#help-33

1 messages · Page 43 of 1

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

fallow pewter
#

,tex dom A = { x \colon \exists y \ni (x , y) \in A }

elfin berryBOT
#

infi
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

fallow pewter
#

what does the reverse epsilon mean here ?

brave marsh
#

No nvm sorry I was wrong

#

Think it's just "such that"in that case

fallow pewter
#

why not use : ?

brave marsh
#

Makes sense with the definition of Dom, it's the set of x values that map to a y

#

Must be just to avoid confusion with the previous :

fallow pewter
#

oh i see

#

is there another way to re-write the same ?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

brave marsh
#

That would be the simplest way to write it I guess

brave marsh
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @brave marsh

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tulip folio
#

quick linear algebra question

marsh citrusBOT
distant peak
#

didnt we show you how to do it ?

tulip folio
#

The method doesn't work

#

That was shown

distant peak
#

???

tulip folio
#

yes

distant peak
#

its like the only method to find eigenvectors

#

:/

tulip folio
#

I did T - 3I_3

#

let's called that Z

#

then did ZX= zero vector

#

and solved for X

#

got no solution

#

so something is wrong here...

distant peak
#

its not wrong you didnt do it well

tulip folio
#

I double checked with wolfram alpha

#

my calculations were not wrong

distant peak
#

$\begin{pmatrix} 6 & 6 & 6 \ -4 & -4 & -4 \ -4 & -4 & -4 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ x_2 \ x_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \end{pmatrix}$

elfin berryBOT
#

Herels

tulip folio
#

yes

distant peak
#

we have two rows that are linear dependents, welp

#

$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 0$

elfin berryBOT
#

Herels

distant peak
#

$x_3 = -x_1 - x_2$

elfin berryBOT
#

Herels

distant peak
#

$\begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ x_2 \ x_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ x_2 \ -x_1 - x_2 \end{pmatrix}$

elfin berryBOT
#

Herels

distant peak
#

$$=x_1 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ -1 \end{pmatrix} + x_2 \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ -1 \end{pmatrix}$$

tulip folio
#

yeah I see where I messed up

#

yep

#

ty

elfin berryBOT
#

Herels

tulip folio
#

I had 1 more question if u don't mind

distant peak
#

here are your eigenvectors

tulip folio
#

it's super quick

#

sorry

#

is it not diagonizable

#

Do u agree?

distant peak
#

can you show me the characteristic polynomial ?

tulip folio
#

sure

distant peak
#

it is diagonalizable

tulip folio
#

What makes u say that?

distant peak
#

for each eigenvalue, the algebraic multiplicity is equal to the dimension of their eigenspace

#

Thats why I recommand you to read your course before doing exercises

tulip folio
#

ok yeah

#

ye I thought I could do this without reading the notes lol

distant peak
#

If you dont learn your lessons you are kinda dead in linear algebra

tulip folio
#

it seems easy tho once I read the notes

distant peak
#

its very straightforwaded

tulip folio
#

yea

#

sounds good

#

ty brother

#

appreciate it

distant peak
#

np

tulip folio
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tulip folio

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

copper drum
#

Compute the Dirichlet density of the set of primes p such that p - 1, p + 2 and p + 3 are squares modulo p

copper drum
#

I don't even know where to start here

half token
#

Help me i am ponos

copper drum
#

<@&286206848099549185>

marsh citrusBOT
#

@copper drum Has your question been resolved?

copper drum
#

<@&286206848099549185>

elder ridge
#

Rewrite these conditions using legendre symbols

#

Recall the distribution of quadratic residues too

copper drum
# elder ridge Rewrite these conditions using legendre symbols

So, correct me if I'm wrong. but I've always got confused about the significance of Legendre symbols; I know how to work with them, manipulate them, and the Quadratic reciprocity theorem; but I don't actually really get what it says, i.e. I know how to compute its value; but I don't really know what a legendre symbol tells us exactly

#

or really what a quadratic residue is

#

If I would have to guess, I think it says that, using it here; it tells us that ((p-1)/p) = 1, ((p+2)/p) = 1, and ((p+3)/p) = 1

#

Although, I guess it could be the case that the last two could be 0

#

Say if p = 2, then this would satisfy the conditions as 1, 4 and 5 are all squares mod 2 (as 5 = 3 = 1 (mod 2))

#

So ((p+2)/p) I guess could equal 0

#

Oh, so I guess here the whole point is we're trying to compute these values or whatever

#

((p-1)/p) = (-1/p)

#

((p+2)/p) = (2/p)

#

((p+3)/p) = (3/p)

#

I guess, we wanna know first for what values of p is (p-1)/p an integer

#

So, suppose it equals an integer, k, then (p-1)/p = k, this would imply p - 1 = kp iff p - kp = 1 = p(1-k) iff p = 1/(1-k), we need p at least 2; so k must be negative, the only value of which would give an integer p would be k = -2, which gives p = 1 which is NOT prime,all others give non-rational 1/(1-k), so therefore p doesn't divide p-1 here, so we have (-1/p) = 1 which means that p must be congruent to 1 modulo 4

#

<@&286206848099549185>

copper drum
#

Similarly, p for which (p+2)/p is an integer, (p+2)/p = 1 + 2/p which is an integer if p = -2,-1,1 or 2; but 2 is prime so this works

