30-5x+5h/(6-x)(6-x+h)
Subtract:
5h/(6-x)(6-x+h)
Divide by H from the denominator of the function:
Get's the answer : 5/(6-x)(6-x+h)

marsh peak
#

f(x + h) is not equal to that

#

$f(x + h) = \frac5{6 - (x + h)} = \frac5{6 - x - h}$

elfin berryBOT
#

A Lonely Bean

fallow jolt
#

ohhhhhh

#

okay

#

let me try that

#

After doing that, I get -5 / (6-x-h)(6-x) and it's wrong
f(x+h) = 5/6-x-h - f(x) = 5/6-x
Common Denominators:
30-5x/(6-x-h)(6-x) - f(x)= 30-5x-5h/ (6-x-h)(6-x)
Subtract:
-5h/(6-x-h)(6-x)
Cancel out the h from denominator in the function
-5/(6-x-h)(6-x)

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fallow jolt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gilded pivot
marsh citrusBOT
gilded pivot
#

I must calculate those for n>=1

#

What do I need to do exactly to calculate them ?

brave spire
#

Separate the sum for 1st one

gilded pivot
wind beacon
#

you can use the formulas after seperating

worthy spindle
gilded pivot
#

Or somewhere I can have them

brave spire
# gilded pivot Then ?

For first one use sum of finite GP, sum of AP I think, then for n-3 it will just n-3 n times so it becomes n^2 - 3n

gilded pivot
#

Im not familiar with English writings

brave spire
#

GP = Geometric Progression
AP = Arithmetic Progression

gilded pivot
#

Ah yeah ok

#

Thx

#

Im not sure I really understood

#

Is that about it ? @brave spire

#

@wind beacon

brave spire
gilded pivot
#

N-3 should stick together ?

brave spire
#

Yes

gilded pivot
#

How do I know that

brave spire
#

Also the sum of the GP 2^k is not 2^m

brave spire
#

It's fine that way

gilded pivot
#

2^n is only the gp

#

Not the sum

#

It’s that ?

brave spire
#

By sum of GP formula

#

S_n = a(r^n - 1)/(r-1) = 1(2^n - 1)/(2-1) = 2^n - 1

gilded pivot
#

Good?

#

I saw that

brave spire
gilded pivot
#

I don’t need n+1 in thzt ?

#

It’s good like that ?

#

Are they good ? @brave spire

marsh citrusBOT
#

@gilded pivot Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@gilded pivot Has your question been resolved?

wet holly
#

hm

marsh citrusBOT
#

@gilded pivot Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stark field
marsh citrusBOT
stark field
#

Helper Rieman ask me this but i was making food

#

i am surprised to how he is surprised that this cant be

#

Does anyone think this is OK?

main idol
stark field
#

Its derivation

main idol
#

I asked for justification

stark field
#

So the question is to find y(w,p) , but we do that from problem of profit maximisation with y (production) as variable

main idol
#

I also asked for a starting equation

stark field
#

y(w,p) is function of production of a firm in the short run which means r*K is ignored

#

so first order condition FOC: derivation of profit function by variable (y) in this case must be 0

#

and from there i start with derivation

main idol
#

Yea you didn't give any of that information earlier

stark field
#

Sorry i thought like just the math part of it i don't know if i got it correct I think it is?

#

also Pi is profit function

#

y - Function of supply of producer, w - price of Labour (L) , p - Price of product, Pi - Profit function

#

😢

#

i fail to prevail

marsh citrusBOT
#

@stark field Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tardy idol
#

i cant understand how to expand this

marsh citrusBOT
tardy idol
#

i dont know how they did that

still vortex
#

First they did polynomial division, then they factored the denominator

tardy idol
#

oh well my bad i shouldve mentioned i factored the denominator fine

#

its just the top i couldnt figure out what they did

#

one sec i forget what polynomial division is

#

ok yeah how do you use polynomial division here?

still vortex
#

Example:

tardy idol
#

i see.. but

#

what would you be dividing?

