#help-28
1 messages · Page 301 of 1
Cause now i have $\sin(x)\cdot\cos(x) - \int\sin(x)\cdot(-\sin(x)) dx$
So i need to do IBP again
Right?
yea
Not sure how you got that
dream
That's better
Don't
I believe
What is the most famous trig identity
And so i dont think IBP is a good method
Right
Okai
So replace that sin^2, then split the integral
you can do another IBP for this to get integral trig repetition but you could solve this in 2 lines with the double angle identity
Half angle formula prolly
But then i need to integrate sin^2(x)
... no
Double angle identity?
cos^2(pi/2 - x) = sin^2(x)
Could work?
That's awful
Just use double angle tho
But what do you mean?
They are very weak at trig
$\cos^2(x) = \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\cos(2x)$
Triaxyz
From what I've seen
that's it
They didn't know what sec was
Yes i dont know what sec is
You have $\int \sin^2(x) dx$ do you not? So replace $\sin^2(x)$ using $\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)=1$
Nel
1/cos(x)=sec?
Ye
This is the problem
Are you familiar with this identity? @long helm
$\int\cos^2(x) dx$
dream
@long helm
I give up, there's too many distractions anyway
Noo
Wait
$\int\cos^2(x) dx$
dream
I need help with this one
okay dream. we integrated the square of cos(x). we got to the integral of the square of sin(x). we want to replace sin^2(x) in terms of cos^2(x) using pythagorean theorem
okay wait no
god this is getting cofusing
please write your work down
I'm not going to do this until the channel clears up
or we can go the simpler route to reducing the exponent @long helm uk the formula for cos(2x), right?
This is where i struggle…
And this is the original problem
3.107 (b)
@queen crater
Hope its ok i pinged youu
maybe its the handwriting maybe its the german, but does the question ask for the integral of the square of f(x) or the integral of f(x)
The square
Because they want me to find the volume
yeah it's the disk method
Its not German 😭😭😭
It's pi r^2 over [0,2pi]
Disk method?
alr sorry def looks eastern to me tho
it's exactly the process you wrote out already, don't worry about the name since that's what we call it in the US
please tell me 
Ohh okai
Do you understand the way to integrate using the double angle formula?
well either way. first tell me what cos(2x) is. that makes this so much more simpler
Wait let me search it up
@long helm
it's easy to derive if you know angle sum identities already
So what do you want to do? Learn that formula or proceed with IBP?
Or waait
I think i know
Learn that formula
The formula
Then you don't need me
Do you mean this formula: cos^2(x) = cos2x +sin^2(x)?
$\cos^2(x)
\ \cos^2(x) = \cos(x) \cdot \cos(x)
\ \implies \cos^2(x) = \cos(x) \cdot \cos(x) - \sin(x) \cdot \sin(x) + \sin(x) \cdot \sin(x)$
Triaxyz
yes, that's part of it
do you agree with this process?
No
explain
what happens if you add them?
Ohh okai
yeah
With the process
Yess
now, what identity does $\cos(x) \cdot \cos(x) - \sin(x) \cdot \sin(x)$ remind you of?
Triaxyz
cos(x+x)
Triaxyz
with this line above you have proved the equation you stated
now
Ohh okai
what can we change sin^2 to?
Cool
Well we want to remove the exponent?
yes we want to relate the square cosine to something of power 1
so what can we do to the sine to clean the equation up a bit?
it would be the negative of that
Ohh yes
I was thinking to use 1-cos^2 instead, because I figured you were unfamiliar with the double angle identities
But how do you remember all the identities?
part practice part good memory
Oh okai
also if you forget one then deriving helps a lot
But can we use this one?
you can
I am just super confused when it comes to the english names haha
or you can also use sin^2 = 1 - cos^2 up to you
But then we have cos squared again
I will show you why that does not matter
This one
The one you wanted
$\cos^2(x) = \cos(2x) + 1 - \cos^2(x)$
Triaxyz
Triaxyz
yes
Wow
now you have a relation for cos^2 and a cos term of power 1
Yess
But its possible to do the same for sin^2(x)?
Right?
yes
you just use cos(2x) = cos^2 - sin^2 to move things around from here then you get to the double angle identity for sin^2
np
or rather start from cos^2 = 1 - sin^2 since you now know what cos^2 is
But sin(2pi)=sin(4pi)?
yes, both equal zero
$\sin (n \pi) = 0$ for all integers $n$
Tillman
Look
I have done something super silly somewhere cause the answer is not correct
The volume cant be zero
Ohh i see something
I switched from 1/4 to 1/2
But that cant be the only mistake
first of all, you are multiplying the integrals with bounds applied rather than subtracting them
This is also incorrect
@long helm Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @long helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain this to me.