#

So it could be 0

#

But wait actually, if p = 1 (mod 4) then p = 1 (mod 8) (I think)?? So ((p+2)/p) must be 1, but I guess since we know that p = 1 (mod 8) anyway this doesn't really tell us anything new

#

We now want p for which (p+3)/p is an integer

#

(p+3)/p = 1 + 3/p which is an integer if an only if p = -3,-1,1,3; so since p = 3 is prime we need to check this I guess

#

p + 3 is obviously a quadratic residue mod p

#

As we have 3 = 6 = 9 (mod 3)

#

Wait, the whole condition for ((p+3)/p) to be 1 is for p = 1 (mod 4), which we already know

elder ridge
#

this isn't right

copper drum
#

Oh damn that's not true wait

elder ridge
#

You shouldn't think of the legendre symbol as a fraction

#

the fraction is purely notational

#

Basically you're looking for primes such that the following is true:

copper drum
#

so you need to show p doesn't divide a

elder ridge
#

But this is obvious

copper drum
#

For it to be 1, it can't be -1 since we have it's a quadratic residue

elder ridge
#

Assume WLOG p>3 then you're alright

copper drum
#

I don't think it matters though

elder ridge
#

$$\legendre{a}{p}$$

elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

elder ridge
#

does this work

#

nvm

copper drum
#

I've used the fact that p can't divide p -1 to show definitively that p is congruent to 1 (mod 4)

elder ridge
#

Note that $$\left(\frac{a+kp}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{a}{p}\right)$$ for k an integer

elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves

elder ridge
#

p can't divide p-1 by definition

#

or do you mean $$\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = 1 \iff p \equiv 1 (\textrm{mod} 4)$$

elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves

elder ridge
#

which is true

#

The idea is that you can transform these Legendre conditions into congruence conditions

#

and then use the Chinese remainder theorem to get a single congruence condition

#

from then you're done

copper drum
#

Yeah that's what I've used, ((p-1)/p) = (-1/p) which is 1 when p = 1 (mod 4), and this is true since we know that ((p-1)/p) = 1 since p doesn't divide p -1 and we know p - 1 is a quadratic residue or whatever

elder ridge
#

You're just solving the simultaneous equations $$\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{3}{p}\right)=1$$

elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves

copper drum
#

Yes

elder ridge
#

which will give you a condition mod 4, 8, and 12

#

then combine using the CRT more or less

copper drum
#

We don't really gain any more information from the = (2/p) though I think, because this equals 1 when p = 1 (mod 8), which is obviously true because p = 1 (mod 4)

elder ridge
#

exactly but you need to check this

copper drum
#

Right?

elder ridge
elder ridge
#

we deduce that $$p \equiv 1 (\textrm{mod } 8)$$ of course

elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves

copper drum
#

OH WAIT

#

It's not

#

it's stricter

#

5 = 1 (mod 4) but 5 doesn't equal 1 mod 8

#

So we eliminate some primes

elder ridge
#

Do the same for the last case to deduce that but I think there's a much faster way

copper drum
#

Quick question, when we know that (2/p) = 1 iff p = +- 1 (mod 8), I'm confused what that's saying, is that an p = 1 (mod 8) or p = -1 (mod 8) because surely it can't equal both right?

elder ridge
#

yes

copper drum
#

Okay, so we know that p = 1 (mod 8) so far

#

Wow, this is actually really fun maths lol

#

I'm tired of proofs this is actually like problem solvy lol

#

Um, so we have (3/p) = 1

elder ridge
#

This is a little computational

#

If you want to do a programming project on stuff like this you can try this:

elder ridge
elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves

copper drum
#

idrk (3/p) = 1 tells us, obviously since p = 1 (mod 4), we also have (p/3) = 1 mod 4

elder ridge
#

Clearly discard -1, +1 gives us that $$p \equiv 1 (\textrm{mod } 24)$$

elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves

elder ridge
#

So you're done

copper drum
elfin berryBOT
#

LeftySam

elder ridge
#

yeah

copper drum
elder ridge
#

Try it yourself, it really isn't that hard

#

and it tells us that $p \equiv \pm 1 (\textrm{mod } 12)$

elfin berryBOT
#

Jeeves

copper drum
# elder ridge Try it yourself, it really isn't that hard

Oh, I think I have the result in my notes "As an example, we can take a = 3. The above shows that 3 is a quadratic residue modulo p if and only if either
p = +1 (mod 3) and p = 1 (mod 4) or
p = -1 (mod 3) and p = -1 (mod 4). That
is equivalent to either p = 1 (mod 12) or p = - 1 (mod 12) by the
Chinese remainder theorem"

#

That's the result right?

elder ridge
#

yeah

#

this isn't really a proof but it's correct

copper drum
elder ridge
#

you can do this by inspection

#

note the solution will be modlo lcm(12,8) = 24

copper drum
#

Ah okay, so p = 1 (mod 24)

#

So it's all primes of form p = 1 + 24k for integer k

elder ridge
#

yes

copper drum
# elder ridge yes

and the dirichlet density of this is just gonna be 1/phi(24) which is 1/8?
Why did you say it was 0 earlier I'm confused

elder ridge
#

yeah I messed up earlier

#

I'm actually not familiar with dirichlet density

#

but I could guess what it was

copper drum
#

So 1/8th is right do you think?

copper drum
elder ridge
#

yeah I'm sure

#

looks like it relies on a lot of stuff you probably haven't learnt though so I'm wondering why you're working with it

copper drum
#

We've done like L-functions, dirichlet densities, dirichlet characters etc

elder ridge
#

It looks like it relies on Dirichlet's theorem for primes in arithmetic progressions

#

oh have you?

