#help-33
1 messages · Page 43 of 1
,tex dom A = { x \colon \exists y \ni (x , y) \in A }
infi
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
what does the reverse epsilon mean here ?
why not use : ?
Makes sense with the definition of Dom, it's the set of x values that map to a y
Must be just to avoid confusion with the previous :
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
That would be the simplest way to write it I guess
.close
Closed by @brave marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick linear algebra question
didnt we show you how to do it ?
???
yes
I did T - 3I_3
let's called that Z
then did ZX= zero vector
and solved for X
got no solution
so something is wrong here...
its not wrong you didnt do it well
$\begin{pmatrix} 6 & 6 & 6 \ -4 & -4 & -4 \ -4 & -4 & -4 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ x_2 \ x_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \end{pmatrix}$
Herels
yes
Herels
$x_3 = -x_1 - x_2$
Herels
$\begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ x_2 \ x_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ x_2 \ -x_1 - x_2 \end{pmatrix}$
Herels
$$=x_1 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ -1 \end{pmatrix} + x_2 \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ -1 \end{pmatrix}$$
Herels
I had 1 more question if u don't mind
here are your eigenvectors
can you show me the characteristic polynomial ?
sure
it is diagonalizable
What makes u say that?
for each eigenvalue, the algebraic multiplicity is equal to the dimension of their eigenspace
Thats why I recommand you to read your course before doing exercises
If you dont learn your lessons you are kinda dead in linear algebra
it seems easy tho once I read the notes
its very straightforwaded
np
.close
Closed by @tulip folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Compute the Dirichlet density of the set of primes p such that p - 1, p + 2 and p + 3 are squares modulo p
I don't even know where to start here
Help me i am ponos
@copper drum Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Rewrite these conditions using legendre symbols
Recall the distribution of quadratic residues too
So, correct me if I'm wrong. but I've always got confused about the significance of Legendre symbols; I know how to work with them, manipulate them, and the Quadratic reciprocity theorem; but I don't actually really get what it says, i.e. I know how to compute its value; but I don't really know what a legendre symbol tells us exactly
or really what a quadratic residue is
If I would have to guess, I think it says that, using it here; it tells us that ((p-1)/p) = 1, ((p+2)/p) = 1, and ((p+3)/p) = 1
Although, I guess it could be the case that the last two could be 0
Say if p = 2, then this would satisfy the conditions as 1, 4 and 5 are all squares mod 2 (as 5 = 3 = 1 (mod 2))
So ((p+2)/p) I guess could equal 0
Oh, so I guess here the whole point is we're trying to compute these values or whatever
((p-1)/p) = (-1/p)
((p+2)/p) = (2/p)
((p+3)/p) = (3/p)
I guess, we wanna know first for what values of p is (p-1)/p an integer
So, suppose it equals an integer, k, then (p-1)/p = k, this would imply p - 1 = kp iff p - kp = 1 = p(1-k) iff p = 1/(1-k), we need p at least 2; so k must be negative, the only value of which would give an integer p would be k = -2, which gives p = 1 which is NOT prime,all others give non-rational 1/(1-k), so therefore p doesn't divide p-1 here, so we have (-1/p) = 1 which means that p must be congruent to 1 modulo 4
<@&286206848099549185>
I guess an easier way of noting this is just the fact that (p-1)/p = 1 - 1/p, which is an integer if an only if p = 1 or p = -1, which are neither prime
Similarly, p for which (p+2)/p is an integer, (p+2)/p = 1 + 2/p which is an integer if p = -2,-1,1 or 2; but 2 is prime so this works
So it could be 0
But wait actually, if p = 1 (mod 4) then p = 1 (mod 8) (I think)?? So ((p+2)/p) must be 1, but I guess since we know that p = 1 (mod 8) anyway this doesn't really tell us anything new
We now want p for which (p+3)/p is an integer
(p+3)/p = 1 + 3/p which is an integer if an only if p = -3,-1,1,3; so since p = 3 is prime we need to check this I guess
p + 3 is obviously a quadratic residue mod p
As we have 3 = 6 = 9 (mod 3)
