Channel closed
Closed by @spice grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 271 of 1
Closed by @spice grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I depict a curve/bend in a space? what's the key, dragon scroll to knowing about 3 dimensional weirds (like curved spaces).
where should I begin my intuition after imagining a 3 dimensional graph in my head
look if you think of it
any 3d curve or bend is a surface so like you can maybe try to think of as a dependent coordinate's relation with indepenedent coordiantes like z=f(x,y)
for eg z^2=x^2+y^2
,w plot z^2=x^2+y^2
but isn't this just regular 3 dimensional objects?
could you like clarify more what you want to delve in
what does it mean for the space itself to be bended? how do you depict the bend if the bend bends the actual graph instead of an object
yeah one sec
how i understand now you are referring to how space bends due to gravitational effects and you are interested in that right?
like how to imagine curves and bends in 3d space
yes
imaginary lines but yes the usual space
but
yes
what does it mean if the actual lines there (that are parallel to each other and evenly spaced)
sort of bend/curve
not an object inside it
it means that the space itself has bent like the actual 3d graph in which we map objects
you could say that the space takes a geometry in that case
look the space itself takes a geometry
dependent on the distance and strength of the gravitational field or effect
hmmm but it really doesn't come to intuition
look consider 3d space mapped on a 2d surface as a blanket
u can see an example of a bend here (this one's really neat and evenly spaced but)
hmmm
i am like trying to give a intution consider spacetime as a fabric or blanket
and say earth is a ball
due to gravitational effects it bends the space around it
look we consider cause we observe the effects okay
like due to black holes time dilation or shifting but i know its hard to imagine
a few major things don't make sense here, if I just imagine empty space vacuum and 3 dimensional graph, and a particle going in it, I really don't understand how 3 dimensional space can actually be bent or curved; like what happens to the empty space that's generated/deleted when the shift from natural 3d graph to the bent area happens
And, how would you even measure what happens to the particle as it touches/goes to/through the space.
I don't think I have any set intuition to understand how regular 3 dimensional objects behave in curved spaces inside the same 3d world
like isn't it impossible to think that? does the particle expand and occupy all the curved area or does it
there is no empty space it just the fabric or space stretches accordingly lets say a black hole is moving while the space around it has a specific geometry as the black hole moves to another position the space restores it static or normal geometry basically like the fabric is streched no extra space is created
how would you even know or equate something
its an analogy
look i feel the geometry of spacetime has relation with einstein equations and we derive using that
oh wait that's true
i dont have exact knowledge
3 dimensional space comes back hmm
wait but
it is for understanding okay its not like i pushed in blanket so extra space is created space takes a geometry
look this space time curvature fits well with the effects we observe
look one more thing understand like this take a black hole for example how does a 2d looking hole has a horizon and a singularity due to the shear mass and gravity the space time breaks its pushed to infinity through the horizon to singularity
look i may not be 100 percent correct in the above context but you can understand gravity gives geometry to space time around it just that
hmmmm
How to faithfully represent general relativity ? Is the image of the rubber sheet accurate ? What is the curvature of time ? All these answers in 11 minutes !
For more videos, subscribe to the YouTube channel : https://www.youtube.com/ScienceClicEN
And if you liked this video, you can share it on social networks !
To support me on Patreon : ht...
watch the last part
alr thanks
@full birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Great channel. Vsauce also also has a decent vid to help visualize: https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx4NnQT43f9pquIiPNztPP-Ai3u_IqTCO9?si=zgsw_ELb0W5F5TSF
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hallloo
do you have a question?
you can close the channel in that case :3
hope you do good on your assignment, good luck!!
.close
Closed by @gritty rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
200000 s / 86400 s
why cant we get an useful answer to this question when thinking of division ONLY as
"how many numerator-units per 1 denominator-unit"
since it will give us the answer :
2.3148 numerator-seconds per 1 denominator-second.
which seems useless here
so again If we ONLY allow ourselves to think of division as “how many numerator-units per 1 denominator-unit,” can we figure out how many days are in 200,000 s ?
if I recall didn't riemann already help you with this question? 
im not sure what that restriction implies.
The way I see it, I don't think so.
if Alice lives in a world where 2.3148 seconds pass for every second in Bobs world (where seconds are 1:1) then after a day passes in Bobs world, 2.3148 days pass in Alices.