30
do you know what R^3 is in terms of x, y, z?
"Describe in words"
sketching in 3D is kinda painful..
Well, you could think about it like that, but if you wanna draw it on your 2D page, you need to draw the z-axis on the paper as well
the coordinate system can look like this
now consider all the points with z coordinates = 2, what shape do you think these points will make
have you done z = -2 already?
oh you're supposed to do 30
okay yeah, lets do x < 4 then
i'd start by thinking about x = 4 first
dont think of it like a diagonal, imagine it in 3D
and there are more points with x-coordinate 4
all these 3 points have x-coordinate 4
here is a side view
but i wanna learn how to draw on paper
now imagine a set of all such points with x coordinate 4
do you think it will be a single point? Line? Plane? Or something else?
plane
okay great
now x < 4 means that the x coordinate is not equal to 4, but smaller than it
it will basically be all the points behind the plane
more precisely, you can say that it's the half of the space which contains the origin (because "behind" is dependent on where you look from)
the key is confusing : it says represents halfspace consisting of all points behind the plane x = 4. The half space is confusing me
the plane divides the space into 2 "halves"
thoes halves are called halfspaces (one of them is behind, the other one is in front of the plane)
similarly to how lines divide planes into halfplanes
can i just avoid the term though its confusing
as for how to sketch it, its kinda difficult, but I'd probably do sth like this
and then you can shade the "cube" i suppose
you should probably get used to it if your teacher uses it
he doesnt but the key said it so wanted to clarify
its not that difficult of a concept
just like lines divide plane into 2 half-planes, planes divide space into 2 half-spaces
Closed by @ruby fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @gusty bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me how to do algebraic expression with multiplication, division, addition and subtraction
!da2a
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
@prisma heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So theres a slight issue there
for example, the statement "x < y" is one predicate
if you negate it, what would be true?
How you do say x is not smaller than y? what must be true then?
then x is larger than y?
yes, >= to be specific
ohh greater or equal to
so every time you negate a > or < it flips it and turns it equal to?
yup, because thats the opposite statement!
ahh okay so other than that its correct?
yeah if you do it for all the inequalities
alright bet I did that
so on c now so far I have there is n (
ohh wait let me try something'
here i have this but im not sure how to show the predicate
Oh im not sure the directions are vague
also where does the x come from? make sure to define it
actually it is probably better if you keep it like this
for understanding
There is a number n
you've got that part
how would I define the x? put a for all x behidn the parentheses?
Yup after the exists n
because its "for no other number"
But you gotta think about it
other
hold on with c
its not quite right
the question taken literally was:
"there is a n such that for no other number x, x <= n"
*other * is a special word
what do you think that means for x?
wait would I have to put another set of parentheses? like in b?
if x is another number than n, what condition do you need to put on x before you make your statement?
what has to be true about x in order for the given statement to be made?
x is greater than n?
other as in different
thats equal to not (x <= n) which is fine
but which xs are we talking about?
other number x
other numbers?
that its greater than n?
hint: implication
waittt
and just not equal
different
not the same as n
!=
$x \ne n$
flynger
there exists n for all x if x >n then not(n>=x) ?
just if x is not n (aka different than n)
then not(n>=x)
which you can simplify the not(n>=x) to just x > n
im sorry im super confused is it just the simplification? or is there more
it felt like we were talking about more
flynger
flynger
flynger
then $x > n$
flynger
The other than n part is reflected by if x is not n
and then you can make the statement like normal
do you show the if x is not n part with a not equal sign?
sry i have to go for a bit
its okaywill you be bakc or no?
alright i didnt know we were allowed to put those
so yeah it should be $\exists n \forall x (x \ne n \implies x > n)$
flynger
In simple terms, there is a number n such that for any other number x, x is bigger
oh wait if i have the (xnot = n) then x>n is that fine?