Wait, the whole condition for ((p+3)/p) to be 1 is for p = 1 (mod 4), which we already know
this isn't right
Oh damn that's not true wait
You shouldn't think of the legendre symbol as a fraction
the fraction is purely notational
Basically you're looking for primes such that the following is true:
No, because (a/p) = 0 if p divides a
so you need to show p doesn't divide a
But this is obvious
For it to be 1, it can't be -1 since we have it's a quadratic residue
Assume WLOG p>3 then you're alright
I don't think it matters though
$$\legendre{a}{p}$$
Jeeves
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
I've used the fact that p can't divide p -1 to show definitively that p is congruent to 1 (mod 4)
Note that $$\left(\frac{a+kp}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{a}{p}\right)$$ for k an integer
Jeeves
what do you mean here
p can't divide p-1 by definition
or do you mean $$\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = 1 \iff p \equiv 1 (\textrm{mod} 4)$$
Jeeves
which is true
The idea is that you can transform these Legendre conditions into congruence conditions
and then use the Chinese remainder theorem to get a single congruence condition
from then you're done
Yeah that's what I've used, ((p-1)/p) = (-1/p) which is 1 when p = 1 (mod 4), and this is true since we know that ((p-1)/p) = 1 since p doesn't divide p -1 and we know p - 1 is a quadratic residue or whatever
You're just solving the simultaneous equations $$\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{3}{p}\right)=1$$
Jeeves
Yes
which will give you a condition mod 4, 8, and 12
then combine using the CRT more or less
We don't really gain any more information from the = (2/p) though I think, because this equals 1 when p = 1 (mod 8), which is obviously true because p = 1 (mod 4)
exactly but you need to check this
Right?
and when p = 7 (mod 8) but ofc this can be discounted
we do gain information my bad
we deduce that $$p \equiv 1 (\textrm{mod } 8)$$ of course
Jeeves
But this is the same as saying p is congruent to 1 (mod 4)?
OH WAIT
It's not
it's stricter
5 = 1 (mod 4) but 5 doesn't equal 1 mod 8
So we eliminate some primes
Do the same for the last case to deduce that but I think there's a much faster way
Quick question, when we know that (2/p) = 1 iff p = +- 1 (mod 8), I'm confused what that's saying, is that an p = 1 (mod 8) or p = -1 (mod 8) because surely it can't equal both right?
yes
Okay, so we know that p = 1 (mod 8) so far
Wow, this is actually really fun maths lol
I'm tired of proofs this is actually like problem solvy lol
Um, so we have (3/p) = 1
This is a little computational
If you want to do a programming project on stuff like this you can try this:
this is true when $$p \equiv \pm 1 (\textrm{mod } 12)$$ by Gauss' lemma
Jeeves
idrk (3/p) = 1 tells us, obviously since p = 1 (mod 4), we also have (p/3) = 1 mod 4
Clearly discard -1, +1 gives us that $$p \equiv 1 (\textrm{mod } 24)$$
Jeeves
So you're done
Can you explain this, my version of Gauss' lemma is Suppose $p \nmid a.$ Let $\mu$ be the number of least residues of the elements in ${a,2a,3a,...,\frac{p-1}{2}a}$ that are negative, then $(\frac{a}{p}) = (-1)^{\mu}$
LeftySam
yeah
How does this tell us that p = 1 (mod 12)?
Try it yourself, it really isn't that hard
and it tells us that $p \equiv \pm 1 (\textrm{mod } 12)$
Jeeves
Oh, I think I have the result in my notes "As an example, we can take a = 3. The above shows that 3 is a quadratic residue modulo p if and only if either
p = +1 (mod 3) and p = 1 (mod 4) or
p = -1 (mod 3) and p = -1 (mod 4). That
is equivalent to either p = 1 (mod 12) or p = - 1 (mod 12) by the
Chinese remainder theorem"
That's the result right?
Yeah it's just an example so worth remembering
So we have p = 1 (mod 12) too, and p = 1 (mod 8)
Surely we can't use CRT here because (12,8) = 4?
yes
and the dirichlet density of this is just gonna be 1/phi(24) which is 1/8?
Why did you say it was 0 earlier I'm confused
yeah I messed up earlier
I'm actually not familiar with dirichlet density
but I could guess what it was
So 1/8th is right do you think?
Yeah as far as I'm understand it's just a method by which you determine how big the set of a subset of the prime numbers is
yeah I'm sure
looks like it relies on a lot of stuff you probably haven't learnt though so I'm wondering why you're working with it
How so?