#

nevermind then

copper drum
elder ridge
#

Yeah I get that

#

You know way more about algebraic number theory than elementary number theory then lol

copper drum
elder ridge
#

it happens

#

fair enough

copper drum
elder ridge
#

ow

#

this is why I don't do stats

copper drum
#

a 3 hour exam the morning after a 3 hour afternoon exam lol I walked out after an hour, I averaged 40% for the year and had to retake modules. Not the best, also suffered in my jan 3rd year exams because although I did better (50%) I struggled because I had to focus on my group project

#

Only need 75% average to get a 2:1 now but I'm doing really with these modules so hopefully doable

elder ridge
#

Oh I thought you were in the US with all those percentages haha

#

I mean that seems fair - I did similarly bad in my first year

#

Yeah it looks like the specialisation is working out

copper drum
#

But exams were online so it's different

elder ridge
#

Last time I got over 90% was in school 😦

#

or anywhere near tbh

copper drum
#

and last year I had a bit of a mental breakdown (weirdly, unrelated to uni) so I basically was left with a week to learn a year's worth of content, most modules I would have like an afternoon to learn from scratch lmao; so the fact I passed any I'm taking as a W lol

copper drum
elder ridge
#

yeah

copper drum
#

Yeah I mean no wonder you don't get 90% it's literally Cambridge lol

elder ridge
#

Would be nice though

copper drum
#

You getting a 2:1 from Cambridge is gonna be more impressive than a first from where I'm at tbh

#

Except if ur at like idk UCL, LSE etc.

#

I'm at Southampton so it's russell group but like decent

elder ridge
#

Russell group doesn't matter

#

at least for maths

copper drum
#

Like certain non-Russell groups are good

elder ridge
#

It's an arbitrary cutoff point - if you're looking at course quality/performance standards there are many better points to draw a line

#

but none of it matters anyway

copper drum
#

Yeah, I mean I picked the wrong degree I think; I might end up doing another ug in econ because that's what I wanna end up doing, so 2:1 would be huge because it'll mean I can convert from maths ug to econ masters

#

Anyway

#

Thanks for the help.

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @copper drum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

elder ridge
#

lol fair enough

#

no worries

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fierce pewter
marsh citrusBOT
fierce pewter
#

I'm confused on how to start

marsh citrusBOT
#

@fierce pewter Has your question been resolved?

fierce pewter
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fierce pewter

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hollow cliff
#

given an equilateral triangle with side length 40, find the area of the triangle to the nearest tenth

hollow cliff
#

Would I just do 1/2(40)(40)

marsh citrusBOT
#

@hollow cliff Has your question been resolved?

tropic kindle
hollow cliff
tropic kindle
hollow cliff
#

if its an equilateral triangle i suppose all sides are 40

hollow cliff
tropic kindle
tropic kindle
hollow cliff
tropic kindle
#

have you learnt anything like that

hollow cliff
#

and ill lyk if i know it

tropic kindle
hollow cliff
#

no

tropic kindle
hollow cliff
#

i do know thaty

tropic kindle
hollow cliff
#

yes

tropic kindle
#

its 40, not 90

hollow cliff
tropic kindle
hollow cliff
#

1/2

#

sin 60

#

i think its

#

(radical 3)/2

tropic kindle
hollow cliff
#

i believe its h/40

tropic kindle
#

$\sin60^{\circ} = \frac{h}{40}$

elfin berryBOT
#

Tangerine

tropic kindle
#

you can then find h

hollow cliff
#

34.64

tropic kindle
#

$sin60 = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$

hollow cliff
elfin berryBOT
#

Tangerine

tropic kindle
#

h should be $(40)(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}) = 20\sqrt{3}$

hollow cliff
#

i see

elfin berryBOT
#

Tangerine

tropic kindle
#

then use that to calculate the area

hollow cliff
#

20 radical 3) (40)

tropic kindle
#

it should be 692.8, corrected to the nearest tenth

hollow cliff
#

/2

#

yesd

#

it makes a lot more sense now

#

thank you

tropic kindle
#

npnp

hollow cliff
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hollow cliff

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

still temple
#

Hello

marsh citrusBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

late hare
#

@still temple go the the previous channel you said hello, ask your question there and here do .close

still temple
#

My previous channel for some reason doesn’t show

tall umbra
#

it'll show

still temple
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @brittle notch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wooden grotto
#

not sure what I'm doing wrong here

marsh citrusBOT
wooden grotto
#

we separate the variables and integrate both sides as follows:

∫(1/e^(2u)) du = ∫e^(4t) dt

To integrate the left-hand side, we use the substitution v = 2u, dv = 2 du, which gives:

(1/2) ∫(1/e^v) dv = -(1/2) e^(-2u)

Integrating the right-hand side, we get:

∫e^(4t) dt = (1/4) e^(4t)

Substituting these results back into the original equation and simplifying, we get:

-(1/2) e^(-2u) = (1/4) e^(4t) + C

To find the value of C, we can use the initial condition u(0) = 9. Substituting t = 0 and u = 9 into the above equation, we get:

-(1/2) e^(-18) = (1/4) + C

Solving for C, we get:

C = -(1/2) e^(-18) - (1/4)

#

Substituting this value of C back into the above equation, we get:

-(1/2) e^(-2u) = (1/4) e^(4t) - (1/2) e^(-18) - (1/4)

Simplifying and solving for u, we get:u(t) = -(1/2) ln[2(e^(4t) - e^(-18) - 1)]

#

yet somehow, it's wrong..

cobalt sentinel
#

$- \frac 12 e^{-2u} = \frac {e^{4t}}{4} - \frac {1}{2e^{18}} - \frac 14$

elfin berryBOT
#

Stephen

cobalt sentinel
#

@wooden grotto wanna go thru it step by step after the line above?