You shouldn't because we are just translating sentences
we dont know the context of what x and n can actually be
okay ill fix that then
oh its okay it was probably wrong
if you can
its not wrong just cleaner if you rewrite equals into not equals
or <= into >
okay did you get a chance to look at d?
yes
i need to pass the not along
here let me send the updated one
ohh wait
i slipped up
x and z are there is
and it wouldnt be >= it would just be >
well hold on
first
x < n < z is equivalent to x < n and n < z
so negate it properly without any shortcuts
wait do you mean give them the not? im confused
yea
whats the negation of x < n and n < z
theres an invisble "and" there basically
so its going to turn into an or
x>n or n>z
would the = make sense though because its saying in between it cant be equal to then?
yeah but you negated the entire thing
oh
and the lack of = from before comes from them being different to n right
but after you negate its different
its not between
so either one of them is the same as n (=) or n is bigger than both or smaller than both
$\neg \forall n \exists x \exists z (x < n < z)$
flynger
$\exists n \forall x \forall z \neg (x < n < z)$
flynger
$\exists n \forall x \forall z (x \ge n \vee n \ge z)$
flynger
.. wait why
there exists n
such that for all x, z
x or z is the same as n
or
x is greater
or z is smaller
why does that feel iffy
wait you dont have to seperate the greater than and equal to right?
okay good
of what the opposite should be
so this is sorta a weird case imo
im not sure whats going on exactly
your original statement seems intuitively right but its simplifed
just saying each n has some x smaller than it and some z bigger than it
but once you reversed it seems to break down because
there can still be a z smaller than n and and an x bigger than n
that still puts n in between right
so thats not strong enough for a counterexample
yeah wait
So you should start with
x < n < z or z < n < x
and i think thatll fix it
but its hella weird
i think thats what i was saying earlier with the <=
so still do the there is and for all at the start
okay like this you're saying?
on the d line
well
sorry
you'll have to negate x < n < z or z < n < x
from scratch
since we didnt have that before
(x < n and x < z) or (z < n and n < x)
not ((x < n and x < z) or (z < n and n < x))
when you negate the ands and ors flip tho
alright! and its good now?
Awesome..
using propositional logic
umm like what
yk what its fine thank you for helping me i appreciate it
honestly you probably didnt need to negate the insides
since the question didnt ask
sorry
you couldve probably left it outside hte parenthesis for these ones i guess
nahh thats okay without you i still wouldve been at the start
im bombing my test on this either way ...
dont think like that
its not that bad
once you think of it as formalizing what you already understand
to be more precise
and yea its a little bit more confusing
this is just one part thats the thing theres a statements part implications part rules of logic proofs and proofs on discrete structures
do you have any study recomendations?
dang alright its okay
I would just make sure that for each of the content topics you fully understand it
if something is amiss, figure out what is missing in your understanding
Practice helps but the goal of practice is just to understand smth intrinsically
hmm alright you helped me with understanding some parts more, thanks
Yeah don't be scared, this is supposed to help you understand logic better
its a little dense at times but
how about starting with easier ideas and practice with those?
and then trying more complicated statements
Ill try to keep that in mind..
everything complex is just a bunch of simple things combined after all
Closed by @gusty bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I hope this type of question belongs here, as it is not necessarily about a problem/certain subject
I'm currently failing maths pretty badly, with my average being 4 (5 is required). For americans, my grades are basically a B+ and 3 Fs
So my question is, how do I actually get good at maths. I also want to apply for a scholarship after I finish highschool on top of trying not to fail, So I need to study for the current lesson as well as taking highschool maths from the beginning. I have no idea how to study, we rarely get homework or practice exercises, the teacher speeds through lessons and I can't really understand anything. I don't have a study routine either and apart from just doing exercises and hoping for the best (which got me an F the last 3 times) I have no idea what to do
the main thing you can do is practise and practise
just blindly do problems, make mistakes
and then check where you went wrong
where can i get problems from
books
or tell chatgpt to give you some
tell the chapters. I can suggest some books
Would help a lot
and about taking highschool maths from zero, do you think Khan Academy is good enough? Because sure it's helpful but I feel like its not enough to make me above average
The scholarship I want to apply for is called MEXT and the maths exam is pretty hard
A bit below olympiad level id say
If you wanna pass, then yes
if you want scholarships, then no
what topics are we talking about
highschool maths
so like algebra, calculus
trig, do S.L.Loney
I should probably also mention that I'm from romania and I don't know how many of these books I can find
online resources would be of great help
for the scholarship i think it's both
most books have online versions nowadays
euclidean, do evan chen
coordinate do S.L.Loney
I don't think we've started calculus in school yet so I can probably worry about that next year
right now we're on trigonometric equations and that typa stuff
exponential equations etc
and I also really really suck at logarithms
only thing hard about log is calculation
Is it?