We've done like L-functions, dirichlet densities, dirichlet characters etc
It looks like it relies on Dirichlet's theorem for primes in arithmetic progressions
oh have you?
nevermind then
Yeah, this is what I used to get 1/phi(24)
Yeah I get that
You know way more about algebraic number theory than elementary number theory then lol
This could be because I'm failing to recall some results we did last year because last year I stopped going to lectures and did really bad lol
Hurt me pretty bad, got 22% on a stats module lol
a 3 hour exam the morning after a 3 hour afternoon exam lol I walked out after an hour, I averaged 40% for the year and had to retake modules. Not the best, also suffered in my jan 3rd year exams because although I did better (50%) I struggled because I had to focus on my group project
Only need 75% average to get a 2:1 now but I'm doing really with these modules so hopefully doable
Oh I thought you were in the US with all those percentages haha
I mean that seems fair - I did similarly bad in my first year
Yeah it looks like the specialisation is working out
The 40% was my second year lol, I actually did great first year, I remembered getting 93% on a module lol
But exams were online so it's different
and last year I had a bit of a mental breakdown (weirdly, unrelated to uni) so I basically was left with a week to learn a year's worth of content, most modules I would have like an afternoon to learn from scratch lmao; so the fact I passed any I'm taking as a W lol
what uni do you go to, if u don't mind me asking; saw you link a Cambridge thing so Cambridge?
yeah
Yeah I mean no wonder you don't get 90% it's literally Cambridge lol
Would be nice though
You getting a 2:1 from Cambridge is gonna be more impressive than a first from where I'm at tbh
Except if ur at like idk UCL, LSE etc.
I'm at Southampton so it's russell group but like decent
I think it does to an extent
Like certain non-Russell groups are good
It's an arbitrary cutoff point - if you're looking at course quality/performance standards there are many better points to draw a line
but none of it matters anyway
Yeah, I mean I picked the wrong degree I think; I might end up doing another ug in econ because that's what I wanna end up doing, so 2:1 would be huge because it'll mean I can convert from maths ug to econ masters
Anyway
Thanks for the help.
.close
Closed by @copper drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm confused on how to start
@fierce pewter Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fierce pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given an equilateral triangle with side length 40, find the area of the triangle to the nearest tenth
Would I just do 1/2(40)(40)
@hollow cliff Has your question been resolved?
what would i do from there
have you learnt pythagoras theorem
if its an equilateral triangle i suppose all sides are 40
i havent
oh
any suggestions?
what about the formula to calculate equilateral triangle areas
have you learnt anything like that
tell me the formulka
and ill lyk if i know it
no
what about trigonometry? sin cos tan?
i do know thaty
do you know how all angles in equilateral triangles are 60 degrees
yes
i actually do not know
what is sin60
I mean in the triangle I showed you
Tangerine
you can then find h
34.64
would i do 40 times that divided by 2
Tangerine
yes, but its better to express h in a more accurate way to reduce error
h should be $(40)(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}) = 20\sqrt{3}$
i see
Tangerine
then use that to calculate the area
20 radical 3) (40)
it should be 692.8, corrected to the nearest tenth
.close
Closed by @hollow cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
@still temple go the the previous channel you said hello, ask your question there and here do .close
My previous channel for some reason doesn’t show
click this shi bro
it'll show
.close
Closed by @brittle notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure what I'm doing wrong here
I wrote down in my notes for the process to get this answer as follows:
we separate the variables and integrate both sides as follows:
∫(1/e^(2u)) du = ∫e^(4t) dt
To integrate the left-hand side, we use the substitution v = 2u, dv = 2 du, which gives:
(1/2) ∫(1/e^v) dv = -(1/2) e^(-2u)
Integrating the right-hand side, we get:
∫e^(4t) dt = (1/4) e^(4t)
Substituting these results back into the original equation and simplifying, we get:
-(1/2) e^(-2u) = (1/4) e^(4t) + C
To find the value of C, we can use the initial condition u(0) = 9. Substituting t = 0 and u = 9 into the above equation, we get:
-(1/2) e^(-18) = (1/4) + C
Solving for C, we get:
C = -(1/2) e^(-18) - (1/4)
Substituting this value of C back into the above equation, we get:
-(1/2) e^(-2u) = (1/4) e^(4t) - (1/2) e^(-18) - (1/4)
Simplifying and solving for u, we get:u(t) = -(1/2) ln[2(e^(4t) - e^(-18) - 1)]
yet somehow, it's wrong..
$- \frac 12 e^{-2u} = \frac {e^{4t}}{4} - \frac {1}{2e^{18}} - \frac 14$
Stephen
@wooden grotto wanna go thru it step by step after the line above?