#

Wait a second, Lemme try it out myself ig

#

Ok I’m not seeing how u got ur answer

cobalt sentinel
marsh citrusBOT
#

@wooden grotto Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

still temple
marsh citrusBOT
still temple
#

so im doing this problem im getting 1/sqrt3x for my answer

#

but the answer key says this is the answer

stoic saddle
#

y = (1/sqrt(3))x, you mean?

still temple
#

yea

stoic saddle
#

yeah there's a caveat

#

show the book's answer

still temple
#

k

stoic saddle
#

sqrt(3)/3 and 1/sqrt(3) are one and the same.

#

your teacher's three is a bit wonky.

still temple
stoic saddle
#

yes

still temple
#

where does he even get a three from though

stoic saddle
#

wdym

#

are you asking how 1/sqrt(3) becomes sqrt(3)/3?

still temple
#

so to get my answer i did this

#

and multiplied by reciprocal

#

to get 1/sqrt(3)x

stoic saddle
#

yes and ive been trying to tell you that your answer is correct

still temple
#

nvm

#

they equal one another so its the same thing just an extra step thank you

#

he rationalized the denominator

#

anyways thanks

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sudden swallow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

woven harness
marsh citrusBOT
woven harness
#

can someone explain this please

marsh citrusBOT
#

@woven harness Has your question been resolved?

woven harness
#

<@&286206848099549185>

woven harness
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @woven harness

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tribal jungle
#

I seem to be off by exactly 1. I can’t really spot where I went wrong though. Maybe while reindexing the sum, or using the evenness?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@tribal jungle Has your question been resolved?

wild ginkgo
#

i can't read your image tho

tribal jungle
#

Mh is my writing really that bad?

#

It's a discrete time signal

#

$x[n] = a^{|n|} cos(2 \pi f_0 n T)$

elfin berryBOT
#

Learath2

tribal jungle
#

$a = - 0.8$ and $f_0 T = 1/12$ find the energy of the signal $E{x[n]} = \sum_{n = - \infty}^{+ \infty} |x[n]|^2$

elfin berryBOT
#

Learath2

odd valley
elfin berryBOT
#

Tymelord14

tribal jungle
odd valley
#

No problem, these kinds of errors are the worst to parse after a long calculation 🙂

tribal jungle
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tribal jungle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hazy swan
#

why does this equal 4 instead of -1

marsh citrusBOT
knotty trellis
#

why should it equal -1?

#

Did you do 4-(2.5+2.5)?

hazy swan
#

because 2.5 + 2.5 is 5

#

yea

knotty trellis
#

so 4-2.5 is 1.5. Then 1.5+2.5 is 4 so it's 4

sleek lake
#

pemdas is a troll acronym

#

it's not the convention, no one actually does that and it leads to this problem if you do

hazy swan
#

so should I trust left to right or pemdas

knotty trellis
sleek lake
#

if you wanted you could do pedmsa

#

at least it's the right answer, although it's not what people do either

hazy swan
#

if you do pemdas its -1

knotty trellis
#
  1. parenthesis
  2. exponents
  3. multiplication and division
  4. addition and subtraction
dire spire
#

im curious to know how you got -1

knotty trellis
dire spire
#

but isnt it -2.5+2.5

mighty solstice
#

Even if you use pemdas incorrectly like that the negative sign stays with the first 2.5 so -2.5+2.5

stoic saddle
stoic saddle
#

so you read and perform them left to right

stoic saddle
stoic saddle
# sleek lake no?

he's saying that you can rewrite the expression as 4 + (-2.5) + 2.5

hazy swan
dire spire
#

multiply??

dire spire
#

lmao

stoic saddle
#

no, there's no multiplication sign in here and no multiplication going on and there never was any. what are you talking about?

mighty solstice
#

0 is neither positive nor negative so either 4-0 or 4+0 will work. There’s no multiplication here

knotty trellis
#

btw are you 13 or older NubMan?

dire spire
stoic saddle
dire spire
#

thats what i was saying

#

there is no way to get -1

#

or multiply

#

nubman you need to grind harder

late geode
#

whoever is getting -1 is misinterpreting pedmas

knotty trellis
stoic saddle
#

@hazy swan are you still here?

hazy swan
#

ye

stoic saddle
#

ok, first off,

#

as was asked earlier, are you 13 or older?

hazy swan
#

Im older

#

the highest math I took was pre calc lol

stoic saddle
#

k

#

so you're revisiting basic arithmetic now

#

okay, now tell us: do you have any questions left to ask?

hazy swan
#

Not really

stoic saddle
#

ok

#

then you can .close this channel.

hazy swan
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hazy swan

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

celest finch
#

can someone help me solve this one please idk if im supposed to like divide or something

still temple
#

u have to use sin2x=2sinxcosx

#

i guess

stoic saddle
#

you don't have to, but it's a good first move.