for calculus there are quite a lot of books with exercises
Spivak, Lang, Apostol
I usually remember the formulas but fail to make good use of them
As in I don't realize that I'm supposed to use it when solving problems
that's what you learn by practise
Makes sense
as for the books/problemsets often they are made for specific exams in mind (at least on high school level)
we have like hundreds pages long books with exercises in poland for high school exam
so you can try googling for the name of the exam you'll be taking (or some other exam as long as you know the language)
also if you have a scientific bookstore somewhere nearby you might check there
or at a page of scientific publishers (romania probably has one)
@brisk apex Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brisk apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if $e \in L$, then we must have $e = r + q(\pi+i e)$ for some rationals $r, q$
bloubbloub
actually nvm
me stupid
but here's an answer that uses something else https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/683084/field-not-closed-under-complex-conjugation
@trim osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @trim osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{Problem 7} (1 pt.). Let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of real numbers. We consider the following two conditions:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] The series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$ is convergent.
\item[(b)] For every non-decreasing sequence of numbers $b_n > 0$, such that $b_n \to \infty$, we have $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{b_n} \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k = 0$.
\end{enumerate}
k
I need some help with b->a
so I guess I suppose A_n is divergent
and then try to find some b_n sequence
but idk how to choose it
and so you're trying to do it by contradiction?
yes
hmm have you tried looking at some specific example? Even something as simple as (an) = 1
no, let me try this
b_n = n would suffice but not in the general case, now ill try a_n = 1/n
try something oscillatory after that
like (-1)^n
btw do you know the abel summation thing?
its doable without it, but it can help
(summation by parts is what i mean)
this?
yeah, this
you can try applying it
If you needed another hint, once you rewrite it with abel, you can ping me
ok I got $\frac{1}{b_n} \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k = A_n - \frac{1}{b_n} \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} A_k (b_{k+1} - b_k)$
k
and imma need another hint yea
okay great
the first term is just the partial sum of A, you cant really control that
but the second term can be controlled very well
if you keep bk constant most of the time, you can control exactly which terms Ak will appear in the sum
because constant bk means that bk+1 - bk = 0
and you can decide when to make jumps, which will add the Ak to the sum
@neon surge Has your question been resolved?
want another hint?
maybe I can use the reverse of the Cauchy theorem thing somehow to know which A_n to control
idk just a thought
not sure which one you mean now
oh hmm
havent thought about that, but it could work
What I did was considered some "nice" subsequences of (Ak) which converge to where I want and then worked with them
so we would need Ak bounded for this right?
that would do that case\
well, kinda
if you're relax the defns a bit, you can consider the subsequences which "converge" to infty
by only keeping bn constant and only sometimes increasing it by +1, the 2nd sum becomes simply an average of the chosen Ak, at which bk increases
and if the chosen Ak converge to some c (or infty), then then the averages will also convverge to c (or infty)
so you gain a complete control over the 2nd sum
,texsp ||$\frac{1}{b_{n}}\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}a_{k}\left(b_{k+1}-b_{k}\right)=\frac{1}{p}\sum_{k=1}^{p}a_{n_{k}}$||
MathIsAlwaysRight
||this is what i meant, once you pick the subsequence, you can pick bk such that the sum becomes a simple average, the bk increases by 1 at every an_k u wanna include||
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you show
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\ln(P_n)}{n^2}=0$$
where
$$P_n=\prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-(-1/\phi^2)^{i})$$
Axe
My first instinct would be $\ln(P_n) = \sum \ln(1-(-1/\phi^2)^i)$
Dreyuk
it should suffice to show P_infinity converges, right?
or that the sum you wrote converges
oh
Well ig it's monotone so that's the same thing
If I were trying to convince myself I could prove it I'd just Taylor expand the ln
and I'd only care about the first term
but that could get annoying to justify
$\sum\ln(1-(-1/\phi^2)^i)\leq\sum\ln(1+(1/\phi^2)^i)$
Axe
Left is negative, right is positive
-x < ln(1-x) < 0 for x in (0,1)
if you use that to bound it should be sufficient
no problem
.close
Closed by @dry arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me here? i figured out the second part being wrong, idk why the third part is. ill send a screenie of my wokr
did you misread your 5 as a 9 near the end
Closed by @mighty sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo, im doing question 8a and I can get $arg(z-1)=\pi arg(z)$ but what am i supposed to do with the pi infront, i can do the graph for arg(z-1)=arg(z) but idk how to do it when I have the pi in front (if that changes anything of course)
KB
arg(Z-1) - arg(z) = pi surely follow the rule arg(z-a) - arg(z-b) = alpha
which the position is (a,b) well i can see it starts at (1,0)
the alpha angle is pi (180 degree )so the the vectors oa oz directions are opposite, true, but z must on the line that connect those points
so Z is on (0,1)
yes why you have the two vectors start from different positions
bc Z-1 is one unit to the right and Z "+ 0 " is starting from the origin
so Z would be something like this then ?