Wait a second, Lemme try it out myself ig
Ok I’m not seeing how u got ur answer
Could u show the steps after this @wooden grotto
@wooden grotto Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so im doing this problem im getting 1/sqrt3x for my answer
but the answer key says this is the answer
y = (1/sqrt(3))x, you mean?
yea
oh so i did it right
yes
where does he even get a three from though
yes and ive been trying to tell you that your answer is correct
so where did the teacher get the three from ?
nvm
they equal one another so its the same thing just an extra step thank you
he rationalized the denominator
anyways thanks
.close
Closed by @sudden swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain this please
@woven harness Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @woven harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I seem to be off by exactly 1. I can’t really spot where I went wrong though. Maybe while reindexing the sum, or using the evenness?
@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?
@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?
@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?
@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?
@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?
@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?
i can't read your image tho
Mh is my writing really that bad?
It's a discrete time signal
$x[n] = a^{|n|} cos(2 \pi f_0 n T)$
Learath2
$a = - 0.8$ and $f_0 T = 1/12$ find the energy of the signal $E{x[n]} = \sum_{n = - \infty}^{+ \infty} |x[n]|^2$
Learath2
The error is with this step since the sum starts from n=1, the usual result for a geometric series starts from n=0:
$$\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n = \frac{1}{1-x}$$
so you should have:
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \qty(\frac{16}{25})^n = \frac{1}{1-\frac{16}{25}}-1$$
where the -1 will cancel the first term, hopefully solving your discrepancy
Tymelord14
God, that is trivial. I was just so focused on how I broke up the second sum, I didn't even think of that. Thank you so much
No problem, these kinds of errors are the worst to parse after a long calculation 🙂
.close
Closed by @tribal jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does this equal 4 instead of -1
yes, but you have to do it from left side to right side
so 4-2.5 is 1.5. Then 1.5+2.5 is 4 so it's 4
pemdas is a troll acronym
it's not the convention, no one actually does that and it leads to this problem if you do
so should I trust left to right or pemdas
Pemdas says that addition and subtraction are on same level
if you wanted you could do pedmsa
at least it's the right answer, although it's not what people do either
if you do pemdas its -1
- parenthesis
- exponents
- multiplication and division
- addition and subtraction
im curious to know how you got -1
in pemdas, addition comes first. So they first added 2.5+2.5 and then did 1-5
this is how it works btw
but isnt it -2.5+2.5
Even if you use pemdas incorrectly like that the negative sign stays with the first 2.5 so -2.5+2.5
addition and subtraction are on the same tier
but then wouldnt it be 0 times 4
so you read and perform them left to right
no?
where do you see a multiplication sign
he's saying that you can rewrite the expression as 4 + (-2.5) + 2.5
becaause if you are saying the negative sign stays with the 2.5 that means you have to multiply the 4 and 0
multiply??
???
lmao
no, there's no multiplication sign in here and no multiplication going on and there never was any. what are you talking about?
0 is neither positive nor negative so either 4-0 or 4+0 will work. There’s no multiplication here
btw are you 13 or older NubMan?
but -2.5 + 2.5 still produces 0, right?
sure does.
thats what i was saying
there is no way to get -1
or multiply
nubman you need to grind harder
whoever is getting -1 is misinterpreting pedmas
this is the order of operations, some operations are on the same tier
@hazy swan are you still here?
ye
k
so you're revisiting basic arithmetic now
okay, now tell us: do you have any questions left to ask?
Not really
.close
Closed by @hazy swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me solve this one please idk if im supposed to like divide or something
you don't have to, but it's a good first move.
after u move cos to the right side
left**
the take it as a comon factor
then solve as it equals to 0
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
second, "move" is bad
my teacher wants me to do it this way
why is that
"move this to the other side" is sometimes ambiguous, and even if it isn't, leaves room for error.
right
and i didn't say you did.
ok thx!
@celest finch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand why the Answer on the left is incorrect but the answer on the right IS correct?
Negative?
Ohh so above the x axis is positive?
y values above the x-axis are positive yes
Hmm
So I can plug in any numbers into the equation? Like 3 or -4?
And whatever it gives me means the graph will be negative or positive?
Yep, or 0
Closed by @burnt heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What am I doing wrong, the denomenator should be -x^3/3 +O(x^4)
Doesn't look like you multiplied and instead added
How can I help?
idk where my mistake is
I too get that XD
just where did this happen
werll
plz help
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
?