I dont think so, at least I dont remember
If we follow your self-imposed restriction, wouldn't this lead to a unitless ratio?
we got mixed up in dimensional analysis and other stuff that was not my question, so I thought of a better way to ask the same question that was clearer
but in any case it isn't 200000s / 86400s, it's 200000s / (86400s/d), right?
i think the question is flawed because it asks about converting between two units but also assumes that you cannot have a conversion ratio between these two units
okay sure lets do this
what does this tell us 20a / 4a
that in order to go from 4a to 20a you must multiply by 5
5, but it's dimensionless, assuming a is some unit
okay can we figure out how many sets of 4a are in 20a by ONLY thinking of division as
"how many numerator-units per 1 denominator-unit"
tell me how you figured that out by using STRICTLY this definition of division
"how many numerator-units per 1 denominator-unit"
thats like asking "how many sets of 4a are in b" using only 20a/4a
then I suppose 5a per a?
for each a in 4a, we have 5a which would give 20a and keep the proportion
theres nothing restrictive about this in this context at all
its just normal division
you are dancing around the question for some reason
can you just tell me what you did in you head when doing 20a / 4a while also only using the "how many numerator-units per 1 denominator-unit" definition of division
are we assuming mathematics doesnt exist in this hypothetical universe ??
4a + 4a + 4a + 4a + 4a = 20a
20/1 = 20, so you can say 20 is " 20 per 1 " in some abstract unitless sense
that is repeated addition/subtraction
or "how many times the denominator goes into the numerator"
the whole point of this question is to strictly avoid that definition of division
so we dont care about the units
and to figure out the answer to the question without using it
this is exactly what I was thinking
I still think you're question is flawed, go back to 200000s / (86400s/d), the answer is ~2.3148days... it's a single unit, the way I see it it's nonsensical to ask about "2.31days per..." what??
what does "how many times does something go into something else" even mean if you dont have subtraction or addition
it is literally how many times can you add it to itself until you get the thing
lets not go back to seconds, since its constantly moving the topic to something else
20a / 4a is just an better thing to focus on
but its a different question so i wonder why you ask the first one to begin with
it is fundamentally not the same question, because one converts between units and the other doesnt
the only reason the first "doesnt make sense" is because you talk about days without ever establishing what the ratio between days and seconds is
sure, thats why 20a / 4a is better
so your question is "why do we say division is how many times the denominator goes into the numerator if that is (allegedly) not enough to provide an answer"
no my question that there's 2 correct ways to think of division
"how many times does something go into something else" / repeated addition / repeated subtraction
and
"how many numerator-units per 1 denominator-unit"
and each definition should be able to give us the answer to the same question
so how can we figure out the answer to
how many sets of 4a are in 20a by ONLY thinking of division as "how many numerator-units per 1 denominator-unit"
but those are the same sentence.. this feels like a linguistics question. try rigorously defining what you mean by "goes into" without referring to addition or subtraction
it would be pretty hard to be more precise than this, I guess I can try to draw something like this
but it would prob not help if the original question didnt make sense
but this to me seems much clearer
pretend like it says 5 instead of 4
that is repeated addition/subtraction
you are only able to tell what cut of that bar to make because you know the answer
replace 20 with y and 4 with x
now draw a bar that is Y wide and one that is X wide
in order to figure out the ratio you need to stack X bars together until they meet or exceed the Y bar
that is repeated addition
you are using the same methods, but you are thinking of the answers differently between the two methods
so you want to arrive at the same answer using the same methods... thats doing the same thing. it doesnt matter how you look at the answer, you asked about the process, how we can go from 20/4 or Y/X to 5 or some Z. the intermediate steps, the "methods", are the subject here.
do you see that you kinda get 2 different answers
i honestly dont know what the red notes are meant to mean.
for the record, "5 per 1s" is wrong unless its 20 s / 4 s^2
does this make more sense on how we think of "per" definition
so this tells us that theres 5s "in" or "for" every 1s
do you not see what you are doing here ?
are you saying this isnt repeated addition/subtraction?
I do, but im telling you that we can think of it in a different way, and that way would make more sense depending on the scenario
this way does not really make sense, since it tells us that theres 5s "in" or "for" every 1s
which is not really useful when we want to figure out how many times 4s fit into 20s
but when we think of it this way:
it makes more sense, even tho its the EXACT same thing
its just kinda annoying that I have to switch between these 2 sometimes for an answer to make sense
if I were to ask you how much a there are per a
you would be forced to think of it this way now
so you are constantly flipping between the two
i think i see what you are trying to say but i still dont agree.
if im right, i think the best way to phrase your thought in the future though, is that you can represent it as either 5s / 1s or just 5.
i think the 5s / 1s interpretation makes perfect sense. i gave an example earlier.
