#help-33
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
Result:
2.1613932e+8
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Syntax error in part "\sqrt{9}" (char 1)
Where did they get 14649 from?
,calc sqrt(15277^2 - 4153^2)
Result:
14701.677455311
it's 15,227
@ionic owl Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Say I have g(2x) and I derive it, does it become g'(2x) or 2g'(2x)?
The latter
Also, differentiate*
Can you explain the difference?
Derivation is like a proof of an equation
Showing where it came from
And differentiation is different
And it's the latter because of chain rule, correct?
Yes
The verb for "to take a derivative" is "differentiate," not "derive." Although, it's a very common mistake
@lost hearth Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the differential equation of this family of curves
?
Even differentiating it would be enough
But don't forget to give the initial conditions
it dosen't have initial conditions
but when i take the derivate
and replace the unknown
is y'=1
but it's wrong
You should have y' = ae^x = y
look
I think the problem is that i don't have to take the implicit derivate right?
.close
Closed by @eager hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the supremum of the empty set -infinity
it's most likely one of those things that when they define what supremum of a set is they realise that supremum and infimum of the emptyset doesn't make sense, so they just define it as sup(E)=infinity and inf(E)=-infinity.
its a pretty sensible definition tho
-infinity is bigger than all elements in the empty set, so it is an upper bound
and it clearly is also the least upper bound, cause there is no smaller number
@ivory laurel Has your question been resolved?
sup is -infinity and inf is +infinity
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i understand why D is correct, but it also says B is correct, and i dont understand why
i think it should be A and D
b
You could try sketching the graph
or imagining what it would look like
as an example for why it's not differentiable just because it's the integral of something
the sign function integrates to |x|
You put constant bounds on your integral
Theres a sign function here?
so the graph you're looking at is just whatever the integral happens to be from a to b
not here it was just an example
do you understand why the graph shows a constant function?
But there are example where the integral of something is also differentiable like e^x is the integral of e^x, which is still differentiable?
yes
Its the same constant as the one i have got
the integral of something can be differentiable or non-differentiable
but you understand why your graph isn't the f(x) from the problem
the orange one
there's no x anywhere in it
it's just a definite integral
it doesn't depend on x
that's not true of f(x) from the problem
Are you talking abt inside desmos?
yes
Oh yea i fixed it now
ah
Its still the same tho, cuz the f(x) or the f(u) doesnt matter, theyre dummy variables right?
U mean 0 to 3?
yes
Well thats the question
Im interested abt the f(x) in the question from x belong to (0,3]
you're right that the interval (0,3] appears in the problem description
but why take the integral on that
what's the reasoning
Look at this, the 4th last line
Since t is in the differential, therefore the bounds are from t=0 to t=x, and ive taken x belongs to [0,4), now i can divide the integrals accordingly to simplify for fractional part (t), like bounds from 0 to 1, make sure {t}=t
Allowing x belongs to [0,4), covers the case for (0,3] which is what the question wants
ok well this is no longer about the graph
I get f(x)= constant , for x belong to (0,3]
So i dont understand why solution says option B is correct
f(x) is not constant
Alright
you just end up evaluating the integral from 0 to 3
but f(x) isn't the integral evaluated from 0 to 3
f(x) is the integral evaluated from 0 to x
But isnt it of our interest that x belong to (0,3]?
it is "of interest", yes
Okay let me think
Yep i am probably wrong
Would it be like this?
I did find out a good way of evaluating f(x) where x is an integer💀
Okay i think f(x) is going to be a piecewise function @tight furnace , but i cannot justify this any other way without looking at the graph
kind of piecewise
The graph is something drawable without desmos
it depends on frac(x) and floor(x)
would be another way to write it
otherwise you get an infinite number of pieces
This is what i could write, but it was only after thinking in terms of the graph of e^{t} vs t
Not differentiable at the points where the definition changes
So B is correct
😮
How would you write it
e^(frac(x))+(e-1)floor(x) i think
but if x from [0,1), then what uve written doesnt match with what ive got, urs would be just e^x
Then it does work, but how did u get this
it doesn't really matter
i knew there had to be a part that repeats every 1 and a part that steps up by the same amount every 1
the part that steps up steps up by e-1 each time
since f(1) = e-1
f(2) = 2e-2
etc
and the part that repeats is indefinite integral of e^x from 0 to frac(x)
@wet zenith Has your question been resolved?