.
if you can walk me throug the entire process would be better too
oh sorry im not very experienced in calculus yet
just wait for a while someone should come along
don’t spam tag
sorry...
Xd
well it is...
cosx - (1-x)e^-x = (1- x^2/2 + O(x^4)) - (1-x)(1 -x + (-x)^2/2 + (-x)^3/6 + O(x^4)
=1 - x^2/2 + O(x^4) - 1 + x - x^2/2 + x^3/6 + O(x^4) + x - x^2 + x^3/2 - x^4/6 + O(x^5)
=2x - 2x^2 + 2x^3/3 - x^4/6 + O(x^5)
$\cos x - (1-x)e^{-x} = \left(1 - \frac{x^2}{2} + O(x^4)\right) - \left(1-x\right)\left(1 - x + \frac{(-x)^2}{2} + \frac{(-x)^3}{6} + O(x^4)\right)$
Shift
$1 - \frac{x^2}{2} + O(x^4) - 1 + x - \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^4) + x - x^2 + \frac{x^3}{2} - \frac{x^4}{6} + O(x^5)$
Shift
$2x - 2x^2 + \frac{2x^3}{3} - \frac{x^4}{6} + O(x^5)$
Shift
so where is my problem ??? <@&286206848099549185>
@slow dock Has your question been resolved?
$x^{3}$
HAMADY SAKANOKO
$-\infty$
HAMADY SAKANOKO
$-infty$
HAMADY SAKANOKO
stop spamming here, use #latex-testing
.close
Closed by @slow dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @slow dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Curious about this, but is surjectivity arbitrary?
a function $f: A \longrightarrow B$ is said to be onto (surjective) if Range($f$) = $B$
Aka for every $b \in B$ there exists an $a\in A$ such that $\map f a = b$
but the codomain is not unique
you can define the codomain to be anything as long as you have Range($f$) $\subseteq B$
Well this also makes me think
are two functions with different codomains, but the same range, equal?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
everything you've said makes sense @still temple
I would say no
a function requires a domain, codomain and rule
oh hm thats really interesting
so like
even if it is like
imagine those two functions okay
<enumitem>
\
oops
\begin{align*} &f: \R \longrightarrow \R &&f: \R \longrightarrow \R\setminus \set{\R_{< 0}} \
&x \mapsto x^2 &&x\mapsto x^2
\end{align*}
so anyways like
for those two functions
the domain and range are inevitably the same
but i guess the two functions themselves are not the same like you said right
:xd:
yes
yes, on a technicality
Im not sure when it actually matters though
mm yeah
also why not R_≥0
:p
because that would exclude 0 would it not haha
thats like

$\mathbb{R}_{\geq0}$
something u can get from the first function
since 0 is in the image of f
so 
That's just R+
wait

oh
so they would be the same
so surjectivity is really just
"it depends" lmao
some bozo's thing

okay
so i will just ask a follow up question
because
i dont get cartesian products

The set of throws of 2 dice is just the cartesian product of 2 sets of dice throws
[
f: ; \Z\by\Z \longrightarrow \Z \
(n,m) \mapsto n^2 - m^2
]
so this was an exercise for us
to figure out if it is bijective
How is that actually defined ?
oh yeah i remember that
How is n^2 = m^2 an element of Z
oh woops i messed up
Ok
so
like one issue i have with this
first question: how is the m supposed to still exist with the mapping?
Honestly pretty simple
since we are going from z^2 to z
There exist bijections from N to N^2, why not Z^2 -> Z ?
yeah i am just trying to rationalise it i guess haha
Actually since N ~ N^2 and N ~ Z, N ~ Z^2 ~ Z
They're both countable so...
It exists, but is it this function ?
You don't have a clue ?
dont think i am following along particularly no
Could it be injective ?
there's a bijection from the integers to the positive integers
and then you can just plug that in to the square function
because N+ <=> N+^2 is bijective
maybe I'm not understanding :(
We weren't really asking about that
ah
It's known don't worry
okay before we proceed
let me just ask one thing
why is it not
[\Z^2 \longrightarrow \Z^2]
n^2 - m^2 is clearly an integer
f(2,4) = -12 for example
then you have to show that
[
\map f {a,b} = \map f {c,d} \implies (a,b) = (c,d)
]
somehow?
i am guessing?