#

like the denominator by (x^3 + 3)?

still vortex
tardy idol
#

yes

#

sorry

still vortex
#

x^2+3x+2, because that's the denominator

tardy idol
#

ok

#

could you give me like 2min so i can try to do it to see if i understand

still vortex
#

Ok

tardy idol
#

ok could you possibly show me how to start the polynomial division

still vortex
#

I'll try to typeset it because I'm not on a phone and I can't take pictures

tardy idol
#

ok 👍

still vortex
#

This looks weird but it's the best I can do

hollow sparrow
#

yep exactly! The remainder you can do as (7x + 9)/(x^2 + 3x + 2) and then they factored the denominator to (x + 2)(x + 1)

#

nice work 🙂

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tardy idol Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @tardy idol

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

tardy idol
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sacred kestrel
#

Need help on highlighted parts a, d

marsh citrusBOT
sacred kestrel
#

the book doesn't directly explain these points

#

this is all i could find on a

scarlet hinge
#

I would say both are true.

sacred kestrel
#

so a linear transformation is the same as a linear function then?

#

linear would be special for functions i suppose

scarlet hinge
#

A linear transformation / linear function is just a function that is linear.

scarlet hinge
#

Transformation might highlight that it is multidimensional or geoemtrically significant

sacred kestrel
#

the word "special" threw me off honestly

scarlet hinge
#

I think they just mean that not every function is a linear function

#

so they are just a special kind of function

proper zodiac
#

d is a bit vague imo

scarlet hinge
#

same with a imo lol

proper zodiac
#

if all your spaces are finite then you can represent a linear transformation between them as a matrix transformation

sacred kestrel
#

for part D this is all that is said

proper zodiac
#

whether you interpet that as saying they are matrix transformations is ehh

scarlet hinge
proper zodiac
#

you wouldnt really call it a matrix at that point

scarlet hinge
#

Depends on your definitions.

#

I have definitely seen people call them matrices.

#

Either way it seems pendatic.

sacred kestrel
#

oh i found it

scarlet hinge
#

💀

#

Well thery could mean different hthings by this.

sacred kestrel
#

so every matrix transformation is a linear one, but its not always true in reverse?

#

thats confusing as hell

proper zodiac
#

id be interested in those examples

scarlet hinge
#

Either they do exclude infinite matrices or perhaps they want specifically a representation.

#

You can definitiely write a mapping that does not look like a matrix representation at all.

#

Today I alrady helped one that wanted the matrix representation of the polynomial mapping phi(P) = P(X + a).

sacred kestrel
#

alright, settle down boys this is chapter 1 of my LA book lol

scarlet hinge
#

One can argue that without a basis that it is not yet a matrix transformation.

sacred kestrel
#

im trying to find those examples for you though

proper zodiac
#

yeah it'll likely just be an abstract linear map on two vec spaces

sacred kestrel
#

so idk if the terminology went over my head but i went through the examples in chapt 4 and 5 and none specifically said it was an example of a linear transformation that wasnt a matrix transformation.

proper zodiac
#

whats the book?

scarlet hinge
#

lol

sacred kestrel
#

David Lay - Linear Algebra and its Applications

scarlet hinge
#

The thing I can tell you for sure though is, that if you do fix a basis, then you always REWRITE any linear mapping as a matrix mutliplication.

sacred kestrel
#
ISBN 10: 0-321-38517-9```
scarlet hinge
#

If you have infinite dimensional vector spaces in your mapping then the matrix will of course also be infinite.

sacred kestrel
#

at this point we haven't covered basis, determinants, subspaces, or any of that yet

scarlet hinge
#

ah...

sacred kestrel
#

this is still chapter 1

scarlet hinge
#

short outlook then.

proper zodiac
scarlet hinge
#

In the more general sense, people call anything a vector space that has linearity properties.

sacred kestrel
#

are there spaces where linearity is impossible?

scarlet hinge
#

In some cases you might not be able to have a natural vector representation.