I see
Closed by @wet zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you calculate 4 c)
@cinder galleon Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @cinder galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it says b mod 3 = 2 and b mod 5 = 3
supposedly you can sorta combine them into one
--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
---|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
```this one you can clearly combine into 8 (mod 15)
i don't know the math for it
well i know that you can check 2+3n until it's 3(mod 5) wikipedia calls it sieving but i doubt it's the intended way
maybe it is
basically you find the first, smallest number that satisfies the conditions
ignore that
you can start with 2 because it satisfies #1
increase it by 3 until it satisfies #2, that happens when it becomes 8 after you added 3 twice
or you can start with 3 and increase by 5
then you'll find 8 after one increase
it works with any amount of conditions done in any order (but it has to be possible in the first place)
Closed by @noble horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no
so basically your f'(x) is the slope at any given point right?
yeah
do i need a sign table?
or could i solve the top and bottom?
well a sign table will be easier
basically we can say that when we have f'(t) = 0, then we have a slope of 0 in our graph
well at slopes of 0, the slope potentially changes from a negative to a postive or a positive from a negative
ok
then what
how would u write it
2 is when it = 0
well one more
t^2 - 4 is a difference of squares
so then it would be (t - 2)(t + 2) = 0
ok yes
so we have t = -2, and t = 2 is where our slope is 0 🙂
okay so for the sign chart
here's what you do
okay well then tell me, where would f(t) be increasing and decreasing here?
ok
the point of the sign chart is that sometimes it's not so obvious where it's increasing or decreasing
it should be like this
cause since ist to the power of 1 the sign will change yes
its*
yep perfect
so the negatives are where it's decreasing
and the positives is where it's increasing
is this a sign chart?
yep!
oh i didnt need a sign chart i just wanna know how to do this
like how would u find the critical points
or where would u start*
sorry
oh well the critical points is where f'(t) = 0!
so we did that 🙂
the critical points are where the slope of f(t) is 0
so you always do that when the f'(t)=0?
yep that's the definition
There's nothing critical about when f'(t) = 1 /s
what about this
cause f'(t) never reaches 0
yep! So we can just pick a random point that's not at the asymptote and check out it's sign with f'(t). In this case, f'(t) = - 3/(x-1)^2, so no matter what you plug in for x, you'll get a negative value
so it's always decreasing
which, looking at the graph
make sense 🙂
hint the reason is because (x-1)^2 is always positive (except for where x = 1, which we can't use)
ok i know that but basically a critical point is where an equation should NOT equate to zero correct
the original equation? No. The derivative? yes
or a expression should NOT equate to zero
the CP is the point where f'(t) = 0
i hope that words it better
ok the derivative should equate to 0?
well there's 2 stipulations
we either say that c is a critical point of f(t) if f(c) exists and it holds one of two properties:
f'(c) = 0f'(c) does not exist
so in your example above, we have no critical point since there's not a spot where f'(c) = 0. So the slope is always 1 sign
critical points are where it changes the max and min right
or negative to positive and positive to negative
yes. CPs are the points on the graph where the function's rate of change is altered (+ to - or - to +) and it's also the spot where you'll have local extrema (local min and local max) if the critical point exists
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH OK I GET IT
OHHHH
ty sensei llama
@compact valley Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @compact valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi i need some help with some geometry that i dont really understand
180(n-2)
that’s the formula for the total degrees of a shape’s angles
n = number of sides
and then you can add up all the angles and set it to that number
yes i understand that my problem is finding the x it doesnt really leads me to an answer when i try
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @cloud sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I go about writing 34 in a(x-r)(x-s) form? FOIL?
or should i just plug into a graphing calc and then find the vertex using calc > min/max, and then insert the found vertex into factored form?
or do i need to find the x-intercepts to insert into factored form?
definitely unsure of how to solve this
factorize by the things in front of the xs
inside each parenthesis
factorize by -8 in the first parenthesis
and by 5
in the second one
So when I factored it I got -3[4(-2x)5(x+2)]
did i factor that correctly?
or would it be -3[8(0.5-x)5(x+2)]
or am i not doing that right at all?