5s / 1s = 5 because division by 1 and the seconds in both the numerator and denominator cancel. 5 is a scalar, so that if A/B = 5, then B goes into A "5 times", while 5s / 1s is a relationship that says "for every 1s that passes in X frame, 5s passes in Y frame"
yeah but
i think the only application i see for this is pedagogy to like, school children though. i dont think anyone working with "complicated units" needs to clarify the interpretation of their answer like this.
if you want to visualize what you are doing you would have to flip between them tho
200000s / 86400s
you can visualize chunk of 86400s going into 200000s
but if you tried to use "per" visualization it will not make sense, so you would have to flip back to "going in" definition
you would get how many seconds are there per every second like here
useless info
the per visualization does make sense
.
its just seconds in one frame per second in another
that is a very indirect answer, idk if with that information we can even get to the answer that 86400s goes into 200000s 2.3148 times
we dont get to the answer with the interpretation we've literally been over that
its the answer itself
I dont get what that means
we already have the 2.3148. what do you need to "get"
the computational process of the answer does not change, interpretation is irrelevant
we're just talking about how you look at the answer
we "got" the information that in every 1s we get 2.3148 s (when using the "per" way of thinking)
how does that help us find the answer to how many times a chunk of 86400s goes into 200000s
I kinda can visualize it now tbf after drawing these 2 pictures, but its still not 100% there
we can say that every unit of the denominator is 2.3148 s smaller
and stuff like that
but if you know any other "better" way to visualize it let me know
this is prob the best way to get the the answer to both questions
"how many numerator seconds are there per denominator seconds "
and
"how many times does a chunk of denominator seconds fit into the numerator seconds"
just by picturing this one way of thinking if you head
the answer is implied. its 2.3148. because the units are the same
without having to flip flop between this one too sometimes
ye I think this is it I will prob think ab this a little bit more but I can now answer both questions by just visualizing one single method and not having to flip flop between the other
which will make stuff like this a lot simpler / faster
I can type lol
thanks for the help 👍
this makes it a lot clearer
@jaunty iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jaunty iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i wrote
(T ^ F) V NOT (F V T)
would that be wrong?
this one is
this one is the correct
ik its an or (T V F) but im confused because of the NOT outside of
not (T V F)
i can switch them fine?
hi does anyone know how to solve this
open a new help channel
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
OH SORRY
wym by switching
the t or f
oh yeah
even if theres the not
You're asking if your solution is also equivalent to false?
yeaaa
false
What does not(true or false) give?
yea thats what i did
Is that statement true or false?
false or false is false
Yep
Any other questions?
yes
im about to watch a vid on boolean algebra
but is this something we could work on together>
?
This question?
I have to go in a bit so can't help with much
But i'm sure there's other people who can help you
ok np thanks alot
you're welcome
ill just watch a vid
alright if you have any questions just ask here and i'm sure you'll get help
.close
Closed by @spring vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @lime pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Alright, so i changed the order of integration and you get 2 different double integrals, the only issue is one is too difficult to solve anyways. The guided solution shows that we just used 0 to 3 for dy and 0 to y^2 for dx which is confusing since they intersect no? If you tell GPT to do the former it gets the same answer as when you generalise for 0 to 3.
Im wondering why do they yeild the same answer if we are integrating for different areas then? heres a desmos graph for reference
You're not integrating different areas. The boundaries on the integral define the Region that is being integrated.
Right, so why does the integral that includes the "extra chunk" is equal to the one that doesn't include it
What "extra chunk" do you mean?
That's not in the defined Region.
Although, you could technically use that in a solution.
Yes it's not, but even though if you integrate everythng including the extra chunk it gives the same solution why
It won't. Where did you see that?
Well initially I couldn't compute the tough integral I sent in my image so I asked chat gpt to do it for me and used that answer, when I submitted I checked the guided solution it had used the integral from 0 to 3 with respect to y yet still got the same answer
Yes
Yes
And what did AI show you to do?
That aswell, it's just the one on the right is really hard to do
Try doing it
3 / (12 + y^3)
Actually don't it will probably take too much time and not that they will expect us to integrate that
Perhaps break it down using partial fractions.
not sure i understand quite much
Do you under the point it is trying to make?
Nah I don't really understand what it's saying
What they did here looks incorrect.
@proper sun Has your question been resolved?
The integration I showed is incorrect so that entire explanation is invalid.