still temple
#

after u move cos to the right side

#

left**

#

the take it as a comon factor

#

then solve as it equals to 0

stoic saddle
#

first off

#

!nosols

marsh citrusBOT
#

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

stoic saddle
#

second, "move" is bad

celest finch
still temple
stoic saddle
#

"move this to the other side" is sometimes ambiguous, and even if it isn't, leaves room for error.

still temple
#

i didnt devide

#

if u devide u lose answers

celest finch
#

ok so how would i rewrite it

#

using double angle formula

still temple
#

its sin(2x)=2sin(x)cos(x)

#

so

celest finch
#

right

still temple
#

6sin(x)cos(x)=cos(x)

#

6sinxcosx-cosx=0

#

cosx(6sinx-1)=0

stoic saddle
celest finch
#

why are u guys arguing

#

lol

celest finch
still temple
#

i thought u meant that

#

sorry

marsh citrusBOT
#

@celest finch Has your question been resolved?

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

burnt heart
#

Can someone help me understand why the Answer on the left is incorrect but the answer on the right IS correct?

cobalt sentinel
#

Try plugging in a point like x = 2

#

Is it positive or negative

burnt heart
#

Negative?

cobalt sentinel
#

There u go

#

The one on the left is positive at x = 2

burnt heart
#

Ohh so above the x axis is positive?

cobalt sentinel
#

y values above the x-axis are positive yes

burnt heart
#

Hmm

#

So I can plug in any numbers into the equation? Like 3 or -4?

#

And whatever it gives me means the graph will be negative or positive?

cobalt sentinel
#

Yea u can plug anything in

#

As long as it’s in the domain yea

burnt heart
#

Ooooh okay

#

Tysm!

cobalt sentinel
#

Np

#

Nice pfp

burnt heart
#

Thanks lol

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @burnt heart

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

slow dock
#

What am I doing wrong, the denomenator should be -x^3/3 +O(x^4)

slow dock
main idol
#

Doesn't look like you multiplied and instead added

slow dock
#

Where exactly?

#

?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

cursive leaf
#

How can I help?

slow dock
#

idk where my mistake is

cursive leaf
#

Okay, let me take a look.

#

It looks like instead of multiplying you added instead.

slow dock
#

where+

#

?

cursive leaf
#

The denominator should be -x^3/3 +O(x^4).

#

I can understand that.

slow dock
#

I too get that XD

slow dock
#

werll

#

plz help

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185>

quasi garden
#

?

slow dock
#

if you can walk me throug the entire process would be better too

quasi garden
slow dock
#

sure and thanks

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185>

dire spire
#

don’t spam tag

slow dock
#

sorry...

keen leaf
slow dock
#

Xd

#

well it is...

#

cosx - (1-x)e^-x = (1- x^2/2 + O(x^4)) - (1-x)(1 -x + (-x)^2/2 + (-x)^3/6 + O(x^4)

#

=1 - x^2/2 + O(x^4) - 1 + x - x^2/2 + x^3/6 + O(x^4) + x - x^2 + x^3/2 - x^4/6 + O(x^5)

#

=2x - 2x^2 + 2x^3/3 - x^4/6 + O(x^5)

#

$\cos x - (1-x)e^{-x} = \left(1 - \frac{x^2}{2} + O(x^4)\right) - \left(1-x\right)\left(1 - x + \frac{(-x)^2}{2} + \frac{(-x)^3}{6} + O(x^4)\right)$

elfin berryBOT
slow dock
#

$1 - \frac{x^2}{2} + O(x^4) - 1 + x - \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^4) + x - x^2 + \frac{x^3}{2} - \frac{x^4}{6} + O(x^5)$

elfin berryBOT
slow dock
#

$2x - 2x^2 + \frac{2x^3}{3} - \frac{x^4}{6} + O(x^5)$

elfin berryBOT
slow dock
#

so where is my problem ??? <@&286206848099549185>

marsh citrusBOT
#

@slow dock Has your question been resolved?

slow dock
#

Well

#

I guess i will never find out

summer stream
#

$x^{3}$

elfin berryBOT
#

HAMADY SAKANOKO

summer stream
#

$-\infty$

elfin berryBOT
#

HAMADY SAKANOKO

summer stream
#

$-infty$

elfin berryBOT
#

HAMADY SAKANOKO

twilit grove
slow dock
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @slow dock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

slow dock
#

.reopen

marsh citrusBOT
#

slow dock
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @slow dock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

still temple
#

Curious about this, but is surjectivity arbitrary?

still temple
#

a function $f: A \longrightarrow B$ is said to be onto (surjective) if Range($f$) = $B$

elfin berryBOT
still temple
#

Aka for every $b \in B$ there exists an $a\in A$ such that $\map f a = b$

elfin berryBOT
still temple
#

but the codomain is not unique

#

you can define the codomain to be anything as long as you have Range($f$) $\subseteq B$

elfin berryBOT
still temple
#

Well this also makes me think

#

are two functions with different codomains, but the same range, equal?

marsh citrusBOT
#

@still temple Has your question been resolved?