@clear plume Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @clear plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys
I have a question on how to find the slope on a line
I watched this video and the guy did
Y1-y1/x1-x2
Shouldn’t it be the opposite such as y2-y1/x2-x1?
doesnt matter
Equation of a line is y=mx+c isolate y and x coeff is slope
doesnt
try multiplying it with (-1)/(-1)
Oh
@agile phoenix can u tell me which lines slope are u trying to find?
(y1-y2)/(x1-x2)
=(-1)(y1-y2)/(-1)(x1-x2)
=(-y1+y2)/(-x1+x2)
=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
So it will eventually be the same
That's just notation
Because if u get negative it will cancel
Don’t matter what side side u start from
Yes
Oh thx
By the way the quote on your bio actually hit me lol
So inspirational
Lol
.close
Closed by @agile phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you find the missing value?
@woeful sluice arrange in ascending order whatever is the middle term
@woeful sluice Has your question been resolved?
how exactly
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@livid maple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Oh
@livid maple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @livid maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
( translated ) Study the injectivity, surjectivity and bijectivity of the functions :
What is the problem?
can you tell me when the function f is injective?
@edgy flint Has your question been resolved?
What is injectivity property
If there's a function f:A->B then the function is injective if every x from A has a unique value y from B
the parameters confuse me
in this case i should prove that the function is strictly increasing or decreasing to show that it' s injective
but for f it is strictly increasing
Use derivatives ig
idk if they are useful here
That isn't necessary the function is continuos
And linear
With derivative>0
So a is injective
.close
Closed by @edgy flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@cobalt sentinel Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @cobalt sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont really understand this
Which one
For this you just get the coefficient of x on both sides to the same number
And see if the constant is the same on both side
I doubt
Wdym
Oh nvm I misread the question xd
Just solve for each equation and see what x equal to
@fierce beacon Has your question been resolved?
the prompt in general 😨
but it says dont depend on solving
Maybe look at which ones are multiples of each other?
Like u can factor out the 3 for equation V
And u will get equation I
im a little dumb can you give example of what factoring 3 out looks like
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
welp
yes, we in vc together, but we still don't get it
yes but in a vague setting like this, is confusing
so do you understand that all elements in a class [S] are all bijections of one another?
so they link together? one-by-one?
yes, all elements of U in [S] can be mapped one-to one and onto elements of T in [S]
ok so are we saying the representative set is an element in [S]_R
and we can say that because [S]_R is bijective
not sure what you mean there
me neither 😭
Let's work with examples. Do you see why {1,2,3} and {5,6,7} are bijective sets?
$1\mapsto 5$, $2\mapsto 6$, $3\mapsto 7$
Toby
right I see now
they dont even have to be numbers, it can be anything
ok
so like {sheep, cow, dog} is bijective to {1,2,3}
and notice they all have 3 elements
yeah, they are equal under the equivalence relation
in carnality
yup
ahhhh
so all sets bijective to {1,2,3} have the same cardinality (namely all have 3 elemensts)
yeah exactly
natural numbers?
it seems that you are trying to show that natural numbers have "infinite" cardinality
and to formally describe the notion of "infinite"
(countably infinite)
theres a few nice pics here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality#Comparing_sets
i've almost got this
so equiv. classes are bijective, and the cardinality is equal between the equiv. classes
yup, thats precisely what's happening here
(you probably meant "members of equivalent classes are bijective", where these members are sets)
so members of equiv. classes are bijective, and the cardinality is equal between the equiv. classes
right?