hmm angle is 180 degree so Z must lay on between 0 and 1
wait i draw
I think it is like this
yea so i got it correct then?
yess
ok ty
no worries
.close
Closed by @sacred solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ok i got another, for 8B how does it work now?
the lines are flipped:
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-28 message
i think they form a semicircle
a semicircle ?? why cant anything behave nicely
well you can see the angle is $\pi/2$
Minhh
which the angle formed by Z must look at the line AB as 90 degrees
this imagine of a circle, if an angle that is 90 degrees, so it must cover the diameter, which in this case is AB
let AB be two points on Re, which are (-2,0) and (2,0)
.
yea, i mean it half makes sense but its just strange
@sacred solstice Has your question been resolved?
what else is strange?
just odd that it comes out to be a semi cirlce, idk its just odd
and its hard to tell what shape it should be from looking at the stuff
thats what i imagine of im not really sure but semicircle seems reasonable
Let me see see. 😁
i dont think a triangle would would work lol ig
Which one?
HELLO !! "See see"
8b
i am unsure if the semicircle should be drawn, but it seems reasonable enough
bc. even for 8c i can see what it is but idk what shape fits Z properly
it would be a semi circle from past question, but its up by one so how does that change the graph of Z i just dont understand getting the set points of Z Which satisfy it
but how do i find Z bc i've got no clue
Wait you need to find z?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-28 message
What for?
Z as in for when the expression is defined
Before slayla comes, good handwriting
Oh.
Oh this one.
also sucks how i got no way of checking what it should look like bc Desmos doesn't like it : (
does it have something to do with this?
Yes.
Normally it's a circle.
so that's if they're on the same "level"
but what about when they are not
is it like a rotated semi circle?
I show you how I convert the stuffs.
arg(a) - arg(b) = arg(a/b)
So arg(z - i) - arg(z + 3) = arg[(z-i)/(z+3)].
Then let z = x+iy.
yea that makes sense
Simplify such that the denominator is a real number.
Finally, since the argument is equal to π/2, the result is completely imaginary.
is the circle from A-B the solution?
Yes.
But z cannot be the end point.
is that just in general
So it should not be a solid dot.
so when solving these, and they are equal to some angle say theta, i draw lines meeting up "in the middle of the points" and then draw a circle passing through all 3 and then thats my sol.?
Why three points?
$\tan(\arg(z-i) - \arg(z+3)) = \tan(\frac{\pi}{2})$\
Restarter
$\tan(A-B) = \frac{\tan(A) - \tan(B)}{1-\tan(A)\tan(B)}$
Restarter
Let $z = x+iy$, then $\arg(z) = \arctan(\frac{y}{x})$.
Restarter
Gimme 1sec
Yeah.
I understand how to calculate the arg, it’s just arctan, but when it comes to one minus the other so I just use arctan(a-b)?
No.
arctan(a) - arctan(b) ≠ arctan(a-b).
It's $\arctan(\frac{a - b}{1 + ab})$.
Restarter
where a is arg(a) and b is arg(b)?
$arg(z-i)-arg(z+3) = \pi/2$
$tan(arg(z-i)-arg(z+3)) = tan(\pi/2)$
$(a-b)/(1+ab) = tan(\pi/2)$ where a = tan(arg(z-i)) and b = tan(arg(z+3))
No.
$a = \tan(\arg(z-i))$
Restarter
so like... we get it in this form and how does it help us solve the problem?
Refer to this formula.
KB
Remember.
arg(z) = arctan(y/x) if z = x+iy.
So what is the value of tan(arg(z))?
tan(arctan(x+yi)) = y/x
Correct.
So.
How do we simplify this using the fact I showed?
tan(arg(a)) = -1/1 = -1, tan(arg(b)) = 3/1
and we subst. z and then subst. x,y and then solve for z
To be specific, you're solving range of values of z.
Which is expressed in terms of x and y.