If you think it's injective yes
[
(a+b)(a-b) = (c+d)(c-d)
]
But now, how does one proceed
There are several ways
I don't particularly think it is, i am just trying to find it out using this
if i can achieve some contradiction
then well like, it is not injective
Then consider both possibilities
For example, how could these two things be equal
In practice
Maybe an edge case where they're conveniently both equal to something special
a+b = c+d and a-b = c-d being one possibility i suppose?
are you trying to find that this implies (a,b) = (c,d)
the simplest case i can think of is for if both sides are equal to 0
Yes
oh hmmm
How do you make a product 0
if either one of the terms is 0
Hence
So if a = -b or c = -d i suppose?
an example that shows it is not injective hmm
i mean to find such an example it means i have to prove that this implication is indeed wrong right
oh wait
A counterexample is enough
we have just done it?
Just show such a case actually exists
And is not just an abstract construct lol
okay i mean like, with this in mind, you do get the first equality that f(a,b) = f(c,d), but to make this injectivity hold we have to show that (a,b) = (c,d), and by considering a = -b and c = d case, then you get (-b,b) = (c,d) but -b is never equal to c under the integers
thats my logic i hope i didnt frick it up 
Well it could
does f(4,4) = f(3,3) not disprove injectivity immediately
But it seems you have not understood the importance//meaning of the word example
Yes it does
Every (n, n) and (n, -n) get sent to 0
ah so i guess i should've done what zfnQRZJT did
Because it directly disproves injectivity
yeah i was trying to think of a general approach to it
but this is way simpler i guess
Rather than showing you can have some abstract counter-example, just show it
(anyways, in general, I dont think contradiction works well in noninjective proofs. much easier to find a concrete counterexample)
thats a good thing to know, idk why but i always feel like counterexamples or specific cases are not complete enough
They are
this thinking is completely wrong i know
"look, here's the truth, right in front of you, you can't deny it, it's right there"
call it an inconsistency in zfc
Now if want a bit of a more challenging one, you can try and find whether f is surjective
Yeah exactly
alright so being onto is defined as this
but for this case
it would mean
Though do note I'd consider that to be quite a step up in difficulty
finding whether all integers are the difference of 2 squares?
For any c
Basically yes
But pls
ok I will shh
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Which I may be taking a bit too at heart rn but anyways
There's nothing you can't read
oh wdym?
Autocorrect making typos
wait what i said was directed at what zfnQRZJT wrote for how to do it haha
but regardless back on topic
He just rephrased it as something not in terms of f
oh hmm
okay so just i dont get to confused in my thoughts,
We are trying to confirm that for every $c \in \Z$ there exists $a,b \in \Z^2$ such that $\map f{a,b} = c$
Meaning we have to prove that
[
a^2 - b^2 = c
]
holds for all integers
That's what he said yes
yeah
i just rationalised it
okay
to prove this...
lets see
oh okay so we have to try to hunt a counterexample for c
well
i cannot seem to understand how i should prove that
Agreed
i cant come up with a good counterexample
Try to do some theory first
Get an understanding of the problem
Then see if it works or if you have an idea of how to build a counter-example
'do some theory' is pretty vague haha
maybe i should come back to this later on? after i get a better understanding?
wait a question
Or n = m+k if that's simpler
isn't that the same
what are those 3 variables supposed to be? haha
oh hmm
simpler to understand
it is more or less just the difference of squares
meaning
(a-b)(a+b)
assume k = a-b
then
k(k+2b)?
this turns into k^2 + 2kb
wlog k >= 0
Then f(n,m) = k^2 + 2mk = k(k+2m)
which is just a quadratic by then, and quadratics are defined over the reals (which encompasses the integers), but they are only defined over the reals for a non-imaginary discriminant
Hint: ||it's about integers||
||Look at some arithmetic property||
||Like parity||
I cut it into 3 parts purposefully btw
okay i clicked the first hint
its about integers hmm
so we have to see if k^2 + 2mk = c holds for all integers c
Don't you think the product is a more useful form ?
my mind was thinking of quadratic properties so i sticked to the first haha
but lets think about this
k(k+2m) = c
Although if you want to plug that into the quadratic formula and manage to get something out of it, I respect that. But I doubt it
now hmm
what do i do with this guy hm
okay i will click the second hint
arithmetic property

Hopefully you see what I mean by that
i can only see distributivity being applicable there
hmm how does that end up helping me now 
oh!
wait
odd + even = odd
and odd(odd) = odd
so whatever we get is going to be odd
so we can rewrite c as
waitwait
2m+1 for some integer m?
holdon
Arithmetic property such as prime decomposition or parity yes
not if k is even
Do we ?
welp
Yes
Yes
oh my god this problem is actually amazing lmao
Do we reach every even number ?