I mean its saying that yes it did a mistake there but that the overall point is still correct
If instead of the 3's you make it into 5's you get different answers according to gpt, which I've tested and seems to be correct? Eh it's really weird I doubt I'll see it in the exam. I'll investigate it further when I'm done with exams
Thanks tho @brisk obsidian
.close
Closed by @proper sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with my project
Yikes 25 pages
Yeah ik it’s a lot
Just thought I’d give it a shot
But I’d appreciate help if your willing to offer
How much of the final project is your grade
Where exactly are you stuck?
I just need like a start to the project to get me going
I didn't really get what the project is about.
Welcome to my life
Well verison a is the one I’m on
If that helps there is version b and there’s version a
Yea pictures of screen ain't easy to read
k start with slide 1
You should summarize in your own words what you need help with
you're supposed to make a frequency distribution right?
Yes
Kinda doesn’t excel have a feature?
it said do your own work and its supposed to be original
so you can use excel but try to keep all calculations by hand or max by a calculator
.close
Closed by @tribal dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So for the first one, I can't come up with an approach other than brute forcing it
is there any approach to do this?
Find one solution then permutation
ever heard of stars and bars?
Oh they don't have to be distinct
no, lemme google it rq
oh wow, that's much easier lmao
I assume the answer should be
11C3, right?
and for B I just need to find the value from 1 to 11
tysm
.close
Closed by @sacred yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
A frequently occurring problem in combinatorics arises when counting the number of ways to group identical objects, such as placing indistinguishable balls into labelled urns. We discuss a combinatorial counting technique known as stars and bars or balls and urns to solve these problems, where the indistinguishable objects are represented by sta...
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-28 message
Closed by @sacred yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty for that
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my step correct to find the derivative of this equation?
the second line is y, not y'
oh yea, i 'll get rid of that
rewriting ln(e^x + e^-x) as ln(e^x) + ln(e^-x) is an error
oh unles they are multiply with each other then i add them right
yeah ln(a*b) is ln(a) + ln(b)
is that too much parenthesis lol
i forgot the derivative sign on the left again
ok i added
how do i find the derivative of ln(e^x - e^-x ) ..
you should use the chain rule
it tells you that the derivative of ln(e^x - e^-x) is
1/(e^x - e^-x) times the derivative of e^x - e^-x
oh those should be +'s instead of -'s
ok this is correct
oh ok i'll add them
btw these are hyperbolic trig functions
you just showed that d/dx 3 ln cosh x = 3 tanh x
you're in the right channel don't worry
sorry, i dont understund the previous one the trig one ^^
Closed by @vestal kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if a function $f\in L^2(\vb R)$ has compact support, why is it impossible for its Fourier transform $f$ to vanish on \emph{any} interval of non-zero length?

Recall a basic theorem from Complex Analysis:
If an entire function vanishes on any open interval (or any open set), then it must vanish everywhere.
A compactly supported function has a Fourier transform that is infinitely harmonic, i.e., analytic and highly smooth. Analytic functions have strong rigidity: if they are zero anywhere on a chunk of the real line, they are zero everywhere indeed.

Compact support ==> \hat f is entire
wagwan mandem
Closed by @foggy vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
💀
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Based on the series, tell whether it is geometric or arithmetic
Find d or r
Find sum of first 15 terms
Did I do this wrong
this step is fishy
mfw 15/2 = 30
Okay the final answer is 285/4
correct
Lol I multiplied by 2 for some reason idk I saw my teacher multiply like that on a similar problem
depends on how the fractions are
$\frac{\left (\frac{a}{b} \right)}{c}$ is not the same as $\frac{a}{\left (\frac{b}{c} \right)}$
Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x
the first one results in $\frac{a}{bc}$, but the second results in $\frac{ac}{b}$
Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x
maybe you faced one of these instead
It was like this
oh
$x \left( \frac{y}{-1} \right) = x \left( -\frac{y}{1} \right) = x (-1) (y) = -x(y) = -xy$
Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x
it's kinda multiplying? but also the denominator is 1 anyway. I prefer to think of it like this though
if the denominator is not -1, you can still do roughly the same steps to get the negative sign out: \
$x \left( \frac{y}{-z} \right) = x \left( -\frac{y}{z} \right) = x (-1) \left( \frac{y}{z} \right) = -x \left( \frac{y}{z} \right)$
Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x
but that's all that's happening here
nps, glad to help
.close
Closed by @left moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this work correct?
Instructions:
Based on the summation notation, tell whether it is geometric or arithmetic
Find d or r
Find sum of first 15 terms
Yeah that’s how the problem was given in the textbook
@left moon Has your question been resolved?