still temple
#

<@&286206848099549185>

still temple
#

everything you've said makes sense @still temple

still temple
#

a function requires a domain, codomain and rule

#

oh hm thats really interesting

#

so like

#

even if it is like

#

imagine those two functions okay

#

<enumitem>
\

#

oops

still temple
elfin berryBOT
still temple
#

sorry i had a case of "status: i found a solution but my latex wasnt rendering"

still temple
#

for those two functions

#

the domain and range are inevitably the same

#

but i guess the two functions themselves are not the same like you said right

still temple
#

Im not sure when it actually matters though

#

mm yeah

#

also why not R_≥0

#

:p

#

because that would exclude 0 would it not haha

#

thats like

#

$\mathbb{R}_{\geq0}$

#

something u can get from the first function

#

since 0 is in the image of f

#

so cheeto

glacial hedge
still temple
#

wait

#

oh

#

so they would be the same

#

so surjectivity is really just

#

"it depends" lmao

#

some bozo's thing

still temple
#

okay

#

so i will just ask a follow up question

#

because

#

i dont get cartesian products

glacial hedge
#

The set of throws of 2 dice is just the cartesian product of 2 sets of dice throws

still temple
#

[
f: ; \Z\by\Z \longrightarrow \Z \
(n,m) \mapsto n^2 - m^2
]

#

so this was an exercise for us

#

to figure out if it is bijective

glacial hedge
#

How is that actually defined ?

glacial hedge
#

How is n^2 = m^2 an element of Z

still temple
#

oh woops i messed up

elfin berryBOT
glacial hedge
#

Ok

still temple
#

so

#

like one issue i have with this

#

first question: how is the m supposed to still exist with the mapping?

glacial hedge
still temple
#

since we are going from z^2 to z

glacial hedge
#

There exist bijections from N to N^2, why not Z^2 -> Z ?

still temple
#

yeah i am just trying to rationalise it i guess haha

glacial hedge
glacial hedge
#

It exists, but is it this function ?

#

You don't have a clue ?

still temple
#

dont think i am following along particularly no

glacial hedge
#

Could it be injective ?

fair fulcrum
#

there's a bijection from the integers to the positive integers
and then you can just plug that in to the square function

#

because N+ <=> N+^2 is bijective

#

maybe I'm not understanding :(

glacial hedge
#

We weren't really asking about that

fair fulcrum
#

ah

glacial hedge
still temple
#

okay before we proceed

#

let me just ask one thing

#

why is it not
[\Z^2 \longrightarrow \Z^2]

elfin berryBOT
glacial hedge
#

n^2 - m^2 is clearly an integer

still temple
#

oh right it is not some array

#

so like

#

if you wanted to show that it is injective

glacial hedge
#

f(2,4) = -12 for example

still temple
#

then you have to show that
[
\map f {a,b} = \map f {c,d} \implies (a,b) = (c,d)
]

#

somehow?

elfin berryBOT
still temple
#

i am guessing?

glacial hedge
#

If you think it's injective yes

still temple
#

oh hmm alright so like

#

[
a^2 -b^2 = c^2 - d^2
]

elfin berryBOT
still temple
#

[
(a+b)(a-b) = (c+d)(c-d)
]
But now, how does one proceed

elfin berryBOT
glacial hedge
#

There are several ways

still temple
#

oh hmm

#

any good nudge in the right direction?

glacial hedge
#

What makes you think it's injective ?

#

Maybe it isn't after all

still temple
# elfin berry

I don't particularly think it is, i am just trying to find it out using this

#

if i can achieve some contradiction

#

then well like, it is not injective

glacial hedge
#

For example, how could these two things be equal

#

In practice

#

Maybe an edge case where they're conveniently both equal to something special

still temple
#

a+b = c+d and a-b = c-d being one possibility i suppose?

glacial hedge
#

Or maybe it is injective

#

How could that happen?

#

Do you want a bigger nudge ?

fair fulcrum
# elfin berry

are you trying to find that this implies (a,b) = (c,d)

still temple
glacial hedge
#

Yes

still temple
#

oh hmmm

glacial hedge
#

How do you make a product 0

still temple
#

if either one of the terms is 0

glacial hedge
#

Hence

still temple
#

So if a = -b or c = -d i suppose?

glacial hedge
#

For example

#

So can you give an example that shows it's not injective ?

still temple
#

an example that shows it is not injective hmm

still temple
# elfin berry

i mean to find such an example it means i have to prove that this implication is indeed wrong right

#

oh wait

glacial hedge
#

A counterexample is enough

still temple
#

we have just done it?

glacial hedge
#

And is not just an abstract construct lol

still temple
# still temple So if a = -b or c = -d i suppose?

okay i mean like, with this in mind, you do get the first equality that f(a,b) = f(c,d), but to make this injectivity hold we have to show that (a,b) = (c,d), and by considering a = -b and c = d case, then you get (-b,b) = (c,d) but -b is never equal to c under the integers

#

thats my logic i hope i didnt frick it up xd

glacial hedge
#

Well it could

still temple
#

really?