I'll just write my solution later on.
but tan(pi/2) is undefined
Exactly.
At what scenario will a fraction be undefined?
if it approaches infinity or 0
Sorry, fractions, not functions.
My bad.
so 0 then
What 0?
the denominator
which is our x
You got yourself a function in terms of x and y.
In which, it would be easier to graph compared to complex numbers one.
Am I right?
yes
but itsnt the work to get here needlessly complex
oh so we get Z = yi bc x is 0
ok nvm, this makes no sense
so, we use tanget formulas and stuff to get $(a-b)/(1+ab) = tan(\pi/2)$
KB
and tan(pi/2) is undefined so we conlcude y/x is undefined => x=0
and then from there we have a function in terms of x and y ?
@sacred solstice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know what assumption im making for method 1 bc it looks correct
include the question for context maybe idk
oih ye
does anyone know what assumption im making for method 1 bc it looks correct
but method 2 is correct
It’s wrong because the red angle in that small triangle is also 30
Clearly the hypotenuse is 24 and the opposite side is F11
can you draw the FBD for an object in an inclined plane rq
can you try writing some of the forces in terms of mg?
@frosty cipher in case you didnt see my question btw
@frosty cipher Has your question been resolved?
Bro is still doing vectors
Can you post the full question
Oh here it is
Okay so
@frosty cipher
Let me know when you’re here hopefully if I didn’t fall asleep I could help you out
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
which question?
- Rational
- √2
- 0
- 5
- Infinte
- 5/3
5 in page 1
Sorry 1. Irrational
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn; please don't ask for direct answers. Ask for guidance, explanations, or feedback instead.
And also, do not cheat during exam
I think exam got over and dude merely wants the answers checked
Pls
okay no problem
if u can give me 2m i ll download discord in my phone to see from laptop and type there
Ok
7)4
8)1 and 3
9)postulate
10)120
you got 3,7,8,14,15,16,17 all wrong. 9th is tough to tell since postulates and axioms are basically the same things. Maybe see what your textbook says about it. Cant talk about 19 and 20 since you kinda didnt mark
🥀
How is 7th wrong?
Yea it should be 4
abscissa is x coordinate
Ik thanks
So if I consider both assertion reason wrong it will be 11
How is 8 wrong
I think it is correct
depends on what you answered for those tbh
point line plane, all things are defined
Fr?
I wrote both are correct and reason is correct for assertion
They r undefined bro
then 19 is wrong
@bright bronze check on Google or smth ig
not according to euclid. He gave like 20+ definitions in his book
In geometry they r undefined bro
verbatim from ncert which I believe OP is using based on their name
Yo bro can u please confirm answer for 8?
I will do rd sharma and rs agrawal in 10th if paased 9th
I can confirm that its not c
Which board u giving bro
Cbse
idt google is OPs textbook
I think google is universal textbook
feel free to contest that then. I got no opinion on what you have to say
I apologise if I am wrong but if u think it's 1 then I don't have anything to argue
I believe I can get 16.5 in written
What about assignment u have those?
Case based?
Assignments written one
Oh those I should get 20 on 20
Passing grade is.?
26.5 or 27.5
Then it shouldn't be hard passing
Hm ig u ll have to perform better in future
These were pretty basics
Start grinding brother
Yeah
I have never been taught that question in school
How can I get perimeter from perpendicular
But how from from perpendicular of triangle
I have never solved such a question
U solved every question of ur book?
Tbh for me this question is quite simple
I believe I will get 2 mark for herons formula and s formula
U might
Why might I should get
Depends whether u did them right or not
I wrote correct formula and solved the question by perpendicular
Then u would
In 20 marks of long questions I believe in 8 marks
5 for graph
Very easy
1 1 1 mark from other 3 5 mark question
12
18-19 from assignment
We should assume the worst
Hm
The assignment is different
Oh damn
12 in mcq 100%
8 in short answers
I mean 7
4.5 in 3 mark questions
8 in 20 mark
2-3 in 12 mark case study
Well u ll pass
Al the best
Closed by @midnight stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do you call these shapes?
I'm not talking about exponential vs logarithmic, but rather the way the graphs open up
Like they're both increasing, but one gets increasingly large, meanwhile the other one slows down the rate at which it's increasing.
If you understand me
concave up vs concave down (or convex vs concave)
Closed by @limpid monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
That's virtually the definition of e
i dont understand why is it tho
Don’t understand why that equals e?
yeah