@left moon Has your question been resolved?
yes
thank you
Closed by @left moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve sin = -11/10
south
Closed by @torpid perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i want to dive more into these questions:
in the first limit, why we have to multiply (ax+b) with (x-2)
in the second limit, why we have to conjugate (like a²-b²)
recall if the limit to infinity is not one of 0, -infinity, or +infinity, then the degree of the numerator and the denominator is the same
so actually there's another way to do the first limit
$\frac{x^2 + x}{x - 2} \approx \frac{x^2}{x} \to \infty$, so $a = -1$ (you want the $x$ term to cancel out)
south
south w the clutch
ohhhhhhh
again for the second limit, there is another way
$\lim \sqrt{4x^2 - 3x + 1} = \lim (ax + b)$ and now square both sides
south
we can square limit? new to me
well, square the functions inside the limit
then you want the coefficients of x^2 and x on both sides to match
||so that means you should complete the square of the quadratic||
🤯🤯🤯
the idea is that $\sqrt{(ax + b)^2 + c} - (ax + b) = (ax + b) \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{c}{(ax + b)^2}} - 1 \right) \to 0$
south
you can use the approximation $\sqrt{1 + u} \approx 1 + \frac{u}{2}$ for $u \approx 0$
south
really, why we have this
You can see why by squaring both sides
wow physicist
Closed by @mental pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given segments of length 9 and 12, how do I construct a segment of length 20, using both lines
Can you elaborate on this more? Just so I can be sure we're on the same page
Eh?
Hold on. I'm confused on what you're trying to ask for help on.
Is it how to draw them?
Practical construction kinda thing
No. How do I get to length 20 given segments of length 9 and 12. I'm supposed to use both, and not just divide them and multiply them
how do you divide and multiply lines 💀
I can't just split the 9 into 9 sections and copy it 20 times
I'm confused here
I can still bisect the lines tho. I probably have to make a shape or something. Idk what's going on 😭
Perhaps euclidian construction?
Smth like that
Lately we've been making triangles with midlines for proportionality to get the lines but idk how to do that with these numbers
What's euclidean construction?
Male it a triangle with 90 degrees
I don’t get what the question is
no ruler up for use
What do I do with that?
you can raise an angle
I can still use a compass and a straight edge to make a right angle
You get a line with length 15
they don’t have it
How do you know???
You get a side of 15 and divide that by 3
Pythagoras (sorry typoed)
that doesn’t help
Pythogoream theorem
Ok
they only have a straight edge not a ruler
Is there any way to get like exactly 20?
A straight edge lets me draw straight lines
I have no clue ngl
why not? thats absolutely possible with a compass and a straight edge
Because my teacher is annoying and said no
He wants us to find some creative solution that gets us to like exactly 20 or something idek. Like, he doesn't specify but he'll take points off
I hate my math teacher
he seem unreasonable Al
I guess I'll just do the right triangle and hope he accepts it 😭
||i think you are supposed to use 9 and 12 to easily multpily by 4/3 and 15 = 12+12-9|| idk how to motivate this
Wait that's genius
The 15 to 20 gives me a 3:4 ratio
And so does 9 to 12
that would be the best method if you also had a protractor to your disposal
But you don’t
I can still use a compass to draw the perpendicular.
yeahh
ABC right angle at B with AB=9 and BC=12 (AC=15) with angle bisector at C splits AB into 5 and 4
then double the 5 and then double the 10
Use the compass?
Closed by @silent dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
genius
oh you dont even have to do this, just copy the segment of 5 onto the line with 15
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. Can I have some help rearranging the left (yellow) side into the right (blue) side?
I would just expand the terms and make use of sin^2+cos^2=1 as well
Most of it is just the terms becoming zero because of the orthogonalities
I don't think there is any sin^2 + cos^2 = 1 involved
oh ya
@manic bramble Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @manic bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone plz explain how on earth they got that in green for the norm squared of the time derivative of r(t)
i got this so far when computing it
@thorny cloak Has your question been resolved?
@thorny cloak Has your question been resolved?
@thorny cloak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have no idea how they determined that the infinite sum of the measures of B'_k is < eps
@cold sail Has your question been resolved?
@cold sail Has your question been resolved?
@cold sail Has your question been resolved?
@cold sail Has your question been resolved?
Are you asking why the series converges?