#

oh i see

fair fulcrum
#

does f(4,4) = f(3,3) not disprove injectivity immediately

glacial hedge
glacial hedge
fair fulcrum
#

idk why I picked 4 and 3

#

was thinking about pythagorean triples

glacial hedge
#

Every (n, n) and (n, -n) get sent to 0

still temple
glacial hedge
#

Because it directly disproves injectivity

still temple
#

yeah i was trying to think of a general approach to it

#

but this is way simpler i guess

glacial hedge
#

Rather than showing you can have some abstract counter-example, just show it

still temple
glacial hedge
#

When you can at least

#

But that's most often the case

still temple
#

thats a good thing to know, idk why but i always feel like counterexamples or specific cases are not complete enough

glacial hedge
#

They are

still temple
#

this thinking is completely wrong i know

glacial hedge
#

"look, here's the truth, right in front of you, you can't deny it, it's right there"

fair fulcrum
still temple
#

yeah haha

#

anyways

#

surjectivity

glacial hedge
#

Now if want a bit of a more challenging one, you can try and find whether f is surjective

#

Yeah exactly

still temple
#

but for this case

#

it would mean

glacial hedge
#

Though do note I'd consider that to be quite a step up in difficulty

still temple
#

there exists f(a,b) = c?

#

for all a,b

fair fulcrum
#

finding whether all integers are the difference of 2 squares?

glacial hedge
#

For any c

glacial hedge
fair fulcrum
#

ok I will shh

glacial hedge
#

!nosols

marsh citrusBOT
#

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

still temple
#

okay i did not read that

#

i will just

#

imagine its not there

glacial hedge
#

Which I may be taking a bit too at heart rn but anyways

glacial hedge
glacial hedge
#

Autocorrect making typos

still temple
#

wait what i said was directed at what zfnQRZJT wrote for how to do it haha

#

but regardless back on topic

glacial hedge
#

He just rephrased it as something not in terms of f

still temple
#

oh hmm

#

okay so just i dont get to confused in my thoughts,

We are trying to confirm that for every $c \in \Z$ there exists $a,b \in \Z^2$ such that $\map f{a,b} = c$

Meaning we have to prove that
[
a^2 - b^2 = c
]
holds for all integers

elfin berryBOT
glacial hedge
still temple
#

yeah

#

i just rationalised it

#

okay

#

to prove this...

#

lets see

#

oh okay so we have to try to hunt a counterexample for c

#

well

fair fulcrum
#

a,b in z^2 is an interesting notation
I would say a, b in z

#

but yk valid

still temple
#

i cannot seem to understand how i should prove that

still temple
#

i cant come up with a good counterexample

glacial hedge
#

Get an understanding of the problem

#

Then see if it works or if you have an idea of how to build a counter-example

still temple
#

'do some theory' is pretty vague haha

#

maybe i should come back to this later on? after i get a better understanding?

glacial hedge
#

How about you write m = n+k

#

Try to relate the quantities somehow

still temple
#

wait a question

glacial hedge
fair fulcrum
#

isn't that the same

still temple
glacial hedge
#

k = n-m

#

Trying to rewrite f to something that may be simpler to understand

still temple
#

oh hmm

#

simpler to understand

#

it is more or less just the difference of squares

#

meaning

#

(a-b)(a+b)

#

assume k = a-b

#

then

#

k(k+2b)?

#

this turns into k^2 + 2kb

glacial hedge
#

wlog k >= 0
Then f(n,m) = k^2 + 2mk = k(k+2m)

still temple
#

which is just a quadratic by then, and quadratics are defined over the reals (which encompasses the integers), but they are only defined over the reals for a non-imaginary discriminant

glacial hedge
#

Hint: ||it's about integers||
||Look at some arithmetic property||
||Like parity||

glacial hedge
still temple
#

okay i clicked the first hint

#

its about integers hmm

#

so we have to see if k^2 + 2mk = c holds for all integers c

glacial hedge
still temple
#

my mind was thinking of quadratic properties so i sticked to the first haha

#

but lets think about this

#

k(k+2m) = c

glacial hedge
still temple
#

seems like a really convoluted way to go about it anyways

#

😅

still temple
#

what do i do with this guy hm

#

okay i will click the second hint

#

arithmetic property

glacial hedge
#

Hopefully you see what I mean by that

still temple
#

i can only see distributivity being applicable there

fair fulcrum
#

2m is even

#

k is odd or even

still temple
#

hmm how does that end up helping me now thonk

#

oh!

#

wait

#

odd + even = odd

#

and odd(odd) = odd

#

so whatever we get is going to be odd

#

so we can rewrite c as

fair fulcrum
#

waitwait

still temple
#

2m+1 for some integer m?

fair fulcrum
#

holdon

glacial hedge
#

Arithmetic property such as prime decomposition or parity yes

fair fulcrum
glacial hedge
fair fulcrum
#

welp

still temple
#

well

#

if k is even then it will be even

#

so i mean

glacial hedge
#

Yes

still temple
#

do we split it into cases

#

of either

glacial hedge
#

Yes

still temple
#

oh my god this problem is actually amazing lmao

glacial hedge
still temple
#

alright

fair fulcrum
glacial hedge
#

Gets them to think

fair fulcrum
#

fair

still temple
glacial hedge
#

Indeed

fair fulcrum
#

any true statement can prove that Q is countable thonk

#

/joke

glacial hedge
#

Any false statement as well

fair fulcrum
#

good point

glacial hedge
still temple
#

so assuming $k =2u \textss{for} u \in \Z$ and knowing that $k+2m = 2w+1 \quad w \ in \Z$ as well
then [
2u(2w+1) = c
]
but can we assume that $w = u$ thonk

fair fulcrum
elfin berryBOT
fair fulcrum
#

oh z^2 is not the set of perfect squares it's the set of 2 integers

#

forgor

glacial hedge
#

Yes

fair fulcrum
#

that makes sense

still temple
#

wait yes to which statement mateo haha

glacial hedge
#

zfn

glacial hedge
still temple
#

😭 sorry

glacial hedge
#

k just became 1 out of nowhere

fair fulcrum
#

how come 2u + 2m = 2w + 1

glacial hedge
#

Exactly

#

k is even

still temple
#

oh sorry

#

yes i jsust realised

glacial hedge
#

We said it's even -> even and odd -> odd
Hence looking at 2 separate surjectivity problems

glacial hedge
#

m is just a bystander

still temple
#

yes i did that wrongly, sorry, so with $k(k+2m) = c$, we can assume that $k = 2u$ and $k+2m = 2v$ assuming k is even

elfin berryBOT
still temple
#

that would be correct in this case i suppose?