cardinality is equal between members of the equiv. classes
equivalence classes are groups of sets
equivalence tells us things about the members of the sets
so like this? equiv. class = {(1,1), (2,2), (3,4), (5,4)}
yup
yeah
and we can basically add this to other rep. sets in the equiv. class to make it infinitely countable
yup exactly
gl :)
Closed by @fickle fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
been stuck on this one for a bit, cant solve for a or b on their own, just doesnt feel like theres enough information, even when i know the correct answer already i just cant get to it (doing question b)
heres the mark scheme, not sure how they obtained an equation without b in it
like this? or am i misunderstanding or starting in the wrong place
set ln(81) = ln(b)
could you please explain how thats possible to drop the 2a - 10?
ahh so is it that there isnt a possible scenario where:
ln(b) = ln(81) + x
wouldnt equal an integer?
wouldnt solve for b as an integer*
is there another method to solve for a first?
is that a rule with logs? wasnt aware of that
well you're also told that a is an integer
Closed by @austere berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
were you doing this with a calculator
try to do it without one
what exactly were you doing with your calculator
wait, i will show you
Closed by @heady orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone walk me through this solution please. I don't really get it.
In particular, where exactly did the value 3.57 come from?
@fading raptor Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> 👋 🙏
,calc sqrt(2*6371/1000)
Result:
3.5695938144276
@fading raptor
But why?
Are you asking where the expression $d = \sqrt{2 \times 6371 \times \frac{h}{1000}}$ came from?
tatpoj
I don't get how that equation simplifies down to 3.57*h^(1/2)
I see the calculation, but how does that get simplified down?
Exponents are distributive over multiplication
So
$$\sqrt{2 \times 6371 \times \frac{h}{1000}}$$
$$=\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{6371} \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{1000}} \times \sqrt{h}$$
$$=\sqrt{2 \times 3671 \times \frac{1}{1000}} \times \sqrt{h}$$
$$=3.57 \times \sqrt{h}$$
Apparently there's a compile error but it's still showing what I wanted so whatever
@fading raptor Does that help?
Sorry lemme read through quickly
Also pretty sure this is the compile error
oh lol
If it was bugging you
tatpoj
Much better
There we go
Basically you can distribute exponents (including roots) over multiplication
They just evaluated the square root of all the constant factors to 3.57 and left the sqrt(h) out of it
I just don't get how it goes to *h when it's +h in the original equation
tatpoj
Then in part (ii) it says we that if $h$ is small, we can approximate $d$ by $d = \sqrt{2Rh}$
tatpoj
Do you see why that approximation works?
d = sqrt{2Rh} is the formula we use to get here
So I just need to state why it should be a somewhat accurate approximation if h is small
And then work through the approximation equation to reach 3.57*h^(1/2)
Right...? 
Agh but where does the /1000 come from?
so h is in metres and d is in kilometres, I'm guessing that's why h is divided by 1000
but in that case, why isn't the h in 3.57 * h^(1/2) divided by 1000 too?
ok wait
nvm
Yes, that's right
That's why h was replaced by h/1000
Once we do that, it's already taken care of, you don't need to divide by 1000 again
It's the same h
Closed by @fading raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@hollow coyote Has your question been resolved?
@hollow coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hollow coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Using a double-angle or half-angle formula to simplify the given expressions, If cos^2(28deg)-sin^2(28deg)=cos(Adeg), then A = _____________ degrees
find A = ? degrees
@neat plover Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@neat plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For a graph like this, do we say it is increasing from 0 to 60 in parenthases or brackets?