@cold sail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ki dont get this question, like what is Q1 and Q2
$Q_1 (x)$ and $Q_2 (x)$ are polynomials
south
but it doesn't matter what exactly they are
your aim is to sub some values of x in to get the remainders (R and 2R)
@autumn token Has your question been resolved?
if you sub x = -2 into both equations
you will get two simultaneous equations involving a, R
ok so i subbe nto first and got -45 -2a
is -45 the R value
yep, that's the correct left-hand side
now how about the right-hand side, $(-2 + 2) Q_1 (-2) + R$?
it would js be R?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-28 message
i still dont get what Q1 is this notation odesnt look correct at all
you could say they are quotient polynomials
south
woops, corrected
I didn't sub in x = -2 into Q1(x) before, yep
but anyways you should get the idea
the idea is that polynomial long division / synthetic division will let us find the quotient
but the remainder theorem allows us to skip finding the quotient
it's like if I want to divide 1234567892 by 10
I don't need to know the quotient is 123456789
I just look at the last digit which is 2, so the remainder of the division is 2
how do you move forward with "a" thouhg
ok so rn im stuck at
so i have first equation is -45 -2a
second equation is 4a-50
i have no idea what to do now
can you simplify this for me? @autumn token
R?
whatever helps you, sure
no i mean like would it be wrong to
I actually don't know what you mean by this
like yk how a normal funuction is f(x)
ok i tihnk its fine i kinda get it tysm
.close
Closed by @autumn token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why do we need the dummy variables?
I don’t get why textbooks have them written asw dummy variables
Like what’s the intuition behind it?
do u understand the notation $\int_a^b f$
sheaf of markov chains
Well yea f(b) - f(a)
no
what
do u understand this?
Definite integral?
yes it's a definite integral
Yea? We’re integrating f from a to b
alright
so f is a function with 1 input
f: R -> R
in definite integrals ur integrating the function
ur not integrating f(x), but rather just f
u follow?
^
it takes 1 number as input
yea so how does that come into definite integrals?
like f(0) not f(0,1)
oh I see alright
ur integrating it
Alright so regardless of whatever ever the limit, it takes 1 input ?
yes
u define f first
then let a,b be numbers
$\int_a^b f = \int_a^b f(x) \dd{x}$
sheaf of markov chains
the rhs is just new notation
don't ask dumb questions
so here i could write the lhs as $\int_{x_0}^{x(t)} \frac{1}{\xi}$
sheaf of markov chains
? im explaining the notation to u
Alright
1/xi is a function
does that answer ur question
u don't need dummy variables
Hm wait lemme try digest this
on the rhs u could say x is a dummy variable
no actually informality
to simplify notation basically
so u don't need to keep defining new functions
So we could’ve just left it like this?
yes
Ah I see
Oh alr
like if u have a multivar func and ur only integrating wrt 1 variable
Then its useful to have a variable involved
bro needs that validation
I’m not a bro
mb
Closed by @brisk minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is very embarrassing but
I am not sure if I understand what mutually exclusive means
Idk how I got 90% on a level maths and somehow got away with not understanding it properly 😭
But yeah
Two statements are "mutually exclusive" if they can't both be true at the same time.
Wait is it
No that doesn’t feel right
At least for combinatorics
That is, if you know one is true, the other has to be false -- so one excludes the other, and vice versa.
Do you have a particular context in mind where that explanation won't fit?
Like you have to multiply two mutually exclusive combinations together
Huh, something must be garbled there.
I did a interview question today and it was the number of ways you can go from the top corner to bottom corner of a 7x5 grid
Assuming you can only go right and down
And considering you had to go through one other point
And basically I considered when you from the top corner to the one point and the number of combinations for that
And then from that one point to the bottom right point and the number of combinations for that
And I added them together and my friend said I can’t do that I multiply them because they are mutually exclusive
But again I’m not sure if I fully understand because
In this case does that mean we’re saying we can only get one point to the bottom right or the bottom right to the one point
Idk if that makes sense
Hmm, do you say you're counting "paths that start by going right" and "paths that start by going down" separately?
In that case I would understand your friend's objection as saying that "the first move goes right" and "the first move goes down" cannot be true about the same path.
That’s what I did kind of yeah
OHHH
So basically all of the path never crosses the other path
Kind of
Yeah ok
That makes sense
I understand now
So the "mutually exclusive" comes in when you have counted possibilities in two bins where each solution falls in one bin or the other, but never in both (that is, the two bins are mutually exclusive), then you should add the numbers rather than multiply them.
(By the way, the easier way to solve that original problem is to say that no matter which we you go, you'll be taking 10 steps in total, of which 6 go right and 4 go down -- and the path is completely determined once you've decided which 6 of the steps are "right". So there are (10 choose 6) ways to make those choices).