#

A basis is just you choose some predfined vectors and use them as your stating point to put together any other vector with them.

sacred kestrel
#

so would
[ 1 0 ]
[ 0 1 ]
be the basis for the cartesian coordinates?

scarlet hinge
#

Like you can put together any vector in 2d real space with the standard basis (1, 0) and (0, 1).

scarlet hinge
#

You could also use (0, 1) and (128738, 123873137812387) though bhappy

scarlet hinge
# proper zodiac

this is an example of an extremely high dimensional vector space

sacred kestrel
#

so, the book doesn't really justify the statement that every matrix transformation is a linear transformation, but states it anyway. what would i put as a justification?

scarlet hinge
#

Yeah I would probably just point at the page.

sacred kestrel
#

yeah because it really doesn't back up that statement at all lol

#

final answers

scarlet hinge
#

wait

scarlet hinge
#

Am I dumb or does it literally claim the opposite?

sacred kestrel
#

LOL

#

yeah

scarlet hinge
#

I am reading there will be counter examples in chapters 4 and 5

sacred kestrel
#

so every matrix transformation is a linear transformation, but not every linear transformation is a matrix transformation

#

but again, it doesn't really explain why that is besides a "trust us, or read chapter 4 and 5"

scarlet hinge
#

yeah

#

It's probably either the basis thing or the dimension thing.

#

It's really just terminology.

#

I can guatantee you that later on if you do more advanced mathematics people are not going to obsess over this distinction.

sacred kestrel
#

honestly the terminology is already confusing in chapter 1, theres like 5 different ways to say things already

scarlet hinge
sacred kestrel
#

thanks for the help though guys, time to move onto the next problem.

scarlet hinge
sacred kestrel
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sacred kestrel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

narrow mural
#

I need help please

marsh citrusBOT
narrow mural
#

I don’t know how to do this cause my teacher didn’t specify, if anyone is familiar with the topic please help me :,))

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Excuse the handwriting

#

😭

marsh citrusBOT
# narrow mural <@&286206848099549185>

Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.

elfin berryBOT
marsh citrusBOT
#

@narrow mural Has your question been resolved?

trim quest
#

@narrow mural Would you be comfortable describing the volume of those two boxes?

#

the space that needs to be filled with styrofoam is (volume of big box) - (volume of small box)

narrow mural
#

1728 - x^3

#

??

#

@trim quest

trim quest
#

yep

#

that describes the extra space in the big box that has to be filled in

narrow mural
#

I need the whole solution

#

😭

trim quest
#

well that is the whole thing for the first question

narrow mural
#

How do I factor polynomials??

#

Or what method do I use etc

trim quest
#

hm, this is a difference of cubes

#

I mean literally, it's two boxes that are cubes

#

and also mathematically, those are both perfect cubes

#

I bet you have a formula for sum/difference of cubes

narrow mural
#

I need to answer what the a= and b= how do I solve this or what should I put

trim quest
#

well

#

your a^3 is 1728

#

so what is a?

#

like, what did you cube to get 1728 in the first place?

narrow mural
#

12^3

trim quest
#

yeah, a is 12

#

and how about b? since your b^3 is x^3

narrow mural
#

x

trim quest
#

yep, a = 12, b = x

narrow mural
#

THANK YPU SO MUCH

#

WAIT

trim quest
#

waiting

narrow mural
#

Wait that’s all

#

Thanks so much

#

Like a lot

#

This is 100% my grade

trim quest
#

no problem 👍 glad it helped

marsh citrusBOT
#

@narrow mural Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

zinc smelt
#

I don’t know how to continue the problem

marsh citrusBOT
marsh peak
#

From -12 < x - 6 < -10 you can imply that |x - 6| < 12

#

So you have |x - 6||x + 5| < 12|x + 5|

#

And with correct delta you can make 12|x + 5| < epsilon

zinc smelt
marsh peak
#

epsilon/12 perhaps?

zinc smelt
#

oh yea im dumb

#

ok, i think i got it from there

#

Thanks!

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @zinc smelt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

humble river
#

hello

marsh citrusBOT
humble river
#

I am having some trouble here

#

Like i know cube root for these numbers

#

is 3 and 5

wooden citrus
#

What is the question

humble river
#

Factor formula

undone bane
#

is this a test?

wooden citrus
#

Ok so you know that 3^3=27 and 5^3=125

humble river
#

No is my home work

#

Yes i do

#

A test wouldnt have the options of ask your teach and need help etc i guess

wooden citrus
#

then what is (3^3)*s^3

humble river
#

i get

#

27s^3 again

elfin berryBOT
#

Dyssrupt

humble river
#

Ah this formula

undone bane
#

exponent rules are not required here

wooden citrus
#

But to get 3s^3

undone bane
#

the op forgot the identity

#

which is required for the problem

humble river
#

Oh

marsh citrusBOT
#

@humble river Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.