[0,60] or (0,60)
looks like its increasing from -infinity
I didn't mention the problem sorry but it involes the price at which something is sold and the revenue made
x is the price
and y is the revenue
if the domain is [0,120] then it would be [0,60)
Since 60 is not increasing, it's flat lined
so its increasing from 0 up to 60
but at 60 nothing happens
is what you are implying
would it be (60,120] for decreasing?
yeah
Not implying I'm stating
no problem
.close
Closed by @pastel rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the power set of {2,{0,3}}
not sure how to write the 0 and 3
we don't consider {0, 3} separately. The power set is just the 2 elements
so { {empty set}, {2}, {0,3}} ?
yep!
oh yes you're right
wdym
{ {}, {2}, {{0,3}}, {2, {0,3}} }
👍
@hearty herald Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
well, what is d(λ)? and for a symbol a and word w, what is d(aw)?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Sorry i didnt see this
d(lambda) is lambda
D(aw) would be aa • d(w)
well there you have it.
How did you know that a is a symbol in the reverse definition?
dunno, maybe it wasnt. and it isnt really important.
so long as you simply make yourself aware of what means what.
do you think you could help me out with (b) as well?
im having trouble figuring out what the base case is meant to be
the base case is the empty string
rn i have (w)R = w
and i proved it using (lambda)R = lambda
because for this, the base case seems to be way more complex
thank you
sorry, i need to disappear for a phone call.
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is a contour
In complex analysis? In differential geometry?
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Both?
im not sure i couldnt find anything good online
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @regal rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Complex functions are generally supposed to have a domain that contains a nonempty open subset of the complex plane.
Its from wikipedia, what does it mean?
When you do complex analysis
You need to be able to derivate
To derivate you need to compute a limit
To do so you need an open set surrounding your point
open set surrounding my point??
Yes. Imagine you want to compute the derivative of $f$ in $z$. It is defined as $\underset{z_{0} \to z}{\lim} \frac{f(z)-f(z_{0})}{z-z_{0}}$. For it to work you need $f$ to be defined in $z_{0}$ "around" $z$ to compute the limit.
black_couscous
makes sense!
when is it not the case?
Imagine $f: \mathbb{N} \longrightarrow \mathbb{C}$. It's difficult to define a notion of derivative for this
black_couscous
hmm
Let's take $f: n \in \mathbb{N} \longrightarrow n \in \mathbb{C}$. Can you compute $\underset{z_{0} \to z}{\lim} \frac{f(z)-f(z{0})}{z-z{0}}$?
black_couscous
No you cannot define a limit
Because to compute a limit you would need to take $z_{0}$ very close to $z$
black_couscous
Here the distance is either $0$ either superior to $1$
black_couscous
yup
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i explain that this is fals
a counterexample ought to do
i cant seem to get one ://
dont think too complicated
what is a simple subspace in R^2 for which you can easily see orthogonal projections for example
uhh
@hollow sun Has your question been resolved?
@hollow sun Has your question been resolved?
@hollow sun Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand inverse equations please
🥲
I am just asking
I don't have an example in specific, I want to know in general how to find an inverse function
Because the guides online are really confusing for my pea size high school brain
Uhhh for example 5x-4y=18 I guess
use rules of algebra to solve for x
In mathematics, you built up a series of rules and concepts to solve for equations. At most, they were series of equations, but nevertheless, an application of some rules to get something out. In higher mathematics, you start by unraveling these built up rules and notions - focusing on reconstructing them with what is know and what can be assess...
I think I'm missing something
Because I got x=(4y/5) + (18/5)
And it feels like I didn't really solve it
Okay so the inverse is the opposite of the solved equation
"opposite" is vague
definition of inverse of a linear function $f(x) = ax + b$ is the function $g(x) = cx + d$ such that $f(g(x)) = x$
riemann
riemann
So an inverse function multiplied by your original function will always give a product of x
so here $y = f(x) = (5x - 18)/4$
riemann
multiplication is not the same as composition
f(x) * g(x) != f(g(x))
composition is "plugging in"
if you read this carefully, it is not (ax+b) * (cx + d)
check the answer you got $g(x) = 4x/5 + 18/5$ is the inverse of $f(x)$
riemann
@charred edge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @charred edge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To find the position vector d, why can I not subtract -2 from -1 and 1 from -2 and 5 from 2?