This line isn't even quite right - you multiply values (vague, btw) when events are independent, not mutually exclusive
@narrow mica Has your question been resolved?
Ohhhhhhh
Yeah that’s what I thought
So my friend made a mistake?
Possibly
Mutually exclusive events, with probabilities for instance, generally are added up
Oh, I didn't even notice it was the friend who had it backwards. 🙃 Sorry!
RTFQ, Tropo 
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help to verify if I'm right
[(24x^4y^7)/2 = 2^-1(24x^4y^7)] = 12x^4y^7
If for example:
1/2^3
2•2•2=8
1/8=0.125
Then
2^-3=1/2^3
Because:
(1/2)•(1/2)•(1/2)=0.125
I can do another example:
1/5^2
5•5=25
1/25=0.04
5^-2=1/5^2
Because:
(1/5)•(1/5)=0.04
If I'm right pls tell me cuz I'm trying to manage to know why it work
are you asking if this is correct?
Yeah and if 2^-3=
(1/2)•(1/2)•(1/2) is valid
ihave<skissue>
so here, $2^{-3}=\frac{1}{2^3}=\frac{1}{8}$
ihave<skissue>
Ty idk if I was supposed to learn that myself at 15 but yeah i think it kinda logic
15 should be the age to learn this
Alr thx but my teacher told me that I was supposed to learn it only in this way tho:
1/2^3=1/8=0.125
I think I proved him wrong
Finally
Well how we close I think I'm all good
@frozen cipher Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frozen cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone elaborate the magic behind cos(42,99) =0,547
@reef mural Has your question been resolved?
uh idk <@&268886789983436800>
Please be patient, our helpers are just volunteers and you’re not entitled to help. You asked a very vague question that’s pretty hard to answer, there no magic, that’s just what cos is.
We take any accusations of discrimination seriously here, but there doesn’t seem to be any, so please don’t claim this without reason, even as a joke.
cos is the the length of the adjacent side to the angle over the length of the hypotenuse so there's no magic
@reef mural Has your question been resolved?
chill…
Can you visualize it?
What are you asking?
Do you want to visualize cos function properly?
There is a method to do so
Draw a circle and a right angled triangle inside.
Take the angle from center and vary it
Cos(50°) is?
You can find out the approx range
To find exact value, use calculator or log table
Is your doubt resolved?
It doesn’t make sense
Fucking
It isn’t even half of circle
What does 1/2 indicate?
@remote cradle
@reef mural Ok so what exactly do you want to know?
How to find values of cos?
Or how cos function works?
?
So the cosine is a function which takes in an angle as input and gives output in range of -1,1
Maybe this would help https://www.mathsisfun.com/sine-cosine-tangent.html
you have to give us a picture of your triangle if you use a,b,c for the side lengths
The output is decided by first forming a right angled triangle with angle equal to input angle and then taking ratio of base and hypotanse
Why
When do you use cotg?
Itz a function, it does what itz defined to do
What's that?
Cotangent
@reef mural fyi "tan" is generally more commonplace than "tg" in Anglophone areas
My bad it’s ctg
It’s not
I know how to cite my shit
"tg" is generally more common in Eastern Europe fyi
sin, cos, tan, cot, sec and cosec
Regarding your original question... I mean it's not rly "magical"
That's just from the definition (well, one of many) of the cosine
Namely, that, if you have a right-angled triangle with another angle of measure 42.99°, the adjacent side and the hypoteneuse form a ratio of about 0.547
... Not that that's actually right lol
Because you're in RADIANS why 
Essentially you take this method of extending the trig functions beyond angles that you can draw, to allow for any real input
Then (and at a university level and higher you default this input to be in radians, essentially) you plug 42.99 in as the input
There's not much "magic" to elaborate besides this
tf is your point even, now.
You guys clearly lack pedagogical features.
Literally every person on this server.
You guys are not the first.
Counter question, when do u use tan?
Brilliant argument; wanna try giving evidence and explaining yourself? Else you're only talking to a mirror here.
Clearly at a/b
And you’re talking back now?
Well, as the person who didn't open the help channel i.e. NOT the requester for help, I've every right to, if what you've been saying is counter to any productive discussion.
Then cot at b/a
The thing is actually that yr concepts are not clear
you know, OP, you should probably consider not being an ass to people who devote their time to helping you for free.
if you don't like their explanations you could just ask questions about them, or do your own research.
plus, if you dislike their pedagogy, why not say how you want things to explain instead of this pointless callout?
not every means of explanation work for everyone, and I think you agree, but nothing stops helpers from trying to adapt to your method of understanding.