We can do that case first
alright
how so
Gets them to think
fair
(fun fact: any bijective function f from Z^2 to Z can prove that Q is countable)
Indeed
Any false statement as well
good point
Also don't mind us, we're just having our own little fun
so assuming $k =2u \textss{for} u \in \Z$ and knowing that $k+2m = 2w+1 \quad w \ in \Z$ as well
then [
2u(2w+1) = c
]
but can we assume that $w = u$ 
I'm trying to figure htis out actually lol
Yes
that makes sense
wait yes to which statement mateo haha
zfn
What nonsense is this
😭 sorry
k just became 1 out of nowhere
how come 2u + 2m = 2w + 1
We said it's even -> even and odd -> odd
Hence looking at 2 separate surjectivity problems
For the parity of k ofc
m is just a bystander
yes i did that wrongly, sorry, so with $k(k+2m) = c$, we can assume that $k = 2u$ and $k+2m = 2v$ assuming k is even
that would be correct in this case i suppose?
it's weird to me that texit takes all the words into consideration
It's beautiful
true
wait
Hence...
hence we are 50% done
problem is that uv is never odd, so this never can be odd
Because k is even
uv can be odd just not 4uv
.
We know it's even. We want to see if it reaches every even number
yeah! because even (4) by a potential odd is even
i mean
this is where the counterexample comes in i suppose?
You didn't finish the theory yet
well you didn't do the k odd case but you could
You were one sentence short
one sentence short..
The one coming after that
hence the even case of k does not hold for all integers c, but only solely for the evens?
thats the only thing i can say after that
What does that tell you about the possible values of c ?
oh i dont think u can get to 2
Why
because well c can be 0, but then there is a jump to -4 and below and 4 and above
right? 
like
assume u = 1 v = 1
you get c = 4
u = -1 v = 1
you get c = -4
In short, we only reach multiples of 4 !
but there is no way you can get to c=2?
oh my god i am so dumb haha yes
I'm actually impressed that Toby is still here
so now to fully figure out if it is surjective, we need to see if the odd case can eat up the rest of the integer possibilities other than multiples of 4
if it doesnt then this isnt surjective
right?
im impressed any of you are still here. Honestly much appreciated because this is a big learning experience
We already showed it isn't surjective
It doesn't reach even numbers that aren't multiples of 4
Now ofc you can take this exercise a bit further
You can ask if every odd integer is reached, and if every multiple of 4 is reached
hmm isnt the second pretty clear? i mean it is simply 4uv after all
I'd say they're both fairly easy yes
u can just hold one of them to be 1
and then
the other to be any integer
and boom
But also technically I thought injectivity would be easy lol
sorry my foundations are horrible since i haven't really built on this all that much
We've all been there at some point
yeah i am trying to build on this hopefully, since i will start doing counting problems which tbh are just sets extra haha
but anyways
this concludes this incredibly stretched out help channel haha
big, big thanks to you three lads @glacial hedge @still temple @fair fulcrum
have a great day!
.close
Closed by @wild cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i will try doing it now
i am actually gonna write all of this cohesively on a separate document
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
helps me solidify the idea much better haha
I love how you can write all this working out while counterexample c = 2 existed
Yeah but you gotta prove it
Prove 2 can't be reached without doing a bunch of theory
(n+m)(n-m) = 2
n+m = 1 and n - m = 2: impossible
n+m = -1 and n - m = -2: also impossible
n+m = 2 and n - m = 1: impossible again
Last case: impossible too
Feels much less fun to me
true I just mean there's a mundane and small solution
.close
Closed by @fair fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @signal umbra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can't see where i did wrong here
I've tried to make both x = 1 and y = 1
and got different answers
so it is definitely wrong
Closed by @oak void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
.reopen
so for number 3, after finding a basis, is there a reason that they made z=-t? it would be the same as z=t right?
but why, since its just a free variable it doesnt matter what it equals to as long as everything else is right
so if z=t then my answer would be [-1,-1,1] instead of [1,1,-1]
no that would be the same vector space