@hazy ruin Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
If you want to go from P to Q you calculate q1 - p1, q2-p2, q3-p3
.close
Closed by @hazy ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know how to use the fact that the two vectors are independent
It's the very first week of the course so I'm a noob 🙂
How do I start this?
@tight obsidian Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>, Should I add something more?
@tight obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct? 16 not 18 mistype
think I did it entirely wrong
If 8+8 = YX how did you get 18
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Also what confuses me is how do we know that the sides are equal
didn't realize myb
idk
I think its wrong
i guess we can assume so, since there is no more information given
if they are not equal i dont think we can solve
Yeah that just seems kind of wrong
8+8=16 btw
But yeah everything looks right
So then Just leave at this I guess?
Ye
ah yeah
can you help me out with this one @raven olive
How do i find AC from the given lengths
Well start off by writing down what you do know
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I cancel out the 2 variables?
@vagrant minnow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get help on 7 and 8
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
- is just basic derivative
Just use the power rule
f'(x) = 6x - 5
Substitute x = 10
7 is just the sum and product of a quadratic equation
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
oh alright
@still temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand how the answer is log ((x+1)^2/3)/x^1/3(x-3)^1/3)). how does the (x-3)^1/3 get to the denominator? shouldnt it be in the numerator?
use log properties
i did but wouldnt a/b/c mean c moves to where a is?
show what you tried
$\frac{\br{\frac ab}}{c} \neq \frac{a}{\br{\frac bc}}$
ℝamonov
order of operations are important
it'd be clearer if you didn't use skyscraper fractions
$$=\frac13 \bigg[ \log\br{(x+1)^2 \cdot \frac 1x \cdot \frac{1}{x-3}}\bigg]$$
ℝamonov
@tender latch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tender latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yea thats my room lighting
hello
im stuck at reading the diagram and finding out the angle pair, ( corresponding, interior, alternate interior )
how to figure out the angle pair ?
what kind of angles are 1 and 3?
corresponding , alternate internal, alternate external?
alternate?
yes
remember
2 angles cant be alternate if they are on the same side
they are only on opposite sides
ok?
yes got it
good
if 2 angles are corresponding, how are they?
look at the answer choises
you can look at the drawing if you don't know the answer
yes
yes
i completely missed this lesson so im rlly lost ty for help
no
i think for 3 and 5 i would put neither
?
no
if 1 angle is 90
and the other is let's say 91
because it's more than the first one
90+91=181
so they will never equal 180
just had a brain rot moment tbh
i tend to overthink questions
so would i be correct with 3 and 5 putting alternative interior and circling neither?
no
if 2 angles are alternate interior then they are equal
and ours are not equal
so they cant be alternate internal
it cant be interior becaus they are not interior
4 and 5 arent corresponding
yes
kk
3 and 5 arent corresponding
would 3 and 5 be alternate interior?
no
ok so interior
4 and 5 interior, equal. 1 and 3 corresponding equal, 3 and 5 interior, neither is what i have down
@uncut ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @uncut ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why do we use log base e to solve exponent problems instead of log base x
can you give an example
Sure!
This a YouTube short I found while scrolling
The way they solved for x
Why did they use the natural log
Instead of log base x
Why would ln work
I mean, it should work, but we dont know really know the domain i guess
Wdym domain
Oh
But you described it in terms of ln
Wouldn’t that still happen
Even if you used ln
log is base e so it’s fine
it doesn't matter what base it is, you can take any base you want as long as it is defined
here you could also take log base x too, since x^x is defined on [0, infty), however, this would exclude the case x=0, but that is not really our problem
no
yes
log base 10 for 100 = 2
2
If you used base e
You would get something else
im sorry, but i dont understand what you are trying to say
log_10(100) is not equal to code
neither is "code" a numerical value iirc
It’s my phone I’m sorry
Not relevant we’re talking about applying log to both sides of an equation
You’re talking about 2 diff quantities
OHHH I’m so dumb
yes, log_10(100)=2 but like pure said, that's not really related here
because sci liked to
Sci!