And you are not sure what question to ask in the first place
He's not sure what he's asking ig
His concept is not clear
I'm not addressing the quality of his question.
Well whatever
I really don't care
I just like helping u know
I give up
it's good that you don't, but that was for OP, not you, so there's that.
Closed by @reef mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.is this how you talk to all your teachers
. This channel became available quickly. Looks like even Bot was waiting for it to be over
Honestly I disregard my math teacher
ok have fun
Adios
.close
Closed by @brittle sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have this worksheet, I understand the basics on how to do it I just can't find out which method to use
is tehre a trick
or something taht can help
i understand when to use difference of squared or cube group or factor
but its mainly trhe first step
especially on number 11 i had to look up how to start it
uh
just like
factor out the gcd's of certain parts
and make common terms in parentheses
and combine or something
@north gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @north gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does the answer key fit into the formula?
you could think of it as a trapezoid rule with one (1) trapezoid
i.e. n=1 and so there are only the first and last terms in the sum, with nothing in between
that's if you are going to insist upon shoehorning the trapezoid rule in at all, when in fact the area under f(x) is a very literal trapezoid
how do we know n = 1
ok didnt know n was the number of trapezoids...
n is in fact the number of trapezoids.
Closed by @delicate jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So far the function I have is 340sin(120(pi)t) and wo=240pi
av I got 680/pi
But I'm stuck on the integral with the limits of 0 to 1/240
sin(120(pi)t)cos(k240(pi)tdt
I tried integration by parts but it does not seem the best
Can you write the integral down somewhere and then send it
@idle osprey Has your question been resolved?
@idle osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @idle osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need some help from ye engineerin folks with this question
this ones about thevenin
i already removed the load to start off
i got the total resistance and current source
and now i gotta figure out how i should find VTH
My progress
i dunno if i got it right
its cuz this load usually appears at the right side of the circuit, now its in the middle
like if i already removed RL then it becomes a series circuit
oh right there was another voltage source
got rid of it by short circuiting tho
Your steps are very convoluted
ik its confusing
Just do standard nodal/mesh analysis?
Mesh analysis is good here because there is one loop
Your objective is to find the voltage between the two resistors
Yes
@fallen jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fallen jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So we are looking at a function of the form f(x)=P(x)/Q(x) where P(x) and Q(x) are quadratic polynomials, and both P(x)>0 and Q(x)>0 for all real (x), leading coefficients of both quadratic are >0, domain=R, co-domain=R
So f(x)>0 for all x∈R, so teb range of f is contained in (0,∞), which means f is not onto R, because ut never takes negative values or 0
As input is R but range is only positive
So can we say that the f(x) is not injective by pigeonhole principle
what is your argument, in a little more detail?
What part
I mean what am I expected to explain in more detail?
i agree with everything you said but i’m not sure about saying f is not injective from them
Like f(x) is many-one function
yea
there are injective functions whose image is contained in (0, \infty)
so what’s special about these ones you’re working with
like you haven’t really mentioned anything else about this class of functions and that property alone isn’t enough
i don’t think we’re on the same page
So can we say that the f(x) is not injective by pigeonhole principle
can you state what you understand by "pigeonhole principle"? @gray magnet
and i will tell you exactly why it deos not apply
also @onyx glen hi
.close
Closed by @gray magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

@gray magnet it's kind of rude to slam the door like that
if you dont need help then at least say "nvm i got it" or "nvm i see my mistake"
Ohk ty
And also sorry again
I mean one of my friend told me that he is explaining it to me
So i closed and he explaining it to me rn
Btw he is also a beast like you guys he is also from top universities like you, from MIT
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
on my school Chromebook rn but dose anyone know alg 1?
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question!
if you have a question then send your question lol
im failing rn with like a 61 but I'd like help instead of using ai
aight so. these help channels are for getting help with specific math problems/questions
if you want study advice or looking for a study buddy or whatever that's for #study-discussion
@olive dock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no idea why it just stays on 2/3
try the ratio test for convergence
it would approach 0
i dont understand the 2/1 2/2 2/3 2/3 2/3 2/3
yes
since that's less than 1, the series would converge
but the way they solve it is confusing to me
is the image not your working?
no
sorry i shouldve said i dont understand the solution
i understand using a ratio test n! grows faster than (-2)^n so it approaches 0
i dont know what they did there
Every term n > 3 is less than 2/3
ah
Sorry that's wrong