fair fulcrum
#

it's weird to me that texit takes all the words into consideration

glacial hedge
#

It's beautiful

still temple
#

okay so in this case

#

we have 2u(2v) = c

#

meaning 4uv = c

fair fulcrum
#

true

still temple
#

wait

glacial hedge
#

Hence...

fair fulcrum
#

hence we are 50% done

still temple
#

problem is that uv is never odd, so this never can be odd

glacial hedge
#

Because k is even

fair fulcrum
#

uv can be odd just not 4uv

glacial hedge
still temple
still temple
#

this is where the counterexample comes in i suppose?

glacial hedge
#

You didn't finish the theory yet

fair fulcrum
#

well you didn't do the k odd case but you could

glacial hedge
#

You were one sentence short

still temple
#

one sentence short..

glacial hedge
still temple
#

thats the only thing i can say after that

glacial hedge
#

We know that

#

Do we reach all even numbers ?

#

We didn't do all that for nothing

glacial hedge
still temple
#

oh i dont think u can get to 2

glacial hedge
#

Why

still temple
#

because well c can be 0, but then there is a jump to -4 and below and 4 and above

#

right? thonk

#

like

#

assume u = 1 v = 1

#

you get c = 4

#

u = -1 v = 1

#

you get c = -4

glacial hedge
#

In short, we only reach multiples of 4 !

still temple
#

but there is no way you can get to c=2?

still temple
glacial hedge
#

I'm actually impressed that Toby is still here

still temple
#

so now to fully figure out if it is surjective, we need to see if the odd case can eat up the rest of the integer possibilities other than multiples of 4

#

if it doesnt then this isnt surjective

#

right?

still temple
glacial hedge
#

It doesn't reach even numbers that aren't multiples of 4

still temple
#

oh the odd case can never reach those numbers

#

so we dont even have to do that

glacial hedge
#

Now ofc you can take this exercise a bit further

#

You can ask if every odd integer is reached, and if every multiple of 4 is reached

still temple
#

hmm isnt the second pretty clear? i mean it is simply 4uv after all

glacial hedge
#

I'd say they're both fairly easy yes

still temple
#

u can just hold one of them to be 1

#

and then

#

the other to be any integer

#

and boom

glacial hedge
#

But also technically I thought injectivity would be easy lol

still temple
#

sorry my foundations are horrible since i haven't really built on this all that much

glacial hedge
#

We've all been there at some point

still temple
#

yeah i am trying to build on this hopefully, since i will start doing counting problems which tbh are just sets extra haha

#

but anyways

#

this concludes this incredibly stretched out help channel haha

#

big, big thanks to you three lads @glacial hedge @still temple @fair fulcrum

#

have a great day!

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wild cape

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

glacial hedge
#

Note : all odd numbers are reached

#

Proof: exercise (easy)

still temple
#

i will try doing it now

#

i am actually gonna write all of this cohesively on a separate document

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

still temple
#

helps me solidify the idea much better haha

fair fulcrum
#

I love how you can write all this working out while counterexample c = 2 existed

glacial hedge
#

Yeah but you gotta prove it

#

Prove 2 can't be reached without doing a bunch of theory

#

(n+m)(n-m) = 2
n+m = 1 and n - m = 2: impossible
n+m = -1 and n - m = -2: also impossible
n+m = 2 and n - m = 1: impossible again
Last case: impossible too
Feels much less fun to me

fair fulcrum
#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fair fulcrum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

signal umbra
marsh citrusBOT
signal umbra
#

Linear algebra

#

Kinda forgot

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @signal umbra

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

marsh citrusBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

oak void
marsh citrusBOT
oak void
#

I can't see where i did wrong here

#

I've tried to make both x = 1 and y = 1

#

and got different answers

#

so it is definitely wrong

glacial hedge
# oak void

first line of implicit differentiation should be -2y rather than +2y

oak void
#

how come

#

ah

#

yeah yeah i get it

#

-(2x dy/dx +2y)

#

yeah

#

thanks

#

.close

marsh citrusBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @oak void

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

smoky marsh
#

.reopen

#

so for number 3, after finding a basis, is there a reason that they made z=-t? it would be the same as z=t right?

glacial hedge
#

of course not, it's not the same vector space

#

Span((1, 1,-1)) != Span(1, 1, 1)

smoky marsh
#

but why, since its just a free variable it doesnt matter what it equals to as long as everything else is right

glacial hedge
#

no

#

it's vectors of the form (t, t, -t)

#

they're not independent

smoky marsh
#

so if z=t then my answer would be [-1,-1,1] instead of [1,1,-1]

glacial hedge
#

no that would be the same vector space

smoky marsh
#

ok, so how do i choose the right t

#

what step am i doing wrong.